Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 01:40:07 PM

Title: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 01:40:07 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dMqF2ccL7c4/VVellLWul8I/AAAAAAAR7bw/lYOoPjmTCKw/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-15.jpg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PRMX2tJDpl0/VVelmMOvCII/AAAAAAAR7cM/ADI4yRFNZSU/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-19.jpg)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--c0AJk_4LS8/VVelhfXiJxI/AAAAAAAR7aQ/aoKWZMVjkVA/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-01.jpg)

Carscoops
[snip]
Change is the story under the hood, however. A 2.0-liter turbo four from the ATS and CTS is the base engine now, producing 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft. of torque. GM says it's capable of 30 MPG on the highway, but with a 0-60 time of less than 6 seconds. It's substantially less powerful than the 2.3-liter turbo four Mustang Ecoboost, but that engine isn't the Ford's base powertrain.

Camaro buyers who want more than a four, no matter how torquey, will be offered an upgrade to a new 3.6-liter V6 with 330 horsepower, up slightly over the outgoing 3.6 base engine. It's a new design that will also be available in the 2016 Cadillac CT6 sedan.

But traditional muscle car fans will look to the 2016 Camaro SS and its 6.2-liter LT1 V8 out of the Corvette. Here it makes a stout 455 horsepower with either a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic – as the other two engines will be. The Camaro SS gets modern tricks to go with its old-fashioned brawn, too, in the form of magnetic ride control. Selectable driving modes will make their way onto the Camaro line for the first time. And the company says the SS will be capable of better lap times than the old 1LE could manage. The SS manual also gets a new rev-match system to make those downshifts smoother.

http://www.carscoops.com/2015/05/the-2016-chevrolet-camaro-has-been.html (http://www.carscoops.com/2015/05/the-2016-chevrolet-camaro-has-been.html)

Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The Scott on May 16, 2015, 01:41:36 PM
Oh...my...By the Belly of the Buddha!

I may just have to trade in my beloved Mustang.  That is nice!
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: funk51 on May 16, 2015, 01:52:21 PM
real men drive these. ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 01:52:43 PM
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BnfFKYQXwv8/VVera8V153I/AAAAAAAR7gc/iubtN4tUV5c/s1600/Camaro-Live-6.jpg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-oY_OIP4-quw/VVeraJ69m_I/AAAAAAAR7f8/izah2tgLujU/s1600/Camaro-Live-3.jpg)

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bTj0IPeOlWk/VVeliIRjphI/AAAAAAAR7ac/YKaD8bFNAy0/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-04.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Waller on May 16, 2015, 01:53:51 PM
I wonder if Henessy will do the 2016 too..

Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The Scott on May 16, 2015, 01:54:29 PM
real men drive these. ::) ::) ::) ::)

"Diamond in the back, sunroof top, digging the scene with a gangster lean..." ;D
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 01:58:08 PM


Looks like it can corner too.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: HTexan on May 16, 2015, 02:00:40 PM
ugly as fuck :'(
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 02:12:38 PM
ugly as fuck :'(

Do you like the current Camaro?  This isn't much different.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 16, 2015, 02:31:58 PM
Would hit!
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 16, 2015, 02:39:57 PM
Mustang vs Corvette vs?
Supposedly the Challenger/Charger gets a new chassis in a few yrs
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Skylge on May 16, 2015, 02:41:36 PM
Facelift?
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr Anabolic on May 16, 2015, 02:53:53 PM
You can have the 2016, I'll take this one...

(https://cdn2.3dtuning.com/info/Chevrolet%20Camaro%20SS%201969%20Coupe/factory/3.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Bevo on May 16, 2015, 03:08:31 PM
Looks like im gonna trade in my Bentley..... Nope
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Irongrip400 on May 16, 2015, 03:16:30 PM
Thread is worthless because it wasn't started by Parker.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: forillagorilla on May 16, 2015, 03:23:28 PM
Looks like im gonna trade in my Bentley..... Nope

Post picks of your Bentley
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The_Punisher on May 16, 2015, 03:28:54 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dMqF2ccL7c4/VVellLWul8I/AAAAAAAR7bw/lYOoPjmTCKw/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-15.jpg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PRMX2tJDpl0/VVelmMOvCII/AAAAAAAR7cM/ADI4yRFNZSU/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-19.jpg)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--c0AJk_4LS8/VVelhfXiJxI/AAAAAAAR7aQ/aoKWZMVjkVA/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-01.jpg)

Carscoops
[snip]
Change is the story under the hood, however. A 2.0-liter turbo four from the ATS and CTS is the base engine now, producing 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft. of torque. GM says it's capable of 30 MPG on the highway, but with a 0-60 time of less than 6 seconds. It's substantially less powerful than the 2.3-liter turbo four Mustang Ecoboost, but that engine isn't the Ford's base powertrain.

Camaro buyers who want more than a four, no matter how torquey, will be offered an upgrade to a new 3.6-liter V6 with 330 horsepower, up slightly over the outgoing 3.6 base engine. It's a new design that will also be available in the 2016 Cadillac CT6 sedan.

But traditional muscle car fans will look to the 2016 Camaro SS and its 6.2-liter LT1 V8 out of the Corvette. Here it makes a stout 455 horsepower with either a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic – as the other two engines will be. The Camaro SS gets modern tricks to go with its old-fashioned brawn, too, in the form of magnetic ride control. Selectable driving modes will make their way onto the Camaro line for the first time. And the company says the SS will be capable of better lap times than the old 1LE could manage. The SS manual also gets a new rev-match system to make those downshifts smoother.

http://www.carscoops.com/2015/05/the-2016-chevrolet-camaro-has-been.html (http://www.carscoops.com/2015/05/the-2016-chevrolet-camaro-has-been.html)





it's a Hit....I Dig.....the interior from previous models was as shitty as it gets....this new interior design gets an A.......let's see how this new Camaro will do in sales.....they've been beating Ponies in sales from the last couple of years
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: SF1900 on May 16, 2015, 03:33:12 PM
Why would anyone buy an American car these days?  :-\ :-\
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The_Punisher on May 16, 2015, 03:33:24 PM
Mustang vs Corvette vs?
Supposedly the Challenger/Charger gets a new chassis in a few yrs

Challenger is boring as fuck....they need to put some excitement when they redesign it......it's sad that many people won't recognize a hellcat vs a stock challenger
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The True Adonis on May 16, 2015, 03:55:56 PM
Why would anyone buy an American car these days?  :-\ :-\
USA still makes some of the very best cars.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: SF1900 on May 16, 2015, 03:58:40 PM
USA still makes some of the very best cars.

I was under the impression that the quality of their cars went down over the past few years. Im not a car guy, so maybe they have made a comeback. Or maybe they were never bad to begin with.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: SOMEPARTS on May 16, 2015, 04:02:56 PM
real men drive these. ::) ::) ::) ::)



I saw one of those yesterday out on the road...no shit.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The True Adonis on May 16, 2015, 04:08:40 PM
I was under the impression that the quality of their cars went down over the past few years. Im not a car guy, so maybe they have made a comeback. Or maybe they were never bad to begin with.
Never bad to begin with.

It was just a very bad meme.  In all honesty Honda sucks these days as far as reliability is concerned.  At least according to longevity tests in Consumer Reports, Motor Trend, Car and Driver and other online sources.  :D
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: SF1900 on May 16, 2015, 04:17:31 PM
Never bad to begin with.

It was just a very bad meme.  In all honesty Honda sucks these days as far as reliability is concerned.  At least according to longevity tests in Consumer Reports, Motor Trend, Car and Driver and other online sources.  :D

Ive had a Honda for years, and never no problems. Maybe its gone down hill recently, but my car is just fine.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: ritch on May 16, 2015, 04:21:28 PM
looks a lot like a Mustang. But the Chevy logo cheapens the car. Would never buy a chevy because of it. I'm not a car guy at all, but fuck me it's a "walmart" type logo.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Rambone on May 16, 2015, 04:22:20 PM
Post picks of your Bentley

It's in the shop getting a footprint gas pedal installed
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: APE907 on May 16, 2015, 04:28:08 PM
Still too big/heavy.  Interior probably blows chunks too (as does the Mustang).

Love American cubic inch power but Camaro needs to go on diet, upscale the interior and ditch the Transformers era look.  Car is long in the tooth even though its V8 power train is impressive.

Americans CAN build great cars.....see C7, uprated Z06, CTS-V.  

Camaro needs more drastic change than this.  Turbo 4s are just gay in Mustang/Camaro.  They can be great in appropriate platforms....Mustang/Camaro are not best platform for turbo 4 IMO.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The True Adonis on May 16, 2015, 04:47:17 PM
Ive had a Honda for years, and never no problems. Maybe its gone down hill recently, but my car is just fine.
All cars will be fine if you drive them normal and keep up maintenance.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 16, 2015, 05:10:23 PM
Still too big/heavy.  Interior probably blows chunks too (as does the Mustang).

Love American cubic inch power but Camaro needs to go on diet, upscale the interior and ditch the Transformers era look.  Car is long in the tooth even though its V8 power train is impressive.

Americans CAN build great cars.....see C7, uprated Z06, CTS-V.  

Camaro needs more drastic change than this.  Turbo 4s are just gay in Mustang/Camaro.  They can be great in appropriate platforms....Mustang/Camaro are not best platform for turbo 4 IMO.
Turbo 4 in Camaro is base engine. In Mustang it's the mid level engine. They have to do turbo's (4s and 6s) for "economy" requirements that in real life the turbo engines don't really meet.
The people who pick the base engines (V6 in Mustang) don't really care about performance, but more so to looks. Also, the base cars go into fleets.

That Ford Ecoboost 4 is a beast. And the BMW M2 was going to get a turbo 4 at one time.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: APE907 on May 16, 2015, 05:18:12 PM
Turbo 4 in Camaro is base engine. In Mustang it's the mid level engine. They have to do turbo's (4s and 6s) for "economy" requirements that in real life the turbo engines don't really meet.
The people who pick the base engines (V6 in Mustang) don't really care about performance, but more so to looks. Also, the base cars go into fleets.

That Ford Ecoboost 4 is a beast. And the BMW M2 was going to get a turbo 4 at one time.

I get it. Doesn't mean I have to like it.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 05:30:33 PM
Still too big/heavy.  Interior probably blows chunks too (as does the Mustang).

Love American cubic inch power but Camaro needs to go on diet, upscale the interior and ditch the Transformers era look.  Car is long in the tooth even though its V8 power train is impressive.

Americans CAN build great cars.....see C7, uprated Z06, CTS-V.  

Camaro needs more drastic change than this.  Turbo 4s are just gay in Mustang/Camaro.  They can be great in appropriate platforms....Mustang/Camaro are not best platform for turbo 4 IMO.

Turbo 4's are perfectly fine in a Mustang or Camaro.  Motortrend got a 0 to 60 time of 5.6 seconds on the turbo Mustang.  This car lost 200 pounds over the previous model.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 05:39:52 PM
Why would anyone buy an American car these days?  :-\ :-\

American trucks are still Detroit iron.  The cars aren't as reliable as Japanese cars, but the parts are cheap, available, and any mechanic can fix them.  Anything with a small block chevy engine is great because the rebuilt engines can be bought for less than 2K and you can get 300k miles out of them.  That's the secret to why there are so many old pickups still driving on the road.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 16, 2015, 05:50:07 PM
I get it. Doesn't mean I have to like it.
;D
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: APE907 on May 16, 2015, 05:56:07 PM
Turbo 4's are perfectly fine in a Mustang or Camaro.  Motortrend got a 0 to 60 time of 5.6 seconds on the turbo Mustang.  This car lost 200 pounds over the previous model.

I like turbo 4 in WRX and like minded vehicles. 

A V8 is just part of the experience with Mustang/Camaro.  Heritage blah blah.....it actually does matter with these two models.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Bevo on May 16, 2015, 06:17:27 PM
Post picks of your Bentley

Post pics of your cock first
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Bevo on May 16, 2015, 06:18:47 PM
It's in the shop getting a footprint gas pedal installed

 :D ;D
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 16, 2015, 07:30:31 PM
I like turbo 4 in WRX and like minded vehicles. 

A V8 is just part of the experience with Mustang/Camaro.  Heritage blah blah.....it actually does matter with these two models.

The first four cylinder Mustang was offered back in 1973 and the first turbo four in 1984, so this is nothing new.  I agree I would rather have the V8 and so would 52 percent of Mustang buyers.  However, one out of four buyers choose the four cylinder engine and the Camaro will probably have a similar take rate.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Nomad on May 16, 2015, 08:01:04 PM
Ive had a Honda for years, and never no problems. Maybe its gone down hill recently, but my car is just fine.

Honda past 2008 is totally different.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr.1derful on May 16, 2015, 08:30:11 PM
ugly as fuck :'(

Agreed. 
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The_Punisher on May 17, 2015, 04:23:45 AM
Still too big/heavy.  Interior probably blows chunks too (as does the Mustang).

Love American cubic inch power but Camaro needs to go on diet, upscale the interior and ditch the Transformers era look.  Car is long in the tooth even though its V8 power train is impressive.

Americans CAN build great cars.....see C7, uprated Z06, CTS-V.  

Camaro needs more drastic change than this.  Turbo 4s are just gay in Mustang/Camaro.  They can be great in appropriate platforms....Mustang/Camaro are not best platform for turbo 4 IMO.


saw a white Z06 over the weekend and I have to say I was fucking impressed, Chevy really put time and effort into this...give them credit.....it's loud as thunder and that beast is fucking sexy.......I don't wanna compare it to no damn Porscha 911 GT3.......apple vs orange.....Nah
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: APE907 on May 17, 2015, 04:51:45 AM
I saw a white/tan z06 last week.   It really does stand out over standard z51.  Lots of car for the money.

Also saw new AMG GT-S few days ago.....bang a u turn just to see what the hell it was (spotted in parking lot out of corner of my eye).  The AMG looks pretty awesome IRL, especially from behind.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The_Punisher on May 17, 2015, 06:12:47 AM
I'm surprised the AMG GT is only in the 130k range......they said it's only getting better.....have not seen one in the street yet, only in a show room. the specs are impressive too....a little heavy, but that will do



MSRP: From $129,900
Horsepower: 503 HP
Engine: 4.0L V8
Fuel tank capacity: 17 gal
Curb weight: 3,627 lbs

Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 17, 2015, 06:15:13 AM
I'm surprised the AMG GT is only in the 130k range......they said it's only getting better.....have not seen one in the street yet, only in a show room. the specs are impressive too....a little heavy, but that will do



MSRP: From $129,900
Horsepower: 503 HP
Engine: 4.0L V8
Fuel tank capacity: 17 gal
Curb weight: 3,627 lbs


there will be a convertible, then a mild hp bump, and lastly a black series...
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: MAXX on May 17, 2015, 06:28:38 AM
design looks GTR inspired..
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: robcguns on May 17, 2015, 07:46:01 AM
looks a lot like a Mustang. But the Chevy logo cheapens the car. Would never buy a chevy because of it. I'm not a car guy at all, but fuck me it's a "walmart" type logo.

i agree completely
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The_Punisher on May 17, 2015, 08:09:31 AM
there will be a convertible, then a mild hp bump, and lastly a black series...



shit, I'd wanna see what their Black series will look like.......as long as they keep it from looking too much like a Gullwing......
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Tapeworm on May 17, 2015, 08:13:36 AM

Change is the story under the hood, however. A 2.0-liter turbo four from the ATS and CTS is the base engine now, producing 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft. of torque. GM says it's capable of 30 MPG on the highway

Gayer than a muscle car with a fuel economy conscience.  ::)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Schnauzer on May 17, 2015, 08:27:34 AM
Quote
the Chevy logo cheapens the car. Would never buy a Chevy because of it. I'm not a car guy at all, but fuck me it's a "Walmart" type logo.
  


The badge comes off

(http://images116.fotki.com/v716/photos/8/115068/8894784/Camarofronstbowtiedelete-vi.jpg)

(http://images54.fotki.com/v451/photos/8/115068/8894784/My2011rear-vi.jpg)



(http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/nnaboyq156/20140219_154411_zpscbc1795c.jpg)

(http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/nnaboyq156/20131018_153811_zpsa715417e.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 17, 2015, 08:29:36 AM

shit, I'd wanna see what their Black series will look like.......as long as they keep it from looking too much like a Gullwing......
they have a race car version coming out. And so does BMW with their M6.

Apparently AMG is using the old engine, not the twin turbo 4.0 V8.
(http://www.motorward.com/wp-content/images/2015/03/Mercedes-AMG-GT3-Geneva-0.jpg)
(http://www.autoguide.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/mercedes-amg-gt3/Mercedes-AMG-GT3-race-car-01.JPG)

M6 GT3 race car
(http://f30.bimmerpost.com/goodiesforyou/m/m6/gt3/mfestival/P90184055-highRes.jpg)
(http://f30.bimmerpost.com/goodiesforyou/m/m6/gt3/mfestival/P90184059-highRes.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Schnauzer on May 17, 2015, 08:33:05 AM
The 2015 GT3 RS is insane

(http://images.thecarconnection.com/lrg/2015-porsche-911-carrera_100502668_l.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The Scott on May 17, 2015, 09:35:42 AM


it's a Hit....I Dig.....the interior from previous models was as shitty as it gets....this new interior design gets an A.......let's see how this new Camaro will do in sales.....they've been beating Ponies in sales from the last couple of years

Yup.  I have an '11 Mustang because the interior is much  nicer than the Camaro.  I like the exterior of the Camaro a bit more but I sit inside the car.  Mine is the  V6 and I get up to 33 mpg on the highway.  Another reason I chose it over the V8. 

The new Camaro may convince me to trade in. Not really up as since my childhood I have always wanted either a Mustang, Camaro, Challenger or Corvette.  My only problem (other than affording a new car) is I have a great deal of difficulty getting in and out of these cars, especially the 'Vette.    First world problem, really.  ;D
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The Scott on May 17, 2015, 09:38:50 AM
It's in the shop getting a footprint gas pedal installed

Totally Hodaddy.  Not a gremmie move at all, dude!    Oh...I'm back from the 60s now... ;D
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Ronnie Rep on May 17, 2015, 10:17:03 AM
You can have the 2016, I'll take this one...

(https://cdn2.3dtuning.com/info/Chevrolet%20Camaro%20SS%201969%20Coupe/factory/3.jpg)
Oh yeah.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr. Zimbabwe on May 17, 2015, 10:30:24 AM

Carscoops
[snip]
Change is the story under the hood, however. A 2.0-liter turbo four from the ATS and CTS is the base engine now, producing 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft. of torque. GM says it's capable of 30 MPG on the highway, but with a 0-60 time of less than 6 seconds. It's substantially less powerful than the 2.3-liter turbo four Mustang Ecoboost, but that engine isn't the Ford's base powertrain.

But traditional muscle car fans will look to the 2016 Camaro SS and its 6.2-liter LT1 V8 out of the Corvette. Here it makes a stout 455 horsepower with either a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic – as the other two engines will be.

So the Chevy Turbo 4 is "substantially less powerful than the Turbo four Mustang Ecoboost"...and the Chevy "6.2-liter V8 makes a stout 455 horsepower" while the Mustang 5.0-liter V8 is giving 435hp (almost the same)....?   Well played by Ford!!
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: The_Punisher on May 17, 2015, 12:43:21 PM
they have a race car version coming out. And so does BMW with their M6.

Apparently AMG is using the old engine, not the twin turbo 4.0 V8.
(http://www.motorward.com/wp-content/images/2015/03/Mercedes-AMG-GT3-Geneva-0.jpg)
(http://www.autoguide.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/mercedes-amg-gt3/Mercedes-AMG-GT3-race-car-01.JPG)

M6 GT3 race car
(http://f30.bimmerpost.com/goodiesforyou/m/m6/gt3/mfestival/P90184055-highRes.jpg)
(http://f30.bimmerpost.com/goodiesforyou/m/m6/gt3/mfestival/P90184059-highRes.jpg)



Oh damn, I see a Great future for this car.....I'm sure it will be in the 24hr Le Mans soon. I don't see it in the lineUP for this year's Le mans
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Thespritz0 on May 17, 2015, 01:27:06 PM
AAAAHHHHH the love for 2-door cars by genuine GetBiggers...
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 17, 2015, 01:37:44 PM
AAAAHHHHH the love for 2-door cars by genuine GetBiggers...
I wonder if that comes with Corinthian Leather?
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: 2Thick on May 17, 2015, 01:41:26 PM
Not a fan of government motors. Partial to Japanese myself.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Thespritz0 on May 17, 2015, 01:45:05 PM
I wonder if that comes with Corinthian Leather?
^^
It says in the ad Glove-Soft bucket seats, so probably!!  Probably a powerful car too...
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 17, 2015, 01:52:27 PM
^^
It says in the ad Glove-Soft bucket seats, so probably!!  Probably a powerful car too...
same car
[/youtube]
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: APE907 on May 17, 2015, 04:52:55 PM
So the Chevy Turbo 4 is "substantially less powerful than the Turbo four Mustang Ecoboost"...and the Chevy "6.2-liter V8 makes a stout 455 horsepower" while the Mustang 5.0-liter V8 is giving 435hp (almost the same)....?   Well played by Ford!!

Plus the Ford playing 32v DOHC architecture card.  Overall a superior engine even though pushrod OHV on paper still can make crazy power.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 17, 2015, 04:55:58 PM
Plus the Ford playing 32v DOHC architecture card.  Overall a superior engine even though pushrod OHV on paper still can make crazy power.
Isnt the Coyote a heavier engine due to the DOHC design?
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: APE907 on May 17, 2015, 05:00:20 PM
Would have to google specs.  I like DOHC for higher revs.  Also love Chevy mouse and rat motors for their punch.  Two different great flavors of V8.  If I had to choose though, I like 32v better.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 17, 2015, 07:27:36 PM
Would have to google specs.  I like DOHC for higher revs.  Also love Chevy mouse and rat motors for their punch.  Two different great flavors of V8.  If I had to choose though, I like 32v better.

When it comes time to replace the engine, the superiority of the OHV engine will become apparent.  ;)

In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if many of those Mustangs had OHV engines installed in the future when the engine needs to be rebuilt.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 17, 2015, 07:45:13 PM
When it comes time to replace the engine, the superiority of the OHV engine will become apparent.  ;)

In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if many of those Mustangs had OHV engines installed in the future when the engine needs to be rebuilt.
I remember something about the first gen Coyotes having head issues or something, I forgot.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: tommywishbone on May 17, 2015, 10:25:10 PM
 :)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 17, 2015, 11:00:46 PM
:)

Looks so much better than that fugly BMW..
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Bevo on May 17, 2015, 11:39:16 PM
That BMW is ugly...

BMW needs to get its head out of its ass and start building cars that deserve to wear the "ultimate driving machine" slogan again
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mobil on May 18, 2015, 01:00:14 AM
i think the black on black rims on the new mustangs destroy the new comaro.. when i see one.. im like damn thats a nice car.. they sound different from the older mustangs too.. no hummmmmmmmmmm, just brrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaa
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Skeletor on May 18, 2015, 01:07:59 AM
Looks so much better than that fugly BMW..

Thankfully the Bangle era is over but BMW still has not fully recovered.
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 18, 2015, 06:39:50 AM
Thankfully the Bangle era is over but BMW still has not fully recovered.

It's like they hired a Japanese designer..
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 18, 2015, 06:57:24 AM
It's like they hired a Japanese designer..
BMW did, Joji Nagashima. And he designed possibly the best looking 5 series of all time, the e39 chassis.
(http://www.nm-motorsport.com/acatalog/BMWE39.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 18, 2015, 07:01:11 AM
BMW did, Joji Nagashima. And he designed possibly the best looking 5 series of all time, the e39 chassis.
(http://www.nm-motorsport.com/acatalog/BMWE39.jpg)

They really did? LOL!
I like the grill, but I've never been a true BMW fan, though I like their old 7 series

(http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/1/1278/121/3192560014_large.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr Anabolic on May 18, 2015, 07:06:32 AM
AAAAHHHHH the love for 2-door cars by genuine GetBiggers...

Yes.  My first car was a 2 door 1972 Impala.  Same color too, but mine was a hard top.  It literally floated down the street.

(http://www.classicchevrolets.com/images/72_impala_convt.jpg)
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Pork_Chop on May 18, 2015, 07:22:58 AM

I've always like Camaro's and in their last model they kind of made it flow and gave a nod back to it's heyday.

But that new version just looks like a blocky, generic thing. Too many edges and fussy details. It looks off from all angles.

Less is more it seems.

Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: JediTerminator on May 18, 2015, 07:49:45 AM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dMqF2ccL7c4/VVellLWul8I/AAAAAAAR7bw/lYOoPjmTCKw/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-15.jpg)

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PRMX2tJDpl0/VVelmMOvCII/AAAAAAAR7cM/ADI4yRFNZSU/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-19.jpg)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--c0AJk_4LS8/VVelhfXiJxI/AAAAAAAR7aQ/aoKWZMVjkVA/s1600/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-01.jpg)

Carscoops
[snip]
Change is the story under the hood, however. A 2.0-liter turbo four from the ATS and CTS is the base engine now, producing 270 horsepower and 295 lb.-ft. of torque. GM says it's capable of 30 MPG on the highway, but with a 0-60 time of less than 6 seconds. It's substantially less powerful than the 2.3-liter turbo four Mustang Ecoboost, but that engine isn't the Ford's base powertrain.

Camaro buyers who want more than a four, no matter how torquey, will be offered an upgrade to a new 3.6-liter V6 with 330 horsepower, up slightly over the outgoing 3.6 base engine. It's a new design that will also be available in the 2016 Cadillac CT6 sedan.

But traditional muscle car fans will look to the 2016 Camaro SS and its 6.2-liter LT1 V8 out of the Corvette. Here it makes a stout 455 horsepower with either a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic – as the other two engines will be. The Camaro SS gets modern tricks to go with its old-fashioned brawn, too, in the form of magnetic ride control. Selectable driving modes will make their way onto the Camaro line for the first time. And the company says the SS will be capable of better lap times than the old 1LE could manage. The SS manual also gets a new rev-match system to make those downshifts smoother.

http://www.carscoops.com/2015/05/the-2016-chevrolet-camaro-has-been.html (http://www.carscoops.com/2015/05/the-2016-chevrolet-camaro-has-been.html)



Design doesn't look much different than my buddy's 2010 Kia Forte. haha. bring back the muscle
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr. Zimbabwe on May 18, 2015, 03:07:01 PM
Design doesn't look much different than my buddy's 2010 Kia Forte.  haha.  bring back the muscle

Um....Yeahhh...
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Palumboism on May 18, 2015, 07:58:41 PM
Only on Getbig could people driving Corollas think this car looks bad.

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/503/8/S3485038/slug/l/053-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/503/7/S3485037/slug/l/052-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/503/5/S3485035/slug/l/050-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/507/4/S3485074/slug/l/024-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Bevo on May 18, 2015, 08:27:07 PM
Only on Getbig could people driving Corollas think this car looks bad.

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/503/8/S3485038/slug/l/053-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/503/7/S3485037/slug/l/052-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/503/5/S3485035/slug/l/050-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)

(http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/750x422/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/348/507/4/S3485074/slug/l/024-2016-chevy-camaro-1.jpg)



What's wrong with driving corollas? U don't need a pro physique to critique men in thongs
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Bevo on May 18, 2015, 08:30:31 PM
BMW did, Joji Nagashima. And he designed possibly the best looking 5 series of all time, the e39 chassis.
(http://www.nm-motorsport.com/acatalog/BMWE39.jpg)

Hahaha good one and the e39 is considered one of the best designed of all time BMW

Okuyama designed the Ferrari Enzo
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr. MB on May 18, 2015, 09:07:00 PM
I wonder if Henessy will do the 2016 too..



I have the Henessey kit on my 2010 SHO. Worth ever dollar!
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Mr. Zimbabwe on May 20, 2015, 07:25:20 AM
I have the Henessey kit on my 2010 SHO. Worth ever dollar!

Can you post pics....I'm sure the kit looks sweet!
Title: Re: 2016 Camaro
Post by: Parker on May 20, 2015, 07:35:54 AM
Um....Yeahhh...
Ummm, nooo  :D

(http://image.superchevy.com/f/70138249+w640+h640+q80+re0+cr1+st0/1967-chevrolet-camaro-rear-view-taillights.jpg)

(http://www.hotrods2die4.com/sold_cars/1969_Camaro_Copo_Clone/1969_Camaro_Copo_Cloner_rear_1.jpg)