Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Matt on August 20, 2020, 10:19:30 PM
-
I'm reminded of the amazing Getbig thread about the disgusting documentary "Rocco". There was another documentary that glorified some Peeping Tom, who was peeping on couples who went to a motel that he owned. Absolutely disgusting.
-
Check the Like to Dislike ratio:
-
the acceptance of homosexuality came with a legal infrastructure, a mandate - protection under the law – groundwork upon which pedophilia will also be rolled out into the public domain and 'normalized'
anyone who opposes will be labeled a hateful 'pedophobe', and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
-
Yep.
-
the acceptance of homosexuality came with a legal infrastructure, a mandate - protection under the law – groundwork upon which pedophilia will also be rolled out into the public domain and 'normalized'
anyone who opposes will be labeled a hateful 'pedophobe', and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
They're already working their "magic". Gaslighting people who are against pedos.
Soon anti-pedo will be a form of hate.
Author Jeanna Bryner.
(https://i.postimg.cc/zDFsNmD2/fsgsfgsgsf.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/VvXLfK6B/Ef5-Tb5-PXs-AQx-XBv.jpg)
-
Wtf is going on
-
The name though, 'Cuties' ???
-
somebody watches weekend warrior channel
-
Yep.
sometimes - I wonder... if there are any left amongst u... willing, and able.... to fight
LMFAO
-
World is going to shit thanks to libs and the globalist agenda
I'm glad i'm old and don't have to see 2060
-
The left has been quiet on the pro paedophile agenda lately but I agree that it is the direction they are headed if PC culture is allowed to continue unabated....
It's one of the main reasons the left is doomed to fail, they always push further to the extremes.
I think a massive loss for the dems at the upcoming election is inevitable already.
-
The left has been quiet on the pro paedophile agenda lately but I agree that it is the direction they are headed if PC culture is allowed to continue unabated....
It's one of the main reasons the left is doomed to fail, they always push further to the extremes.
I think a massive loss for the dems at the upcoming election is inevitable already.
Agreed. It almost seems like the establishment either wants another Trump win - or at the least, is ok with another Trump win. I'm not sure why that is. Maybe they felt at first he was a wildcard, but later on found out that he could be controlled.
-
-
Come on Matt, you're more intelligent than that bullshit title.
Whilst the sexualisation of children is certainly something that shouldn't happen - it also true that having the sexualisation of children on your service does NOT mean you're "endorsing" pedophillia. Same as having John Wick on your service doesn't mean you're endorsing murder. Same as having all manner of fucked up things on there does. I don't see many people complaining along the same lines when Oldboy is on there and boy is that a ride.
I expect this to go way over a number of heads, here - but I think you're intelligent enough to understand what I'm saying. We don't need to sensationalise everything beyond the realm of truth.
Regardless of whether there is a film about children dressing provocatively, it is still at the hands of the depraved individuals watching it to commit the crimes associated with it.
Should the film exist? Probably not. Should it be on netflix? Seems like a foolish move.
But the fact is, if you're feeling a stirring in your fucking pants from watching that shit, it's not netflix's fault, it's your own. Netflix didn't endorse your pedophillia.
Edit: I hadn't actually watch the trailer - it's actually the name that is the worst part of it. It just gives it the worst light. If it had been named "generic kids dance movie", it would have probably snuck through.
-
the only thing the left considers to be "perverted" is an unattractive man lusting an attractive woman
E
-
They're already working their "magic". Gaslighting people who are against pedos.
Soon anti-pedo will be a form of hate.
Author Jeanna Bryner.
(https://i.postimg.cc/zDFsNmD2/fsgsfgsgsf.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/VvXLfK6B/Ef5-Tb5-PXs-AQx-XBv.jpg)
Yep, we called this years ago with the legalization of gay marriage. The slippery slope concept front and center.
-
They're already working their "magic". Gaslighting people who are against pedos.
Soon anti-pedo will be a form of hate.
Author Jeanna Bryner.
(https://i.postimg.cc/zDFsNmD2/fsgsfgsgsf.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/VvXLfK6B/Ef5-Tb5-PXs-AQx-XBv.jpg)
That may have worked in the past.
But thanks to the arrests Epstein and Maxwell, these weak gas-lighting attempts will fall flat on it’s face. It has too much mainstream attention now. The press corps is even discussing it!
https://mobile.twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1296213468433879040?s=10
-
They're already working their "magic". Gaslighting people who are against pedos.
Soon anti-pedo will be a form of hate.
Author Jeanna Bryner.
(https://i.postimg.cc/zDFsNmD2/fsgsfgsgsf.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/VvXLfK6B/Ef5-Tb5-PXs-AQx-XBv.jpg)
Come on guys. I really wish some of you would actually check your shit before posting
That article doesn't exist
In fact, it is a doctored version of this article to make dickheads pass it around, without actually checking it. Yet more sensationalism.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/
"Homophobes Might Be Hidden Homosexuals"
Not.. ARE. Not anything to do with pedophiles.
I don't give a fuck if you're left or right. If you're going to say some shit, just do a basic search.
No scientific paper is going to ever make an absolute statement (ie, use the language ARE) based on statistical analysis. Hence the language "might" in the real paper.
-
Well, here's another one:
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/12/18/a-ut-professor-advocates-pedophilia-why-are-we-paying-for-it/
-
Come on guys. I really wish some of you would actually check your shit before posting
That article doesn't exist
In fact, it is a doctored version of this article to make dickheads pass it around, without actually checking it. Yet more sensationalism.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/
"Homophobes Might Be Hidden Homosexuals"
Not.. ARE. Not anything to do with pedophiles.
I don't give a fuck if you're left or right. If you're going to say some shit, just do a basic search.
No scientific paper is going to ever make an absolute statement (ie, use the language ARE) based on statistical analysis. Hence the language "might" in the real paper.
Reminds me of a Quentin Crisp quote
"Some queers are rough, but some roughs are queer...."
-
Well, here's another one:
https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/12/18/a-ut-professor-advocates-pedophilia-why-are-we-paying-for-it/
That isn't another one.
It's a disagreeable opinion, no doubt - but it doesn't cast aspersions about anybody but the author, himself.
Do you see the difference?
Don't you see that the more you look at what is happening in society today, people have figured out that exaggerating shit to manipulate people into being angry is now a massive commodity. And we're not talking about it being the right or the left. It's a lot of people from a lot of walks of life. We're being massively manipulated these days and until we all say "fucking cite your references, c.unt" every time we read something, we're going to keep getting tricked and giving attention to people for the wrong reasons. This shit is the reason why you can't say anything thesedays without some weak bitch getting offended. You're now allowed to use the loosest crap to base your anger on because people just love the idea of anger. They don't give a fuck if it is righteous or not.
-
That isn't another one.
It's a disagreeable opinion, no doubt - but it doesn't cast aspersions about anybody but the author, himself.
Do you see the difference?
Don't you see that the more you look at what is happening in society today, people have figured out that exaggerating shit to manipulate people into being angry is now a massive commodity. And we're not talking about it being the right or the left. It's a lot of people from a lot of walks of life. We're being massively manipulated these days and until we all say "fucking cite your references, c.unt" every time we read something, we're going to keep getting tricked and giving attention to people for the wrong reasons. This shit is the reason why you can't say anything thesedays without some weak bitch getting offended. You're now allowed to use the loosest crap to base your anger on because people just love the idea of anger. They don't give a fuck if it is righteous or not.
There are articles all over about the guy. If you want to defend him, fine.
-
There are articles all over about the guy. If you want to defend him, fine.
Quote the bit where I defend him.
Cite your fucking source.
-
Things that liberals/Democrats/Leftists believe in and advocate for in no particular order........
1. Socialism and/or Communism
2. Political violence. Burning. Looting. Assaulting and sometimes killing people that oppose their ideology.
3. Censoring the free speech of Americans and firing people from their jobs for wrong think.
4. Disarming the population and revoking their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
5. Killing babies by aborting unwanted pregnancies all the way up to birth....and sometimes beyond
6. Forcing parents to accept gender reassignment for their children with hormone blockers and sometimes surgery
7. Sexualization of children and normalization of peedophilia.
8. Tearing down and removing all mention of God in our society. The Chistian God only. Mooslims, Buddists, and all other forms of religion are fine.
9. Hatred and genocide of white people.
10. Massive third world immigration.
I could go on. The political left has been taken over by radical luciferians. They despise good and love evil all the while deluding themselves that they are full of love and compassion.
-
Quote the bit where I defend him.
Cite your fucking source.
You think your smarter than you are^
What are you? an undergrad student? Your posts remind me of their classic pseudo-intellectualist rubbish.
-
Angie verona fully developed body at 12 its a sick game our lord is playing :o :( >:( :o
-
Why would any toy company be selling.....
"A children's doll that reveals provocative outfits when dipped into cold water has prompted anger and calls for it to be removed from shelves."
""Who the f**k thinks it's okay to put a hidden message on a little girl's doll that's got tape around her privates that says 'caution' and have shackles on her hands?"
ABC news:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-19/outrage-builds-over-sexualised-lol-surprise-kids-dolls/12572752 (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-19/outrage-builds-over-sexualised-lol-surprise-kids-dolls/12572752)
(https://i.postimg.cc/G3vjz6dz/Ef36htp-Xs-AMHZm8.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/WbnwcrDk/Ef36-KXDXg-AEY-9q.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/7YDnRXL4/Ef36-Mxj-Xk-AA4gy-L.png)
The Toy Company owner Isaass Larian:
(https://i.postimg.cc/zBTHqZff/merlin-165750795-642b4b50-77fd-4ba8-8a78-1ba763e3cd7a-article-Large.jpg)
-
You think your smarter than you are^
What are you? a first year undergrad student? Your posts remind me of their classic pseudo-intellectualism rubbish.
It's so easy to claim pseudointellectual on stuff and claim you have a point, yet I never claimed anything. I just want us to call bullshit on everything and get smarter about being manipulated. I don't give a fuck what you believe, just don't try to deceive me or other people. There's plenty of good points on many sides for many issues, we don't need to allow people to photoshop articles or deliberately modify a sentiment to make us angry.
If you have a problem about that or think it is pseudointellectual, no problem. For me, I think it's about being a responsible human being that doesn't lie to anybody. When I see shit like Rhonda Rousey is a transphobic, because she responds to someone's question about whether she thinks they have an athletic advantage, I think about how utterly fucking weak society has gotten that we're now accepting utter bullshit because it's juicer than the truth.
Sorry that you find that pseudo intellectual, but quite honest, I'd be fairly sure that you're probably not all that chuffed about some people who are lying to you right now. I'm not an enemy of anything but that.
Peace, brother.
-
Why would any toy company be selling.....
From the same quality of mind that thought it was a good idea to have a children's dance movie that was already a bit questionable and then go further and retardedly name it "Cuties"
-
Who is this garbage? The same lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill in 2017 to remove the felony penalty for knowingly exposing another person to HIV.
Scott Weiner
Article: No California Shouldn’t Decriminalize Adult Sex With 14-Year-Olds
https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/12/no-california-shouldnt-decriminalize-adult-sex-with-14-year-olds
(https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/12/no-california-shouldnt-decriminalize-adult-sex-with-14-year-olds)
"Under current law — which Wiener, who is gay, describes as “horrific homophobia” — a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it, but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option."
"State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco — the same lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill in 2017 to remove the felony penalty for knowingly exposing another person to HIV — has introduced a bill, Senate Bill 145 to give judges more flexibility in sentencing gay men who abuse minors."
(https://i.postimg.cc/WbfNfNmP/scott-wiener-hed-2016.png)
-
Netflix doesn't even understand why people are complaining
Complaints to Netflix:
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZYsPjNQY/Ef4dca-JXo-AEq-Kz-T.jpg)
(https://i.postimg.cc/28qQt6pQ/Ef4dc-BWWk-AAs-GCU.jpg)
-
They work tirelessly on subversion until people give up and that's when they get what they want:
Kathy Hoffman
This is the tip of the iceberg.
https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/06/24/board-of-ed-scraps-proposal-on-sex-education-rules/ (https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/06/24/board-of-ed-scraps-proposal-on-sex-education-rules/)
(https://i.postimg.cc/1zcWCtxm/yyyyyteteey.jpg)
-
Entertainment industry approved:
Lady Gaga Wears Explicit Disney T-Shirt, But Has The Pop Star Gone Too Far
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/06/26/lady-gaga-explicit-disney-t-shirt_n_7669270.html
(https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/06/26/lady-gaga-explicit-disney-t-shirt_n_7669270.html)
(https://i.postimg.cc/DZVcT4sk/Efm-PY-f-Xg-AAz8i-K.jpg)
-
So you're all blaming liberals yet who is the president and who is running this country? Make up your fucking minds.
-
1 - Claiming the left is pro-pedo, yet it is the Republican President palling around with Epstein and his recruiter "I wish her well". It is usually a GOP play book tactic to actually get caught in motel rooms with underage kids or fall victim to kiddie porn discovery.
2 - Claiming pedo is a more dominant trait in queer people, yet studies show the majority of pedos are straight and identify as heterosexual.
3 - How is swearing on a Dr Seuss book any different than swearing on the Bible? They are both fictional children stories.
Pedos are garbage and should be shot upon conviction.
-
Entertainment industry approved:
Lady Gaga Wears Explicit Disney T-Shirt, But Has The Pop Star Gone Too Far
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/06/26/lady-gaga-explicit-disney-t-shirt_n_7669270.html
(https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/06/26/lady-gaga-explicit-disney-t-shirt_n_7669270.html)
(https://i.postimg.cc/DZVcT4sk/Efm-PY-f-Xg-AAz8i-K.jpg)
Why are you surprised? They make them and they break them. They should make an insane asylum, and call it Hollywood.
-
1 - Claiming the left is pro-pedo, yet it is the Republican President palling around with Epstein and his recruiter "I wish her well". It is usually a GOP play book tactic to actually get caught in motel rooms with underage kids or fall victim to kiddie porn discovery.
2 - Claiming pedo is a more dominant trait in queer people, yet studies show the majority of pedos are straight and identify as heterosexual.
3 - How is swearing on a Dr Seuss book any different than swearing on the Bible? They are both fictional children stories.
Pedos are garbage and should be shot upon conviction.
Palling around with Epstein? That would be Bill Clinton and not Trump. If there was a Trump connection to Epstein, it would be all over the news. Clinton is the one spotted on the island and the one with the numerous flights on Epstein's plane. Pedo is a total left wing problem. Epstein, big democratic donor.
https://www.amny.com/news/village-district-leaders-son-gets-1-to-3-years-for-child-porn/ Deblasio staffer
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/democratic-donor-ed-buck-faces-additional-charges-linked-overdose-deaths-n1235840
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/nyregion/anthony-weiner-prison-release.html
Not even going to get into what a creep John Podesta is.
https://californiaglobe.com/legislature/ca-democrats-author-bill-to-protect-sex-offenders-who-lure-minors/ Protecting their own!
-
Quote the bit where I defend him.
Cite your fucking source.
"Yes. Your retarted"
-
They work tirelessly on subversion until people give up and that's when they get what they want:
Kathy Hoffman
This is the tip of the iceberg.
https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/06/24/board-of-ed-scraps-proposal-on-sex-education-rules/ (https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/06/24/board-of-ed-scraps-proposal-on-sex-education-rules/)
(https://i.postimg.cc/1zcWCtxm/yyyyyteteey.jpg)
these people are sick bastards
turns my stomach when i hear about their agenda
-
(https://scontent.farn2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/118223851_3685192518175681_1345161250837731790_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=nDZ-F310Hj4AX-WwkHm&_nc_oc=AQket_63T_qLsVaiG6_Ymbq3R0r2nms9s7bqYFh3KdbApLF0fwngIdRoXH8QcNmbg5M&_nc_ht=scontent.farn2-1.fna&oh=e239c29b94319197839265178c99af31&oe=5F6595BB)
-
1 - Claiming the left is pro-pedo, yet it is the Republican President palling around with Epstein and his recruiter "I wish her well". It is usually a GOP play book tactic to actually get caught in motel rooms with underage kids or fall victim to kiddie porn discovery.
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fthestateindia.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F08%2FBill-Clinton-leans-back-and-smiles-while-receiving-neck-massage-from-Epstein-victim-22-in-never-before-seen-photos-during-trip-on-pedophiles-plane-to-Africa-in-2002.png&f=1&nofb=1)
(https://thesilversword.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/40b2261b2d0dec20b8f8d70deff5b37472976b0f26cbf0cc466a2e17503a19cf_large.jpeg)
-
Angie verona fully developed body at 12 its a sick game our lord is playing :o :( >:( :o
Strange you picked up on it...
-
Come on Matt, you're more intelligent than that bullshit title.
Whilst the sexualisation of children is certainly something that shouldn't happen - it also true that having the sexualisation of children on your service does NOT mean you're "endorsing" pedophillia. Same as having John Wick on your service doesn't mean you're endorsing murder. Same as having all manner of fucked up things on there does. I don't see many people complaining along the same lines when Oldboy is on there and boy is that a ride.
I expect this to go way over a number of heads, here - but I think you're intelligent enough to understand what I'm saying. We don't need to sensationalise everything beyond the realm of truth.
Slippery slope buddy. Sexualized kids in movies are sexualized kids regardless. Murdered John wick henchman are not actually murdered.
I recognize nuance in debates but when it comes to overtly sexualizing kids and pedohilia, its a hard line and thats the way it should be.
-
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fthestateindia.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F08%2FBill-Clinton-leans-back-and-smiles-while-receiving-neck-massage-from-Epstein-victim-22-in-never-before-seen-photos-during-trip-on-pedophiles-plane-to-Africa-in-2002.png&f=1&nofb=1)
(https://thesilversword.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/40b2261b2d0dec20b8f8d70deff5b37472976b0f26cbf0cc466a2e17503a19cf_large.jpeg)
22 years old? Kind of out of pedo range wouldn't you think?
-
1 - Claiming the left is pro-pedo, yet it is the Republican President palling around with Epstein and his recruiter "I wish her well". It is usually a GOP play book tactic to actually get caught in motel rooms with underage kids or fall victim to kiddie porn discovery.
2 - Claiming pedo is a more dominant trait in queer people, yet studies show the majority of pedos are straight and identify as heterosexual.
3 - How is swearing on a Dr Seuss book any different than swearing on the Bible? They are both fictional children stories.
Pedos are garbage and should be shot upon conviction.
2 Please learn how to read statistics. The majority of pedos identify as heterosexual but gays only make up a tiny % of the population. Homosexuals are over represented when you compare there numbers to heterosexuals. What does "identify" mean anyway? If a man is diddling a male child how in any way is that heterosexual?
-
22 years old? Kind of out of pedo range wouldn't you think?
You are (intentionally) missing the point. We have hard evidence that Bill Clinton was on Epstein's airplane, the so-called Lolita Express. Flight logs of him going to the so-called pedo-island. Now there are photographs of him with one of the girls. Then there is the eye witness testimony from an alleged victim.
You ignore all of that and instead focus on a flimsy connection with Trump even though by all accounts he had nothing to do with any of that. Imbecile.
-
You are (intentionally) missing the point. We have hard evidence that Bill Clinton was on Epstein's airplane, the so-called Lolita Express. Flight logs of him going to the so-called pedo-island. Now there are photographs of him with one of the girls. Then there is the eye witness testimony from an alleged victim.
You ignore all of that and instead focus on a flimsy connection with Trump even though by all accounts he had nothing to do with any of that. Imbecile.
I had hard evidence now it's soft.
-
They work tirelessly on subversion until people give up and that's when they get what they want:
Kathy Hoffman
This is the tip of the iceberg.
https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/06/24/board-of-ed-scraps-proposal-on-sex-education-rules/ (https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/06/24/board-of-ed-scraps-proposal-on-sex-education-rules/)
(https://i.postimg.cc/1zcWCtxm/yyyyyteteey.jpg)
She looks like one of the Dr. Seuss characters. That is one ugly bitch.
-
She probably has a dick.
-
8. Tearing down and removing all mention of God in our society. The Chistian God only. Mooslims, Buddists, and all other forms of religion are fine.
speaking of which did your triune God condemn or condone Lot fucking his daughters
-
She probably has a dick.
Judging by the chin hair....
-
Why would any toy company be selling.....
"A children's doll that reveals provocative outfits when dipped into cold water has prompted anger and calls for it to be removed from shelves."
""Who the f**k thinks it's okay to put a hidden message on a little girl's doll that's got tape around her privates that says 'caution' and have shackles on her hands?"
ABC news:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-19/outrage-builds-over-sexualised-lol-surprise-kids-dolls/12572752 (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-19/outrage-builds-over-sexualised-lol-surprise-kids-dolls/12572752)
(https://i.postimg.cc/G3vjz6dz/Ef36htp-Xs-AMHZm8.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/WbnwcrDk/Ef36-KXDXg-AEY-9q.png)
(https://i.postimg.cc/7YDnRXL4/Ef36-Mxj-Xk-AA4gy-L.png)
The Toy Company owner Isaass Larian:
(https://i.postimg.cc/zBTHqZff/merlin-165750795-642b4b50-77fd-4ba8-8a78-1ba763e3cd7a-article-Large.jpg)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Larian
-
Whenever I see men obsessed with children, especially single men, my red flag goes up. Single men with no children usually don't want to be anywhere around them.
-
I'm reminded of the amazing Getbig thread about the disgusting documentary "Rocco". There was another documentary that glorified some Peeping Tom, who was peeping on couples who went to a motel that he owned. Absolutely disgusting.
the producer
https://variety.com/2020/film/global/zangro-sundance-cuties-1203467120/
http://clermont-filmfest.com/02_marche/01_catalogue/commun/part2.pdf
-
speaking of which did your triune God condemn or condone Lot fucking his daughters
Oh, you're one of those.
-
Palling around with Epstein? That would be Bill Clinton and not Trump. If there was a Trump connection to Epstein, it would be all over the news. Clinton is the one spotted on the island and the one with the numerous flights on Epstein's plane. Pedo is a total left wing problem. Epstein, big democratic donor.
https://www.amny.com/news/village-district-leaders-son-gets-1-to-3-years-for-child-porn/ Deblasio staffer
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/democratic-donor-ed-buck-faces-additional-charges-linked-overdose-deaths-n1235840
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/nyregion/anthony-weiner-prison-release.html
Not even going to get into what a creep John Podesta is.
https://californiaglobe.com/legislature/ca-democrats-author-bill-to-protect-sex-offenders-who-lure-minors/ Protecting their own!
clintons, epstein, Maxwell. All trump associate, did you forget lyin ted brought up trumps Association with liberals at the debates?
-
(https://i.redd.it/k3h8xu6bn5a51.gif)
“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
-
Oh, you're one of those.
well did he?
And btw I acknowledge the Arab schizo was involved with a 9 yr old which according to his deluded followers that was ok
-
Weiner
Hoffman
typical wasp name
-
"Yes. You're retarted retarded"
fixed
-
You are (intentionally) missing the point. We have hard evidence that Bill Clinton was on Epstein's airplane, the so-called Lolita Express. Flight logs of him going to the so-called pedo-island. Now there are photographs of him with one of the girls. Then there is the eye witness testimony from an alleged victim.
You ignore all of that and instead focus on a flimsy connection with Trump even though by all accounts he had nothing to do with any of that. Imbecile.
::)
Yeah right.
-
well did he?
And btw I acknowledge the Arab schizo was involved with a 9 yr old which according to his deluded followers that was ok
There are many Christians that are eager to try to win people like you over through religious debate. I'm not one of them. Pick your team and let the chips fall where they may.
-
::)
Yeah right.
That's a very persuasive retort. I'll need some time to really digest it and sort through the nuance and complexity of it all.
It's strange, but I feel like I've heard that argument before somewhere. Hmmm. Oh yeah, in third grade.
-
Come on Matt, you're more intelligent than that bullshit title.
Whilst the sexualisation of children is certainly something that shouldn't happen - it also true that having the sexualisation of children on your service does NOT mean you're "endorsing" pedophillia. Same as having John Wick on your service doesn't mean you're endorsing murder. Same as having all manner of fucked up things on there does. I don't see many people complaining along the same lines when Oldboy is on there and boy is that a ride.
I expect this to go way over a number of heads, here - but I think you're intelligent enough to understand what I'm saying. We don't need to sensationalise everything beyond the realm of truth.
Regardless of whether there is a film about children dressing provocatively, it is still at the hands of the depraved individuals watching it to commit the crimes associated with it.
Should the film exist? Probably not. Should it be on netflix? Seems like a foolish move.
But the fact is, if you're feeling a stirring in your fucking pants from watching that shit, it's not netflix's fault, it's your own. Netflix didn't endorse your pedophillia.
Edit: I hadn't actually watch the trailer - it's actually the name that is the worst part of it. It just gives it the worst light. If it had been named "generic kids dance movie", it would have probably snuck through.
I didn't watch it - I won't watch it. I didn't even actively search for videos on MGTOW or dating when I initially happened into the "Better Bachelor" channel, who made the video in the OP - a video which is not part of his usual content either. His content is generally about how feminism has made women so entitled that it makes dating them impossible.
My girlfriend dumped me about two weeks ago, and I think is a possibility that my computer has been reading my texts to her, and gave me dating content, but I didn't actively search for it.
epic is back made a post above about a "weekend warrior channel" on YouTube, so I went to search for "weekend warrior Netflix" to see if there is a channel by anyone with the name Weekend Warrior who made a channel on this documentary.
I don't even want to search for the "Netflix Cuties" on YouTube, because I don't want my IP address associated with pedophilia!
And how about this rocket:
Do you know what movie I've watched AT LEAST 35 times in my life?
"Last House on the Left". And not the updated 2009 milder version - but the 1972 brutal rape and murder version.
Why? Because it was given 0 stars by a film critic who wrote a book of capsule reviews similar to Leonard Maltin's film guide. He even wrote that by giving it 0 stars [with the lowest ranking being half a star], that it was the lowest ranked movie in his book. I just spent the past 27 minutes online trying to figure out his name. He passed away in 2004 at the age of 88, but I can't even seem to find evidence of his existence.
Then I found out that Roger Ebert gave the original "Last House on the Left" 3.5 stars out of 4.
In light of the above facts, watching the movie originally made sense...as for the dozens of times I watched it since - the reason for that was because I like the musical score of the movie, the Ironage cinematography, and some of the good characters - the parents in particular.
But I always either physically skip over the rape scene [sometimes] or, more likely, phase out, go on my laptop, and watch Getbig.
I would question the mental state of anyone who pauses the movie during the rape scene to masturbate to it.
I basically lost respect for women on the whole when I realized how popular "Fifty Shades of Grey" was. We basically spent our entire lives as men being told that men were awful sexist rapists, and meanwhile, women line up in mass numbers to masturbate publicly to Fifty Shades of Grey. I will go so far as to say, I lost respect for women on the whole when I realized how popular BDSM was with them, and that respect has never come back.
But here's the thing about the Netflix movie "Cuties", rocket [correct me if I'm wrong, because I didn't, and will NOT watch this filth]: this movie is NOT a work of fiction! And that really says it all, doesn't it? If it was a fictional movie, I would still have some concern for there being real child actors working on the movie, but I could handle a fictionalized account. I could also handle an exposé style movie that covers the sickos who want to see CHILDREN stripping for money. But a movie that NORMALIZES this sort of behaviour?
Do you really not get that I don't want ATTRACTION TO CHILDREN being made to look sexy or cool or normal in any way?
Just tell me this is an exposé style movie on pedophiles, and I'll retract this post.
-
Come on guys. I really wish some of you would actually check your shit before posting
That article doesn't exist
In fact, it is a doctored version of this article to make dickheads pass it around, without actually checking it. Yet more sensationalism.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/
"Homophobes Might Be Hidden Homosexuals"
Not.. ARE. Not anything to do with pedophiles.
I don't give a fuck if you're left or right. If you're going to say some shit, just do a basic search.
No scientific paper is going to ever make an absolute statement (ie, use the language ARE) based on statistical analysis. Hence the language "might" in the real paper.
Just so you know, I did do a search for that article, and I couldn't find it. But I searched for it EXPECTING to find it. I always track down primary sources, and I had no reason to think that one didn't exist. I searched for it, and couldn't find it - but pedophile promoters have also been removing articles they write, once they realize that, you know, they get 12,000 thumbs up and 383,000 thumbs down.
I'm the first to take a contrarian position that is logical, rocket. But you seem to be telling me that I should appreciate a video that normalizes pedophilia.
Netflix had that disgusting "Rocco" documentary, to make the life of that pervert look stylized and artistic, and also had a documentary about a Peeping Tom which, AT NO POINT, had the view of a person saying that anyone who does that is a sick fuck who should be brought out back and shot.
And THAT is the problem I have with Netflix doing this - they are not making these perverts [Rocco being an exception, IMO, because he WAS engaging in consensual activity with other adults] aware of the fact that people would kill them if they were exposed, and that is exactly the sort of attitude that, as I said above, NORMALIZES their behaviour.
That is not a good thing - it is disgusting, and I consider this tantamount to an implicit endorsement of pedophilia.
People ask me if I have White Nationalist leanings. And the answer is - FUCKING OF COURSE I DO. WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T I? I'M A WHITE MAN, FOR FUCK'S SAKE. Am I supposed to be like everyone else and sit around and suck the dicks of people flooding into White countries to replace us? FUCK THAT.
But I do my friends AND my enemies a favour by exposing myself. What I am disgusted about with Netflix is the fact that they are operating in stealth manner here. Not stealth enough for people not to be disgusted with them, but ultimately, Netflix is taking REAL female CHILDREN and showing examples of them being exploited for money [again, I DID NOT AND WILL NOT WATCH THIS FILTH, so if I'm wrong about this, let me know].
Since 2013, after the trans stuff tried and failed to become mainstream, I've seen articles every year with titles like "The Surprising Number of Straight Men who are Trying Sex with Men."
::)
Apparently because bisexuality doesn't exist to these morons.
And there are consistently articles written that attempt to normalize pedophilia. Here is an example from the NEW YORK TIMES:
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html
This one shows you that people are pushing back on this:
https://www.metroweekly.com/2018/07/tedx-speaker-argues-that-pedophilia-should-be-accepted-as-an-unchangeable-sexual-orientation
Also, let me take this back a step - at age 18, despite being BRAINWASHED AT EVERY TURN to accept gay marriage, I still took issue with it. I took issue with it in the same way I would take issue with a non-Jew demanding he be allowed to have a Bar Mitzvah. If gays wanted "civil unions", FINE. But who the hell are gays to demand that a church tradition be granted to them?
I NEVER tolerated this slippery slope of anti-Christian/anti-Western values.
I was speaking out against "diversity" [meaning, White people being replaced by non-Whites in the societies where White people were the majority in the 20th century] since at least 2007, AND I WAS SPEAKING ABOUT IT USING MY REAL NAME.
But now - now things have gone so batshit to the left, that even my liberal friends are ready to vote in Trump.
Shit, they will be ready to vote in Hitler if things keep going in this direction.
-
fixed
I just copied and pasted Rocket's profile avatar phrase to prove he's a typical libtard moron.
-
I just copied and pasted Rocket's profile avatar phrase to prove he's a typical libtard moron.
I was rather saddened to see rocket's post on the matter. I admit - I haven't watched this documentary, so maybe I'm wrong. But this is a movie about 11-year-old girls that is restricted to audiences aged 17 or older.
If I'm missing something here, please let me know.
-
So you're all blaming liberals yet who is the president and who is running this country? Make up your fucking minds.
If you are saying that an entire political party can't be blamed for this, I agree with you.
But it is safe to say that all of the perverts and freaks are on the Democrat side. 98% of Netflix people [I assume that refers to investors, donors, creators, and other people close to Netflix, who basically make the decisions at Netflix] are Democrats.
Also, look at places like Baltimore - or really any Black ghetto in the USA - they have literally had Democrat governors for the past 50+ years, LOL.
I think it's safe to say the anti-American traditional values assholes have failed with their superior model.
Frankly, if I were a leftist, I would stop pushing it at this point, out of fear of another Hitler rising.
But...maybe that's where this stuff ultimately leads.
-
Slippery slope buddy. Sexualized kids in movies are sexualized kids regardless. Murdered John wick henchman are not actually murdered.
I recognize nuance in debates but when it comes to overtly sexualizing kids and pedohilia, its a hard line and thats the way it should be.
I didn't realize that rocket was some phaggot university pseudo-intellectual.
I don't think he is. So I'm just going to keep reading the thread until I have evidence one way or another.
Regarding the slippery slope, my way to deal with the cocksuckers who say "But WHY is 18 years old the legal age? Why can't it be 17 years and 360 days?!?! Are you saying a 17 year old can't drink alcohol on the even of their 18th birthday?"
Frankly, I'm at a point where I know there is at least a 5% chance that I murder one of these assholes within my lifetime.
We set rules in place for a reason. Those rules are subjectively objective.
The-17-year old drinking before his 18th birthday will be punished. Luckily for him or her, the same rules in place that make it illegal to drink before 18 also make it so that he will get a reduced penalty for violating the law while under the age of 18.
I set objective standards in place. For example, I am going to allow myself one cigarette per calendar week in the future moving forward [I'm a nonsmoker, but I was smoking cigarettes a bit this year]. Someone could easily say "But why not allow yourself TWO cigarettes a week?"
My response to them is "I've decided on one", and if they push the matter, I would say "Say that one more fucking time, and my hand goes in the air. Then if you don't apologize for it, I'm giving you a massive open-hand slap to the ground."
I'm not going down a slippery slope. I set objective lines in the sand to follow, and I follow them.
Everyone does - I'm just, as always, doing these things explicitly.
-
I didn't realize that rocket was some phaggot university pseudo-intellectual.
I don't think he is. So I'm just going to keep reading the thread until I have evidence one way or another.
Regarding the slippery slope, my way to deal with the cocksuckers who say "But WHY is 18 years old the legal age? Why can't it be 17 years and 360 days?!?! Are you saying a 17 year old can't drink alcohol on the even of their 18th birthday?"
Frankly, I'm at a point where I know there is at least a 5% chance that I murder one of these assholes within my lifetime.
We set rules in place for a reason. Those rules are subjectively objective.
The-17-year old drinking before his 18th birthday will be punished. Luckily for him or her, the same rules in place that make it illegal to drink before 18 also make it so that he will get a reduced penalty for violating the law while under the age of 18.
I set objective standards in place. For example, I am going to allow myself one cigarette per calendar week in the future moving forward [I'm a nonsmoker, but I was smoking cigarettes a bit this year]. Someone could easily say "But why not allow yourself TWO cigarettes a week?"
My response to them is "I've decided on one", and if they push the matter, I would say "Say that one more fucking time, and my hand goes in the air. Then if you don't apologize for it, I'm giving you a massive open-hand slap to the ground."
I'm not going down a slippery slope. I set objective lines in the sand to follow, and I follow them.
Everyone does - I'm just, as always, doing these things explicitly.
I hope you’re joking. If not then you might be suffering from mental illness. Look at the most conservative groups in this country. The Church. They are a treasure trove of pedophiles.
-
(https://i.redd.it/k3h8xu6bn5a51.gif)
“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
That's all you have? A video from 1992 and a quote where Trump compliments a wealthy new york society figure years before he was ever in any trouble? I think everyone under the sun has a picture of Maxwell and themselves. Was Trump on the Island? Did he take 20+ trips on Epstein's plane like Clinton? Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago in 2007 according to a member of Mar-a-lago and a Miami investigative reporter.
-
Ive been saying this for years. On this board in fact.
-
Very recently: Hasbro toy gets recalled because the toy's designers thought it would be a good idea to put a button on the doll's crotch that oooohs and gasps when pressed.
Doesn't say anything about it on the box. Troll doll.
Nice try, Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner.
This is all in the context of the push for "P" to be added on to LGBTQ.....
Start at about 1:00:
(https://i.postimg.cc/Bn39tnKx/Ee9vhy-HX0-AEQ-6-Q.jpg)
So, Rolling Stone editor Jason Fine thought it would be a good idea to get EJ Dickson(Looks Like Gilda Radner below) to write an article smearing any parent that complained.
Parent's complaints have nothing to with 'Pizzagate" or "QAnon". Rolling Stone is gaslighting Black, Latino, Asian, and White mothers. And all races complain about the people who did this.
Rolling Stones Article: "You're all nuts for noticing there's a button on the doll's private areas that gasps when pressed"
(https://i.postimg.cc/LsMX9SH7/Ee9vh-Qs-Xg-AIp-HN.jpg)
"EJ Dickson" is the name the writer goes by.
(https://i.postimg.cc/SNhkYd02/Tji-GB-zu-400x400.jpg)
-
I hope you’re joking. If not then you might be suffering from mental illness. Look at the most conservative groups in this country. The Church. They are a treasure trove of pedophiles.
I would have to study the per-capita rates of pedophilia in the church, in order to evaluate the merits of your claim. I'm slightly more concerned with rabbis who genitally mutilate Jewish babies, but - if you pressed me - I agree with you that it appears to be the case that The Catholic Church has an above average rate of pedophilia.
Which somewhat makes sense - if you force clergy to suppress natural sexual desires, is it really such a shock that you would have some of them pushing back against their religious programming by having sex with people unlikely to report them?
I'm NOT justifying it. In fact, I'm agreeing with you that at the least, it seems to be a thing [IMO]. With all the Christian bashing out there, I'm skeptical, but...my mathematical spidey sense is tingling, and I think you are right.
But just a question for you - just because there is pedophilia in the church, how does that justify Netflix making movies that implicitly normalize pedophilia? Also, do you have an answer to the question of why a movie about 11-year-old children is restricted to audiences over the age of 17?
I remember watching the 1995 movie "KIDS" when I was 13 when it came to The Movie Network [Canada's Ironage version of HBO]...and thinking how sick it was. If that movie came out today, I would think "God, our culture is swirling around a toilet bowl!" But here's the thing - the movie "KIDS" was a work of fiction!
Ugh, I feel like I need to watch this movie now before I make a judgment on it...and I REALLY don't want to do that.
PS: El Diablo Blanco - I would have assumed you were Catholic judging by your Spanish user name, but since you aren't, what do you make of The Pope's audience hall? Have you seen it? Also, are you from Latin America? I ask you because I have a question about Latin America. I apologize if my not knowing that offends you, although I don't know why that question would be offensive.
-
Do you really not get that I don't want ATTRACTION TO CHILDREN being made to look sexy or cool or normal in any way?
I think that it's more that you're not really getting me. I'm tired of being clickbaited into shit. Everywhere I look now, titles are downright bullshit. Everybody has figured out that sort of 20% lying gets you more views, these days - and it's hard to read anything that is balanced. When I read your name on the thread, I click on it because I'm not expecting that.
Netflix aren't endorsing pedophilia. Endorsing means you actively support and encourage the practice. They aren't endorsing anything on their service.
They might be showing something that depicts it (in this case, they aren't) - or is a bit too borderline close to it (they are), but they aren't actually endorsing it.
As far as being against having that stuff, you be you. I've got no complaints.
I think you're preaching to the choir when you talk about being against pedophilia (a friend of mine's father is in jail for possession of material of that nature, AND the friend believes there may have been instances with young relatives. This was a guy who was beating his wife, his kids throughout the time I knew him and meanwhile masquerading as a quirky cool guy when anybody like I was around, some evil shit). Another friend's Dad is jail for raping him as a kid. All this shit happening in a small circle of like 6 friends and I had no idea. Neither of these guys gave any indication it was happening. It's almost a fairytale to me. I have to admit, I still don't fully believe them - because it's that much of a deviation from my own life, it's insane.
As for that article - I got suspicious by the wording because it is a paper on scientific american. When I couldn't find it at all on google, I thought "was that so inflammatory, they deleted it?". On a whim, I decided to search the author's name - and low and behold, the true one appeared. It was a genius move by the troll who made that image, though. It is certainly the type of shit that people would share first and ask questions.. well mostly never.
And I respect your choice to not watch it - the only reason I watched the trailer was because I wanted to make sure they weren't endorsing it. As I said, it appears to be a kids move that looks to go too far with some of the dancing. But really, the issue is that it is named ab-so-fucking-lutely heinously, ensuring that everybody who watches it has already basically been led down the sexualisation path. Trust me, the person who named that and made the posters started this shit. They might as well have called it "sluts". I haven't seen really any dancing movies, so I don't know what the line is, but my guess is, if you call something "cuties" and then have young girls doing crotch thrusts, you're fucked ;D
-
"Yes. Your retarted"
It's an ironic statement that had a little more weight about 15 years ago, when I used to read that a lot from people on this board. These days, it seems to be something less misspelled (retarded). "Your" still reigns supreme, though.
-
Whenever I see men obsessed with children, especially single men, my red flag goes up. Single men with no children usually don't want to be anywhere around them.
Yeah, that's just one archetype and it might not even be the most prevalent.
Both pedophiles I've been unfortunately exposed to were hiding that shit behind having their own children and keeping it all very compartmentalised, so we never found out. I spent 5 years of highschool with a guy who was getting done by his father and not a fucking word did he speak to anybody.
The amount of sexual abuse that people I've known have told me about in the last few years is nuts - one thing is very clear to me, if it happens to someone, I feel like not that many of the actual acts are being spoken about to anybody.
-
I think that it's more that you're not really getting me. I'm tired of being clickbaited into shit. Everywhere I look now, titles are downright bullshit. Everybody has figured out that sort of 20% lying gets you more views, these days - and it's hard to read anything that is balanced. When I read your name on the thread, I click on it because I'm not expecting that.
Netflix aren't endorsing pedophilia. Endorsing means you actively support and encourage the practice. They aren't endorsing anything on their service.
They might be showing something that depicts it (in this case, they aren't) - or is a bit too borderline close to it (they are), but they aren't actually endorsing it.
As far as being against having that stuff, you be you. I've got no complaints.
I think you're preaching to the choir when you talk about being against pedophilia (a friend of mine's father is in jail for possession of material of that nature, AND the friend believes there may have been instances with young relatives. This was a guy who was beating his wife, his kids throughout the time I knew him and meanwhile masquerading as a quirky cool guy when anybody like I was around, some evil shit). Another friend's Dad is jail for raping him as a kid. All this shit happening and I had no idea. Neither of these guys gave any indication it was happening. It's almost a fairytale to me.
As for that article - I got suspicious by the wording because it is a paper on scientific american. When I couldn't find it at all on google, I thought "was that so inflammatory, they deleted it?". On a whim, I decided to search the author's name - and low and behold, the true one appeared. It was a genius move by the troll who made that image, though. It is certainly the type of shit that people would share first and ask questions.. well mostly never.
And I respect your choice to not watch it - the only reason I watched the trailer was because I wanted to make sure they weren't endorsing it. As I said, it appears to be a kids move that looks to go too far with some of the dancing. But really, the issue is that it is named ab-so-fucking-lutely heinously, ensuring that everybody who watches it has already basically been led down the sexualisation path. Trust me, the person who named that and made the posters started this shit. They might as well have called it "sluts". I haven't seen really any dancing movies, so I don't know what the line is, but my guess is, if you call something "cuties" and then have young girls doing crotch thrusts, you're fucked ;D
I agree with you about Clickbait titles, rocket. But you know me - If I have a few friends over and need to excuse myself to take a piss, I literally spend 10 minutes justifying why I have to use my own bathroom in my own house, while my friends on my couches drunk watching a UFC pay-per-view.
So because I write SO MUCH, I decided that I need to write less in general - including shorter titles.
So...I decided to go with this title because I felt it was an appropriate title. I figured, we could be more nuanced in the thread - and we have been. But I do think it's safe to say that Netflix is promoting pedophilia - if not the act itself, the normalization of pedophiles, even if by "pedophile", they would say they are only referring to "Adults who are attracted to prepubescent children, but who do not act on their urges."
I don't want to throw people in prison for THOUGHT CRIMES. If there are people who are attracted to children, but they manage those urges by not putting themselves in places where children are present in large numbers [in Thunder Bay - that would be The Canada Games Complex, in the bleachers, watching children swim], and if they make it a point to never be alone with children...then I can't say they committed a crime.
But I STILL don't want their sexual urges to be normalized in any way, or pushed on people [ONLY White people, and maybe Asians] to feel sorry for people who have these urges.
And that's the sense I'm getting here - Netflix is producing a documentary that is subtly [or maybe not so subtly, based on this potentially being the worst ranked {most Dislikes/Thumbs downed} video in YouTube's HISTORY] normalizing pedophilia here.
Does the video end by giving people the impression that pedophilia is WRONG? Or do people who watch it end the video STILL thinking pedophilia is wrong, but only because they always felt that way? My impression is that the latter is happening.
If there is anything you think I'm missing here, rocket, let me know. I realize you have the contrarian [I would even say the UNDERDOG] position here, and I respect people who have the balls to play devil's advocate when it comes to unpopular topics.
I just think...this movie seems to be attempting to make the commercial exploitation of children look hip and cool. And I don't like that at all.
And since I didn't watch this movie, I hold out the possibility that I may be wrong.
-
(https://i56.photozi.com/images/5BiwK.png) (https://www.photozi.com/image/5BiwK)
-
I agree with you about Clickbait titles, rocket. But you know me - If I have a few friends over and need to excuse myself to take a piss, I literally spend 10 minutes justifying why I have to use my own bathroom in my own house, while my friends on my couches drunk watching a UFC pay-per-view.
So because I write SO MUCH, I decided that I need to write less in general - including shorter titles.
So...I decided to go with this title because I felt it was an appropriate title. I figured, we could be more nuanced in the thread - and we have been. But I do think it's safe to say that Netflix is promoting pedophilia - if not the act itself, the normalization of pedophiles, even if by "pedophile", they would say they are only referring to "Adults who are attracted to prepubescent children, but who do not act on their urges."
I don't want to throw people in prison for THOUGHT CRIMES. If there are people who are attracted to children, but they manage those urges by not putting themselves in places where children are present in large numbers [in Thunder Bay - that would be The Canada Games Complex, in the bleachers, watching children swim], and if they make it a point to never be alone with children...then I can't say they committed a crime.
But I STILL don't want their sexual urges to be normalized in any way, or pushed on people [ONLY White people, and maybe Asians] to feel sorry for people who have these urges.
And that's the sense I'm getting here - Netflix is producing a documentary that is subtly [or maybe not so subtly, based on this potentially being the worst ranked {most Dislikes/Thumbs downed} video in YouTube's HISTORY] normalizing pedophilia here.
Does the video end by giving people the impression that pedophilia is WRONG? Or do people who watch it end the video STILL thinking pedophilia is wrong, but only because they always felt that way? My impression is that the latter is happening.
If there is anything you think I'm missing here, rocket, let me know. I realize you have the contrarian [I would even say the UNDERDOG] position here, and I respect people who have the balls to play devil's advocate when it comes to unpopular topics.
I just think...this movie seems to be attempting to make the commercial exploitation of children look hip and cool. And I don't like that at all.
And since I didn't watch this movie, I hold out the possibility that I may be wrong.
Fully agree Matty
-
If there is anything you think I'm missing here, rocket, let me know. I realize you have the contrarian [I would even say the UNDERDOG] position here, and I respect people who have the balls to play devil's advocate when it comes to unpopular topics.
I'm all for the witch hunt. I just want it to be righteous. I want my good and evil clearly defined.
I would have not posted much if you'd have said "promoting", I still find that to be opinion based, but it does "promote" thoughts of that nature in individuals, so I'm okay with that.
I think we're all suffering from bullshit witch hunts, thesedays. A lot of people on this board complain about all sorts of things being pushed on them (same sex preference, tolerance etc) and over inflated - yet the moment someone says something contrary to what they want to believe, they bitch up and pull the same shit that is being pulled on them to bully them into other people's agendas.
And it's mostly this insidious facebook image shit that is often made up or exaggerated.
I'm not in any way a contrarian - I'm a refereearian. Give me your best arguments and I'll listen. :)
As for the movie, the wiki page is a little more enlightening:
She penned the script for her debut feature film Cuties in early 2017 taking her life experience as a refugee girl into account. The script eventually won the Sundance's Global Filmmaking Award in 2017.[6] The film is based on a traditional Senegalese Muslim girl who is caught and torn between two contrasting fortunes, traditional values and internet culture while also speaking about hyper sexualization of pre-adolescent girls.[7][8] It premiered in the World Cinema Dramatic Competition sector of 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January 2020 and won the Directing Jury Award praising the script of the film.[9][10]
Pretty sure it isn't going to be normalising pedophiles or not speaking out about it. If I were netflix, I'd have probably just not gone there. I see now that the title is ironic, but really, that's still a bit too far.
-
(https://i56.photozi.com/images/5BiwK.png) (https://www.photozi.com/image/5BiwK)
Well...lol...I actually DID try reading that, especially when I noticed some keywords ["Venus", as in The Venus Project, "Jacque", as in Jacque Fresco, who was involved in the creation of the movement, and "Zeitgeist", which referred to the moronic "Zeitgeist" serious of movies from the late 2000's up to the 2010's, which basically attempted to re-brand communism as communism with robots, and didn't expect anyone to point out that the moronic Italian Peter Joseph Merola, who changed his name to Peter Joseph {sort of how Jews change their names when they endorse ideas that are murderous or otherwise destroy White societies} was simply trying to reintroduce communism].
I think it's safe to say that he got enough death threats over that one to remove the Zeitgeist movies from the internet to a pretty large extent. He doesn't have the presence he once did, and I think he voluntarily removed his own work, because it is much harder to find than it was 7-10 years ago.
I would have read that whole body of text, if it wasn't so small that it was hard to read! Lol!
But point taken - I NEED to stop typing so much. :-\ >:(
-
Fully agree Matty
Thanks Kwon! As a fellow racist, Islamophobic, Neo-Nazi, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, I can always expect you to stand up for certain principles that I can't expect my liberal and leftist friends to stand up for.
Like, you know, FUCKING CHILDREN.
So thank you for that. There are days where I feel like I am the insane one for being against pedophilia or the normalization of pedophilia.
Also, check out the updated Like to Dislike ratio on YouTube for the trailer of the Netflix Cuties movie, LOL!!!!
-
I'm all for the witch hunt. I just want it to be righteous. I want my good and evil clearly defined.
I would have not posted much if you'd have said "promoting", I still find that to be opinion based, but it does "promote" thoughts of that nature in individuals, so I'm okay with that.
I think we're all suffering from bullshit witch hunts, thesedays. A lot of people on this board complain about all sorts of things being pushed on them (same sex preference, tolerance etc) and over inflated - yet the moment someone says something contrary to what they want to believe, they bitch up and pull the same shit that is being pulled on them to bully them into other people's agendas.
And it's mostly this insidious facebook image shit that is often made up or exaggerated.
I'm not in any way a contrarian - I'm a refereearian. Give me your best arguments and I'll listen. :)
As for the movie, the wiki page is a little more enlightening:
She penned the script for her debut feature film Cuties in early 2017 taking her life experience as a refugee girl into account. The script eventually won the Sundance's Global Filmmaking Award in 2017.[6] The film is based on a traditional Senegalese Muslim girl who is caught and torn between two contrasting fortunes, traditional values and internet culture while also speaking about hyper sexualization of pre-adolescent girls.[7][8] It premiered in the World Cinema Dramatic Competition sector of 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January 2020 and won the Directing Jury Award praising the script of the film.[9][10]
Pretty sure it isn't going to be normalising pedophiles or not speaking out about it. If I were netflix, I'd have probably just not gone there. I see now that the title is ironic, but really, that's still a bit too far.
Yes rocket...yes, they do. But...
I think there is a difference between Roseanne being canceled for making a joke on Tweet deemed by a minority of social justice freaks when the premiere episode of her series reboot had 18 MILLION viewers [I think 27 MILLION if you include those who watched repeats on streaming services].
Cancel Culture people are cancelling things on the basis of ideology that 90% of people WANT to see, and operating based on cancel ideologies that the average person DESPISES.
Boycotts are another matter, as boycotts are voluntarily. It doesn't stop the producer from producing anything unless ACTUAL DEMAND for that product or service drops.
Roseanne's reboot was the most popular show on TV in the SIX YEARS prior to it being rebooted. People WANTED to see it. But I think when corporations realized that a show supporting Trump was going to become the most popular show on the internet, they wanted a way to cancel her that some - dumb or naive - people may think is justifiable.
But it's pushing cancel culture to joke levels like that, that is ultimately backfiring on these assholes.
I am perfectly ok with a voluntary boycott against Netflix for the three freakshow documentaries/movies they have produced so far that made me sick [the disgusting Rocci Siffredi documentary, glorifying that pervert, the documentary on the Peeping Tom who ran a motel, with NO ONE taking a strong stance against what he did, and that made sure to let viewers know that it is hard to charge Peeping Toms, due to statutes of limitations, and lastly - this "Cuties" movie, that features 11-year-old girls being sexually exploited, but can only be watched by viewers age 17 and older].
Voluntary boycotts and cancel culture minorities cancelling shows and products that were commercially viable that the overwhelming MAJORITY of people had no problem with are not the same thing.
Netflix will carry on, despite my never giving them any money ever again...and these boycotts will only work if enough people agree that Netflix is disgusting, and worthy of a boycott.
rocket, I think YOU are smart enough to know the difference between voluntary cooperation between adults and sexual matters reserved for consenting adults versus issues involving children. Along the same line, I think you also understand the difference between public lynchings that represent the interests of only a minority of frustrated people who push their ideology and morals on the majority of the people who have no issues with what the minority of complainers take issue with.
Don't get me wrong - I see your points. But I just think if we add just a wee bit more nuance to the nuance you have already applied to your thought process, that maybe there is yet another line to be drawn in the sand here.
I mean...a movie about sexuality or even just modeling that involves 11-year-old girls, but is restricted viewing to anyone under the age of 17? It just seems strange to me.
Britney Spears' Instagram posts also seem strange to me, and - off-topic here - but I would like to get your views on that, at some point. :) ;D
-
The "concession" Netflix made to its detractors was changing the movie's description on Netflix. Netflix 'strawmanned' the outrage to be about the description blurb. They changed it, "problem solved".
On the left of the image below is the original Cuties description. On the right, its revision.
The description originally said: "Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family's traditions.
Everyone knows what twerking represents. Here is Merriam-Webster's definition:
Definition of twerking:
sexually suggestive dancing characterized by rapid, repeated hip thrusts and shaking of the buttocks especially while squatting
… twerking has become a catch-all for an overtly sexualized style of dancing wherein one manipulates the hips and posterior in an often hypnotic and physics-defying bounce.
Keep in mind they are 11 year olds.
"Cuties" is nowhere near the only show in the entertainment industry's sexualization of children trend.
(https://i.postimg.cc/g0JS5Jjp/Ef1g-FYJWk-AEb4-Vo.jpg)
-
The "concession" Netflix made to its detractors was changing the movie's description on Netflix. Netflix 'strawmanned' the outrage to be about the description blurb. They changed it, "problem solved".
On the left of the image below is the original Cuties description. On the right, its revision.
The description originally said: "Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family's traditions.
Everyone knows what twerking represents. Here is Merriam-Webster's definition:
Definition of twerking:
sexually suggestive dancing characterized by rapid, repeated hip thrusts and shaking of the buttocks especially while squatting
… twerking has become a catch-all for an overtly sexualized style of dancing wherein one manipulates the hips and posterior in an often hypnotic and physics-defying bounce.
Keep in mind they are 11 year olds.
"Cuties" is nowhere near the only show in the entertainment industry's sexualization of children trend.
(https://i.postimg.cc/g0JS5Jjp/Ef1g-FYJWk-AEb4-Vo.jpg)
^^This pretty much sums up this shitshow....enough said!...
(https://i19.photozi.com/images/9WbmC.jpg) (https://www.photozi.com/image/9WbmC)
-
^^This pretty much sums up this shitshow....enough said!...
(https://i19.photozi.com/images/9WbmC.jpg) (https://www.photozi.com/image/9WbmC)
[1] It's not over until the fat lady sings, AND:
[2] It's not over until I see the YouTube trailer for this shitshow hit a 30K Like to 1M Dislike ratio.
;D
-
The "concession" Netflix made to its detractors was changing the movie's description on Netflix. Netflix 'strawmanned' the outrage to be about the description blurb. They changed it, "problem solved".
On the left of the image below is the original Cuties description. On the right, its revision.
The description originally said: "Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family's traditions.
Everyone knows what twerking represents. Here is Merriam-Webster's definition:
Definition of twerking:
sexually suggestive dancing characterized by rapid, repeated hip thrusts and shaking of the buttocks especially while squatting
… twerking has become a catch-all for an overtly sexualized style of dancing wherein one manipulates the hips and posterior in an often hypnotic and physics-defying bounce.
Keep in mind they are 11 year olds.
"Cuties" is nowhere near the only show in the entertainment industry's sexualization of children trend.
(https://i.postimg.cc/g0JS5Jjp/Ef1g-FYJWk-AEb4-Vo.jpg)
They're also trying to paint conservative familyvalues badly.
Such turds they are, liberal filt.
-
Don't get me wrong - I see your points. But I just think if we add just a wee bit more nuance to the nuance you have already applied to your thought process, that maybe there is yet another line to be drawn in the sand here.
Britney Spears' Instagram posts also seem strange to me, and - off-topic here - but I would like to get your views on that, at some point. :) ;D
She looks to be struggling quite a bit with now unfulfilled self worth. Add in a bit of mania due to covid quarantine. I feel sorry for her.
It is never a good idea for a woman to use very heavy eyeliner and have messy hair. You look batshit crazy. She would be better off with no makeup if she is going to do that but the self worth thing kicks in.
-
They're also trying to paint conservative familyvalues badly.
Such turds they are, liberal filt.
They always portray the nuclear family as dysfunctional. Almost every movie I've seen recently has subtle and not so subtle images of conservatives, Christians, or just normal people as messed up and hiding it. Example: a serial killer with a crucifix on his wall, or a rapist who goes to church right afterwards. The truth is that the left is projecting. Example: Weinstein and Epstein.
-
That's a very persuasive retort. I'll need some time to really digest it and sort through the nuance and complexity of it all.
It's strange, but I feel like I've heard that argument before somewhere. Hmmm. Oh yeah, in third grade.
I kept it short just for you. Didn't want you to strain yourself.
-
I hope you’re joking. If not then you might be suffering from mental illness. Look at the most conservative groups in this country. The Church. They are a treasure trove of pedophiles.
Yep, but let's all ignore that little fact ok?
-
Yep, but let's all ignore that little fact ok?
Yeah, it's not like we've been talking about pedophilia in The Catholic Church incessantly for at least 30 years now or anything like that.
-
I kept it short just for you. Didn't want you to strain yourself.
You kept it short.......like your cock.
-
You kept it short.......like your cock.
So you are letting us know you are just a size queen? Ok. Being queer isn't a stigma like it used to be.
-
So you are letting us know you are just a size queen? Ok. Being queer isn't a stigma like it used to be.
Unfortunately for you, there still is a stigma around guys with tiny dicks.
Don't worry, you can just tell everyone that you are a lesbian with an enlarged clit.
(http://clv.h-cdn.co/assets/17/30/little-smokies.jpg)
-
(https://scontent.farn2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/118345932_10157736619617781_874728262348147893_o.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=ysJX93zc70kAX_5USCl&_nc_ht=scontent.farn2-1.fna&oh=2e25672417a685362fde6331a8e291b7&oe=5F678753)
-
Agenda of peace.
-
Unfortunately for you, there still is a stigma around guys with tiny dicks.
Don't worry, you can just tell everyone that you are a lesbian with an enlarged clit.
(http://clv.h-cdn.co/assets/17/30/little-smokies.jpg)
And with your continued interest, you can just tell everyone you are a fag. Though they probably already know.
I'd rather be straight with a little dick than a cock sucking queer lusting after big ones.
-
[1] It's not over until the fat lady sings, AND:
[2] It's not over until I see the YouTube trailer for this shitshow hit a 30K Like to 1M Dislike ratio.
;D
Here's the ratio part: :D
(https://i.postimg.cc/fL5vs8hV/net.jpg)
-
Yeah, it's not like we've been talking about pedophilia in The Catholic Church Primemuscle’s home incessantly for at least 30 years now or anything like that.
-
(https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/300x300/84929799.jpg)
-
(https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/300x300/84929799.jpg)
That's a good point. It's obvious none of these "protesters" have jobs unless they have 3 months vacation stored up.
-
Here's the ratio part: :D
(https://i.postimg.cc/fL5vs8hV/net.jpg)
It's 1.2M now.
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ted-cruz-calls-for-doj-investigation-into-netflix-promotion-of-cuties
-
Crazy times we live in
-
Why would anyone admit to paying for or watching Netflix?????
Netflix wants people to know that over 50% of their content is not pedo related.
(https://i.postimg.cc/mgzdLKVy/article-6987-2.jpg)
Below: So, if you are pro-pedo, you are shaking up the "patriarchal order".... They've got enough idiots convinced that the "patriarchal order" is bad. That's two levels of brainwashing, one level they've already accomplished in order to open the door to the other level that they're starting to seriously work on.
(https://i.postimg.cc/m2N9QjkW/Ehk-Njsp-Wk-AAv-B.jpg)
Who the New Yorker put in charge of telling the masses how to think about cinema propaganda:
The same ilk that make the propaganda have news agencies who hire like-minded scum to tell you how to think about it. Maybe soon they can plant chips in people's heads.
(https://i.postimg.cc/gkZxDD02/Brody-Jacket-photo.jpg)
-
I just saw the trailer. At 0:43 she tells the black little girl "You're a woman now". This is outrageous.
A movie like that should not be out but politicians won't act because maybe they like it. In 10years maybe they'll make it normal.
-
I just saw the trailer. At 0:43 she tells the black little girl "You're a woman now". This is outrageous.
A movie like that should not be out but politicians won't act because maybe they like it. In 10years maybe they'll make it normal.
Ugh.
I loaded up the video again, in order to see the Like to Dislike ratio. I accidentally let the video play in the background while I was opening up MS Paint to get the screen capture below, and I'm so annoyed with myself. I don't even want to watch the trailer for this piece of shit - and the more I hear about it, the more I think that way. Talk about disgusting.
-
This is probably tied in with the people and groups associated with Epstein.
It does seem like these people are trying to influence things behind the scenes, that there is a campaign to 'normalise' this and make it 'acceptable'.
-
This is probably tied in with the people and groups associated with Epstein.
It does seem like these people are trying to influence things behind the scenes, that there is a campaign to 'normalise' this and make it 'acceptable'.
This has been the goal of LGBTQ from the start.
-
Im only interested in 18 year old pussy bra
-
Im only interested in 18 year old pussy bra
Not 19 or 20?
-
Scandalous Obozo profiting from this outrageous perv-shit.
-
I would have to study the per-capita rates of pedophilia in the church, in order to evaluate the merits of your claim. I'm slightly more concerned with rabbis who genitally mutilate Jewish babies, but - if you pressed me - I agree with you that it appears to be the case that The Catholic Church has an above average rate of pedophilia.
Do you have any evidence that the Catholic church has an above average rate of pedophilia, i.e., sex with PREpubescent children? All the accounts I have read was with Priest having sex with teenage boys. And just to make it crystal clear, this is not to condone having sex with teenagers. This is wrong and the reason why I left the Catholic church despite being born and baptised a Catholic and a practicing Catholic for decades.
There is a huge difference between an adult having sex with a 15 year old and having sex with a six year old.
-
Do you have any evidence that the Catholic church has an above average rate of pedophilia, i.e., sex with PREpubescent children? All the accounts I have read was with Priest having sex with teenage boys. And just to make it crystal clear, this is not to condone having sex with teenagers. This is wrong and the reason why I left the Catholic church despite being born and baptised a Catholic and a practicing Catholic for decades.
There is a huge difference between an adult having sex with a 15 year old and having sex with a six year old.
Which church do you attend now? Lutheran? Orthodox?
-
Why would anyone admit to paying for or watching Netflix?????
Netflix wants people to know that over 50% of their content is not pedo related.
(https://i.postimg.cc/mgzdLKVy/article-6987-2.jpg)
Below: So, if you are pro-pedo, you are shaking up the "patriarchal order".... They've got enough idiots convinced that the "patriarchal order" is bad. That's two levels of brainwashing, one level they've already accomplished in order to open the door to the other level that they're starting to seriously work on.
(https://i.postimg.cc/m2N9QjkW/Ehk-Njsp-Wk-AAv-B.jpg)
Who the New Yorker put in charge of telling the masses how to think about cinema propaganda:
The same ilk that make the propaganda have news agencies who hire like-minded scum to tell you how to think about it. Maybe soon they can plant chips in people's heads.
(https://i.postimg.cc/gkZxDD02/Brody-Jacket-photo.jpg)
You do realize that’s not a real tweet...
...and that people who re-post Onion and Babylon Bee stories without using common sense occupy the bottom echelon of intelligence.
-
???
-
You do realize that’s not a real tweet...
...and that people who re-post Onion and Babylon Bee stories without using common sense occupy the bottom echelon of intelligence.
I hope you're not one of those average IQ fellows that fact-check satire and feel like they're brilliant for pointing out that a comical meme or a satire article is fake news.
It comes across like the annoying kid raising his hand in class to show everyone how "smart" he is.
We know. We know. Babylon Bee is fake. Thanks for catching up.
https://babylonbee.com/news/netflix-responds-to-backlash-clarifies-its-content-is-mostly-not-pedophilia (https://babylonbee.com/news/netflix-responds-to-backlash-clarifies-its-content-is-mostly-not-pedophilia)
(https://i.postimg.cc/6QFpgNfm/c5cea973f5efc10b0e2682aced771fb0.jpg)
-
:o
-
This has been the goal of LGBTQ from the start.
I have said this for years. Trump can slow it down, but nothing short of a cultural revolution can stop it.
I will give you all a hint, the solution starts like this- its OK not to like other people. The reason doesnt matter, for sake of the argument, the underlying point is that this concept you have to be either conservative and dislike progressives are the polar opposite with no middle ground is divisive and not logical. It doesnt work. What does is a simple concept- i might not like you but i will respect your right to live as happily as you can provided you do not infringe on my right to do the same. Very simple. This forced acceptance of anyone and everyone is fascist and by design is leading this nation to destruction.
-
Ugh.
I loaded up the video again, in order to see the Like to Dislike ratio. I accidentally let the video play in the background while I was opening up MS Paint to get the screen capture below, and I'm so annoyed with myself. I don't even want to watch the trailer for this piece of shit - and the more I hear about it, the more I think that way. Talk about disgusting.
With so many people speaking up against the show, why would netflix defy business logic and continue to air the show? Could it be that by airing the show netflix is promoting a certain agenda? Pushing an idea to the forefront that this type of behaviour is acceptable?
-
With so many people speaking up against the show, why would netflix defy business logic and continue to air the show? Could it be that by airing the show netflix is promoting a certain agenda? Pushing an idea to the forefront that this type of behaviour is acceptable?
They are a libtard owned/libtard programmed media outlet, relying on fruitcakes to move their agenda FWD. They pay Obozo millions (for who knows what) and have all sorts of retarded programming.
Like HULU, etc.
Hollyweird ::)
-
They are a libtard owned/libtard programmed media outlet, relying on fruitcakes to move their agenda FWD. They pay Obozo millions (for who knows what) and have all sorts of retarded programming.
Like HULU, etc.
Hollyweird ::)
Hollywood has proven they are willing to take financial losses to push their agenda forward, thus all the SJW woke movies.
-
Netflix Indicted in Texas for ‘Lewd’ Content in ‘Cuties’:
A Texas grand jury has indicted Netflix on a charge of disseminating lewd material by distributing the French film “Cuties.”
The grand jury in Tyler County, Texas, returned the indictment on Sept. 23 under a state law that forbids “the lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of an unclothed, partially clothed, or clothed child.”
To be illegal, such material must appeal “to the prurient interest in sex” and have “no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”
https://variety.com/2020/film/news/netflix-cuties-lewd-content-indictment-1234794699
-
-
The most important thing for people to do is cancel Netflix and wean themselves off systems of control like the entertainment industry and sports. And if one's struggling emotionally with quitting sports and/or tv/movie ogling, at the very least find a way to get it for free. If you're funding them, you're part of the problem.
The industry is never going to change and they should never be forgiven for the agendas that they eventually worked up to blatantly revealing and propagandizing.
And "Cuties" is just the feces on the cake and the above would apply even if "Cuties" had stayed a glimmer in the pedo director's eye.
(https://i.postimg.cc/3RgrdXwB/Ejq-M3-FGXYAEXj-Zc.jpg)
-
Good for Texas. Its about time someone drew a line in the sand.
Next time around cuties will be gay/transgender (im assuming this one isnt.)
-