Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on March 07, 2016, 07:29:04 AM
-
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/
-
Doesn't matter. Whether it gets cold or hot it's still climate change which is always bad no matter what and the fault of American big business supported by the conservatives.
-
So was our record hot summer last year just a mirage (7th floor near the ice machine? )
-
So was our record hot summer last year just a mirage (7th floor near the ice machine? )
As with the record cold in the east. What are they going to name this time? Global warming and climate change have already been taken.
-
were they referring to surface and sea surface temps, radiosonde data is upper air
-
I don't know why all of the pushback against trying to keep a cleaner planet? Whether or not it's man made or part of some cycle of the earth, why would you not want to have less pollution? I'm right wing as fuck, but so much smog and burning shot can't be good.
-
As with the record cold in the east. What are they going to name this time? Global warming and climate change have already been taken.
more record warms than record colds equals warming.
HTH.
-
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/
So you dont believe In global warming?
-
I don't know why all of the pushback against trying to keep a cleaner planet? Whether or not it's man made or part of some cycle of the earth, why would you not want to have less pollution? I'm right wing as fuck, but so much smog and burning shot can't be good.
You sound more like a far left anarchist with that climate change diatribe.
-
So you dont believe In global warming?
It's more of a tax grab than a real issue. Making a crisis out of nothing.
-
It's more of a tax grab than a real issue. Making a crisis out of nothing.
wow, you really are a stupid fuck? :-\
-
I don't know why all of the pushback against trying to keep a cleaner planet? Whether or not it's man made or part of some cycle of the earth, why would you not want to have less pollution? I'm right wing as fuck, but so much smog and burning shot can't be good.
Everyone wants a clean planet however the us government punishes American businesses with so many regulations that they go overseas..no matter what we do here you have other countries with no regulations where coke plants are putting out so much pollution that kids playing are covered in black powder. So unless every country is on board we are just hurting ourselves
-
Our purpose is to make plastic, rocket fuel and pollute the earth enough that we leave and spread life to other planets...after that life will do away with us. Don't fight the flow.
-
wow, you really are a stupid fuck? :-\
This is the best you can do? You must be a Sanders supporter. The 70's we were going to freeze over now we're going to burn up. Al Gore said that last month (the 10th year) we would be non existent (or some stupid shit like that). Keep drinking the kool-aid junior.
-
This is the best you can do? You must be a Sanders supporter. The 70's we were going to freeze over now we're going to burn up. Al Gore said that last month (the 10th year) we would be non existent (or some stupid shit like that). Keep drinking the kool-aid junior.
nope. But, I'm starting to feel sorry for you're little midget dumb-as-fuck ass.
-
better back off. "ht texan" is speaking from his science lab where he practices science and knows all the answers.
-
better back off. "ht texan" is speaking from his science lab where he practices science and knows all the answers.
yes gimmick. My lab is awesome. ::)
-
yes gimmick. My lab is awesome. ::)
Labs are great dogs, you know. ;D As to global warming, I tend to think it became "climate change" because we have four seasons and libtards want to do their chicken little song and dance act more than just in the Summer.
Whatever. If this is your faith, then by all means, you live it i.e., sans electricity, gas, modern conveniences, etc. Just don't force others to kneel before your choice in a god.
-
Labs are great dogs, you know. ;D As to global warming, I tend to think it became "climate change" because we have four seasons and libtards want to do their chicken little song and dance act more than just in the Summer.
Whatever. If this is your faith, then by all means, you live it i.e., sans electricity, gas, modern conveniences, etc. Just don't force others to kneel before your choice in a god.
Boston's are better then labs.
-
nope. But, I'm starting to feel sorry for you're little midget dumb-as-fuck ass.
So the typical lib answer when they can't argue is this ^^^^
Run along little man and go study the bullshit you're being fed.
-
Global warming figures don't come from hard data. They don't come from actual measured temperatures. They come from computer simulations. So.........
Their stuff is very convincing though because it usually comes with a picture of a polar bear standing on a small piece of ice floating somewhere in the arctic. Gets you right in the feels.
-
It's more of a tax grab than a real issue. Making a crisis out of nothing.
Could you ever support a republican who supported this global warming bullshit?
Never mind, you won't answer ;)
-
Getbig,
Can I see some of your experiments that prove you are right and that 99 percent of Scientists are wrong.
-
Getbig,
Can I see some of your experiments that prove you are right and that 99 percent of Scientists.
Clown,
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle
-
There's no way you can't believe that the climate is changing... Forget all the science for a second and just think about it... There are more cars on the road, more planes in the air, pollution is at an all time high in some of the major cities, more electronics being used then ever before, each of these gadgets emitting heat, an absurd amount of wireless networks, cell networks, satellite networks, microwave networks, emitting so much radiation, air conditioners extracting and recycling artificial hot air into the atmosphere. Just ask yourself where does all this energy go? Energy cannot be created nor destroyed so it has to go somewhere.
-
There's no way you can't believe that the climate is changing... Forget all the science for a second and just think about it... There are more cars on the road, more planes in the air, pollution is at an all time high in some of the major cities, more electronics being used then ever before, each of these gadgets emitting heat, an absurd amount of wireless networks, cell networks, satellite networks, microwave networks, emitting so much radiation, air conditioners extracting and recycling artificial hot air into the atmosphere. Just ask yourself where does all this energy go? Energy cannot be created nor destroyed so it has to go somewhere.
You weren't around in the late 60's - 70's when schools (at least in LA) closed on certain days. These days were called "smog days". It was so bad that it literally made it hard to breath. This was before smog testing for automobiles, catiletic converters, etc. we have come along way since that time. But even when data goes back that far, even that didn't cause much if any change. Liberals myth is that repubs don't care about the environment, it's a load of crap. I live in the most conservative county in california and we're probably just as if not more conscientious about our beaches than anyone on either coast. My house is on the beach. I don't know one single person who doesn't care about having trash and pollution on our beaches and waters.
-
All this talk about Global warming. One Super Volcano erupts tomorrow and part of the world will be in an Ice Age/Nuclear winter.
-
You weren't around in the late 60's - 70's when schools (at least in LA) closed on certain days. These days were called "smog days". It was so bad that it literally made it hard to breath. This was before smog testing for automobiles, catiletic converters, etc. we have come along way since that time. But even when data goes back that far, even that didn't cause much if any change. Liberals myth is that repubs don't care about the environment, it's a load of crap. I live in the most conservative county in california and we're probably just as if not more conscientious about our beaches than anyone on either coast. My house is on the beach. I don't know one single person who doesn't care about having trash and pollution on our beaches and waters.
As there are cities and towns that are more conscious of this, there are other areas that are not, there are countries that are progressive in going green and others that are so far behind. You can't think of just what your town does. Think of the overpopulated countries like China and India that have much higher populations, much higher pollution, and weak environmental initiatives. Do you truly believe the atmosphere is not being impacted? Like at all? Not even a little bit?
-
There's no way you can't believe that the climate is changing... Forget all the science for a second and just think about it... There are more cars on the road, more planes in the air, pollution is at an all time high in some of the major cities, more electronics being used then ever before, each of these gadgets emitting heat, an absurd amount of wireless networks, cell networks, satellite networks, microwave networks, emitting so much radiation, air conditioners extracting and recycling artificial hot air into the atmosphere. Just ask yourself where does all this energy go? Energy cannot be created nor destroyed so it has to go somewhere.
Yes but the electric waves cancel out the increased carbon. You didn't account for that.
Look it up!
-
Clown,
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle
Pretty sure that I know the answer to the following question, but: Did you actually read the content of the link you posted? Even the extremely biased republican website you got this from has to acknowledge that even their cherry-picked data signals that most climate scientists agree in man-made global warming.
...it’s not unlikely that most scientists involved in climate-related studies believe in anthropogenic global warming, and likely believe, too, that it presents a problem. However, there is no consensus approaching 97 percent.
Also, nobody takes a website seriously if it has the following three links to other articles. "Getting Rich of Climate Extremism", an indictment against someone who the story claims, has said "We should hate Republicans", and "Carly Fiorina shows how to address the left on Climate Change". Not at all unbiased...
Overall, sensible people go where the evidence takes them. Extremists like you and your low-brow ilk are easy cannon fodder in debates that rage, hired (for free!) to fight a battle in which you don't even know what 'your side' is actually fighting for. Are there excesses in the green lobby? Of course! Al Gore is pretty obviously a crook, in it for his personal gain. But that just invalidates Al Gore the person, not by association also Climate Change. Just like I don't think climate change deniers are mostly bad people. Just the ones like the Koch brothers, who drum up simpletons or buy some unscrupulous scientists to fight on their behalf.
-
http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/
So, this guy takes two data sets about two different things - one is a data set of surface measurements and the other is a data set of atmospheric measurements (see radiosonde (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiosonde)) - plots them and sticks the charts together until they "connect" and then draws a red line and pretends the data is meaningful without any adjustment or normalization? And people take this seriously?
I mean, I can see you, Joe, taking it seriously. You don't have the background to critically evaluate the claims in that article. Hell, you don't have the background to critically evaluate the statement "during a leap year the sun sets in the east, which is why the moon is made of cheese." You just accept both on faith, if the voice from talk radio says it's true. Because the voice is never wrong.
By the way, here's a chart (put together using this methodology) that shows the Federal deficit in billions of dollas, from 1901 until 2019. I marked some important events on the chart, to help give the numbers some context. Clearly, we need to have more leg workouts while, simultaneously, sending a crack team of soldiers to find and kill neu-Hitler to prevent the automatic installation of World War 2 Service Pack 1. It can cause problems with USB toaster ovens.
-
Global warming figures don't come from hard data. They don't come from actual measured temperatures. They come from computer simulations. So.........
Their stuff is very convincing though because it usually comes with a picture of a polar bear standing on a small piece of ice floating somewhere in the arctic. Gets you right in the feels.
Getbig poll: Who is the stupider of the stupid fucks? Coach is Back or Pray4War?
-
There's no way you can't believe that the climate is changing... Forget all the science for a second and just think about it... There are more cars on the road, more planes in the air, pollution is at an all time high in some of the major cities, more electronics being used then ever before, each of these gadgets emitting heat, an absurd amount of wireless networks, cell networks, satellite networks, microwave networks, emitting so much radiation, air conditioners extracting and recycling artificial hot air into the atmosphere. Just ask yourself where does all this energy go? Energy cannot be created nor destroyed so it has to go somewhere.
I'm surprised at you because you are so intelligent. I guess propaganda gets the best of them.
Arch, pollution is not at an all time high. It's at an all time low. Cars today run so much cleaner and more fuel efficient than just ten years ago and keeps getting better. Industries run so much cleaner. Don't you remember how cities like Pittsburgh and Detroit use to be?
There are more trees now than ever before. There was no such thing as recycling not too long ago. You can now swim in the Hudson River despite a million people flushing their toilets nearby.
It too bad that so many people do so much to improve conditions for everybody and it's just ignored. It's like America is the cause for the all the grief in the world. Pollution? America is the biggest polluter? How about China and Russia? Few if any regulations and they don't give a crap.
What specific city is pollution higher than it ever was before? Name just one.
-
The increase in global temperatures since the late 19th century just reflects the end of the Little Ice Age. The global temperature trends since then have followed not rising CO2 trends but the ocean temperature cycles of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). Every 20 to 30 years, the much colder water near the bottom of the oceans cycles up to the top, where it has a slight cooling effect on global temperatures until the sun warms that water. That warmed water then contributes to slightly warmer global temperatures, until the next churning cycle.
Those ocean temperature cycles, and the continued recovery from the Little Ice Age, are primarily why global temperatures rose from 1915 until 1945, when CO2 emissions were much lower than in recent years. The change to a cold ocean temperature cycle, primarily the PDO, is the main reason that global temperatures declined from 1945 until the late 1970s, despite the soaring CO2 emissions during that time from the postwar industrialization spreading across the globe.
The 20 to 30 year ocean temperature cycles turned back to warm from the late 1970s until the late 1990s, which is the primary reason that global temperatures warmed during this period. But that warming ended 15 years ago, and global temperatures have stopped increasing since then, if not actually cooled, even though global CO2 emissions have soared over this period. As The Economist magazine reported in March, “The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750.” Yet, still no warming during that time. That is because the CO2 greenhouse effect is weak and marginal compared to natural causes of global temperature changes.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/05/26/to-the-horror-of-global-warming-alarmists-global-cooling-is-here/#200d581269bb (http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/05/26/to-the-horror-of-global-warming-alarmists-global-cooling-is-here/#200d581269bb)
-
So, this guy takes two data sets about two different things - one is a data set of surface measurements and the other is a data set of atmospheric measurements (see radiosonde (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiosonde)) - plots them and sticks the charts together until they "connect" and then draws a red line and pretends the data is meaningful without any adjustment or normalization? And people take this seriously?
I mean, I can see you, Joe, taking it seriously. You don't have the background to critically evaluate the claims in that article. Hell, you don't have the background to critically evaluate the statement "during a leap year the sun sets in the east, which is why the moon is made of cheese." You just accept both on faith, if the voice from talk radio says it's true. Because the voice is never wrong.
By the way, here's a chart (put together using this methodology) that shows the Federal deficit in billions of dollas, from 1901 until 2019. I marked some important events on the chart, to help give the numbers some context. Clearly, we need to have more leg workouts while, simultaneously, sending a crack team of soldiers to find and kill neu-Hitler to prevent the automatic installation of World War 2 Service Pack 1. It can cause problems with USB toaster ovens.
I don't take it seriously and realize it's total bullshit and a scam but if you want to buying into it then thats on you. It's not ever going to effect me, you, my kids, my grand kids, great grand kids, great great grand kids, great great great grand kids, great great great great great grand kids and probably beyond that. But as of today it doesn't affect my, yours or anyone elses with the exception of those children that have bought into what liberal professors and left wingnut politicians have fed to them. It's a total scam.
-
I don't take it seriously and realize it's total bullshit and a scam but if you want to buying into it then thats on you. It's not ever going to effect me, you, my kids, my grand kids, great grand kids, great great grand kids, great great great grand kids, great great great great great grand kids and probably beyond that. But as of today it doesn't affect my, yours or anyone elses with the exception of those children that have bought into what liberal professors and left wingnut politicians have fed to them. It's a total scam.
insert "conservative neo-cons and right wingnut politicians" into your last sentence and that describes you, so what is the difference? you preach and practice your dogma, while others practice and preach another. now your king shit cuz your side is right and the other is totally wrong? lol, more "my team is better than your team" from coach. political arguing is so funny, i hear the old folks talking about politicians at country kitchen buffet, so funny how they talk loud so other people can hear them. adult fandom for people with nothing else going on in their lives. damn it felt so good when i stopped caring or even watching political theatre. it was like a liberation of sorts. try it coach,
-
strangely obsessive posting from coach once again
nobody actually denies climate change anymore, time to update the talking points
-
strangely obsessive posting from coach once again
nobody actually denies climate change anymore, time to update the talking points
I'm not denying climate change, it happens every day all day and night. "Global Warming" is the joke.
-
I don't take it seriously and realize it's total bullshit and a scam but if you want to buying into it then thats on you. It's not ever going to effect me, you, my kids, my grand kids, great grand kids, great great grand kids, great great great grand kids, great great great great great grand kids and probably beyond that. But as of today it doesn't affect my, yours or anyone elses with the exception of those children that have bought into what liberal professors and left wingnut politicians have fed to them. It's a total scam.
That depends on what you mean by "it". The data doesn't lie: the planet is warming. We can debate whether this is a natural process or not. We can discuss about the weight different factors play in that warming. We can even talk about whether humans should be taking measures to help prevent it.
But the planet is warming. This isn't a figment of people's imaginations or the results of conspiracies involving thousands of scientists over a period of decades.
You say that this won't affect you or your kids and grandkids. The reality is that the climate can be very fragile; are you sure that an increase of 2 degrees won't have disastrous long-term consequences that affect your grandkids when they're in their 30s or 40s? Don't you feel the slightest obligation to the human race to try and avoid fucking up the planet (I'm talking more generally here than just climate change and global warming) if you can do so without sacrificing yourself?
-
Getbig is a bastion of outright stupidity that of which does not know how to process information, does not know what data and evidence are, cannot distinguish fact from fiction, and is unable to navigate the world beyond their own bias.
Its a good representation of the population in general. The sliding scale of stupidity is tipped further in their favor than for the intelligent.
Luckily, Scientific Fact and Consensus are true even if idiots don't want to acknowledge it.
-
That depends on what you mean by "it". The data doesn't lie: the planet is warming. We can debate whether this is a natural process or not. We can discuss about the weight different factors play in that warming. We can even talk about whether humans should be taking measures to help prevent it.
But the planet is warming. This isn't a figment of people's imaginations or the results of conspiracies involving thousands of scientists over a period of decades.
You say that this won't affect you or your kids and grandkids. The reality is that the climate can be very fragile; are you sure that an increase of 2 degrees won't have disastrous long-term consequences that affect your grandkids when they're in their 30s or 40s? Don't you feel the slightest obligation to the human race to try and avoid fucking up the planet (I'm talking more generally here than just climate change and global warming) if you can do so without sacrificing yourself?
We should not even worry about Coach's offspring. They will be assuredly as dumb as he is anyways.
-
lol my coach post ignored as always
-
It's more of a tax grab than a real issue. Making a crisis out of nothing.
what part of Bernie's tax plan do you dislike, specifically? The small increase in the $250,001 category, is that it?
Vague/insults/dodges for answers are not acceptable.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ca03cz3WwAAWEmT.png)
-
Getbig is a bastion of outright stupidity that of which does not know how to process information, does not know what data and evidence are, cannot distinguish fact from fiction, and is unable to navigate the world beyond their own bias.
Its a good representation of the population in general. The sliding scale of stupidity is tipped further in their favor than for the intelligent.
Luckily, Scientific Fact and Consensus are true even if idiots don't want to acknowledge it.
Posts: 47394
-
Posts: 47394
That only comes to 11.548 per day since I have been here.
Not that much when you think about it and put it in context in 11 plus years.
-
what part of Bernie's tax plan do you dislike, specifically? The small increase in the $250,001 category, is that it?
Vague/insults/dodges for answers are not acceptable.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ca03cz3WwAAWEmT.png)
The part where Bernie Sanders thinks that his ends justify the seizure of other people's means! I would not be affected by the 52% rate that he proposes, but I am fundamentally opposed to (a) essentially forcing someone to work for the government for half of their time and (b) the notion underlying his position on taxes: that it's the government's job to take care of me.
Frankly, if I wanted that shit, I'd move to Sweden.
-
The part where Bernie Sanders thinks that his ends justify the seizure of my means!
I doubt you earn near that much money.
-
The part where Bernie Sanders thinks that his ends justify the seizure of other people's means! I would not be affected by the 52% rate that he proposes, but I am fundamentally opposed to (a) essentially forcing someone to work for the government for half of their time and (b) the notion underlying his position on taxes: that it's the government's job to take care of me.
Frankly, if I wanted that shit, I'd move to Sweden.
.
-
I doubt you earn near that much money.
You may doubt that all you want - what I make is none of your business. More than that, whether I am personally affected or not isn't relevant: I can still be opposed to the policy that the government should seize people's means to achieve Bernie Sanders' ends.
-
You may doubt that all you want - what I make is none of your business. More than that, whether I am personally affected or not isn't relevant: I can still be opposed to the policy that the government should seize people's means to achieve Bernie Sanders' ends.
Of course you can. You can also support policies that ruin the country and your own prosperity simultaneously.
-
You can also support policies that ruin the country and your own prosperity simultaneously.
I'm a rational person. The reason why I don't support Sanders' positions is exactly because they would ruin my prosperity and the country. Why would I support some other policies that achieve the same end result?
-
I'm a rational person. The reason why I don't support Sanders' positions is exactly because they would ruin my prosperity and the country. Why would I support some other policies that achieve the same end result?
Based on everything I DO know about you, I think you are wrong and misinformed.
-
Based on everything I DO know about you, I think you are wrong and misinformed.
I don' quite care what you think - especially when you're so vague about why you think it. But I like a good debate, so if you care to be specific, then I'm happy to discuss the topic with you and prove you wrong.
-
As stated before Sanders is basically FDR reincarnate
If you're opposed to New Deal type initiatives you're not going to like Sanders.
(http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/2009/02/03/30sgdp.jpg)
-
I don' quite care what you think - especially when you're so vague about why you think it. But I like a good debate, so if you care to be specific, then I'm happy to discuss the topic with you and prove you wrong.
We can't have this discussion because I have no interest in hounding you about your income that you supposedly make that puts you in the one percent of all people in the United States, right there with Gates and Buffet.
-
I'm not denying climate change, it happens every day all day and night. "Global Warming" is the joke.
have you forwarded this information to NASA, the US NAVY, NOAA, IBM etc?
They should be updated with this new information before they get too far with their "Global Warming" initiatives.
-
Getbig is a bastion of outright stupidity that of which does not know how to process information, does not know what data and evidence are, cannot distinguish fact from fiction, and is unable to navigate the world beyond their own bias.
Its a good representation of the population in general. The sliding scale of stupidity is tipped further in their favor than for the intelligent.
Luckily, Scientific Fact and Consensus are true even if idiots don't want to acknowledge it.
This.
-
As stated before Sanders is basically FDR reincarnate
If you're opposed to New Deal type initiatives you're not going to like Sanders.
(http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/2009/02/03/30sgdp.jpg)
-
If you accept ANY tax rate besides flat rate purchase, then u already agree with socialism.
People are mad that Bernie wants a little more socialism than the republican running. Only those with a flat tax on purchases truly can take the moral high ground here.
Saying 35% reiblican rate is cool, but Bernie is a communist because he wants to make it 37%? Come on
-
I'm a rational person. The reason why I don't support Sanders' positions is exactly because they would ruin my prosperity and the country. Why would I support some other policies that achieve the same end result?
You mean you wouldn't want this? What's wrong with you? ;)
In Venezuela's capital, residents fear for their safety
CARACAS: Venezuela's capital, Caracas, has overtaken the Honduran city of San Pedro Sula as the most violent urban area in the world, according to an annual ranking published by a Mexican non-profit organisation.
One of the victims of violence in Caracas was Liliana Villegas. In 2009, the postgraduate student and mother of one was allegedly shot dead by four men on motorbikes. The four accused have still not faced a full trial because the authorities are overwhelmed by a backlog of cases.
Six years on, Liliana’s mother Miriam still mourns. "For as long as I live, it will be very hard, because she was all I had. She was my friend, my daughter, my companion, she was my everything. And in just one day, I lost her. What worries me is the fact that her son will never have a mother,” she said.
The Mexican non-profit organisation The Citizen's Council for Public Security and Criminal Justice said that in 2015, there were 119 murders in Caracas for every 100,000 people. Its murder rate surpassed the Honduran city of San Pedro Sula, which saw some improvements last year.
"Murder, kidnapping and armed robbery - those three crimes determine how violent a city is, and Venezuela, and specifically Caracas, has become the most dangerous city on the planet. The levels of violence are beyond comprehension,” said criminal lawyer Femin Marmol Garcia.
Said Miriam: "Here we don't have any protection or support from the government. My life was destroyed, half of me died when my daughter died, and that hurts. And her memory will live on in me, until I die. And if, after six years these criminals can be free after what they did, then that isn't justice."
However, the socialist government has insisted that the necessary measures are taken to stop the problem.
"There have been more than 17 security campaigns in the country from former President Hugo Chavez to current president Nicolas Maduro, who have tried to fight against insecurity in the city,” said Nickmer Evans, former advisor of Chavez’s government.
-
We can't have this discussion because I have no interest in hounding you about your income that you supposedly make that puts you in the one percent of all people in the United States, right there with Gates and Buffet.
It's not like making over $250,000 a year - the threshold where I would be affected according to Sanders - is the stuff of legends and fairy-tales.
-
It's not like making over $250,000 a year - the threshold where I would be affected according to Sanders - is the stuff of legends and fairy-tales.
For you it is, cupcake. You are not close to that.
-
For you it is, cupcake. You are not close to that.
Huh. I best file a 1040-X.
-
what part of Bernie's tax plan do you dislike, specifically? The small increase in the $250,001 category, is that it?
Vague/insults/dodges for answers are not acceptable.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ca03cz3WwAAWEmT.png)
Irrelevant. Why do you post blatant bullshit? But if you want to start, lets start with this coming from a left wing rag. There is something mentally wrong with people who support this clown.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernie-sanders-tax-increases-220267
-
Irrelevant. Why do you post blatant bullshit? But if you want to start, lets start with this coming from a left wing rag. There is something mentally wrong with people who support this clown.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernie-sanders-tax-increases-220267
I remember you trashing Politico when they claimed Ben Carson's team admitted lying.
Are they credible now?
-
I remember you trashing Politico when they claimed Ben Carson's team admitted lying.
Are they credible now?
A bias left rag exposing their own. Even they can see through his bullshit......
-
A bias left rag exposing their own. Even they can see through his bullshit......
So you're saying Politico is credible... "some of the time"?
-