Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Army of One on December 05, 2019, 02:39:34 PM

Title: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Army of One on December 05, 2019, 02:39:34 PM
?
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: BB on December 05, 2019, 02:45:15 PM
No, I rarely say this, but some sort of authority should step in. They are obviously thrusting their psychosis on to the child. 
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: robcguns on December 05, 2019, 02:46:01 PM
Simply,No it shouldn’t.The fact that the parents are bat shit crazy should not trickle down to the child at such a young age.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Skeletor on December 05, 2019, 02:46:21 PM
?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=658980.0;attach=781670;image)

NO.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: OneMoreRep on December 05, 2019, 02:54:05 PM
This is not good.

Children need guidance. Children are also curious and tend to try out things that aren't befitting of them. Parents need to direct their children's behaviors as best they can. If a child finds that their gender is not appropriate or congruent to their physical makeup, they can make the decision to go about a transition when older (i.e. an adult). The brain isn't fully developed at such a young age. Taste & preference change very often. To allow for a child to transition at such a young age is practically giving in to the knee-jerk reaction a kid might have during a hormonal fluctuation. What's next? A child decides that he wants to have sex with animals, do we also give in to bestiality, because they are free to do with their bodies as they please? Fuck that noise.

I am not a fan of this kind of thing.

"1"
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: che on December 05, 2019, 03:05:56 PM
Yes ,he/she  will be just fine


This bothers me more than  a little transgender child.



(https://cms.groupeditors.com/img/ghnw20170223-134424-905.jpg)


Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Tennisballz on December 05, 2019, 03:06:27 PM
I imagine the overwhelming majority don’t agree with this type of stuff.  We should be able to stop the insanity but for some reason the shit show just keeps going and going.  At this point, it seems like we need a full reset on humanity.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 05, 2019, 03:09:47 PM
No, no and no!  They are going to totally mess up the kids endocrine system, among other issues.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: OneMoreRep on December 05, 2019, 03:29:39 PM
At this point, it seems like we need a full reset on humanity.

I understand.

When a forest grows too wild a purging fire is inevitable and natural. Sometimes there needs to be a check against human corruption.

Cutting off the penises of young boys and injecting young girls with testosterone seems like an act of abomination.

"1"
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: 20inch calves on December 05, 2019, 03:32:41 PM
Absolutely not
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Titus Pullo on December 05, 2019, 04:00:27 PM
I also vote nay.  

A kid that age doesn't even understand their own genitals, at least beyond whether they have to stand or sit to take a piss.  All this talk of gay people and that LGBTXYZ shit is confusing enough for adults; to try and force that on kids is tantamount to child abuse imo.  

Sexuality need not be taught in schools until the kids are near or at puberty.  Before then, they are tabula rasas, blank slates -- not sure which end is up because they are simply not equipped with the mental and physical goods to process such things.  

If, as per their late teens, they decide they only get hard or wet for the same sex, then more power to 'em.  One of my nieces came out as bisexual, and I don't love her any less; if she's happy, I am.  But she made that determination when she was 18, iirc, not some little kid driven by her parents to a wonky understanding of the natural order of things :/
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Irongrip400 on December 05, 2019, 04:25:49 PM
No, not at all.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 05, 2019, 04:32:40 PM
?

There better be more to this story, like the kid was born intersex. Otherwise, get that kid away from his stupid misguided parents.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: hardgainerj on December 05, 2019, 04:35:10 PM
this is terrible
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: IRON CROSS on December 05, 2019, 04:56:38 PM
Yes ,he/she  will be just fine


This bothers me more than  a little transgender child.



(https://cms.groupeditors.com/img/ghnw20170223-134424-905.jpg)





Never ending BS propaganda , images of kiddis or black mother with 7 kids , but no fathers ..................

Let's stop BULLSHITING !.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: ESFitness on December 05, 2019, 05:23:58 PM
Why is this even a question?

A child under age 18 (or 16 in some redneck states where they fuck their sisters) is legally incapable of consenting to sex. A retard, an actual retarded person, no matter how old, is incapable of consenting to sex.

A person under age 21 is unable to legally drink alcohol or smoke weed because they're incapable of making informed decisions.

So how the fuck does a judge or anyone else, believe a child, barely older than a toddler, is capable of making an informed decision regarding whether they want to be a man or a woman?

There is no in-between. You can be a man who wishes he was a woman, but you're still a man.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 05, 2019, 05:30:36 PM
Why is this even a question?

A child under age 18 (or 16 in some redneck states where they fuck their sisters) is legally incapable of consenting to sex. A retard, an actual retarded person, no matter how old, is incapable of consenting to sex.

A person under age 21 is unable to legally drink alcohol or smoke weed because they're incapable of making informed decisions.

So how the fuck does a judge or anyone else, believe a child, barely older than a toddler, is capable of making an informed decision regarding whether they want to be a man or a woman?

There is no in-between. You can be a man who wishes he was a woman, but you're still a man.

Not only that, most 5 year old kids don't even pay attention to what their gender is unless some adult makes an issue of it.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: ESFitness on December 05, 2019, 05:34:50 PM
Liberals have fucked the US.

They want Cultural Appropriation legally forbidden. While Gender Appropriation is legally enforced.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Irongrip400 on December 05, 2019, 05:36:00 PM
Why is this even a question?

A child under age 18 (or 16 in some redneck states where they fuck their sisters) is legally incapable of consenting to sex. A retard, an actual retarded person, no matter how old, is incapable of consenting to sex.

A person under age 21 is unable to legally drink alcohol or smoke weed because they're incapable of making informed decisions.

So how the fuck does a judge or anyone else, believe a child, barely older than a toddler, is capable of making an informed decision regarding whether they want to be a man or a woman?

There is no in-between. You can be a man who wishes he was a woman, but you're still a man.

Fucking preach!
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 05, 2019, 05:36:56 PM
Liberals have fucked the US.

They want Cultural Appropriation legally forbidden. While Gender Appropriation is legally enforced.

Brilliant!  ::)
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: MAXX on December 05, 2019, 06:33:13 PM
This was the type of mental illness shit i expected when you allow homosexuals to have children.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: IronMagazine.com on December 05, 2019, 06:40:30 PM
?

No they are mentally ill.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Tapeworm on December 05, 2019, 09:36:36 PM
(https://bitznbitez.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/apocalypsenow_195pyxurz_small.jpg)

And there they all were, in a pile. A pile of... little peckers.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: OAK on December 05, 2019, 09:40:05 PM
Child is not 18....can’t consent.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 05, 2019, 10:11:32 PM
Why is this even a question?

A child under age 18 (or 16 in some redneck states where they fuck their sisters) is legally incapable of consenting to sex. A retard, an actual retarded person, no matter how old, is incapable of consenting to sex.

A person under age 21 is unable to legally drink alcohol or smoke weed because they're incapable of making informed decisions.

So how the fuck does a judge or anyone else, believe a child, barely older than a toddler, is capable of making an informed decision regarding whether they want to be a man or a woman?

There is no in-between. You can be a man who wishes he was a woman, but you're still a man.

and there lies the agenda behind all this, it is now aceptable for a child to choose its own gender, the next step is to allow a child to choose when to have sex

Pedophilia is behind this .. its hidden in plain sight...
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Griffith on December 05, 2019, 10:13:24 PM
Adults are free to do what they want.

Children are NOT.

Children do not understand these concepts, their brains aren't even fully developed yet. Also, young children are heavily influenced by their parents.

Obviously the parents were encouraging the child here. The child is incapable of making proper decisions.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Powerlift66 on December 06, 2019, 01:00:09 AM
Fucking dumb-retards. Answer to this one is pretty easy, Fukk-No.
Parents need to be extinguished...
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: rocket on December 06, 2019, 02:56:05 AM
Dressing and being known as the other sex, yes of course.  Plenty of time to change their mind.
Hormones, I don't think so.
Modifications, no.

Try to remember that these parents almost certainly do NOT enjoy the fact that their child is abnormal.  They didn't want this, it's their problem to deal with.  It doesn't go away if they say no to the kid.  It persists and festers.

Almost every single transgender person I've heard speak of their childhood describes it as hellish because of them having to live as their original gender.

And yeah, the child could be mistaken, but I don't see the harm if no physical changes (hormonal etc) are carried out.  The kid can change their mind.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 06, 2019, 10:27:46 AM
Dressing and being known as the other sex, yes of course.  Plenty of time to change their mind.
Hormones, I don't think so.
Modifications, no.

Try to remember that these parents almost certainly do NOT enjoy the fact that their child is abnormal.  They didn't want this, it's their problem to deal with.  It doesn't go away if they say no to the kid.  It persists and festers.

Almost every single transgender person I've heard speak of their childhood describes it as hellish because of them having to live as their original gender.

And yeah, the child could be mistaken, but I don't see the harm if no physical changes (hormonal etc) are carried out.  The kid can change their mind.

thats because they are the only ones to speak about it, dont you think many transgenders have a happy childhood so dont feel the need to cry about it.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Rascal full on December 06, 2019, 10:55:33 AM
Resounding NO but would like to read the article to see how these fucked up parents even dare to justify this to the world.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: IronMagazine.com on December 06, 2019, 11:02:40 AM
Not sure about this particular case, but human sex trafficking is a world wide multimillionaire $ industry including in the USA.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 06, 2019, 01:45:57 PM
This was the type of mental illness shit i expected when you allow homosexuals to have children.

Allow? Who's going to deny them their rights? You?  ::)
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 06, 2019, 02:13:57 PM
Allow? Who's going to deny them their rights? You?  ::)

God denies them the right, other people give them the right.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 06, 2019, 02:16:14 PM
God?

Well then, it would seem God doesn't mind because gay women still get pregnant and gay men still make that happen.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 06, 2019, 02:17:09 PM
Well then, it would seem God doesn't mind because gay women still get pregnant and gay men still make that happen.

you were talking about rights, I amended my post
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 06, 2019, 02:21:53 PM
you were talking about rights, I amended my post


'Because the bible tells me so'.  Don't believe everything you read.



2007
S&P Award
Winner
For the Bible Tells Me So
Directed by Daniel Karslake
An important and edifying documentary that can convince many to open their hearts and their minds to support gay and lesbian equality.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 06, 2019, 02:24:48 PM
'Because the bible tells me so'.  Don't believe everything you read.



you asked about who was going to deny them their rights, God clearly doesnt give the rights to gay couples having children, its biology you see.

So it leaves it to mankind to grant them the rights, in fact there are no such thing as inalienable rights, you dont have a right to anything, rights are what other people allow you to have...
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: rocket on December 06, 2019, 03:52:51 PM
you asked about who was going to deny them their rights, God clearly doesnt give the rights to gay couples having children, its biology you see.

It is also biology that gives rise to homosexuals and people who are mentally another sex.   Why can you get an orgasm stimulating the prostate?  Eh?  What was the point of that for a biologically limited heterosexual creation?

Careful what justification you use to build your house of cards with.  People like you often struggle with attempting to apply god to all situations and you end up sounding like utter fools doing it.  There is a moron in Australia who sees widespread forest fires and has realised that "god must be angry about summat".  I mean, they have arrested people who have lit fires and there is a massive risk of fire just based on the current climate situation - but nah, it was god ::)

In my mind, I respect your faith - but the moment you apply your completely unproven beliefs to dictate how others should live, you cross a line.

I think most people in this thread are not thinking that way - they aren't invoking the god stuff - they're just thinking about developmental issues as a result of possibility of an erroneous diagnosis (given that the child made it).  That I can again, respect.  That has a strong founding and is worthy speculation. 
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 06, 2019, 03:57:58 PM
It is also biology that gives rise to homosexuals and people who are mentally another sex.   Why can you get an orgasm stimulating the prostate?  Eh?  What was the point of that for a biologically limited heterosexual creation?

Careful what justification you use to build your house of cards with.  People like you often struggle with attempting to apply god to all situations and you end up sounding like utter fools doing it.  There is a moron in Australia who sees widespread forest fires and has realised that "god must be angry about summat".  I mean, they have arrested people who have lit fires and there is a massive risk of fire just based on the current climate situation - but nah, it was god ::)

In my mind, I respect your faith - but the moment you apply your completely unproven beliefs to dictate how others should live, you cross a line.

I think most people in this thread are not thinking that way - they aren't invoking the god stuff - they're just thinking about developmental issues as a result of possibility of an erroneous diagnosis (given that the child made it).  That I can again, respect.  That has a strong founding and is worthy speculation.  


I dont believe in God, I beleive in biology it takes a male and female to produce a child...thats why a homosexual couple are not able to have them,

I was more undoing an argument about "rights"
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: rocket on December 06, 2019, 04:06:01 PM
I dont believe in God, I beleive in biology it takes a male and female to produce a child...thats why a homosexual couple are not able to have them,

I was more undoing an argument about "rights"

The production of a child is separate to the raising of one.  It isn't an argument that works.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: joswift on December 06, 2019, 04:11:28 PM
The production of a child is separate to the raising of one.  It isn't an argument that works.
Lions dont raise another lions kids...
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Desolate on December 06, 2019, 04:24:13 PM
This was the type of mental illness shit i expected when you allow homosexuals to have children.

Exactly.

We reap what we sow.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Primemuscle on December 06, 2019, 04:30:16 PM
Exactly.

We reap what we sow.

Heavy.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Moontrane on December 06, 2019, 04:38:46 PM
This sad phenomenon seems to be mostly limited to America, Canada, and the U.K. - so far.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Marvin Martian on December 07, 2019, 08:11:33 AM
Why is this even a question?

A child under age 18 (or 16 in some redneck states where they fuck their sisters) is legally incapable of consenting to sex. A retard, an actual retarded person, no matter how old, is incapable of consenting to sex.

A person under age 21 is unable to legally drink alcohol or smoke weed because they're incapable of making informed decisions.

So how the fuck does a judge or anyone else, believe a child, barely older than a toddler, is capable of making an informed decision regarding whether they want to be a man or a woman?

There is no in-between. You can be a man who wishes he was a woman, but you're still a man.


Holy shit - I find myself totally agreeing with you here man. Other than the 21 year old drinking. When I was in the Corps 18 was the drinking age in most states but some had changed to 21. I found it absolutely insane that I was entrusted to lead Marines with weapons of destruction into battle and every Marine was trusted to make decisions of life and death - but couldn’t have a fckn cold beer??? That’s just illogical.

But to the point of 18 and under being unable to make long term life decision I totally agree. The frontal lobe isn’t developed until even older. Guys that are turned on by the “sexy school girl” make me sick. Been in more than a few scraps over that in fact.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: MAXX on December 07, 2019, 09:01:53 PM
Allow? Who's going to deny them their rights? You?  ::)
We don't allow pedos to be around children do we? Same thing.
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: Sharma on December 08, 2019, 01:57:03 PM
This is just so disgusting and wrong to normal - and even quite weird - people that you almost feel it’s a joke. These two repellent, obese and probably on social security, monstrosities shouldn’t even be allowed to raise a child let alone foist their mental illness onto the poor child.

Then people act surprised when right wing government start getting elected - you leave them no choice .
Title: Re: Should this be allowed?
Post by: deadz on December 08, 2019, 03:47:40 PM
👎