Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Scimowser on January 19, 2006, 10:30:54 AM

Title: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Scimowser on January 19, 2006, 10:30:54 AM
can anyone think of people who actually looked better as an amateur than they do as a pro? Kamali springs right to mind, but who else has sacrificed their look to gain that extra 10-20lbs of shite on their physique?
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Bast000 on January 19, 2006, 10:32:50 AM
aaron maddron

(http://repetrope.com/assets/content/Media01/galleries/12009/fullsize/12009-maddron05.jpg)
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: 240 is Back on January 19, 2006, 10:35:41 AM
That guy who married Killy Ryan looked much better when he won his pro card.
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: HUGEPECS on January 19, 2006, 11:04:06 AM
Pro Card dont mean shit no more... a lot of these guys turn pro, but after that you never see them place any higher than 12th or 13th in these shows...so a pro card dont always mean a better physique in the pro ranks.
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Militia-Men on January 19, 2006, 09:41:47 PM
Dennis James
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: phyxsius on January 19, 2006, 09:55:58 PM
Greg Kovac
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Karl Kox on January 20, 2006, 07:27:40 AM
Pro Card dont mean shit no more... a lot of these guys turn pro, but after that you never see them place any higher than 12th or 13th in these shows...so a pro card dont always mean a better physique in the pro ranks.

agree some shows the are a bunch of guys you have never heard of
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Wani on February 13, 2011, 10:33:36 AM
Charles Clairmonte
Not knocking him, hes my fave bodybuilder ever
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: TacoBell on February 13, 2011, 10:38:09 AM
Charles Clairmonte
Not knocking him, hes my fave bodybuilder ever

I was thinking, who bumps a thread 5 years later... But that was very insightful.
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Wani on February 13, 2011, 10:46:56 AM
Not enough good new topics gere nowadays man
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: local hero on February 13, 2011, 11:11:13 AM
charley clairmonte was just a decade too late, would have been top top contender in the 80's, didnt suit him to go against the 90's monsters
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: MCWAY on February 13, 2011, 11:39:37 AM
charley clairmonte was just a decade too late, would have been top top contender in the 80's, didnt suit him to go against the 90's monsters

Clairmonte did just fine. He placed top 10 at the Olympia and won several pro shows in the 90s.
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: Tito24 on February 13, 2011, 11:39:55 AM
doesnt that count for most pros? best examples there are are ron coleman and jason cutler
Title: Re: Pro Card: Better or Worse?
Post by: axestream on February 13, 2011, 12:59:57 PM
doesnt that count for most pros? best examples there are are ron coleman and jason cutler

Yes, but IMO Ronnie is a bad example as he looked incredible in '98 (which was quite a few years after he won his pro card). But on a whole I agree, most IFBB pro's look better when they win their card than, let's say, five years later. Towards the end most have completely ruined their physique.