Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: chaos on May 23, 2018, 06:40:36 PM
-
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/23/trump-cant-block-twitter-followers-federal-judge-says.html
Now some crooked judge is saying Trump can't block people on his twitter....lmao. Who sues someone for being blocked on twitter? Fucking snowflakes. ::)
Opens the door for anyone to be sued for blocking someone. Bad precedence for sure.
-
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/23/trump-cant-block-twitter-followers-federal-judge-says.html
Now some crooked judge is saying Trump can't block people on his twitter....lmao. Who sues someone for being blocked on twitter? Fucking snowflakes. ::)
Opens the door for anyone to be sued for blocking someone. Bad precedence for sure.
Right? ::)
-
It's amazing that 1. It took a judge to point this out to him, and 2. You guys don't get it
-
It's amazing that 1. It took a judge to point this out to him, and 2. You guys don't get it
So you believe he doesn't have the right to block people from viewing his twitters?
-
So you believe he doesn't have the right to block people from viewing his twitters?
No I don't because of his position.
-
The social media platform, Buchwald said, is a "designated public forum"
This creates an interesting situation. And of course it creates many issues for any politician or public/government official or entity that has ever blocked or banned users or removed their comments on a "designated public forum" such as social media, maybe even did not approve any friendship/follow requests so that they could comment. Let's see if the case will proceed to higher courts.
-
No I don't because of his position.
So the first amendment doesn't apply to the President?
-
This creates an interesting situation. And of course it creates many issues for any politician or public/government official or entity that has ever blocked or banned users or removed their comments on a "designated public forum" such as social media, maybe even did not approve any friendship/follow requests so that they could comment. Let's see if the case will proceed to higher courts.
Exactly.
-
So the first amendment doesn't apply to the President?
Chaos, if I was the chief of police of a small city, I couldn't and wouldn't block people on my Twitter or Facebook. The President is in a much bigger role. He is representing the office..
-
Chaos, if I was the chief of police of a small city, I couldn't and wouldn't block people on my Twitter or Facebook. The President is in a much bigger role. He is representing the office..
That's you. See this is what demoncrats don't understand, just because you wouldn't do something, you think nobody should be able to do it. It sets a bad precedence in forcing any person in a public spotlight to end up in court unblocking people they've banned. If it can be enforced on the president, then it's on to congress, senate, mayors, movie and rock stars......all forced to be subjected to people they didn't want to deal with.
-
That's you. See this is what demoncrats don't understand, just because you wouldn't do something, you think nobody should be able to do it. It sets a bad precedence in forcing any person in a public spotlight to end up in court unblocking people they've banned. If it can be enforced on the president, then it's on to congress, senate, mayors, movie and rock stars......all forced to be subjected to people they didn't want to deal with.
It's not a democrat thing, I'm not democrat. It's a "whats right" thing.
-
It's not a democrat thing, I'm not democrat. It's a "whats right" thing.
"Right" to you, not right to me. I can see you don't believe in freedom.
-
So you believe he doesn't have the right to block people from viewing his twitters?
Trump is an elected public official who uses this twitter account as a public forum. It's not the same as if you or I wanted to block someone or some organization from our "private" accounts. It stinks that public figures have no privacy. But that was a choice they made when they took public office. Keep things in perspective. It will help you to not look foolish.
-
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/23/trump-cant-block-twitter-followers-federal-judge-says.html
Now some crooked judge is saying Trump can't block people on his twitter....lmao. Who sues someone for being blocked on twitter? Fucking snowflakes. ::)
Opens the door for anyone to be sued for blocking someone. Bad precedence for sure.
LOL
Trumptard
::)
-
"Right" to you, not right to me. I can see you don't believe in freedom.
Honestly, do you approve the folks you elect to serve in public office to be able to conduct what is essentially everyone's business secretly? Many folks already have concerns about conspiracies. Now, if you or I as private citizens were disallowed our right to censor who can post on our Facebook page or twitter account, that would be a problem. Furthermore, isn't the whole point of social media services like Twitter to provide everyone with a public forum. If you want private conversations with selected people use messenger, email, text or whatever makes you believe you are insulated from criticism.
-
So the first amendment doesn't apply to the President?
It absolutely does apply to the President as long as this isn't connected to the President's job. No one forced Trump to make a public political forum out of his twitter account. As much as some like folks see him as a comrade and as much as he likes to present himself as such, he really isn't. Making you think he is is just PR.
-
It absolutely does apply to the President as long as this isn't connected to the President's job. No one forced Trump to make a public political forum out of his twitter account. As much as some like folks see him as a comrade and as much as he likes to present himself as such, he really isn't. Making you think he is is just PR.
Do you realize that other politicians tweet just as much if not more than Trump?
-
"Right" to you, not right to me. I can see you don't believe in freedom.
I believe you don't have the right to shoot anyone you want. So yes. I don't believe in freedom. How about you up your game and IQ and try to meet me on a level that is reasonable? A fricken judge ruled in my favor. Give it up. You aren't being reasonable
-
Trump is an elected public official who uses this twitter account as a public forum. It's not the same as if you or I wanted to block someone or some organization from our "private" accounts. It stinks that public figures have no privacy. But that was a choice they made when they took public office. Keep things in perspective. It will help you to not look foolish.
this... can't be any more clearer unless you purposely ignore facts
-
Do you realize that other politicians tweet just as much if not more than Trump?
Your point? Court rulings are universal. What applies to Trump also applies to them.
-
Your point? Court rulings are universal. What applies to Trump also applies to them.
yeah but they don't like it.. I guess those other politicians aren't blocking people that don't kiss their ass, but that's neither hear nor there
-
I believe you don't have the right to shoot anyone you want. So yes. I don't believe in freedom. How about you up your game and IQ and try to meet me on a level that is reasonable? A fricken judge ruled in my favor. Give it up. You aren't being reasonable
A judge said so!! waaa!!! Doesn't mean he's right. As far as IQ goes you might want to spend some time looking within yourself since your ignorance is on the level of primemuscle, a guy that defends pedos.
Reasonable? Like when demoncrats organize a scream at the sky day because Trump is their president? Or when demoncrats need safe spaces from hurtful words? LOL @ one of the most unreasonable people (along with prime and straw) here telling me that I'm not reasonable. ;D ;D
-
A judge said so!! waaa!!! Doesn't mean he's right. As far as IQ goes you might want to spend some time looking within yourself since your ignorance is on the level of primemuscle, a guy that defends pedos.
Reasonable? Like when demoncrats organize a scream at the sky day because Trump is their president? Or when demoncrats need safe spaces from hurtful words? LOL @ one of the most unreasonable people (along with prime and straw) here telling me that I'm not reasonable. ;D ;D
Post a response worthy of comment and I will comment. I promise
-
Post a response worthy of comment and I will comment. I promise
Translated: I ain't got sheet y'all. ::) ::)
-
Translated: I ain't got sheet y'all. ::) ::)
you know better than that
-
LOL
Trumptard
::)
Another genius post
-
Translated: I ain't got sheet y'all. ::) ::)
When forced to think independently or support the indefensible, the conversation is over.
-
When forced to think independently or support the indefensible, the conversation is over.
I think that every time people choose to post a rolling eyes face, sarcastic answer, or declare how wonderfully intelligent everyone in their party and who thinks like them are, and how stupid those who don't agree with them are, while really not saying anything in regards to the conversation at hand.
-
Just saw this. Embarrassing for the actual suing and embarrassing for the judge.
-
I think that every time people choose to post a rolling eyes face, sarcastic answer, or declare how wonderfully intelligent everyone in their party and who thinks like them are, and how stupid those who don't agree with them are, while really not saying anything in regards to the conversation at hand.
And if you don’t declare “we are done here,” post some absurd hyperbolic garbage. Just so we’re clear, I'm talking about what you posted.
-
I think that every time people choose to post a rolling eyes face, sarcastic answer, or declare how wonderfully intelligent everyone in their party and who thinks like them are, and how stupid those who don't agree with them are, while really not saying anything in regards to the conversation at hand.
::)
Intelligence has little to do with right or wrong or even common sense for that matter.
-
A judge said so!! waaa!!! Doesn't mean he's right. As far as IQ goes you might want to spend some time looking within yourself since your ignorance is on the level of primemuscle, a guy that defends pedos.
Reasonable? Like when demoncrats organize a scream at the sky day because Trump is their president? Or when demoncrats need safe spaces from hurtful words? LOL @ one of the most unreasonable people (along with prime and straw) here telling me that I'm not reasonable. ;D ;D
Not only are you stupidly unreasonable, you suck as a moderator.
-
Not only are you stupidly unreasonable, you suck as a moderator.
You have openly defended pedos and perverts, fuck you.
-
Not only are you stupidly unreasonable, you suck as a moderator.
not a bad point
-
You have openly defended pedos and perverts, fuck you.
even so, you do suck as a moderator. No offense
-
even so, you do suck as a moderator. No offense
You suck as a cop, no offense. :)
-
You suck as a cop, no offense. :)
I resigned as a cop as in retired, why don't you do the same? You don't have what it takes to be a moderator. You have the label, but not the ethics. just my opinion,. But having said that, you get what you pay for, and I understand you don't make a dime pretending to be a moderator
-
I resigned as a cop as in retired, why don't you do the same? You don't have what it takes to be a moderator. You have the label, but not the ethics. just my opinion,. But having said that, you get what you pay for, and I understand you don't make a dime pretending to be a moderator
Did you resign because you realized you sucked or werr you forced to resign ???
-
Did you resign because you realized you sucked or werr you forced to resign ???
Probably an ethics violation so was forced to resign.
-
Waaa! I saw something I didn't like on the internet!!! Waaa! I'm telling. :'(
::)
-
Did you resign because you realized you sucked or werr you forced to resign ???
I retired because I had enough to retire, had accomplished what I wanted to, and it was no longer rewarding or interesting.
-
I retired because I had enough to retire, had accomplished what I wanted to, and it was no longer rewarding or interesting.
Locked up enough innocents to satisfy your quota? :D
-
this... can't be any more clearer unless you purposely ignore facts
Anyone that supports Trump clearly ignores facts. If they didn't ignore them, they wouldn't be able to support him.
-
You have openly defended pedos and perverts, fuck you.
Moderator fail.
-
Anyone that supports Trump clearly ignores facts. If they didn't ignore them, they wouldn't be able to support him.
Good chance that some Trump supporters drink the kool-aid.
-
Anyone that supports Trump clearly ignores facts. If they didn't ignore them, they wouldn't be able to support him.
Yeah. If you ignore the plummeting unemployment rate, increased labor participation rate, increased consumer confidence, tax cuts, bonuses, raises, increased home ownership, business commitment to bring jobs back home from overseas, stomping ISIS, etc. . . . there is clearly something wrong with you.
-
Yeah. If you ignore the plummeting unemployment rate, increased labor participation rate, increased consumer confidence, tax cuts, bonuses, raises, increased home ownership, business commitment to bring jobs back home from overseas, stomping ISIS, etc. . . . there is clearly something wrong with you.
But he says mean things!!! :'(
-
Locked up enough innocents to satisfy your quota? :D
Pretty stupid comment, even for you
-
Pretty stupid comment, even for you
I've tried to lower myself to your mental capabilities.
-
But he says mean things!!! :'(
-Inappropriate and crass things too. :(
-
Did you resign because you realized you sucked or werr you forced to resign ???
he probably didn't feel comfortable arresting minorities day in and day out
dey dindu nuffin
... and yet he has friends who wouldn't care if Trump dropped the "N Word"
-
-Inappropriate and crass things too. :(
Did he defend pedos and perverts? That would be inappropriate and crass.
-
Did he defend pedos and perverts? That would be inappropriate and crass.
Weirdest thing ever when you have someone pointing out how "inappropriate" Trump is yet for the longest time had no problem with pedos. Strange how hate can skew ones viewpoints.
-
Did he defend pedos and perverts? That would be inappropriate and crass.
Citing the opinion of experts is neither inappropriate or crass. Are you really this stupid?....guess so.
Did I? You seem to think so because you have nothing else to talk about but that.
Since you obviously suffer from a form of retardation, let me remind you that I merely cited some more educated people than I, who propose that pedophilia is a mental disorder. Like many mental diseases, there is no guaranteed cure.
Are you aware that it is easier to keep someone in a mental facility indefinitely than it is to keep them in prison? One would think your goal would be to keep pedophiles away from children and locked up for as long as possible. Presently, many violent pedophiles get a mere 5 to 20 year prison sentence.
In May, a Pulaski County judge imposed the one year, four months and 16 days remaining on a 1994 10-year sentence Dillow received for sexually abusing a child in Pulaski County. He initially served three years, three months of the sentence. However, probation violations in 1999, 2000, 2004 and 2013 resulted in Dillow having to serve the full 10 years.
After he serves all of his sentences, Pulaski County Commonwealth’s Attorney Mike Fleenor said Dillow will once again be subject to commitment. https://www.southwesttimes.com/2013/07/pedophile-receives-maximum-sentence/ (https://www.southwesttimes.com/2013/07/pedophile-receives-maximum-sentence/)
Failed moderator.
-
Weirdest thing ever when you have someone pointing out how "inappropriate" Trump is yet for the longest time had no problem with pedos. Strange how hate can skew ones viewpoints.
Your misinformed obsession with me is inappropriate. Get over it!
-
Your misinformed obsession with me is inappropriate. Get over it!
So what you are saying is that most of the board is "misinformed"? You might want to watch what you say in your blind hatred for Trump when your closet has already been opened for all to see. Trump appears to be a better man then you and I know that pains you greatly.
-
Citing the opinion of experts is neither inappropriate or crass. Are you really this stupid?....guess so.
Did I? You seem to think so because you have nothing else to talk about but that.
Since you obviously suffer from a form of retardation, let me remind you that I merely cited some more educated people than I, who propose that pedophilia is a mental disorder. Like many mental diseases, there is no guaranteed cure.
Are you aware that it is easier to keep someone in a mental facility indefinitely than it is to keep them in prison? One would think your goal would be to keep pedophiles away from children and locked up for as long as possible. Presently, many violent pedophiles get a mere 5 to 20 year prison sentence.
In May, a Pulaski County judge imposed the one year, four months and 16 days remaining on a 1994 10-year sentence Dillow received for sexually abusing a child in Pulaski County. He initially served three years, three months of the sentence. However, probation violations in 1999, 2000, 2004 and 2013 resulted in Dillow having to serve the full 10 years.
After he serves all of his sentences, Pulaski County Commonwealth’s Attorney Mike Fleenor said Dillow will once again be subject to commitment. https://www.southwesttimes.com/2013/07/pedophile-receives-maximum-sentence/ (https://www.southwesttimes.com/2013/07/pedophile-receives-maximum-sentence/)
Failed moderator.
Do I need to dig up your exact quote? Show everyone again your defense of pedos and perverts? So you can report it some more....reporting your own posts, lol.
-
Do I need to dig up your exact quote? Show everyone again your defense of pedos and perverts? So you can report it some more....reporting your own posts, lol.
Could you post them. Pretty serious allegation.
-
Could you post them. Pretty serious allegation.
I believe it started in this thread and went on to include other quotes from him in other threads.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=638091.msg8932410#msg8932410
-
Do I need to dig up your exact quote? Show everyone again your defense of pedos and perverts? So you can report it some more....reporting your own posts, lol.
I'll do it for you. I believe this is the post to which you refer:
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
I admit that I am not an expert on the subject of pedophilia, but the American Psychiatric Association is.
"Does the medical community consider pedophilia to be a mental disorder?
Yes. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has included pedophilia in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since 1968." Ray Blanchard, PhD https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1
(https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1)
-
I've tried to lower myself to your mental capabilities.
You started a thread about your man crushes twitter account. Are you a little girl?
-
I'll do it for you. I believe this is the post to which you refer:
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
I admit that I am not an expert on the subject of pedophilia, but the American Psychiatric Association is.
"Does the medical community consider pedophilia to be a mental disorder?
Yes. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has included pedophilia in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since 1968." Ray Blanchard, PhD https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1
(https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1)
You have to admit, that was a pretty stupid argument... right?
-
Could you post them. Pretty serious allegation.
Yes, they are.
Apparently, quite a few other board members "misinterpreted" the support of pedos.
Obviously, they were ALL "misinformed."
-
I believe it started in this thread and went on to include other quotes from him in other threads.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=638091.msg8932410#msg8932410
Hmm...
I "vaguely" remember this thread. ;D
Another Mod appears to have locked it. I wonder why.
Maybe so no other member could pull "a Howard?"
-
Hmm...
I "vaguely" remember this thread. ;D
Another Mod appears to have locked it. I wonder why.
Maybe so no other member could pull "a Howard?"
Hahaa "pull a Howard" ;D
Very strange how far some people will go to defend someone else because they "dislike" the same person.
-
I believe it started in this thread and went on to include other quotes from him in other threads.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=638091.msg8932410#msg8932410
Thanks.
-
I'll do it for you. I believe this is the post to which you refer:
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
I admit that I am not an expert on the subject of pedophilia, but the American Psychiatric Association is.
"Does the medical community consider pedophilia to be a mental disorder?
Yes. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has included pedophilia in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since 1968." Ray Blanchard, PhD https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1
(https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1)
Prime I don't know you or what you actually believe, but this does sound like you are defending pedophiles. If you're not a defender, you should clarify your comments. Just my two cents (and worth every penny).
-
BTW, I didn't say Prime was either of those things, I merely said he defends it.
Report that, weirdo. ::)
-
Hahaa "pull a Howard" ;D
Yeah, try real hard to fight the visual.
Perhaps given the focus of the last page and a half, I should have worded that a little differently.
Oh well... Such is hindsight.
-
Prime I don't know you or what you actually believe, but this does sound like you are defending pedophiles. If you're not a defender, you should clarify your comments. Just my two cents (and worth every penny).
He was called out on it continually (Montague gave him many chances to clarify) for awhile and I do believe he finally said something but took him forever so don't really believe it was all that genuine at that point.
-
He was called out on it continually (Montague gave him many chances to clarify) for awhile and I do believe he finally said something but took him forever so don't really believe it was all that genuine at that point.
Prime recently alluded to some child abuser/offender deserving some kind of punishment in another thread on the G&O. I forget the details, but I did (privately) question if he was being sincere, or simply trying to get me off his back.
Either way, I couldn't care less.
The point was proven.
Everyone knows what he's made of (regardless of Agnostic's "defense" - the only one), and there's no need for me to expend any more energy on it.
-
Prime recently alluded to some child abuser/offender deserving some kind of punishment in another thread on the G&O. I forget the details, but I did (privately) question if he was being sincere, or simply trying to get me off his back.
Either way, I couldn't care less.
The point was proven.
Everyone knows what he's made of (regardless of Agnostic's "defense" - the only one), and there's no need for me to expend any more energy on it.
Agnostics defense?
-
You have to admit, that was a pretty stupid argument... right?
It was a bit over the top, I'll admit that.
The point is that I wasn't defending pedophilia or pedophiles. Whatever it takes to protect society (children) from them, I'm up for....within reason. I don't believe in capital punishment. Killing is wrong whether it's sanctioned by law or not.
-
It was a bit over the top, I'll admit that.
The point is that I wasn't defending pedophilia or pedophiles. Whatever it takes to protect society (children) from them, I'm up for....within reason. I don't believe in capital punishment. Killing is wrong whether it's sanctioned by law or not.
Ok, so you were saying regardless of the act, you are against capital punishment. I don't agree but I can accept that many people share that opinion just as many people believe abortion under any circumstance is wrong. Me personally, I am on the other side of that spectrum... If a person is clearly a predator, has proven they can't be allowed into society because there is a good chance they will continue to prey on people, I say put them down. Too many people in this world as it is, why keep a known predator around. I also get that not everyone agrees with that. they have this feeling everyone deserves to live.... I have seen enough predators and the damage they cause up close and personal I would have no problem putting a child molester down. I would sleep well at night.
-
Ok, so you were saying regardless of the act, you are against capital punishment. I don't agree but I can accept that many people share that opinion just as many people believe abortion under any circumstance is wrong. Me personally, I am on the other side of that spectrum... If a person is clearly a predator, has proven they can't be allowed into society because there is a good chance they will continue to prey on people, I say put them down. Too many people in this world as it is, why keep a known predator around. I also get that not everyone agrees with that. they have this feeling everyone deserves to live.... I have seen enough predators and the damage they cause up close and personal I would have no problem putting a child molester down. I would sleep well at night.
Logically, I agree with you. Emotionally when considering their victims, I agree with you. Morally, I will never agree with capital punishment. As an example, had someone molested my kids when they were still kids and I saw that person crossing the street, I'd run them over. My late wife, who was Catholic felt the same way. A contemporary raped our daughter at a party when she was fifteen and he got away with it. One time my wife saw him while driving to the store. It took everything she had to keep her from running him down. The damage he did to our daughter emotionally still affects her more then 30 years later.
Any kind of child abuse is an abomination. Unfortunately, it happens all the time with parents intentionally starving their children, beating them, emotionally abusing them and so on.
The jury is still out on the issue of abortion. I try to understand the arguments from either side of it. Abortion is a tough one.
-
I'll do it for you. I believe this is the post to which you refer:
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
I admit that I am not an expert on the subject of pedophilia, but the American Psychiatric Association is.
"Does the medical community consider pedophilia to be a mental disorder?
Yes. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has included pedophilia in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since 1968." Ray Blanchard, PhD https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1
(https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1)
The fact that you can't see a difference between a pedophile and someone with depression or schizophrenia says more about you that any of your homosexual stories ever could.
-
The fact that you can't see a difference between a pedophile and someone with depression or schizophrenia says more about you that any of your homosexual stories ever could.
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness)." This not my opinion, but rather the opinion of the experts, I cited. Come on, you're smarted than this.
-
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness)." This not my opinion, but rather the opinion of the experts, I cited. Come on, you're smarted than this.
Trans is still a mental disorder. Homosexuality was until political pressure forced them to remove it.
What's your point?
-
Prime continues to dig himself deeper and deeper.
-
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness)." This not my opinion, but rather the opinion of the experts, I cited. Come on, you're smarted than this.
You have to be kidding if you're trying to lump pedophilia in the same category as things like depression. Pedophilia is evil, criminal conduct. Being depressed is not. I would hope you are smarter than this.
-
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
That right there's hard to defend, I don't care who you are - Larry The Cable Guy
-
I'll do it for you. I believe this is the post to which you refer:
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
I admit that I am not an expert on the subject of pedophilia, but the American Psychiatric Association is.
"Does the medical community consider pedophilia to be a mental disorder?
Yes. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has included pedophilia in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders since 1968." Ray Blanchard, PhD https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1
(https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/explaining-pedophilia#1)
Your original post - as a reply to me.
1119 Getbig Main Boards / General Topics / Re: The LGBT Agenda is Helping to Normalise Paedophilia on: 24-11-2017, 22:18:28
Quote from: illuminati on 24-11-2017, 22:07:05
Who the Fcuk cares Just kill the Perverts - Simple.
Don't know why, but I'm guessing you think and worry a lot about pedophiles. Are there things?
Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here.
[/qoute]
Getbig should have a Stop Reply’s From Suspected Peadophile’s & Their Supporters option.
Queers Faggotts Glory Hole Suckers = Mental illness
Loony leftists/ Peadophile’s & Supporters / L(except the Pam Anderson look alike ones)GBT
Get rid of the lot of them - all sicko’s & sick thinking.
End OF.
-
The fact that you can't see a difference between a pedophile and someone with depression or schizophrenia says more about you that any of your homosexual stories ever could.
You have to be kidding if you're trying to lump pedophilia in the same category as things like depression. Pedophilia is evil, criminal conduct. Being depressed is not. I would hope you are smarter than this.
This is exactly what prompted my criticisms.
That, and the fact that he refused to concede that pedophilia (HOWEVER it is classified) is wrong.
One of my original quotes from that thread:
Because pedophilia is the ONLY mental disorder with the primary MO of targeting and raping defenseless kids!!
Your hypothetical question/proposal of "killing everyone who is sick" is an entirely non-sequitur comparison.
Once again, you have completely ignored the context of a discussion in progress, following it up by citing completely OUT-OF-CONTEXT scenarios.
You are also the only one in this thread who has not denounced raping kids.
In your own words: "are there things?"
-
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness)." This not my opinion, but rather the opinion of the experts, I cited. Come on, you're smarted than this.
opinion of experts? experts of what? pedophilia?! Jesus, Prime.
-
This is exactly what prompted my criticisms.
That, and the fact that he refused to concede that pedophilia (HOWEVER it is classified) is wrong.
One of my original quotes from that thread:
"Pedophilia is classified as a mental disorder (a sickness). If this is true, why not kill everyone who has mental disorders. You could even take it a step further and kill everyone who is sick, whether mentally or physically. Who needs all these sick people? The world is overpopulated anyway, and this is one solution to that problem. Perhaps you're on to something here." Primemuscle
That right there's hard to defend, I don't care who you are - Larry The Cable Guy
The Suspectd Peadophile/Supporter/defender is Notably Avoiding Replying .
Great Even Agnostic is questioning what he says... that should send him a clear message.