If an adult gets a 13 year old drunk or high and has sex with her is one thing. If a 13 year old invites a 22 year old to smoke pot at her place and they have consensual sex that's another thing. They are not morally equivalent.
No adult male should ever have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 18 in my book.
It's well known that I like the older ladies.(90 and up) That said, it's a man's responsibility to both obey the law, and avoid dicking down girls that aren't mentally and emotionally there anymore.
IMO, it boils down to being of reproductive age, to determine the abnormality of it. While 13 is young, it is puberty age.
i think this is the reasoning to blame for a lot of adults having sex with teens and pre-teens.
Pre-teens?
I think we should distinguish pederasty from sexual relations with people capable of reproducing, and this biologically programed to have sex.
^ pellius, someone took one of your posts way out of context. Maybe che? Not All Doggity. 🐕
Six months after the story I described above, I was 26, and ate the slit of a 19-year-old. I smoked marijuana with her, and watched Pulp Fiction.
Later, I questioned if I used her. In reality, she was a daily marijuana smoker. Meanwhile, it was my sixth time using it. If anything, she used me.
My only intention was to eat her slit. But she asked me to fuck her. Had it not been for the marijuana, I would have declined. STI fears. So...she sort of used me.
yes pre-teens, surely there's plenty of girls that hit puberty early and can reproduce before 13.
not that it matters, no normal person would think a 13 year old is "fair game" just because theyre physically ready.
Message to Al. I thought when we went at it on this subject it was more you trying to attack me. I see that you are sincere and not just gratuitously hopping on the band wagon against me. That puts things in a different perspective on my part.
You should rephrase the question. My point is that I don't feel they are morally equivalent. Both are wrong, one is worse than the other. There are gradations of evil.
If I'm at McD ordering my QP with cheese and the cashier gives me back $3 in change but one of those dollars was a ten dollar bill. If I keep it, that's stealing. If I bilk a senior out of there life savings that is also stealing. But it is far worse than the $10 I kept in extra change.
So to be fair and express what I meant by that statement, it should be asked are they morally equivalent. If it was your daughter and you found out someone got her drunk and had sex with her (remember those instances where guys would spike a women's drink so they could take advantage of her?) versus your daughter inviting someone to her room to smoke pot and then had sex with him. What would bother you more?
To me the first one is a pure victim. The man engaged and initiated predatory behavior. I try to be precise with my words. I didn't say "they" got drunk. I said "he got her drunk".
So you just wanted to use her to only "eat her slit".
Yes. ;D
Love that fresh scent of vagina.
I've always had strong STI fears, but yes - my goal was to only eat her slit.
Truth be told...most women do not feel used by me.
Quite the gentleman and scholar there Matty!
sounds like somebody disabled from the shoulders down would do.
I can get off on my own + STI fears.
Love the fresh scent of clit.
I hate when Matt says"slit" !! :(
No it's not morally equal. Clearly the one where you're getting her drunk or high and then taking advantage is worse. It's worse because she's under the influence. In the latter example she was the aggressor. What does that mean? You're still going to jail but you're going to jail longer in the first example.
The thing is , throughout these different threads, you keep saying "Well, this is what I actually meant, this is out of context, this, this and that" so the point of this thread was to remove as much bias and provide as much relevant context as possible. I don't think there's anything unfair or cherry picked about my opening post in this thread. It was an honest attempt to convey what you said and what I believe you meant, and I believe it did so accurately.
It's just a very odd line of thinking. You keep using the example of drinking/getting high and in this last post, you specifically use the example of spiking a drink. But the thing is, spiking a woman's drink is legally considered sexual assault regardless of age. It's wrong if a guy spikes a teenager's drink, but it's also wrong if he spikes a 30-year old woman's drink.
Fair enough...
So, would you also be comfortable saying that sending a guy to jail for the second example seemed excessive?
And I don't "keep" using the example of getting a woman drunk. I used it once for this example and if I did "keep" using it, so what? It doesn't invalidate the argument.
You state what I already stated that taking advantage of someone you got drunk is assault. You pose it in a manner like you are explaining it to me. Why? You're just saying what I already said.
^ pellius, someone took one of your posts way out of context. Maybe che? Not All Doggity. 🐕
Six months after the story I described above, I was 26, and ate the slit of a 19-year-old. I smoked marijuana with her, and watched Pulp Fiction.
Later, I questioned if I used her. In reality, she was a daily marijuana smoker. Meanwhile, it was my sixth time using it. If anything, she used me.
My only intention was to eat her slit. But she asked me to fuck her. Had it not been for the marijuana, I would have declined. STI fears. So...she sort of used me.
What does smoking marijuana have to do with anything? ???
just the usual ramblings of matt that doesnt add to the story
Indeed. Even "gash" or "hatchet wound" would be more pleasant to the ear/eye :).
Do you suppose Matt, Al, and Pellius all suffered under histrionic mothers?
Funny you mention gash...I don't like that term because it sounds like an injury.
Slit is more of a description.
Age is a human construct.
Is my logic on point here?
PS - isn't the rule for socially acceptable relationships "Half your age + 6 years"?
So at 38 later this year...19+6 = 25 is acceptable?
No adult male should ever have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 18 in my book.
Is my logic on point here?
PS - isn't the rule for socially acceptable relationships "Half your age + 6 years"?
So at 38 later this year...19+6 = 25 is acceptable?
They do say that eating disorders are exacerbated by mother/daughter relationship, so that might be one way to tell?? ???
Logic: no. Slit is a description. Gash is a description. Slit is not "more" of a description. Perhaps you meant that a gash is often a wound, whereas a slit is not; hence, slit is the "more accurate" description. Slits and gashes can both be bloody. They can both be wounds. A gash can be found in dirt, buildings, or clouds just as it can be found in human flesh. In a fairly abstract sense, gashes and slits can both be stretched to accommodate any sort of space between two like substances. At this level, all gashes can be slits, and all slit gashes. In common usage, a slit is narrower than a gash. But the amount of space between the edges of the gash or slit varies according to the subject. A slit in a whale might be a gash in a human, although both apertures measured the same. All I'm saying is, if you read this far, you owe me at least a little gratitude for indulging your autism.
I was thinking that autism is a rejection of feminine chaos, an overcompensation of orderly, rigid, analytical thinking to defend the poor child from the wanton and wicked whims of his wild mother. Faced with a choice between the austere, emotionless, uncompromising, logical father and the prevaricating, unpredictable, bacchantic mother, some children take sides with the money maker, leaving the home maker out to dry.
Autism definitely strives for rigid order.
I think it's more genetic than anything.
Keep in mind that I just barely qualify as autistic. It's a scale.
Level 1: Matt C [just on the cusp of normalcy and autism].
Level 2: Vegan Gains.
Level 3:Rain ManGenova.
It's also helping me that politics are moving in my direction now.
I felt like the kid who said "The Emperor Has No Clothes" until Trump got elected.
Human beings are clannish people. Autistics are more concerned with facts. And only now is it becoming more obvious to normal people that I was never wrong about divershitty.
Only 6% of Canadians want more immigration. There were 50 bombings in Sweden in the first 90 days of this year.
Good thing I was wrong about predicting all this.
Level 1: Matt C [just on the cusp of normalcy and autism].
Level 2: Vegan Gains.
Level 3: Jason Genova.
Level 4: Rain Man.
Autistics are more concerned with facts.
Autists are mentally disabled. They believe themselves to be so concerned with facts when in fact they are blind to the numerous facts that fall outside their unnaturally narrow point of view. It seems to them that ordinary people are stupid or unconcerned with facts, yet nothing could be more ironic. ordinary people simply see a wider spectrum of facts. This plenitude of knowledge invariably contains a contradiction to the autist's train of thought, which they consequently stop following almost immediately. The autist happily goes on pursuing his line of reasoning into a morass of "logic" while believing that his dissenters are intellectually incapable of following him. In fact, they have merely stopped where any reasonable person should and are happy to leave him on his one-way journey into idiocy.
I only deal with a few key issues:
- The gender wage gap is bullshit.
- Diversity isn't a "strength". It makes White-majority countries worse.
- Minimum wage doesn't help the poor.
And maybe like 3-5 other issues.
And I'm not wrong about any of those things.
No disagreement here, just spreading awareness.
I thought I was the only one, it's very cringe inducing. A most unsexy and vulgar way to refer to pussy. Maybe its a normal term in Canada?
How do you perceive gash, bad I assume?
slit
/slɪt/
noun
1.
a long, narrow cut or opening.
"make a slit in the stem under a bud"
synonyms: cut, incision, split, slash, gash, laceration; More
verb
1.
make a long, narrow cut in.
"give me the truth or I will slit your throat"
synonyms: cut, slash, split open, slice open, gash, lacerate, make an incision
Slit sound harsh and conjures up imagery of knives, murder and gaping wounds.
Age is a human construct.