Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Lord Chronos on January 11, 2015, 03:54:27 AM
-
This guy is hated in the UK for speaking common sense.
-
This guy is hated in the UK for speaking common sense.
Makes sense, hate the dude who hates the haters. Hope that works out for ya, mates.
-
He's far from hated, minorities and students try to label him as a racist while adults and law abiding Muslims see total sense in what he's saying. He could quite easily be the next priminister but and its a big but, short of an immigration policy, I don't thing he has anything else.
-
most europeans are peaceful leftists, you cant do anything. Fucking sheeps will get what they deserve.
-
Not for nothing but... COME ON! "Civilized societies"? The very same societies that decided to bomb Middle Eastern countries back to the Bronze Age because of oil are now calling themselves "civilized"?
It delusion/lunacy at its best.
I have no love for terrorism, but we, as a nation, have to face reality and take ownership of some of the blame for people in those very same countries we have been bombing (on and off) for the past 20 years becoming radicalized beyond belief.
They certainly didn't pop up from out of nowhere. We helped create the monster.
-
most europeans are peaceful leftists, you cant do anything. Fucking sheeps will get what they deserve.
His party are growing in popularity, there's a small chance they could form a coalition with the torys in the next ellection
France has 25% vote for a far right party... Italy has similar leanings
You have never left the states, how would you know?
-
Not for nothing but... COME ON! "Civilized societies"? The very same societies that decided to bomb Middle Eastern countries back to the Bronze Age because of oil are now calling themselves "civilized"?
It delusion/lunacy at its best.
I have no love for terrorism, but we, as a nation, have to face reality and take ownership of some of the blame for people in those very same countries we have been bombing (on and off) for the past 20 years becoming radicalized beyond belief.
They certainly didn't pop up from out of nowhere. We helped create the monster.
I totally agree with you, the west (primarily US/UK) has meddled in the affairs of the middle east for decades, to the point that people there cant remember what normality looks like.
That meddling is the cause of the problem
Terrorist acts are a symptom of that problem. There is a deep seated hatred toward the west amongst some muslims and people in the middle east.
With that said, having Terrorist acts occur on our doorstep, in Europe, with the frequency that they do, is not only a symptom of this meddling but also due to the EU's open door policy in immigration.
If we had strict immigration policies, secure borders across europe, there would be significantly less terrorist events occurring on our doorstep, regardless of whether the west was meddling in the middle eat or not. Uncontrolled mass immigration is a cause of these terrorist events happening here, because it allows both existing terrorists to move freely into countries and it allows large populations of people who have a higher propensity to be radicalized to grow within western countries. If there were no muslims in France, the chances of these events happening would be much reduced.
Labour opened the flood gates in the UK, and we have already experienced our terrorist events on our doorstep.
Labour along with the Lib-Dems can be strung up by the balls as well!
-
His party are growing in popularity, there's a small chance they could form a coalition with the torys in the next ellection
France has 25% vote for a far right party... Italy has similar leanings
You have never left the states, how would you know?
the fuck are you talking about, i m born french and left for canada 6 years ago... If at the time i believed something would change, i wouldnt have left. Too bad i made up my mind and realized it would only get worse over time. And i was right. Europeans are scared sheeps whoa re too affraid to defend themselves because they dont want to be labeled as nazis, they hate themselves and want to disapear flooded by third world immigrants. You cant help someone who doesnt want to be helped.
-
With regard to civilized lands such as the UK, the US and all of Europe:
There will never be a backlash until they find their backbone.
-
His party are growing in popularity, there's a small chance they could form a coalition with the torys in the next ellection
France has 25% vote for a far right party... Italy has similar leanings
You have never left the states, how would you know?
The problem is that far right parties popularity is growing at a rate slower than the immigrant populations.
In France, European french are already a minority within the under 30 population. This means by 2050 when these under 30 population have grown up, european French will be a minority in their own country. The UK is following closely behind with similar statistics.
The cat is out of the bag, it will probably take another decade before a far right wing party will gain popularity, but by that time, this under 30 population will start to affect the voting stats, essentially the support will rise for the far right, it will peak before it can get into power, and then the majority immigrant population will dilute their votes, by supporting other parties, so they never get in.
Once immigrant populations reach a significant voting size, the wheels will fall off Europe completely!
-
Your a frog?... Id never have guessed...
Do you not think that 25% will grow?, by the way all western countries have the same policies... Just swap mexicants with Arabs in the states etc etc
Canada is too cold for that kinda shit
-
I totally agree with you, the west (primarily US/UK) has meddled in the affairs of the middle east for decades, to the point that people there cant remember what normality looks like.
That meddling is the cause of the problem
Terrorist acts are a symptom of that problem. There is a deep seated hatred toward the west amongst some muslims and people in the middle east.
With that said, having Terrorist acts occur on our doorstep, in Europe, with the frequency that they do, is not only a symptom of this meddling but also due to the EU's open door policy in immigration.
If we had strict immigration policies, secure borders across europe, there would be significantly less terrorist events occurring on our doorstep, regardless of whether the west was meddling in the middle eat or not. Uncontrolled mass immigration is a cause of these terrorist events happening here, because it allows both existing terrorists to move freely into countries and it allows large populations of people who have a higher propensity to be radicalized to grow within western countries. If there were no muslims in France, the chances of these events happening would be much reduced.
Labour opened the flood gates in the UK, and we have already experienced our terrorist events on our doorstep.
Labour along with the Lib-Dems can be strung up by the balls as well!
Ah, so no meddling and all is well with the peaceful Muslims.
Got it.
-
The problem is that far right parties popularity is growing at a rate slower than the immigrant populations.
In France, European french are already a minority within the under 30 population. This means by 2050 when these under 30 population have grown up, european French will be a minority in their own country. The UK is following closely behind with similar statistics.
The cat is out of the bag, it will probably take another decade before a far right wing party will gain popularity, but by that time, this under 30 population will start to affect the voting stats, essentially the support will rise for the far right, it will peak before it can get into power, and then the majority immigrant population will dilute their votes, by supporting other parties, so they never get in.
Once immigrant populations reach a significant voting size, the wheels will fall off Europe completely!
That's a scary scenario... I don't see a practical solution either...
-
Ah, so no meddling and all is well with the peaceful Muslims.
Got it.
No offense, but that's not what I said.
What I said was that if we had not meddled and bombed the shit out of them for decades, and kept our borders secure and our immigration in check, we would not be dealing with this shit today. Simple as that.
-
That's a scary scenario... I don't see a practical solution either...
No I don't see a solution either, you can already see, the political bias among immigrants in most European countries, they never vote for conservatives, they always vote for the liberals or the left, whilst their own culture is extremely conservative and discriminatory. Kind of ironic isn't it.
Canada will get it as well, they are bringing in lots of Somalians and other 3rd world turds, they have more space and are not so far down the line. Perhaps they have more chance of turning shit around, but I doubt it. Australia is in the same boat too.
-
No offense, but that's not what I said.
What I said was that if we had not meddled and bombed the shit out of them for decades, and kept our borders secure and our immigration in check, we would not be dealing with this shit today. Simple as that.
"Terrorist acts are a symptom of the problem," the problem being meddling. So it would follow, pre-meddling = zero terrorism. Might wanna let them know.
Of course, your types (no offense) have a very liberal definition of meddling.
-
"Terrorist acts are a symptom of the problem," the problem being meddling. So it would follow, pre-meddling = zero terrorism. Might wanna let them know.
Of course, your types (no offense) have a very liberal definition of meddling.
Ok, tell me what "type" I am.
-
That's a scary scenario... I don't see a practical solution either...
That's fine. Your future Muslim-France/England can terrorize each other and our Mexican-America until Jebus does his encore.
-
"Terrorist acts are a symptom of the problem," the problem being meddling. So it would follow, pre-meddling = zero terrorism. Might wanna let them know.
Of course, your types (no offense) have a very liberal definition of meddling.
De stabslising, overthrowing governments and standing by isreal is some big time meddling...
The US were hell bent on overthrowing Iran not too long ago, now suddenly they are 'good' guys...
-
Ok, tell me what "type" I am.
Seriously?
Apologist. Why you playing dumb?
All due respect.
-
De stabslising, overthrowing governments and standing by isreal is some big time meddling...
The US were hell bent on overthrowing Iran not too long ago, now suddenly they are 'good' guys...
Politics makes for strange bedfellows, etc.
-
De stabslising, overthrowing governments and standing by isreal is some big time meddling...
The US were hell bent on overthrowing Iran not too long ago, now suddenly they are 'good' guys...
Ah, knew it was coming. There's the meddling. Our fault, got it.
-
"Terrorist acts are a symptom of the problem," the problem being meddling. So it would follow, pre-meddling = zero terrorism. Might wanna let them know.
Of course, your types (no offense) have a very liberal definition of meddling.
So it would follow, pre-meddling = zero terrorism. You made that statement not me.
Clearly I can see your "type" is one that struggles with reading and comprehending things. Quite surprising for someone with so many posts, but then perhaps that explains something in itself.
What I did say was that if we had secure borders, and a tight immigration policy, we would not have to deal with terrorist events on our doorstep, or at least not to the frequency that they have been occurring.
Equally so, if for the past 50 years the west had not waged so many wars in the middle east, the potential for anger and animosity towards the US and UK would be much reduced and probably lead to less radicalization and terrorist events. If this was not true, then why have so many terrorist attacks been carried out in retribution for Western interventions in middle eastern countries ??????
-
Ah, knew it was coming. There's the meddling. Our fault, got it.
Fuck off ( no offence ).... Its all part of the big picture, we act in our intrests and always have done, does it make killing innocents, chopping off heads and hands of peace justified? Of course not...
You could wipe the lot of them off the planet for all I care, you can't sugar coat history tho
-
Seriously?
Apologist. Why you playing dumb?
All due respect.
LOL ;D
Apologist ::)
Stating realities of a situation does not make me an apologist, but clearly with your limited reading abilities, its easy for you to make such a mistake. No Offense!
-
Islamic State are nothing but a bunch of local warlords who were funded by the US to help fight Saddam Hussein and now have gone rogue, taking advantage of the porous northern borders of Iraq and Syria and an abundance of oil to finance their activities. They have plenty of cash and control a population already accustomed to terror by the likes of Bashar al-Assad and Saddam Hussein. So, knowing nothing but terror, it's no wonder they would so happily succumb to IE (unless you're not their cup of tea of course).
The seed of democracy is certainly NOT going to sprout there, no matter how many times we bomb them or who we put in power.
-
So it would follow, pre-meddling = zero terrorism. You made that statement not me.
Clearly I can see your "type" is one that struggles with reading and comprehending things. Quite surprising for someone with so many posts, but then perhaps that explains something in itself.
What I did say was
That meddling is the cause of the problem
Terrorist acts are a symptom of that problem. There is a deep seated hatred toward the west amongst some muslims and people in the middle east.
My fault, I assumed you meant what you typed. Sorry, I do this a lot. I struggle with reading and comprehending things, so I'm sure you can understand.
-
Seriously?
Apologist. Why you playing dumb?
All due respect.
I find the word "apologist" a bit funny.
In a very Clotaire Rapaillian way, if you want cheap oil, just go in and fucking get it. Say "I'm here for the oil, ya'll can chop each other's head off as much as you want, but 'sell' me the the oil at $5/barrel or else". That's what real men do. If you look at, for example, duels, you establish hostilities from the get go and end it with a duel. One of you dies and the other gets to live. That's what men do, at least the macho men you seem to so much adore.
I, for one, love my kids and do not mind paying $6 for a gallon of gas. If you want to pursue the macho man bullshit story, put your bundle of joy in a military uniform and send him to downtown Mosul and see how quickly your "apologist" bullshit story comes to an end.
Please understand that bravado is a sign of immaturity. You're certainly not impressing me.
-
I find the word "apologist" a bit funny.
In a very Clotaire Rapaillian way, if you want cheap oil, just go in and fucking get it. Say "I'm here for the oil, ya'll can chop each other's head off as much as you want, but 'sell' me the the oil at $5/barrel or else". That's what real men do. If you look at, for example, duels, you establish hostilities from the get go and end it with a duel. One of you dies and the other gets to live. That's what men do, at least the macho men you seem to so much adore.
I, for one, love my kids and do not mind paying $6 for a gallon of gas. If you want to pursue the macho man bullshit story, put your bundle of joy in a military uniform and send him to downtown Mosul and see how quickly your "apologist" bullshit story comes to an end.
Please understand that bravado is a sign of immaturity. You're certainly not impressing me.
Faggót!
Oil or Israel, now I'm confused. Both? Or is it Mohammad cartoons? Hmm. All? Damn. Maybe we should ask them for a list of grievances so we can live correctly, safe from their wrath. All will be fine then?
How many excuses you wanna ante up, apologist?
-
If we had not meddled and bombed the shit out of them for decades, and kept our borders secure and our immigration in check, we would not be dealing with this shit today. Simple as that.
This.
Don't interfere in their countries and let them run them as they wish, while preventing them immigrating here in large numbers. If this was done, there would be no problems.
Instead, the UK has done the opposite. Obviously, allowing millions of Muslims into the UK while bombing the shit out of their homelands isn't that wise an idea. :-\
-
Oil or Israel, now I'm confused. Both? Or is it Mohammad cartoons? Hmm. All? Damn. Maybe we should ask them for a list of grievances so we can live correctly, safe from their wrath. All will be fine then?
How many excuses you wanna ante up, apologist?
"Slapper" would just hit UFC Light Heavyweight Champion with 3 or 4 quick leg sweeps and watch him fall like a house of cards.
-
"Slapper" would just hit UFC Light Heavyweight Champion with 3 or 4 quick leg sweeps and watch him fall like a house of cards.
That sorta bravado is a sign of immaturity, doubt he'd partake.
-
"Slapper" demonstrates immaturity beyond belief.
-
The problem is that far right parties popularity is growing at a rate slower than the immigrant populations.
couldnt have said it better.
-
Makes sense, hate the dude who hates the haters. Hope that works out for ya, mates.
Creating/inspiring terrorism isn't working out great for the west in general.
-
This.
Don't interfere in their countries and let them run them as they wish, while preventing them immigrating here in large numbers. If this was done, there would be no problems.
Instead, the UK has done the opposite. Obviously, allowing millions of Muslims into the UK while bombing the shit out of their homelands isn't that wise an idea. :-\
France of course have reep what they sew when they decided to colonize.
The thing is, at the infant stages of globalism, we all "meddle" somehow---the West needs oil, the Middle East has it. This all helps in a complex and convoluted "meddling problem". The rich guys in the Middle East want Western goods---cars, etc. Poor Middle Easterners can't afford it. They don't blame the rich guys in their countries. They blame the west. They come to the West, want a western life style, many have limited education. And many of the Europrean nations being the Socialist countries that they are, believe that they are helping said people---and bend over backwards for them. Many of said people come from a culture that looks down upon people who are too kind, and resent the former colonists. And they refuse to assimilate or integrate into society. Many fall on hard times, lack of education, conformity and living in ghettoes.
Put all this together, and you have a very, very potent potpourri of problems.
-
The problem is that far right parties popularity is growing at a rate slower than the immigrant populations.
In France, European french are already a minority within the under 30 population. This means by 2050 when these under 30 population have grown up, european French will be a minority in their own country. The UK is following closely behind with similar statistics.
The cat is out of the bag, it will probably take another decade before a far right wing party will gain popularity, but by that time, this under 30 population will start to affect the voting stats, essentially the support will rise for the far right, it will peak before it can get into power, and then the majority immigrant population will dilute their votes, by supporting other parties, so they never get in.
Once immigrant populations reach a significant voting size, the wheels will fall off Europe completely!
That's also a strategy for the leftist. They import voters for themselves.
Eventually some of the european countries like France, England, Sweden will have whites as minorities in their own country.
What they the leftists are too stupid to realize is that it's the peoples that makes the counties and quality of living. Eventually the countries will regress to the same standard of living as where the immigrants came from.
-
France of course have reep what they sew when they decided to colonize.
The thing is, at the infant stages of globalism, we all "meddle" somehow---the West needs oil, the Middle East has it. This all helps in a complex and convoluted "meddling problem". The rich guys in the Middle East want Western goods---cars, etc. Poor Middle Easterners can't afford it. They don't blame the rich guys in their countries. They blame the west. They come to the West, want a western life style, many have limited education. And many of the Europrean nations being the Socialist countries that they are, believe that they are helping said people---and bend over backwards for them. Many of said people come from a culture that looks down upon people who are too kind, and resent the former colonists. And they refuse to assimilate or integrate into society. Many fall on hard times, lack of education, conformity and living in ghettoes.
Put all this together, and you have a very, very potent potpourri of problems.
Worked for Scoob and the gang.
-
Already some conspiracy theories
-
Already some conspiracy theories
Yeah... they decided "Let's kill a bunch of civilians for REAL and then stage a killing of a cop (to make it even more convinceable)." ::)
-
That's also a strategy for the leftist. They import voters for themselves.
Eventually some of the european countries like France, England, Sweden will have whites as minorities in their own country.
What they the leftists are too stupid to realize is that it's the peoples that makes the counties and quality of living. Eventually the countries will regress to the same standard of living as where the immigrants came from.
Can someone defend this? What I mean is, give a reason that this is okay. I don't understand why they think this way.
-
Oil or Israel, now I'm confused. Both? Or is it Mohammad cartoons? Hmm. All? Damn. Maybe we should ask them for a list of grievances so we can live correctly, safe from their wrath. All will be fine then?
How many excuses you wanna ante up, apologist?
I honestly don't give a shit about Israel. Why should I? Why not Tunisia? Or Bahrain? Or Oman?
The main issue is that the Middle East hasn't been THIS radicalized in decades. And it's no surprise there is ample American presence in the area. Those of you who choose to believe that the radicalism exists because Islam exists and ignore the fact that the area has been oozing with American military campaigns that have actually killed, passively and actively, hundreds of thousands of human beings, be my guests.
My opinion, for one, is based on the fucking obvious, aka, cheap oil.
-
This.
Don't interfere in their countries and let them run them as they wish, while preventing them immigrating here in large numbers. If this was done, there would be no problems.
Instead, the UK has done the opposite. Obviously, allowing millions of Muslims into the UK while bombing the shit out of their homelands isn't that wise an idea. :-\
Exactly, leave them alone. Let them carry out their own revolutions. Let them find out how screwed up religions are.
Build a state of the art fence and do not let them into your country. Eventually desperation becomes revolution and these Islamic Estate fuckers will pay for it dearly. But let the locals do it.
-
Exactly, leave them alone. Let them carry out their own revolutions. Let them find out how screwed up religions are.
Build a state of the art fence and do not let them into your country. Eventually desperation becomes revolution and these Islamic Estate fuckers will pay for it dearly. But let the locals do it.
Unfortunately, just "leaving them alone" doesn't work when they have resources that you need. And when said people immigrate to your countries, or request help. Or when said countries want to join the UN. It's like when you were kids and the said kids want to play with you. And you say, "ok, these are the rules to the game..." And then when you see said kid who is now on your team, and you notice a black eye---you ask and it is from their parent. So, as a kid, are you going to ignore someone on your team whose parent is giving them black eyes?
-
France should have seen this coming their way a long time ago.....now, they will stop being soft on these fucking Fanatics
-
Unfortunately, just "leaving them alone" doesn't work when they have resources that you need. And when said people immigrate to your countries, or request help. Or when said countries want to join the UN. It's like when you were kids and the said kids want to play with you. And you say, "ok, these are the rules to the game..." And then when you see said kid who is now on your team, and you notice a black eye---you ask and it is from their parent. So, as a kid, are you going to ignore someone on your team whose parent is giving them black eyes?
Doesn't work for who?
-
Doesn't work for who?
Leaving people "alone" will not work for Europe or the US.
Especially, when you are asked for help. Or have to deal with them on a world stage. Or the fact that you may be responsible for the issues at hand. Just saying "I am going to leave you alone now" just doesn't cut it.
-
I honestly don't give a shit about Israel. Why should I? Why not Tunisia? Or Bahrain? Or Oman?
The main issue is that the Middle East hasn't been THIS radicalized in decades. And it's no surprise there is ample American presence in the area. Those of you who choose to believe that the radicalism exists because Islam exists and ignore the fact that the area has been oozing with American military campaigns that have actually killed, passively and actively, hundreds of thousands of human beings, be my guests.
My opinion, for one, is based on the fucking obvious, aka, cheap oil.
Cheap oil, that's it. All to save a few pennies at the gas station. So simple.
-
The CIA seems to think Western involvement in the Middle East has something do to with terrorist events by said Middle Eastern people. In fact they have a word for it 'Blowback'.
"Originally, blowback was CIA internal coinage denoting the unintended, harmful consequences—to friendly populations and military forces.
In formal print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953, the CIA's internal history of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, sponsored by the US and UK, which was published in March 1954.[2][3] Blowback from this operation would indeed occur with the Iranian Revolution and the Iran hostage crisis."
Religious crazies are crazy and Islam leads at the top of them for violence and intolerance. It's a perfect storm to have occupying powers and wars on their "holy lands" for 100 years. It doesn't justify their violence but it does add perspective.
-
The CIA seems to think Western involvement in the Middle East has something do to with terrorist events by said Middle Eastern people. In fact they have a word for it 'Blowback'.
"Originally, blowback was CIA internal coinage denoting the unintended, harmful consequences—to friendly populations and military forces.
In formal print usage, the term blowback first appeared in the Clandestine Service History—Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran—November 1952–August 1953, the CIA's internal history of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, sponsored by the US and UK, which was published in March 1954.[2][3] Blowback from this operation would indeed occur with the Iranian Revolution and the Iran hostage crisis."
Religious crazies are crazy and Islam leads at the top of them for violence and intolerance. It's a perfect storm to have occupying powers and wars on their "holy lands" for 100 years. It doesn't justify their violence but it does add perspective.
Sophomore year in college, we were reading a book called Blowback the semester 9/11 happened. I remember everyone freaking out because the book specifically named Bin Laden.
-
Leaving people "alone" will not work for Europe or the US.
Especially, when you are asked for help. Or have to deal with them on a world stage. Or the fact that you may be responsible for the issues at hand. Just saying "I am going to leave you alone now" just doesn't cut it.
Who says it won't work for Europe or the US? Since when were you given the honorary role of informing folks of what works, or not, for Europeans or Americans? Don't hide behind slogans. And don't do to other people what you wouldn't want done onto you. It's as simple as that. We have the resources at hand, right now, to kick oil to the kerb in less than 50 years. We're in the Middle East ONLY because oil companies and out government are playing geo-political battles that are obviously backfiring on us.
Anything else is a slogan from Fucks (Fox).
-
Cheap oil, that's it. All to save a few pennies at the gas station. So simple.
You certainly do not believe that we are there to spread democracy right? Saying that we are in Iraq or Afghanistan to help democracy is like saying we came up with a way to makes homos straight again.
Don't fool yourself.
-
You certainly do not believe that we are there to spread democracy right? Saying that we are in Iraq or Afghanistan to help democracy is like saying we came up with a way to makes homos straight again.
Don't fool yourself.
As long as we're thinking for each other ...
You certainly do not believe that oil just means gas for a grocery run, right? Allow tyrants to cripple the civilized world?
Don't fool yourself.
-
Find some magical way to get keep populations from collasping without immigrants and you might have a point otherwise move along.
-
That's also a strategy for the leftist. They import voters for themselves.
Eventually some of the european countries like France, England, Sweden will have whites as minorities in their own country.
What they the leftists are too stupid to realize is that it's the peoples that makes the counties and quality of living. Eventually the countries will regress to the same standard of living as where the immigrants came from.
Same thing liberals are doing in the southern US with not enforcing illegal immigration laws.
-
Can someone defend this? What I mean is, give a reason that this is okay. I don't understand why they think this way.
No they can't. But they will defend it. There is no reasoning with some of these liberals. They'd rather die than admit their policies and beliefs are a failure.
-
That's also a strategy for the leftist. They import voters for themselves.
Eventually some of the european countries like France, England, Sweden will have whites as minorities in their own country.
What they the leftists are too stupid to realize is that it's the peoples that makes the counties and quality of living. Eventually the countries will regress to the same standard of living as where the immigrants came from.
Agreed. It's insane but I guess they are blind or being misled.
-
Who says it won't work for Europe or the US? Since when were you given the honorary role of informing folks of what works, or not, for Europeans or Americans? Don't hide behind slogans. And don't do to other people what you wouldn't want done onto you. It's as simple as that. We have the resources at hand, right now, to kick oil to the kerb in less than 50 years. We're in the Middle East ONLY because oil companies and out government are playing geo-political battles that are obviously backfiring on us.
Anything else is a slogan from Fucks (Fox).
Too late in the game. That's why it doesn't work. Please give reasons why it would work. I have giving reasons why it wouldn't. And please give examples on when it did.
Plus, if his whole "globalization" being pushed down everybody's throat the option of "leave them alone" doesn't work. Then there are the human right's violations, UN, all the other stuff.
It seems to me that you advocate isolationism, which will fail in his world.
There are no real solutions to getting off oil. Electricity is one, but expensive, and they still figuring out how to get better storage, and then there is the rare earth metals/minerals that are needed. And guess where there is a large concentration of it? Afghanistan. Oh, so just "leave them alone" right? The Chinese aren't thinking that. In fact, China is eating the US lunch, engaging in many countries in Latin America and Africa---countries which are deemed off limits by American ccompanies and businesses due to political regimes and human right's violations.
There is also hydrogen fuel cells, which many countries are investing in.
Oh, and think you know that oil companies have big lobbies, and buy up a lot of tech that could help us...
And then you are forgetting one big thing, people travel. You want to forbid certain people from traveling or moving to certain areas? You see, you open up a Pandora's box of problems when take a "leave them alone" stance.
And one more thing, FDR didn't want to get involve in in the war, even when Churchill asked him, and it took some building of friendship.
What would have happened if FDR had said, "The Germans are Europe's problem"?
Leave them alone...yep, that works wonders doesn't it.
-
My fault, I assumed you meant what you typed. Sorry, I do this a lot. I struggle with reading and comprehending things, so I'm sure you can understand.
Glad you came to your senses and realised you are a dumb fuck ;D
-
Too late in the game. That's why it doesn't work. Please give reasons why it would work. I have giving reasons why it wouldn't. And please give examples on when it did.
Plus, if his whole "globalization" being pushed down everybody's throat the option of "leave them alone" doesn't work. Then there are the human right's violations, UN, all the other stuff.
It seems to me that you advocate isolationism, which will fail in his world.
There are no real solutions to getting off oil. Electricity is one, but expensive, and they still figuring out how to get better storage, and then there is the rare earth metals/minerals that are needed. And guess where there is a large concentration of it? Afghanistan. Oh, so just "leave them alone" right? The Chinese aren't thinking that. In fact, China is eating the US lunch, engaging in many countries in Latin America and Africa---countries which are deemed off limits by American ccompanies and businesses due to political regimes and human right's violations.
There is also hydrogen fuel cells, which many countries are investing in.
Oh, and think you know that oil companies have big lobbies, and buy up a lot of tech that could help us...
And then you are forgetting one big thing, people travel. You want to forbid certain people from traveling or moving to certain areas? You see, you open up a Pandora's box of problems when take a "leave them alone" stance.
And one more thing, FDR didn't want to get involve in in the war, even when Churchill asked him, and it took some building of friendship.
What would have happened if FDR had said, "The Germans are Europe's problem"?
Leave them alone...yep, that works wonders doesn't it.
Says who it's too late in the game?
-
I like Nigel Farage. European parliament needs more like him.
-
far right will NEVER lead in any country.
-
That's also a strategy for the leftist. They import voters for themselves.
Eventually some of the european countries like France, England, Sweden will have whites as minorities in their own country.
What they the leftists are too stupid to realize is that it's the peoples that makes the counties and quality of living. Eventually the countries will regress to the same standard of living as where the immigrants came from.
THIS IS THE KEY POINT RIGHT HERE!!!
this is what these leftist clowns dont get-and its the same thing happening to the southwestern united states with mexico-if you allow millions of third worlders to flood into your nation, they will not assimilate to you-they will simply remake the nation in their own image. in other words, WE will assimilate to THEM.
A nation is a reflection of the people and the culture that created it. if we overwhelm a nation with people who have only ever created third world nations, then your nation will eventually become a third world nation.
-
In the end what's the point of multi-culturalism anyways? Why does the USA allow hundreds of thousands of Asians, Africans, Indians etc... to move and live here? At which point isn't it good enough to just leave people where they are? I understand intially that allowing it helped grow certain countries but what benefit is there to allow poor ass people leave their poor ass countries to come here and mooch? Who does it benefit? The USA is now over 300 million people. What benefit is there to have it grow to 400 or 500 million? Why is there an open door to the rest of the world?
-
In the end what's the point of multi-culturalism anyways? Why does the USA allow hundreds of thousands of Asians, Africans, Indians etc... to move and live here? At which point isn't it good enough to just leave people where they are? I understand intially that allowing it helped grow certain countries but what benefit is there to allow poor ass people leave their poor ass countries to come here and mooch? Who does it benefit? The USA is now over 300 million people. What benefit is there to have it grow to 400 or 500 million? Why is there an open door to the rest of the world?
it benefits no one but the impovershed foreigners themselves, and pleases the liberal mindset.
the fact that it is of NO benefit at all to our own nation and actually hurts/drains the average american citizen is of ZERO concern to the two groups above.
-
it benefits no one but the impovershed foreigners themselves, and pleases the liberal mindset.
the fact that it is of NO benefit at all to our own nation and actually hurts/drains the average american citizen is of ZERO concern to the two groups above.
Cheap labour, lowers bottom end wages also