Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: bigkahuna on July 03, 2017, 03:22:06 AM
-
I know its bodybuilding...but c'mon with all the gear etc floating through his veins he should be getting 30+ reps with 100lb dumbells
2:53 mark
v=8T5NID10NPg
-
More than the poundages, i see a guy with no drive to workout. It's like he isn't motivated at all. We all have bad days like that, so why does he videotape it?
-
That's not struggling. Remember this is the same dude that got 46 reps with 225.
-
A lot of pros seem to get weaker as they get bigger...Phil is prob not as strong now as when he was younger and smaller
-
I think that Phil could get a ton of reps with that weight if he used his triceps more. But I think that he was purposely trying to not use is triceps. Phil was just using his pecs to move the weight (and his pecs were pre-exhausted)
-
Multiple Mr O
Who cares how strong he is?
He should be getting credit that he can gain so much using so little weight....
-
Multiple Mr O
Who cares how strong he is?
He should be getting credit that he can gain so much using so little weight....
moving heavier and heavier weight ie. Progressive Overload isn't the only way to build muscle size (and I believed that shit for . years :-X >:()
fatiguing the muscle and making it work til failure is the actual key, and you can do that with higher reps or with slower more controlled reps, and neither requires one to use such heavy ass loads
-
moving heavier and heavier weight ie. Progressive Overload isn't the only way to build muscle size (and I believed that shit for . years :-X >:()
fatiguing the muscle and making it work til failure is the actual key, and you can do that with higher reps or with slower more controlled reps, and neither requires one to use such heavy ass loads
WHY THEN DO YOU KEEP BANGING ON ABOUT YOUR WEIGHTS IMPROVING EVERY WEEK?
-
WHY THEN DO YOU KEEP BANGING ON ABOUT YOUR WEIGHTS IMPROVING EVERY WEEK?
coz . nowadays I train to be strong and athletic, not as a faggybuilder
-
coz . nowadays I train to be strong and athletic, not as a faggybuilder
Ah yes... because you had great success as a bodybuilder....
-
To be fair, that was at the end of his workout. Also him and Cutler aren't really guys that enjoy being big and big lifting weights, at least not anymore, so you've just to to take it as it is. They're doing just enough to win.
-
Weights used are irrelevant....in fact, is there any method to his training at all? Just random ordered exercises to increase volume.
It doesn't matter at all though, as bethere said. Only thing that matters is how he looks one day out of the year.
-
He should be getting credit that he can gain so much using so little weight....
Most people infer that there is little to no conscious involvement in this, thus nothing worthy of praise.
-
Most people infer that there is little to no conscious involvement in this, thus nothing worthy of praise.
so if someone uses a fork lift to load a lorry he should get less praise than someone who loads it by hand?
-
Weights used are irrelevant....in fact, is there any method to his training at all? Just random ordered exercises to increase volume.
It doesn't matter at all though, as bethere said. Only thing that matters is how he looks one day out of the year.
Exactly! There are many men who can lift more? Yes! How many are on the Olympia stage? Almost none! Same goes for when people talked shit about Dillet being lazy. And look where his laziness got him: on the Olympus stage, while thousands of "hard workers" couldn't!
-
What really matters is the amount of Increlex, Humatrope, and slin that is used. Weights don't mean shit.
-
http://i.imgur.com/98yMtz7.gif (http://i.imgur.com/98yMtz7.gif)
-
so if someone uses a fork lift to load a lorry he should get less praise than someone who loads it by hand?
I dunno but im not an ego lifter either
-
More than the poundages, i see a guy with no drive to workout. It's like he isn't motivated at all. We all have bad days like that, so why does he videotape it?
X2
-
Guys watching Arnold work arms and chest where stunned at how little weight he used. His response was he was working his muscle directly not aiding the exercise with other secondary muscles.
-
example guy I train with has very strong tris and for hi its his best body part'arms'he slender in torso thickness and presses dbells for weighing 170 lbs 95/100's like nothing,but has pancake pecs 'I tell him to push with the chest'feel'even when he lightens load his tris still must be pushing the work,i do less weight have better pecs than him
-
videos need to be entertaining and in order to be entertaining big weights need to be moved or the person moving big weights need to hurt themselves in the video.
-
videos need to be entertaining and in order to be entertaining big weights need to be moved or the person moving big weights need to hurt themselves in the video.
Videoes need to be videoes in order to be considered videoes
-
example guy I train with has very strong tris and for hi its his best body part'arms'he slender in torso thickness and presses dbells for weighing 170 lbs 95/100's like nothing,but has pancake pecs 'I tell him to push with the chest'feel'even when he lightens load his tris still must be pushing the work,i do less weight have better pecs than him
he must not be A-rab then as they have hhorrible tricep genetics
-
he must not be A-rab then as they have hhorrible tricep genetics
FROM TURKEY
-
I dunno but im not an ego lifter either
that wasnt the point i was making......
-
If you were making a point with that comparison, I fear I missed it
-
If you were making a point with that comparison, I fear I missed it
the point was you dont get kudos for breaking your back doing something when the same can be achieved with brain cells.
-
Muscle growth has probably always come very easy to the stinking cu nt, if you have a few million in the bank your not going to go out hand digging foundations for £30 a shift
-
example guy I train with has very strong tris and for hi its his best body part'arms'he slender in torso thickness and presses dbells for weighing 170 lbs 95/100's like nothing,but has pancake pecs 'I tell him to push with the chest'feel'even when he lightens load his tris still must be pushing the work,i do less weight have better pecs than him
I rarely go below 8 reps/set and have more mass than heavy trainers. People have asked me about it, I simply tell them they are using too much weight (i.e. ego training) and losing the feel of the exercise. In my 33 years of experience, more volume and sets always got me more size/results than heavy weights. If I can't get at least 8 reps with a certain weight, I don't do it. It's also the reason I am still training and most of my buds from the 80's and 90's are done because of injuries... some were very serious.
-
I rarely go below 8 reps/set and have more mass than heavy trainers. People have asked me about it, I simply tell them they are using too much weight (i.e. ego training) and losing the feel of the exercise. In my 33 years of experience, more volume and sets always got me more size/results than heavy weights. If I can't get at least 8 reps with a certain weight, I don't do it. It's also the reason I am still training and most of my buds from the 80's and 90's are done because of injuries... some were very serious.
great post, and right on most people in the gym are morons and train to heavy.
-
I rarely go below 8 reps/set and have more mass than heavy trainers. People have asked me about it, I simply tell them they are using too much weight (i.e. ego training) and losing the feel of the exercise. In my 33 years of experience, more volume and sets always got me more size/results than heavy weights. If I can't get at least 8 reps with a certain weight, I don't do it. It's also the reason I am still training and most of my buds from the 80's and 90's are done because of injuries... some were very serious.
Great advice.
-
I rarely go below 8 reps/set and have more mass than heavy trainers. People have asked me about it, I simply tell them they are using too much weight (i.e. ego training) and losing the feel of the exercise. In my 33 years of experience, more volume and sets always got me more size/results than heavy weights. If I can't get at least 8 reps with a certain weight, I don't do it. It's also the reason I am still training and most of my buds from the 80's and 90's are done because of injuries... some were very serious.
Do you use AAS? If so, what are you running?
-
the point was you dont get kudos for breaking your back doing something when the same can be achieved with brain cells.
I agree, but brain cells are sort of at a premium when it comes to the average gym rat.
-
Do you use AAS? If so, what are you running?
I dabbled in the early 90's and early 2000's. Clean since then.
Volume/higher reps yields the best results for me. Of course you have to do everything else right too.
-
I dabbled in the early 90's and early 2000's. Clean since then.
Volume/higher reps yields the best results for me. Of course you have to do everything else right too.
I was just curious, a name like "Mr Anabolic" led me to suspect otherwise
-
I was just curious, a name like "Mr Anabolic" led me to suspect otherwise
I created my account while I was running a cycle ;D
-
Not this again!!!
You just can't satisfy certain people. The same folks that pick on Heath for supposedly using light weights and being "all drugs" will turn right around and laugh at people like Coleman because of all the injuries he's sustained because of his training style (coupled with his football injuries).
-
Multiple Mr O
Who cares how strong he is?
He should be getting credit that he can gain so much using so little weight....
So little weight, so many drugs. Phildo the living butt-plug.
-
Not this again!!!
You just can't satisfy certain people. The same folks that pick on Heath for supposedly using light weights and being "all drugs" will turn right around and laugh at people like Coleman because of all the injuries he's sustained because of his training style (coupled with his football injuries).
It's a pretty well known fact that just about everybody on earth, other than getbig experts are doing everything wrong.
-
It's a pretty well known fact that just about everybody on earth, other than getbig experts are doing everything wrong.
We choose not to win the Olympia not because it is hard, but because it is easy.
-
It's a pretty well known fact that just about everybody on earth, other than getbig experts are doing everything wrong.
It's lifting weights, not rocket science
-
It's lifting weights, not rocket science
What is rocket science, but lifting bigger weights?
-
I rarely go below 8 reps/set and have more mass than heavy trainers. People have asked me about it, I simply tell them they are using too much weight (i.e. ego training) and losing the feel of the exercise. In my 33 years of experience, more volume and sets always got me more size/results than heavy weights. If I can't get at least 8 reps with a certain weight, I don't do it. It's also the reason I am still training and most of my buds from the 80's and 90's are done because of injuries... some were very serious.
took me 20 some years to figure this out
how often do you take your sets to failure?
-
took me 20 some years to figure this out
how often do you take your sets to failure?
epic troll post yet again....
subtle though I will give you that.
-
epic troll post yet again....
subtle though I will give you that.
???
so speaking the truth is a troll post?
listen stumpy, I did gear and I found out it didn't do too much for me
my best natty was a buck 67 @ 7-8% my best enhanced was a buck 76 @ 7-8%
gear did make me a bit fuller and more vascular and gage me a bit more "pop" to my muscles, but I didn't gain much lean dry muscle on it
-
???
so speaking the truth is a troll post?
listen stumpy, I did gear and I found out it didn't do too much for me
my best natty was a buck 67 @ 7-8% my best enhanced was a buck 76 @ 7-8%
gear did make me a bit fuller and more vascular and gage me a bit more "pop" to my muscles, but I didn't gain much lean dry muscle on it
answer the previous post with something that has zero relevance to the post and get the other poster to respond.
Well done, ya got me....
Now, hopefully someone else will learn from my error. ;)
-
So easily hitting reps in good form with 100s, after several sets of exercises before it, isn't good? ::)
-
So easily hitting reps in good form with 100s, after several sets of exercises before it, isn't good? ::)
what video were you watching? The man is a worthless hunk of pure shit-and you support him?
-
what video were you watching? The man is a worthless hunk of pure shit-and you support him?
I agree. Phildo is a worthless piece of shit that somehow became animated and lives and walks among men.
The Fugawee Tribe have a legend about a pile of crap (the original crap was black, fact!) that comes to life and spreads lies like backstage butt cheeks at the SchmOelympia. They call it "Turd Who Walks".
The story sounds kinda lilke a ghetto version of Frosty the Snowman except instead of a hat on his head some addict dropped a syringe in a pile of shit..."and he began to pose around..."
If there is a God, I hope he lets Phildo's dead wife haunt his bloated ass for the rest of his totally unnatural life.
-
Phil Heath will be Ronnie and Haneys record.
-
I think that Phil could get a ton of reps with that weight if he used his triceps more. But I think that he was purposely trying to not use is triceps. Phil was just using his pecs to move the weight (and his pecs were pre-exhausted)
This. Look at his form.