Author Topic: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?  (Read 16284 times)

healthiswealth

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Getbig!
Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« on: January 06, 2006, 07:03:15 PM »
I was just chilling with the friends watching rocky IV for the 10 millionth time and the convo broke down to who had more muscle (in proportion). My friend says that stallone is much more muscular than drago, while my thoughts are the exact opposite.


Enlighten me...

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2006, 07:05:04 PM »
they were both small as fuck, Lundgren prolly weighed 210 and Stallone was 165.
Jaejonna rows 125!!

healthiswealth

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2006, 07:07:58 PM »
they were both small as f**k, Lundgren prolly weighed 210 and Stallone was 165.

thanks for answering my question.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31571
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2006, 07:30:01 PM »
I think stallone was more conditioned hardness wise ,lundgren held some bulk and water ,stallone was also older and training intense longer,but dolph did that awful master of the universe movie but gained serious hard mass to play role and would have smoked stallone like a cigar if they stood side by side,now i'm sure stallone is still in harder shape than lundgren.

420 Diesel

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2006, 07:47:30 PM »
Stallone didn't hit his physical peak until long after the Roicky series.  If you watch Cliffhanger, Judge Dredd or Demolition Man (none of which were very good movies), you'll see that he later attained a quite respectable physique.  Stallone at his best was far better than Lundgren.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31571
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2006, 08:13:05 PM »
True he looked really good in cliffhanger.

BigAlski

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 227
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2006, 08:20:42 PM »
Sly is a great action actor and shouldn't be considered "B" grade.  He plays his charecter well.

420 Diesel

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2006, 08:25:04 PM »
I thought king kamali played Judge Dredd.
nah, they needed someone muscular for the role.

Bast000

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 8144
  • Team Malk-Gallon
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2006, 08:25:54 PM »
Here is Sly with Mike Arvilla:



Kamali:


The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2006, 10:29:07 PM »
Dolph Lundgren`s max bench was 315 when he was filming ROCKY IV.  He posted this on his website message board.  He had a better physique.

Bast000

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 8144
  • Team Malk-Gallon
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2006, 10:47:32 PM »
Monster weight!



http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8510/training.htm

Columbo is quoted to say that Sly had 18 inch arms with a 29 inch waist.  That's impressive if accurate.


JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2006, 10:59:32 PM »
LOL thats quite a codpeice on judge dredd.
stallone was always pretty shredded but never very big. i doubt his arms were 18 inches, especially considering he is only like 5-7

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2006, 02:35:41 AM »
Dolph was 233 pounds in Rocky and 242 in Masters of the Universe.
Z

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #13 on: January 07, 2006, 02:50:15 AM »
Kamali:



I don't think Kamali did appreciate the movie Judge Dredd
I am a mini beast

ieffinhatecardio

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5202
  • More proof God is a man.
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #14 on: January 07, 2006, 06:25:15 AM »
Sly is a great action actor and shouldn't be considered "B" grade.  He plays his charecter well.

True, he should be considered "F" grade.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2006, 07:20:06 AM »
I was just chilling with the friends watching rocky IV for the 10 millionth time and the convo broke down to who had more muscle (in proportion). My friend says that stallone is much more muscular than drago, while my thoughts are the exact opposite.


Enlighten me...

  No.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

LLES

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2498
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2006, 07:38:05 AM »
Dolph was 233 pounds in Rocky and 242 in Masters of the Universe.



But consider the fact that Dolph is 6'6. It's not that impressive at all.

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2006, 07:41:44 AM »
Monster weight!



http://stallonestories.com/mf/mf8510/training.htm

Columbo is quoted to say that Sly had 18 inch arms with a 29 inch waist.  That's impressive if accurate.


18 inch arms, hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jaejonna rows 125!!

Bossa

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2444
  • Is that Bossa it must be, I heard he husky
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2006, 08:34:56 AM »
Columbo is quoted to say that Sly had 18 inch arms with a 29 inch waist.  That's impressive if accurate.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA 16" is alot more likely...you don't have 18" arms at 165

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2006, 08:36:11 AM »
BWAHAHAHAHAHA 16" is alot more likely...you don't have 18" arms at 165
i was gonna say 14" is more likely the truth.
Jaejonna rows 125!!

Karl Kox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6863
  • There's no Kayfabe in the business anymore.
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2006, 08:42:44 AM »
Stallone has never impressed me with his physique

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #21 on: January 07, 2006, 09:02:39 AM »


But consider the fact that Dolph is 6'6. It's not that impressive at all.

6'4 more likely but from a bodybuilding perspective it might not be too impressive, but as an actor there's not much point of getting even bigger
Z

BigAlski

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 227
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #22 on: January 07, 2006, 09:39:27 AM »
I think Sly's bank account would impress you :).  Dolph is not a poor man either.

c-u-n-hell

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 156
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #23 on: January 07, 2006, 09:54:35 AM »
I think Sly's bank account would impress you :).  Dolph is not a poor man either.
I thought we were debating physiques not $ but MC Hammer outshines all of them

Quickerblade

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10165
  • "Check my soundscan, Check my instagram"
Re: Was Stallone more muscular than Drago?
« Reply #24 on: January 07, 2006, 10:41:21 AM »
I think Sly's bank account would impress you :).  Dolph is not a poor man either.
I dont think sly is a rich as you think, his Rocky 1,2,3 and First blood money went to his first wife, His Rocky 4,Rambo 2 , Cobra and Over the top money went to Brigitte nielsen, his still a millionaire but he did take huge losses including Planet Hollywood.