Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Moontrane on January 16, 2019, 08:17:43 PM
-
The commander of a US submarine was relieved of his duty after he admitted to naval authorities
that he hired 10 prostitutes while docked in the Philippines, a Washington state newspaper reported
this week.
Capt. Travis Zettel blabbed to two other sailors at a hotel pool in the Philippines that he hired nearly
a dozen prostitutes on March 1, the Kitsap Sun reported, citing documents uncovered through a
Freedom of Information Act request.
Later that night, a sailor saw Zettel with 10 “provocatively dressed females outside the front door of the hotel.”
https://nypost.com/2019/01/16/us-sub-commander-relieved-of-duty-after-hiring-10-prostitutes/?utm_source=facebook_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site+buttons&utm_campaign=site+buttons&fbclid=IwAR3wf_nrRFwz20ji5g6Enppj_ovlfcH16Vx_L2JovxxtRkIytNcM4bajrno
Please understand: if I missed anyone, it’s been a big day…I’m a little tired.
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
-
give me the man a break - it it so stressful to be an officer on a US Sub
my good best child hood friend is an officer on a sub - he had to take all kinds of mental test to see if you will break since you are under water in a sub for weeks if not months.
-
::)
Now soldiers on leave or break can't hire prostitutes. This has to be an Onion joke article.
-
If he can handle 10 at once he deserves a promotion.
-
He did nothing wrong.
-
Ban men and their sexual urges! Animals!
-
I fucking hate morality police. Take away the hookers and he's probably out raping.
-
Ban men and their sexual urges! Animals!
Meanwhile, women should be more sexually liberated and pursue their own pleasure.
-
::)
Now soldiers on leave or break can't hire prostitutes. This has to be an Onion joke article.
I have been told by an Air Force officer that patronizing prostitutes and sexual promiscuity in general are grounds for having your clearances pulled...
Edit: As far as promiscuity goes, i could never have been trusted with anything...
-
Just another attempt by the liberal feminist agenda to remove men in power.
-
We want our killers to be moral apparently. ::)
More bullshit.
-
Just another attempt by the liberal feminist agenda to remove men in power.
The next commander of that sub will be a woman.
-
prime example of beta male Muhrican cuckold society to be LOL! ;D ;D
-
We want our killers to be moral apparently. ::)
More bullshit.
;D
-
The guy has himself to blame. No one else.
He likely knew what the possible consequences were.
Individual responsibility.
-
;D
We stick these guys in a tiny claustrophobic sub and send them out to blow up our enemies, to burn them to death, to sink their ships and drown them.
But they aren't allowed to bang some whores because that would be.....indecent. We do all this with a straight face and a sense of moral outrage. Humans.
-
So if he were a tranni or crossdresser it would be fine but because he paid for sex he is let go?
That definitely makes sense.
-
Meanwhile, women should be more sexually liberated and pursue their own pleasure.
is the sow on her right Eva Longoria?
So basically she's encouraging women to become whores
-
So if he were a tranni or crossdresser it would be fine but because he paid for sex he is let go?
That definitely makes sense.
I guess it depends what contract they sign and the rules they have to abide by.
Most companies (or military for that matter) put in their contract some “moral” code of behavior that the individual has to go by. If you sign it, the break the contract, the individual is in the wrong.
Whether or not someone agrees to what the contract says is besides the point. No one has to take any job or sign any contract.
Very broad:
Article 134: General Article. This article of the Uniform Code of Military Justice is a catch-all for offenses that are not spelled out elsewhere. It covers all conduct that could bring discredit upon the armed forces that are not capital offenses. It allows them to be brought to court-martial.
-
What exactly is the problem here?
-
What exactly is the problem here?
Only more powerful men in the executive and legislative branches of government are allowed to bang whores.
-
Wars are coming.
And one will be a total breakdown of relations between men and women. Heck, this war has already begun.
P.S. Joo Natalie Portman is yet another horrific princess.
-
Wars are coming.
And one will be a total breakdown of relations between men and women. Heck, this war has already begun.
Most certainly.
-
What race was this gentleman?
I need to know if he should be celebrated or vilified.
-
What race was this gentleman?
I need to know if he should be celebrated or vilified.
This brings up a good question. Do you identify and defend by gender or race first?
-
This brings up a good question. Do you identify and defend by gender or race first?
That is a good question.
I think I identify by gender.
-
What exactly is the problem here?
He started bragging about his ten pleasure ladies.....if he kept his unwise mouth shut everything would be fine....
-
What exactly is the problem here?
Blackmail/extortion risk...
-
I bet his main regret is that he didn't bang one more.
-
Trying to financially support 10 nice gals, feminist bitches should be happy about this...
-
The guy has himself to blame. No one else.
He likely knew what the possible consequences were.
Individual responsibility.
Yep, he signed up for and agreed to the terms. As much as you may or may not agree with morality/legality of either side of the issue he agreed to abide by those terms.