Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on November 25, 2020, 01:36:13 PM
-
Nevada Judge Agrees to Hear Evidence of Alleged Voter Fraud
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/nevada-judge-agrees-to-hear-evidence-of-alleged-voter-fraud_3592872.html
Download our app to read more for free at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
-
Cool story coach.
Thanks for the breaking news updates as always.
-
Yes it's fun watching Giuliani running around like a chicken with it's head cut off filing these doomed motions. Gotta love the bargain basement hair color dropping down his old wrinkly forehead
LMFAO
But he has a better life than you. Fame, money, power, women....Lmao
-
But he has a better life than you. Fame, money, power, women....Lmao
Yes, that must be it
-
Oh great. Now we all can watch Trump lose AGAIN! Love these responses for when the lawsuit is thrown out.
-
Oh great. Now we all can watch Trump lose AGAIN! Love these responses for when the lawsuit is thrown out.
We’ll see. Getting flat out turned down from Obama appointed judges is a little different that having a judge allow to present evidence and witness testimony
-
But I’m sure you missed this from today
https://rumble.com/vberbr-pa-witness-claims-suspicious-ballot-dump-gave-biden-570k-votes-trump-just-3.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab
-
When it is thrown out again... what's your excuse going to be then. Just go ahead and tell us now. Why wait? The outcome will be the same.
-
When it is thrown out again... what's your excuse going to be then. Just go ahead and tell us now. Why wait? The outcome will be the same.
Maybe maybe not. Apparently the Pennsylvania Supreme Court thinks they can write laws..
-
::)
-
We’ll see. Getting flat out turned down from Obama appointed judges is a little different that having a judge allow to present evidence and witness testimony
you mean the judge who is a conservative republican member of the Federalist society (you knew that...right?)
did you happen to read his statement (or have someone read it to you)
-
you mean the judge who is a conservative republican member of the Federalist society (you knew that...right?)
did you happen to read his statement (or have someone read it to you)
Yes, one that will actually do his job
-
Yes, one that will actually do his job
so you didn't actually read the judges ruling
do you even know what THE TRAITOR was alleging (hint - it wasn't fraud)
-
Oh great. Now we all can watch Trump lose AGAIN! Love these responses for when the lawsuit is thrown out.
Having a reactive mind is unhealthy
-
so you didn't actually read the judges ruling
do you even know what THE TRAITOR was alleging (hint - it wasn't fraud)
I absolutely did. You sound nervous...like your little Marxist world is about to collapse
-
The campaign also has testimony from a blind person who claims somebody else voted for her, and that she was barred from voting as a result.
One (1) vote....and only if that vote would have gone to Trump.
Trump's team have alleged voter fraud in at least 40 lawsuits and couldn't back it up. What's to say this time will be any different.
Even if Trump's team were to prevail in Nevada, Nevada's 6 electoral votes aren't even enough to make a tiny dent Biden's total win. It is an exercise in futility and a waste of the court's time.
-
The campaign also has testimony from a blind person who claims somebody else voted for her, and that she was barred from voting as a result.
One (1) vote....and only if that vote would have gone to Trump.
Trump's team have alleged voter fraud in at least 40 lawsuits and couldn't back it up. What's to say this time will be any different.
Even if Trump's team were to prevail in Nevada, Nevada's 6 electoral votes aren't even enough to make a tiny dent Biden's total win. It is an exercise in futility and a waste of the court's time.
You might want to take a look at Pennsylvania as well they just might overturn 600,000 ballots
-
You might want to take a look at Pennsylvania as well they just might overturn 600,000 ballots
Are all these votes for Biden?
-
Are all these votes for Biden?
According to the testimony all but like 3200
-
According to the testimony all but like 3200
Wow....didn't realize that.
Maybe it's not over yet.......
-
We’ll see. Getting flat out turned down from Obama appointed judges is a little different that having a judge allow to present evidence and witness testimony
Is that what's happening? I'm intrigued watching this...it's rather fascinating to me...so leftists aren't happy with the fact that we have a two-party system, and that due to mass immigration, from this point on we won't even have future Republican presidencies, but they want a straight up one-party system?
It blows my mind that judges - whose literal jobs are to interpret the law as written - would throw these cases out, and that anyone would possibly see this as being a good thing.
The American system may not be perfect - as no system in the world is perfect, and ever can be for that matter - but I would NEVER want to see the legitimate legal arguments of a Democrat being thrown out just because I prefer a Republican being in office.
That being said, I wish the gloves and the mask would just come off completely - I would LOVE IT if tomorrow, everyone on the PLANET went to war with the USA, because the USA would win. Yep, the USA would beat the entire planet. That's why I want these assholes to get ever so much more cocky and to continue to escalate tensions, because anyone taking on the USA would lose.
Leftists just keep pushing it and pushing it and PUSHING IT, and just to see them do this to a breaking point would be amazing. It doesn't seem like that happens though...it just seems to be the slow march to communism. It's weird, how so many American right-wingers can be loaded for bear and allow this bullsh*t to go on. But it's not just the USA right now, but the entire planet, and it blows my mind to watch.
-
The campaign also has testimony from a blind person who claims somebody else voted for her, and that she was barred from voting as a result.
One (1) vote....and only if that vote would have gone to Trump.
Trump's team have alleged voter fraud in at least 40 lawsuits and couldn't back it up. What's to say this time will be any different.
Even if Trump's team were to prevail in Nevada, Nevada's 6 electoral votes aren't even enough to make a tiny dent Biden's total win. It is an exercise in futility and a waste of the court's time.
Democrat judges threw out the legal action without even looking it over in most, if not all, of those cases...do you not grasp why that is a problem?
-
Democrat judges threw out the legal action without even looking it over in most, if not all, of those cases...do you not grasp why that is a problem?
Despite what Prime says, those lawsuits that were lost the attorneys were not part of Trumps legal team rather independent attorneys working pro Bono on Trumps behalf. Trump actual team to the best of my knowledge only has 3-4 lawsuits pending in various swing states. But basically, most of not all are up against Obama appointed activist judges. All the fraud is happening in Dem ran cities
-
Democrat judges threw out the legal action without even looking it over in most, if not all, of those cases...do you not grasp why that is a problem?
If this were true, it might be a problem except that judges are nonpartisan in most states including many of which were the Trump team has filed lawsuits which have been tossed out.
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, United States District Judge Matthew Brann – a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania – compared the campaign's legal arguments to “Frankenstein's Monster,” concluding that Mr. Trump's team offered only “speculative accusations," not proof of rampant corruption.
Judge Cynthia Stevens of Michigan is nonpartisan.
-
If this were true, it might be a problem except that judges are nonpartisan in most states including many of which were the Trump team has filed lawsuits which have been tossed out.
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, United States District Judge Matthew Brann – a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania – compared the campaign's legal arguments to “Frankenstein's Monster,” concluding that Mr. Trump's team offered only “speculative accusations," not proof of rampant corruption.
Judge Cynthia Stevens of Michigan is nonpartisan.
You actually think Obama or Clinton appointed judges are nonpartisan? Seriously? Lol
-
Despite what Prime says, those lawsuits that were lost the attorneys were not part of Trumps legal team rather independent attorneys working pro Bono on Trumps behalf. Trump actual team to the best of my knowledge only has 3-4 lawsuits pending in various swing states. But basically, most of not all are up against Obama appointed activist judges. All the fraud is happening in Dem ran cities
Interesting...so those lawyers would only get paid if they win, which means:
[1] They strongly believe they will win.
[2] Since the above is true, they are willing to risk putting all the time and work in, and ultimately not be paid.
That's really admirable, regardless of which one is true. They most likely thought they had a good case. If they thought they would lose, I doubt they would do it UNLESS it was worth it to them to do it based on principle.
So it makes no sense to me that they would put the time in and do something if they didn't feel that they had a good/strong case. It would seem apparent to me that they know that they have a good case. I just don't see why they would put in the work for free if they knew full well they would lose. Unless in some scenario where they knew they would lose, but felt it was a roll of the dice, and worth the gamble - but that seems irrational to me.
If Democrat judges are literally throwing out documents, that's a bombshell. Sometimes I wonder - how can anyone trust the mainstream news anymore, most of which is leftist? And the answer is - they don't. The only mainstream news show with any level of viewership is Tucker Carlson's channel which has something like as many views as the top 10 leftist shows combined, or something. Or has 10 times the views as the top rated leftist show. Those statements are similar, but not exactly the same. And maybe the number is actually five times, I'm not sure.
Either way, Tucker Carlson is killing it. I'm shocked FOX hasn't cancelled him yet.
-
I absolutely did. You sound nervous...like your little Marxist world is about to collapse
great
tell us what the judge said and on what legal argument you disagree
-
-
Interesting...so those lawyers would only get paid if they win, which means:
[1] They strongly believe they will win.
[2] Since the above is true, they are willing to risk putting all the time and work in, and ultimately not be paid.
That's really admirable, regardless of which one is true. They most likely thought they had a good case. If they thought they would lose, I doubt they would do it UNLESS it was worth it to them to do it based on principle.
So it makes no sense to me that they would put the time in and do something if they didn't feel that they had a good/strong case. It would seem apparent to me that they know that they have a good case. I just don't see why they would put in the work for free if they knew full well they would lose. Unless in some scenario where they knew they would lose, but felt it was a roll of the dice, and worth the gamble - but that seems irrational to me.
If Democrat judges are literally throwing out documents, that's a bombshell. Sometimes I wonder - how can anyone trust the mainstream news anymore, most of which is leftist? And the answer is - they don't. The only mainstream news show with any level of viewership is Tucker Carlson's channel which has something like as many views as the top 10 leftist shows combined, or something. Or has 10 times the views as the top rated leftist show. Those statements are similar, but not exactly the same. And maybe the number is actually five times, I'm not sure.
Either way, Tucker Carlson is killing it. I'm shocked FOX hasn't cancelled him yet.
According to Guliani they understood they would have a hard time with left leaning courts and that their path has been heading to the SCOTUS
-
If this were true, it might be a problem except that judges are nonpartisan in most states including many of which were the Trump team has filed lawsuits which have been tossed out.
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, United States District Judge Matthew Brann – a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania – compared the campaign's legal arguments to “Frankenstein's Monster,” concluding that Mr. Trump's team offered only “speculative accusations," not proof of rampant corruption.
Judge Cynthia Stevens of Michigan is nonpartisan.
How many times have Republican politicians sided against Trump? These people are so invested in the system, which they know is rigged, that they would sooner have an establishment politician in power than to have their own political party in power, if the candidate in question [Donald Trump, as was the case] does not toe the line of the rigged two party system.
When you read articles about Republicans doing everything they can to keep Trump out of power, does that not prove to you that the entire system is controlled? These lifetime politicians are willing to lose out in the short-term, knowing that in the long-term, they will be better off if the corrupt system continues. Granted, at this point, I'm not so certain that Republicans quite grasp what will happen if they continue to allow certain policies to continue - such as the continual importation of mass immigrants from the developing world. I suppose Republicans win out in the short-term there, as they are importing cheap labour to run businesses [in jobs, 90% of which will be automated within the next 20 years], but in the long-term, what party do all of those non-White immigrants vote for? For Democrats, obviously.
Republicans are either too stupid to grasp these moronic arguments, or simply don't acknowledge them out of fear of being called "racist". Meanwhile, fear of being called a word is going to see to it that they have no political future in the USA. So these people are just complete morons - at least the more vocal ones who literally go out of their way to denounce Trump. With those specific idiots, who I do not know or for that matter even think necessarily form the majority of Republicans [but they may - as I said, I don't know], they are obviously too stupid to grasp that in the long-run, being left-leaning Republicans are only going to ensure that their future in politics ceases to exist.
Or maybe it is that they think they are positioned to be a lifetime politician regardless, but only if the established order continues - which is why Trump is bad. If that is how they feel, then they are less stupid for being against Trump than in the scenario above where I questioned whether or not they even understand the implications of importing the third world, who will ensure Democrat videos for as long as the USA has some semblance of a Democratic future.
These people are politicians, so obviously they only benefit from the controlled two-party system if they hold positions of power...and that can't happen if the Republicans die as a party...so it just makes me wonder exactly what their thought process is. It may boil down to these people being what I suspected above may be the case - that they are simply too moronic to grasp that if some of Trump's ideas aren't implemented, and if successive waves of millions of immigrants from the developing world are brought to the USA, that there will be no more Republicans, as they will be a party in name only, as Democrats will consistently win elections, since non-White immigrants [and White union workers] vote Democrats at disproportionately high rates. The only issue is that if people who hate the USA's traditional values and hate capitalism vote to destroy it, how do the genius Democrats think they are going to be able to pay for their future handouts? With orange peels?
Exactly how do leftists brains even work, Primemuscle? Do you and your people not grasp the basic laws of economics? And in terms of social reform, exactly what do your people want? The right to shoot police officers and survive the encounter in 100% of cases? Do you realize how unreasonable that demand is? As for this:
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, United States District Judge Matthew Brann – a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania – compared the campaign's legal arguments to “Frankenstein's Monster,” concluding that Mr. Trump's team offered only “speculative accusations," not proof of rampant corruption.
Judge Cynthia Stevens of Michigan is nonpartisan.
Everything I said above that quote was with regards to politicians. As far as judges go, I must say - I expect better from them. Judges, even those who are partisan, are trained to interpret the law as written. That is their job. And being able to interpret law requires the ability to think, and specifically - to think critically.
For this woman's argument against Trump to be that Trump's campaign's legal arguments to be "Frankenstein's Monster" is NOT AN ARGUMENT.
Do you understand this, Primemuscle?
I realize that you are Jewish, and that it is extremely common among Jews to hate White males, so obviously, the Law of Averages tells us that you would not want a strong right-wing White man holding the most powerful position in the United States. I get that. You're a Jew, and you hate White people, specifically White men. That's fine. Well...it's not, but...you are entitled to your opinion.
But do you seriously think calling legal arguments a "Frankenstein's Monster" is an argument?
Is that really your idea of an intelligent debate or intelligent contribution to a discussion?
When I was younger, I was told to respect others, and specifically, to respect my elders. Meanwhile, by about age 12, I literally became more intelligent than at least 50% of the entire population, and I resent buying into the argument that I must always show respect to others. With age, I realized that respect is earned.
And on that note - how I can I respect your arguments, those you presented against Trump, when they are nothing more than mealy-mouthed ad hominem attacks?
-
According to Guliani they understood they would have a hard time with left leaning courts and that their path has been heading to the SCOTUS
Guliani has about as much credibility when it comes to facts as you do.
Which is none. No one takes either of you seriously.
-
According to Guliani ........................ ........................ .
LMMFAO.
-
Guliani has about as much credibility when it comes to facts as you do.
Which is none. No one takes either of you seriously.
Hahahahahah.....loving every second of you melting down😂😂
-
Guliani has about as much credibility when it comes to facts as you do.
Which is none. No one takes either of you seriously.
You really are not that bright. Giuliani was a top prosecutor in New York and a major politician not to mention the namesake for one of the nation’s top law firms. Where there is smoke there is fire.
So tell us again how he has no credibility as a lawyer when he has accomplished more in a day as a young lawyer, compared to you in your entire life?
-
You really are not that bright. Giuliani was a top prosecutor in New York and a major politician not to mention the namesake for one of the nation’s top law firms. Where there is smoke there is fire.
So tell us again how he has no credibility as a lawyer when he has accomplished more in a day as a young lawyer, compared to you in your entire life?
He had his day. He's now 76, senile and nearly whipped his dick out for Sasha Baron Cohen. You have to be better than this, don't you?
-
He had his day. He's now 76, senile and nearly whipped his dick out for Sasha Baron Cohen. You have to be better than this, don't you?
Ageist and borderline homophobe, I expect better from you Abe.
-
Hahahahahah.....loving every second of you melting down😂😂
I'm melting down? Hmm... I don't think I am the one posting multiple threads of dire hopes hanging on the courts overturning a LANDSLIDE victory. I'm not the one attributing the credibility or chance of such a thing happening as "According to Guiliani...". I'm not the one constantly having threads blow up in my face as my little conspiracy theories fall apart under simple observation and common sense.
That would be you piss ant.
-
I'm melting down? Hmm... I don't think I am the one posting multiple threads of dire hopes hanging on the courts overturning a LANDSLIDE victory. I'm not the one attributing the credibility or chance of such a thing happening as "According to Guiliani...". I'm not the one constantly having threads blow up in my face as my little conspiracy theories fall apart under simple observation and common sense.
That would be you piss ant.
Hahahaha...you’re following me around like a puppy dog.
-
You really are not that bright. Giuliani was a top prosecutor in New York and a major politician not to mention the namesake for one of the nation’s top law firms. Where there is smoke there is fire.
So tell us again how he has no credibility as a lawyer when he has accomplished more in a day as a young lawyer, compared to you in your entire life?
If I have to explain to you the absurdness of his actions and words TODAY, then your entire post is irrelevant even more so than it already is.
Maybe Trump can build a time machine and fetch the younger Rudy. Since you think he was so hot shot, maybe he could do a better job than the current version. Because no matter what he used to be, TODAY he is a laughing stock.
-
Hahahaha...you’re following me around like a puppy dog.
Pointing out your inability to connect with reality and your overall stupidity is "following you around?" "Hahahaha"
When it doesn't pan out, how many threads will you make and get your ass roasted in over it? 2? 12? Four years worth?
-
If I have to explain to you the absurdness of his actions and words TODAY, then your entire post is irrelevant even more so than it already is.
Maybe Trump can build a time machine and fetch the younger Rudy. Since you think he was so hot shot, maybe he could do a better job than the current version. Because no matter what he used to be, TODAY he is a laughing stock.
He’s far from a laughing stock after the Pennsylvania hearing today. There will be tears soon for Dems
-
He’s far from a laughing stock after the Pennsylvania hearing today. There will be tears soon for Dems
::)
-
He’s far from a laughing stock after the Pennsylvania hearing today. There will be tears soon for Dems
I’m sure the entire hearing is online but he won’t watch it. He’ll just get his info from 2nd and 3rd sources that will lie to him
-
If I have to explain to you the absurdness of his actions and words TODAY, then your entire post is irrelevant even more so than it already is.
Maybe Trump can build a time machine and fetch the younger Rudy. Since you think he was so hot shot, maybe he could do a better job than the current version. Because no matter what he used to be, TODAY he is a laughing stock.
What did he say today that’s laughable? He gave a concise opening statement of witnesses and introduced talking points of consideration in an orderly manner.
Again he’s a respected litigator. He hasn’t lost his touch in front of a panel or a courtroom. Lay-off the attorney movies.
-
And in other news, Coach is 100 % lifetime natural.
-
What did he say today that’s laughable? He gave a concise opening statement of witnesses and introduced talking points of consideration in an orderly manner.
Again he’s a respected litigator. He hasn’t lost his touch in front of a panel or a courtroom. Lay-off the attorney movies.
::)
-
I’m sure the entire hearing is online but he won’t watch it. He’ll just get his info from 2nd and 3rd sources that will lie to him
Closing statement by Doug Mastriano was heartfelt and as a non-American, it nearly brought a tear to my eye.
I am enthralled by it all. That such blatant cheating can happen in the US election.
-
Closing statement by Doug Mastriano was heartfelt and as a non-American, it nearly brought a tear to my eye.
I am enthralled by it all. That such blatant cheating can happen in the US election.
Twitter actually banned his account today
-
And in other news, Coach is 100 % lifetime natural.
I’ve never said I was natural
-
The elephant in the room is the fact that Biden got too many vites to be stopped from taking office. Heavy manipulation from the msm to hollywood to social media etc is the difference maker, not disenfranchised voters. Trump cannot really do much about the fact that this country has so many who are easily manipulated. If he wanted the presidency so bad he should have been willing to do whatever it took just like his opposition did. He didnt, and now we have to suffer.
-
Sorry I'm late to Coaches latest Trump is gonna win post. What's the latest? Something change?
-
According to the testimony all but like 3200
You obviously are confusing testimony, given under an oath, with a charade of a hearing with no standing and no legal authority. But.. you're a coach so all is forgiven
-
According to Guliani they understood they would have a hard time with left leaning courts and that their path has been heading to the SCOTUS
But Coach it hasn't been left leaning courts. It's been an equal amount of right leaning courts. Operative word is courts. Come on, you're better than this.. right?
-
But Coach it hasn't been left leaning courts. It's been an equal amount of right leaning courts. Operative word is courts. Come on, you're better than this.. right?
Mmmm.....this is happening in all Dem ran cities🤷♂️
Now you have state’s Supreme courts that thinks they can make laws...again🤷♂️
-
https://video.parler.com/6C/pT/6CpTI1AvsBdl.mp4
-
The elephant in the room is the fact that Biden got too many vites to be stopped from taking office. Heavy manipulation from the msm to hollywood to social media etc is the difference maker, not disenfranchised voters. Trump cannot really do much about the fact that this country has so many who are easily manipulated. If he wanted the presidency so bad he should have been willing to do whatever it took just like his opposition did. He didnt, and now we have to suffer.
Yes he can. He can thank them for his term in office.
;D
-
Sorry I'm late to Coaches latest Trump is gonna win post. What's the latest? Something change?
New day. New lawsuit. New claim made in regards to an old lawsuit. New opinion. New message from the Ouija board.
SOMETHING IS GONNA CHANGE. Or not and instead we will be stuck with these desperation scented threads from Coach and the trollops for the next six months.
-
(https://www.houseofcharity.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/White-Square.jpg)
-
Hilarious, Joe posts a link.
Like clockwork, In comes the usual group of five libtards or so with their brilliant TDS meltdowns in each thread.
Such as:
"OH ya, well Trump wont win, so there"! ::)
LMFAO ;D
-
According to Guliani they understood they would have a hard time with left leaning courts and that their path has been heading to the SCOTUS
If I were you, which thank goodness I am not in this case, Guliani is either intentionally misleading others or he's more likely lost his marbles because the suits which haven't already died in the state and appeals courts will die there soon enough. Trump has been trumped, get used to it.
-
Guliani has about as much credibility when it comes to facts as you do.
Which is none. No one takes either of you seriously.
You speakest the truth.
-
LMMFAO.
And so am I, as if I ever had much of one to laugh off. ;D
-
-
Hahahahahah.....loving every second of you melting down😂😂
Guliani, Ohhh! You cursed brat! Look what you've done! I'm melting! Melting! Oh, what a world! What a world! Who would have thought a good little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness! Ohhh! Look out! Look out! I'm going! Ohhhh - Ohhhhhhhhhh!
(https://preview.redd.it/q3gz7h7r6pf11.jpg?auto=webp&s=6c60a378aef06e7740a4acd41d350af7d391b0cf)
-
The only wizardry going on lately is Biden getting so many votes, but facts don`t matter, agenda does.
What you see being posted now regarding Rudy is another commie tactic always used by the left, personal discreditation, in this case by non factual ridicule, because there is nothing else to use on him.
-
;D. ;D
Too many conspiracy theories being thrown by the GETBIG trump fan boys.. Meet your new President starting January 20th..
(https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer/xZ-akIH9obtvOq5hJ75Uc9yrQR4=/415x292/top/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/tronc/BBVCPNCETVFG3NJICBOD3GTBZQ.jpg)
;D. ;D
-
;D. ;D
Too many conspiracy theories being thrown by the GETBIG trump fan boys.. Meet your new President starting January 20th..
(https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer/xZ-akIH9obtvOq5hJ75Uc9yrQR4=/415x292/top/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/tronc/BBVCPNCETVFG3NJICBOD3GTBZQ.jpg)
;D. ;D
NOT my prez, so this is not Ken Waller ???
-
Dementia Pedo Joe - not enough mental awareness to keep it a secret.
#IllegitimatePresident
#NotMyPedoPresident
#1stPedoPotus
-
Dementia Pedo Joe - not enough mental awareness to keep it a secret.
#IllegitimatePresident
#NotMyPedoPresident
#1stPedoPotus
who the fark is "we"