Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on June 12, 2014, 02:10:04 PM
-
>:(
-
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/graphic-video-isis-death-squads-killing-without-mercy-iraqi-roads/#axzz34Mhhqt6M
-
I hear the Terrorist groups are days away from gaining all power in Baghdad
Trillions of US dollars and they are about to overtake the Iraqi government that was never even controlled by a Sadam Terrorist in the first place
LMFAO
-
I hear the Terrorist groups are days away from gaining all power in Baghdad
Trillions of US dollars and they are about to overtake the government that was never even controlled by Terrorist
LMFAO
The terrorist in the WH wants it that way. ;)
-
Only way to control these animals is with an animal like Sadam, Will the next Saddam Hussein Please stand up ??? ???
Fucking Ruthless Video tho 333386
(http://img2.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/480/22656575-saddam-hussein.jpg)
-
Way to go USA with helping them to get weapons..like you helped the extrem muslims in syria lol
-
The US' foreign policy has always been cut throat - do or die.
The enemy of my enemy mantra, also used by the left(media, academia, etc), will implode what's still remaining of the west.
-
Only way to control these animals is with an animal like Sadam, Will the next Saddam Hussein Please stand up ??? ???
Fucking Ruthless Video tho 333386
(http://img2.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/609/480/22656575-saddam-hussein.jpg)
I remember my old mum at the time they ousted Saddam, she said, "they need someone like him to keep them in check"
How right she was.
-
I remember my old mum at the time they ousted Saddam, she said, "they need someone like him to keep them in check"
How right she was.
Exactly
How blind we were!
-
Vietnam all over again....
-
Mission accomplished.
-
Only Saddam can sort this mess, the CIA have to let him leave the new identity they gave him when he moved to the USA in 2004 and get back to Iraq and sort it/
-
-
Saddam musta been one tough kunt to keep these animals in check...he was the man for the job.
-
Saddam musta been one tough kunt to keep these animals in check...he was the man for the job.
This :-\
-
I remember my old mum at the time they ousted Saddam, she said, "they need someone like him to keep them in check"
How right she was.
Your mum was 100% right. Arab nations NEED dictators who rule with an iron fist. It is the only thing that keeps the nations stable.
-
Your mum was 100% right. Arab nations NEED dictators who rule with an iron fist. It is the only thing that keeps the nations stable.
SMH.!!! Usa HAD no BUSINESS THERE!
-
Exactly
How blind we were!
No we weren't. Everyone in real life saw this coming. Only the geopolitical and -economical interests are now feigning surprise.
-
SMH.!!! Usa HAD no BUSINESS THERE!
Really? Who exactly enforced the embargo on Iraq, planting the seeds of what is happening today? Who invaded Iraq but thought at first it was a good idea to back off only to change their mind ten years after? Who funded and pushed Saddam to attack Iran (how stupid was that, what an alpha- guy was always an idiot)? The lack of understanding of the situation is pretty impressive. Iraq has been US business for more then 30 years. It didn't start with Bush Jr.
-
I hear the Terrorist groups are days away from gaining all power in Baghdad
Trillions of US dollars and they are about to overtake the Iraqi government that was never even controlled by a Sadam Terrorist in the first place
LMFAO
The powers that be are allowing this for some reason? Or are we going to go back in and straighten this out again?
Way to go USA with helping them to get weapons..like you helped the extrem muslims in syria lol
It's really unfuckingbelievable... McCain openly wants to fight alongside alqaeda now.
-
America needs a new war.
-
America needs a new war.
Would love to be that Military Industrial Complex... :P
-
TEAM SADDAM
-
TEAM SADDAM
How could Saddam have been so stubborn that he would rather be hanged by GWB then just flee and live happily ever after in another country?
-
Funny thing is now the US has to get an alliance with Iran to stop the sunnis (a lot of these groups are not even Iraqi to start with but come from other countries). Kurds might help as they are moderate sunnis and have nothing in common with the Islamic State. Thanks to Saddam for weakening the Kurds for so long that they are still hesitant to give a helping hand. This will be interesting. I bet the Iranian nuclear file will take a very different direction if they have to go in.
-
I think it's about time to spread some democracy to our friends in Iran, followed by the Chinese sons of a bitches.
-
I think it's about time to spread some democracy to our friends in Iran, followed by the Chinese sons of a bitches.
Good luck with that. As long as you're paying for the popcorn, I'm in.
-
How could Saddam have been so stubborn that he would rather be hanged by GWB then just flee and live happily ever after in another country?
he said it himself in an interview, he thought the Americans were bluffing! ::) ::)
-
he said it himself in an interview, he thought the Americans were bluffing! ::) ::)
Complete tool. First, sacrificed half a million men (on a total population of less than 20 million) against a country much larger and with a larger army in hopes of getting a better access to the gulf just because he was given guns and money by Western countries. Realizes that he's been fouled and decides to get his compensation by invading another country (Koweit) thinking that the Western countries would allow it. Gets his ass kicked and becomes persona non grata on the international scene. Continues to butcher his own people while not giving a fuck for the situation he put them in. Still taunts the US and their friends. Gets his ass kicked a second time (actually, it's even the third time). Still hangs around. Finally gets caught and hanged. Not really a genius.
-
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-to-decide-on-iraq-strikes--in-the-days-ahead-163442597.html (http://news.yahoo.com/obama-to-decide-on-iraq-strikes--in-the-days-ahead-163442597.html)
Obama to decide on Iraq strikes ‘in the days ahead’
Acknowledging that hard-won American gains in Iraq are at risk, President Barack Obama said on Friday that he won’t be sending U.S. ground troops back there to battle al-Qaida-inspired extremists but warned he could soon unleash military strikes there.
“We have enormous interests there, and obviously our troops and the American people and the American taxpayers made huge investments and sacrifices in order to give Iraqis the opportunity to chart a better course, a better destiny,” Obama said.
“We will not be sending U.S. troops back into combat in Iraq,” he promised on the South Lawn of the White House, with his Marine One helicopter as the carefully chosen backdrop. “But I have asked my national security team to prepare a range of other options that could help support Iraq's security forces. And I'll be reviewing those options in the days ahead.”
Obama sternly warned the government in Baghdad that America needs Iraq's leaders — notably Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki — to embrace sweeping reforms to win back minority Sunnis and starve the insurgency of any popular support.
“This should be a wake-up call,” the president admonished. “In the absence of this type of political effort, short-term military action — including any assistance we might provide — won't succeed.”
American officials for years have pressured al-Maliki, who is from his country’s Shiite majority, to address deep grievances among Iraqi Sunnis. Instead, the prime minister has cracked down on that community, which for years fed the insurgency against U.S. forces.
“Over the past decade, American troops have made extraordinary sacrifices to give Iraqis an opportunity to claim their own future. Unfortunately, Iraqi leaders have been unable to overcome, too often, the mistrust and sectarian differences that have long been simmering there. And that's created vulnerabilities within the Iraqi government, as well as their security forces,” Obama said.
Obama underlined that the latest wave of extremists, known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, had roots in Syria’s civil war.
“This is a regional problem, and it is going to be a long-term problem,” he said. “And what we're going to have to do is combine selective actions by our military to make sure that we're going after terrorists who could harm our personnel overseas or eventually hit the homeland — we're going to have to combine that with what is a very challenging international effort to try to rebuild countries and communities that have been shattered by sectarian war. And that's not an easy task.”
-
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-to-decide-on-iraq-strikes--in-the-days-ahead-163442597.html (http://news.yahoo.com/obama-to-decide-on-iraq-strikes--in-the-days-ahead-163442597.html)
Obama to decide on Iraq strikes ‘in the days ahead’
Acknowledging that hard-won American gains in Iraq are at risk, President Barack Obama said on Friday that he won’t be sending U.S. ground troops back there to battle al-Qaida-inspired extremists but warned he could soon unleash military strikes there.
“We have enormous interests there, and obviously our troops and the American people and the American taxpayers made huge investments and sacrifices in order to give Iraqis the opportunity to chart a better course, a better destiny,” Obama said.
“We will not be sending U.S. troops back into combat in Iraq,” he promised on the South Lawn of the White House, with his Marine One helicopter as the carefully chosen backdrop. “But I have asked my national security team to prepare a range of other options that could help support Iraq's security forces. And I'll be reviewing those options in the days ahead.”
Obama sternly warned the government in Baghdad that America needs Iraq's leaders — notably Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki — to embrace sweeping reforms to win back minority Sunnis and starve the insurgency of any popular support.
“This should be a wake-up call,” the president admonished. “In the absence of this type of political effort, short-term military action — including any assistance we might provide — won't succeed.”
American officials for years have pressured al-Maliki, who is from his country’s Shiite majority, to address deep grievances among Iraqi Sunnis. Instead, the prime minister has cracked down on that community, which for years fed the insurgency against U.S. forces.
“Over the past decade, American troops have made extraordinary sacrifices to give Iraqis an opportunity to claim their own future. Unfortunately, Iraqi leaders have been unable to overcome, too often, the mistrust and sectarian differences that have long been simmering there. And that's created vulnerabilities within the Iraqi government, as well as their security forces,” Obama said.
Obama underlined that the latest wave of extremists, known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, had roots in Syria’s civil war.
“This is a regional problem, and it is going to be a long-term problem,” he said. “And what we're going to have to do is combine selective actions by our military to make sure that we're going after terrorists who could harm our personnel overseas or eventually hit the homeland — we're going to have to combine that with what is a very challenging international effort to try to rebuild countries and communities that have been shattered by sectarian war. And that's not an easy task.”
Slippery fucker just admit it's oil... ::)
-
BAGHDAD ON THE BRINK: +4500 Iraqi soldiers captured by Islamic State of Iraq (Militant Group Attempting Overthrow of Iraq)
-
Iraq, on the brink of Meltdown.
-
If Obama is releasing Terrorist from Gitmo , then its safe to say The Terrorist will win this battle :-\
-
Obama release 5 more of these guy back on the streets yet ??? ???
-
Would love to see the videos of these scumbags' limbs being torn asunder when drones blow the shit out of them.
-
(http://www.corbisimages.com/eimage/Corbis-DWF15-472509.jpg?size=67&uid=93846ac9-0260-4e4a-b65c-958ce76c1049)
-
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-275-us-forces-deploy-iraq-224935615.html (http://news.yahoo.com/obama-275-us-forces-deploy-iraq-224935615.html)
Obama: 275 US forces can deploy to Iraq
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is notifying Congress that about 275 U.S. military personnel could deploy to Iraq.
Obama says the forces are going to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. He says the forces are equipped for combat and will remain in Iraq until the security situation becomes such that they are no longer needed.
About 160 troops are already in Iraq, including 50 Marines and more than 100 Army soldiers. Some of those soldiers have only recently arrived.
Under the authorization Obama outlined, a U.S. official says the U.S. will put an additional 100 soldiers in a nearby third country where they would be held in reserve until needed.
The White House says the U.S. military personnel are entering Iraq with its consent.
-
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-275-us-forces-deploy-iraq-224935615.html (http://news.yahoo.com/obama-275-us-forces-deploy-iraq-224935615.html)
Obama: 275 US forces can deploy to Iraq
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is notifying Congress that about 275 U.S. military personnel could deploy to Iraq.
Obama says the forces are going to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. He says the forces are equipped for combat and will remain in Iraq until the security situation becomes such that they are no longer needed.
About 160 troops are already in Iraq, including 50 Marines and more than 100 Army soldiers. Some of those soldiers have only recently arrived.
Under the authorization Obama outlined, a U.S. official says the U.S. will put an additional 100 soldiers in a nearby third country where they would be held in reserve until needed.
The White House says the U.S. military personnel are entering Iraq with its consent.
275 will protect Baghdad! ::)
-
275 will protect Baghdad! ::)
[/quote
Probably would. Those moron Iraqis would die in 90's Compton.
-
Bump for goodrum