If this were true, it might be a problem except that judges are nonpartisan in most states including many of which were the Trump team has filed lawsuits which have been tossed out.
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, United States District Judge Matthew Brann – a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania – compared the campaign's legal arguments to “Frankenstein's Monster,” concluding that Mr. Trump's team offered only “speculative accusations," not proof of rampant corruption.
Judge Cynthia Stevens of Michigan is nonpartisan.
How many times have Republican politicians sided against Trump? These people are so invested in the system, which they know is rigged, that they would sooner have an establishment politician in power than to have their own political party in power, if the candidate in question [Donald Trump, as was the case] does not toe the line of the rigged two party system.
When you read articles about Republicans doing everything they can to keep Trump out of power, does that not prove to you that the entire system is controlled? These lifetime politicians are willing to lose out in the short-term, knowing that in the long-term, they will be better off if the corrupt system continues. Granted, at this point, I'm not so certain that Republicans quite grasp what will happen if they continue to allow certain policies to continue - such as the continual importation of mass immigrants from the developing world. I suppose Republicans win out in the short-term there, as they are importing cheap labour to run businesses [in jobs, 90% of which will be automated within the next 20 years], but in the long-term, what party do all of those non-White immigrants vote for? For Democrats, obviously.
Republicans are either too stupid to grasp these moronic arguments, or simply don't acknowledge them out of fear of being called "racist". Meanwhile, fear of being called a word is going to see to it that they have no political future in the USA. So these people are just complete morons - at least the more vocal ones who literally go out of their way to denounce Trump. With those specific idiots, who I do not know or for that matter even think necessarily form the majority of Republicans [but they may - as I said, I don't know], they are obviously too stupid to grasp that in the long-run, being left-leaning Republicans are only going to ensure that their future in politics ceases to exist.
Or maybe it is that they think they are positioned to be a lifetime politician regardless, but only if the established order continues - which is why Trump is bad. If that is how they feel, then they are less stupid for being against Trump than in the scenario above where I questioned whether or not they even understand the implications of importing the third world, who will ensure Democrat videos for as long as the USA has some semblance of a Democratic future.
These people are politicians, so obviously they only benefit from the controlled two-party system if they hold positions of power...and that can't happen if the Republicans die as a party...so it just makes me wonder exactly what their thought process is. It may boil down to these people being what I suspected above may be the case - that they are simply too moronic to grasp that if some of Trump's ideas aren't implemented, and if successive waves of millions of immigrants from the developing world are brought to the USA, that there will be no more Republicans, as they will be a party in name only, as Democrats will consistently win elections, since non-White immigrants [and White union workers] vote Democrats at disproportionately high rates. The only issue is that if people who hate the USA's traditional values and hate capitalism vote to destroy it, how do the genius Democrats think they are going to be able to pay for their future handouts? With orange peels?
Exactly how do leftists brains even work, Primemuscle? Do you and your people not grasp the basic laws of economics? And in terms of social reform, exactly what do your people want? The right to shoot police officers and survive the encounter in 100% of cases? Do you realize how unreasonable that demand is? As for this:
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, United States District Judge Matthew Brann – a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania – compared the campaign's legal arguments to “Frankenstein's Monster,” concluding that Mr. Trump's team offered only “speculative accusations," not proof of rampant corruption.
Judge Cynthia Stevens of Michigan is nonpartisan.
Everything I said above that quote was with regards to politicians. As far as judges go, I must say - I expect better from them. Judges, even those who are partisan, are trained to interpret the law as written. That is their job. And being able to interpret law requires the ability to think, and specifically - to think critically.
For this woman's argument against Trump to be that Trump's campaign's legal arguments to be "Frankenstein's Monster" is NOT AN ARGUMENT.
Do you understand this, Primemuscle?
I realize that you are Jewish, and that it is extremely common among Jews to hate White males, so obviously, the Law of Averages tells us that you would not want a strong right-wing White man holding the most powerful position in the United States. I get that. You're a Jew, and you hate White people, specifically White men. That's fine. Well...it's not, but...you are entitled to your opinion.
But do you seriously think calling legal arguments a "Frankenstein's Monster" is an argument?
Is that really your idea of an intelligent debate or intelligent contribution to a discussion?
When I was younger, I was told to respect others, and specifically, to respect my elders. Meanwhile, by about age 12, I literally became more intelligent than at least 50% of the entire population, and I resent buying into the argument that I must always show respect to others. With age, I realized that respect is earned.
And on that note - how I can I respect your arguments, those you presented against Trump, when they are nothing more than mealy-mouthed ad hominem attacks?
