This is some fucked up shit, right? I'm not imagining it?

[Matt]

Quite the gentleman and scholar there Matty!

Great post.

Normally, I will just eat a woman's slit, then politely tell her to leave.

[ratherbebig]

sounds like somebody disabled from the shoulders down would do.

[Matt]

sounds like somebody disabled from the shoulders down would do.

I can get off on my own + STI fears.

Love the fresh scent of clit.

[ratherbebig]

I can get off on my own + STI fears.

Love the fresh scent of clit.

get a woman to bottle the scent for you and you would never have to meet a female again.

[wes]

I hate when Matt says"slit" !!  

[Wiggs]

No it's not morally equal. Clearly the one where you're getting her drunk or high and then taking advantage is worse. It's worse because she's under the influence. In the latter example she was the aggressor. What does that mean?  You're still going to jail but you're going to jail longer in the first example.

[BB]

I hate when Matt says"slit" !!  

Indeed. Even "gash" or "hatchet wound" would be more pleasant to the ear/eye .

[Al Doggity]

No it's not morally equal. Clearly the one where you're getting her drunk or high and then taking advantage is worse. It's worse because she's under the influence. In the latter example she was the aggressor. What does that mean?  You're still going to jail but you're going to jail longer in the first example.

Fair enough...

So, would you also be comfortable saying that sending a guy to jail for the second example seemed excessive?

[pellius]

The thing is , throughout these different threads, you keep saying  "Well, this is what I actually meant, this is out of context, this, this and that" so the point of this thread was to remove as much bias and provide as much relevant context as possible.  I don't think there's anything unfair or cherry picked about my opening post in this thread. It was an honest attempt to convey what you said  and what I believe you meant, and I believe it did so accurately.

It's just a very odd line of thinking. You keep using the example of drinking/getting high and in this last post, you specifically use the example of spiking a drink. But the thing is,  spiking a woman's drink is legally considered sexual assault regardless of age.  It's wrong if a guy spikes a teenager's drink, but it's also wrong if he spikes a 30-year old woman's drink.

Jeeze Al, try to follow along. I never said there was anything wrong with your post. You keep reinterpreting what I said which why I have to constantly explain it. I said, clearly, that it's the way you posed the question in the poll. It does not convey the point I was trying to make regarding moral equivalence. That's the reason I have to keep explaining over and over again. People read into my words and interpret them to suit their agenda. Because I said a teen has the ability to consent, as they have throughout history routinely marrying in their mid teens, people read into that that I am promoting teen sex.

And I don't "keep" using the example of getting a woman drunk. I used it once for this example and if I did "keep" using it, so what? It doesn't invalidate the argument. Again, just reinterpreting to suit your agenda.

You state what I already stated that taking advantage of someone you got drunk is assault. You pose it in a manner like you are explaining it to me. Why? You're just saying what I already said.

My point is that it is worse than the second scenario which actually did happen. As I said, in this case the man initiated predatory behavior. If you think it is equivalent to a guy being invited to smoke pot by a girl
who provides a private room then we see things differently.

THIS DOES NOT MEAN IT'S RIGHT! BOTH ARE WRONG! I BELIEVE ONE IS WORSE THAN THE OTHER REGARDING THE MAN AND THE PUNISHMENT IMPOSED.

[Wiggs]

Fair enough...

So, would you also be comfortable saying that sending a guy to jail for the second example seemed excessive?

For 13 years old, you have to do some time.

[Al Doggity]

And I don't "keep" using the example of getting a woman drunk. I used it once for this example and if I did "keep" using it, so what? It doesn't invalidate the argument.

You state what I already stated that taking advantage of someone you got drunk is assault. You pose it in a manner like you are explaining it to me. Why? You're just saying what I already said.

Yes, you used the drunken example several times in the other thread in which most of the relevant posts have mysteriously been deleted.

As for the second part, not at all. Most people find sleeping with a child repellent enough, whereas you have said that you think that someone going to jail for sex with a 13 year old seems excessive. In your original posts, I didn't even take it as you saying  spiking/roofeeing/etc, I just took it as you meaning the adult was the aggressor. But when you say drugging, that's a completely separate crime that has nothing to do with age.  Most statutory rape cases likely don't involve drugging a child to the point of unconsciousness in order to take advantage of them. To tack that on as a presumed variant of a completely separate crime is disingenuous.

[cephissus]

^ pellius, someone took one of your posts way out of context. Maybe che? Not All Doggity. 🐕

Six months after the story I described above, I was 26, and ate the slit of a 19-year-old. I smoked marijuana with her, and watched Pulp Fiction.

Later, I questioned if I used her. In reality, she was a daily marijuana smoker. Meanwhile, it was my sixth time using it. If anything, she used me.

My only intention was to eat her slit. But she asked me to fuck her. Had it not been for the marijuana, I would have declined. STI fears. So...she sort of used me.

What does smoking marijuana have to do with anything?

[ratherbebig]

What does smoking marijuana have to do with anything?

just the usual ramblings of matt that doesnt add to the story

[cephissus]

just the usual ramblings of matt that doesnt add to the story

Do you suppose Matt, Al, and Pellius all suffered under histrionic mothers?

[Matt]

Indeed. Even "gash" or "hatchet wound" would be more pleasant to the ear/eye .

Funny you mention gash...I don't like that term because it sounds like an injury.

Slit is more of a description.

[Al Doggity]

Do you suppose Matt, Al, and Pellius all suffered under histrionic mothers?

They do say that eating disorders are exacerbated by mother/daughter relationship, so that might be one way to tell?? 

[El Diablo Blanco]

Age is a human construct.

[Matt]

Funny you mention gash...I don't like that term because it sounds like an injury.

Slit is more of a description.

Is my logic on point here?

PS - isn't the rule for socially acceptable relationships "Half your age + 6 years"?

So at 38 later this year...19+6 = 25 is acceptable?

[Twaddle]

Age is a human construct.

True.  So are laws. 

[AbrahamG]

Is my logic on point here?

PS - isn't the rule for socially acceptable relationships "Half your age + 6 years"?

So at 38 later this year...19+6 = 25 is acceptable?

When I turned 19, would that mean that 9.5 + 6 = 15.5 aka a fifteen and a half year old would be in play?  How would that hold up in a court of law?

[Slapper]

No adult male should ever have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 18 in my book.

^^^ This.

[cephissus]

Is my logic on point here?

PS - isn't the rule for socially acceptable relationships "Half your age + 6 years"?

So at 38 later this year...19+6 = 25 is acceptable?

Logic: no. Slit is a description. Gash is a description. Slit is not "more" of a description. Perhaps you meant that a gash is often a wound, whereas a slit is not; hence, slit is the "more accurate" description. Slits and gashes can both be bloody. They can both be wounds. A gash can be found in dirt, buildings, or clouds just as it can be found in human flesh. In a fairly abstract sense, gashes and slits can both be stretched to accommodate any sort of space between two like substances. At this level, all gashes can be slits, and all slit gashes. In common usage, a slit is narrower than a gash. But the amount of space between the edges of the gash or slit varies according to the subject. A slit in a whale might be a gash in a human, although both apertures measured the same. All I'm saying is, if you read this far, you owe me at least a little gratitude for indulging your autism.

[cephissus]

They do say that eating disorders are exacerbated by mother/daughter relationship, so that might be one way to tell?? 

I was thinking that autism is a rejection of feminine chaos, an overcompensation of orderly, rigid, analytical thinking to defend the poor child from the wanton and wicked whims of his wild mother. Faced with a choice between the austere, emotionless, uncompromising, logical father and the prevaricating, unpredictable, bacchantic mother, some children take sides with the money maker, leaving the home maker out to dry.

[Twaddle]

Hatchet wound!

[Matt]

Logic: no. Slit is a description. Gash is a description. Slit is not "more" of a description. Perhaps you meant that a gash is often a wound, whereas a slit is not; hence, slit is the "more accurate" description. Slits and gashes can both be bloody. They can both be wounds. A gash can be found in dirt, buildings, or clouds just as it can be found in human flesh. In a fairly abstract sense, gashes and slits can both be stretched to accommodate any sort of space between two like substances. At this level, all gashes can be slits, and all slit gashes. In common usage, a slit is narrower than a gash. But the amount of space between the edges of the gash or slit varies according to the subject. A slit in a whale might be a gash in a human, although both apertures measured the same. All I'm saying is, if you read this far, you owe me at least a little gratitude for indulging your autism.

Great post!

That was my line of thinking about a gash being a wound.

I think it's possible that people interpret gash the way that I interpret slit - as injurious or dirty.

I find that about 25-40% of women are self-conscious about how their vaginas smell.

I used to get annoyed when women would leave their tops on during sex. Now I realize they are self-conscious because I have always been in shape.

There was a movie with Bruce Campbell where he played an Elvis impersonator [2002?] where a woman [I think she was a nurse] changed her clothes in front of him [I think her shirt - exposing her bra], and he commented that she was as sexually intimidated by him as she was to a housecat.

Sort of the reverse of my experiences of women leaving their shirts on.

So I try to embrace it as a compliment, rather than be annoyed by it.

Although I think insecurities can serve as motivation to change...but I just see no reason to be self-conscious about certain things.

Although I'm not in shape like numerous other Getbiggers, I have no loose skin, or hair in weird places, or anything I worry about.

I do have hairy autistic ape feet though. And my dick - while a good size when erect - turns into a vagina during the cold winters we get here in Thunder Bay, Canada.

I showed a woman once, and she said "Where did it go?", and we both started laughing. I showed another woman, and she said "It takes lot of confidence for a man to do that."

I don't think it takes confidence if the women have seen my erect penis. Isn't that all that matters? Who gives a fuck if some transphobic piece of shit laughs at my penis when it turns into a vagina during our frigid winters here in Thunder Bay, Canada? You don't fuck women with a flaccid penis, so who cares?