Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: BDsauce on August 10, 2015, 05:15:49 AM

Title: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: BDsauce on August 10, 2015, 05:15:49 AM
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: falco on August 10, 2015, 06:33:32 AM
Wise words on that fella.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: 240 is Back on August 10, 2015, 06:39:37 AM
lee had some of the best arms of all time.

If he's 5 foot 10, he has five Sandow trophies right now.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Donny on August 10, 2015, 06:44:44 AM
Gotta Love Lee Priest and he is always quick with his comments.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Jizmo on August 10, 2015, 06:58:23 AM
lee had some of the best arms of all time.

If he's 5 foot 10, he has five Sandow trophies right now.

wouldve sold em on ebay too i guess
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Kwon_2 on August 10, 2015, 06:58:49 AM
3:10 LOL! The only one seeing phil heath in 20 years will be his parole-officer! BOOM



Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Donny on August 10, 2015, 06:59:34 AM
wouldve sold em on ebay too i guess
you would buy his thong if you could ;D
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: oldschoolfan on August 10, 2015, 07:09:19 AM
everything lee said is true

no one gives two fucks about phil,  i wonder how well his  "gifted anal nutrition" supplement line is doing


phil is just a piece of shit pure and simple  easily most unpopular mr olympia ever
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Disgusted on August 10, 2015, 09:41:39 AM
Arnold had some extremely good separation in the frontal quad area which more that made up for their size.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Donny on August 10, 2015, 09:45:51 AM
Arnold had some extremely good separation in the frontal quad area which more that made up for their size.
not a big Arnold fan but he was intelligent enough to realize his limitations on back squats , thus utilizing Front Squats.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Royalty on August 10, 2015, 09:49:09 AM
I will never understand why Phil decided to criticize Arnold after Arnold said that today's pro's should look more like Cederic & Dexter.... and not have the big belly.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: spiro on August 10, 2015, 10:08:24 AM
Phil Heath is so boring absolutely zero charisma. Arnold would shit all over that chocolate manlet in every aspect  of life. You hear that Phil you insulin blow up doll.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: oldschoolfan on August 10, 2015, 10:09:07 AM
thats how dumb and arrogant phil is

arnold is untouchable he is someone that you cant criticize


i would guarantee  if arnold was in his prime and walked into the gym, he would train phil into the ground arnold just had  that drive and mantality

shit arnold was worth more money in 1975 than phil is now
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: oldschoolfan on August 10, 2015, 10:10:02 AM
Phil Heath is so boring absolutely zero charisma. Arnold would shit all over that chocolate manlet in every aspect  of life. You hear that Phil you insulin blow up doll.


you got that right , phil couldnt even get through arnolds pre contest routine he would die maybe half way through


casey viator even told me arnolds pre contest routine  was brutal and would kill most people
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: SquatsRule on August 10, 2015, 10:18:06 AM
I, like a lot of people, learned about bodybuilding from Arnold's book. I tried his superset routine for a couple of weeks. Chest/back supersets and legs all in one workout since I could only make one trip to the gym a day. It sucked.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Donny on August 10, 2015, 10:25:05 AM
I, like a lot of people, learned about bodybuilding from Arnold's book. I tried his superset routine for a couple of weeks. Chest/back supersets and legs all in one workout since I could only make one trip to the gym a day. It sucked.
well what did you learn from this? your Body is Individual.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Carlton G. Long on August 10, 2015, 10:31:12 AM
Lee craps on everyone. 
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Disco187 on August 10, 2015, 11:13:04 AM
Arnold had some extremely good separation in the frontal quad area which more that made up for their size.

totally agree.  I think for Arnolds height and the availability to certain drugs, he did a pretty dam good job.  I would love to see Arnold compete today with the availability of gear and info that is out there, as to what Lee said.
  Best part about Phill Heath is his brachialradialus
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Pet shop boys on August 10, 2015, 11:17:14 AM
I rather have the quality muscle that lee has here than philsulin


[/youtube]



WoooSSHHHHHHH   TA NA KA
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Disco187 on August 10, 2015, 11:51:21 AM
that gym is the shit
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: bradistani on August 10, 2015, 12:07:03 PM
Phil Heath is so boring absolutely zero charisma. Arnold would shit all over that chocolate manlet in every aspect  of life. You hear that Phil you insulin blow up doll.

he'll have to step up his shoe game first...
(http://i61.tinypic.com/atn6lw.jpg)

BEAST MODE
(http://i.imgur.com/L00QOHU.gif)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=395363.0;attach=429357;image)
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on August 10, 2015, 12:07:43 PM
Best Lee Priest video right here. 100% spot on.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: SquatsRule on August 10, 2015, 12:34:18 PM
well what did you learn from this? your Body is Individual.
I learned I wasn't suites for Arnold's workouts.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Dr Dutch on August 10, 2015, 02:06:31 PM
Lee Priest deserved the Sandow way more than that narrow-shouldered nobody Heath...
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Teutonic Knight on August 10, 2015, 02:07:31 PM
lee had some of the best arms of all time.

If he's 5 foot 10, he has five Sandow trophies right now.


Old people don't grow on HGH  ;D
Putin too was trying & trying but  :-\
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: DroppingPlates on August 10, 2015, 02:28:05 PM
Pot calling the kettle black... Lee is full of strong opinions, and now he calls Phil's opinion 'disrespectful'?  ::)
Phil is free to express that opinion, and he's right on Arnold's legs, so what's the big deal?
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: SF1900 on August 10, 2015, 02:41:52 PM
Pot calling the kettle black... Lee is full of strong opinions, and now he calls Phil's opinion 'disrespectful'?  ::)
Phil is free to express that opinion, and he's right on Arnold's legs, so what's the big deal?

Its about the context. If Phil was having a discussion with someone and was critiquing bodybuilders from the 70's, then it would have been fine.

But Phil said it to get back at Arnold for saying that many of the bodybuilders today have guts. It was immature and vindictive and was not well played.

For me, its all about the context behind the statement.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Hulkotron on August 10, 2015, 02:46:08 PM
BEAST MODE
(http://i.imgur.com/L00QOHU.gif)

Some serious hater-reps
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Papper on August 10, 2015, 02:49:37 PM
I rather have the quality muscle that lee has here than philsulin


[/youtube]



WoooSSHHHHHHH   TA NA KA

That kind of hardness is rarely seen today, if ever. And certainly not from Phil.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Hulkotron on August 10, 2015, 02:52:13 PM
Nasser was 300 lbs with abs.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: DroppingPlates on August 10, 2015, 02:54:50 PM
Its about the context. If Phil was having a discussion with someone and was critiquing bodybuilders from the 70's, then it would have been fine.

But Phil said it to get back at Arnold for saying that many of the bodybuilders today have guts. It was immature and vindictive and was not well played.

For me, its all about the context behind the statement.

It was a bit childish, I agree with that, but you see this happen all the time; bodybuilding is a visual thing, so calling someone out for heaving weak spots is an easy (and childish) thing.
Arnold is free to have his opinion about today's bodybuilding, but on the other hand he's giving the current pro generation a stage. If he wants that classic look, than why isn't there a classic BB class (=weight to height limit) on the AC, like we have in Europe?
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: SF1900 on August 10, 2015, 03:00:50 PM
It was a bit childish, I agree with that, but you see this happen all the time; bodybuilding is a visual thing, so calling someone out for heaving weak spots is an easy (and childish) thing.
Arnold is free to have his opinion about today's bodybuilding, but on the other hand he's giving the current pro generation a stage. If he wants that classic look, than why isn't there a classic BB class (=weight to height limit) on the AC, like we have in Europe?

I can't answer all of that. All I know is that Arnold was giving an honest critique about todays bodybuilders, and Phil shot back at him like a 4 year old.

And to say Arnold had NO legs is just stupid

(http://www.evolutionofbodybuilding.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/arnold-legs.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: oldschoolfan on August 10, 2015, 03:03:09 PM
That kind of hardness is rarely seen today, if ever. And certainly not from Phil.


priest is alot stronger , trains harder and has way better form than that clown phil as well.


Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: DroppingPlates on August 10, 2015, 03:04:51 PM
And to say Arnold had NO legs is just stupid

True, Phil was exaggerating about that.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: SF1900 on August 10, 2015, 03:22:18 PM

priest is alot stronger , trains harder and has way better form than that clown phil as well.




In that video, Priest looked to be pre-contest and was doing 3 plates on incline. Reps were slow and controlled, and he was not breathing heavy.

Phil is doing 4 plates on a hammer strength press and is huffing and puffing like he just ran 5 miles.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: TheShape. on August 10, 2015, 03:27:58 PM
That kind of hardness is rarely seen today, if ever. And certainly not from Phil.
Homo post reported
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: SF1900 on August 10, 2015, 03:37:23 PM
True, Phil was exaggerating about that.


Arnold didnt have "Tom Platz type legs" but clearly they were nicely built and had good size.

Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: DroppingPlates on August 10, 2015, 03:37:29 PM
Homo post reported

Hear, hear..
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Teutonic Knight on August 10, 2015, 03:58:09 PM

priest is alot stronger , trains harder and has way better form than that clown phil as well.




& owns totally coin worthless Nabba title , so .................
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: oldschoolfan on August 10, 2015, 04:24:47 PM
In that video, Priest looked to be pre-contest and was doing 3 plates on incline. Reps were slow and controlled, and he was not breathing heavy.

Phil is doing 4 plates on a hammer strength press and is huffing and puffing like he just ran 5 miles.

yeah you got that right , phil is lucky he didnt compete in the 90's if he did he would up have doing gay porn.

well he probably does that on the side now
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Parker on August 10, 2015, 06:55:48 PM
If Arnold were competing now, I don't think he would be Mr. I. I think he be a 300+ pound guy with a wide waist. Freaky yes, but aesthetically he would look like Gunter.

Arnold looked best at his lighter weight, when start to add weight, one's flaws start to become more apparent. Like Flex, he didn't have a wide back or lat spread, so when he got bigger the added weight accentuated that flaw.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2015, 07:08:48 PM
If Arnold were competing now, I don't think he would be Mr. I. I think he be a 300+ pound guy with a wide waist. Freaky yes, but aesthetically he would look like Gunter.

Arnold looked best at his lighter weight, when start to add weight, one's flaws start to become more apparent. Like Flex, he didn't have a wide back or lat spread, so when he got bigger the added weight accentuated that flaw.

Quote
If Arnold were competing now, I don't think he would be Mr. I. I think he be a 300+ pound guy with a wide waist. Freaky yes, but aesthetically he would look like Gunter.

Not necessarily he may have went the Shawn Ray route and decided to forego ( although Shawn may have been on GH )  GH & Insulin because he didn't want to ruin his aesthetic appeal

Quote
Arnold looked best at his lighter weight, when start to add weight, one's flaws start to become more apparent. Like Flex, he didn't have a wide back or lat spread, so when he got bigger the added weight accentuated that flaw.

He didn't have a wide back?  ??? compared to who? guys now who outweigh him my 40lbs? Show me another guy 6'2" and 235lbs with a back this wide , it can't be done. his chest measurement was 57" for Christ's sake
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Parker on August 10, 2015, 07:13:15 PM
Not necessarily he may have went the Shawn Ray route and decided to forego ( although Shawn may have been on GH )  GH & Insulin because he didn't want to ruin his aesthetic appeal

He didn't have a wide back?  ??? compared to who? guys now who outweigh him my 40lbs? Show me another guy 6'2" and 235lbs with a back this wide , it can't be done. his chest measurement was 57" for Christ's sake
No, Flex didn't have a wide back. I meant "like Flex" as using Flex as an example

No, I think Arnold is the type to do whatever it takes to win, and he is 6'1-6'2, so that means he would have plenty of room to fill out, unlike Shawn Ray. Gunter was over 300 pounds and was about the same height as Arnold.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: jude2 on August 10, 2015, 07:14:09 PM
I rather have the quality muscle that lee has here than philsulin


[/youtube]



WoooSSHHHHHHH   TA NA KA
Damn he looks some good in that video.
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: mr.turbo on August 10, 2015, 07:16:10 PM
Pot calling the kettle black... Lee is full of strong opinions, and now he calls Phil's opinion 'disrespectful'?  ::)
Phil is free to express that opinion, and he's right on Arnold's legs, so what's the big deal?

your opinion on Arnold's legs is stupid
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: DroppingPlates on August 11, 2015, 03:21:40 AM
your opinion on Arnold's legs is stupid

Your problem
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Bevo on August 11, 2015, 03:28:54 AM
Lee Priest deserved the Sandow way more than that narrow-shouldered nobody Heath...

Lee is even more narrow
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: Bevo on August 11, 2015, 03:33:20 AM
lee had some of the best arms of all time.

If he's 5 foot 10, he has five Sandow trophies right now.

He still wouldn't have beaten Shawn, Chris, flex, levrone, Ronnie, Nasser.....
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: G_Thang on August 11, 2015, 07:42:34 AM
(http://musclemecca.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=5520)

(http://static.theglobeandmail.ca/8f2/globe-drive/culture/commuting/article14430980.ece/ALTERNATES/w620/mycar19wh3.JPG)

(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3511231&d=1309968071)

(http://beastmotivation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/phil-heath.gif)

(http://storytimewithjohn.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/phil-heath-gif.gif)
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: mr.turbo on August 11, 2015, 09:37:16 AM
Your problem

incomprehensible reply to an indefensible "position"
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: DroppingPlates on August 11, 2015, 11:21:20 AM
incomprehensible reply to an indefensible "position"

Couldn't care less :)
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: mr.turbo on August 11, 2015, 11:24:32 AM
Couldn't care less :)

you will pay for this
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: FitnessFrenzy on August 11, 2015, 11:27:35 AM
I will never forget when Lee Priest posted an ironmeister photoshop on his instagram account. That was beyond epic!
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on August 12, 2015, 06:15:27 PM
(http://fakeposters.com.s3.amazonaws.com/results/2015/08/13/4vf03rola4.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest comments on Phil Heath
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on August 12, 2015, 06:20:52 PM
(http://fakeposters.com.s3.amazonaws.com/results/2015/08/13/gh1zhxyu1x.jpg)