Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Getbiger of the past Bast on February 03, 2022, 01:31:16 PM
-
Why was The True Adonis banned? What did he post about that did it?
Please vote in the poll, and act fast. Voting closes: June 20, 2049, 04:31:16 PM
-
Hi TA
-
This sub 100 post count no0b asks a lot of questions.
-
Only if Jizziumbelle posts a titty pic first.
-
I would welcome back the Counterfiet Confederate. Insert Rebel yell here.
-
Only if he can be a true man proven , guilty of pedophilia.
If not, he is welcome back.
-
YESAdonis was a good dude who brought teh funny.
-
Yes.
-
Yes, but he is on here already.....just a different name.
There has been a few threads asking which older getbiggers are still here, and he has logged in under TA to state "present" each time.
-
TA was a great poster. I missed the talk of being a pedophile, and the associated posts, so I am out of the loop on that. But he had some awesome threads, for sure.
-
TA was a great poster. I missed the talk of being a pedophile, and the associated posts, so I am out of the loop on that. But he had some awesome threads, for sure.
Same here. What the couple of times I asked why TA was banned, I didn't get an answer.
Overall, I am a big fan of how Getbig is moderated - I don't want to tell mods what to do.
That said, I was honestly just wondering why TA was given the boot. I never got a clear answer on that. If anyone knows, if you could let me know [here or PM], that would be great.
To answer the question: yes, I'd like TA to come back.
-
i`m craving some George Washington Carver scones with some Thomas Jefferson pheasant under glass in honor of Black History Month. ;D
-
Of course he should be back. He's kind of an interweb legend.
-
westcock bagles with argo starch and white sugar
-
westcock bagles with argo starch and white sugar
Are these an east coast delicacy?
-
Are these an east coast delicacy?
Near east coast. From when he competed in Thebes.
-
Getbig.com is literally the greatest thing since sliced bread.
-
Same here. What the couple of times I asked why TA was banned, I didn't get an answer.
Overall, I am a big fan of how Getbig is moderated - I don't want to tell mods what to do.
That said, I was honestly just wondering why TA was given the boot. I never got a clear answer on that. If anyone knows, if you could let me know [here or PM], that would be great.
To answer the question: yes, I'd like TA to come back.
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
-
Getbig.com is literally the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Your profile says you joined in 2010. All the really funny shit happened before then. Now it's more like an uncooked roll of dough
-
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
Wow....never knew that shit. Good riddance in that case >:(
-
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
Posts about him having sex with underage girls?
No - lifetime ban.
-
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
Did not know this.
-
So we're not supposed to post about it because we obviously don't want that type of content here, but tons of people asking why and for his return can now make a more informed opinion.
-
So we're not supposed to post about it because we obviously don't want that type of content here, but tons of people asking why and for his return can now make a more informed opinion.
So the new account (Matt Canning gimmick or TA himself) supports bringing back a known pedophile to Getbig?
Obviously disgusting perverts of a feather flock together and support each other.
-
Why was The True Adonis banned? What did he post about that did it?
Please vote in the poll, and act fast. Voting closes: June 20, 2049, 04:31:16 PM
If there's one thing I hope arises from this thread, it's an answer to the question of what TA did to get banned.
I've never gotten a clear answer on that, and I didn't personally witness what he did [ I didn't read the thread].
Some clarification would be cool.
-
If there's one thing I hope arises from this thread, it's an answer to the question of what TA did to get banned.
I've never gotten a clear answer on that, and I didn't personally witness what he did [ I didn't read the thread].
Some clarification would be cool.
Read the response from Chaos. It seems clear.
-
Hi TA
;D ;D ;D
-
Read the response from Chaos. It seems clear.
Ah. I came back to vote, and didn't notice his reply:
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
I would trust Getbig's mods to know how to evaluate that type of content, so I would have to believe this.
I have a friend whose dad [who passed away in 2001, at age 63] got married at 29 - when his wife was 13.
That was pretty normal for the decade and the country they came from. Maybe not "normal"...but not completely unusual.
However TA worded his posts, if he was warned about it, then that is that.
If I received a message from a mod stating that all my posts need to be under 100 words - I'd have to either do it, and not be shocked if I got banned for not following this rule.
One of my favourite things about this place is that you don't need to have a specific ideology to post here. I can understand how that topic above is not acceptable to post here. What I don't understand is why TA didn't drop it if sufficiently warned by the moderator team.
Too bad - but...now I know. Thanks for clarifying, chaos.
-
Your profile says you joined in 2010. All the really funny shit happened before then. Now it's more like an uncooked roll of dough
I was a lurker prior to 2010. My loss I guess.
-
I was a lurker prior to 2010. My loss I guess.
No worries. I lurked and/or posted anonymously (when we could back then) for years before I joined. Were you at least lurking during Jay's Olympia's when we all did our best to sucker people into threads about him that turned out to be a fridge or freezer. Those were some fucking classics, and very creative.
-
Matt C told me that Adonis posted about this to be banned:
"Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool."
What was that all about? Adonis thinks the age of consent should be lowered? Did he say he is attracted to minors? Can I get more details? Was he serious or joking?
-
I'm biased, of course, because TA introduced me to GetBig.
Great guy.
-
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
Why can't people have bad opinions though? How does that harm anyone on this board?
-
No worries. I lurked and/or posted anonymously (when we could back then) for years before I joined. Were you at least lurking during Jay's Olympia's when we all did our best to sucker people into threads about him that turned out to be a fridge or freezer. Those were some fucking classics, and very creative.
Yes, I witnessed that.
-
adonis always bragged about dating high school girls before he met "jezebel"
not a pedophile as high school girls aren't prepubescent but definitely wrong and illegal
E
-
adonis always bragged about dating high school girls before he met "jezebel"
not a pedophile as high school girls aren't prepubescent but definitely wrong and illegal
E
but why does that warrant him being removed from a fitness website? How was him typing about that harmful to anyone?
-
but why does that warrant him being removed from a fitness website? How was him typing about that harmful to anyone?
Matt wants Walter Slobincock banned because he talks Matthias hand elbow deep up your anus as he uses you as a puppet.
And your asking why someone is banned for talking about making sweet sweet love to minors?
No worries. I lurked and/or posted anonymously (when we could back then) for years before I joined. Were you at least lurking during Jay's Olympia's when we all did our best to sucker people into threads about him that turned out to be a fridge or freezer. Those were some fucking classics, and very creative.
Those were great days!
-
And your asking why someone is banned for talking about making sweet sweet love to minors?
so if someone for example talks about using illegal drugs like steroids should they also be banned from getbig? What is this, internet court?
-
so if someone for example talks about using illegal drugs like steroids should they also be banned from getbig? What is this, internet court?
This is Getbig!
If you want to talk about the joys of pedophila login in to CNN…..
That’s a JNN quality post!
-
What is this, internet court?
Yes. We don't approve of or support those actions or the fucking disgusting people that endorse them. If you think it's wrong to ban someone for supporting pedophilia or underage sex, maybe this isn't the forum for you.
-
Yes. We don't approve of or support those actions or the fucking disgusting people that endorse them. If you think it's wrong to ban someone for supporting pedophilia or underage sex, maybe this isn't the forum for you.
i'm against pedophilia but I am also against censorship of people whose views we dislike. For example I'm against abortion but I don't think people who support abortion should be banned from getbig and social media. Get it?
Plus if you see the poll... most people want him back on getbig so seems they disagree with you
-
i'm against pedophilia but I am also against censorship of people whose views we dislike. For example I'm against abortion but I don't think people who support abortion should be banned from getbig and social media. Get it?
Plus if you see the poll... most people want him back on getbig so seems they disagree with you
They can disagree all they want. You obviously don't understand and that's ok. He's not coming back.
-
You obviously don't understand and that's ok.
maybe his posts were overly offensive i suppose but i am disappointed because he was entertaining. I made the poll to see what others thought and it seems they don't think what he posted was that bad unless they didn't read it?
-
maybe his posts were overly offensive i suppose but i am disappointed because he was entertaining. I made the poll to see what others thought and it seems they don't think what he posted was that bad unless they didn't read it?
So you support pedophilia and pedophiles….stupid fucking Retard Canning gimmick
Someone should beat your empty skull flat with a fucking shovel.
-
stupid fucking Retard Canning gimmick
wow you're against mentally challenged people! you need to be banned!
-
So you support pedophilia and pedophiles….stupid fucking Retard Canning gimmick
Someone should beat your empty skull flat with a fucking shovel.
LOL
-
wow you're against mentally challenged people! you need to be banned!
quote author=Matt link=topic=670909.msg9533127#msg9533127 date=1611992501]
Sorry, I forgot to include that. Thank you for reminding me, Phantom Spunker:
- Walter Sobchak thinks I've a abandoned my three children, and posted comments to that effect numerous times on here. Each time he accuses me of abandoning my children, I MELT.
In fact, it's gotten so bad, that any time I even just see Walter Sobchak's user name, I MELT.
In fact, I've MELTED more over the past few days from reading Walter Sobchak's posts than I've MELTED in over 17 years on Getbig.
When I see Walter Sobchak has replied to one of my posts, I immediately MELT, even before reading a word of it.
Then when I do read one of Walter Sobchak's whole posts, I MELT multiple times over the course of reading it.
I've never MELTED so many times in my life than I have in the past three days of reading Walter Sobchak's posts.
I'm not really afraid of too much. I have no fear speaking my mind to the strongest men, even if we disagree. As long as I'm respectful and cordial, what's the big deal?
But Walter Sobchak is an exception - I can honestly say, if we met, I'd melt within the first ten seconds of being in his presence.
I'm not saying this as a compliment, precisely, but there's never been a Getbigger who has made me MELT again and again, like Walter Sobchak has been able too, especially over the past three days.
And honestly, I seldom melt - be it here in Getbig or elsewhere online, or anywhere else.
I welled up when my son was born. I may have outright cried, but I can't recall.
Is it safe to say that a grown man crying falls under the umbrella of melting?
In any case, the form of MELTING I consistently experience from Walter's posts comprise being thrown into a rage immediately upon reading his comments about my children.
I've always been overprotective of my children, and in a warped and unintended way, Walter Sobchak has really put my paternity instinct for protecting my children into overdrive.
Say whatever you want about me. My only request is to leave my family out of it.
My family are Salt of the Earth type people. They really don't deserve any stress or grief caused by me.
My kids are 11, 10, and 4, for crying out loud.
I'd seriously rather get shanked by a Getbigger than have my innocent children dragged into any beef someone here has on me.
Also, I can't do much to an anonymous trash-talker, but I am hyper-overprotective of my children.
Let me put this on record:
If I ever go to jail for murder in my life, I can guarantee that it stemmed from protecting my children.
Walter Sobchak may well be 6'4" and 290-lb. I don't give a fuck how big or strong he is. When it comes to protecting my children, something just snaps in my brain - I go from brave to fool-hardy.
A man my size would have to be insane to fight a guy the size Walter Sobchak claims to be. But I know myself. And if a man that size [allegedly - and allegedly that strong] disrespected my kids to me in person, I just imagine attacking such a man with the ferocity and rage of a day rabid dog.
I know I posted a lot here, but I love my kids - and frankly, I don't even want to think about what I'd do to keep them safe, because I just know I'd murder someone if I felt it came to that.
Jail is NOT a deterrent for me when it comes to defending my children.
I'll be honest, of all my loved ones and good friends, my kids are the only people I would commit murder to protect if I had to, in order to keep them safe. My kids are the best thing that ever happened to me. My kids are my life.
Walter Sobchak:
Who calls out small children?
Dick.
Trash me all you want in ten threads a day for the next year, if that floats your boat. You seem to have some good [bad] material on me already, 85% of which is true. And I can get you plenty more.
But bringing my kids into it? My youngest child is literally the most innocent little 3-year-old girl I've ever been blessed to have in my life.
Does it make you feel like a big man talking about a child who isn't yet able to defend herself?
[/quote]
-
maybe his posts were overly offensive i suppose but i am disappointed because he was entertaining. I made the poll to see what others thought and it seems they don't think what he posted was that bad unless they didn't read it?
I'd have to read the posts for myself. TA is from North Carolina, if I'm not mistaken. In NC, the legal age of consent is 16. TA just turned 40. He could be dating a 16-year-old, and it doesn't meet the legal definition of pedophilia. As creepy as that might be, the bottom line is, it's completely legal in his state, and a far cry from saying he thinks sleeping with 6-year-olds is ok.
https://www.ageofconsent.net/states/north-carolina
Accusing someone of pedophilia is a big claim - I don't take accusations like that lightly. Similar things were claimed about Primemuscle, and there is zero evidence of that.
If TA was posting something, and warned against posting material of that nature, and was banned - that shouldn't surprise anyone. But I'd have to see proof of any so-called pedophilia claims, defending pedophilia, making jokes, etc.
On the flip side, I don't think Getbig takes bans lightly...so I'd be compelled to believe there is something to this story.
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/6QPJ35wd/Walter-Sobchak2.jpg)
This is the best software feature I've ever seen in my life, lol.
-
31 Yes - 10 No. That settles it. The True Adonis is coming back to getbig!
-
I'm biased, of course, because TA introduced me to GetBig.
Great guy.
If you had a kid with a girl he introduced you to that birthed said child, and you found out he was pro sex with minors, would you still be pro-biased toward TA?
No place in society for that shit.
-
If you had a kid with a girl he introduced you to that birthed said child, and you found out he was pro sex with minors, would you still be pro-biased toward TA?
No place in society for that shit.
I found out yesterday that North Carolina, the state in which TTA resides in, has an age of consent of just 16. Did he speak about sex with girls below age 16 or 16 and above? I know 16 is still low in the opinion of most people but if it's 16+ then this information may be significant and should be taken into consideration.
-
If you had a kid with a girl he introduced you to that birthed said child, and you found out he was pro sex with minors, would you still be pro-biased toward TA?
No place in society for that shit.
but the age of consent is different in different societies. Elvis dated a 15 year old and he was a beloved musician so there must be some kind of place in some society? I personally think 18 is a fine minimum age of consent but others obviously disagree. Some states have age of consent of just 16 including the state True Adonis lives in.
-
but the age of consent is different in different societies. Elvis dated a 15 year old and he was a beloved musician so there must be some kind of place in some society? I personally think 18 is a fine minimum age of consent but others obviously disagree. Some states have age of consent of just 16 including the state True Adonis lives in.
You seem to be a bit of a cunt. No?
-
Crap didn’t know he was in support of pedophilia which I am vehemently against. I wish I could change my vote. He seemed like a nice fella but I take it back now.
-
but the age of consent is different in different societies. Elvis dated a 15 year old and he was a beloved musician so there must be some kind of place in some society? I personally think 18 is a fine minimum age of consent but others obviously disagree. Some states have age of consent of just 16 including the state True Adonis lives in.
It sounded to me like he was speaking below that, but I don't know? Age of consent is 16 here as well. When I used to work at the gym I signed up this hot ass bitch who was 16 who's dad brought her in. She was giving me the eye the whole time while her dad was telling me how pretty she was and he was afraid to sign her up and have older guys all over her. I told him don't worry, I'll watch over her as back then the gym had us do the first 3 training sessions with new members if we were qualified so they felt more comfortable as we had a 30 day out clause in the contract. I was 28 or 29 at the time, but I meant what I said in that I would look out for her cuz she did not look 16 at all, and her dad was well aware of that.
Anyway, the first thing we were supposed to do with new members was take their measurements and weight (something I was always uncomfortable with as it was done behind doors in these small windowless offices we had...it was just putting us into a spot asking for trouble). Before her first training session, I take her back, weigh her, and start doing tapes from the calves up as I always felt that was most comfortable for me, and any chick I'd signed up....guys it was shoulders down....and no Prime, peckers were not measured. So I get to Jenny's waist and she lifts up her shirt just a bit, no biggie. I say "ok, your chest measurement is next. I can hold it to your back while you tape the front cuz I don't want you to feel uncomfortable." She says, "no, you can do it. Do you want me to take my shirt off?" I'm thinking "OH FUCK! What do I do here this girl is a 11/10 with DD's, and only 16? Fuck yeah I want to see those tits" Instead, I say no "your shirt doesn't make a big difference. Just wear the same thing next time"
So we go through a first training session, and all is cool, but she is flirting the whole time. 2nd session comes around, still flirting with me, and she wears a sports bra this time. We get to tricep pushdowns on the multi station that has the back pad. She asks are you staring at my tits?, and I say no I'm looking at your triceps to make sure they are flexing so you're doing them right....total lie. She then asks me if I've ever fucked a 16 year old before? I said yeah when I was 18. She tells me she thinks I'm hot, asks me my age, and tells me straight up she's virgin, has always wanted her first to be an older guy, and she wants me to be the one that fucks her. I must've turned the darkest red ever. Somehow I got through the workout with her, and blew it off telling her she just had a crush.
But, Jenny did not look 16 at all. She looked 22-25, and working at the gym I knew a lot of cops. In particular, I had become really good friends with this cop named Dave who worked out when I did during the early afternoon b4 my shift. He worked the late shift for the PD here, and I worked the closing shift until 2am. He would stop in every night around 11-12 at night to bullshit and get a Speed Stack or Ripped Force drink when ABB was still big. Jenny happened to be there, and I told him the story as she was very persistent about wanting me to be her first. So I pointed her out, told him her age, asked what the age of consent was, and for advice. He said 16, but just don't fucking video tape it or it's child porn under 18, and hell yeah he would fuck her if he was me. So now I'm thinking hmmmm........she keeps approaching me, and finally I say okay come over this weekend. She says "no, I babysit for this family every weeknight. come over there" Red flags start going off. If you want to fuck me, why would you want to be in someone else's home, and especially when she was watching kids vs. my place and in privacy. Can't rape the willing right? I don't get it, so I'm freaked out, and I am no longer considering it ever again now but kept friendly with her until I moved outta state.
Fast forward about 6-7 years later when I'm doing sales for the largest bank in town in a huge tower building that is connected by a food court to a downtown uppity condo building and there she is sitting two tables in front of me to the left by herself. I keep thinking holy shit is that who I think it is :o as she keeps looking up while trying to avoid eye contact. I finally ask "Jenny ____?" no one is believing this right now anyway, but you really wouldn't believe it if I put her last name.
To me, I just find this so funny I think it's worth typing out. So, she looks up at me beet red and says "yeah" like she didn't remember me or all the dirty shit she had said to me, and I play along reminding her my name and how we met. Ends up we were in the same parking garage and 2 floors apart in the tower, and she was in C/S on the 8-5 shift which is when all us sales reps left bcuz it was b2b sales. We ended up walking together a few times to the parking garage, got along, shared some laughs, and a bit about what we'd done in between us meeting, but never talked about anything in the past other than asking her if she still worked out there. Found out she had a kid with some useless fuck that dumped her at 18 or 19, and that she was pretty miserable about life. I remember thinking two things.... "G-damn, I'm glad I didn't fuck her since she didn't know how to use birth control" and "G-damn, if she didn't have a kid now I'd fuck her silly cuz she is still just as hot"
Anyway, point is....I get your point that context matters, as does local laws. But it seemed to me in this thread he was talking lower than 16. I had a hard time with that with an 11/10 being ok here legally, and if he was talking about anything lower than that that wasn't legal or doesn't make an adult think twice I just can't justify nothing but a permanent ban.
-
Europeans reading this thread
(https://en.meming.world/images/en/thumb/1/17/Monkey_Puppet.jpg/300px-Monkey_Puppet.jpg)
-
Europeans reading this thread
(https://en.meming.world/images/en/thumb/1/17/Monkey_Puppet.jpg/300px-Monkey_Puppet.jpg)
LMFAO. Polanski be like "what?"
-
Matt wants Walter Slobincock banned because he talks Matthias hand elbow deep up your anus as he uses you as a puppet.
And your asking why someone is banned for talking about making sweet sweet love to minors?
Those were great days!
Lmao I said the exact same thing in another thread, but the other way around. I thought Matt was being exploited by Bast.
Reading more of their posts it looks like they are just mutually stroking each other off.
"I'm gonna post pro TA posts, back me up on it"
"Okay, but you back me up on my anti Walter posts"
-
Lmao I said the exact same thing in another thread, but the other way around. I thought Matt was being exploited by Bast.
Reading more of their posts it looks like they are just mutually stroking each other off.
"I'm gonna post pro TA posts, back me up on it"
"Okay, but you back me up on my anti Walter posts"
It's obvious they have some sort of gimmick together.
Kind of gay but whatever.
-
He is too ugly to come back.
We already have Bhank, Matt, Coach..
-
why was true adonis banned?
-
why was true adonis banned?
Supposedly for posting comments supporting pedophilia, despite being warned repeatedly.
But any accusation of pedophilia against someone is one I apply the highest level of scrutiny towards. Since crimes against children of any nature [let alone sex crimes] are about the most vile sort of crime possible, I don't just take it lightly when someone accuses another person of that.
TA is from North Carolina, and is 40 years old. He could sleep with a 16-year-old / 10th grade teenage girl, and that would be legal in his state.
So is THAT what he justified doing? Because THAT IS NOT FUCKING PEDOPHILIA. My God...was he talking about fucking children, or women who are legal age, but young? We may as well lock up Leonardo DiCaprio at this rate.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media is continually writing articles to justify actual pedophilia.
I would have to know what TA said, in order to make a judgment on the matter.
That being said, if he was posting in a certain way, and warned NOT to post in that way, then kept doing it and got banned...he can't really complain.
I just hope I will get a mod's warning before getting banned, so I can attempt to follow the rules first, before ultimately being banned.
-
Am I reading this correctly ???
Posters are asking to let a person who posted about sex with minors back on this board ???
You've got to be out of your spastic tarted cvunt mind.
How could be that be good for our board besides maybe bringing more creepy posters and maybe more rules and regulations from above ???
...and I always liked TA but he crossed over a line you can't cross.
-
Am I reading this correctly ???
Posters are asking to let a person who posted about sex with minors back on this board ???
Most people, apparently.
I've known TA from the boards for 18 years. I don't believe that he posted about "sex with minors". It was stated he talked about sex with "underage girls". A 17-year-old is "underage" when it comes to drinking alcohol, but not for sex with an adult.
There is HUGE nuance in this discussion. Was he talking about fucking 7-year-old children? Teenagers going through puberty? Teenagers who are legal age to have sex with anyone they want [16 in TA's state of NC]?
Huge difference between all of the above. I have never seen TA ever defend pedophilia, and that's a massive claim, that I am going to need evidence before believing it.
If you got kicked off the board, and I was told it was because you "supported pedophilia", I sure as hell wouldn't believe it without evidence.
Leonardo DiCaprio has had the mob after him for dating 23-year-old women. ::) I'd like to know what was actually said or done before making a judgment.
But if I am mistaken, and TA literally did promote having sex with children or something, I wouldn't defend anything he said.
I'm just not buying it.
I'm glad this thread is here, and we can see how many people want TA to come back.
-
I believe TA was condoning sex with girls who just reached puberty, as young as 11.
-
Fucking A some long winded mofos in this post. I don’t know who’s worse. Matt, Bast or myt1.
-
I believe TA was condoning sex with girls who just reached puberty, as young as 11.
yikes
not good
no wonder why he bailed
???
-
I believe TA was condoning sex with girls who just reached puberty, as young as 11.
Yes, it was along those lines. I think Goodrum called him out about it (and others) and there was a lengthy thread.
Anyone supporting a guy who believes sex with an 11 year old is acceptable really needs to step back and consider getting help. Or they need their head bashed in with a fucking crowbar.
-
I believe TA was condoning sex with girls who just reached puberty, as young as 11.
That type of thing makes all the difference, IMO.
That's why in Canada, there are laws, such as - for those of pubescent age, they can have sex with people up to two years older than they are. I.e., a 12-year-old can have sex with a 14-year-old in Canada, I think. Something like that.
If TA was saying a pubescent girl should be able to have sex with a pubescent girl, I wouldn't personally care. But if he was condoning or promoting actual sexual activity that is illegal under American law, then I'd have to agree he should have been banned, especially if he was warned.
There are very few things I think are ban-able offenses, and breaking actual laws is one of them. I personally cannot stand when people accuse other members of pedophilia without evidence, for example, because that is illegal under defamation of character and similar laws, in the USA.
And TA making posts that encourage sex with women actually under legal age to have sex is not something I can condone. I thought maybe he was talking about having sex with women under 20, or something. I just think pedophilia is a massive thing to accuse someone of, and I'm glad this thread got posted.
So TA posted that? ??? Wow. I missed all of that, apparently.
-
Am I reading this correctly ???
Posters are asking to let a person who posted about sex with minors back on this board ???
You've got to be out of your spastic tarted cvunt mind.
How could be that be good for our board besides maybe bringing more creepy posters and maybe more rules and regulations from above ???
...and I always liked TA but he crossed over a line you can't cross.
This
I believe TA was condoning sex with girls who just reached puberty, as young as 11.
And this.
I enjoyed TA's posts and interactions until he started expressing these types of opinions and dug himself in. Now he can fuck off and if you support TA, you can fuck off too.
THERE WILL BE NO PEDO SUPPORTERS ALLOWED TO POST ON GETBIG.
-
Supposedly for posting comments supporting pedophilia, despite being warned repeatedly.
But any accusation of pedophilia against someone is one I apply the highest level of scrutiny towards. Since crimes against children of any nature [let alone sex crimes] are about the most vile sort of crime possible, I don't just take it lightly when someone accuses another person of that.
TA is from North Carolina, and is 40 years old. He could sleep with a 16-year-old / 10th grade teenage girl, and that would be legal in his state.
So is THAT what he justified doing? Because THAT IS NOT FUCKING PEDOPHILIA. My God...was he talking about fucking children, or women who are legal age, but young? We may as well lock up Leonardo DiCaprio at this rate.
Meanwhile, the mainstream media is continually writing articles to justify actual pedophilia.
I would have to know what TA said, in order to make a judgment on the matter.
That being said, if he was posting in a certain way, and warned NOT to post in that way, then kept doing it and got banned...he can't really complain.
I just hope I will get a mod's warning before getting banned, so I can attempt to follow the rules first, before ultimately being banned.
You're a fucking idiot so let someone who IS from North Carolina. The age of consent is 16 to DATE someone who is 18 years and older. However , having sex with someone that is 16 is illegal unless they are married in most cases. So no, you cant fuck a 16 year old in North Carolina
Even though dating a 16 year old is legal..WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU??? Just because something is legal doesnt mean its a good idea and you simply should find someone 18 and over.
-
Am I reading this correctly ???
Posters are asking to let a person who posted about sex with minors back on this board ???
You've got to be out of your spastic tarted cvunt mind.
How could be that be good for our board besides maybe bringing more creepy posters and maybe more rules and regulations from above ???
...and I always liked TA but he crossed over a line you can't cross.
Dear Calvin
BIG difference between TA and Pillowtalk (who was a real Pedo of Peace)
-
Pedo Posts Of Peace
-
Pedo Posts Of Peace
Yea, i cant believe these people defending this shit
-
Lmao I said the exact same thing in another thread, but the other way around. I thought Matt was being exploited by Bast.
Reading more of their posts it looks like they are just mutually stroking each other off.
"I'm gonna post pro TA posts, back me up on it"
"Okay, but you back me up on my anti Walter posts"
Lol it’s weird. Bast is even posting long tirades like Matt.
BUT…
one thing is for sure, we can see that the quality of my posts have taken a step forward if I am mirroring what you’ve posted!
-
GIMMICKS GALORE OF PEACE
-
No one ever seems to frown on men dating women with bodies like children even if the woman is well past legal age
Keira Knightly looks about 12
(https://c4.wallpaperflare.com/wallpaper/404/219/591/keira-knightley-hot-beach-photoshoot-wallpaper-preview.jpg)
-
Lmao I said the exact same thing in another thread, but the other way around. I thought Matt was being exploited by Bast.
Reading more of their posts it looks like they are just mutually stroking each other off.
"I'm gonna post pro TA posts, back me up on it"
"Okay, but you back me up on my anti Walter posts"
Hang on, I thought I was only swallowing the sperm of Bast through my posts, and not the other way around?
Bast and I are in agreement on the Covid news - which is still big news in Canada, as lockdowns and mandates/measures continue - and I believe Bast and I are in agreement about TA. Not sure on other issues, but definitely Covid, which is a big one [Canada currently has the biggest protest ever as a result of Covid...so...that's kind of a big deal over here].
-
Lmao I said the exact same thing in another thread, but the other way around. I thought Matt was being exploited by Bast.
Reading more of their posts it looks like they are just mutually stroking each other off.
"I'm gonna post pro TA posts, back me up on it"
"Okay, but you back me up on my anti Walter posts"
I have chatted with Matt for years on facebook so we are friends but we don't plan on or tell each other "back me up" or anything like that.
-
Joe Rogan said racist things but does that mean he should be banned from Spotify and social media? I don't approve of the racist things he said like saying that going into a black neighborhood was like being on Planet of the Apes (he said something very close to that). That's obviously hurtful to black people and insensitive. So should he be silenced as punishment? Why can't people just criticize him and if they don't like what he says they don't have to pay to listen/watch him.
-
Keira Knightly looks about 12
(https://c4.wallpaperflare.com/wallpaper/404/219/591/keira-knightley-hot-beach-photoshoot-wallpaper-preview.jpg)
She doesn't look 12. She looks fit and lean.
-
I have chatted with Matt for years on facebook so we are friends but we don't plan on or tell each other "back me up" or anything like that.
Exactly - that's never happened.
I think I linked you to a couple of threads I started, but what was before you were allowed back in to the Bodybuilding Gaylord Club that is Getbig.
In fact, I was saddened when you questioned what has impacted my training motivation lately. It is a daunting task to literally worry about being arrested every time I enter and exit the gym. This is not the sort of shit I want to worry about every time I go to train.
My gym owner also filed a lawsuit against the health unit in my city, and now they are targeting him more than ever.
Again, this is just not the type of thing I want to worry about. It puts me in a foul mood.
-
She doesn't look 12. She looks fit and lean.
I just read that she is 5'7".
If she was 4'11" with that physique...she definitely would though.
Our mutual friend asks: "Does her pussy smell like fish?"
I would say: YES. Absolutely it does.
-
She doesn't look 12. She looks fit and lean.
No, tits no hips...looks immature
She did her first nude scene in "the Hole" at 15, they waited until she was 16 to release the movie
She looked the same as she does in the pic above
-
Why was The True Adonis banned? What did he post about that did it?
Please vote in the poll, and act fast. Voting closes: June 20, 2049, 04:31:16 PM
Same reason you just were...
-
That type of thing makes all the difference, IMO.
That's why in Canada, there are laws, such as - for those of pubescent age, they can have sex with people up to two years older than they are. I.e., a 12-year-old can have sex with a 14-year-old in Canada, I think. Something like that.
If TA was saying a pubescent girl should be able to have sex with a pubescent girl, I wouldn't personally care. But if he was condoning or promoting actual sexual activity that is illegal under American law, then I'd have to agree he should have been banned, especially if he was warned.
There are very few things I think are ban-able offenses, and breaking actual laws is one of them. I personally cannot stand when people accuse other members of pedophilia without evidence, for example, because that is illegal under defamation of character and similar laws, in the USA.
And TA making posts that encourage sex with women actually under legal age to have sex is not something I can condone. I thought maybe he was talking about having sex with women under 20, or something. I just think pedophilia is a massive thing to accuse someone of, and I'm glad this thread got posted.
So TA posted that? ??? Wow. I missed all of that, apparently.
Brutal if true Matt Cawk.
-
Hang on, I thought I was only swallowing the sperm of Bast through my posts, and not the other way around?
Bast and I are in agreement on the Covid news - which is still big news in Canada, as lockdowns and mandates/measures continue - and I believe Bast and I are in agreement about TA. Not sure on other issues, but definitely Covid, which is a big one [Canada currently has the biggest protest ever as a result of Covid...so...that's kind of a big deal over here].
Dont be a jockrider.....follow no one.
It`s fine to admire someone but you make it sound so weird.
-
Same reason you just were...
;D
-
Same reason you just were...
Blast! Bast and I - and a mutual friend [and another former Getbigger] talk about TA's banishment starting at the 3:00 mark here:
Ah well. I'm not to call someone a pedophile without evidence, but I trust Getbig's mod team to not just ban people for no reason. Weird that I never saw posts like that from TA in all the years he posted, but...if he violated the board rules, so be it.
Too bad about Bast too. ;D
-
Brutal if true Matt Cawk.
To be fair...I am a big "Innocent until proven guilty" person.
I don't know if TA had a fling with a 17-year-old girl [which would be legal in NC], or if he said he thinks it's ok for adults to have sex with children [which would absolutely be illegal].
So that's about it. I just think it's fair that we evaluate these things that way
- Matt C
-
Lol it’s weird. Bast is even posting long tirades like Matt.
BUT…
one thing is for sure, we can see that the quality of my posts have taken a step forward if I am mirroring what you’ve posted!
You beat me to it by like 30 mins, so I bow to your superior posting.
Although the hand/ass/puppet thing was definitely one of the great things I first read on here a while back. Can't remember who it was unfortunately to give them credit (Wes maybe)
-
You beat me to it by like 30 mins, so I bow to your superior posting.
Although the hand/ass/puppet thing was definitely one of the great things I first read on here a while back. Can't remember who it was unfortunately to give them credit (Wes maybe)
To be honest, I'm a bit disappointed that Bast worked so hard/fast to get himself banned from here.
As I said - respect goes a long way for me. And regarding you and I, Flexacon - I perceived you as one of these pro-mandate people, who supports the current disaster that may not be happening where you live, but in Canada, I literally need to treat going to the gym like a criminal activity.
I could be selling steroids with less concern. I need medical documentation on hand, and I sneak in and out at late hours. I also had to be an employee in order to go last month, during yet another useless lockdown. And it's all driven by people who take this hyped pandemic seriously. Meanwhile, only 33,717 of 38,613,006 Canadians have died of this virus. That's 1 in 1,145 who died, or, conversely, 99.91% of Canadians survived. Yet, we destroyed 10,000 restaurants alone, approximately an equal number of other SME's, had all sorts of medical procedures postponed or cancelled, and went into one TRILLION dollars in debt.
Now, it's proven beyond ANY doubt that this pandemic isn't killing anyone who isn't a diseased whale or a dinosaur. If you live in an American state, you are probably ok, but in Canada, I have much less confidence about our future.
But that was before I noticed that you were changing your views with new evidence, and realized that you are not a pro-vax diehard who looks at the mainstream narrative on vaccines as gospel.
So that's about it, Flexacon - consider this an apology for misjudging you. I have no problem admitting I'm wrong, and changing my views with new evidence.
As for Bast...I was excited about him coming back, but taking potshots at Ron's body weight almost immediately - not cool. I'm just not a big fan of poking fun of people that way - unless that person is an asshole, or someone who makes fun of the physiques of others [which Ron is not]. I just never really knew Bast to be someone to make fun of someone's weight like that...I was disappointed, and disappointed that he got himself kicked off here so quickly. I was looking forward to his posts, but oh well.
-
But that was before I noticed that you were changing your views with new evidence, and realized that you are not a pro-vax diehard who looks at the mainstream narrative on vaccines as gospel.
So that's about it, Flexacon - consider this an apology for misjudging you. I have no problem admitting I'm wrong, and changing my views with new evidence.
I didn't change my view with the emergence of new evidence because there was no "new" compelling evidence.
I always said they need to let the virus run through the population. I appreciated the fact that a lot of elderly and immunocompromised people wouldn't have a good outcome if this done. Personally I didn't care, but I know most felt different so accepted restrictions until they were vaccinated. That's was done and anything regarding covid restrictions and mandates since then has been pretty retarded.
You should have positioned yourself better to benefit from the shit show (it was pretty clear very early on this would be a shit show), not sit around crying about it like a baby.
-
That type of thing makes all the difference, IMO.
That's why in Canada, there are laws, such as - for those of pubescent age, they can have sex with people up to two years older than they are. I.e., a 12-year-old can have sex with a 14-year-old in Canada, I think. Something like that.
If TA was saying a pubescent girl should be able to have sex with a pubescent girl, I wouldn't personally care. But if he was condoning or promoting actual sexual activity that is illegal under American law, then I'd have to agree he should have been banned, especially if he was warned.
There are very few things I think are ban-able offenses, and breaking actual laws is one of them. I personally cannot stand when people accuse other members of pedophilia without evidence, for example, because that is illegal under defamation of character and similar laws, in the USA.
And TA making posts that encourage sex with women actually under legal age to have sex is not something I can condone. I thought maybe he was talking about having sex with women under 20, or something. I just think pedophilia is a massive thing to accuse someone of, and I'm glad this thread got posted.
So TA posted that? ??? Wow. I missed all of that, apparently.
No need to back paddle now. Now we know how you really feel about sex with minors. Despicable.
-
Why do so many people base their moral stance on "the legal age"
If they lowered the legal age would your moral stance go down with it?
-
Why do so many people base their moral stance on "the legal age"
If they lowered the legal age would your moral stance go down with it?
It´s called a Legal age for a reason dummy. do you like young boys & Girls sounds very suspect ???
-
It´s called a Legal age for a reason dummy. do you like young boys & Girls sounds very suspect ???
they could lower the age of consent to 12 and it would still be wrong. It's not about what the law says, it's about sex with children being wrong. Where the line between child and adult is exactly is a bit fuzzy but 18 is a decent age to draw it.
Anyways, wasnt pellius a bit of a pedophile defender? I don't recall his exact postings on the matter but the accusations dogged him for a while
-
It´s called a Legal age for a reason dummy. do you like young boys & Girls sounds very suspect ???
I know why its the "legal age"
The point is if the "legal age" was decided as 12 then some people would sleep with 13 year olds, thats my point, some people are guided by what the law says not by their moral compass.
I wouldnt sleep with a 25 year old woman who looked like a child, but thats me, many people do though.
This "woman" was 28 in this photo
(https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e122a8be5a5d10f0eb06f1c8efef133c-lq)
-
they could lower the age of consent to 12 and it would still be wrong. It's not about what the law says, it's about sex with children being wrong. Where the line between child and adult is exactly is a bit fuzzy but 18 is a decent age to draw it.
Anyways, wasnt pellius a bit of a pedophile defender? I don't recall his exact postings on the matter but the accusations dogged him for a while
No he wasn't
It was people on here that didnt have the intelligence to work out the difference between a pedophile and a sex offender.
Both are wrong but there is a distinct difference
-
It´s called a Legal age for a reason dummy. do you like young boys & Girls sounds very suspect ???
bro
-
No he wasn't
It was people on here that didnt have the intelligence to work out the difference between a pedophile and a sex offender.
Both are wrong but there is a distinct difference
care to elaborate? Not all sex offenders are pedophiles but all pedophiles are sex offenders?
-
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
Yeah I think that deserves a perm ban no room for pedos here got enough aggressive closet phaggot already
-
Pedos need to be shot having said that dating women significantly younger than you is also lame. It doesn’t make you look cool or young or hip. It makes you look old and pathetic like you can’t find an attractive women your age so have found a younger partner you can control and dominate. Real men can get attractive strong willed women their age they don’t need to find young girls with daddy issues to control.
-
Pedos need to be shot having said that dating women significantly younger than you is also lame. It doesn’t make you look cool or young or hip. It makes you look old and pathetic like you can’t find an attractive women your age so have found a younger partner you can control and dominate. Real men can get attractive strong willed women their age they don’t need to find young girls with daddy issues to control.
Half your age plus 7 is ideal
-
No need to back paddle now. Now we know how you really feel about sex with minors. Despicable.
Did you watch that video around the 3 min mark? Some very questionable statements being made.
-
care to elaborate? Not all sex offenders are pedophiles but all pedophiles are sex offenders?
exactly..
-
No need to back paddle now. Now we know how you really feel about sex with minors. Despicable.
I knew that ultimately something like this would come out from all of Matt Canning’s imbecilic rantings.
Sooner or later he would go beyond his racism and anti-semitism and expose that he is a creepy fucking weirdo who sees nothing wrong with pedophilia.
I understand that he is a retard, but that doesn’t excuse supporting pedophiles and pedophilia. On a board like Getbig that line can never be crossed and when it is, it can’t be tolerated.
-
I knew that ultimately something like this would come out from all of Matt Canning’s imbecilic rantings.
Sooner or later he would go beyond his racism and anti-semitism and expose that he is a creepy fucking weirdo who sees nothing wrong with pedophilia.
I understand that he is a retard, but that doesn’t excuse supporting pedophiles and pedophilia. On a board like Getbig that line can never be crossed and when it is, it can’t be tolerated.
Go back and listen to the vid around the 3 min mark. MATT did not defend ped., so let's not let that falsehood get traction.
-
Pedos need to be shot having said that dating women significantly younger than you is also lame. It doesn’t make you look cool or young or hip. It makes you look old and pathetic like you can’t find an attractive women your age so have found a younger partner you can control and dominate. Real men can get attractive strong willed women their age they don’t need to find young girls with daddy issues to control.
This
-
exactly..
no you were commenting on the age of consent, which is clearly defined by law. The law quite rightly defines when legal sex is Law to protect mainly the young woman who might be under puberty. Your statment clearly asked if sex was under the now legal age would it change our opinions or be OK. you Sir are a closet ....
-
no you were commenting on the age of consent, which is clearly defined by law. The law quite rightly defines when legal sex is Law to protect mainly the young woman who might be under puberty. Your statment clearly asked if sex was under the now legal age would it change our opinions or be OK. you Sir are a closet ....
I was asking a question not making a statement , the question mark was a bit of a giveaway.
I know its not easy discusing this from a purely objective point because of the subject matter but try not to over react by making silly accusations.
The point I am making is that the law dictates some peoples choices and that for some it doesnt.
I make my choices on the appearance of a woman, I dont pick children, I pick adults and it has nothing to do with what the law says it is.
The age of consent varies all over the world but mainly its 16, its 16 because the majority of law makers believe that an individual is mature enough to make informed consent at that point in their lives.
-
Yeah I think that deserves a perm ban no room for pedos here got enough aggressive closet phaggot already
YOU HAVE NOT BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH TO MAKE SUCH A DEMAND...........NOOB.
-
Go back and listen to the vid around the 3 min mark. MATT did not defend ped., so let's not let that falsehood get traction.
We don't agree on much but this is textbook moderating. Kudos to you Princess.
-
In a nuthell,anyone that has sex or molests a child hould be castrated and then skowly tortured daily.
-
Multiple posts about sex with underage girls and vehement defense of such acts, was given plenty of time and posts to consider his position. He chose to push the hard line in favor of this type of behaviour, not cool.
he seemed like the typical trust fund rich kid with no common sense and spoiled. Much like bhank.
-
It makes you look old and pathetic like you can’t find an attractive women your age so have found a younger partner you can control and dominate. Real men can get attractive strong willed women their age they don’t need to find young girls with daddy issues to control.
This guy giving advice on women is like shizzo giving diet & exercise advice, or Matt C giving parenting advice.
-
Did you watch that video around the 3 min mark? Some very questionable statements being made.
Those are three guys that I would not let around most people.
-
I knew that ultimately something like this would come out from all of Matt Canning’s imbecilic rantings.
Sooner or later he would go beyond his racism and anti-semitism and expose that he is a creepy fucking weirdo who sees nothing wrong with pedophilia.
I understand that he is a retard, but that doesn’t excuse supporting pedophiles and pedophilia. On a board like Getbig that line can never be crossed and when it is, it can’t be tolerated.
It’s a sad day indeed when Shizzo is a better poster than someone (Matt).
Matt is the worst of the worst—i dont think I have ever read a single post of his in their entirety.
-
No worries. I lurked and/or posted anonymously (when we could back then) for years before I joined. Were you at least lurking during Jay's Olympia's when we all did our best to sucker people into threads about him that turned out to be a fridge or freezer. Those were some fucking classics, and very creative.
Same here. When the guest feature was turned off, I was forced to make an account. Hence the name.
-
he seemed like the typical trust fund rich kid with no common sense and spoiled. Much like bhank.
Don’t start grouping with pedos duckface that’s not cool I won’t even date women more than 5 years younger. I already shared my opinion about sleep age preying on younger women much less girls
-
Don’t start grouping with pedos duckface that’s not cool I won’t even date women more than 5 years younger. I already shared my opinion about sleep age preying on younger women much less girls
(https://c.tenor.com/Cktt9J4kTzIAAAAd/no-one-cares-i-dont-care.gif)
-
Pedos need to be shot having said that dating women significantly younger than you is also lame. It doesn’t make you look cool or young or hip. It makes you look old and pathetic like you can’t find an attractive women your age so have found a younger partner you can control and dominate. Real men can get attractive strong willed women their age they don’t need to find young girls with daddy issues to control.
so any older guy that ever looked at a playboy magazine is a perve?
E
-
so any older guy that ever looked at a playboy magazine is a perve?
E
Do you understand the difference between being in a relationship with a woman and lusting after her
-
It’s a sad day indeed when Shizzo is a better poster than someone
I might be in the minority here, but I think Shizzo is better than a couple of posters.
"1"
-
I might be in the minority here, but I think Shizzo is better than a couple of posters.
"1"
yes good sir, you are in the minority
probably a very good dude (shizz), just horrible at this internet stuff :D
-
I might be in the minority here, but I think Shizzo is better than a couple of posters.
"1"
Do not, I repeat do not reveal the identity of these other posters.
It would be too much for them to take.
-
Do not, I repeat do not reveal the identity of these other posters.
It would be too much for them to take.
Do Howard and OAK not count?
"1"
-
Do Howard and OAK not count?
"1"
they never counted...
-
Do Howard and OAK not count?
"1"
Oh I thought you were serious for a minute there....
-
Oh I thought you were serious for a minute there....
Haha!
"1"
-
At least Howard & Oak have personalities. Shizzo is nothing but white noise
-
I’m going to side with OMR here.
Shizzo is a better poster than the Marty Champions gimmick.
Shizzo is also a better poster than….
Okay Shizzo is at least better than one current poster.
-
Do you understand the difference between being in a relationship with a woman and lusting after her
yeah one guy has the relationship, the other guy wants the relationship, that's the difference
women in their 20's are in their prime years for appearance and fertility, hence them being the most desired by all men
please stop with this nonsense that older men are supposed to prefer older women that are past their prime years and are infertile, gray, and wrinkled
on top of that older women are more likely to have major baggage like being divorced or being single moms, or have rode the cock carousel for years and now wants to "settle down" with some chump that's willing to pay for her past mistakes
funny how in today's world we have to think gay is normal and cool, transgender is brave and courageous, but an older man that wants a young woman in her prime... that's "gross and perverted"
E
-
yeah one guy has the relationship, the other guy wants the relationship, that's the difference
women in their 20's are in their prime years for appearance and fertility, hence them being the most desired by all men
please stop with this nonsense that older men are supposed to prefer older women that are past their prime years and are infertile, gray, and wrinkled
on top of that older women are more likely to have major baggage like being divorced or being single moms, or have rode the cock carousel for years and now wants to "settle down" with some chump that's willing to pay for her past mistakes
funny how in today's world we have to think gay is normal and cool, transgender is brave and courageous, but an older man that wants a young woman in her prime... that's "gross and perverted"
E
you sound a bit insecure...
Guys who have multiple partners are cool dudes, women do it and shes a slut?
-
you sound a bit insecure...
Guys who have multiple partners are cool dudes, women do it and shes a slut?
you sound a bit like a male feminist...
men and women are not the same despite what your lib friends tell you
for one thing guys have to earn their sex so yes they have to be cool dudes, women just show up with no effort whatsoever and they don't have the sex drives that men have
women lose their ability to pair bond the more partners they have, making her a poor long term partner
E
-
you sound a bit like a male feminist...
men and women are not the same despite what your lib friends tell you
for one thing guys have to earn their sex so yes they have to be cool dudes, women just show up with no effort whatsoever and they don't have the sex drives that men have
women lose their ability to pair bond the more partners they have, making her a poor long term partner
E
Never in the hisory of the internet has a post been so wrong.. ;D
-
you sound a bit insecure...
Guys who have multiple partners are cool dudes, women do it and shes a slut?
Cool dudes and lucky dudes, but how many dudes do you think actually have that? And I'm going to narrow it down to multiple attractive partners. So how many cool and lucky dudes have that? I'd say less than 1%
-
Cool dudes and lucky dudes, but how many dudes do you think actually have that? And I'm going to narrow it down to multiple attractive partners. So how many cool and lucky dudes have that? I'd say less than 1%
Thats not the point of the post
Men who sleep with multiple women get respect (from other men)
Women who sleep with multiple men dont.
-
Thats not the point of the post
Men who sleep with multiple women get respect (from other men)
Women who sleep with multiple men dont.
explain why women that sleep with multiple men should get respect
do you think a woman with 100 sex partners would be just as good of a girlfriend or wife as a woman with less than 5?
E
-
explain why women that sleep with multiple men should get respect
do you think a woman with 100 sex partners would be just as good of a girlfriend or wife as a woman with less than 5?
E
Im not suggesting they should, Im saying that men should be treated in the same slut shamed way.
And a woman who has had sex with 100 men as opposed to 5 would very likely be better at sex, practice makes perfect after all
Why would having sex with other people make her any less of a potential girlfriend or wife?
Its just men with fragile egos who want their wives to be almost a virgin
-
Thats not the point of the post
Men who sleep with multiple women get respect (from other men)
Women who sleep with multiple men dont.
Alright makes sense, and yes that does seep of men's inscurity.
-
Im not suggesting they should, Im saying that men should be treated in the same slut shamed way.
And a woman who has had sex with 100 men as opposed to 5 would very likely be better at sex, practice makes perfect after all
Why would having sex with other people make her any less of a potential girlfriend or wife?
Its just men with fragile egos who want their wives to be almost a virgin
why should they be slut shamed the same way? again you are pretending men and women are the same
practice makes perfect? if the woman with 100 partners was so good why can't she lock down any of them? either she isn't that good or it goes back to her not being able to pair bond
men with fragile egos? yep everything is the man's fault, how dare a man have standards and not want a woman with god knows how many cocks inside of her he should love her no matter what...
E
-
why should they be slut shamed the same way? again you are pretending men and women are the same
practice makes perfect? if the woman with 100 partners was so good why can't she lock down any of them? either she isn't that good or it goes back to her not being able to pair bond
men with fragile egos? yep everything is the man's fault, how dare a man have standards and not want a woman with god knows how many cocks inside of her he should love her no matter what...
E
You must not be very confident with your sexual ability. Confident men don't worry about past partners because they know they do it best ;)
-
You must not be very confident with your sexual ability. Confident men don't worry about past partners because they know they do it best ;)
a confident man has standards, sorry you can't relate
E
-
a confident man has standards, sorry you can't relate
E
That's a crook of shit :D Confidence has zero, nada, nothing to do with ethics/standards.
-
That's a crook of shit :D Confidence has zero, nada, nothing to do with ethics/standards.
if you had ethics and standards you wouldn't want the wannabe porn star as your girlfriend or wife
E
-
if you had ethics and standards you wouldn't want the wannabe porn star as your girlfriend or wife
E
Could be, but again.... ethics and standards have nothing to do with confidence.
-
Could be, but again.... ethics and standards have nothing to do with confidence.
i think they do
E
-
why should they be slut shamed the same way? again you are pretending men and women are the same
practice makes perfect? if the woman with 100 partners was so good why can't she lock down any of them? either she isn't that good or it goes back to her not being able to pair bond
men with fragile egos? yep everything is the man's fault, how dare a man have standards and not want a woman with god knows how many cocks inside of her he should love her no matter what...
E
Maybe she didnt want to, maybe she liked being single, why would you assume a woman would want a permenant man in her life?
The way you talk about women is disgusting, I imagine you are either single or a controlling husband
-
Maybe she didnt want to, maybe she liked being single, why would you assume a woman would want a permenant man in her life?
The way you talk about women is disgusting, I imagine you are either single or a controlling husband
He has trouble with women. It's obvious.
I've had sex with over 100 women. Not because i couldn't keep them around, but because i like the feeling of conquering new vagina. It's a game to me. I enjoy the "chase" of a new relationship.
Never once was concerned how many they were with.
Most women are whores and they would never tell the truth anyway.
-
Never once was concerned how many they were with.
That's confidence, kudos to you sir.
-
I’m going to side with OMR here.
Shizzo is a better poster than the Marty Champions gimmick.
Shizzo is also a better poster than….
Okay Shizzo is at least better than one current poster.
The spastic tarted cvunt is the worst poster going right now.
-
I'm biased, of course, because TA introduced me to GetBig.
Great guy.
I think your loyalty is commendable, if misplaced.
*You* are a great guy. Abeles...he always struck me as a poser, an inveterate blowhard who carried his teenaged insecurities well into adulthood.
Some, if not a great deal, of that stemmed from the fact he apparently inherited a great deal of wealth. Adam thought himself very clever, but he let that influx of money swell his bat-eared noggin to BHankian proportions and, well...as a wise old black man formerly of my employ was fond of saying, "You take a man who think he know everything, and you got a man who don't know a goddamn thing."
Motives aside, it was always hilarious when Adam shifted into pseudo-intellectual mode :) The harder he tried, the more he exposed his ignorance.
I can't speak to what he said about fucking younger girls, but I do recall him yammering about NC's "age of consent" from time to time.
Whatever :/
All I can say is, by the time I was a senior as an undergrad, yeah, the freshmen girls were still attractive, but there remained a bit of cognitive dissonance there...they were noticeably younger and something in me felt as if I'd be taking advantage of them.
By contrast, the very idea of porking a hot to trot 16-year-old was almost anathematic. They certainly could have stirred my 20-21 something y.o. loins, but, no matter the legality, my morals would have screamed "no."
-
Maybe she didnt want to, maybe she liked being single, why would you assume a woman would want a permenant man in her life?
The way you talk about women is disgusting, I imagine you are either single or a controlling husband
because women always benefit from marriage, they have everything to gain and nothing to lose so of course they want to get married
why did she need 100 sexual partners, if you really think that is normal and acceptable for a woman i don't know what to tell you
does your girl or daughter have only fans or something?
i am only disgusting to you because you are a male feminist that thinks men aren't allowed to have standards while you support women having a grocery list of standards for men, women are disgusted by you :)
E
-
He has trouble with women. It's obvious.
I've had sex with over 100 women. Not because i couldn't keep them around, but because i like the feeling of conquering new vagina. It's a game to me. I enjoy the "chase" of a new relationship.
Never once was concerned how many they were with.
Most women are whores and they would never tell the truth anyway.
you say most women are whores and i'm the one that has problems with women ???
E
-
No shame in this game
-
I’m going to side with OMR here.
Shizzo is a better poster than the Marty Champions gimmick.
Shizzo is also a better poster than….
Okay Shizzo is at least better than one current poster.
;D
-
Bast and myself and another friend are trying to get to the bottom of what TA did in this video:
Ultimately, I'd have to read what TA said. But I can't agree that Jeffrey Epstein "did nothing wrong".