Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: hardgainerj on December 16, 2019, 09:35:40 AM
-
(http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1576447454747.png)
say something nice
-
Does India have a superhero?
-
(http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1576447454747.png)
say something nice
Any place that worships cows is no threat
-
and a place that licks trump's ass is?
-
and a place that licks trump's ass is?
No, I mean what answer are you looking for whether trump was prez or not it would make no difference
-
Does India have a superhero?
this is the closest they ever came to one.
-
Nope, India import minerals so :-\
-
this is the closest they ever came to one.
interesting, the indian 'comic' hari kondabolu that complained about apu looks like a simpson character himself
-
Nope, India import minerals so :-\
and exports disposable IT
-
(http://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1576447454747.png)
say something nice
The image is correct.
They wipe their ass with their left and eats with their right if i remember correctly.
-
Gross country and society...
-
and a place that licks trump's ass is?
No but a country that is thriving is. Even when dumb anti-American girls like yourself do what they can to upend it.
-
and a place that licks trump's ass is?
Looney left kuntzz...
-
The USA was fine when it was 90% White. Better than fine. It controlled 25% of the world's economic resources and could have taken down the entire planet with a few clicks of a button in the span of an afternoon.
Still can.
But naturally, importing third world people = third world outcomes. Multiculturalism isn't failing - it's doing exactly what Jews want it to do to Caucasians. Jews learned after WWII that Caucasians are NOT to be taken on via warfare. So they're using psychological and subversive techniques to direct natural selection against Caucasians that will see us disappear as a distinct people by no later than 2150.
You may not understand this now.
Trust me, by 2050, when Whites are 40% of Canada's population, you'll "get it".
And it doesn't exactly take a genius to connect the dots and figure out who owns the media and the banks. The investment banks - not the commercial ones.
Either way.
Just wait and see for yourself.
Also - and as has been said on here before, and recently - we should have picked our own cotton.
-
Plus they know that most are brain dead, "cult following" lemmings, who do what they say. (MSM, Gov't, etc).
So they will be guided into a weaker society, easy to control. Now they control them by the devices they carry, and brain wash them via their phones.
(Twatter, Kuntbook, etc). Pushing the lib-agenda, anti-conservative rhetoric. (They don't want strong white men standing up to them).
When African americans rap about killing cops, and BLM and pro-black stuff, they call it 'culture proud and entertainment'.
When white-power stuff is talked about, or their music, its racist and hateful. Only the brain-dead would even agree w/ that, cant have one, and not the other.
It must be a 2-way street. Libtard leaders only know of t heir 1-way street.
-
"India's big problem: 200 million angry Muslims (Full show)
Rick Sanchez talks to NRS Special Correspondent Michele Greenstein about the explosive protests in India, its economic backdrop, and the rise of Hindu nationalism."
RT America
-
Does India have a superhero?
India probably had the original superheroes.
The gods that aren't animals are basically superheroes
All the shooting thunderbolts (thor), magic third eye (dr strange), changing size (antman) basically any superpower you've heard of probably has an Indian god version which predates any western version.
-
1/2 the country doesn’t even have flush toilets ...... and you tell me they will be a super power soon?
-
1/2 the country doesn’t even have flush toilets ...... and you tell me they will be a super power soon?
Countries become superpowers through exploitation. The British exploited their colonises, the US exploited their slaves and more recently the Chinese exploited their own people.
India has 100s of millions of people who are dirt poor and dumb as fuck and that gives them a huge pool of people to exploit.
-
Countries become superpowers through exploitation. The British exploited their colonises, the US exploited their slaves and more recently the Chinese exploited their own people.
India has 100s of millions of people who are dirt poor and dumb as fuck and that gives them a huge pool of people to exploit.
You think the wealth in the US was created during and because of slavery? Well that's total bullshit.
-
I've seen a few Indian women I'd like to exploit. I used to go to a curry place and I don't know if all these girls were the owner's daughters or he only hired stunners or what but all of these young ladies were Kwon approved.
Lots of guys seem to catch Yellow Fever but Indian is my ethnic fetish. Cumming soontra.
-
I've seen a few Indian women I'd like to exploit. I used to go to a curry place and I don't know if all these girls were the owner's daughters or he only hired stunners or what but all of these young ladies were Kwon approved.
Lots of guys seem to catch Yellow Fever but Indian is my ethnic fetish. Cumming soontra.
Epic booties? Pics or it didn't happen! :D
-
Booties and titays on an hourglass, bro. Faces that promised evenings of lustful abandon and scrambled eggs the following morning. Hazel angels. May Shiva strike me down if this is anything but the whole and factual truth, so help me Vishnu.
-
You think the wealth in the US was created during and because of slavery? Well that's total bullshit.
A freed slave and their descendants are ripe for exploitation. Without slavery there isn't that resource.
-
(https://66.media.tumblr.com/87c904bd4141d514781ded300afc9fc0/tumblr_olf78jkydQ1vck6qmo4_1280.jpg)
-
A freed slave and their descendants are ripe for exploitation. Without slavery there isn't that resource.
I've never exploited a black woman.
-
A freed slave and their descendants are ripe for exploitation. Without slavery there isn't that resource.
You still have provided no proof that the wealth of the US was created by slaves let alone freed slaves and their descendants. It's a terrible argument that's devoid of any kind of facts.
-
You still have provided no proof that the wealth of the US was created by slaves let alone freed slaves and their descendants. It's a terrible argument that's devoid of any kind of facts.
Hey moron go show me where I said "the wealth in the US was created during and because of slavery". Oh wait I didn't.
Idiot
-
Hey moron go show me where I said "the wealth in the US was created during and because of slavery". Oh wait I didn't.
Idiot
What point are you trying to prove? I asked you that direct question. The US is a superpower because of slavery? How fucking stupid are you? Yes, the US became a superpower because they exploited 10% of the population. Genius point. It wasn't because the US is an extremely resource rich country or the fact that we didn't have to fight two world wars geographically in our country or because millions of white Europeans flocked here in the late 1800's early 1900's and built the manufacturing powerhouse that was the US. No, it was slavery. What a scholar you are.
-
What point are you trying to prove? I asked you that direct question. The US is a superpower because of slavery? How fucking stupid are you? Yes, the US became a superpower because they exploited 10% of the population. Genius point. It wasn't because the US is an extremely resource rich country or the fact that we didn't have to fight two world wars geographically in our country or because millions of white Europeans flocked here in the late 1800's early 1900's and built the manufacturing powerhouse that was the US. No, it was slavery. What a scholar you are.
I'll play nice and explain my statement to you in a cordial way.
I said exploitation was the key to becoming a superpower and then I gave examples of bottom dwellers in a society who were exploited. The reason I gave those examples was because someone mentioned the street shitters in India. My point was if India can exploit this "useless" portion of the population, just like other super powers found a way with theirs then it's possible for it to become a super power too.
Now pay attention.
You mention the action of making use of and benefiting from resources, well that is the very definition of exploitation! But I wasn't replying to a post about natural resources and that's why I didn't give any examples of it.
Now be a good boy and stop being a dense fuck that's fixated on Slavery.
-
Shithole country and repellent culture.
-
I'll play nice and explain my statement to you in a cordial way.
I said exploitation was the key to becoming a superpower and then I gave examples of bottom dwellers in a society who were exploited. The reason I gave those examples was because someone mentioned the street shitters in India. My point was if India can exploit this "useless" portion of the population, just like other super powers found a way with theirs then it's possible for it to become a super power too.
Now pay attention.
You mention the action of making use of and benefiting from resources, well that is the very definition of exploitation! But I wasn't replying to a post about natural resources and that's why I didn't give any examples of it.
Now be a good boy and stop being a dense fuck that's fixated on Slavery.
LOL. Nothing like a condescending person that doesn't understand the difference between a fact and an opinion. You asserted the US became a superpower from exploiting their slaves. Totally historically inaccurate. I talked about natural resources because that was paramount to the US becoming a superpower. Exploiting slaves was not. If you wanna talk about exploiting people, you might want to look at the factory workers during the Industrial Revolution and see what they looked like. Here's a hint, they weren't African slaves.
-
America is a super power because of Europeans that built this country. When ever you import third world people into a country who rely on free stuff paid for by the tax payers things start going south when they can vote.
-
LOL. Nothing like a condescending person that doesn't understand the difference between a fact and an opinion. You asserted the US became a superpower from exploiting their slaves. Totally historically inaccurate. I talked about natural resources because that was paramount to the US becoming a superpower. Exploiting slaves was not. If you wanna talk about exploiting people, you might want to look at the factory workers during the Industrial Revolution and see what they looked like. Here's a hint, they weren't African slaves.
So even when it's broken down and explained to you, you continue to try argue a point I didn't make by applying your own spin to it.
I was right the first time. You are a MORON.
-
So even when it's broken down and explained to you, you continue to try argue a point I didn't make by applying your own spin to it.
I was right the first time. You are a MORON.
You didn't explain anything. You just restated your factually and historically inaccurate opinion. Slavery was an important part of the southern, antebellum economy, but was not a major part of the US becoming a superpower.
-
(https://66.media.tumblr.com/87c904bd4141d514781ded300afc9fc0/tumblr_olf78jkydQ1vck6qmo4_1280.jpg)
You are an excellent human being Kwon. I admire your work!
-
You are an excellent human being Kwon. I admire your work!
Loved you back in the 80s!
-
;D
-
You didn't explain anything. You just restated your factually and historically inaccurate opinion. Slavery was an important part of the southern, antebellum economy, but was not a major part of the US becoming a superpower.
Pay close attention bellend
Slaves were the bottom dwellers in society just as street shitters in India are right now. Guess what the Brits did with their bottom dwellers. They sent them to colonies!
If India work out how to make use of (exploit) their vast number of bottom dwellers then they will be on their way to superpower status and given the vast numbers it will happen fast.
Just to help you with your slavery fixation I'll break things down even further for you. Here are my exact words "the US exploited their slaves". Replace the word slave with poor and it reads the same. "the US exploited their poor". The poor weren't the bottom dwellers at the time though, it was the slaves.
Note I did not say "the US exploited slavery" which is what your whole fictitious argument seems to be about.
-
(https://66.media.tumblr.com/87c904bd4141d514781ded300afc9fc0/tumblr_olf78jkydQ1vck6qmo4_1280.jpg)
👍
-
Northern Indians dislike much darker South Indians.
-
Northern Indians dislike much darker South Indians.
Yes, and the caste system is alive and well even though illegal.
-
Yes, and the caste system is alive and well even though illegal.
Several Northern's told me that , they laugh at Ghandi's BS ................
-
No but a country that is thriving is. Even when dumb anti-American girls like yourself do what they can to upend it.
you're a moron...America 50 years ago was and is the only society in history that was a true democracy. Now it's brain-washed wannabe Christian bible belt.
Americans! Wake up !
-
you're a moron...America 50 years ago was and is the only society in history that was a true democracy. Now it's brain-washed wannabe Christian bible belt.
Americans! Wake up !
Bible belt is on Route 66 ;)
-
-
-
Pay close attention bellend
Slaves were the bottom dwellers in society just as street shitters in India are right now. Guess what the Brits did with their bottom dwellers. They sent them to colonies!
If India work out how to make use of (exploit) their vast number of bottom dwellers then they will be on their way to superpower status and given the vast numbers it will happen fast.
Just to help you with your slavery fixation I'll break things down even further for you. Here are my exact words "the US exploited their slaves". Replace the word slave with poor and it reads the same. "the US exploited their poor". The poor weren't the bottom dwellers at the time though, it was the slaves.
Note I did not say "the US exploited slavery" which is what your whole fictitious argument seems to be about.
You really need to learn history. Brits did not send their bottom dwellers to the colonies. That's a pretty broad and inaccurate statement. The British Empire viewed the American colonies as an extremely important region economically, militarily, etc. If you think they sent all the dregs over here, you are totally wrong. Some prisoners were sent here, but it was around 10% or so of all the people that emigrated here before 1776. You seem to have a historically inaccurate theory that to become a superpower, all a country has to do is exploit the "bottom dwellers" in that country. That was definitely not true in America. You said, "Countries become superpowers through exploitation. The British exploited their colonises, the US exploited their slaves" Completely wrong. Why wasn't the US a superpower in 1860 when slavery was at it's peak? Why are the last states who had slaves in this country the poorest? Shouldn't they be the richest since they exploited the most people? You might seem like a smart guy when you're hanging out with your friends, who are probably all dumb as fuck, but you have a depthless view of history.
-
You really need to learn history. Brits did not send their bottom dwellers to the colonies. That's a pretty broad and inaccurate statement. The British Empire viewed the American colonies as an extremely important region economically, militarily, etc. If you think they sent all the dregs over here, you are totally wrong. Some prisoners were sent here, but it was around 10% or so of all the people that emigrated here before 1776. You seem to have a historically inaccurate theory that to become a superpower, all a country has to do is exploit the "bottom dwellers" in that country. That was definitely not true in America. You said, "Countries become superpowers through exploitation. The British exploited their colonises, the US exploited their slaves" Completely wrong. Why wasn't the US a superpower in 1860 when slavery was at it's peak? Why are the last states who had slaves in this country the poorest? Shouldn't they be the richest since they exploited the most people? You might seem like a smart guy when you're hanging out with your friends, who are probably all dumb as fuck, but you have a depthless view of history.
Hey dumbass I guess you've never heard of other colonies like Australia. Could you even find it on the map?
Keep trying to spin things to create a fictitious argument. It must pain you to see yourself constantly failing.
-
You still have provided no proof that the wealth of the US was created by slaves let alone freed slaves and their descendants. It's a terrible argument that's devoid of any kind of facts.
I'll provide proof, and I hope you have the time and intellect to read and understand. Although I'm sure, you'll conjure up some bullshit. But that's ok, HERE is the proof...
America’s Slaves Were More Valuable Than All Its Industrial Capital Combined
By MATTHEW YGLESIAS
Thomas Piketty and Gabriel Zucman have a new paper out about the historical evolution of wealth in a number of different prominent countries, and it features this chart for the United States that really drives home the amazing reality of America’s antebellum slave economy. The “human capital” consisting of black men and women held as chattel in the states of the south was more valuable than all the industrial and transportation capital (“other domestic capital”) of the country in the first half of the nineteenth century. When you consider that the institution of slavery was limited to specific subset of the country, you can see that in the region where it held sway slave wealth was wealth.
In their discussion, the point Piketty and Zucman make about this is that slave wealth was the functional equivalent of land wealth in a country where agricultural land was abundant. The typical European wealth-holding pattern was of an economic elite composed of wealthy landowners in a environment of scarce usable land. In America, land was plentiful since you could steal it from Native Americans. That should could have led to an egalitarian distribution of wealth, but instead an alternative agrarian elite emerged that did happen to own large stocks of land but whose wealthy was primarily composed of owning the human beings who worked the land rather than owning the land itself.
Here is the link to said paper http://www.parisschoolofeconomics.com/zucman-gabriel/capitalisback/PikettyZucman2013WP.pdf
-
Northern Indians dislike much darker South Indians.
My ex-girlfriend - whose family was from Heyderabad - really didn't like Black British people. Didn't mind Africans, but said black Brits were not to be trusted. Bit rich IMO, esp considering the amount of first cousin marriages within her immediate family.
-
Hey dumbass I guess you've never heard of other colonies like Australia. Could you even find it on the map?
Keep trying to spin things to create a fictitious argument. It must pain you to see yourself constantly failing.
Are we talking about Australia? I thought we were talking about the US? Talk about spin.
-
I'll provide proof, and I hope you have the time and intellect to read and understand. Although I'm sure, you'll conjure up some bullshit. But that's ok, HERE is the proof...
America’s Slaves Were More Valuable Than All Its Industrial Capital Combined
That was true, before the second industrial revolution when we an agrarian economy but that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about the rise of the US as a superpower. That was around 1900 or so. You're still talking late 1700's early 1800's. Not relevant.
-
That was true, before the second industrial revolution when we an agrarian economy but that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about the rise of the US as a superpower. That was around 1900 or so. You're still talking late 1700's early 1800's. Not relevant.
Yes, even without the Civil War, slavery would not have lasted much longer, the second industrial revolution and mechanisation made it redundant in the long-term.
-
I'll provide proof, and I hope you have the time and intellect to read and understand. Although I'm sure, you'll conjure up some bullshit. But that's ok, HERE is the proof...
America’s Slaves Were More Valuable Than All Its Industrial Capital Combined
By MATTHEW YGLESIAS
Thomas Piketty and Gabriel Zucman have a new paper out about the historical evolution of wealth in a number of different prominent countries, and it features this chart for the United States that really drives home the amazing reality of America’s antebellum slave economy. The “human capital” consisting of black men and women held as chattel in the states of the south was more valuable than all the industrial and transportation capital (“other domestic capital”) of the country in the first half of the nineteenth century. When you consider that the institution of slavery was limited to specific subset of the country, you can see that in the region where it held sway slave wealth was wealth.
In their discussion, the point Piketty and Zucman make about this is that slave wealth was the functional equivalent of land wealth in a country where agricultural land was abundant. The typical European wealth-holding pattern was of an economic elite composed of wealthy landowners in a environment of scarce usable land. In America, land was plentiful since you could steal it from Native Americans. That should could have led to an egalitarian distribution of wealth, but instead an alternative agrarian elite emerged that did happen to own large stocks of land but whose wealthy was primarily composed of owning the human beings who worked the land rather than owning the land itself.
Here is the link to said paper http://www.parisschoolofeconomics.com/zucman-gabriel/capitalisback/PikettyZucman2013WP.pdf
Dumbo Wiggly,
- North American Indians have slave
- Africans in Africa have slaves , Tripoli market still operates ;)
- Why J.C. didn't free African slaves in Americas :-\
-
Are we talking about Australia? I thought we were talking about the US? Talk about spin.
You were only one talking about the US. I've said Colonies all along as the Brits shipped off their bottom dwellers all over the globe. Not once have I said Colony.
Is that too difficult for you to understand too?
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcT4k-n-koqkssZVLQFWIOp2LhvgHah-uhv6m5a9EFJK3i8j-a0i)
-
You were only one talking about the US. I've said Colonies all along as the Brits shipped off their bottom dwellers all over the globe. Not once have I said Colony.
Is that too difficult for you to understand too?
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcT4k-n-koqkssZVLQFWIOp2LhvgHah-uhv6m5a9EFJK3i8j-a0i)
We were talking about superpowers, specifically the US. You brought up Australia out of nowhere. Has nothing to do with the topic.
-
We were talking about superpowers, specifically the US. You brought up Australia out of nowhere. Has nothing to do with the topic.
By we, I think you mean you. I've only spoken about and expanded on my original post which was maybe 1/4 about the US.
The rest is fixating on things you think I've said.
-
My ex-girlfriend - whose family was from Heyderabad - really didn't like Black British people. Didn't mind Africans, but said black Brits were not to be trusted. Bit rich IMO, esp considering the amount of first cousin marriages within her immediate family.
To be fair, you were making pleasant chitchat and behaving like a respectable fellow with them, but whenever they weren't around you were ferociously cramming yourself up their daughter, so there was some validity to their claim.
-
To be fair, you were making pleasant chitchat and behaving like a respectable fellow with them, but whenever they weren't around you were ferociously cramming yourself up their daughter, so there was some validity to their claim.
Ha, there probably is some validity in that, but i'm white council estate vermin. Not a black dude.
However, I did use to culturally appropriate and post as Purple Aki back in the day.
-
We are most likely going to see a new monetary system where the dollar will no longer be the reserve currency. That will probably become some form of a basket. This is the collapse of the West just as communism collapsed and altered the course of China and Russia. Therefore, we are looking at the shift of the financial capitol of the world from the West to the East dominated in India/China.
-
Good Indian news: Millions of muslims in panic , Pakistan is panicking ;D, Hindus want mohamedans to fuck off from India , great Christmas news !.
-
We are most likely going to see a new monetary system where the dollar will no longer be the reserve currency. That will probably become some form of a basket. This is the collapse of the West just as communism collapsed and altered the course of China and Russia. Therefore, we are looking at the shift of the financial capitol of the world from the West to the East dominated in India/China.
North America, Europe, Japan and other Western aligned countries would then just have a basket of their own national currencies.
The result could be a split between East and West as opposed to a shift of the financial capitals of the world.
-
Ha, there probably is some validity in that, but i'm white council estate vermin. Not a black dude.
However, I did use to culturally appropriate and post as Purple Aki back in the day.
I remember him fondly, although I'm a little surprised that irl no one ever took the dude out. Not so much out of bravery or anger as from concluding that compliance is riskier than confrontation. Don't know what I'd do until I was there shitting myself but giving that guy your back can't be a good strategy.
I say you were also Your MAAAAaaaa, ya chav bastad.
-
By we, I think you mean you. I've only spoken about and expanded on my original post which was maybe 1/4 about the US.
He means we and nothing else.
-
North America, Europe, Japan and other Western aligned countries would then just have a basket of their own national currencies.
The result could be a split between East and West as opposed to a shift of the financial capitals of the world.
We are plagued with politicians who are incapable of making any changes to save the country because they are too busy grabbing the free soap in the hotel room. The fall of communism in 1989 was abrupt and swept from China to Russia within a matter of months. Western political systems will simply collapse by this same process.
There is no exception to this phenomenon. We live in a sheltered world that assumes man can control the economy and society. We simply cannot accomplish this miracle because we always self-destruct. The stress on the world monetary system will be seen outside the USA. We have seen defaults on foreign denominated debt by now in Lebanon. This is just the beginning. We are looking at a contagion spreading in 2020 on a global scale.
-
Loved you back in the 80s!
For some reason I can’t click YouTube links on here anymore - and no pictures from them show!!
But - yes - the 80’s were my glory days!! I was SO close to destroying earth - until that friggin rabbit got in the way!
-
For some reason I can’t click YouTube links on here anymore - and no pictures from them show!!
But - yes - the 80’s were my glory days!! I was SO close to destroying earth - until that friggin rabbit got in the way!
The Rabbit symbolizes liberals and globalists that promote multiculturalism.
With the way things are going in Sweden and other places in Europe (and even USA), i wouldn't mind seeing an Alien Superpower invading.
Nothing could be worse.
-
there was a big and popular thread on Reddit where all its hippie liberal users discussed travelling all over the world. Most of the commentors disliked travelling to India.
-
there was a big and popular thread on Reddit where all its hippie liberal users discussed travelling all over the world. Most of the commentors disliked travelling to India.
Too much shit in the streets and corpses in the rivers probably
-
-
Millions of Paki muslims a facing deportation from India ;D
-
(https://media.giphy.com/media/l3q2Z6S6n38zjPswo/giphy.gif)
-
We are plagued with politicians who are incapable of making any changes to save the country because they are too busy grabbing the free soap in the hotel room. The fall of communism in 1989 was abrupt and swept from China to Russia within a matter of months. Western political systems will simply collapse by this same process.
There is no exception to this phenomenon. We live in a sheltered world that assumes man can control the economy and society. We simply cannot accomplish this miracle because we always self-destruct. The stress on the world monetary system will be seen outside the USA. We have seen defaults on foreign denominated debt by now in Lebanon. This is just the beginning. We are looking at a contagion spreading in 2020 on a global scale.
Ahem.
-
We are plagued with politicians who are incapable of making any changes to save the country because they are too busy grabbing the free soap in the hotel room. The fall of communism in 1989 was abrupt and swept from China to Russia within a matter of months. Western political systems will simply collapse by this same process.
There is no exception to this phenomenon. We live in a sheltered world that assumes man can control the economy and society. We simply cannot accomplish this miracle because we always self-destruct. The stress on the world monetary system will be seen outside the USA. We have seen defaults on foreign denominated debt by now in Lebanon. This is just the beginning. We are looking at a contagion spreading in 2020 on a global scale.
Sad, but truer words have never been said. History proves you right, unfortunately.