Author Topic: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.  (Read 9188 times)

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21324
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594658

Okay, maybe not, but does this leave a black cloud over a method with only a 70 year track record?  Wiggs, what say you?

BB related because protein farts are adding to the problem.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16162
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2015, 11:32:24 AM »
Dude.......


There's a Tbombz  thread for this information. I tried to dispute carbon dating.

Ownings were administered.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2015, 11:32:42 AM »
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594658

Okay, maybe not, but does this leave a black cloud over a method with only a 70 year track record?  Wiggs, what say you?

BB related because protein farts are adding to the problem.

it makes perfect sense doesn't it? there are other dating methods as well.

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36464
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2015, 11:33:38 AM »
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594658

Okay, maybe not, but does this leave a black cloud over a method with only a 70 year track record?  Wiggs, what say you?

BB related because protein farts are adding to the problem.
carbon may not age under various temperature , atmospheric and chemical conditions very hard as cocks to tell
A

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21324
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2015, 11:34:43 AM »
it makes perfect sense doesn't it? there are other dating methods as well.

Like Tinder?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40910
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2015, 12:09:15 PM »
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.
7

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40910
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2015, 12:17:15 PM »
7

scottt

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 325
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2015, 12:17:55 PM »
The skin color of Hebrews is meaningless with GOD.

Agnostic007

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15046
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2015, 12:21:51 PM »
Look at my past posts.  I've destroyed True Adonis and other atheists on this many times in the past.  I've said the earth is a young earth and that carbon dating is a fraud.  Kent Hovind destroys well known and regarded atheists often as he is a former high school biology teacher. This proves once again, the Bible being correct and it also begs for a ton of questions.


BTW, if the earth is young that means God created it.  There would be no other way because there wouldn't be enough time via "evolution".



The earth is young, God is real and the Hebrews are black.  Deal with it people. Repent, pray and study your Bible.


I've looked at your old posts... couldn't find any where you destroyed anyone.. are you sure you're on the right forum?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40910
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2015, 12:26:02 PM »
I've looked at your old posts... couldn't find any where you destroyed anyone.. are you sure you're on the right forum?

Your name speaks volumes.  Go away. You're probably one I've destroyed.

And Scottt, I was speaking truth I'm regular argued with on this forum.  Those are three of them. Understand?
7

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2015, 12:26:47 PM »
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

Conclusion:

Even if you prove that the earth is not 4.5 billion years old, it doesn't prove that the earth is 6,000 year old.

It only proves one thing: we don't have an answer and need to keep looking.
X

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40910
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2015, 12:27:21 PM »
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

Conclusion:

Even if you prove that the earth is not 4.5 billion years old, it doesn't prove that the earth is 6,000 year old.

It only proves one thing: we don't have an answer and need to keep looking.


I said young earth. 
7

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2015, 12:29:14 PM »

I said young earth. 

How young?

Most people like yourself think the earth is 6,000 years old.
X

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2015, 12:38:27 PM »


This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19189
  • loco like a fox
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2015, 12:43:42 PM »
This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

Necrosis, don't ya knock Dr. Kent Hovind.  He graduated from Patriot University.

Patriot University


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#Education

Coffeed

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2938
  • Athletes representative for Grifted Nutrition.
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2015, 12:47:02 PM »
Don't be confused by the pic! Tons of schools have many offshoot campuses even small ones are run by very prestigious universities.

This is simply a photo of their main campus.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2015, 12:50:12 PM »
This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

According to Wiggs and MOS, he was falsely imprisoned. They said he was being persecuted for his beliefs.  ::) ::)

I bet if it was a Muslim who was falsely imprisoned, they wouldn't say it was because of his beliefs.  ::) ::)
X

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 60018
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2015, 12:53:31 PM »
This guy went to jail for tax evasion and fraud. Is this the best you people have?

Yet Al Sharpton still runs the streets and White House.

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16162
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2015, 12:58:34 PM »
According to Wiggs and MOS, he was falsely imprisoned. They said he was being persecuted for his beliefs.  ::) ::)

I bet if it was a Muslim who was falsely imprisoned, they wouldn't say it was because of his beliefs.  ::) ::)

Yet Al Sharpton still runs the streets and White House.

Lol, I love how everyone  acts like they're going to convince everyone  else why it makes sense why they're so entrenched in their beliefs. 

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48855
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2015, 01:01:17 PM »
Lol, I love how everyone  acts like they're going to convince everyone  else why it makes sense why they're so entrenched in their beliefs. 

I never said I am going to convince anyone here. It is quite apparent this is getbig, and most of the stuff here is just said for "shit stirring."

MOS is the only one who actually (sort of) believes that he may be able to help getbiggers find Christ.
X

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30721
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2015, 01:01:30 PM »
Let me explain how logic works.

Proving X wrong doesn't mean Y is right.

Conclusion:

Even if you prove that the earth is not 4.5 billion years old, it doesn't prove that the earth is 6,000 year old.

It only proves one thing: we don't have an answer and need to keep looking.

I agree with this

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19189
  • loco like a fox
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #21 on: July 21, 2015, 01:05:39 PM »
Don't be confused by the pic! Tons of schools have many offshoot campuses even small ones are run by very prestigious universities.

This is simply a photo of their main campus.

LOL     ;D

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40425
  • Getbig!
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #22 on: July 21, 2015, 01:06:26 PM »
Necrosis, don't ya knock Dr. Kent Hovind.  He graduated from Patriot University.

Patriot University


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#Education
that's right next to the weider research center... ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
F

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16162
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #23 on: July 21, 2015, 01:06:40 PM »
I never said I am going to convince anyone here. It is quite apparent this is getbig, and most of the stuff here is just said for "shit stirring."

MOS is the only one who actually (sort of) believes that he may be able to help getbiggers find Christ.

Fair enough.

I wasn't complaining BTW

It's still funny.

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36464
Re: Carbon dating wrong, the world is most likely 6,000 years old.
« Reply #24 on: July 21, 2015, 01:11:33 PM »
I have to set the record straight
A