Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Howard on October 11, 2018, 11:55:03 AM
-
I'm curious how some of you feel you'd do in a public debate.
-
Fuck off.
-
I'm curious how some of you feel you'd do in a public debate.
In all modesty, I think I'd do pretty well, but who knows.
I feel my public speaking ability would help me.
Some of you make some thoughtful, decent posts .
BUT, I'm not sure how that would translate in a live , public forum.
Overall, I think I'd do pretty well in public compared to this internet forum.
Maybe I'm wrong? Who'd you want to debate and on what topic?
Just curious.
The Internet is a public forum. If your live audience was peopled with Getbiggers, you'd likely get the same reaction as you do here; so would I.
-
I'm curious how some of you feel you'd do in a public debate.
In all modesty, I think I'd do pretty well, but who knows.
I feel my public speaking ability would help me.
Some of you make some thoughtful, decent posts .
BUT, I'm not sure how that would translate in a live , public forum.
Overall, I think I'd do pretty well in public compared to this internet forum.
Maybe I'm wrong?
Just curious.
Since you asked, you suck at debating. Your facts are typically incomplete, misleading, or just flat out false. You get butt hurt and threaten to leave. But never do. You repeatedly altered threads and deleted posts when you didn’t like what was being said. Your attempts at humor fail about 99 percent of the time.
Other than that I think you would do a fabulous job.
-
Since you asked, you suck at debating. Your facts are typically incomplete, misleading, or just flat out false. You get butt hurt and threaten to leave. But never do. You repeatedly altered threads and deleted posts when you didn’t like what was being said. Your attempts at humor fail about 99 percent of the time.
Other than that I think you would do a fabulous job.
Good points. However, I'm not sure how they apply to a live public debate (speech), which is what he was referring to.
-
Good points. However, I'm not sure how they apply to a live public debate (speech), which is what he was referring to.
Don’t see why it would be any different live?
-
Fuck off.
This is the only correct answer to anything this jamoke posts.
-
Don’t see why it would be any different live?
Maybe it wouldn't be. However, a live performance/debate employs a variety of different communication tools not readily used in written format. How many Getbiggers do you think are the same in person as they are posting here. How many posts do you believe are misinterpreted?
-
Maybe it wouldn't be. However, a live performance/debate employs a variety of different communication tools not readily used in written format. How many Getbiggers do you think are the same in person as they are posting here. How many posts do you believe are misinterpreted?
There's no way to know the answer to that, because you'd need to have met them all in person to certify the consistency between online behavior and real-life behavior.
That said, there's two kinds of people the Internet: People who are the same online as offline, and those who adopt a persona on the Internet that wouldn't be compatible with their real-life deportment. Generally speaking, most anonymous people fall in the latter category, while those who put their heads above the ground have less incentive to be fake or act differently.
That said, I'm one of those people who falls in the first group. I see no reason why the Internet requires switching gears. I'd call Vince Goodrum fat and ugly to his face. I'd tease you about your baldness and liberalism if I saw you in person. I'd stand by my political persuasions in any argument with anyone here. And so on.
-
Maybe it wouldn't be. However, a live performance/debate employs a variety of different communication tools not readily used in written format. How many Getbiggers do you think are the same in person as they are posting here. How many posts do you believe are misinterpreted?
There are a handful of knuckleheads who say very personal things on here that they would never say in person because they would get punched in the face. Keyboard warriors.
Still, someone who repeatedly mistates facts on here will likely do the same or worse in person/live. Think about it: anyone posting something has the benefit of Google but is either too lazy to check their facts or just dishonest. How much worse would they be in person?
I’m sure you’ve had a live discussion with someone who clearly didn’t know what they were talking about. Impossible to have a “debate” with someone like that.
-
Good post and I'm aware you feel confident about your own political knowledge.
I believe most posters would "freeze up" if they debated on stage in front of a crowd.
I'm not talking about some 1 on 1 ," to your face" debate. I'm talking about on stage , in front of a large audience.
I believe I'd "kick ass" in a live public debate , but who cares . Plus, it will NEVER happen for a variety of reasons.
The main reason is, nobody cares about watching me debate anyone LOL :D
In a related issue, I remember how the avg "stud" behaved when we'd go out to the clubs.
I never drank and would ask girls to dance all night.
If I liked her and got a good response I'd ask her out, or take her home.
Most guys , would be scared and act meek.
They'd lean by the bar , sit back and take all night checking out some girl.
It would take them a bunch of drinks before they had the balls to go up and even speak to her.
Most posters know , down deep , if they have the confidence and charisma to speak before a crowd.
They won't ever admit it, but we all know, if we have the balls to talk to any girl.
I'm no tough guy and I'm sure plenty of guys could kick my sorry, old ass.
I know many of you would do well, 1 on 1 debating in a room with a couple people.
I got shot down by more girls, then I laid. That's not what this is about.
It's about having the confidence to get on stage and speak your mind, in front of a large crowd.
Maybe I'm wrong , but I don't think so. ;)
No, you would suck in a live political debate for the reasons I stated. Unless your audience consisted of middle school kids. Or old people suffering from dementia.
-
would be like debating a Cuckolded Forest Gump with a shit fetish
-
All valid points, but I being live and in public is VERY different.
It's often said the most feared class in college is "public speaking".
Speaking your mind, 1 on 1 is very different from being on stage , on a live mic , in front of a crowd.
In my experience, most people "freeze up" and fail to project their views well.
In all modesty, I've done a lot of public speaking and excel at it.
I may not like Trump's politics but he's a highly EFFECTIVE public speaker.
He appeared quite confident and at ease in front of any large crowd.
There are all kinds of smart people on the issues.
Very few can project it on stage with effective charisma.
As a graduate of the Dale Carnegie's professional development courses, I recognize a lot of Trump's 'tricks' when speaking publicly. He's very animated. He'd be much more convincing if what he says wasn't a bunch of sheit and he wasn't so obviously bamboozling his audience. His mannerisms are completely predictable and corny.
-
As a graduate of the Dale Carnegie's professional development courses, I recognize a lot of Trump's 'tricks' when speaking publicly. He's very animated. He'd be much more convincing if what he says wasn't a bunch of sheit and he wasn't so obviously bamboozling his audience. His mannerisms are completely predictable and corny.
Sounds like you're describing Howard
-
The Internet is a public forum. If your live audience was peopled with Getbiggers, you'd likely get the same reaction as you do here; so would I.
How big do you reckon Howie's cock is? I'm inclined to say it's quite large. 9 wives really says something.
-
How big do you reckon Howie's cock is? I'm inclined to say it's quite large. 9 wives really says something.
He strikes me as the kind of husband who asks his wife to peg him with a strap-on, actually. Which makes a lot of sense since his prostate's the size of a small grapefruit and the only way he can get himself off due to persistent erectile dysfunction (ED). The avodart didn't work for his BPH, either, hence the coconut-sized prostate. I imagine his bed and general living area have that stench of old man smell coupled with musty jock itch and the aroma of stale lubricant and semen stuck to his inner leg, enough to overwhelm the olfactory of any unwitting passer by during his morning bagel run in jogging shorts (balls sagging out through pant leg and all) to the local deli.
-
Good post and I'm aware you feel confident about your own political knowledge.
I believe most posters would "freeze up" if they debated on stage in front of a crowd.
I'm not talking about some 1 on 1 ," to your face" debate. I'm talking about on stage , in front of a large audience.
I believe I'd "kick ass" in a live public debate , but who cares . Plus, it will NEVER happen for a variety of reasons.
The main reason is, nobody cares about watching me debate anyone LOL :D
In a related issue, I remember how the avg "stud" behaved when we'd go out to the clubs.
I never drank and would ask girls to dance all night.
If I liked her and got a good response I'd ask her out, or take her home.
Most guys , would be scared and act meek.
They'd lean by the bar , sit back and take all night checking out some girl.
It would take them a bunch of drinks before they had the balls to go up and even speak to her.
Most posters know , down deep , if they have the confidence and charisma to speak before a crowd.
They won't ever admit it, but we all know, if we have the balls to talk to any girl.
I'm no tough guy and I'm sure plenty of guys could kick my sorry, old ass.
I know many of you would do well, 1 on 1 debating in a room with a couple people.
I got shot down by more girls, then I laid. That's not what this is about.
It's about having the confidence to get on stage and speak your mind, in front of a large crowd.
Maybe I'm wrong , but I don't think so. ;)
Bullshits his way through 9th grade physical science class with a bunch of 14 year olds who don't know their asses from holes in the ground and all of the sudden thinks he's Abraham Lincoln vs. Stephen Douglas.
-
All valid points, but I being live and in public is VERY different.
It's often said the most feared class in college is "public speaking".
Speaking your mind, 1 on 1 is very different from being on stage , on a live mic , in front of a crowd.
In my experience, most people "freeze up" and fail to project their views well.
In all modesty, I've done a lot of public speaking and excel at it.
I may not like Trump's politics but he's a highly EFFECTIVE public speaker.
He appeared quite confident and at ease in front of any large crowd.
There are all kinds of smart people on the issues.
Very few can project it on stage with effective charisma.
They say those who list public speaking as their greatest fear, probably haven't really done a lot of scary things. :)
Odd OP topic...
-
He strikes me as the kind of husband who asks his wife to peg him with a strap-on, actually. Which makes a lot of sense since his prostate's the size of a small grapefruit and the only way he can get himself off due to persistent erectile dysfunction (ED). The avodart didn't work for his BPH, either, hence the coconut-sized prostate. I imagine his bed and general living area have that stench of old man smell coupled with musty jock itch and the aroma of stale lubricant and semen stuck to his inner leg, enough to overwhelm the olfactory of any unwitting passer by during his morning bagel run in jogging shorts (balls sagging out through pant leg and all) to the local deli.
We don't agree on much, but this is brilliant.
-
How big do you reckon Howie's cock is? I'm inclined to say it's quite large. 9 wives really says something.
Hmm, never gave this a thought. I guess it could swing both ways. ;D
-
He strikes me as the kind of husband who asks his wife to peg him with a strap-on, actually. Which makes a lot of sense since his prostate's the size of a small grapefruit and the only way he can get himself off due to persistent erectile dysfunction (ED). The avodart didn't work for his BPH, either, hence the coconut-sized prostate. I imagine his bed and general living area have that stench of old man smell coupled with musty jock itch and the aroma of stale lubricant and semen stuck to his inner leg, enough to overwhelm the olfactory of any unwitting passer by during his morning bagel run in jogging shorts (balls sagging out through pant leg and all) to the local deli.
You are oh so funny. ::)
-
We don't agree on much, but this is brilliant.
That you think this, says more about you than you probably meant to reveal. ;)
-
I'm curious how some of you feel you'd do in a public debate.
In all modesty, I think I'd do pretty well, but who knows.
I feel my public speaking ability would help me.
Some of you make some thoughtful, decent posts .
BUT, I'm not sure how that would translate in a live , public forum.
Overall, I think I'd do pretty well in public compared to this internet forum.
Maybe I'm wrong?
Just curious.
I can think of several on here who’d verbally tie you in knots
And or Make you look so bad / unable to answer
That you’d Threaten to Leave or Actually Leave only to
Comeback when it was all over.
Though it’s an interesting idea open public forum debates
I’d imagine there’d be a good few punch ups as it got heated
& people frustrated / shown up - there’d have to be a lot of
Security.
-
I'm curious how some of you feel you'd do in a public debate.
In all modesty, I think I'd do pretty well, but who knows.
I feel my public speaking ability would help me.
Some of you make some thoughtful, decent posts .
BUT, I'm not sure how that would translate in a live , public forum.
Overall, I think I'd do pretty well in public compared to this internet forum.
Maybe I'm wrong?
Just curious.
-
Since you asked, you suck at debating. Your facts are typically incomplete, misleading, or just flat out false. You get butt hurt and threaten to leave. But never do. You repeatedly altered threads and deleted posts when you didn’t like what was being said. Your attempts at humor fail about 99 percent of the time.
Other than that I think you would do a fabulous job.
Good points. However, I'm not sure how they apply to a live public debate (speech), which is what he was referring to.
Don’t see why it would be any different live?
Oh, it would be very different live:
Without the keyboard and screen, he would suck even more.
Maybe he'll get angry and flustered enough with the bashing he gets here to take another one of his "goodbye forever" hiatuses - the ones in which he dismisses, denies, pouts, sulks, and finally "swears" he will "never" return to a board.
Although a tired and predictable routine for him, those 6-10 week breaks are nice for the rest of us.
-
I will relate my politics at times...but I will not debate or argue.
Dealing with my mother (Borderline Personality Disorder...or Batshit Crazy) has given me a Lifetime Cumulative Dose of cortisol 10 times normal.
-
are you willing to die for your beliefs Howie?
-
Stage 1: The “dismissal” phase...
-
It's a moot point because a guy like me ( now) would never run for office.
At this point in life, I lack the desire or stamina to run for anything.
Using your example, I end up taking breaks from this goofy forum. :D
Aren't you a bit young to have lost stamina?
-
It was foolish of me to start off by making it about debating me :
1. Nobody cares or wants to see me debate anyone
2. I already knew most here don't like or respect me.
3. I just tweeked the thread title and removed "against me" to make it a more general political debate topic.
I'm not sure Getbig is the best place for folks to get respect and be liked. -At least not publicly.
-
I’ve always said on here, especially to liberals, take away google and get them away from the computer and bring them face to face in a debate, they would be completely lost.
-
I’ve always said on here, especially to liberals, take away google and get them away from the computer and bring them face to face in a debate, they would be completely lost.
I've got a much easier and quicker system that allows them to keep those online tools and barriers and still lose any argument or discussion instantly. You get an excess quantity of examples of it in this very forum, daily.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=648315.0 (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=648315.0)
-
I've got a much easier and quicker system that allows them to keep those online tools and barriers and still lose any argument or discussion instantly. You get an excess quantity of examples of it in this very forum, daily.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=648315.0 (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=648315.0)
How to win any argument against a liberal...according to Kwon3. this is an interesting piece where Kwon3 invents a conservative's questions and a liberal's responses. An alternate thread title would be, 'The world according to Kwon3'.
-
How to win any argument against a liberal...according to Kwon3. this is an interesting piece where Kwon3 invents a conservative's questions and a liberal's responses. An alternate thread title would be, 'The world according to Kwon3'.
Astute assessment. It's only through your unique insight that this breakthrough was possible.
No liberals posted in that thread, unsurprisingly.
-
Astute assessment. It's only through your unique insight that this breakthrough was possible.
No liberals posted in that thread, unsurprisingly.
You're welcome.
-
You're welcome.
Good to know you understand how sarcasm works.
-
A live debate versus a forum debate are 2 very difference things.
-
A live debate versus a forum debate are 2 very difference things.
Look who's back. The Legend. ;D
-
That you think this, says more about you than you probably meant to reveal. ;)
That may be true. Although I've never knowingly fucked a dude.
-
That may be true. Although I've never knowingly fucked a dude.
So...are you saying you unknowingly may have fucked a dude? Maybe your inhibitions were lax because of drugs or alcohol, but not so much that you couldn't get hard. ;)
-
So...are you saying you unknowingly may have fucked a dude? Maybe your inhibitions were lax because of drugs or alcohol, but not so much that you couldn't get hard. ;)
I don't really want to know for certain, but I'm pretty sure I may have been blown by a tranny back in the 90's.
-
I don't really want to know for certain, but I'm pretty sure I may have been blown by a tranny back in the 90's.
I wouldn't worry about it. All's good if it felt good. French diplomat, Bernard Boursicot supposedly believed his love interest was a woman. It happens.
-
LOL, good one Prime!
In all modesty, I've been asked to run for public office a few times in my life.
I briefly considered it, but knew I didn't want to do all the tedious work it takes to campaign.
I'd do fine on public speeches and working the crowd at an event, but thats it.
I have no desire to fund raise and do the tedious work required to campaign.
Politics aside, it takes a lot of desire and endurace to campaign for political office.
I wouldn't be willing to go thru the process. Plus, I'm honest enough to admit it.
I am an Oregon Labor Candidate School dropout. I quit for pretty much the same reasons you gave for not running for public office.
-
Of course, they think we're the clueless dumb fuks . ;)
Truest post you've ever made.
-
It was foolish of me to start off by making it about debating me :
1. Nobody cares or wants to see me debate anyone
2. I already knew most here don't like or respect me.
3. I just tweeked the thread title and removed "against me" to make it a more general political debate topic.
Started the childish "I don't like you" or "you don't like" comments. Manipulated the thread title. Predictable.
-
Started the childish "I don't like you" or "you don't like" comments. Manipulated the thread title. Predictable.
"Predictable?"
LMAO!!!
Right now, he's in the "dismissal" phase of pretending he's just acting goofy and that none of his comments or the criticisms he receives are serious.
Since you've called him out with factual accounts of his recent actions, he will next enter the "denial" phase, which is self-explanatory.
(ex: "I never changed the title. I never altered or deleted any posts. It must have been one of the mods.")
Soon, we will see the pouting phase in which he whines that everyone here is against him - even though he just said it doesn't matter.
Then, he'll swear he's never posting on Getbig again.
In four weeks, he'll return to Getbig, and claim he just meant he would never post on the poli-board again.
<1 week after that, he'll log in and have 40+ posts on the poli-board by lunch.
-
"Predictable?"
LMAO!!!
Right now, he's in the "dismissal" phase of pretending he's just acting goofy and that none of his comments or the criticisms he receives are serious.
Since you've called him out with factual accounts of his recent actions, he will next enter the "denial" phase, which is self-explanatory.
(ex: "I never changed the title. I never altered or deleted any posts. It must have been one of the mods.")
Soon, we will see the pouting phase in which he whines that everyone here is against him - even though he just said it doesn't matter.
Then, he'll swear he's never posting on Getbig again.
In four weeks, he'll return to Getbig, and claim he just meant he would never post on the poli-board again.
<1 week after that, he'll log in and have 40+ posts on the poli-board by lunch.
lol Truth.
-
Fair enough :D
That was pretty damn pithy and showed some clever wit. I softly chuckled as I read it.
I may come and go with the seasons, but I'm way past the point of taking this forum too personal.
Sometimes I glean a bit of insight mixed in with a lot of laughter .
Occasionally I wonder where all the anger and need to insult stem from.
Insecurity
-
Since coward and his "fan club" are so anti-anger and anti-insult, it will be interesting to see how quickly they denounce this rhetoric:
(https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5b2b77aa1a00002700ce2394.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale)
In the above quote, we have recommended abduction of, and violence against an innocent child, collaboration with pedophiles, name calling, and profanity... all while throwing up the peace sign.
-
Insecurity
Since coward and his "fan club" are so anti-anger and anti-insult, it will be interesting to see how quickly they denounce this rhetoric:
(https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5b2b77aa1a00002700ce2394.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale)
In the above quote, we have recommended abduction of, and violence against an innocent child, collaboration with pedophiles, name calling, and profanity... all while throwing up the peace sign.
Here's One for You /Straw / Howard / Agnostic
Whats his problem then - Insecurity ? ::) or He's Just a Horrible kunt of a Person & needs putting down.
Looking forward to your Answers
-
Since coward and his "fan club" are so anti-anger and anti-insult, it will be interesting to see how quickly they denounce this rhetoric:
(https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5b2b77aa1a00002700ce2394.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale)
In the above quote, we have recommended abduction of, and violence against an innocent child, collaboration with pedophiles, name calling, and profanity... all while throwing up the peace sign.
Just a deranged unhinged libatard who believes in rape,hate speech, violence, and being a pedophile is OK if done in the name of libatardism.
-
I'm curious how some of you feel you'd do in a public debate.
In all modesty, I think I'd do pretty well, but who knows.
I feel my public speaking ability would help me.
Some of you make some thoughtful, decent posts .
BUT, I'm not sure how that would translate in a live , public forum.
Overall, I think I'd do pretty well in public compared to this internet forum.
Maybe I'm wrong?
Just curious.
no problem
I would just do this
-
I notice that Trump doing cardio and applying proper tanning color wasn't on his list of 24 things he does well.
Just sayin' :o
didn't mention being faithful to his wife either or being honest
I don't recall hearing him say nobody knows honesty better than me or no one does honesty better than me.
.
-
I think we've all know plenty of tough men, who were straight talkers, 1 on 1.
BUT, from my experience , many of them dreaded the idea of speaking on stage , in front of a large crowd.
I'm sure many posters would be effective in an in person 1 on 1 debate , sitting at a table .
BUT, getting on stage ,in front of a crowd on the mic is VERY different. Politics aside, that's my main point.
Yeah, its definitely different. You are playing to the visual cues of a crowd in addition to trying to think in real time of an appropriate retort. They say public speaking is one of the most feared things for people. Speaking from years of experience the more you do it, the easier it is.
-
Since coward and his "fan club" are so anti-anger and anti-insult, it will be interesting to see how quickly they denounce this rhetoric: (JPG redacted)
In the above quote, we have recommended abduction of, and violence against an innocent child, collaboration with pedophiles, name calling, and profanity... all while throwing up the peace sign.
Peter Fonda doesn't speak for liberals any more than does James Woods speak for conservatives.
-
Peter Fonda doesn't speak for liberals any more than does James Woods speak for conservatives.
Please show me where I said he WAS "speaking for liberals."
Hint: I never said that.
I hope you're not paranoid.
I simply wanted to know what the "coward supporters" would say in response to this bullshit.
I suppose we'll have to rely on you since coward UNSURPRISINGLY never provided a serious, respectable response.
I just want to know if coward and his supporters will condemn comments from EVERYONE, or only "certain" people.
-
Here's One for You /Straw / Howard / Agnostic
Whats his problem then - Insecurity ? ::) or He's Just a Horrible kunt of a Person & needs putting down.
Looking forward to your Answers
I like and respect you, illuminati - but, I innocently "laugh" at you for expecting a serious reply from any of the above members.
You and I BOTH KNOW that there is NO excuse for Peter Fonda's message.
Unfortunately, not everyone is willing to concede this.
So, we must next ask: "If you don't denounce Fonda's sentiments, does that mean you CONDONE them?"
I don't expect to see denouncement of any kind from the above ilk. I predict that the most we WILL SEE is deflection and/or feigned ignorance.
coward has demonstrated both tactics.
They will say ANYTHING except that it's wrong... UNLESS it comes from a Trump-backer.
-
Throwing up a peace sign while saying cruel, hateful stuff, is like saying "with all due respect". :D
Hmm, epic deflection
-
I like and respect you, illuminati - but, I innocently "laugh" at you for expecting a serious reply from any of the above members.
You and I BOTH KNOW that there is NO excuse for Peter Fonda's message.
Unfortunately, not everyone is willing to concede this.
So, we must next ask: "If you don't denounce Fonda's sentiments, does that mean you CONDONE them?"
I don't expect to see denouncement of any kind from the above ilk. I predict that the most we WILL SEE is deflection and/or feigned ignorance.
coward has demonstrated both tactics.
They will say ANYTHING except that it's wrong... UNLESS it comes from a Trump-backer.
I wasn’t seriously expecting any of them to answer.
So yes rephrase my question to them & ask them
"If you don't denounce Fonda's sentiments, does that mean you CONDONE them?"
I doubt very much that will get any replies from them or if they do, as you said they’ll try deflection
At very least.
Let’s wait & see.
-
I wasn’t seriously expecting any of them to answer.
So yes rephrase my question to them & ask them
"If you don't denounce Fonda's sentiments, does that mean you CONDONE them?"
I doubt very much that will get any replies from them or if they do, as you said they’ll try deflection
At very least.
Let’s wait & see.
I concur, good Sir.
And, any responses we "may" get are highly unlikely to directly address the question because they know the answer, and are ashamed of the truth and, thus, themselves.
Rightfully so...
-
I wasn’t seriously expecting any of them to answer.
So yes rephrase my question to them & ask them
"If you don't denounce Fonda's sentiments, does that mean you CONDONE them?"
I doubt very much that will get any replies from them or if they do, as you said they’ll try deflection
At very least.
Let’s wait & see.
Just to be clear, I do not condone Fonda's statement in anyway.
-
Just to be clear, I do not condone Fonda's statement in anyway.
Okay - That’s Good.
Do you condemn it / what else do you have to say about it.
-
Here's One for You /Straw / Howard / Agnostic
Whats his problem then - Insecurity ? ::) or He's Just a Horrible kunt of a Person & needs putting down.
Looking forward to your Answers
I don't know Peter Fonda, don't know what his problem is.by this comment he seems disgusted/upset with what was going on at the southern border. I disagree with him. two wrongs don't make a right. He shouldn't have said this
-
I don't know Peter Fonda, don't know what his problem is.by this comment he seems disgusted/upset with what was going on at the southern border. I disagree with him. two wrongs don't make a right. He shouldn't have said this
It’s good to see yourself & Prime reply & not agree with what he said.
I’m just curious how or rather what you’d both be saying if it was said
About Killary & her child.
Both of you have been very restrained in your response.
Maybe that’s just me as I was expecting a harder condemnation.
He’s a fucking twat & deserves a damn good
Kicking & when he’s recovered to get another damn good kicking
& so on.
-
It’s good to see yourself & Prime reply & not agree with what he said.
I’m just curious how or rather what you’d both be saying if it was said
About Killary & her child.
Both of you have been very restrained in your response.
Maybe that’s just me as I was expecting a harder condemnation.
He’s a fucking twat & deserves a damn good
Kicking & when he’s recovered to get another damn good kicking
& so on.
I guess its not stronger because it was hypothetical. He is not the President or a person in a position of authority. He is an actor. He doesn't represent me, my profession or my country. If it was said about Hillary I would feel exactly the same.
-
It’s good to see yourself & Prime reply & not agree with what he said.
I’m just curious how or rather what you’d both be saying if it was said
About Killary & her child.
Both of you have been very restrained in your response.
Maybe that’s just me as I was expecting a harder condemnation.
He’s a fucking twat & deserves a damn good
Kicking & when he’s recovered to get another damn good kicking
& so on.
Sorry to disappoint you. I am restrained most of the time. It may not be the Getbig style, but it is my style. There is never a time when comments like Peter Fonda made are acceptable, no matter who's the target.
Whenever I've tested my stress level, it is almost non-existent.
-
Sorry to disappoint you. I am restrained most of the time. It may not be the Getbig style, but it is my style. There is never a time when comments like Peter Fonda made acceptable, no matter who's the target.
Whenever I've tested my stress level, it is almost non-existent.
Spoken like a truly stereotypical old white person that only cares about their personal belongings, only contributes to their own survival and leaves nothing of lasting value to the community.
-
Spoken like a truly stereotypical old white person that only cares about their personal belongings, only contributes to their own survival and leaves nothing of lasting value to the community.
Hard to care about anything else than what is behind that white picket fence in his private community
-
Hard to care about anything else than what is behind that white picket fence in his private community
And yet I still manage to care about a lot of things both inside and outside my community which, by the way, is not private. Even the likes of you could live in this community, if you only could afford it. ;)
-
Spoken like a truly stereotypical old white person that only cares about their personal belongings, only contributes to their own survival and leaves nothing of lasting value to the community.
You could be correct, but you are not, as usual. Even a week off from posting on Getbig can't help you. ;D
-
You could be correct, but you are not, as usual. Even a week off from posting on Getbig can't help you. ;D
Okay, Diogenes.
What've you done for anyone, ever besides be a character witness in your disabled military relatives' petitions for "more" than 100% disability, and become gay in old age (which I guess liberals would consider a plus in the column for social justice).
-
Okay, Diogenes.
What've you done for anyone, ever besides be a character witness in your disabled military relatives' petitions for "more" than 100% disability, and become gay in old age (which I guess liberals would consider a plus in the column for social justice).
Now you are bashing disabled veterans? Your ignorance of military disability is astounding. Your ongoing comments about my sexuality are irrelevant and stupid.
-
There is no doubt in my mind that I could do a better job of articulating my point of view than many of the current Republicans running for Senate seats.
They sputter and stutter, they cower away from tough questions. They are constantly on defense trying to make people like them and prove how not-racist they are.
When I listen to them talk, I question how well they even understand the topics they are discussing. You can tell when someone has a strong command of the issues and when they don't.
They are running against demonic fucking communists that want to raise taxes and import massive amounts of 3rd world morons that are going to head right to the welfare office.
It's as though Democrats are intentionally trying to collapse and destroy the United States.................. .and still the elections are close! Un-fucking-real. Republican incompetence Even when they win, they lose. Except Trump. MAGA
-
Now you are bashing disabled veterans?
Post examples of bashing, otherwise this is misinformation.
Your ignorance of military disability is astounding.
That's because I work for a living and never applied to disability, nor am in the military. If you took a clipboard and went to ask 50 people in the streets of Portland whether they know anything more about it than I do, I'd personally wire you $50, i.e. $1 per person who answered correctly on any questions related to it. In other words, this was an obvious ad hominem. There's people receiving government assistance who still work part-time. Shame you didn't instill those values in your adult children.
Your ongoing comments about my sexuality are irrelevant and stupid.
They're relevant since you posted a gay flag in one of your responses recently. What's stupid about it? On the Left, every argument against conservatives ends in the terminus of identity politics. Being homosexual is not only an identity-based movement but also a key demographic in the Dem voting base.
-
And yet I still manage to care about a lot of things both inside and outside my community which, by the way, is not private. Even the likes of you could live in this community, if you only could afford it. ;)
Poor me. :-[
-
Post examples of bashing, otherwise this is misinformation.
-Misinformation.
What was your point in your posting this? What've you done for anyone, ever besides be a character witness in your disabled military relatives' petitions for "more" than 100% disability....
That's because I work for a living and never applied to disability, nor am in the military. If you took a clipboard and went to ask 50 people in the streets of Portland whether they know anything more about it than I do, I'd personally wire you $50, i.e. $1 per person who answered correctly on any questions related to it. In other words, this was an obvious ad hominem. There's people receiving government assistance who still work part-time. Shame you didn't instill those values in your adult children.
Bravo, good to know you work for a living. Exactly when do you work? Looking at your user stats, it appears to post on Getbig 24 hours a day. Maybe you are on an extended vacation. If not, you must take an abundance of coffee breaks.
I'm surprised you'd use your ignorance as a excuse. It makes no difference what 50 other people know or don't know; they aren't posting facetious innuendos on Getbig. I agree many disabled people who are able to work part time do. Both my son and daughter have admirable values and have jobs. If my son-in-law was able to work, he would. He has great values too which his parents taught him.
They're relevant since you posted a gay flag in one of your responses recently. What's stupid about it? On the Left, every argument against conservatives ends in the terminus of identity politics. Being homosexual is not only an identity-based movement but also a key demographic in the Dem voting base.
It's not relevant, plus it is not accurate.
-
-Misinformation.
Elaborate.
What was your point in your posting this?
It was an honest question. You implied I do nothing for anyone, so I asked what the last good deed you did was? Besides helping your kids get disability, possibly more than they should've gotten.
Bravo, good to know you work for a living. Exactly when do you work? Looking at your user stats, it appears to post on Getbig 24 hours a day. Maybe you are on an extended vacation. If not, you must take an abundance of coffee breaks.
Schoolyard-childish reverse psychology has no place here. You know as well as I do that I don't post 8 hours a day, let alone 24. Your low blows belie your former street demonstrator bona fides. ::)
I'm surprised you'd use your ignorance as a excuse. It makes no difference what 50 other people know or don't know; they aren't posting facetious innuendos on Getbig. I agree many disabled people who are able to work part time do. Both my son and daughter have admirable values and have jobs. If my son-in-law was able to work, he would. He has great values too which his parents taught him.
how do you know? There seems to be a great deal of animosity for your controversial presence here. I don't see a similar crowd following me around or trashing what I say, or asking for me to be unbanned because they liked my posts. Think anyone here would go to bat for you like that? Nobody likes you, old man.
It's not relevant, plus it is not accurate.
So you're still in the closet outside getbig. Got it. Hypocrite. Larry Kramer would throw you out of one of his book readings at the local coffee shop in Greenwich Village.
-
Elaborate.
No.
It was an honest question. You implied I do nothing for anyone, so I asked what the last good deed you did was? Besides helping your kids get disability, possibly more than they should've gotten.
Honest - maybe. Misinformed - absolutely
Schoolyard-childish reverse psychology has no place here. You know as well as I do that I don't post 8 hours a day, let alone 24. Your low blows belie your former street demonstrator bona fides. ::)
Getbig is like a schoolyard sandbox. Juvenile behavior is the modus operandi around these parts. You dedication to Getbig is worth arguing about. What the heck are you are saying in the last sentence?
how do you know? There seems to be a great deal of animosity for your controversial presence here. I don't see a similar crowd following me around or trashing what I say, or asking for me to be unbanned because they liked my posts. Think anyone here would go to bat for you like that? Nobody likes you, old man.
Ouch! "Nobody loves me - everybody hates me - think I'll go eat worms...." The part I bolded does seem to fit the rest of the sentence.
So you're still in the closet outside getbig. Got it. Hypocrite. Larry Kramer would throw you out of one of his book readings at the local coffee shop in Greenwich Village.
-Never been in the closet. Never heard of Larry Kramer, so thanks for this. -Gonna buy his book now
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41iypN-UZCL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)
-
No.
Honest - maybe. Misinformed - absolutely
Getbig is like a schoolyard sandbox. Juvenile behavior is the modus operandi around these parts. You dedication to Getbig is worth arguing about. What the heck are you are saying in the last sentence?
Ouch! "Nobody loves me - everybody hates me - think I'll go eat worms...." The part I bolded does seem to fit the rest of the sentence.
-Never been in the closet. Never heard of Larry Kramer, so thanks for this. -Gonna buy his book now
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41iypN-UZCL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)
This entire reply just filler. It has the substance of cheese fondue and none of the salt or flavor. It's just fucking air in written text. Jesus Christ, I'm not even going to dignify those idiotic retorts other than to say Faǵǵots was a screenplay, one of Kramer's first books, and far from praising the gay community it illustrated the shallow, drug-fueled, and transactional nature of gay sex in 1970s new york city, before HIV. At the time he was boycotted by his 'friends' and by gays in general. He also founded ACT UP!. His best book in terms of success was The Normal Heart, which recent won an award (forgot which), and The American People, his multi-volume history of the U.S. seen through a gay revisionist treatment of history. I know more about your community than you do, lol. You're such a phony.
-
FAGGOTS ;D
-
Elaborate.
No.
That single reply is very funny coming from someone who babbles endless, non-sequitur dribble/filler.
Although, there was plenty of the latter that followed in the rest of the post.
-
This entire reply just filler. It has the substance of cheese fondue and none of the salt or flavor. It's just fucking air in written text. Jesus Christ, I'm not even going to dignify those idiotic retorts other than to say Faǵǵots was a screenplay, one of Kramer's first books, and far from praising the gay community it illustrated the shallow, drug-fueled, and transactional nature of gay sex in 1970s new york city, before HIV. At the time he was boycotted by his 'friends' and by gays in general. He also founded ACT UP!. His best book in terms of success was The Normal Heart, which recent won an award (forgot which), and The American People, his multi-volume history of the U.S. seen through a gay revisionist treatment of history. I know more about your community than you do, lol. You're such a phony.
It appears you do know more about this subject than me. I have heard of the 2014 film 'The Normal Heart' though.