Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: agenda21nwo on December 15, 2014, 01:04:18 AM
-
-
What's the trannynewsnetwork?
-
How do people this dumb make it through daily life? OP and the cookaloos who make these videos.
I mean really Dick Cheney is eating babies... because he's an old white guy. Totally believable.
But the guys cutting people's heads off on tape or the nignogs running wild in packs on tape... Those guys are fine and it's not what we think. It's out of context.
Really how do you turn on lights or use door knobs when you are this dumb?
-
How do people this dumb make it through daily life? OP and the cookaloos who make these videos.
I mean really Dick Cheney is eating babies... because he's an old white guy. Totally believable.
But the guys cutting people's heads off on tape or the nignogs running wild in packs on tape... Those guys are fine and it's not what we think. It's out of context.
Really how do you turn on lights or use door nobs when you are this dumb?
Well, as I have been saying, foil hat idiots are the cancer of the modern society, because that level of stupidity is impossible without the mental illness. These are the dumb fucks who, when they turn the door knob and push, stop to think if it is the door which moves or if it is world which turns, while door stays still. That is new kind of mental illness, because they are able to spread it through the internet.
Sandy Hook is perfect example of that stupidity, because it is plain and completely proved case. There was this autistic moron full of hate, guns and opportunity, which adds up to be a sad and unfortunate mass murder. There were truckloads of evidence, witnesses etc. and army of professional investigators to solve what has happen, and most of the people of the world knows all that. Then there is this idiotic bunch of foil hats, which has only one argument: I don't believe. They use a group of drooling idiots to make these completely bullshit videos and spread ridiculously false "information", and by that they overrule all the concrete evidences, all the witnesses, all that fucking hard work which investigators had to do, and cover the truth with pure shit. And they call themselves as a "people who think with their own brains","free thinkers" etc.
What that really mean? They are willing to believe what ever insane and ridiculous crap instead of the concrete evidence, because concrete evidence is connection to the real world, which these morons fear like plague. I mean how you can "think with your own brains", while base of your thinking faulty: "all official information is based to lies". What kind of "free thinker" overlook systematically all the evidence of the official theory, but doesn't ask any kind of evidence what so ever for the "free thinkers" theory? This is what puzzles me most. I haven't never ever seen any kind of foil hat evidence, or even a try to prove anything by the real and concrete evidence. All their claims are based to denying the value of the official evidence in way or another. They use forgery, manipulation, pure and simple lying and ridiculous bullshit to build up their virtual reality, where even the laws of physics doesn't exist ;D
-
I'll check it out when I get a chance.
-
How do people this dumb make it through daily life? OP and the cookaloos who make these videos.
I mean really Dick Cheney is eating babies... because he's an old white guy. Totally believable.
But the guys cutting people's heads off on tape or the nignogs running wild in packs on tape... Those guys are fine and it's not what we think. It's out of context.
Really how do you turn on lights or use door knobs when you are this dumb?
Are you for real? Do you understand if you question ONE thing it doesn't mean you think EVERYTHING is a conspiracy..
Do you realize that over 50 percent of Americans think 911 is some sort of cover up. Are they all dumb?
This video is probably BS but I will give it a look.
-
50% is too low. More then that are stupid fucks who can't survive every day life and stress.
-
False Flag.
I said this from day 1 and got shit for it.
It was an FBI drill. There were ZERO deaths.
-
False Flag.
I said this from day 1 and got shit for it.
It was an FBI drill. There were ZERO deaths.
As is this:
-
These parents are fucking strange.
-
Are you for real? Do you understand if you question ONE thing it doesn't mean you think EVERYTHING is a conspiracy..
Do you realize that over 50 percent of Americans think 911 is some sort of cover up. Are they all dumb?
This video is probably BS but I will give it a look.
Actually yes they are
-
Yes, they are false flags, no deaths, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, London bombing, 9/11, all the same... Norway "massacre" with Breivik also... Columbine and Virginia Tech were more complicated, researched on them but still don't know if they were complete hoaxes or some sort of military operations (Littleton for example is/was a city under total military control) with real victims... Everyone believe what they want to believe, as always...
-
Wether it's to much media coverage & many different reports of the same events
From different People & Angles.
There are some of these Events that Do not SEEM to add up correctly.
It is not unheard of or unlike Governments to lie & trick their Public
For what they Deem as the Good of the Country.
It's Best to keep an open mind.
I would like to think We are Not Being Lied To & Deceived.
-
Wether it's to much media coverage & many different reports of the same events
From different People & Angles.
There are some of these Events that Do not SEEM to add up correctly.
It is not unheard of or unlike Governments to lie & trick their Public
For what they Deem as the Good of the Country.
It's Best to keep an open mind.
I would like to think We are Not Being Lied To & Deceived.
Good post... Important to keep an open mind, and maybe don't call others with different opinions "idiot", "dumb", "retard" for example... There are a lot of "conspiracy theorists" who take it really too far with lots of bullshits, but at the same time there are people that once you mention something about 9/11 being fake, for example, they become very angry and defensive calling you names...
-
Good post... Important to keep an open mind, and maybe don't call others with different opinions "idiot", "dumb", "retard" for example... There are a lot of "conspiracy theorists" who take it really too far with lots of bullshits, but at the same time there are people that once you mention something about 9/11 being fake, for example, they become very angry and defensive calling you names...
A good quote:
"Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out”
In other words, its good to keep an open mind, but no too open minded that you will believe any idiotic theory or idea that comes along.
-
What's the motivation for faking the Sandy Hook thing? Increase public support for gun control?
Seems highly unlikely.
-
A good quote:
"Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out”
In other words, its good to keep an open mind, but no too open minded that you will believe any idiotic theory or idea that comes along.
Agreed, a good quote... But how we define the limit? In my opinion, that limit is passed when people start talking about Reptilians, Aliens, everything Illuminati, and such... Nonsense for me, however, as i always say, believe what you want...
-
False Flag.
I said this from day 1 and got shit for it.
It was an FBI drill. There were ZERO deaths.
Cool. Parents must be so relieved.
-
These parents are fucking strange.
Selective editing. Remember Gasland? The liberals rallying cry against fracking...
Dramatic footage of the guys water catching fire due to all the fracking...
You know what is suspiciously lacking from the documentary?? Footage of if his water supply didn't catch fire before the fracking started. His water could have always been flammable from the high gas in the area long before the fracking started, but the info is left out.
Point being, selective editing combined with a serious lack of critical thinking by a large majority of knuckleheads, and videos like this get traction.
Gasland.... Oh brother.
-
Selective editing? Not in this case. Their attitudes toward the deaths of their children is not a result of editing.
Selective editing. Remember Gasland? The liberals rallying cry against fracking...
Dramatic footage of the guys water catching fire due to all the fracking...
You know what is suspiciously lacking from the documentary?? Footage of if his water supply didn't catch fire before the fracking started. His water could have always been flammable from the high gas in the area long before the fracking started, but the info is left out.
Point being, selective editing combined with a serious lack of critical thinking by a large majority of knuckleheads, and videos like this get traction.
Gasland.... Oh brother.
-
What's the motivation for faking the Sandy Hook thing? Increase public support for gun control?
Seems highly unlikely.
Disarmament of the public
The ones with guns will be able to fight back when marshall law is declared.
-
False Flag.
I said this from day 1 and got shit for it.
It was an FBI drill. There were ZERO deaths.
And now, just prove it by concrete facts and evidence. I dare you, just prove it? ;D
-
Wether it's to much media coverage & many different reports of the same events
From different People & Angles.
There are some of these Events that Do not SEEM to add up correctly.
It is not unheard of or unlike Governments to lie & trick their Public
For what they Deem as the Good of the Country.
It's Best to keep an open mind.
I would like to think We are Not Being Lied To & Deceived.
And your way to keep an open mind is believe that insane bullshit what foil hats present in those videos? Well, here is a mind opener for you: In every case what you morons say to be false flag operation, there is enormous pile of evidence, hundreds of man-years of investigations by professionals, there is thousands of crime scene photos, autopsies with pictures etc. facts which never reach to public. You and your kind make your conclusions purely without any of that, by that crap which you find in the internet. How dumb is that?
You haven't seen any of the evidence, you don't know anything but that little bit what media has told you, and your open mind do the conclusion that things doesn't add up? Well hey, fucking moron, it doesn't add up because you don't know flying fuck about the matter. Try to put that in your open mind? Your open mind sucks in all the bullshit which mentally ill and ridiculously stupid people put in the internet, but it rejects all the facts of the matter, because facts comes from the official source? That official source happens to be a base of your existent, because it gives you your identity, your education, it taxes you, give you your right as a human, but it is all lie because fucking moron in the internet say so? What is the matter with you idiots, are you all insane out there? ::)
-
And your way to keep an open mind is believe that insane bullshit what foil hats present in those videos? Well, here is a mind opener for you: In every case what you morons say to be false flag operation, there is enormous pile of evidence, hundreds of man-years of investigations by professionals, there is thousands of crime scene photos, autopsies with pictures etc. facts which never reach to public. You and your kind make your conclusions purely without any of that, by that crap which you find in the internet. How dumb is that?
You haven't seen any of the evidence, you don't know anything but that little bit what media has told you, and your open mind do the conclusion that things doesn't add up? Well hey, fucking moron, it doesn't add up because you don't know flying fuck about the matter. Try to put that in your open mind? Your open mind sucks in all the bullshit which mentally ill and ridiculously stupid people put in the internet, but it rejects all the facts of the matter, because facts comes from the official source? That official source happens to be a base of your existent, because it gives you your identity, your education, it taxes you, give you your right as a human, but it is all lie because fucking moron in the internet say so? What is the matter with you idiots, are you all insane out there? ::)
Wow you really are desperate to believe big brother is good aren't you.. I bet guys like you signed up for the Nazi party in the droves, because after all they were OFFICIAL weren't they, and they knew so much more than the common citizen with all their "special secret data" that the common man wasn't special enough to see.
-
Good post... Important to keep an open mind, and maybe don't call others with different opinions "idiot", "dumb", "retard" for example... There are a lot of "conspiracy theorists" who take it really too far with lots of bullshits, but at the same time there are people that once you mention something about 9/11 being fake, for example, they become very angry and defensive calling you names...
And you don't know why? How do you react, if I come and piss on your shoes? Do you think that I am a open minded free thinker, or an moron, insane fucking idiot? Same thing. Here is new approach for you:
If you have urgent need to claim that 9/11 was fake, SHOW THE FUCKING EVIDENSE WHICH PROVE YOUR CLAIM, AND START YOUR ARGUMENTATION FROM THAT. Somehow, no matter which one of the conspiracy theories we are talking about, this will never happen. Why? Because there is not any evidence for those stupid claims. There is only huge amount of insane bullshit from mentally ill people, who claim to be open minded and thinking with their own brains. How difficult this is to understand? Statistic shows that up to 40% of citizens of USA has mental problems. Statistic shows that 15% of citizens of USA thinks that 9/11 was fake. So even of those who have mental problems, 25% doesn't believe that 9/11 was fake ;D
-
Wow you really are desperate to believe big brother is good aren't you.. I bet guys like you signed up for the Nazi party in the droves, because after all they were OFFICIAL weren't they, and they knew so much more than the common citizen with all their "special secret data" that the common man wasn't special enough to see.
So, I am calling out for some evidence for all those false flag claims, and I am Nazi? Well, there we have perfect example of the logic of these "free thinkers". You are angry at me because I understand that claim without the evidence is just claim, which is too hard to handle with your brains. Don't be angry at me, blame your parents, because they have been breeding an idiot ;D
-
So, I am calling out for some evidence for all those false flag claims, and I am Nazi? Well, there we have perfect example of the logic of these "free thinkers". You are angry at me because I understand that claim without the evidence is just claim, which is too hard to handle with your brains. Don't be angry at me, blame your parents, because they have been breeding an idiot ;D
I never said you were a Nazi. I DID SAY you are the sort of person who does whatever the government of his time tells him to do - and gets behind it.
-
It's good to see people are so passionate about these things! They say more and more people are awakening these days, but the few slow or frightened ones will hold onto their delusions with increasing passion, even becoming angry because their fears consume them and they cannot face the truth.
-
It's good to see people are so passionate about these things! They say more and more people are awakening these days, but the few slow or frightened ones will hold onto their delusions with increasing passion, even becoming angry because their fears consume them and they cannot face the truth.
We need a mass awakening and I do believe we are on the cusp of one.
The media will never reveal this but we are growing in number.
Intelligence and free thinking will prevail.
-
Selective editing? Not in this case. Their attitudes toward the deaths of their children is not a result of editing.
Oh not in THIS case. I see. This is what I mean by a lack of critical thinking. Selective editing doesn't just mean remove by a word here or there.
Here's an example.
I lost my Pit after 16 years a year ago. The day she died if you stuck a camera in my face I would have had tears running down my face and basically been a blithering idiot. If you stick a camera in my face today I would say how sad I am about but my emotion would be missing... Understandably.
NOW... You decide you are making a documentary about my dog... You show her death... But you conveniently skip the first video of me crying and use the video of me from a year later... What would people say about me?
They would say I as a heartless asshat right? They didn't edit my words or take anything out of context... They just skipped one video.
Now try to process this again through the lense of a crackpot with no critical thinking skills... And a preconceived agenda.
Get a critical thinking book... Then watch all this crap you "know" is true. It will change your life.
-
So, I am calling out for some evidence for all those false flag claims, and I am Nazi? Well, there we have perfect example of the logic of these "free thinkers". You are angry at me because I understand that claim without the evidence is just claim, which is too hard to handle with your brains. Don't be angry at me, blame your parents, because they have been breeding an idiot ;D
No you're not, because it's all readily available. You conveniently choose to dismiss it so you can keep your Evil Big Brother narrative. NONE of these BS false flag CTs hold up to even the slightest journalistic investigation.
Visit fucking Newtown for Christ's sake. Ask the townsfolk, visit the sites, talk to the parents, teachers, and police, you selfishly insensitive idiot, rather than sheeping it up the rest of your YouTube wolf-cryers.
Then report back.
-
Disarmament of the public
The ones with guns will be able to fight back when marshall law is declared.
Do you really believe that the people with this agenda got together, brainstormed for a while, and then decided that faking a school shooting was the best way of doing this?
-
Do you really believe that the people with this agenda got together, brainstormed for a while, and then decided that faking a school shooting was the best way of doing this?
Ok well not sure if you watched that clip but the people that they used as parents of apparent deceased children were actors, people from Newtown are saying that this was only a drill but it is being made to look like it actually happened.
That part of the agenda is but a small piece to a plan which has been 100yrs+ in the making.
What other way could they go to disarm the public, quickly, legally and without backlash?
They need a bullshit reason to do this in the first place as there are a LOT of folk very passionate about their right to bear arms and rightly so.
-
And your way to keep an open mind is believe that insane bullshit what foil hats present in those videos? Well, here is a mind opener for you: In every case what you morons say to be false flag operation, there is enormous pile of evidence, hundreds of man-years of investigations by professionals, there is thousands of crime scene photos, autopsies with pictures etc. facts which never reach to public. You and your kind make your conclusions purely without any of that, by that crap which you find in the internet. How dumb is that?
You haven't seen any of the evidence, you don't know anything but that little bit what media has told you, and your open mind do the conclusion that things doesn't add up? Well hey, fucking moron, it doesn't add up because you don't know flying fuck about the matter. Try to put that in your open mind? Your open mind sucks in all the bullshit which mentally ill and ridiculously stupid people put in the internet, but it rejects all the facts of the matter, because facts comes from the official source? That official source happens to be a base of your existent, because it gives you your identity, your education, it taxes you, give you your right as a human, but it is all lie because fucking moron in the internet say so? What is the matter with you idiots, are you all insane out there? ::)
Are You Feeling Okay..??
Your Ranting & Raving Makes You Sound
Mentally Unwell.
My post Stated my Belief that it wasn't wrong
To question What We are Being Told By the mass
Media & or Governments.
I certainly don't believe all the conspiracy theories.
I do Look at what I am Being Told & Reported
On News & Question if is the whole truth.
I would say that is a Free & Open Mind.
Read your own Post, And Notice the Name Calling,
Swearing, Jumping To Incorrect Conclusions,
And Accusations of Things That haven't Been Stated.
For someone who wants to Make a Point.
You Come Across as The Moron & Idiot.
You Believe what you want,
And I will Believe what I want.
Not difficult is it.
Good night Sir,
As I would Rather Not Converse
With imbeciles Such as yourself.
Peace.
-
Ok well not sure if you watched that clip but the people that they used as parents of apparent deceased children were actors, people from Newtown are saying that this was only a drill but it is being made to look like it actually happened.
That part of the agenda is but a small piece to a plan which has been 100yrs+ in the making.
What other way could they go to disarm the public, quickly, legally and without backlash?
They need a bullshit reason to do this in the first place as there are a LOT of folk very passionate about their right to bear arms and rightly so.
No, once I saw it was 2 hours I didn't bother. I am not going to claim that I am knowledgeable about this incident, but it seems like an unnecessarily complicated way of reaching their agenda. I'm just trying to look at this critically & logically.
How could they disarm the public? Through clever legislation, plain and simple. Whittle gun rights away, little by little--which they have been doing thus far without major protest. Buyback programs would be another option....most gun owners would have a hard time resisting the opportunity to trade their gun in for 20x market value.
Ultimately, if our government wanted to declare martial law and have their way with us, it would be pretty easy for them to do so. Even _aj_'s stockpile wouldn't be a match for a remote-operated drone. Is it possible that this school shooting was faked? Sure, the possibility exists, but it's far less likely than the other scenario: that some nutjob just decided to up and shoot an elementary school.
Regardless, I applaud your passion and pursuit for the truth.
-
Oh not in THIS case. I see. This is what I mean by a lack of critical thinking. Selective editing doesn't just mean remove by a word here or there.
Here's an example.
I lost my Pit after 16 years a year ago. The day she died if you stuck a camera in my face I would have had tears running down my face and basically been a blithering idiot. If you stick a camera in my face today I would say how sad I am about but my emotion would be missing... Understandably.
NOW... You decide you are making a documentary about my dog... You show her death... But you conveniently skip the first video of me crying and use the video of me from a year later... What would people say about me?
They would say I as a heartless asshat right? They didn't edit my words or take anything out of context... They just skipped one video.
Now try to process this again through the lense of a crackpot with no critical thinking skills... And a preconceived agenda.
Get a critical thinking book... Then watch all this crap you "know" is true. It will change your life.
I get your point but you are missing mine so let me clarify. These parents of these kids were interviewed within hours of their death and not one of them even looked shook up. I can't remember the one couple but they actually called Anderson Cooper to have him come I think on the second day after the shooting to their home so they could ramble on about their daughter. Just weird.
-
I get your point but you are missing mine so let me clarify. These parents of these kids were interviewed within hours of their death and not one of them even looked shook up. I can't remember the one couple but they actually called Anderson Cooper to have him come I think on the second day after the shooting to their home so they could ramble on about their daughter. Just weird.
The coroner was laughing as were parents. There was no true emotion. All over played drama and fake.
It is too surreal to be a genuine massacre.
-
seems Ropo is in the minority on GB.
someone with some level of intelligence.
ropo you are spot on.
-
To not even give consideration that some of these events could somehow be orchestrated, biased and driven by certain special interests and agendas goes beyond being closed minded. The idiots who disregard everything and write it off are just as bad if not worse than the guys who are naïve and believe anything.
-
I get your point but you are missing mine so let me clarify. These parents of these kids were interviewed within hours of their death and not one of them even looked shook up. I can't remember the one couple but they actually called Anderson Cooper to have him come I think on the second day after the shooting to their home so they could ramble on about their daughter. Just weird.
I'm not missing anything...you are ASSUMING these videos are mere hours after the deaths because that is how it is portrayed. And if you were critically thinking... Are there are videos of the families breaking down? If so why leave those out? Do they not exist or did they not fit into this agenda?
Ever been to a funeral? No matter how sad you can always catch someone laughing. How about if your wife had a camera on you ALL DAY... even if you are happily married wouldn't she catch you looking at some 20 year old at some point? Does that mean you love her any less?
Critical.... Thinking... Books... Get.... Them.
-
To not even give consideration that some of these events could somehow be orchestrated, biased and driven by certain special interests and agendas goes beyond being closed minded. The idiots who disregard everything and write it off are just as bad if not worse than the guys who are naïve and believe anything.
Wrong. Evil exists... But for these type of theories to have even the tiniest bit of truth you have to change the evil from the guy doing the shooting to:
Police
Media
Government
Local community
Camera men
Producers of the tapes
Actors (cause the claim is these are actors right?)
Who else?
None of them..... NONE OF THEM... Would have a crisis of conscience at any point and say this was fake? Or slip? And say they got paid for this to a friend and the friend doesn't say anything either? Really?
All that is more plausible then there are sick INDIVIDUALS (nearly 100% of these cases involve prescription drugs but let's blame guns) out there, one of which shot up a school?
Think please.... Even once a day and your life will be better.
-
-
I'm not missing anything...you are ASSUMING these videos are mere hours after the deaths because that is how it is portrayed. And if you were critically thinking... Are there are videos of the families breaking down? If so why leave those out? Do they not exist or did they not fit into this agenda?
Ever been to a funeral? No matter how sad you can always catch someone laughing. How about if your wife had a camera on you ALL DAY... even if you are happily married wouldn't she catch you looking at some 20 year old at some point? Does that mean you love her any less?
Critical.... Thinking... Books... Get.... Them.
How can I be assuming the videos were two days after when that's when it was aired? lol I watched it when it was aired. Come on man the only way it could be false is if the interview took place before the incident.
Yes I have been to countless funerals and unfortunately been to a couple that involved kids. The parents were a fucking mess and were inconsolable. Only the mother of one of them was not crying because she was so sedated she could do nothing but drool.
-
How can I be assuming the videos were two days after when that's when it was aired? lol I watched it when it was aired. Come on man the only way it could be false is if the interview took place before the incident.
Yes I have been to countless funerals and unfortunately been to a couple that involved kids. The parents were a fucking mess and were inconsolable. Only the mother of one of them was not crying because she was so sedated she could do nothing but drool.
You left out the most important part... The video of anyone being upset... Do NONE exist? NONE? They were filming these people enough to get THIS video but nothing about being upset? The absence of THOSE videos anywhere is all I need to spot an agenda.
-
Agreed, a good quote... But how we define the limit? In my opinion, that limit is passed when people start talking about Reptilians, Aliens, everything Illuminati, and such... Nonsense for me, however, as i always say, believe what you want...
How do we define the limit? Well, I think we have standards that can delineate the limits. Of course the parameters by which these standards exist will vary by person, but we have methods (scientific method) to help us come as close as possible to these limits.
So, yes, certain things are absolute nonsense, such as half human/reptilians. Similarly, you would think I was full of shit if I told you there were monsters living under my bed.
I think the way to define that limit is by applying basic logic. People often look for outlandish reasons to disprove something, when basic logic will do. You know the old quote, "Extraordinaly claims require extraordinary evidence." I am not going to keep an open mind without sufficient and good evidence. My mind will only remain open to the extent that someone can provide good, solid evidence.
-
You left out the most important part... The video of anyone being upset... Do NONE exist? NONE? They were filming these people enough to get THIS video but nothing about being upset? The absence of THOSE videos anywhere is all I need to spot an agenda.
The so called absence of something that you have no proof of exists doesn't disprove what we have seen so far.
-
But what is more likely... The absense of the videos showing upset parents, or the suppression of them? Here's the best part... I'm 1000000% against gun control. In fact I think liberalism is mental disorder. And I STILL think this being staged is crock of horse shit.
Explain to me how covering up the fakery would work... Be thorough.... The guys filming, the editors, everyone has to know and never say a word. Explain please.
-
But what is more likely... The absense of the videos showing upset parents, or the suppression of them? Here's the best part... I'm 1000000% against gun control. In fact I think liberalism is mental disorder. And I STILL think this being staged is crock of horse shit.
Explain to me how covering up the fakery would work... Be thorough.... The guys filming, the editors, everyone has to know and never say a word. Explain please.
Im not claiming fakery. I am simply going by what I see. If there is anything that you would like to show me that may explain why a lot of these parents show not only no grief but an odd sense of gayety then please do. I think these people are fucking luny.
-
To not even give consideration that some of these events could somehow be orchestrated, biased and driven by certain special interests and agendas goes beyond being closed minded. The idiots who disregard everything and write it off are just as bad if not worse than the guys who are naïve and believe anything.
Retarded to think this f'n government is smart enough, sophisticated enough, and competent enough to pull off even a small-scale conspiracy (Watergate, Mai Lai, Jennifer Lynch, Pat Tillman, how'd they turn out?).
Forgot to plant WMDs in the middle of f'n nowhere, remember? No cameras, no media, just military. Didn't pull it off. But you're cool with a large scale event on Main Street America, right in front of our video cam noses.
Not to mention how many have to be involved and how extraordinarily our fellow Americans keep secrets. Pillow talk, drunken slips, deathbed confessions, nothing.
But we're naive. Grow the fuck up.
-
I never said you were a Nazi. I DID SAY you are the sort of person who does whatever the government of his time tells him to do - and gets behind it.
Where did you get the idea that I adopt governments opinion without thinking? What I have said, is that even if person is dumb as you are, there should be still enough intelligence to question any claims, which are presented without any kind of evidence. And that include all the conspiracy theories what I have seen from JFK assassination to Boston bombing etc. Modus operandi is always same: There is "official theory" which is based on evidence, witnesses etc. hard facts, and men-years of investigation. Then there is bunch of screaming idiots with all kind of ridiculous claims, but never even one little evidence to prove those claims to be based on the facts. My point now and always is same: you shouldn't overlook anything, before there is evidence which prove it is a fact. There shouldn't be any prejudices, if you are "open minded" "free thinker" and "you think with your own brains". Instead of that, your thinking is based purely on prejudices, because in your mind anything which comes from the official source, is lying.
-
Where did you get the idea that I adopt governments opinion without thinking? What I have said, is that even if person is dumb as you are, there should be still enough intelligence to question any claims, which are presented without any kind of evidence. And that include all the conspiracy theories what I have seen from JFK assassination to Boston bombing etc. Modus operandi is always same: There is "official theory" which is based on evidence, witnesses etc. hard facts, and men-years of investigation. Then there is bunch of screaming idiots with all kind of ridiculous claims, but never even one little evidence to prove those claims to be based on the facts. My point now and always is same: you shouldn't overlook anything, before there is evidence which prove it is a fact. There shouldn't be any prejudices, if you are "open minded" "free thinker" and "you think with your own brains". Instead of that, your thinking is based purely on prejudices, because in your mind anything which comes from the official source, is lying.
People like yourself even if it slapped you in the face would still look for logical answers as to not shatter your fragile mind.
Go to 1hr 59mins to see the secret footage of JFK's driver shooting him.
There is 1 instance of proof that is being held from the public.
-
We need a mass awakening and I do believe we are on the cusp of one.
The media will never reveal this but we are growing in number.
Intelligence and free thinking will prevail.
Mass awakening? Yes, but not that kind you want. We need a mass awakening because people should understand what insane shit they see in the internet, provided by the foil hat morons like you. Please please, pretty please, please show me 1 evidence which proves that Sandy Hook was false flag operation? 1 concrete evidence, only one, no more. And I don't mean any rumors or videos filled with complete bullshit, but one real and concrete evidence.
Because if there isn't any, how you can be so sure that it was a false flag? Because you FEEL there is something which DOESN'T ADD UP. Because you have seen a video, where they told you there is something which doesn't add up. And what is in the video? Bullshit. There is clips which are taken out from the context, which are mixed at the timeframe and lot of intertitles which tell you what you should see in the clip.
-
Mass awakening? Yes, but not that kind you want. We need a mass awakening because people should understand what insane shit they see in the internet, provided by the foil hat morons like you. Please please, pretty please, please show me 1 evidence which proves that Sandy Hook was false flag operation? 1 concrete evidence, only one, no more. And I don't mean any rumors or videos filled with complete bullshit, but one real and concrete evidence.
Because if there isn't any, how you can be so sure that it was a false flag? Because you FEEL there is something which DOESN'T ADD UP. Because you have seen a video, where they told you there is something which doesn't add up. And what is in the video? Bullshit. There is clips which are taken out from the context, which are mixed at the timeframe and lot of intertitles which tell you what you should see in the clip.
Cognitive dissonance...as you were and see above.
-
To not even give consideration that some of these events could somehow be orchestrated, biased and driven by certain special interests and agendas goes beyond being closed minded. The idiots who disregard everything and write it off are just as bad if not worse than the guys who are naïve and believe anything.
ABSOLUTELY - which is why Ropo is such a Dopo.
-
People like yourself even if it slapped you in the face would still look for logical answers as to not shatter your fragile mind.
Go to 1hr 59mins to see the secret footage of JFK's driver shooting him.
There is 1 instance of proof that is being held from the public.
Just go and fuck yourself, as fast as you can. I can't put it better than Vincent Bugliosi, who said that there was hundreds of evidence pointing toward the fact that Oswald was lonely shooter, and not even a one single evidence, that there would be any other party involved. There you have facts to not to believe, because you have some secret inside information, which you have found from the internet. Difference between you and Vincent Bugliosi is that he have an good education, and he has been investigating JFK assassination 20 years. You are just another wanker who believe anything what he founds in the internet ;D
-
Just go and fuck yourself, as fast as you can. I can't put it better than Vincent Bugliosi, who said that there was hundreds of evidence pointing toward the fact that Oswald was lonely shooter, and not even a one single evidence, that there would be any other party involved. There you have facts to not to believe, because you have some secret inside information, which you have found from the internet. Difference between you and Vincent Bugliosi is that he have an good education, and he has been investigating JFK assassination 20 years. You are just another wanker who believe anything what he founds in the internet ;D
Why so touchy?
Did you view the footage, its plain as day to see for yourself, evidence, hard video evidence confiscated by the people who ordered it.
-
seems Ropo is in the minority on GB.
someone with some level of intelligence.
ropo you are spot on.
Don't know about the intelligence, regarding how much I waste time to study these ridiculous conspiracy theories just to point to stupid ones that their theories suffers a great lack of evidence. I mean, where ever I look, there is plain and simple stupid fails in these theories. For example 9/11, which is claimed to be false flag, controlled demolition etc. etc. Still, no one has been able to point out even one single real explosion from any bit of video footage. I find that funny, because their theories are based on those explosions, and now they can't point them out. Word what they should learn is "counterevidence" = Evidence which tends to disprove a claim or hypothesis. Well, now they sit with their thumbs in their ass thinking what the fuck is that, because they really don't know what it means ;D
What makes this even more funny, a Finnish guy who hardly can speak the language can find holes in these theories better than these local boys, who are native English speakers. Why? Because I read the reports, I study these cases, not just talk about them and link shit what I have seen in the internet. Usually I study these theories "as we speak", because they are so simple and ridiculously stupid, and those holes in the logic of them are so fucking big ;D
-
Don't know about the intelligence, regarding how much I waste time to study these ridiculous conspiracy theories just to point to stupid ones that their theories suffers a great lack of evidence. I mean, where ever I look, there is plain and simple stupid fails in these theories. For example 9/11, which is claimed to be false flag, controlled demolition etc. etc. Still, no one has been able to point out even one single real explosion from any bit of video footage. I find that funny, because their theories are based on those explosions, and now they can't point them out. Word what they should learn is "counterevidence" = Evidence which tends to disprove a claim or hypothesis. Well, now they sit with their thumbs in their ass thinking what the fuck is that, because they really don't know what it means ;D
What makes this even more funny, a Finnish guy who hardly can speak the language can find holes in these theories better than these local boys, who are native English speakers. Why? Because I read the reports, I study these cases, not just talk about them and link shit what I have seen in the internet. Usually I study these theories "as we speak", because they are so simple and ridiculously stupid, and those holes in the logic of them are so fucking big ;D
Since you place emphasis in 'evidence' have a look above.
Its irrefutable.
-
Retarded to think this f'n government is smart enough, sophisticated enough, and competent enough to pull off even a small-scale conspiracy (Watergate, Mai Lai, Jennifer Lynch, Pat Tillman, how'd they turn out?).
Forgot to plant WMDs in the middle of f'n nowhere, remember? No cameras, no media, just military. Didn't pull it off. But you're cool with a large scale event on Main Street America, right in front of our video cam noses.
Not to mention how many have to be involved and how extraordinarily our fellow Americans keep secrets. Pillow talk, drunken slips, deathbed confessions, nothing.
But we're naive. Grow the fuck up.
Excellent post.... I'm gonna use some of your examples next time this comes up IRL
-
Why so touchy?
Did you view the footage, its plain as day to see for yourself, evidence, hard video evidence confiscated by the people who ordered it.
This is what you call the hard video evidence? You need to have your head examined, you poor idiot, and I can tell you why: with that resolution you or no one else can say nothing about things which they see in that video. It is plain stupidity even claim so, because you can't even see if it is original Zapruder, or clip from some crappy movie. From original Zapruder film you can't find what they claim to be there, so please tell why? And while you are on it, just explain why they have been able to prove that all the shots were shot from behind, by real evidence. I mean they have been even able to copy those shots not just by computer modeling, but with real shots with similar rifle and bullets. As I pointed out, Bugliosi has made a case study about this, so as a lawyer, what was his motive? He has spend 20 years to write a book about the case, and in that book he plain and simple shot down every one of these conspiracy theories. How? Because in 20 years he hasn't been able to find even one single evidence which would point that there was another shooter. There is only these stupid fucking claims that in those videos with complete crappy resolution happens something which isn't there. But anyway, just for fun, let see how your evidence holds when we look it closer.
So, the driver shot the JFK? Why? Why Zapruder film doesn't show it? Is the Zapruder film fake? It has to be the most investigated piece of filmed material in this world, so how they have make the fake one with tools of that era? They visited in the future and used photoshop? How, meaning what kind of means they used? Because so many have study that film and claim it is authentic? And how he shot? Right handed guy pulls a gun and throw a shot with his left hand, hitting the JFK but not at the senator who sits in between of them? No one doesn't even react to this shot, they just sit still, while act like that would provoke a reaction from anyone. Even the senator, who is facing the muzzle flash of the gun, doesn't react in any way? In real life he would be deaf and blind, but who cares about reality? Why all this tends to smell like bullshit? Do you even need any brains to solve that mystery ;D
Let's repeat the facts, which has been proved by real and concrete evidence:
1. There is a truckload of evidence which clearly points out that Oswald was lonely shooter
2. There isn't even a shred of evidence that there were any other party involved at the shooting
3. There isn't any counterevidence what so ever, only rumors, claims and speculation.
There you have it in the nutshell, so hopefully you learn something. But why stop here? Let me ask this simple question: To make conspiracies like JFK assassination etc. to happen, you need a bunch of people to make it happen. Do we agree about this? Conspiracy is always a plot which has been cooked up by several people, otherwise it would be some single nutjob doing his thing. There is one common thing about these theories, because there is never any leaks, nothing what so ever. There is saying: Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead. So why in the name of hell there hasn't be any kind of leaks about these conspiracies, while every fucking secret which USA government has ever have is in the wikileaks etc. Well, now you think that there is an answer in that saying, you can't leak if you are dead. Simple as that. But what it really means? It means that by every conspiracy, you have to kill every one involved, but the few key players. That mean hundreds of dead's for every fucking conspiracy, so where they find all these people for these suicide missions? They need to be brilliantly smart people because they doesn't leave any evidence behind, but still willing to die for some fucking false flag operation? Have you really think this over? ;D
-
Don't bother with the truth Ropo... The real truth no longer matters.
Hands up!!! Right?
We are screwed.
-
Since you place emphasis in 'evidence' have a look above.
Its irrefutable.
What a great argumentation. You have to be very proud of it. Never seen this before (like always) ::)
What you do for living, eat what your mom's cooks for you?
-
This is what you call the hard video evidence? You need to have your head examined, you poor idiot, and I can tell you why: with that resolution you or no one else can say nothing about things which they see in that video. It is plain stupidity even claim so, because you can't even see if it is original Zapruder, or clip from some crappy movie. From original Zapruder film you can't find what they claim to be there, so please tell why? And while you are on it, just explain why they have been able to prove that all the shots were shot from behind, by real evidence. I mean they have been even able to copy those shots not just by computer modeling, but with real shots with similar rifle and bullets. As I pointed out, Bugliosi has made a case study about this, so as a lawyer, what was his motive? He has spend 20 years to write a book about the case, and in that book he plain and simple shot down every one of these conspiracy theories. How? Because in 20 years he hasn't been able to find even one single evidence which would point that there was another shooter. There is only these stupid fucking claims that in those videos with complete crappy resolution happens something which isn't there. But anyway, just for fun, let see how your evidence holds when we look it closer.
So, the driver shot the JFK? Why? Why Zapruder film doesn't show it? Is the Zapruder film fake? It has to be the most investigated piece of filmed material in this world, so how they have make the fake one with tools of that era? They visited in the future and used photoshop? How, meaning what kind of means they used? Because so many have study that film and claim it is authentic? And how he shot? Right handed guy pulls a gun and throw a shot with his left hand, hitting the JFK but not at the senator who sits in between of them? No one doesn't even react to this shot, they just sit still, while act like that would provoke a reaction from anyone. Even the senator, who is facing the muzzle flash of the gun, doesn't react in any way? In real life he would be deaf and blind, but who cares about reality? Why all this tends to smell like bullshit? Do you even need any brains to solve that mystery ;D
Let's repeat the facts, which has been proved by real and concrete evidence:
1. There is a truckload of evidence which clearly points out that Oswald was lonely shooter
2. There isn't even a shred of evidence that there were any other party involved at the shooting
3. There isn't any counterevidence what so ever, only rumors, claims and speculation.
There you have it in the nutshell, so hopefully you learn something. But why stop here? Let me ask this simple question: To make conspiracies like JFK assassination etc. to happen, you need a bunch of people to make it happen. Do we agree about this? Conspiracy is always a plot which has been cooked up by several people, otherwise it would be some single nutjob doing his thing. There is one common thing about these theories, because there is never any leaks, nothing what so ever. There is saying: Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead. So why in the name of hell there hasn't be any kind of leaks about these conspiracies, while every fucking secret which USA government has ever have is in the wikileaks etc. Well, now you think that there is an answer in that saying, you can't leak if you are dead. Simple as that. But what it really means? It means that by every conspiracy, you have to kill every one involved, but the few key players. That mean hundreds of dead's for every fucking conspiracy, so where they find all these people for these suicide missions? They need to be brilliantly smart people because they doesn't leave any evidence behind, but still willing to die for some fucking false flag operation? Have you really think this over? ;D
The material witnesses have all met their untimely death, 40 of them I believe in total.
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/deaths.html (http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/deaths.html)
The footage is not fake them merely removed certain frames and sped up the actual real time of what happened.
Kennedys brain was also removed prior to the autopsy and another brain was used.
His brain would have revealed the shot from the front was the lethal shot from close proximity.
Kennedy was theatening with a full disclosure of everything that was going on including CIA drug dealing for the elite, the cabal of secret societies, the UFO agenda and Disbanment of the shadow government (table of 12 or majority 12)
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/documents/1960-1969.php (http://www.majesticdocuments.com/documents/1960-1969.php)
Selected Transcript of John F. Kennedy's Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961:
“The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.
And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.
It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.
And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security... And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”
All of this is available freely from FOI now.
Make your own informed decision.
-
What a great argumentation. You have to be very proud of it. Never seen this before (like always) ::)
What you do for living, eat what your mom's cooks for you?
Ad hominem, youre a smart fella arent ya?
-
I finally watched this video. Some VERY INTERESTING information. Not speculation, just facts. I think serious consideration has to be given to the possibility that this was a government DRILL, possible gone wrong.
Also really interesting to see that many of the key witnesses and parents are in fact ACTORS.
-
There are two extremes that hate each other - the people living inside the box and the ones totally outside.
The rabbit hole seems to go way deeper than anybody can imagine and the truth is elusive.
-
I finally watched this video. Some VERY INTERESTING information. Not speculation, just facts. I think serious consideration has to be given to the possibility that this was a government DRILL, possible gone wrong.
Also really interesting to see that many of the key witnesses and parents are in fact ACTORS.
Thats it mate...you need to have an open mind to everything and make your own free decision instead of being dictated what to believe.
Labelling as conspiracy etc is just dismissive.
Funny because most of the conspiracy theories from 20yrs ago are now conspiracy facts.
-
Thats it mate...you need to have an open mind to everything and make your own free decision instead of being dictated what to believe.
Labelling as conspiracy etc is just dismissive.
Funny because most of the conspiracy theories from 20yrs ago are now conspiracy facts.
the people that watch that video and believe it
are just as big a sheep as the people that believe everything the govt tell them
just because it takes the opposing view doesn't make it right
guess work is not fact
you are swimming in a lake of fools
-
the people that watch that video and believe it
are just as big a sheep as the people that believe everything the govt tell them
just because it takes the opposing view doesn't make it right
guess work is not fact
you are swimming in a lake of fools
Have you watched it because there aint much guess work at play?
-
Have you watched it because there aint much guess work at play?
facts can be manipulated
anyone with an agenda can paint a picture a certain way
ive watched a couple of conspiracy theory videos
the agenda always shines through
show me an impartial film
and I will show you evolution
it just doesn't happen
-
facts can be manipulated
anyone with an agenda can paint a picture a certain way
ive watched a couple of conspiracy theory videos
the agenda always shines through
show me an impartial film
and I will show you evolution
it just doesn't happen
Are you taking a course in "Poetic Masturbation" or "Meaningless Waffle"?
-
Are you taking a course in "Poetic Masturbation" or "Meaningless Waffle"?
retard level of intellect ::)
-
retard level of intellect ::)
Oh, "Empty Rhetoric."
-
Oh, "Empty Rhetoric."
post something articulate
something that shows reasoned thinking......
copy and paste it if you need to sucksoffmen 2013
-
People like yourself even if it slapped you in the face would still look for logical answers as to not shatter your fragile mind.
Go to 1hr 59mins to see the secret footage of JFK's driver shooting him.
There is 1 instance of proof that is being held from the public.
Ok. Been trolled. Well done, sir.
-
The material witnesses have all met their untimely death, 40 of them I believe in total.
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/deaths.html (http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/deaths.html)
Simply untrue. It isn't good way to start your arguments with that kind of lie. Try to understand the difference:
1. They are dead = you have prove they are dead, you have death certificate for each one
2. They are claimed to be dead = someone has spread this kind of rumor
Are you able to understand?
The footage is not fake them merely removed certain frames and sped up the actual real time of what happened.
Kennedys brain was also removed prior to the autopsy and another brain was used.
His brain would have revealed the shot from the front was the lethal shot from close proximity.
And every removed frame has a frame number, which is in the film material itself. If you remove some frames, you have to counterfeit all the numbers in that film, which means 24 frames per second at the half an hour film reel. That is 43200 frames to be counterfeit. Furthermore, while this film reel seem to be dark like the negative, those numbers are transparent, because there isn't that a photosensitive material in them. How do you counterfeit them in the way, that hundred's of professional investigators doesn't realize that frame numbers have been altered? In that era, it would be impossible. All the tricks with films were made by scissors and glue, or painting on the frames. Even a blind man would see it isn't original by using his white stick. You see, this is how foil hat's work. They feed you that kind of bullshit, but they never give you any background information, because it would reveal that their claims suck.
And what those pieces of brains would shown? Let me spell this out for you: IT HAS BEEN PROVED BY MODERN INVESTIGATION METHODS, THAT THERE WASN'T SHOT AT THE FRONT. All claims pointing to some kind of frontal shot has been pure bullshit, based on the Zapruder film, where we see how the scull burst open. This could be shock to you, but with that kind of shot it happens just like that. If you would know shit about the human anatomy, you would know that the top of the scull is thin and fragile, and bottom of the scull is thick, like many times stronger than top of your head. When you have been shot from 6th floor, bullet going in shatters the top of your head, and the shockwave spread your brains to direction, which has the least resistance = the shattered top of your head. So the brains burst upwards, where the shot has came. Simple physic. If you don't know what the shockwave is, just use youtube and search shots to the ballistic gelatin. So if those stupid hasn't misplaced the brains, brains would prove 100% what I just told you. Fortunately they has been able to copy that shot time after time, so there is plenty of concrete evidence proving that theory. And do you know what? In fact, they were able to copy those shots already at the 60'ties. That is one fact which foil hats happily omit, because it would make their claims look stupid.
Kennedy was theatening with a full disclosure of everything that was going on including CIA drug dealing for the elite, the cabal of secret societies, the UFO agenda and Disbanment of the shadow government (table of 12 or majority 12)
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/documents/1960-1969.php (http://www.majesticdocuments.com/documents/1960-1969.php)
Selected Transcript of John F. Kennedy's Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961:
“The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.
Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.
And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.
It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.
And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security... And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”
All of this is available freely from FOI now.
Make your own informed decision.
And no one knows how you have made your stupid conclusions, which make that to be some kind of relationship with the assassination. Even you don't know, because you have copy that from the foil hat site, where everything has been thought through for you, so you don't have to think, just use the copy/paste. I mean how stupid man can be? Do you really think that if there were some kind of far-fetched scribble to be a some kind of insane motive, it proves that the driver shot JFK? It somehow overrules all the missing facts, which I explain you earlier? As I said, you should have your head examined, because that kind of stupidity points out that you are insane, or seriously handicapped, meaning full retard ;D
-
I finally watched this video. Some VERY INTERESTING information. Not speculation, just facts. I think serious consideration has to be given to the possibility that this was a government DRILL, possible gone wrong.
Also really interesting to see that many of the key witnesses and parents are in fact ACTORS.
If you blindly believe that bullshit what is in the video, you could come to that conclusion. On the other hand, that video simply tells you what to think, so it is just another way around to your claim. It hasn't any facts, just speculation. For example, do it prove that parents were actors, and how. No. It just claims they are, by presenting you some actors, who look something like them. Here is further investigation about the matter: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-sandy-hook-nick-and-laura-phelps-actors-jennifer-greenberg.1231/ (https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-sandy-hook-nick-and-laura-phelps-actors-jennifer-greenberg.1231/). So the guy on that website has go to the distance, and debunked foil hat morons theory about the actors. It is fucking funny what those foil hat idiots do to make their point, but what is sad is the fact, that even as so fucking stupid and ridiculous claims as those, there is people stupid enough to believe those claims. Are you completely fucking mad? Just open your wrists, it is never too late to end life so futile ;D
-
Simply untrue. It isn't good way to start your arguments with that kind of lie. Try to understand the difference:
1. They are dead = you have prove they are dead, you have death certificate for each one
2. They are claimed to be dead = someone has spread this kind of rumor
Are you able to understand?
And every removed frame has a frame number, which is in the film material itself. If you remove some frames, you have to counterfeit all the numbers in that film, which means 24 frames per second at the half an hour film reel. That is 43200 frames to be counterfeit. Furthermore, while this film reel seem to be dark like the negative, those numbers are transparent, because there isn't that a photosensitive material in them. How do you counterfeit them in the way, that hundred's of professional investigators doesn't realize that frame numbers have been altered? In that era, it would be impossible. All the tricks with films were made by scissors and glue, or painting on the frames. Even a blind man would see it isn't original by using his white stick. You see, this is how foil hat's work. They feed you that kind of bullshit, but they never give you any background information, because it would reveal that their claims suck.
And what those pieces of brains would shown? Let me spell this out for you: IT HAS BEEN PROVED BY MODERN INVESTIGATION METHODS, THAT THERE WASN'T SHOT AT THE FRONT. All claims pointing to some kind of frontal shot has been pure bullshit, based on the Zapruder film, where we see how the scull burst open. This could be shock to you, but with that kind of shot it happens just like that. If you would know shit about the human anatomy, you would know that the top of the scull is thin and fragile, and bottom of the scull is thick, like many times stronger than top of your head. When you have been shot from 6th floor, bullet going in shatters the top of your head, and the shockwave spread your brains to direction, which has the least resistance = the shattered top of your head. So the brains burst upwards, where the shot has came. Simple physic. If you don't know what the shockwave is, just use youtube and search shots to the ballistic gelatin. So if those stupid hasn't misplaced the brains, brains would prove 100% what I just told you. Fortunately they has been able to copy that shot time after time, so there is plenty of concrete evidence proving that theory. And do you know what? In fact, they were able to copy those shots already at the 60'ties. That is one fact which foil hats happily omit, because it would make their claims look stupid.
And no one knows how you have made your stupid conclusions, which make that to be some kind of relationship with the assassination. Even you don't know, because you have copy that from the foil hat site, where everything has been thought through for you, so you don't have to think, just use the copy/paste. I mean how stupid man can be? Do you really think that if there were some kind of far-fetched scribble to be a some kind of insane motive, it proves that the driver shot JFK? It somehow overrules all the missing facts, which I explain you earlier? As I said, you should have your head examined, because that kind of stupidity points out that you are insane, or seriously handicapped, meaning full retard ;D
Overly aggressive arent you?
One would think you shot him.
Elvis died, do you want proof that he died as well...
-
If you blindly believe that bullshit what is in the video, you could come to that conclusion. On the other hand, that video simply tells you what to think, so it is just another way around to your claim. It hasn't any facts, just speculation. For example, do it prove that parents were actors, and how. No. It just claims they are, by presenting you some actors, who look something like them. Here is further investigation about the matter: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-sandy-hook-nick-and-laura-phelps-actors-jennifer-greenberg.1231/ (https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-sandy-hook-nick-and-laura-phelps-actors-jennifer-greenberg.1231/). So the guy on that website has go to the distance, and debunked foil hat morons theory about the actors. It is fucking funny what those foil hat idiots do to make their point, but what is sad is the fact, that even as so fucking stupid and ridiculous claims as those, there is people stupid enough to believe those claims. Are you completely fucking mad? Just open your wrists, it is never too late to end life so futile ;D
Point proven
You cant argue a case without including ad hominem to it.
Its a weakness and shows youre a sociopath.
-
Overly aggressive arent you?
One would think you shot him.
Elvis died, do you want proof that he died as well...
So, when I tell you some of the details which your "big picture" is made of, I am overly aggressive? Some how that sound my ear like you have run out of arguments, because your source tells you to look "big picture", and avoid details like plague. Sorry to say, if you pick any of these so called "conspiracy theories", truth is in the details. You can make the big picture look anything you want by bullshitting to people some ridiculous meanings for things which are something else, but you can't fake billions of details, and this is how these theories falls. It is easy to say that "driver shot the JFK" but you didn't were able to explain how, in that time and place with known circumstances which are based de facto information. Why? Because your mentors, the foil hat morons didn't put words in your mouth, and pitifully that is your only way to "think it with your own brains" ;D
-
Point proven
You cant argue a case without including ad hominem to it.
Its a weakness and shows youre a sociopath.
Sociopath? You have lost your argument, because your theory is plain crap and I can see through it, and now I am sociopath? Well, rather that than childish fucking foil hat moron like you, I have to say. And what makes me a sociopath? I use same internet as you are, but different way: you try to find some insane fucking crap to believe, because you are childish moron, and I look out for truth. That somehow make me a sociopath, and you a genius? Poor child, proving your ignorance by that bullshit doesn't make you smarter, it only proves that you are an idiot ;D
-
So, when I tell you some of the details which your "big picture" is made of, I am overly aggressive? Some how that sound my ear like you have run out of arguments, because your source tells you to look "big picture", and avoid details like plague. Sorry to say, if you pick any of these so called "conspiracy theories", truth is in the details. You can make the big picture look anything you want by bullshitting to people some ridiculous meanings for things which are something else, but you can't fake billions of details, and this is how these theories falls. It is easy to say that "driver shot the JFK" but you didn't were able to explain how, in that time and place with known circumstances which are based de facto information. Why? Because your mentors, the foil hat morons didn't put words in your mouth, and pitifully that is your only way to "think it with your own brains" ;D
The video shows how which you obviously didnt even look at so no point even arguing.
It shows it pretty clearly as well.
-
Sociopath? You have lost your argument, because your theory is plain crap and I can see through it, and now I am sociopath? Well, rather that than childish fucking foil hat moron like you, I have to say. And what makes me a sociopath? I use same internet as you are, but different way: you try to find some insane fucking crap to believe, because you are childish moron, and I look out for truth. That somehow make me a sociopath, and you a genius? Poor child, proving your ignorance by that bullshit doesn't make you smarter, it only proves that you are an idiot ;D
Sociopath as you clearly cannot communicate your point across without resulting in ad hominem based rhetoric.
I didnt get offensive with you because we have a different opinion.
Most of your posts are the same on other topics.
Youre clearly an insecure fella.
-
We need to talk about Sandy Hook.
-
The video shows how which you obviously didnt even look at so no point even arguing.
It shows it pretty clearly as well.
Video, which was recorded from the TV- screen with ridiculously poor resolution is your base of the argument? How it explain how right handed agent throw a shot with his left hand in milliseconds, not hitting to the senator who is sitting between him and JFK, not leaving senator deaf and blind by muzzle flash etc. Do you mean that video? Wait a fucking minute...I just shot down your ridiculously stupid claim by facts..how the hell this happen? It must have something to do with the fact that you are an idiot, an I have a brains? Hello hello, is there anybody home between your ears? ;D
-
Sociopath as you clearly cannot communicate your point across without resulting in ad hominem based rhetoric.
I didnt get offensive with you because we have a different opinion.
Most of your posts are the same on other topics.
Youre clearly an insecure fella.
As I earlier said, If I come and piss on your shoes, do you think I am intelligent fellow, or do you take me as an idiot? How do you cannot understand this simple thing? If you present yourself as an idiot, drooling on your shoes, it is something which you voluntarily choose to do, so don't blame me. I don't force you to tell these insanely stupid claims, you simply do what you can with your insufficient mental abilities, and I react to that. If you want to be taken as an intelligent person, just stop to be an idiot, and try to make even one argument which includes some real evidence from the real world. Not some purely fictive bullshit, but the concrete facts. For example, how the driver make that shot without provoking any reactions from the senator, first lady, secret service agent, senators wife etc. ? How it would be possible? Please, don't mind at all, but I have to SHOT THIS FUCKING PRESIDENT AT THE FRONT OF YOUR EYES, and you shouldn't even blink ;D
-
Time for your medicine "Ropo Popo". :D
-
As I earlier said, If I come and piss on your shoes, do you think I am intelligent fellow, or do you take me as an idiot? How do you cannot understand this simple thing? If you present yourself as an idiot, drooling on your shoes, it is something which you voluntarily choose to do, so don't blame me. I don't force you to tell these insanely stupid claims, you simply do what you can with your insufficient mental abilities, and I react to that. If you want to be taken as an intelligent person, just stop to be an idiot, and try to make even one argument which includes some real evidence from the real world. Not some purely fictive bullshit, but the concrete facts. For example, how the driver make that shot without provoking any reactions from the senator, first lady, secret service agent, senators wife etc. ? How it would be possible? Please, don't mind at all, but I have to SHOT THIS FUCKING PRESIDENT AT THE FRONT OF YOUR EYES, and you shouldn't even blink ;D
The passenger held the wheel whilst he shot him.
Jackie scrambled away from him as she seen it.
Take it for what it is.
No need to start raising ones BP.
-
We need to talk about Sandy Hook.
Just talk with your nanny when he put you in your bed between your teddy and your security blanket. What do you need to talk about it? That you are fucking foil hat moron, and believe that all the parents were actor, which they wasn't ? That all those tons of evidence which professional investigators gathered were fake, which they wasn't? Or do you want to talk about the mental problems, which make you believe any pitifully stupid claims even without asking any kind of evidence for them? That you could talk with your psychiatric, because he is only one who can help you..
-
The passenger held the wheel whilst he shot him.
Jackie scrambled away from him as she seen it.
Take it for what it is.
No need to start raising ones BP.
And now, just prove it. Where is the bullet, where is the burns of the muzzle flash on the senators face, where is all those little details which you rather forget? So you are saying that the senator were on the suicide mission with his wife, because neither he or she react to shot, so they have to know it was coming? They has to be a part of the conspiracy just like Jackie, all of the agents and bystanders, who didn't see the shot? So, if that situation were like whole USA vs. JFK, why they didn't kill him in his sleep? He was under a heavy medication because of his back problems, so he would be potential victim for overdose or complication of the drugs he used. Why in the name of hell they need this kind of fucking circus with hundreds of participants, while one syringe in the middle of the night would be enough? And while you try to find something to copy/paste, please keep in your mind that there has been professional lawyer studying this incident with the dollar signs rolling on his eyes, and this greedy bastard didn't find any other shooter than Oswald, even he has spend 20 years to study every fucking detail there is. He has win over 100 criminal cases, including Manson case, so he have been around as they say. How about you? Child of the white trash, living in the trailer park, poor education from the public school, using most of his time to wanking at the front of his computer by the free porn sites? It seem to me that you are in wrong league, poor child...
-
If you ever wonder how Obama got elected twice this thread is the answer.
-
And now, just prove it. Where is the bullet, where is the burns of the muzzle flash on the senators face, where is all those little details which you rather forget? So you are saying that the senator were on the suicide mission with his wife, because nether he or she react to shot, so they have to know it was coming? They has to be a part of the conspiracy just like Jackie, all of the agents and bystanders, who didn't see the shot? So, if that situation were like whole USA vs. JFK, why they didn't kill him in his sleep? He was under a heavy medication because of his back problems, so he would be potential victim for overdose or complication of the drugs he used. Why in the name of hell they need this kind of fucking circus with hundreds of participants, while one syringe in the middle of the night would be enough? And while you try to find something to copy/paste, please keep in your mind that there has been professional lawyer studying this incident with the dollar signs rolling on his eyes, and this greedy bastard didn't find any other shooter than Oswald, even he has spend 20 years to study every fucking detail there is. He has win over 100 criminal cases, including Manson case, so he have been around as they say. How about you? Child of the white trash, living in the trailer park, poor education from the public school, using most of his time to wanking at the front of his computer by the free porn sites? It seem to me that you are in wrong league, poor child...
Very passionate about trying to discredit 'tin foil' arent we?
Leave you to your sociopathic tendancies.
-
Ropo, have you watched the documentary?
-
Please move this shit to the tin-foiler board.
-
Zapruder's film is total forgery, a known fake... Vatican and Rome were the mandants of JFK's murder, who did it and how i don't know...
-
Well, as I have been saying, foil hat idiots are the cancer of the modern society, because that level of stupidity is impossible without the mental illness. These are the dumb fucks who, when they turn the door knob and push, stop to think if it is the door which moves or if it is world which turns, while door stays still. That is new kind of mental illness, because they are able to spread it through the internet.
Sandy Hook is perfect example of that stupidity, because it is plain and completely proved case. There was this autistic moron full of hate, guns and opportunity, which adds up to be a sad and unfortunate mass murder. There were truckloads of evidence, witnesses etc. and army of professional investigators to solve what has happen, and most of the people of the world knows all that. Then there is this idiotic bunch of foil hats, which has only one argument: I don't believe. They use a group of drooling idiots to make these completely bullshit videos and spread ridiculously false "information", and by that they overrule all the concrete evidences, all the witnesses, all that fucking hard work which investigators had to do, and cover the truth with pure shit. And they call themselves as a "people who think with their own brains","free thinkers" etc.
What that really mean? They are willing to believe what ever insane and ridiculous crap instead of the concrete evidence, because concrete evidence is connection to the real world, which these morons fear like plague. I mean how you can "think with your own brains", while base of your thinking faulty: "all official information is based to lies". What kind of "free thinker" overlook systematically all the evidence of the official theory, but doesn't ask any kind of evidence what so ever for the "free thinkers" theory? This is what puzzles me most. I haven't never ever seen any kind of foil hat evidence, or even a try to prove anything by the real and concrete evidence. All their claims are based to denying the value of the official evidence in way or another. They use forgery, manipulation, pure and simple lying and ridiculous bullshit to build up their virtual reality, where even the laws of physics doesn't exist ;D
Quote of the year for me bro - The internet is totally awash with these new age conspiracy types who come up with this bullshit with even less regard and far, far less evidence than the information they are trying to debunk...twenty five years ago they were the arseholes in the corner of the pub dribbling into their pint glasses but with the invention of the internet they suddenly have an audience.
I am all for questioning and searching for the truth but if these donkeys have an opinion at least give it credence with evidence not bullshit..
-
Very passionate about trying to discredit 'tin foil' arent we?
Leave you to your sociopathic tendancies.
Very passionate sociopath? That is oxymoron, but it would be too much to ask that you would know what the word "oxymoron" means. Ask your mom to explain it for you. What comes to your evident lack of facts and arguments, there isn't anything new about that. This happen always when stupid like you find himself to loosing a debate. I only show you difference between reality and foil hat crap, and it was too much to you to handle? Why do you blame me, when I am telling the truth to you, while your foil hat mentors have been feeding you with that ridiculous bullshit year after year? Shame on you ;D
-
Ropo, have you watched the documentary?
About what? About the stupidity of the foil hat morons like you? Calm down, wipe the drool from your face, focus and try to be a bit more specific with your question?
-
Zapruder's film is total forgery, a known fake... Vatican and Rome were the mandants of JFK's murder, who did it and how i don't know...
So, you decide to drop by to show how ignorant and stupid you are, like everybody here wouldn't know it already? What next? Will you show us how deep you can push your head in your ass?
-
About what? About the stupidity of the foil hat morons like you? Calm down, wipe the drool from your face, focus and try to be a bit more specific with your question?
Just as I thought. Like a true ignoramus, you write pages upon pages of diatribe about a video you have not even watched.
-
Just as I thought. Like a true ignoramus, you write pages upon pages of diatribe about a video you have not even watched.
People like him stink of agenda by not even fathoming of keeping an open unbiased mind.
At worst he might find it compelling but still remain skeptical. Instead he lauches into insults and ramblings like his life depends on it.
-
So, you decide to drop by to show how ignorant and stupid you are, like everybody here wouldn't know it already? What next? Will you show us how deep you can push your head in your ass?
Wow, slow down Ropo, it's not like i ploughed your ass incessantly, take your meds and learn how to respect other people's opinions...
-
This Ropo dude is so angry!
-
But what is more likely... The absense of the videos showing upset parents, or the suppression of them? Here's the best part... I'm 1000000% against gun control. In fact I think liberalism is mental disorder. And I STILL think this being staged is crock of horse shit.
Explain to me how covering up the fakery would work... Be thorough.... The guys filming, the editors, everyone has to know and never say a word. Explain please.
1 out of every 24 people that walk the Earth are sociopaths. A sociopath does not have the ability to have empathy toward anything including their own offspring. The CIA is one of many groups that test people for this and recruit them...I don't know what went on with Sandy Hook but a sociopath couldn't give a rats ass about kids being killed...These sociopaths are EVERYWHERE...And if some organization was going to pull off something like this, they would use people who wouldn't talk about it because they just wouldn't give a fuck. People like us who do have empathy toward other human beings can't possibly understand the depths of a sociopath.
-
This Ropo dude is so angry!
(http://masbury.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/188789_404148232997293_132185430_n.jpg)
-
Just as I thought. Like a true ignoramus, you write pages upon pages of diatribe about a video you have not even watched.
World is filled with different kind of documentaries, so you really need to be more specific with your question, or do you call that piece of crap as "documentary" which is isn't. You see, documentary is something which has facts in it, and that foil hat crap hasn't. Of course it is enough for you if they claim it has facts, because you aren't smart enough to realize, that those is just claims. No evidence what so ever, just claims. Do you understand the difference? Why, if some anonym foil hat says that sandy hook was false flag, it becomes an absolute truth for guys like you, even if there isn't and never will be any evidence to prove that claim? With same logic, when I claim that you are complete moron, sucking your own cock, it is absolute truth. Do I have any evidence to prove my claim? Just as much as foil hats has for their claims ;D :o ;D
-
This Ropo dude is so angry!
Angry? Did I scare whining little foil hat moron? Oh my, what kind of sissy you are? And what next, will you tell your mama that evil man has tormented you in the internet, while you were chanting your foil hat mantra? Grow up, you girly man.. ;D
-
People like him stink of agenda by not even fathoming of keeping an open unbiased mind.
At worst he might find it compelling but still remain skeptical. Instead he lauches into insults and ramblings like his life depends on it.
So, how many times I have to ask that with your open unbiased mind, just show me the evidence which prove you claims to be facts. How fucking difficult that could be? Wait a minute, there has to be reason why it is so difficult? And we both know what the reason is, because YOU DON'T HAVE ANY FUCKING EVIDENCE.
When you and the foil hat morons of the world will understand, that only right way to argument is do it through the evidence. It isn't enough if you say this and that, you have to prove that what you say is a fact. You never can do that, so you try to criticize my person instead. Wow, I never see that coming...like it is what happens every fucking time when stupid's like you lose the debate. Try to put this in your childish little mind: NOTHING WHAT YOU CAN DO OR SAY MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO ME, because I know what you are. Just another lamb following the flock of foil hat morons not realizing how fucking stupid thing it is to do.. ::)
-
So, how many times I have to ask that with your open unbiased mind, just show me the evidence which prove you claims to be facts. How fucking difficult that could be? Wait a minute, there has to be reason why it is so difficult? And we both know what the reason is, because YOU DON'T HAVE ANY FUCKING EVIDENCE.
When you and the foil hat morons of the world will understand, that only right way to argument is do it through the evidence. It isn't enough if you say this and that, you have to prove that what you say is a fact. You never can do that, so you try to criticize my person instead. Wow, I never see that coming...like it is what happens every fucking time when stupid's like you lose the debate. Try to put this in your childish little mind: NOTHING WHAT YOU CAN DO OR SAY MAKES NO DIFFERENCE TO ME, because I know what you are. Just another lamb following the flock of foil hat morons not realizing how fucking stupid thing it is to do.. ::)
I seen internal leaked memos detailing recent events from Westminister.
How do you want me to prove that to you champ because I cant. I only know what I seen and thats my evidence.
Not trying to convince you but you are salivating like a rabid dog at the thought that there very well could be a bigger non disclosed plan.
-
Angry? Did I scare whining little foil hat moron? Oh my, what kind of sissy you are? And what next, will you tell your mama that evil man has tormented you in the internet, while you were chanting your foil hat mantra? Grow up, you girly man.. ;D
Why do you waste your time and energy with these deluded kooks?
-
Ropo Meltdown ;D
-
Download this - WHILE YOU STILL CAN!
Am I too late?
-
Download this - WHILE YOU STILL CAN!
Am I too late?
It is still available. Somehow this one has stayed up for a while. But all previous ones were being deleted by youtube.
-
So these people are trying to wipe out a ton of people to make huge golf courses across the country right?
And eat babies in sacred Reptilian rituals. Totally legit, bro.
-
lol what is with this ropo dude, I can all but feel him thrashing around his keyboard in frustration when reading his posts. Hopefully he can learn to better spend his time and efforts rather than getting so emotionally worked up on the internet.
-
lol what is with this ropo dude, I can all but feel him thrashing around his keyboard in frustration when reading his posts. Hopefully he can learn to better spend his time and efforts rather than getting so emotionally worked up on the internet.
ROPO is an ignorant DOPO.
-
56,244 Views
1024 likes
45 dislikes
Seems some getbiggers are out of touch with reality.
-
56,244 Views
1024 likes
45 dislikes
Seems some getbiggers are out of touch with reality.
OR 45 sane people watched...and 1024 cookaloos watched. That seems about right for the ratio of normal people to batshit crazies running around these days.
-
OR 45 sane people watched...and 1024 cookaloos watched. That seems about right for the ratio of normal people to batshit crazies running around these days.
Of course. Who else is gonna take the time to watch and "like" such fantastical bullshit?
-
(http://www.gifsforum.com/images/image/op%20is%20gay/grand/op-is-gay-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-1554.jpg)
-
OR 45 sane people watched...and 1024 cookaloos watched. That seems about right for the ratio of normal people to batshit crazies running around these days.
Is that what you tell yourself when it's you (1 person) vs 25 people who say you are dumb? They are all crazy and you are the only sane one? LOL Time to take your meds Thick Nick.
-
Is that what you tell yourself when it's you (1 person) vs 25 people who say you are dumb? They are all crazy and you are the only sane one? LOL Time to take your meds Thick Nick.
So you're saying Thick Nick is the looney in the asylum screaming that all the doctors and nurses are crazy and he is sane?
-
Is that what you tell yourself when it's you (1 person) vs 25 people who say you are dumb? They are all crazy and you are the only sane one? LOL Time to take your meds Thick Nick.
You might want to Re read this, and all your threads, to see who people are calling dumb.
-
Thick Nick is it just a crazy conspiracy theory that you have a tiny pencil dick?
-
I seen internal leaked memos detailing recent events from Westminister.
How do you want me to prove that to you champ because I cant. I only know what I seen and thats my evidence.
Not trying to convince you but you are salivating like a rabid dog at the thought that there very well could be a bigger non disclosed plan.
Sounds interesting.
Can you share some insight into what you have seen.
On the board or by PM.
-
Thick Nick is it just a crazy conspiracy theory that you have a tiny pencil dick?
No. There is picture evidence. And how dare you address me directly you dirty foreigner.
Wait... Who are you again?
-
Sounds interesting.
Can you share some insight into what you have seen.
On the board or by PM.
Yes, please share.
-
No. There is picture evidence.
Photoshopped no doubt!
-
Sounds interesting.
Can you share some insight into what you have seen.
On the board or by PM.
Omega can you please send me this file.
-
lol it really is taken down!
-
lol it really is taken down!
OF COURSE IT'S TAKEN DOWN! *rolls eyes* I TOLD YOU IT WOULD BE!!
-
OF COURSE IT'S TAKEN DOWN! *rolls eyes* I TOLD YOU IT WOULD BE!!
LOL calm down Alex Jones ;D
-
LOL calm down Alex Jones ;D
;D
-
As you all know, this video WAS REMOVED as I predicted.
But I have re-posted it in the OP.
We the People shall overcome this evil agenda and these evil people. Stay Strong!!!
-
I seen internal leaked memos detailing recent events from Westminister.
How do you want me to prove that to you champ because I cant. I only know what I seen and thats my evidence.
Not trying to convince you but you are salivating like a rabid dog at the thought that there very well could be a bigger non disclosed plan.
Some mental midget bring up this pile of crap, so lets continue:
"You have seen" isn't any better evidence than saying I heard, I have a feeling etc. because you have no means to prove that you aren't lying. What you obviously are, because if there is something like that to see, every fucking mobile phone has a camera, which every fucking idiot is able to use. If I say that I have seen cows flying, do it prove they fly? If foil hat moron says he have seen XXXX documents with his own eyes, why that should prove more? Only things which have concrete evidence are true. That is the reason why bigfoot is bullshit, UFO:s are bullshit, and every fucking thing which could come in mind of foil hat moron excluding suicide, is bullshit. Have a happy new year ;D
-
Ropo Meltdown ;D
I don't melt down, I laugh to the stupidity of yours and your kind. That kind of stupidity is so serious and overwhelming, that I do not believe it can exist without a serious mental illness or a handicap. As I said in different thread, you and your kind are a product of the internet, because what internet has done, it has given a voice to the incredible stupid people. You see, before the internet, people didn't have any interface to communicate with the idiots, morons and crazy people, and now they are everywhere. What I mean is that if I by some reason would have a need to meet someone really really stupid, I would have to go to some mental institute to see him, but now, here you are. Every day, 24/7, you are at the front of your computer drooling on your keyboard like an idiot you are, and commenting to every fucking bullshit thread which have a potential to be the stupidest foil hat crap ever ;D
-
Riveting.
-
I don't melt down, I laugh to the stupidity of yours and your kind. That kind of stupidity is so serious and overwhelming, that I do not believe it can exist without a serious mental illness or a handicap. As I said in different thread, you and your kind are a product of the internet, because what internet has done, it has given a voice to the incredible stupid people. You see, before the internet, people didn't have any interface to communicate with the idiots, morons and crazy people, and now they are everywhere. What I mean is that if I by some reason would have a need to meet someone really really stupid, I would have to go to some mental institute to see him, but now, here you are. Every day, 24/7, you are at the front of your computer drooling on your keyboard like an idiot you are, and commenting to every fucking bullshit thread which have a potential to be the stupidest foil hat crap ever ;D
LOL dude you are nuts.
-
Made it through 4 minutes......