If they dress like sluts I view them more as slutsThe argument is that it's their body, so that they can dress how they want. And be free of judgment or shame. Yet wear XYZ to function to call attention to themselves. And when they ar judged...hands go up.
It does not have the opposite effect, which shouldn't be too hard to grasp even for a dumb slut
The argument is that it's their body, so that they can dress how they want. And be free of judgment or shame. Yet wear XYZ to function to call attention to themselves. And when they ar judged...hands go up.
Now, Amber has said that she was first slut shamed at 14. I believe she started stripping around 15 or so (IIRC). Now, this may have something to do with how she grew up.
Odd, how we all want to do what we want, and be free of judgment (be that any act, man or woman), yet we don't want the consequences of our actions, unless the consequences are positive feedback (Phil Heath as an example).
They are detached from the real world, not realising that Utopia cannot exist. Yes, you will be treated differently based on how you look. Is that right? Yes, frankly. Does it make you deserve rape? No. But people will be people, and given the chance SOME will not follow the law. Getting raped for dressing provocatively is wrong, but knowingly putting yourself in a situation where it is more likely to happen does put some of the responsibility on the victim. I could walk around the ghetto waving my cash and flashing my Rolex and SHOULD remain unmolested, but I take responsibility for my own actions, and so do not recklessly endanger myself by that sort of behaviour. You cannot work off of theories on how people SHOULD behave, you base your actions on how people DO behave.
(http://thefappening.so/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Amber-Rose-Naked-000.jpg)I'd put a wig on it and pump away for a few minutes. With prior written and notarised consent of course.
Shes just a classic attention whore
Hoes are gonna get hoe treatment and of course some idiot will try to wife them because they are willing to follow them everywhere. These women bring nothing to table except pretty faces, great bodies, and banging sex.
Then the men get tired of them and are mad when they lose money on the deal
Amber Rose is an idiot. Being a hoe is not something you want to promote. Old hoes in their 60's and 70's are a sad bunch. Women need to work on developing themselves all around. Besides that women who actually are sexually liberated don't care what others think and do whatever they want. They aren't hoes. Hoes have nothing else going on except being sex objects
Undermining your entire argument in one sentence... ;D
They can't have their cake and eat it too. They only want to be noticed by whoever they find attractive and want to talk too, yet when you dress like this, you are open to judgement of everyone within viewing range. If you wear shot like that, prepare to take the good with the bad. That said, anyone who rapes a woman because of how she's dressed should be liquidated.
They can't have their cake and eat it too. They only want to be noticed by whoever they find attractive and want to talk too, yet when you dress like this, you are open to judgement of everyone within viewing range. If you wear shot like that, prepare to take the good with the bad. That said, anyone who rapes a woman because of how she's dressed should be liquidated.
At the risk of sounding professorial, I think we men have got to accept two things:
That this is a patriarchal society and that men created rules whereby we could do whatever we wanted and women could not. Women have the right to have sex with as many guys as they can handle......we men put social rules in place to control women and to control their bodies and sexuality........women are starting to kick our asses in the workplace and in academia and they no longer want to be bound by these rules.....
second of all, women have ALWAYS been promiscuous....its just that they are so much better than us at hiding it.....just watch the Maury show :D..we men are pretty much open about what we do 8)
WOW. incredible how you get so much wrong in a few short sentences. First, society has always been set up to protect women especially from themselves... There has never been a time when men did whatever they wanted and women could not. Only the Elite ( and that included women) could do whatever they wanted . The average man was nothing but a worker drone. The vast majority didnt have a say in how society was run..couldnt vote except they had land etc...
Women are not kicking mens asses in anything.NOTHING. The schools have been redesigned to favor women and turn the boys into pseudo females. Boys are not designed to sit down for hours on end and listen to some woman babble about some topic, Even the way testing is done has been redesigned to favor women precisely because men are just better and harder working. Yes they graduate at a higher rate but with a bunch of shitty degrees and go to do nothing jobs in HR departments and business offices while the men continue to innovate, build and maintain society like we've always done.
Now once you get out into the real world...hell even higher education where those constraints are removed and boys can return to being boys, They destroy the women.. In the subjects and fields that matter ( STEM), not fucking social work and gender studies. If women are kicking mens asses why are the ratios of nobel prize winners in the mathematics and sciences so skewed towards men that women are pretty much invisible?
You've been drinking the kool-aid... they got to you. You need to purge brother. Get that shit out of your system.
you're right about one thing though. Women have always been whores but society (men ) kept them in check because a whorish female is a no good piece of trash and is worthless to the progress of society and civilization. Remove those checks and look what happens... Take a look at the matriarchal community in America which is the African American community. Just a sad state of affairs. Breeding criminal males in record numbers, Fatherless homes, single mothers, poverty etc ... thats what happens when you give women unrestricted freedom. Same shit that would happen if you gave a kid no restrictions. A fucking Disaster.
Look at the feminist controlled European countries and what is happening right now... I could go on and on and on.
Rant over.
On topic Amber Rose is a fine ass hoe. I'd hit it once or twice with no hesitation. :)
In terms of intellect, men are generally more extreme or polarized then woman. This is a fact, look at the bell curve. there are far more avg intelligence woman then men, however, in terms of genius, men outnumber woman significantly, this is why sciences are skewed. We evolved differently, makes sense.
They are detached from the real world, not realising that Utopia cannot exist. Yes, you will be treated differently based on how you look. Is that right? Yes, frankly. Does it make you deserve rape? No. But people will be people, and given the chance SOME will not follow the law. Getting raped for dressing provocatively is wrong, but knowingly putting yourself in a situation where it is more likely to happen does put some of the responsibility on the victim. I could walk around the ghetto waving my cash and flashing my Rolex and SHOULD remain unmolested, but I take responsibility for my own actions, and so do not recklessly endanger myself by that sort of behaviour. You cannot work off of theories on how people SHOULD behave, you base your actions on how people DO behave.
Seriously, I think it's the wrong way to go about itExactly. Many of these women (and people who profess victimhood) want to be Victor and victim all in the same time. You want to be protected and use the system against men, yet you want equality to men. Well, that means that the "protection" ends. Or men get the same "protection". This is somewhat of a backdoor acknowledgment of wanting equality only when you want it. Equality is unconditional.
As soon as you stop viewing yourself as a victim you care less about people judging you. This is just portraying women as a victim group - again
« Reply #5 on: Today at 07:47:21 AM »
Reply with quoteQuote
They are detached from the real world, not realising that Utopia cannot exist. Yes, you will be treated differently based on how you look. Is that right? Yes, frankly. Does it make you deserve rape? No. But people will be people, and given the chance SOME will not follow the law. Getting raped for dressing provocatively is wrong, but knowingly putting yourself in a situation where it is more likely to happen does put some of the responsibility on the victim. I could walk around the ghetto waving my cash and flashing my Rolex and SHOULD remain unmolested, but I take responsibility for my own actions, and so do not recklessly endanger myself by that sort of behaviour. You cannot work off of theories on how people SHOULD behave, you base your actions on how people DO behave.
If women want to go protest shit they don't like about men, then at least have the balls to go to a country like one of these islamic ones and give them shit.
It's easy to treat N. American and European men like shit and blame us for all the ills and victimizations of women because our society and media is emasculating males through shaming(how fucking ironic) yet if they went to one of these 3rd world Islamic shitholes or even rich ones like Saudi Arabia they would find out very quickly how much they are not as victimized and unfairly treated as they think they are here
This idea of "judging" and it being a globally bad/demeaning/unfair thing seems to be unique to the "female" psyche.It's the double standard that a lot of women who think like this object to. Why shouldn't women enjoy sex? Why shouldn't women be able to have fully formed sexual identities without being considered some sort of moral failing? Why do so many people (men and women alike) buy into the idea that women have to separate any sort of sexual desire/activity from any other aspect of their life?
Call a spade a spade, if it looks like a duck/quacks like a duck etc.
It's the double standard that a lot of women who think like this object to. Why shouldn't women enjoy sex? Why shouldn't women be able to have fully formed sexual identities without being considered some sort of moral failing? Why do so many people (men and women alike) buy into the idea that women have to separate any sort of sexual desire/activity from any other aspect of their life?
It's the double standard that a lot of women who think like this object to. Why shouldn't women enjoy sex? Why shouldn't women be able to have fully formed sexual identities without being considered some sort of moral failing? Why do so many people (men and women alike) buy into the idea that women have to separate any sort of sexual desire/activity from any other aspect of their life?I think most men are fine with women enjoying sex. But what about the other double standard? A man who wakes up next to a pig will sneak out and lie to his friends. A woman who wakes up next to an ugly guy can cry 'rape' and be taken somewhat seriously.
I think most men are fine with women enjoying sex. But what about the other double standard? A man who wakes up next to a pig will sneak out and lie to his friends. A woman who wakes up next to an ugly guy can cry 'rape' and be taken somewhat seriously.
So where are the pics of sluts walking ???
women don't usually cry rape on ugly guys..... ;D...its the guys they actually WANT and can't have that they accuse of rape out of spite
It's the double standard that a lot of women who think like this object to. Why shouldn't women enjoy sex? Why shouldn't women be able to have fully formed sexual identities without being considered some sort of moral failing? Why do so many people (men and women alike) buy into the idea that women have to separate any sort of sexual desire/activity from any other aspect of their life?No one said that a woman should not enjoy sex. This is not about that. Moderation is the key to all. Sex is enjoyable, but the reason for sex is not enjoyment, one can say that is a byproduct so that you'd want to have sex and reproduce.
I think most men are fine with women enjoying sex. But what about the other double standard? A man who wakes up next to a pig will sneak out and lie to his friends. A woman who wakes up next to an ugly guy can cry 'rape' and be taken somewhat seriously.
No one said that a woman should not enjoy sex. This is not about that. Moderation is the key to all. Sex is enjoyable, but the reason for sex is not enjoyment, one can say that is a byproduct so that you'd want to have sex and reproduce. There is no real double standard. Women give consent that men need. Women have that power. Two things run this world, money and women. We'd do anything for both. So, what happens when anybody makes themselves available? They don't get respected. They don't get appreciated. We all want what is not available to us. And so, if women make themselves available to men with no requirements, the quality of men goes down. And since women want the attention, and men want women, men must accept what women do, in order to get "that". So the quality of women goes down as well.
Also, when women collectively allow themselves to be available sexually, they become more of a commodity. You can easily get it. Women choose to remove the power and absolve themselves of the responsibility that comes with it. And there are consequences.
Like Corey Holcolm had said , "No sex for you tonight!! No, no sex FROM you tonight!"
It's not just about women who make themselves sexually available to men. It's about women having any sort of sexual identity at all. I've seen so many fitness guys on instagram talking about how women who post up selfies are sluts and bottom of the barrel bitches, even though they are posting literally the same type of pics.How did you ge that? You are taking on an extreme. Men and women live in two different worlds. The men you mention who talk like that are yes, hypocrites, but one could say that the men and women are both one in the same, hor d'oeuvres of attention.
x2 thread sucks
How did you ge that? You are taking on an extreme. Men and women live in two different worlds. The men you mention who talk like that are yes, hypocrites, but one could say that the men and women are both one in the same, hor d'oeuvres of attention.
And you know what the sad thing is? These same women that they criticize will sleep with them, because of the low self esteem and the want to be desired and the attention. Think about that.
Exactly. Many of these women (and people who profess victimhood) want to be Victor and victim all in the same time. You want to be protected and use the system against men, yet you want equality to men. Well, that means that the "protection" ends. Or men get the same "protection". This is somewhat of a backdoor acknowledgment of wanting equality only when you want it. Equality is unconditional.
So, what do you all think? Does it help or hurt women? Since many on here may practice "body shaming", should said women also be shamed for being "promiscuous"?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/04/living/amber-rose-slutwalk-feat/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/04/living/amber-rose-slutwalk-feat/index.html)
How am I taking on an extreme? ??? The double standard between how sexually active men and women are viewed is pretty clear. There is not an expectation of moderation for men. There is no character value attached to men's clothing. If a guy is unmarried but has children, there's no expectation that he should no longer have a sex life, or even have a reserved sex life.There are legitimately two standards as Women give consent. Men need opportunity. You understand that right? It is easier for a woman to get or have sex than a man. You cannot apply the same standard when men and women are different. It cannot work. Now, I as I said before moderation is the key. Excess in any direction is wrong. Just look at bodybuilding for example. It has gotten to the point where excess has created a stagnation in quality.
There are legitimately two standards as Women give consent. Men need opportunity. You understand that right? It is easier for a woman to get or have sex than a man. You cannot apply the same standard when men and women are different. It cannot work. Now, I as I said before moderation is the key. Excess in any direction is wrong. Just look at bodybuilding for example. It has gotten to the point where excess has created a stagnation in quality.
And that is what has happened to men and women. The bigger picture in all of this Women are men's quality control. And as such women are held to a HIGHER standard than men. Because they have the POWER in this regard.
And that is what it boils down to. Power and control. When you have power there comes the responsibility with that.
If a man is unmarried and has kids, there used to be a greater expectation that he takes care of them. Today, due to women not wanting to use their responsibility of keeping said men in check, they allow themselves to be available to said man. Again, women have the power to say yes or no. So who is the man having sex with?
The constant is the woman. Less women available means less sex for men, which means women can require men to take care of the kids, get a job, etc.
Ask yourself this, if someone gave you free ____ (insert name of goods) that you liked, would you take them? The answer would probably be "yes". Now, if you constantly were those free goods, it would lose it specialness, correct? There is no desire to want something as much because you don't have to work for it, and it loses its power to hold your attention. In your eyes it has lost it's value. And you have lost something yourself as well.
That is the bigger picture.
Quality. Power. Control.
(http://thefappening.so/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Amber-Rose-Naked-000.jpg)
Shes just a classic attention whore
So where are the pics of sluts walking ???
Lets ungay this thread.
(http://38.media.tumblr.com/eb0274e0de72e375e8ccad64101bd2f2/tumblr_mysti9c3c11qhwp7ho1_500.gif)
umm.. where can I watch the rest of this educational video?
(http://thefappening.so/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Amber-Rose-Naked-000.jpg)
Shes just a classic attention whore
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQaBNMbWoAA7pre.jpg)
I think Lola dropped off, she got the fake booty and blew up in Smooth Magazine, after that, what is doing now?
Amber Rose is every Striper's wildest dream......come on, I remember seeing Lola and Blac Chyna at sinsationals working the poles , they all been around the Block In PG's strip joints a few years ago and they're living the dream now.....Amber is just getting free publicity for her "new reality show" with her home Biatch Blac Chyna. it will work just perfectly.
There is a facebook page called "Women against feminism."
They posted this picture:
(http://s18.postimg.org/ez9bbp8q1/12144929_402707186605192_3550156232736413973_n.jpg)
1915: Old school/real feminists who truly desired change. Want equal rights for women.
2015: New school/fake feminists. Man haters. Don't want men to be equal; want men to be inferior. Hate equality.
Don't judge me for my lifestyle!
But make sure to buy what I'm selling...
Complete twaddle
Honestly, I think there's a difference between "don't judge me" and "I don't give a shit IF you judge me."
WOW. incredible how you get so much wrong in a few short sentences. First, society has always been set up to protect women especially from themselves... There has never been a time when men did whatever they wanted and women could not. Only the Elite ( and that included women) could do whatever they wanted . The average man was nothing but a worker drone. The vast majority didnt have a say in how society was run..couldnt vote except they had land etc...
Women are not kicking mens asses in anything.NOTHING. The schools have been redesigned to favor women and turn the boys into pseudo females. Boys are not designed to sit down for hours on end and listen to some woman babble about some topic, Even the way testing is done has been redesigned to favor women precisely because men are just better and harder working. Yes they graduate at a higher rate but with a bunch of shitty degrees and go to do nothing jobs in HR departments and business offices while the men continue to innovate, build and maintain society like we've always done.
Now once you get out into the real world...hell even higher education where those constraints are removed and boys can return to being boys, They destroy the women.. In the subjects and fields that matter ( STEM), not fucking social work and gender studies. If women are kicking mens asses why are the ratios of nobel prize winners in the mathematics and sciences so skewed towards men that women are pretty much invisible?
You've been drinking the kool-aid... they got to you. You need to purge brother. Get that shit out of your system.
you're right about one thing though. Women have always been whores but society (men ) kept them in check because a whorish female is a no good piece of trash and is worthless to the progress of society and civilization. Remove those checks and look what happens... Take a look at the matriarchal community in America which is the African American community. Just a sad state of affairs. Breeding criminal males in record numbers, Fatherless homes, single mothers, poverty etc ... thats what happens when you give women unrestricted freedom. Same shit that would happen if you gave a kid no restrictions. A fucking Disaster.
Look at the feminist controlled European countries and what is happening right now... I could go on and on and on.
Rant over.
On topic Amber Rose is a fine ass hoe. I'd hit it once or twice with no hesitation. :)
True. But this cumsucker wants to be judged. Her business model depends on it. She cares very greatly about being seen in a certain light, she would be sucking off hobo's for a shot of Robitussin if men did not see her as meat.
Aside from that last sentence, 18-karat truth.That desire to be men. So you emasculate your own men.
Many psychologists consider Penis Envy to be more than just a catchphrase; it's what fuels many third-wave Feminists. They're jealous of us as men because we've been endowed by our Creator with the testosterone that allows us to create, procreate and annihilate when He calls on us to do those things. They want it and can't have it, which is why they laugh and cheer so loudly when one of us is mutilated sexually. (Search for Catherine Kieu on YouTube.)
OH MY !!!!!!!!!!!
That desire to be men. So you emasculate your own men.
Also, none of the feminists are talking about the ex-pornstar Cytherea's rape. It's ignored. And that should be talked about at these "walks".
And that is why i say that eventually, due to the fact that Amber is attractive and was/is a stripper, that the feminist will come out and attack her.
Women of all different stripes identify themselves as feminists these days, so it's not really accurate to say that a)they think or act as a group and b)all (or even most) of their ideologies hinge on their feelings about other women's looks.Many identify as feminist as a fad or anti male. Masculinity is undermined.
I had no idea what the cytherea thing you were talking about was, so i looked it up to see why you thought it should be a feminist cause. The first thing you notice about the story is that she has never spoken about or confirmed it. The only thing I could find was a youtube video thanking her fans for support with vague allusions to the assault. Most reputable media outlets don't identify rape victims by name and feminiist groups definitely wouldn't. None of the reputable outlets that covered that story identified her by name, they only identified her as a las vegas woman. Only certain blogs revealed her identity.
Which brings up another point. Half of the results for "cytherea rape" are blog posts asking why feminists are ignoring this story ( I just told you why.) I figured this was probably the case when you brought it up- that this was less about a rape being ignored and more about a political talking point. These blogs aren't just reporting on the story, they're juxtaposing the story against political boilerplate to further an agenda. If the bloggers writing about her rape think it deserves attention, why aren't they talking/writing about it more? Why is their coverage limited to a misguided attempt to shame "feminists" into action?
Many identify as feminist as a fad or anti male. Masculinity is undermined.
As far as Cytherea, she acknowledges it, and she even said that she was going to do an inter-racial scene to say "eff them" (the three rapists were black males---the oldest one was 18. They range in age from 18, 17, 16. They burglarize her home, while her kids and man were there, and did the act via gun point). There is a case against the perps.
Blogs like Jezebel, which covers many of these issues, will not touch it. Even if mentioned to them.
Could it be that the case involves black males and a sex worker? And that many feminists are middle-upper middle class white women who spend time talking about "male patriarchy"?
Here is Mercedes Carrera talking about it
A woman identifying as a feminist doesn't undermine masculinity. And whatever reasons they call themselves feminist doesn't mean they will stop just because they don't want to support a sexy girl. I think your idea of feminists is kind of narrow. There are plenty of black feminists. There are plenty of men who understand that it's not a battle to destroy the idea of masculinity. Even though it makes anything they say easier to dismiss, it doesn't come down to trend-followers and manhaters.Maybe she can't talk about it because it's an ongoing criminal case and she is a state's witness.
Mercedes Carrera is not Cytherea. If Cytherea acknowledges it, it's not easy finding any info on her actually talking about it. Googling "cytherea talks about rape" or "cytherea confirms rape" don't turn up anything on the first page. Other than the video I talked about in the previous post, I didn't see anything about her trying to get her story out there and being ignored. I can't imagine one of the Vegas news channels or Jezebel declined an interview with her. Reputable media sources generally don't identify rape victims, especially if the victim herself is not being public about the crime. Even if there is a concerted effort by the feminist press to bury this, there are plenty of anti-feminist blogs talking about this. Why aren't they doing interviews with her? Why aren't they talking about this other than to ask why feminists aren't talking about it?
Maybe she can't talk about it because it's an ongoing criminal case and she is a state's witness.
But here is a snippet of an interview she did. Go to 8:05 to start off.
When have you ever heard of a CRIME VICTIM not speaking to the media for fear of jeopardizing the case? Criminals won't speak for fear of jeopardizing the case. Civil litigants won't speak for fear of accidentally saying something incriminating. When crime victims don't speak to the media, it's usually to maintain privacy. I've never heard of a crime victim who wanted to publicize their case not speaking because it might hurt the case.Actually it's quite common for victims to not want to speak out. Especially for the serious crimes--rapes, murders, attempted murders, serious assaults. This is often due to fear of retaliation. And many women don't want to retell the rape over and over again, reliving the traumatic event.
I have no idea where to see the whole version of the video snippet in your link, but the trend of commentators only speaking about this as part of some sort of anti-feminist propaganda continues. None of these commentators who are so concerned can figure out a way to cover the story beyond that one angle?
And what should the feminists be doing or saying? Generally, stories that become causes are stories that evolve. If the guys were caught and almost certainly going to be prosecuted, what should the feminists be doing or saying? It's like when people ask "Where's Jesse and Al? " when a white person is the victim of a crime.
Actually it's quite common for victims to not want to speak out. Especially for the serious crimes--rapes, murders, attempted murders, serious assaults. This is often due to fear of retaliation. And many women don't want to retell the rape over and over again, reliving the traumatic event.
Watch the whole vid, Tommy Sotomayor had said that there is a link underneath the vid in the description box where you can go see more of the interview.
Also, popula feminist blog sites like Jezebel will cover and talk about cases like these not when they have "evolved". One begins to think that these sites don't talk about it, is because she is a sex worker, and not just some random middle class white woman. So, in effect, their silence condones the act, not condemning it. Especially when they are so vocal about rapes, that turned out to be false (The Rolling Stones interview, etc). And that is hypocritical. Especially when you have the whole reason for the Slutwalk.
Actually it's quite common for victims to not want to speak out. Especially for the serious crimes--rapes, murders, attempted murders, serious assaults. This is often due to fear of retaliation. And many women don't want to retell the rape over and over again, reliving the traumatic event.
Watch the whole vid, Tommy Sotomayor had said that there is a link underneath the vid in the description box where you can go see more of the interview.
Also, popula feminist blog sites like Jezebel will cover and talk about cases like these not when they have "evolved".
YES, MAN! This is true! Which goes to what I have been saying about reputable media not identifying rape suspects. You said that Cytherea wasn't speaking to the media because it was an ongoing case and she was a witness, and that's why feminists should be publicizing this case. Now you are saying that it's possible that she's afraid of retaliation and reliving the pain of the event and THAT is why feminists should be publicizing this case. If she's afraid of retaliation and reliving the event, WHY WOULD ANY DECENT PERSON PUBLICIZE THIS CASE AGAINST HER WILL? How would that be helping her? It can't be both reasons.I never said that she wasn't. I said that "maybe she can't." I also said it was common for those who victims of violent crimes not to speak out on them, due to being a state's witness or for fear of retaliation. Also, There are certain things about cases that you don't want to get out into public, so that the defense can use.
The video says that there is a link in the description box, but the link takes you to a link of the Mercedes Carrera video. Obviously there's some video out there, but this just goes to show how hard it is to find any info from Cytherea herself about this case. If she wanted her side out there, she could have easily posted a vid up on her youtube channel. If she doesn't want her story out there, no reputable media and no decent person (feminist or otherwise) would make it political boilerplate without her consent.
That's exactly how any media outlet works, covering stories that have multiple angles and evolving issues. Do you remember any of the details of the alleged UVA rape case? The author of the story alleged that the school mishandled the investigation and none of the supsects were arrested after more than 3 years. In the Cytherea case, suspects were apprehended in a matter of weeks with some solid evidence. They are different types of stories. The whole purpose of the UVA Rolling Stone story (even though it turned out to be false) was that the alleged victim wasn't getting justice. How is that the case if suspects are arrested and likely going to be convicted?
If the bloggers writing about her rape think it deserves attention, why aren't they talking/writing about it more? Why is their coverage limited to a misguided attempt to shame "feminists" into action?
I never said that she wasn't. I said that "maybe she can't." I also said it was common for those who victims of violent crimes not to speak out on them, due to being a state's witness or for fear of retaliation. Also, There are certain things about cases that you don't want to get out into public, so that the defense can use.
Whatever her reasons for not going indepth, I have never flip flopped.
And so are you in a backdoor way trying to deny that this happened to her? Because that is what it seems like. Like someone saying "The top 10 Pro IFBB bodybuilders use Drugs", and another person saying, "Do you know that the top 10 Pro bodybuilders use drugs? Have you asked them? Do you know them personally?"
So, with the line of questioning and your line of thought, it seems that you are skeptical that this happened to Cytherea, unless she comes out and says, 3 men raped me" and then started to talk about it in detail.
You have a snippet of an interview, you have other female pornstars talking about it. And raising awareness of it. And you say that you can't find anything on it?
Huh, can't find anything on it?
Again, as you said that is the way the media is suppose to work. But, many times in this piss poor quality of reporting that is the mainstay of today's media, it doesn't happen like that. Media outlets want to the be first with the news, and that usually means not waiting for the correct info.
Also, maybe you need to take a look at many of the feminist blogs, like Jezebel. They recently had an article on about a recent rape, they go hard on it.
http://jezebel.com/why-would-police-arrest-a-19-year-old-girl-for-reportin-1733296948 (http://jezebel.com/why-would-police-arrest-a-19-year-old-girl-for-reportin-1733296948)