Cuties Film - Netflix Endorsing Pedophilia - Discuss

[King Shizzo]

She probably has a dick.

Judging by the chin hair....

[hardgainerj]

Why would any toy company be selling.....

"A children's doll that reveals provocative outfits when dipped into cold water has prompted anger and calls for it to be removed from shelves."

""Who the f**k thinks it's okay to put a hidden message on a little girl's doll that's got tape around her privates that says 'caution' and have shackles on her hands?"


ABC news:


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-19/outrage-builds-over-sexualised-lol-surprise-kids-dolls/12572752






The Toy Company owner Isaass Larian:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Larian

[Humble Narcissist]

Whenever I see men obsessed with children, especially single men, my red flag goes up.  Single men with no children usually don't want to be anywhere around them.

[hardgainerj]

I'm reminded of the amazing Getbig thread about the disgusting documentary "Rocco".  There was another documentary that glorified some Peeping Tom, who was peeping on couples who went to a motel that he owned.  Absolutely disgusting.

the producer

https://variety.com/2020/film/global/zangro-sundance-cuties-1203467120/

http://clermont-filmfest.com/02_marche/01_catalogue/commun/part2.pdf

[Pray_4_War]

speaking of which did your triune God condemn or condone Lot fucking his daughters

Oh, you're one of those.

[hardgainerj]

Palling around with Epstein?  That would be Bill Clinton and not Trump.  If there was a Trump connection to Epstein, it would be all over the news.  Clinton is the one spotted on the island and the one with the numerous flights on Epstein's plane.  Pedo is a total left wing problem.  Epstein, big democratic donor.

https://www.amny.com/news/village-district-leaders-son-gets-1-to-3-years-for-child-porn/ Deblasio staffer
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/democratic-donor-ed-buck-faces-additional-charges-linked-overdose-deaths-n1235840
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/nyregion/anthony-weiner-prison-release.html

Not even going to get into what a creep John Podesta is.

https://californiaglobe.com/legislature/ca-democrats-author-bill-to-protect-sex-offenders-who-lure-minors/  Protecting their own!

clintons, epstein, Maxwell. All trump associate, did you forget lyin ted brought up trumps Association with liberals at the debates?

[hardgainerj]

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

[hardgainerj]

Oh, you're one of those.

well did he?

And btw I acknowledge the Arab schizo was involved with a 9 yr old which according to his deluded followers that was ok

[hardgainerj]

Weiner

Hoffman

typical wasp name

[joswift]

"Yes. You're retarted retarded"

fixed

[LurkerNoMore]

You are (intentionally) missing the point.  We have hard evidence that Bill Clinton was on Epstein's airplane, the so-called Lolita Express.  Flight logs of him going to the so-called pedo-island.  Now there are photographs of him with one of the girls.  Then there is the eye witness testimony from an alleged victim.

You ignore all of that and instead focus on a flimsy connection with Trump even though by all accounts he had nothing to do with any of that.  Imbecile.

 

Yeah right.

[Pray_4_War]

well did he?

And btw I acknowledge the Arab schizo was involved with a 9 yr old which according to his deluded followers that was ok

There are many Christians that are eager to try to win people like you over through religious debate.  I'm not one of them.  Pick your team and let the chips fall where they may.

[Pray_4_War]

Yeah right.

That's a very persuasive retort.  I'll need some time to really digest it and sort through the nuance and complexity of it all.

It's strange, but I feel like I've heard that argument before somewhere.  Hmmm.  Oh yeah, in third grade.

[Matt]

Come on Matt, you're more intelligent than that bullshit title. 

Whilst the sexualisation of children is certainly something that shouldn't happen - it also true that having the sexualisation of children on your service does NOT mean you're "endorsing" pedophillia.  Same as having John Wick on your service doesn't mean you're endorsing murder.  Same as having all manner of fucked up things on there does.  I don't see many people complaining along the same lines when Oldboy is on there and boy is that a ride.

I expect this to go way over a number of heads, here - but I think you're intelligent enough to understand what I'm saying.  We don't need to sensationalise everything beyond the realm of truth.

Regardless of whether there is a film about children dressing provocatively, it is still at the hands of the depraved individuals watching it to commit the crimes associated with it.

Should the film exist?  Probably not.  Should it be on netflix?  Seems like a foolish move.

But the fact is, if you're feeling a stirring in your fucking pants from watching that shit, it's not netflix's fault, it's your own.  Netflix didn't endorse your pedophillia.

Edit:  I hadn't actually watch the trailer - it's actually the name that is the worst part of it.  It just gives it the worst light.  If it had been named "generic kids dance movie", it would have probably snuck through.

I didn't watch it - I won't watch it.  I didn't even actively search for videos on MGTOW or dating when I initially happened into the "Better Bachelor" channel, who made the video in the OP - a video which is not part of his usual content either.  His content is generally about how feminism has made women so entitled that it makes dating them impossible.

My girlfriend dumped me about two weeks ago, and I think is a possibility that my computer has been reading my texts to her, and gave me dating content, but I didn't actively search for it.

epic is back made a post above about a "weekend warrior channel" on YouTube, so I went to search for "weekend warrior Netflix" to see if there is a channel by anyone with the name Weekend Warrior who made a channel on this documentary.

I don't even want to search for the "Netflix Cuties" on YouTube, because I don't want my IP address associated with pedophilia!

And how about this rocket:

Do you know what movie I've watched AT LEAST 35 times in my life?

"Last House on the Left".  And not the updated 2009 milder version - but the 1972 brutal rape and murder version.

Why?  Because it was given 0 stars by a film critic who wrote a book of capsule reviews similar to Leonard Maltin's film guide.  He even wrote that by giving it 0 stars [with the lowest ranking being half a star], that it was the lowest ranked movie in his book.  I just spent the past 27 minutes online trying to figure out his name.  He passed away in 2004 at the age of 88, but I can't even seem to find evidence of his existence.

Then I found out that Roger Ebert gave the original "Last House on the Left" 3.5 stars out of 4.

In light of the above facts, watching the movie originally made sense...as for the dozens of times I watched it since - the reason for that was because I like the musical score of the movie, the Ironage cinematography, and some of the good characters - the parents in particular.

But I always either physically skip over the rape scene [sometimes] or, more likely, phase out, go on my laptop, and watch Getbig.

I would question the mental state of anyone who pauses the movie during the rape scene to masturbate to it.

I basically lost respect for women on the whole when I realized how popular "Fifty Shades of Grey" was.  We basically spent our entire lives as men being told that men were awful sexist rapists, and meanwhile, women line up in mass numbers to masturbate publicly to Fifty Shades of Grey.  I will go so far as to say, I lost respect for women on the whole when I realized how popular BDSM was with them, and that respect has never come back.

But here's the thing about the Netflix movie "Cuties", rocket [correct me if I'm wrong, because I didn't, and will NOT watch this filth]: this movie is NOT a work of fiction!  And that really says it all, doesn't it?  If it was a fictional movie, I would still have some concern for there being real child actors working on the movie, but I could handle a fictionalized account.  I could also handle an exposé style movie that covers the sickos who want to see CHILDREN stripping for money.  But a movie that NORMALIZES this sort of behaviour?

Do you really not get that I don't want ATTRACTION TO CHILDREN being made to look sexy or cool or normal in any way?

Just tell me this is an exposé style movie on pedophiles, and I'll retract this post.

[Matt]

Come on guys.  I really wish some of you would actually check your shit before posting

That article doesn't exist

In fact, it is a doctored version of this article to make dickheads pass it around, without actually checking it.  Yet more sensationalism.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/

"Homophobes Might Be Hidden Homosexuals"

Not.. ARE.  Not anything to do with pedophiles.

I don't give a fuck if you're left or right.  If you're going to say some shit, just do a basic search. 

No scientific paper is going to ever make an absolute statement (ie, use the language ARE) based on statistical analysis.   Hence the language "might" in the real paper.

Just so you know, I did do a search for that article, and I couldn't find it.  But I searched for it EXPECTING to find it.  I always track down primary sources, and I had no reason to think that one didn't exist.  I searched for it, and couldn't find it - but pedophile promoters have also been removing articles they write, once they realize that, you know, they get 12,000 thumbs up and 383,000 thumbs down.

I'm the first to take a contrarian position that is logical, rocket.  But you seem to be telling me that I should appreciate a video that normalizes pedophilia.

Netflix had that disgusting "Rocco" documentary, to make the life of that pervert look stylized and artistic, and also had a documentary about a Peeping Tom which, AT NO POINT, had the view of a person saying that anyone who does that is a sick fuck who should be brought out back and shot.

And THAT is the problem I have with Netflix doing this - they are not making these perverts [Rocco being an exception, IMO, because he WAS engaging in consensual activity with other adults] aware of the fact that people would kill them if they were exposed, and that is exactly the sort of attitude that, as I said above, NORMALIZES their behaviour.

That is not a good thing - it is disgusting, and I consider this tantamount to an implicit endorsement of pedophilia.

People ask me if I have White Nationalist leanings.  And the answer is  - FUCKING OF COURSE I DO.  WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T I?  I'M A WHITE MAN, FOR FUCK'S SAKE.  Am I supposed to be like everyone else and sit around and suck the dicks of people flooding into White countries to replace us?  FUCK THAT.

But I do my friends AND my enemies a favour by exposing myself.  What I am disgusted about with Netflix is the fact that they are operating in stealth manner here.  Not stealth enough for people not to be disgusted with them, but ultimately, Netflix is taking REAL female CHILDREN and showing examples of them being exploited for money [again, I DID NOT AND WILL NOT WATCH THIS FILTH, so if I'm wrong about this, let me know].

Since 2013, after the trans stuff tried and failed to become mainstream, I've seen articles every year with titles like "The Surprising Number of Straight Men who are Trying Sex with Men."

 

Apparently because bisexuality doesn't exist to these morons.

And there are consistently articles written that attempt to normalize pedophilia.  Here is an example from the NEW YORK TIMES:

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html

This one shows you that people are pushing back on this:

https://www.metroweekly.com/2018/07/tedx-speaker-argues-that-pedophilia-should-be-accepted-as-an-unchangeable-sexual-orientation

Also, let me take this back a step - at age 18, despite being BRAINWASHED AT EVERY TURN to accept gay marriage, I still took issue with it.  I took issue with it in the same way I would take issue with a non-Jew demanding he be allowed to have a Bar Mitzvah.  If gays wanted "civil unions", FINE.  But who the hell are gays to demand that a church tradition be granted to them?

I NEVER tolerated this slippery slope of anti-Christian/anti-Western values.

I was speaking out against "diversity" [meaning, White people being replaced by non-Whites in the societies where White people were the majority in the 20th century] since at least 2007, AND I WAS SPEAKING ABOUT IT USING MY REAL NAME.

But now - now things have gone so batshit to the left, that even my liberal friends are ready to vote in Trump.

Shit, they will be ready to vote in Hitler if things keep going in this direction.

[Mr Anabolic]

fixed

I just copied and pasted Rocket's profile avatar phrase to prove he's a typical libtard moron.

[Matt]

I just copied and pasted Rocket's profile avatar phrase to prove he's a typical libtard moron.

I was rather saddened to see rocket's post on the matter.  I admit - I haven't watched this documentary, so maybe I'm wrong.  But this is a movie about 11-year-old girls that is restricted to audiences aged 17 or older.

If I'm missing something here, please let me know.

[Matt]

So you're all blaming liberals yet who is the president and who is running this country?  Make up your fucking minds.

If you are saying that an entire political party can't be blamed for this, I agree with you.

But it is safe to say that all of the perverts and freaks are on the Democrat side.  98% of Netflix people [I assume that refers to investors, donors, creators, and other people close to Netflix, who basically make the decisions at Netflix] are Democrats.

Also, look at places like Baltimore - or really any Black ghetto in the USA - they have literally had Democrat governors for the past 50+ years, LOL.

I think it's safe to say the anti-American traditional values assholes have failed with their superior model.

Frankly, if I were a leftist, I would stop pushing it at this point, out of fear of another Hitler rising.

But...maybe that's where this stuff ultimately leads.

[Matt]

Slippery slope buddy. Sexualized kids in movies are sexualized kids regardless. Murdered John wick henchman are not actually murdered.

I recognize nuance in debates but when it comes to overtly sexualizing kids and pedohilia, its a hard line and thats the way it should be.

I didn't realize that rocket was some phaggot university pseudo-intellectual.

I don't think he is.  So I'm just going to keep reading the thread until I have evidence one way or another.

Regarding the slippery slope, my way to deal with the cocksuckers who say "But WHY is 18 years old the legal age?  Why can't it be 17 years and 360 days?!?!  Are you saying a 17 year old can't drink alcohol on the even of their 18th birthday?"

Frankly, I'm at a point where I know there is at least a 5% chance that I murder one of these assholes within my lifetime.

We set rules in place for a reason.  Those rules are subjectively objective.

The-17-year old drinking before his 18th birthday will be punished.  Luckily for him or her, the same rules in place that make it illegal to drink before 18 also make it so that he will get a reduced penalty for violating the law while under the age of 18.

I set objective standards in place.  For example, I am going to allow myself one cigarette per calendar week in the future moving forward [I'm a nonsmoker, but I was smoking cigarettes a bit this year].  Someone could easily say "But why not allow yourself TWO cigarettes a week?"

My response to them is "I've decided on one", and if they push the matter, I would say "Say that one more fucking time, and my hand goes in the air.  Then if you don't apologize for it, I'm giving you a massive open-hand slap to the ground."

I'm not going down a slippery slope.  I set objective lines in the sand to follow, and I follow them.

Everyone does - I'm just, as always, doing these things explicitly.

[El Diablo Blanco]

I didn't realize that rocket was some phaggot university pseudo-intellectual.

I don't think he is.  So I'm just going to keep reading the thread until I have evidence one way or another.

Regarding the slippery slope, my way to deal with the cocksuckers who say "But WHY is 18 years old the legal age?  Why can't it be 17 years and 360 days?!?!  Are you saying a 17 year old can't drink alcohol on the even of their 18th birthday?"

Frankly, I'm at a point where I know there is at least a 5% chance that I murder one of these assholes within my lifetime.

We set rules in place for a reason.  Those rules are subjectively objective.

The-17-year old drinking before his 18th birthday will be punished.  Luckily for him or her, the same rules in place that make it illegal to drink before 18 also make it so that he will get a reduced penalty for violating the law while under the age of 18.

I set objective standards in place.  For example, I am going to allow myself one cigarette per calendar week in the future moving forward [I'm a nonsmoker, but I was smoking cigarettes a bit this year].  Someone could easily say "But why not allow yourself TWO cigarettes a week?"

My response to them is "I've decided on one", and if they push the matter, I would say "Say that one more fucking time, and my hand goes in the air.  Then if you don't apologize for it, I'm giving you a massive open-hand slap to the ground."

I'm not going down a slippery slope.  I set objective lines in the sand to follow, and I follow them.

Everyone does - I'm just, as always, doing these things explicitly.

I hope you’re joking.  If not then you might be suffering from mental illness.  Look at the most conservative groups in this country. The Church.  They are a treasure trove of pedophiles.   

[bigkid]

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

That's all you have?  A video from 1992 and a quote where Trump compliments a wealthy new york society figure years before he was ever in any trouble?  I think everyone under the sun has a picture of Maxwell and themselves.    Was Trump on the Island?  Did he take 20+ trips on Epstein's plane like Clinton?  Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago in 2007 according to a member of Mar-a-lago and a Miami investigative reporter.

[Methyl m1ke]

Ive been saying this for years. On this board in fact.

[Megalodon]

Very recently: Hasbro toy gets recalled because the toy's designers thought it would be a good idea to put a button on the doll's crotch that oooohs and gasps when pressed.

Doesn't say anything about it on the box. Troll doll.

 
Nice try, Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner.

This is all in the context of the push for "P" to be added on to LGBTQ.....

Start at about 1:00:

So, Rolling Stone editor Jason Fine thought it would be a good idea to get EJ Dickson(Looks Like Gilda Radner below) to write an article smearing any parent that complained.

Parent's complaints have nothing to with 'Pizzagate" or "QAnon". Rolling Stone is gaslighting Black, Latino, Asian, and White mothers. And all races complain about the people who did this.

Rolling Stones Article: "You're all nuts for noticing there's a button on the doll's private areas that gasps when pressed"



"EJ Dickson" is the name the writer goes by.

[Matt]

I hope you’re joking.  If not then you might be suffering from mental illness.  Look at the most conservative groups in this country. The Church.  They are a treasure trove of pedophiles.

I would have to study the per-capita rates of pedophilia in the church, in order to evaluate the merits of your claim.  I'm slightly more concerned with rabbis who genitally mutilate Jewish babies, but - if you pressed me - I agree with you that it appears to be the case that The Catholic Church has an above average rate of pedophilia.

Which somewhat makes sense - if you force clergy to suppress natural sexual desires, is it really such a shock that you would have some of them pushing back against their religious programming by having sex with people unlikely to report them?

I'm NOT justifying it.  In fact, I'm agreeing with you that at the least, it seems to be a thing [IMO].  With all the Christian bashing out there, I'm skeptical, but...my mathematical spidey sense is tingling, and I think you are right.

But just a question for you - just because there is pedophilia in the church, how does that justify Netflix making movies that implicitly normalize pedophilia?  Also, do you have an answer to the question of why a movie about 11-year-old children is restricted to audiences over the age of 17?

I remember watching the 1995 movie "KIDS" when I was 13 when it came to The Movie Network [Canada's Ironage version of HBO]...and thinking how sick it was.  If that movie came out today, I would think "God, our culture is swirling around a toilet bowl!"  But here's the thing - the movie "KIDS" was a work of fiction!

Ugh, I feel like I need to watch this movie now before I make a judgment on it...and I REALLY don't want to do that.

PS: El Diablo Blanco - I would have assumed you were Catholic judging by your Spanish user name, but since you aren't, what do you make of The Pope's audience hall?  Have you seen it?  Also, are you from Latin America?  I ask you because I have a question about Latin America.  I apologize if my not knowing that offends you, although I don't know why that question would be offensive.

[rocket]

Do you really not get that I don't want ATTRACTION TO CHILDREN being made to look sexy or cool or normal in any way?

I think that it's more that you're not really getting me.   I'm tired of being clickbaited into shit.  Everywhere I look now, titles are downright bullshit.  Everybody has figured out that sort of 20% lying gets you more views, these days - and it's hard to read anything that is balanced.  When I read your name on the thread, I click on it because I'm not expecting that.

Netflix aren't endorsing pedophilia.  Endorsing means you actively support and encourage the practice.  They aren't endorsing anything on their service. 

They might be showing something that depicts it (in this case, they aren't) - or is a bit too borderline close to it (they are), but they aren't actually endorsing it.

As far as being against having that stuff, you be you.  I've got no complaints. 

I think you're preaching to the choir when you talk about being against pedophilia (a friend of mine's father is in jail for possession of material of that nature, AND the friend believes there may have been instances with young relatives.  This was a guy who was beating his wife, his kids throughout the time I knew him and meanwhile masquerading as a quirky cool guy when anybody like I was around, some evil shit).  Another friend's Dad is jail for raping him as a kid.  All this shit happening in a small circle of like 6 friends and I had no idea.  Neither of these guys gave any indication it was happening.  It's almost a fairytale to me.  I have to admit, I still don't fully believe them - because it's that much of a deviation from my own life, it's insane.

As for that article - I got suspicious by the wording because it is a paper on scientific american.  When I couldn't find it at all on google, I thought "was that so inflammatory, they deleted it?".  On a whim, I decided to search the author's name - and low and behold, the true one appeared.  It was a genius move by the troll who made that image, though.  It is certainly the type of shit that people would share first and ask questions.. well mostly never.

And I respect your choice to not watch it - the only reason I watched the trailer was because I wanted to make sure they weren't endorsing it.  As I said, it appears to be a kids move that looks to go too far with some of the dancing.  But really, the issue is that it is named ab-so-fucking-lutely heinously, ensuring that everybody who watches it has already basically been led down the sexualisation path.  Trust me, the person who named that and made the posters started this shit.   They might as well have called it "sluts".  I haven't seen really any dancing movies, so I don't know what the line is, but my guess is, if you call something "cuties" and then have young girls doing crotch thrusts, you're fucked