Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Irongrip400 on July 21, 2015, 11:26:14 AM

Title: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 21, 2015, 11:26:14 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594658

Okay, maybe not, but does this leave a black cloud over a method with only a 70 year track record?  Wiggs, what say you?

BB related because protein farts are adding to the problem.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2015, 11:32:24 AM
Dude.......


There's a Tbombz  thread for this information. I tried to dispute carbon dating.

Ownings were administered.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Necrosis on July 21, 2015, 11:32:42 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594658

Okay, maybe not, but does this leave a black cloud over a method with only a 70 year track record?  Wiggs, what say you?

BB related because protein farts are adding to the problem.

it makes perfect sense doesn't it? there are other dating methods as well.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 21, 2015, 11:33:38 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594658

Okay, maybe not, but does this leave a black cloud over a method with only a 70 year track record?  Wiggs, what say you?

BB related because protein farts are adding to the problem.
carbon may not age under various temperature , atmospheric and chemical conditions very hard as cocks to tell
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 21, 2015, 11:34:43 AM
it makes perfect sense doesn't it? there are other dating methods as well.

Like Tinder?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Wiggs on July 21, 2015, 12:09:15 PM
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Wiggs on July 21, 2015, 12:17:15 PM
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: scottt on July 21, 2015, 12:17:55 PM
The skin color of Hebrews is meaningless with GOD.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 21, 2015, 12:21:51 PM
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.


I've looked at your old posts... couldn't find any where you destroyed anyone.. are you sure you're on the right forum?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Wiggs on July 21, 2015, 12:26:02 PM
I've looked at your old posts... couldn't find any where you destroyed anyone.. are you sure you're on the right forum?

Your name speaks volumes.  Go away. You're probably one I've destroyed.

And Scottt, I was speaking truth I'm regular argued with on this forum.  Those are three of them. Understand?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 12:26:47 PM
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

Conclusion:

Even if you prove that the earth is not 4.5 billion years old, it doesn't prove that the earth is 6,000 year old.

It only proves one thing: we don't have an answer and need to keep looking.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Wiggs on July 21, 2015, 12:27:21 PM
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

Conclusion:

Even if you prove that the earth is not 4.5 billion years old, it doesn't prove that the earth is 6,000 year old.

It only proves one thing: we don't have an answer and need to keep looking.


I said young earth. 
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 12:29:14 PM

I said young earth. 

How young?

Most people like yourself think the earth is 6,000 years old.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Necrosis on July 21, 2015, 12:38:27 PM


This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: loco on July 21, 2015, 12:43:42 PM
This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

Necrosis, don't ya knock Dr. Kent Hovind.  He graduated from Patriot University.

Patriot University
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/PatriotU_Crop.jpg)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#Education
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Coffeed on July 21, 2015, 12:47:02 PM
Don't be confused by the pic! Tons of schools have many offshoot campuses even small ones are run by very prestigious universities.

This is simply a photo of their main campus.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 12:50:12 PM
This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

According to Wiggs and MOS, he was falsely imprisoned. They said he was being persecuted for his beliefs.  ::) ::)

I bet if it was a Muslim who was falsely imprisoned, they wouldn't say it was because of his beliefs.  ::) ::)
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2015, 12:53:31 PM
This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

Yet Al Sharpton still runs the streets and White House.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2015, 12:58:34 PM
According to Wiggs and MOS, he was falsely imprisoned. They said he was being persecuted for his beliefs.  ::) ::)

I bet if it was a Muslim who was falsely imprisoned, they wouldn't say it was because of his beliefs.  ::) ::)

Yet Al Sharpton still runs the streets and White House.

Lol, I love how everyone  acts like they're going to convince everyone  else why it makes sense why they're so entrenched in their beliefs. 
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 01:01:17 PM
Lol, I love how everyone  acts like they're going to convince everyone  else why it makes sense why they're so entrenched in their beliefs. 

I never said I am going to convince anyone here. It is quite apparent this is getbig, and most of the stuff here is just said for "shit stirring."

MOS is the only one who actually (sort of) believes that he may be able to help getbiggers find Christ.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Royalty on July 21, 2015, 01:01:30 PM
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

Conclusion:

Even if you prove that the earth is not 4.5 billion years old, it doesn't prove that the earth is 6,000 year old.

It only proves one thing: we don't have an answer and need to keep looking.

I agree with this
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: loco on July 21, 2015, 01:05:39 PM
Don't be confused by the pic! Tons of schools have many offshoot campuses even small ones are run by very prestigious universities.

This is simply a photo of their main campus.

LOL     ;D
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: funk51 on July 21, 2015, 01:06:26 PM
Necrosis, don't ya knock Dr. Kent Hovind.  He graduated from Patriot University.

Patriot University
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/PatriotU_Crop.jpg)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#Education
that's right next to the weider research center... ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2015, 01:06:40 PM
I never said I am going to convince anyone here. It is quite apparent this is getbig, and most of the stuff here is just said for "shit stirring."

MOS is the only one who actually (sort of) believes that he may be able to help getbiggers find Christ.

Fair enough.

I wasn't complaining BTW

It's still funny.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Marty Champions on July 21, 2015, 01:11:33 PM
I have to set the record straight
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: disco_stu on July 21, 2015, 01:32:12 PM
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.


yeah, first he created life, then people, then decided to give little timmy bone cancer- just for a laugh.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: The_Punisher on July 21, 2015, 01:34:08 PM
So... what really Destroyed the Dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 01:43:35 PM
I have to set the record straight

Yes, we all know, you're bat-shit crazy.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Howard on July 21, 2015, 01:49:15 PM
So... what really Destroyed the Dinosaurs?

The Lord saw the ass rape of the TBombzsaurass by the evil penisaurus rex.
Despite claiming it felt like a deep tissue massage , except a penis was in your ass, the Lord was mad.
So, the Lord farted loudly and blew all the dinosaurs off the face the earth.

Book of TBombz

Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on July 21, 2015, 01:50:35 PM
The whole scientific story is bullshit.

We are to believe that for hundreds of millions of years the earth existed.  Then mankind has records up to a few thousand years ago.  Lived like nomads for millennia then all of a sudden the last 100 years we exponentially grew in things like technologies and sciences.  What the fuck was mankind doing for thousands of years if we have so many inventions all at once?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Howard on July 21, 2015, 01:55:16 PM
The whole scientific story is bullshit.

We are to believe that for hundreds of millions of years the earth existed.  Then mankind has records up to a few thousand years ago.  Lived like nomads for millennia then all of a sudden the last 100 years we exponentially grew in things like technologies and sciences.  What the fuck was mankind doing for thousands of years if we have so many inventions all at once?

Yeah buddy.
Science is for fags.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: The_Punisher on July 21, 2015, 01:56:50 PM
The Lord saw the ass rape of the TBombzsaurass by the evil penisaurus rex.
Despite claiming it felt like a deep tissue massage , except a penis was in your ass, the Lord was mad.
So, the Lord farted loudly and blew all the dinosaurs off the face the earth.

Book of TBombz





Cleared... ;D
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 21, 2015, 02:03:59 PM
How old are dinosaurs then? Were their bones just sprinkled about after the earth's creation?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Automation on July 21, 2015, 02:05:50 PM
Not this shit again......
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Howard on July 21, 2015, 02:06:05 PM


Cleared... ;D

Another popular theory states that most of the male dinosaurs starting to admire the biggest males.
A skeleton was recently found of a Schmosaurus , with his front right paw fossilized next to his crotch region.
The biggest stopped mating with the females and the Goodrumasaurus flourished for a bit. Then, the race of dinosaurs died out.


Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Howard on July 21, 2015, 02:08:32 PM
How old are dinosaurs then? Were their bones just sprinkled about after the earth's creation?

Ok but how do you explain the remains of the Penisaurus Rex's  giant fossilized member?

Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Necrosis on July 21, 2015, 02:16:42 PM
The whole scientific story is bullshit.

We are to believe that for hundreds of millions of years the earth existed.  Then mankind has records up to a few thousand years ago.  Lived like nomads for millennia then all of a sudden the last 100 years we exponentially grew in things like technologies and sciences.  What the fuck was mankind doing for thousands of years if we have so many inventions all at once?

You need to read some history
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: PJim on July 21, 2015, 02:19:36 PM
The whole scientific story is bullshit.

We are to believe that for hundreds of millions of years the earth existed.  Then mankind has records up to a few thousand years ago.  Lived like nomads for millennia then all of a sudden the last 100 years we exponentially grew in things like technologies and sciences.  What the fuck was mankind doing for thousands of years if we have so many inventions all at once?

Things don't have to make sense to you whatsoever. It ain't why, it just is.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Howard on July 21, 2015, 02:22:13 PM
You need to read some history

True, but 1st they need to learn how to read. :o
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Teutonic Knight on July 21, 2015, 03:03:31 PM
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.


Just name BLACK AFROS equivalent of C14  technology  ;D

U are embarrassment for other Afro Americans  ::)

Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: mazrim on July 21, 2015, 03:37:46 PM
This was/is pretty common knowledge for those who cared to take a look at carbon dating.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SquidVicious on July 21, 2015, 03:58:51 PM
lets play along and pretend the earth is 6000 years old and God created Adam and Eve and they were both black. Can someone show me an African bloodline that produced white offspring from black parents. How about asians? When the white slave traders went to Africa to buy slaves, where were all of the white and Asian offspring slaves? Don't we all know a black couple who gave birth to a couple of Chinese kids? Happens every day in the wonderful world of Wiggs.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 21, 2015, 04:18:14 PM
lets play along and pretend the earth is 6000 years old and God created Adam and Eve and they were both black. Can someone show me an African bloodline that produced white offspring from black parents. How about asians? When the white slave traders went to Africa to buy slaves, where were all of the white and Asian offspring slaves? Don't we all know a black couple who gave birth to a couple of Chinese kids? Happens every day in the wonderful world of Wiggs.

 :D
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 21, 2015, 05:53:32 PM
They just found a copy of some pages from the Koran that they carbon dated to the time of Mohammed. Moslems in Birmingham rejoice. I wonder if this article will squash their enthusiasm. ???
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Lustral on July 21, 2015, 07:19:32 PM
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.


Read the article...
Quote
Growing emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are threatening the effectiveness of radiocarbon dating, according to new research.

That is, old data cannot be interpreted the same as new data as carbon emissions have changed. Im pretty sure the carbon emissions when Shakespeare lived weren't too different to when Charlemagne lived.... I know neither is referenced in the bible but try doing some research and learning for the first time. It might make you less of a retard.

Your so fucking stupid it defies description.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Man of Steel on July 21, 2015, 08:00:21 PM
I never said I am going to convince anyone here. It is quite apparent this is getbig, and most of the stuff here is just said for "shit stirring."

MOS is the only one who actually (sort of) believes that he may be able to help getbiggers find Christ.

I just plant seeds.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 08:05:53 PM
I just plant seeds.

Again, planting seeds is hoping that some people may be inspired by your words.

That's pretty much the same thing as what I said.

Semantics.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Palumboism on July 21, 2015, 08:12:33 PM
Radio Carbon dating is only useful for things less than 50,000 years old.   The earth's age, of 4.5 Billion years, was determined using Radiometric dating of the lead isotope isochron.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: el numero uno on July 21, 2015, 08:16:48 PM
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.



Whoa, easy there buddie, this is too much info for Wiggs to handle.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Teutonic Knight on July 21, 2015, 09:02:57 PM
So... what really Destroyed the Dinosaurs?

Lost tribe of Isreal kill them all  ;D
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on July 21, 2015, 09:12:30 PM
Necrosis, don't ya knock Dr. Kent Hovind.  He graduated from Patriot University.

Patriot University
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/PatriotU_Crop.jpg)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#Education

This is like the quack doctor Wiggs was quoting about his distilled water only theory.

Christ some people are stupid
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: syntaxmachine on July 21, 2015, 09:25:10 PM
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

It could, if, e.g., (~X-->Y) (If not X then Y). But clearly that formula doesn't hold in this case (i.e., it isn't the case that if carbon dating is flawed, then the world is roughly 6,000 years old).
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: SF1900 on July 21, 2015, 09:31:35 PM
It could, if, e.g., (~X-->Y) (If not X then Y). But clearly that formula doesn't hold in this case (i.e., it isn't the case that if carbon dating is flawed, then the world is roughly 6,000 years old).

Thank you for the clarification, Syntax.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: _bruce_ on July 22, 2015, 04:56:39 AM
The are artifacts in Southern America that hint at humans/civilization having existed for a very long time. Unfortunately a good bunch of scientists have been "expelled" from the community to not shit all over the picture presented to us. It's like everything else - you're part of "the" club as long as you play along.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 22, 2015, 05:14:25 AM
Radio Carbon dating is only useful for things less than 50,000 years old.   The earth's age, of 4.5 Billion years, was determined using Radiometric dating of the lead isotope isochron.

Woah buddy, keep your big words and your science to yourself, we are trying to have intelligent conversations here.



The are artifacts in Southern America that hint at humans/civilization having existed for a very long time. Unfortunately a good bunch of scientists have been "expelled" from the community to not shit all over the picture presented to us. It's like everything else - you're part of "the" club as long as you play along.

There was a program on Nat Geo about the Americas before Columbus which showed that there were massive cities in South America, which have now been covered by the rainforests.  They said the indigenous people used to log and clear those forests, but when they were all killed off by smallpox etc., that the rainforests came back and over grew all of the old cities. So, when people say that we need to save these forests, I think that is false, as some of them are only a few hundred years old.  Not all need to be logged, but it would be great to excavate some of these ruins.

The Mormons believe this in their doctrine.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: BigCyp on July 22, 2015, 05:19:05 AM
Woah buddy, keep your big words and your science to yourself, we are trying to have intelligent conversations here.



There was a program on Nat Geo about the Americas before Columbus which showed that there were massive cities in South America, which have now been covered by the rainforests.  They said the indigenous people used to log and clear those forests, but when they were all killed off by smallpox etc., that the rainforests came back and over grew all of the old cities. So, when people say that we need to save these forests, I think that is false, as some of them are only a few hundred years old.  Not all need to be logged, but it would be great to excavate some of these ruins.

The Mormons believe this in their doctrine.

They also wear secret underwear, and go to a planet called Kolob when they die lol.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 22, 2015, 05:36:13 AM


While I get what you're saying (never heard any Mormons I know mention kobob though), don't all religions have all of these unbelievable/far fetched stories?  I try not to make fun of one over the other, except for Islam as it seems to draw in crazies and promote violence.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Necrosis on July 22, 2015, 06:08:20 AM
It could, if, e.g., (~X-->Y) (If not X then Y). But clearly that formula doesn't hold in this case (i.e., it isn't the case that if carbon dating is flawed, then the world is roughly 6,000 years old).

If it's a binary system.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: BigCyp on July 22, 2015, 07:02:55 AM
While I get what you're saying (never heard any Mormons I know mention kobob though), don't all religions have all of these unbelievable/far fetched stories?  I try not to make fun of one over the other, except for Islam as it seems to draw in crazies and promote violence.

True. It is a little fresh of me calling Mormons crazy for keeping their underpants off the radar, when it is common knowledge that I believe a man lived in the belly of a fish for 3 days.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: The Grim Lifter on July 22, 2015, 07:29:59 AM
The whole scientific story is bullshit.

We are to believe that for hundreds of millions of years the earth existed.  Then mankind has records up to a few thousand years ago.  Lived like nomads for millennia then all of a sudden the last 100 years we exponentially grew in things like technologies and sciences.  What the fuck was mankind doing for thousands of years if we have so many inventions all at once?

I'm sorry this is what i thought of when i read your post

(http://i.imgur.com/o7V81aM.jpg)

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/717/428/c6e.jpg)
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: PJim on July 22, 2015, 10:05:41 AM
I'm sorry this is what i thought of when i read your post

(http://i.imgur.com/o7V81aM.jpg)

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/717/428/c6e.jpg)

I deal with the public daily and I am constantly baffled by the stupidity of 90 percent of people.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: _bruce_ on July 22, 2015, 10:12:35 AM
Woah buddy, keep your big words and your science to yourself, we are trying to have intelligent conversations here.



There was a program on Nat Geo about the Americas before Columbus which showed that there were massive cities in South America, which have now been covered by the rainforests.  They said the indigenous people used to log and clear those forests, but when they were all killed off by smallpox etc., that the rainforests came back and over grew all of the old cities. So, when people say that we need to save these forests, I think that is false, as some of them are only a few hundred years old.  Not all need to be logged, but it would be great to excavate some of these ruins.

The Mormons believe this in their doctrine.

Hard to say for sure - would love to see for myself and have a little lab in such a region. Nat/Geo and offspring can be pretty creative at times.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on July 22, 2015, 10:18:59 AM
Does this mean the Universe really is a Hologram and isn't real?
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Irongrip400 on July 22, 2015, 11:21:05 AM
True. It is a little fresh of me calling Mormons crazy for keeping their underpants off the radar, when it is common knowledge that I believe a man lived in the belly of a fish for 3 days.

Whales are mammals bro, as evidenced by many fat women.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on July 22, 2015, 11:27:09 AM
Whales are mammals bro, as evidenced by many fat women.

The jury is still out on this.
Title: Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
Post by: Man of Steel on July 22, 2015, 11:30:48 AM
Again, planting seeds is hoping that some people may be inspired by your words.

That's pretty much the same thing as what I said.

Semantics.

It is the same thing.