Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Skip8282 on August 04, 2015, 04:42:09 PM
-
She's sitting back letting the Repub clownfest run around in circles.
But - that's letting them set the agenda on issues, get tons of attention (albeit not always the most flattering), and possibly energizing their base.
-
Biden could beat her, but doesn't seem like he even wants to run.
her strategy is smart enough... just show up, do no harm, and look better than trump.
if she runs against trump, ONE OF THEM wins 40 states, period.
-
Doesn't matter. If she wins it will ONLY be because she's women. Accomplishments include "Being the First Lady" - 240
-
Doesn't matter. If she wins it will ONLY be because she's women. Accomplishments include "Being the First Lady" - 240
how come repubs aren't smart enough to choose carly fiorina, since women always vote for a woman?
but but but
-
how come repubs aren't smart enough to choose carly fiorina, since women always vote for a woman?
but but but
Your question is an answer in itself and that's too bad.
-
Your question is an answer in itself and that's too bad.
Yeah, he answered the question when he stated "repubs aren't smart enough".
Party of stupid.
-
Doesn't matter. If she wins it will ONLY be because she's women. Accomplishments include "Being the First Lady" - 240
Really? How many?
-
how come repubs aren't smart enough to choose carly fiorina, since women always vote for a woman?
but but but
Liberal women vote for liberal women. stop trolling.
-
Liberal women vote for liberal women. stop trolling.
liberals vote for liberals.
When repubs women DO turn out, the repubs win BIG. 1980, 1984, 1988, 2000, 2004, and 2010 - those were the ONLY years in modern times that repub won the FEMALE vote - notice a trend? There was an actual CONSERVATIVE running each time (2010 being the palin tea party avalanche).
repubs like trump DO NOT win the women vote.
Women hate trump:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/31/politics/donald-trump-voter-numbers/
Trump is a fucking liberal. period. you cannot deny it - your only defense is "but but but he STOPPED being a lib, he said so"
haha brutal defense.
-
Really? How many?
x2
-
Doesn't matter. If she wins it will ONLY be because she's women. Accomplishments include "Being the First Lady" - 240
Yes and Obama only won because he is Black.
It has NOTHING to do with the republicans and their retarded voters = You.
-
Yes and Obama only won because he is Black.
It has NOTHING to do with the republicans and their retarded voters = You.
BINGO!!! And you see whats happening. Forget that, like Lurker, 240, andre and straw you think everything is going great. Dude, destroyed his own district (a fucking DISTRICT) within a city...what did you think was going to happen when he ran country? I knew. I just didn't think it would be this bad.
-
BINGO!!! And you see whats happening. Forget that, like Lurker, 240, andre and straw you think everything is going great. Dude, destroyed his own district (a fucking DISTRICT) within a city...what did you think was going to happen when he ran country? I knew. I just didn't think it would be this bad.
excuses. Why didn't Hermann Cain win?
All these excuses (he only won cause of color, she will only win cause of gender) instantly disappear when we mention repubs could run condi rice (a black woman) and win, right?
OH - then it becomes "only libs do it", at which point coach realizes "only libs are voting for the liberal candidate". Um, that's what voters are supposed to do, right? just cause the GOP can't motivate their base, we have to revert to excuses about race.
-
excuses. Why didn't Hermann Cain win?
Because he was forced out by bullshit accusations, like they do with everyone else. Funny how all that disappeared the day after he dropped out.
All these excuses (he only won cause of color, she will only win cause of gender) instantly disappear when we mention repubs could run condi rice (a black woman) and win, right?
Doesn't make a difference. She's a smart, intelligent, extremely well educated, well spoken black women...and the left hate that. But you can bet if she became a Dem she would be the first or second choice.
OH - then it becomes "only libs do it", at which point coach realizes "only libs are voting for the liberal candidate". Um, that's what voters are supposed to do, right? just cause the GOP can't motivate their base, we have to revert to excuses about race.
Because demonizing works which is why Trump is kicking the shit out of everyone. The left can't run on anything else. This is why they prey on uneducated, uninformed inner-city voters and young liberal-educated (what most universities are) students and graduates that have been conditioned to buy into such bullshit.
-
She's sitting back letting the Repub clownfest run around in circles.
But - that's letting them set the agenda on issues, get tons of attention (albeit not always the most flattering), and possibly energizing their base.
She is doing what Democrat candidates are allowed to do: say very little and speak primarily in a highly controlled environment.
The only clownfest on the GOP side is Trump. But he has a shelf life.
She's definitely not out of the woods on her email scandal.
-
The only clownfest on the GOP side is Trump. But he has a shelf life.
what's his shelf life? Didn't you predict trump wouldn't do well in the polls, without spending lots of $?
everyone predicting the GOP base will suddenly wise up... WHEN?
-
BINGO!!! And you see whats happening. Forget that, like Lurker, 240, andre and straw you think everything is going great. Dude, destroyed his own district (a fucking DISTRICT) within a city...what did you think was going to happen when he ran country? I knew. I just didn't think it would be this bad.
Seeing how the country is in much better shape now than it was before Obama took office, your definition of "bad" must be fueled by nothing more than simplistic delusions.
-
what's his shelf life? Didn't you predict trump wouldn't do well in the polls, without spending lots of $?
everyone predicting the GOP base will suddenly wise up... WHEN?
No you lying liar. Tell the truth. It will set you free.
Trump is a clown. He's going nowhere. Liberals like you are all over him because you like to see bad things happen to the Republican party, and at end of the day, Trump is not good for the Republican party.
-
She is doing what Democrat candidates are allowed to do: say very little and speak primarily in a highly controlled environment.
The only clownfest on the GOP side is Trump. But he has a shelf life.
She's definitely not out of the woods on her email scandal.
WRONGO (as usual).......look at Bernie Sanders..he's doing the EXACT opposite....
however, Hillary does look controlled and is not saying much..which is why she's giving Biden and SANDERS an opening....she did the same in 2008 and look how that turned out
-
No you lying liar. Tell the truth. It will set you free.
Trump is a clown. He's going nowhere. Liberals like you are all over him because you like to see bad things happen to the Republican party, and at end of the day, Trump is not good for the Republican party.
You seem to be more Republican than Trump is
-
WRONGO (as usual).......look at Bernie Sanders..he's doing the EXACT opposite....
however, Hillary does look controlled and is not saying much..which is why she's giving Biden an opening....she did the same in 2008 and look how that turned out
Bernie Sanders doesn't help your position. He has done pretty well given his opponent and overall lack of appeal regarding his candidacy.
-
You seem to be more Republican than Trump is
I'm an independent. Trump is neither a Republican nor a Democrat IMO. He's an entertainer and businessman and darn good at both.
-
Trump is a clown. He's going nowhere.
Trump is a billionaire + commanding lead + huge set of TV skills + able to blur his political positions and make people feel good about it at the same time (Reagan evolved, and so have I...)
Please define "nowhere". How will he place in iowa? NH? Where will he finish in the delegate count? What date will he
I agree trump is a freakin' joke, I agree he's neither dem nor repub - I think he's this cheerleading salesman able to make people feel good about fighting the power. We probably agree about plenty when it comes to trump.
But I want to know when/how it comes unraveled for trump. He shit on vets and went up another ten points in polls. unreal, i know, but the GOp voting base is so in love with his celebrity, they are willing to look past his shady political positions and classless idiocy.
-
No you lying liar. Tell the truth. It will set you free.
Trump is a clown. He's going nowhere. Liberals like you are all over him because you like to see bad things happen to the Republican party, and at end of the day, Trump is not good for the Republican party.
Which is the CT of Trump being on DNC payroll is not that far fetching.
-
Trump is a billionaire + commanding lead + huge set of TV skills + able to blur his political positions and make people feel good about it at the same time (Reagan evolved, and so have I...)
Please define "nowhere". How will he place in iowa? NH? Where will he finish in the delegate count? What date will he
I agree trump is a freakin' joke, I agree he's neither dem nor repub - I think he's this cheerleading salesman able to make people feel good about fighting the power. We probably agree about plenty when it comes to trump.
But I want to know when/how it comes unraveled for trump. He shit on vets and went up another ten points in polls. unreal, i know, but the GOp voting base is so in love with his celebrity, they are willing to look past his shady political positions and classless idiocy.
You haven't evolved into anything but an even bigger liberal than the first time I started posting on this board.
I have no idea what date Trump will drop out. What I do know is he is not going to be the nominee. He is not going to be president.
-
Bernie Sanders doesn't help your position. He has done pretty well given his opponent and overall lack of appeal regarding his candidacy.
BUT...hes's doing exactly what you claim Democratic candidates don't do..thats the point we're discussing..also when Obama ran he was very open about everything he wanted to do.....which he has since accomplished...
-
Which is the CT of Trump being on DNC payroll is not that far fetching.
I don't discount certain candidates being pushed by opposing parties, but I don't see that here. It's just a prime opportunity for Trump to increase his brand and he's all over it, just like the great businessman that he is.
In the past, it wouldn't shock me if that dude from North or South Carolina several years ago was some kind of plant. Forget his name, but he was pretty funny. I think he was some kind of convicted felon, no education, etc. Someone posted about it on the board.
-
I'm an independent. Trump is neither a Republican nor a Democrat IMO. He's an entertainer and businessman and darn good at both.
The man has been in front of a TV camera for over 30 years. That's his thing.
He will look the most comfortable by far tonight standing front and center on stage.
-
Which is the CT of Trump being on DNC payroll is not that far fetching.
maybe trump was pre-paid for his services.
Or, maybe he gets a new primetime show after this election, who knows.
COnsider this - Trump disclosed his Apprentice earnings: $213,606,575
That's right. 213 MILLION for 12 years of that show, nearly 20 million a year to host a show where he appears for all of 7 minutes an episode and the ratings sure sagged at times. Were they overpaying him so he'd fck up the repub chances down the road? who knows lol, it's a belief that many have.
-
Add this to Killarys strategy...lol
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/hillary-clinton-put-southern-accent-south-carolina-democratic-chairman_1005486.html
-
BUT...hes's doing exactly what you claim Democratic candidates don't do..thats the point we're discussing..also when Obama ran he was very open about everything he wanted to do.....which he has since accomplished...
I don't use Trump as a barometer for anything. He's not going to win the nomination. He's no more viable than Ron Paul was. Neither of them was ever going to win the nomination.
-
In the past, it wouldn't shock me if that dude from North or South Carolina several years ago was some kind of plant. Forget his name, but he was pretty funny. I think he was some kind of convicted felon, no education, etc. Someone posted about it on the board.
i think alvin greene or something? complete plant, and it worked too, right? get in there, split up the vote, make it ugly.
everyone here saying msnbc is promoting the guy - listen to nbc - they trash him 24/7. Maddow's entire show is "why trump is terrrible". Rush is seriously on his testes, refusing to criticize him? SOme serious water-carrying there!!!
-
Trump is a billionaire + commanding lead + huge set of TV skills + able to blur his political positions and make people feel good about it at the same time (Reagan evolved, and so have I...)
Please define "nowhere". How will he place in iowa? NH? Where will he finish in the delegate count? What date will he
I agree trump is a freakin' joke, I agree he's neither dem nor repub - I think he's this cheerleading salesman able to make people feel good about fighting the power. We probably agree about plenty when it comes to trump.
But I want to know when/how it comes unraveled for trump. He shit on vets and went up another ten points in polls. unreal, i know, but the GOp voting base is so in love with his celebrity, they are willing to look past his shady political positions and classless idiocy.
I'll admit you are probably the most entertaining guy on here since Chris left but your arguments lose a lot of weight when u twist and turn everything into these far out conspiracy theories.
-
The man has been in front of a TV camera for over 30 years. That's his thing.
He will look the most comfortable by far tonight standing front and center on stage.
He'll look comfortable when he gets to make speeches, which is essentially all this format will allow him to do. We'll see just how much he knows when the field is smaller and he actually has to have serious policy discussions and not just yell at people (assuming he's still around at that point).
-
I have no idea what date Trump will drop out.
do you have an estimate? It seems odd you KNOW it to be a fact, but can't even surmise when. He has access to more money than the other candidates, probably combined lol. And it's all TV from here on out, debates... trump dominates the board room - do you think he's really going to get "put in his place" by the likes of rand paul? lol
-
I don't use Trump as a barometer for anything. He's not going to win the nomination. He's no more viable than Ron Paul was. Neither of them was ever going to win the nomination.
I never understood people's attraction to Ron Paul...he wanted to take the country back to 1776....but if Trump exits this first debate unscathed and jumps up more in the polls then you simply can no longer say he can't be taken seriously
Also never underestimate the idiocy of the republican voter....many of them actually believed Obama was not an American citizen, was muslim, and a secret terrorist bent on destroying the nation
:D
-
He'll look comfortable when he gets to make speeches, which is essentially all this format will allow him to do. We'll see just how much he knows when the field is smaller and he actually has to have serious policy discussions and not just yell at people (assuming he's still around at that point).
trump has a very good memory. and he's been studying, speaking more and more policy. The 'flip flopping lib" is the biggest charge against him, and him using the reagan defense is brilliant for that. Coach is ready to give trump a massage for pete's sake lol, everyone jumping on board.
Except you, and I give you respect for that. These idiots are drooling over a tv star, an immature loudmouth that will embarass our country and probably lose 40 states to hilary.
-
i think alvin greene or something? complete plant, and it worked too, right? get in there, split up the vote, make it ugly.
everyone here saying msnbc is promoting the guy - listen to nbc - they trash him 24/7. Maddow's entire show is "why trump is terrrible". Rush is seriously on his testes, refusing to criticize him? SOme serious water-carrying there!!!
Yes I think that was the guy. Thanks.
-
do you have an estimate? It seems odd you KNOW it to be a fact, but can't even surmise when. He has access to more money than the other candidates, probably combined lol. And it's all TV from here on out, debates... trump dominates the board room - do you think he's really going to get "put in his place" by the likes of rand paul? lol
No I don't have an estimate. Why is that so important to you?
-
I never understood people's attraction to Ron Paul...he wanted to take the country back to 1776....but if Trump exits this first debate unscathed and jumps up more in the polls then you simply can no longer say he can't be taken seriously
Also never underestimate the idiocy of the republican voter....many of them actually believed Obama was not an American citizen, was muslim, and a secret terrorist bent on destroying the nation
:D
I don't care how he does in this debate. He's not going to win the nomination.
I don't know how many Republican voters actually thought Obama was born in Kenya, but there are dummies in both parties.
-
Doesn't matter. If she wins it will ONLY be because she's women. Accomplishments include "Being the First Lady" - 240
Really, Joe. She was also Secretary of State and a US Senator.... ::)
-
Really, Joe. She was also Secretary of State and a US Senator.... ::)
these credentials are worthless.
however the 2 or 3 *years* that rubio or rand bring to the table in the senate are WAY more impressive than hilary's, right?
same argument every time. "Palin's 5 community colleges for a BA in journalism is way more impressive than Harvard Law".... mmm, okay lol.
-
Seeing how the country is in much better shape now than it was before Obama took office, your definition of "bad" must be fueled by nothing more than simplistic delusions.
Sure it is. The 94mil people not looking for jobs says so. And just to add this was just 5 days ago..
Revisions: The latest GDP numbers show that President Obama's economic recovery — already the worst since World War II — was even worse than previously thought. This isn't slow and steady growth, it's punishingly slow.
News accounts of the latest Bureau of Economic Analysis report pointed to the 2.3% growth in real GDP in the second quarter as evidence that the economy had "bounced back" and "continued the slow but steady recovery trajectory of the last six years."
To be sure, 2.3% growth isn't awful, and it does come after the BEA revised its Q1 estimate upward — from -0.2 % to +0.6%. But the real story isn't found in these latest quarterly numbers. It's elsewhere in the report.
As it periodically does, the BEA revised previous years' GDP numbers, and what it found this time is that growth in almost every quarter since 2012 was weaker than it previously calculated.
The result is that GDP growth from 2012 to 2014 was just 2%, not 2.3%. In dollar terms, the revisions cut more than $100 billion from the nation's economic pie.
It also means that President Obama has presided over an economic recovery — now more than six years old — that is far worse than all the previous 10 stretching back 70 years.
Even President Bush's recovery from the 2001 recession — widely derided by Democrats and the press for being far too tepid — was stronger that Obama's. After 24 quarters, Obama's GDP is up a mere 13.3%. By this point in the Bush recovery, GDP had grown 18%.
Looked at another way, if Obama's recovery had been merely average — that is, if it had kept pace with the average of the previous 10 — the nation's economy would be $2.07 trillion bigger.
That works out to more than $17,000 in lost wealth per household thanks to Obama's subpar growth.
When confronted with such dismal results, the Obama administration and its defenders will blame the recession, claiming that recoveries from fiscal crises are always slower. Leave aside the fact that multiple studies have debunked this claim — as the charts below show — Obama's recovery has vastly underperformed even his own projections.
Obama's fiscal 2010 budget, for example, pegged 2010 growth at 3.2%. Actual growth was 2.5%. Even now, Obama keeps overestimating the growth his policies are supposed to be producing. While slow and steady might win some races, when it comes to the economy, it means leaving millions of the most vulnerable Americans falling behind.
Average income among the wealthiest 5% of households has climbed since 2009, but it's dropped for those in the bottom 20%, Census data reveal.
The average length of unemployment is now 28 weeks — a month longer than when the economic recovery officially began way back in June 2009.
Millions have given up looking for work and dropped out of the labor force entirely. And millions more are in poverty and on food stamps than at the start of Obama's recovery.
How many of these people would say they're pleased with the "steady" snail's pace growth under this president? In our view, this is an intolerable economic situation, and one that would be widely viewed as such if someone other than Obama occupied the White House.
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/073015-764333-tepid-gdp-growth-leaves-economy-even-further-behind-the-pace.htm
-
Sure it is. The 94mil people not looking for jobs says so. And just to add this was just 5 days ago..
Yes you support Trump - who has said the 11 million illegals who soak up millions of jobs, can STAY in teh use thru this 'merit' amnesty he is proposing.
Make up your mind - which is it? Trump's amnesty plan (let them stay) is the obama amnesty plan, and you know it. Same plan, same economic results. Ted Cruz will kick their asses out - opening up millions of jobs for americans.
-
Really, Joe. She was also Secretary of State and a US Senator.... ::)
And failed. 4 Americans dead, one dude in jail for alleging making a video that supposedly started the whole thing only to find out he was just a scape goat.
-
Trump is a billionaire + commanding lead + huge set of TV skills + able to blur his political positions and make people feel good about it at the same time (Reagan evolved, and so have I...)
Please define "nowhere". How will he place in iowa? NH? Where will he finish in the delegate count? What date will he
I agree trump is a freakin' joke, I agree he's neither dem nor repub - I think he's this cheerleading salesman able to make people feel good about fighting the power. We probably agree about plenty when it comes to trump.
But I want to know when/how it comes unraveled for trump. He shit on vets and went up another ten points in polls. unreal, i know, but the GOp voting base is so in love with his celebrity, they are willing to look past his shady political positions and classless idiocy.
I don't think he'll make it either, but I can't predict when he'll fall out. And, I could be dead wrong and he goes all the way.
But Hillary playing it low key seems unwise. Not all of the attention on Repubs is negative and they're getting a lot of airtime right now.
-
I don't think he'll make it either, but I can't predict when he'll fall out. And, I could be dead wrong and he goes all the way.
But Hillary playing it low key seems unwise. Not all of the attention on Repubs is negative and they're getting a lot of airtime right now.
I agree...I really don't understand her strategy
-
I avoid the politics board most of the time, but Joe, you realize how many people died when Bush was in office? In Embassies that were attacked?
A lot more than 4.
Where was the outrage then?
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/138727-viral-meme-13-benghazis-happened-bush-taken-apart-destroyed-eyes/
-
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/138727-viral-meme-13-benghazis-happened-bush-taken-apart-destroyed-eyes/
Still waiting to hear how many women Hillary is.
-
Still waiting to hear how many women Hillary is.
You might as well just stand there with a blank look on your face with drool dribbling from your mouth. That would be about the same rebut.
-
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/138727-viral-meme-13-benghazis-happened-bush-taken-apart-destroyed-eyes/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_U.S._diplomatic_facilities
Reagan had 17 people... That's your golden President on the right.
Anytime an attack happens it is dumb fucking luck if someone does or doesn't die.
But Hillary is the devil because it happened under her.
Hillary sucks ass, but it's not because of Benghazi.
Let's see any of your Republican nominees even mention it. They won't of course because it had zero impact on Obama in 2012.
-
You might as well just stand there with a blank look on your face with drool dribbling from your mouth. That would be about the same rebut.
That's the general effect your stupidity has on people.
Hillary is a "women". ::)
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_U.S._diplomatic_facilities
Reagan had 17 people... That's your golden President on the right.
Anytime an attack happens it is dumb fucking luck if someone does or doesn't die.
But Hillary is the devil because it happened under her.
Hillary sucks ass, but it's not because of Benghazi.
Let's see any of your Republican nominees even mention it. They won't of course because it had zero impact on Obama in 2012.
good post...embassies are attacked all the time......diplomats and oither personnel die all eh time from therse atacks..the embassies of other countries are attacked as well.....but you NEVER se other countries blame their president or secretary of state for the attaks..it only happens here....The politicians of the United States argue over the most simplistic things ...which is why we can't get any work done any more
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_U.S._diplomatic_facilities
Reagan had 17 people... That's your golden President on the right.
Anytime an attack happens it is dumb fucking luck if someone does or doesn't die.
But Hillary is the devil because it happened under her.
Hillary sucks ass, but it's not because of Benghazi.
Let's see any of your Republican nominees even mention it. They won't of course because it had zero impact on Obama in 2012.
But the birther sheeple have to have SOMETHING to whine about the next 8 years..... don't take this from them.
-
good post...embassies are attacked all the time......diplomats and oither personnel die all eh time from therse atacks..the embassies of other countries are attacked as well.....but you NEVER se other countries blame their president or secretary of state for the attaks..it only happens here....The politicians of the United States argue over the most simplistic things ...which is why we can't get any work done any more
Yeah they get attacked...but when the fucking idiot in charge is repeatedly warned to do something and does nothing, thats the issue. Then they come out with some stupid story about a youtube movie to cover their asses..then there's repeated stories about stand down orders and who could provide support to whom. It was anothe Obama/Hil mess that they created themselves.
-
Yeah they get attacked...but when the fucking idiot in charge is repeatedly warned to do something and does nothing, thats the issue. Then they come out with some stupid story about a youtube movie to cover their asses..then there's repeated stories about stand down orders and who could provide support to whom. It was anothe Obama/Hil mess that they created themselves.
You said it yourself "Stories", and not one verified with any proof what so ever.
Ever story comes straight from the group of people who just HATE the people in charge. Not one real independent source what so ever.
-
i want benghazi hearings.
BUT the way they're doing them - "let's wait until Fall 2016 to have public hearings" - is trashy political abuse of their deaths. It's like if Bush had said "911 is tragic" then decided to wait until 2 weeks before his re-election to invade, in order to look strong and get the nation behind him.
obama should probably be impeached for the 'do nothing' action - but it should happen now, not whenever senate repubs want to damage some dems. Fuck both sides here, they're all pricks.
-
Yeah they get attacked...but when the fucking idiot in charge is repeatedly warned to do something and does nothing, thats the issue. Then they come out with some stupid story about a youtube movie to cover their asses..then there's repeated stories about stand down orders and who could provide support to whom. It was anothe Obama/Hil mess that they created themselves.
You mean like the idiot in charge who was warned ahead of time that terrorists were planning to fly planes into buildings?
-
You said it yourself "Stories", and not one verified with any proof what so ever.
Ever story comes straight from the group of people who just HATE the people in charge. Not one real independent source what so ever.
HAHAHA. You certainly came back with a strong pimp hand.
-
You mean like the idiot in charge who was warned ahead of time that terrorists were planning to fly planes into buildings?
:D
-
Yeah they get attacked...but when the fucking idiot in charge is repeatedly warned to do something and does nothing, thats the issue. Then they come out with some stupid story about a youtube movie to cover their asses..then there's repeated stories about stand down orders and who could provide support to whom. It was anothe Obama/Hil mess that they created themselves.
again the problem is why is it that some people like you feel the need to blame the president for EVERYTHING that happens in your life???..in no other country does this happen....the prsident, especially Obama has become the idealized father figure who absolutely must know everything and must be blamed for all that goes wrong
SHIT HAPPENS....live with it
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_U.S._diplomatic_facilities
Reagan had 17 people... That's your golden President on the right.
Anytime an attack happens it is dumb fucking luck if someone does or doesn't die.
But Hillary is the devil because it happened under her.
Hillary sucks ass, but it's not because of Benghazi.
Let's see any of your Republican nominees even mention it. They won't of course because it had zero impact on Obama in 2012.
Pretty sure Reagan didn't use a scape goat and blame it on a video. It started there.
-
good post...embassies are attacked all the time......diplomats and oither personnel die all eh time from therse atacks..the embassies of other countries are attacked as well.....but you NEVER se other countries blame their president or secretary of state for the attaks..it only happens here....The politicians of the United States argue over the most simplistic things ...which is why we can't get any work done any more
Idiots...again. Blamed it on a video with an innocent man in jail, destroyed emails, "what difference does it make now"?
-
Really, Joe. She was also Secretary of State and a US Senator.... ::)
And she excelled at both jobs.
No wait . . . .
-
Idiots...again. Blamed it on a video with an innocent man in jail, destroyed emails, "what difference does it make now"?
Where is the proof of this?
I mean, this is a huge conspiracy... Not quite the vein of 9-11 size, but large.
If this is true, there must be some proof right?
I don't blame Bush for 9-11, why would I blame Obama or Clinton for something that another group of people did?
It's like blaming Roosevelt for Pearl Harbor... Or blaming Saddam for 9-11... or...
You see my point I'm sure.
-
Where is the proof of this?
I mean, this is a huge conspiracy... Not quite the vein of 9-11 size, but large.
If this is true, there must be some proof right?
I don't blame Bush for 9-11, why would I blame Obama or Clinton for something that another group of people did?
It's like blaming Roosevelt for Pearl Harbor... Or blaming Saddam for 9-11... or...
You see my point I'm sure.
Exactly...and thats the problem as I said in an earlier post...we blame the president for everything....and this has become worse since Obama has been in office
-
Where is the proof of this?
I mean, this is a huge conspiracy... Not quite the vein of 9-11 size, but large.
If this is true, there must be some proof right?
I don't blame Bush for 9-11, why would I blame Obama or Clinton for something that another group of people did?
It's like blaming Roosevelt for Pearl Harbor... Or blaming Saddam for 9-11... or...
You see my point I'm sure.
Then why is she giving Goudy the run around? for four years? How about the testimonials from the ones that were actually there that totally contradicts just about everything she said?
-
Feel free to refute..
http://conservativetribune.com/proof-hillary-committed-treason/
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-clinton-scared-trey-gowdy-benghazi/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10/politics/trey-gowdy-hillary-clinton/
We can start here.
-
Feel free to refute..
http://conservativetribune.com/proof-hillary-committed-treason/
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-clinton-scared-trey-gowdy-benghazi/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10/politics/trey-gowdy-hillary-clinton/
We can start here.
Wouldn't matter where anyone started. You already have your feeble little mind made up and there is nothing that is going to penetrate that force field of delusions.
-
Feel free to refute..
http://conservativetribune.com/proof-hillary-committed-treason/
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-clinton-scared-trey-gowdy-benghazi/
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/10/politics/trey-gowdy-hillary-clinton/
We can start here.
Well, since you mention Trey Gowdy (with one believable source), I will simply ask you, if he's so sure she received a subpoena, then he should be able to reproduce it.
You know subpoenas are usually made with about 6 copies and only one given to the person receiving it.
Where's the subpoena? Certainly it must exist.
If you get one, or I get one, there are 5 other copies that the courts receive.
Where are they? Certainly the courts wouldn't hide this... I mean, again, you're talking huge cover up.
-
Pretty sure Reagan didn't use a scape goat and blame it on a video. It started there.
reagan just kept saying "I don't remember".
-
Pretty sure Reagan didn't use a scape goat and blame it on a video. It started there.
what reagan did with the iran-contra scandal is pretty much what obama did with benghazi.
only difference is, the dems of the 1980s had the balls to actually investigate that shit.
The repubs of the obama era are too scared of him to go at him.