Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Agnostic007 on June 18, 2023, 12:08:12 AM
-
Coach has stated on record that I was not in law enforcement and specifically I was not a Detective. I have issued a $20K challenge to Coach to put his money where his mouth is.
You know Coach. You know me.
I am 100% sure Coach will back peddle. He knows I am who I say I am but got caught up in the politics. Now that he is called out and it would cost him money.. is he really that dense?
Here is what Coach had to say.
"Ok, I’m going on the record right now by saying there is no way in the world you even close to being a “detective” and you even being in law enforcement is questionable. Sorry dude, not just me, but quite a few others have posted what Comey has found so far through oversight’s investigations."
So, I'm putting up $20K against a guy who still believes the election was stolen. Any one else want a piece of it?
Coach...Hit it me up in messages for my banking info... Or you can simply apologize for making a statement you can't back up. 20K or accept responsibility
Coach has said in the past that the election was stolen. Didn't cost him a dime. But with $20K on the line.. will Coach be so bold? Something tells me we are about to see some serious crawfishing :)
-
If you are a real Detective then tell me what I'm thinking about right now.
-
Coach has stated on record that I was not in law enforcement and specifically I was not a Detective. I have issued a $20K challenge to Coach to put his money where his mouth is.
You know Coach. You know me.
I am 100% sure Coach will back peddle. He knows I am who I say I am but got caught up in the politics. Now that he is called out and it would cost him money.. is he really that dense?
Here is what Coach had to say.
"Ok, I’m going on the record right now by saying there is no way in the world you even close to being a “detective” and you even being in law enforcement is questionable. Sorry dude, not just me, but quite a few others have posted what Comey has found so far through oversight’s investigations."
So, I'm putting up $20K against a guy who still believes the election was stolen. Any one else want a piece of it?
Coach...Hit it me up in messages for my banking info... Or you can simply apologize for making a statement you can't back up. 20K or accept responsibility
Coach has said in the past that the election was stolen. Didn't cost him a dime. But with $20K on the line.. will Coach be so bold? Something tells me we are about to see some serious crawfishing :)
Wow !!! 20k :o I totally believe you were a police detective 100%
I'll message you my bank details & claim the money 💰 🙏 😊
OK.
-
More Law "Enfarcement" than "Enforcement". To those who know, JDLR, buckwheat. You are a joke. You are a cuck. And if you were in any way a LEO I am glad you're retired.
You are a phiserman, that much is obvious. This isn't the real world but you sure are curious about that which is none of your bidness. You support a filthy, dementia riddled racist and the party of pedophiles and child mutilatiors. Everyone here knows exactly what that says about you and your enablers here. By that self-professed association you are disgusting.
You are "friends" with LMN and you and your rollers think yourselves "clever". You are flies and flies eat shit and bother people. Given your politics, I would guess you've called a suspect a "BM" more than once in your career and thought yourself clever. This slang word for "Detective" has been around for decades and desribes you perfectly.
You are a dick.
-
This is a real detective...
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/HighlevelGenuineGorilla-size_restricted.gif)
-
I can confirm the name and info Agnostic sent me was an officer and a detective.
-
I can confirm the name and info Agnostic sent me was an officer and a detective.
Ohhhh.... poor Qoach. Wrong again. No surprise really.
Epic owning.
-
If you are a real Detective then tell me what I'm thinking about right now.
Women..
-
Women..
have you sent me the 20k yet ?? ;D
-
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
-
Women..
Dam, you are psychic.
I was thinking about her...
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/22/08/442208137c715383876b1eb53ca519e8.jpg)
-
show us on the doll where Coach hurt you?? Is it your grommet?? Captain Butthurt??
-
Dam, you are psychic.
I was thinking about her...
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/22/08/442208137c715383876b1eb53ca519e8.jpg)
And I don't blame you ,
I am Now 😊
-
If you are a real Detective then tell me what I'm thinking about right now.
You are wondering if he was/is a 'real dectective'... am I right? Or, you could be counting reps.
-
Dam, you are psychic.
I was thinking about her...
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/22/08/442208137c715383876b1eb53ca519e8.jpg)
And what were you thinking about her? Were you wondering if she is a natural blond or if her boobs are balloons filled with silicone. You could also be wondering if she is actually a she, since most real women with tits have hips and an ass, like in the song from a Chorus Line, 2:17.
-
Dam, you are psychic.
I was thinking about her...
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/22/08/442208137c715383876b1eb53ca519e8.jpg)
That ass is flatter than bhanks chest.
-
Coach has stated on record that I was not in law enforcement and specifically I was not a Detective. I have issued a $20K challenge to Coach to put his money where his mouth is.
You know Coach. You know me.
I am 100% sure Coach will back peddle. He knows I am who I say I am but got caught up in the politics. Now that he is called out and it would cost him money.. is he really that dense?
Here is what Coach had to say.
"Ok, I’m going on the record right now by saying there is no way in the world you even close to being a “detective” and you even being in law enforcement is questionable. Sorry dude, not just me, but quite a few others have posted what Comey has found so far through oversight’s investigations."
So, I'm putting up $20K against a guy who still believes the election was stolen. Any one else want a piece of it?
Coach...Hit it me up in messages for my banking info... Or you can simply apologize for making a statement you can't back up. 20K or accept responsibility
Coach has said in the past that the election was stolen. Didn't cost him a dime. But with $20K on the line.. will Coach be so bold? Something tells me we are about to see some serious crawfishing :)
So you want to prove to an internet stranger what you once did for a living. You sound pretty insecure.
-
Nobody is surprised. Liberals in law enforcement have ruined the country. That's from the beat cop in St. Louis all the way to Merrick Garland.
-
So you want to prove to an internet stranger what you once did for a living. You sound pretty insecure.
Funny how you got that from the post and not;
Coach has yet again posted a falsehood and once again got called out and has suddenly lost his voice. He wanted to go on record, he's on record.
-
Nobody is surprised. Liberals in law enforcement have ruined the country. That's from the beat cop in St. Louis all the way to Merrick Garland.
And no one is surprised a right winger said something false and got called on it.
-
Funny how you got that from the post and not;
Coach has yet again posted a falsehood and once again got called out and has suddenly lost his voice. He wanted to go on record, he's on record.
Yeah. Good point. If you were a teenager. I can see a high school kid wanting to prove something to an internet stranger. Not a retired professional. It's not a good look.
-
And no one is surprised a right winger said something false and got called on it.
" God Save The Queen " ;D :D ;D :D
-
Yeah. Good point. If you were a teenager. I can see a high school kid wanting to prove something to an internet stranger. Not a retired professional. It's not a good look.
Constantly being wrong, posting links that get you busted, and resorting to lying about the person on the other end of an argument isn't a good look either. Somehow I think Agnostic came out of this looking better than Qoach.
-
Dam, you are psychic.
I was thinking about her...
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/22/08/442208137c715383876b1eb53ca519e8.jpg)
www.wifeysworld.com
-
Ok Officer - are you enjoying your 401K decline? why is a borderless border a good thing ??
-
Coach has stated on record that I was not in law enforcement and specifically I was not a Detective. I have issued a $20K challenge to Coach to put his money where his mouth is.
You know Coach. You know me.
No, No one knows who you really are. I've been on here for over 20 years and don't know who you are. Me, on the other hand, everyone knows who I am. What I look like, where I train, where I live (no, not exact address), who my wife is, what my businesses are, etc. Some on here know me personally from being on here. I'm pretty much an open book.
I am 100% sure Coach will back peddle. He knows I am who I say I am but got caught up in the politics. Now that he is called out and it would cost him money.. is he really that dense?
I don't take bets I'm not 100% sure of. That being said, Chaos stated along time ago that you verified with him. I go strictly off your posts and and you how you come to your conclusions based on the evidence I provide, that you don't read and the lack of evidence you attempt to provide and draw your conclusions on such as "fact-check" sites which most, even in the media, don't use because most have been debunked. Thats just one reason why I find it hard to believe you were in LE. For being a former 'Detective" you don't seem to have the ability to gather evidence from both sides and at draw logical conclusion and THIS is why liberals like yourself ALWAYS lose the political arguments at the end when it all comes out.
You seem to not have the ability to see (that being in LE) that we have a two tiered "justice" systems that only favors the ruling class...Soviet style. This is second reason why I find it hard to believe.
Here is what Coach had to say.
"Ok, I’m going on the record right now by saying there is no way in the world you even close to being a “detective” and you even being in law enforcement is questionable. Sorry dude, not just me, but quite a few others have posted what Comey has found so far through oversight’s investigations."
So, I'm putting up $20K against a guy who still believes the election was stolen. Any one else want a piece of it?
Coach...Hit it me up in messages for my banking info... Or you can simply apologize for making a statement you can't back up. 20K or accept responsibility
Coach has said in the past that the election was stolen. Didn't cost him a dime. But with $20K on the line.. will Coach be so bold? Something tells me we are about to see some serious crawfishing :)
Yes, the election was stolen. Period. There's more proof this election was stolen than proof he legit won. He didn't. He was installed.
Your insecurity shows big time.
Your turn
-
HAHAHAHHAAHA..... chaos even confirmed in the past that Agnostic was who he said he was and Qoach didn't accept simple facts then.
Sort of like when chaos and OMR confirmed that I had no other gimmick accounts or shared accounts on here and Qoach was still claiming afterwards I had.
Obviously, Qoach believes chaos lies quite often. ::)
But what do you expect from someone claiming the election was stolen?
-
Your insecurity shows big time.
Your turn
Let's set the record straight. I don't have "Detective007" as my screen name. You don't have your name as your screen name but you use "Coach". Who is drawing more attention to what they do/did?
I rarely talk about my former career other than on the occasion someone posts Law Enforcement related articles and I have some experience in that subject.
YOU brought up the detective thing and how you think I'm lying. you and your gang are trying to spin it like I have some need to prove who I was. When you "went on record" calling me a liar I suppose I could have ignored you, but I chose not to. You posting false information gets old. When it's about me, I'll speak up.
So rather than my insecurity showing, perhaps it's your inability to discern fact from fiction, which gets you in trouble on the forum almost daily.
-
Big Tech censorship at te request of the FBI of Biden corruption is a proven fact now. Same with all the covid lies and censorship, etc - its been shown that if even 5% or less changed their minds the election outcome would have bee n different. The liars in the CIA and FBI who issued the letter before the debate on the taptop was used to shield Biden from obvious corruption.
Undeniable FACTS
Coach has stated on record that I was not in law enforcement and specifically I was not a Detective. I have issued a $20K challenge to Coach to put his money where his mouth is.
You know Coach. You know me.
I am 100% sure Coach will back peddle. He knows I am who I say I am but got caught up in the politics. Now that he is called out and it would cost him money.. is he really that dense?
Here is what Coach had to say.
"Ok, I’m going on the record right now by saying there is no way in the world you even close to being a “detective” and you even being in law enforcement is questionable. Sorry dude, not just me, but quite a few others have posted what Comey has found so far through oversight’s investigations."
So, I'm putting up $20K against a guy who still believes the election was stolen. Any one else want a piece of it?
Coach...Hit it me up in messages for my banking info... Or you can simply apologize for making a statement you can't back up. 20K or accept responsibility
Coach has said in the past that the election was stolen. Didn't cost him a dime. But with $20K on the line.. will Coach be so bold? Something tells me we are about to see some serious crawfishing :)
-
Let's set the record straight. I don't have "Detective007" as my screen name. You don't have your name as your screen name but you use "Coach". Who is drawing more attention to what they do/did?
I rarely talk about my former career other than on the occasion someone posts Law Enforcement related articles and I have some experience in that subject.
YOU brought up the detective thing and how you think I'm lying. you and your gang are trying to spin it like I have some need to prove who I was. When you "went on record" calling me a liar I suppose I could have ignored you, but I chose not to. You posting false information gets old. When it's about me, I'll speak up.
So rather than my insecurity showing, perhaps it's your inability to discern fact from fiction, which gets you in trouble on the forum almost daily.
I don’t have a “gang”. I’m saying if you were detective you would use your skills to at least not debate like the average yaahoo liberal off the street that uses the same mainstream media liberal talking points. Shit, you can’t even admit there’s a two tiered justice system (as we once again, saw today) because you’re blind to the opposing evidence.
-
I don’t have a “gang”. I’m saying if you were detective you would use your skills to at least not debate like the average yaahoo liberal off the street that uses the same mainstream media liberal talking points. Shit, you can’t even admit there’s a two tiered justice system (as we once again, saw today) because you’re blind to the opposing evidence.
So you doubt I was a Detective because I come to different conclusions than you based on the available information. That might have more to do with your weaknesses than mine.
For example, YOU still say the election was stolen. Even after all the evidence to the contrary. I find it almost laughable that you have the gonads to challenge anyones ability to examine facts and draw conclusions when you are standing there with that claim around your neck wearing it like a Special Olympics medal
I just can't take a person seriously who thought Rudy Guliani was going to save the day..
-
So you doubt I was a Detective because I come to different conclusions than you based on the available information. That might have more to do with your weaknesses than mine.
For example, YOU still say the election was stolen. Even after all the evidence to the contrary. I find it almost laughable that you have the gonads to challenge anyones ability to examine facts and draw conclusions when you are standing there with that claim around your neck wearing it like a Special Olympics medal
I just can't take a person seriously who thought Rudy Guliani was going to save the day..
It’s not even a different conclusion. It’s parroting every liberal talking point. How can you come to a conclusion if you can’t even look at all of the surrounding evidence?
Not even sure what the Guliani reference was about.
-
Big Tech censorship at te request of the FBI of Biden corruption is a proven fact now. Same with all the covid lies and censorship, etc - its been shown that if even 5% or less changed their minds the election outcome would have bee n different. The liars in the CIA and FBI who issued the letter before the debate on the taptop was used to shield Biden from obvious corruption.
Undeniable FACTS
This is always conveniently ignored.
-
This is always conveniently ignored.
Of course it it is - remember when Biden blatantly lied about it in the debate citing the fake letter? That was all orchestrated and a fix by the FBI and CIA to shield Biden from the truthful claims of corruption and bribery and corruption that were exposed on the laptop.
For a supposed detective - Agnostic sucks!
-
I don’t have a “gang”. I’m saying if you were detective you would use your skills to at least not debate like the average yaahoo liberal off the street that uses the same mainstream media liberal talking points. Shit, you can’t even admit there’s a two tiered justice system (as we once again, saw today) because you’re blind to the opposing evidence.
He is a detective. You are a moron. Big difference. You denying it doesn't automatically make it a fact. You can deny it and make excuses but at the end of the day he still was a detective. And the election wasn't stolen.
Unless you are calling chaos a liar.
-
He is a detective. You are a moron. Big difference. You denying it doesn't automatically make it a fact. You can deny it and make excuses but at the end of the day he still was a detective. And the election wasn't stolen.
Unless you are calling chaos a liar.
It wasnt stolen in the sense of machine results being overturned - but it was a fraud based upon the FBI and CIA rigging it in terms of supressing information damaging to Biden. That is not even debatable any more.
-
Nobody is surprised. Liberals in law enforcement have ruined the country. That's from the beat cop in St. Louis all the way to Merrick Garland.
What percentage of folks in law enforcement are liberal verses conservative?
Garland is considered a judicial moderate and a centrist. Garland has been described as "a moderate liberal, with a definite pro-prosecution bent in criminal cases".
Specifically, how have liberals in law enforcement ruined the (this) county.
-
It wasnt stolen in the sense of machine results being overturned - but it was a fraud based upon the FBI and CIA rigging it in terms of supressing information damaging to Biden. That is not even debatable any more.
Yep
-
HAHAHAHHAAHA..... chaos even confirmed in the past that Agnostic was who he said he was and Qoach didn't accept simple facts then.
Sort of like when chaos and OMR confirmed that I had no other gimmick accounts or shared accounts on here and Qoach was still claiming afterwards I had.
Obviously, Qoach believes chaos lies quite often. ::)
But what do you expect from someone claiming the election was stolen?
Quote from: Lartinos on May 12, 2023, 06:39:01 PM
The pedos get called out and don’t even try to defend their disgusting existence.
[/quote]
Are you referring to StrawBitch / GroomingForBoys / TheOak / Pashtun Afghanistani/ WayneTracker ?
-
It wasnt stolen in the sense of machine results being overturned - but it was a fraud based upon the FBI and CIA rigging it in terms of supressing information damaging to Biden. That is not even debatable any more.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA. GTFO with that weak shit. I guess you missed all the lawsuits and "fraudits" where machines were blamed, ballots were blamed, etc... etc...
Trumpy lost a fair election. Get over it. Continuing to say otherwise only means you are stupid.
-
To be clear, Agnostic sent info on someone that was retired LE, could have been anyone's info. :D
Have fun boys!
-
To be clear, Agnostic sent info on someone that was retired LE, could have been anyone's info. :D
Have fun boys!
LOL!! Stir the pot!
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. GTFO with that weak shit. I guess you missed all the lawsuits and "fraudits" where machines were blamed, ballots were blamed, etc... etc...
Trumpy lost a fair election. Get over it. Continuing to say otherwise only means you are stupid.
Yes Biden won. No it wasn't fair. It is undisputed that people from the "intelligence community," the media, and big tech conspired to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, and that polls show had the story not been suppressed the election results likely would have been different.
-
To be clear, Agnostic sent info on someone that was retired LE, could have been anyone's info. :D
Have fun boys!
Agnostic will not like this. It's very important to him that Coach believes him. What little kid hijacked Agnostic's account??
-
Agnostic will not like this. It's very important to him that Coach believes him. What little kid hijacked Agnostic's account??
Has Agnostic given his official detective opinion on the crimes that the Presidents kid pled guilty to to avoid publicly embarrassing his father?
-
Yes Biden won. No it wasn't fair. It is undisputed that people from the "intelligence community," the media, and big tech conspired to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, and that polls show had the story not been suppressed the election results likely would have been different.
You mean like the pay off and suppression of the porn star affair/story would have changed the minds of evangelists and christian/pro marriage voters.
It was fair. He lost. Get over it.
-
Yes Biden won. No it wasn't fair. It is undisputed that people from the "intelligence community," the media, and big tech conspired to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, and that polls show had the story not been suppressed the election results likely would have been different.
What do the polls say now about Mr. "I DID NOTHING WRONG!" Trump's chances of winning the general in 2024?
-
And no one is surprised a right winger said something false and got called on it.
Sure.... The superiority complex makes more sense now. Most cops have these issues. Many of them eventually become ex-cops due to it.
-
All cops become ex-cops one way or another. ::)
-
All cops become ex-cops one way or another. ::)
You live here. That was instantaneous. :D
Maybe he got defunded? ;D
-
What do the polls say now about Mr. "I DID NOTHING WRONG!" Trump's chances of winning the general in 2024?
Pretty even odds even after the partisan witch-hunt perpetuated by the fraudful demoncrats. Pretty sad actually that the government is stooping to these levels.
Better question is this...if you owned a business and a couple of 75+ year old men came in for a job, would you hire them? Probably not. Then why do we let them lead our country?
-
To be clear, Agnostic sent info on someone that was retired LE, could have been anyone's info. :D
Have fun boys!
Certainly possible.. but highly unlikely. I have been a member since Jan 2004. So for almost 30 years, I would have had to keep up a charade, being consistent, and borrowed an ID to further the deception. Now I get that for Coach, it makes perfect sense that I would go through all that for no gain whatsoever. It's not like cops are looked up to in this forum, in fact, as you can see from some comments it's quite the opposite. But that was a pretty funny stir the pot post :)
-
It’s not even a different conclusion. It’s parroting every liberal talking point. How can you come to a conclusion if you can’t even look at all of the surrounding evidence?
Not even sure what the Guliani reference was about.
Back in 2020 I spent a good amount of time following the election results and the aftermath. I read more than my share of articles about the accusations. Followed the investigations, the lawsuits. Time after time after time, I found the blustering claims by Trump and his minions were blown out of the water by their own party, their own party officials, their own party judges, their own party Attorney General and Vice President. The "Surrounding evidence" was baseless, like Mr. Pillows claims, Gulianis claims, The Krackens claims. So it really is that we came to a different conclusion. Because I looked at likely everything you did but was able to tell the difference between provable facts and allegations. Probably from my experience as a Detective.
Det. Agnostic
-
You mean like the pay off and suppression of the porn star affair/story would have changed the minds of evangelists and christian/pro marriage voters.
It was fair. He lost. Get over it.
He lost. I'm over it. But the facts show the outcome would likely have been different without the suppression of the Hunter laptop story.
-
What do the polls say now about Mr. "I DID NOTHING WRONG!" Trump's chances of winning the general in 2024?
Go check the Rasmussen poll I posted today in the 2024 Election thread.
-
Pretty even odds even after the partisan witch-hunt perpetuated by the fraudful demoncrats. Pretty sad actually that the government is stooping to these levels.
Better question is this...if you owned a business and a couple of 75+ year old men came in for a job, would you hire them? Probably not. Then why do we let them lead our country?
Ever hear about age discrimination laws? Better have a damn good reason not to hire them. Just saying.
Once I was not hired for a position for which was the most qualified applicant. When I asked why, I was told the person they chose had "more energy." She was 30 years old, and I was in my mid-sixties. Their little age discrimination mistake cost the district $10k. which I banked. That high energy person was constantly out sick. I'm not sure if they let her go or if she quit when she ran out of sick leave. So much for her 'high energy'. Either way, I out lasted her.
If you follow my posts here, you know I do not favor old men for extremely stressful jobs like President which require the holder to be sharp as a tack. So, guess you are preaching to the choir.
-
Back in 2020 I spent a good amount of time following the election results and the aftermath. I read more than my share of articles about the accusations. Followed the investigations, the lawsuits. Time after time after time, I found the blustering claims by Trump and his minions were blown out of the water by their own party, their own party officials, their own party judges, their own party Attorney General and Vice President. The "Surrounding evidence" was baseless, like Mr. Pillows claims, Gulianis claims, The Krackens claims. So it really is that we came to a different conclusion. Because I looked at likely everything you did but was able to tell the difference between provable facts and allegations. Probably from my experience as a Detective.
Det. Agnostic
So that means you reviewed the Pennsylvania case where the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits and granted an injunction, only to be overruled by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a technical basis (i.e., not on the merits)? What is your take on that case?
-
Of course it it is - remember when Biden blatantly lied about it in the debate citing the fake letter? That was all orchestrated and a fix by the FBI and CIA to shield Biden from the truthful claims of corruption and bribery and corruption that were exposed on the laptop.
For a supposed detective - Agnostic sucks!
Once again, this is ignored as well. They got the 51 signatures knowing full well at the time of procuring them that the laptop was real. Biden knew it was real.
Then he flat out lied in the debate.
And, as far as I know, nobody has questioned this to KJP or anyone. Could be wrong.
-
Once again, this is ignored as well. They got the 51 signatures knowing full well at the time of procuring them that the laptop was real. Biden knew it was real.
Then he flat out lied in the debate.
And, as far as I know, nobody has questioned this to KJP or anyone. Could be wrong.
She wouldn't answer if anyone asked. They don't have to address stuff like this. The media gives them cover.
-
You live here. That was instantaneous. :D
Maybe he got defunded? ;D
Sue me for being online. ::)
You seem to really worry about how I spend my time. Probably going to frustrate you to know that it isn't thinking about you.
-
He lost. I'm over it. But the facts show the outcome would likely have been different without the suppression of the Hunter laptop story.
No it wouldn't. Just like the cheating affair suppression would not have swayed enough people to vote against Trumpy.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda,..... but it didn't. All that is left is tears and excuses apparently.
-
He lost. I'm over it. But the facts show the outcome would likely have been different without the suppression of the Hunter laptop story.
What about the Hillary Email release right before the election. Do you feel the same? Do you think that might have impacted the results?
-
So that means you reviewed the Pennsylvania case where the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits and granted an injunction, only to be overruled by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a technical basis (i.e., not on the merits)? What is your take on that case?
It does not mean I reviewed that specific case. It's June 2023, the appeals have run their course. I'm satisfied as are most Americans that the election results were accurate. Or better yet, while some fraud was involved from both sides, nothing indicated it would have changed the election.
-
What about the Hillary Email release right before the election. Do you feel the same? Do you think that might have impacted the results?
Of course, just goes to show you even the democrat controlled media didn't want that old bag in office.
-
No it wouldn't. Just like the cheating affair suppression would not have swayed enough people to vote against Trumpy.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda,..... but it didn't. All that is left is tears and excuses apparently.
That was a good point
-
Of course, just goes to show you even the democrat controlled media didn't want that old bag in office.
Who knows.. but the ability to forget for some is pretty amazing when it comes to politics
-
Yep
nope
-
Who knows.. but the ability to forget for some is pretty amazing when it comes to politics
We see that daily with liberals and weak ass repubs.
-
We see that daily with liberals and weak ass repubs.
No, not getting away with the weak ass repubs... Hell on this thread you see strong ass repubs forgetting
-
No, not getting away with the weak ass repubs... Hell on this thread you see strong ass repubs forgetting
You mistake my use of the word weak. If the repubs were worth a shit they would pursue charges for all the things they claim to have proof of. Tired of the talking, I want to see action.
-
No it wouldn't. Just like the cheating affair suppression would not have swayed enough people to vote against Trumpy.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda,..... but it didn't. All that is left is tears and excuses apparently.
Cooper: One in six Biden voters would have changed their minds if they had known the full story
November 26, 2020
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2020/nov/26/cooper-biden-voters/
79% say ‘truthful’ coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop would have changed 2020 election
By Bruce Golding
August 26, 2022
https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/2020-election-outcome-would-differ-with-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-poll/
-
You mistake my use of the word weak. If the repubs were worth a shit they would pursue charges for all the things they claim to have proof of. Tired of the talking, I want to see action.
Ok.. agree with that
-
It does not mean I reviewed that specific case. It's June 2023, the appeals have run their course. I'm satisfied as are most Americans that the election results were accurate. Or better yet, while some fraud was involved from both sides, nothing indicated it would have changed the election.
Trumpturds love to whine about election fraud and interference. ::)
But only crickets when you talk about the actual fraud and interference attempts.
The bogus lawsuits
The infantile President and his lies
The fraudits
The recounts
The attempt bribery/threats to state officials to "find votes"
The fake electors
Why is the REAL fraud and interference attempts ignored by the mental minions? Hypocrites. :D
-
We see that daily with liberals and weak ass repubs.
We see that hourly with Trumpturds and idiots.
-
Cooper: One in six Biden voters would have changed their minds if they had known the full story
November 26, 2020
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2020/nov/26/cooper-biden-voters/
79% say ‘truthful’ coverage of Hunter Biden’s laptop would have changed 2020 election
By Bruce Golding
August 26, 2022
https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/2020-election-outcome-would-differ-with-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-poll/
437 people asked do not represent an entire voting block shift. Where was the poll conducted? Who was polled? The only thing is that is was people that were "following the laptop story". ::) I am sure I can poll 437 people who were "following the porn star affairs" and find a higher number that would have not voted for Trumpy over this.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda..... but it didn't. All that is left is tears and excuses apparently. And opinion pieces.
-
437 people asked do not represent an entire voting block shift. Where was the poll conducted? Who was polled? The only thing is that is was people that were "following the laptop story". ::) I am sure I can poll 437 people who were "following the porn star affairs" and find a higher number that would have not voted for Trumpy over this.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda..... but it didn't. All that is left is tears and excuses apparently. And opinion pieces.
written like a child - Low IQ dumb bitch can't keep track of his grooming site's I guess...
-
That was a good point
There were polls that showed otherwise.
It didn't take a massive swing due to the EC.
-
What about the Hillary Email release right before the election. Do you feel the same? Do you think that might have impacted the results?
You mean the case where she unquestionably broke the law running classified intel off a private server, deleted over 30,000 emails with BleachBit that were under subpoena, and smashed cell phones with hammers? Yes I'm sure that impacted a number of voters.
But that obviously isn't the same as suppressing a legitimate story with a fake narrative.
-
It does not mean I reviewed that specific case. It's June 2023, the appeals have run their course. I'm satisfied as are most Americans that the election results were accurate. Or better yet, while some fraud was involved from both sides, nothing indicated it would have changed the election.
I see. You "Followed the investigations, the lawsuits," except the one where the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
You mean the case where she unquestionably broke the law running classified intel off a private server, deleted over 30,000 emails with BleachBit that were under subpoena, and smashed cell phones with hammers? Yes I'm sure that impacted a number of voters.
But that obviously isn't the same as suppressing a legitimate story with a fake narrative.
Yes, I don't get that point.
One was influencing by telling the truth.
The other was influencing by hiding it.
Completely opposite behavior, the former being proper, the latter being criminal.
-
You mean the case where she unquestionably broke the law running classified intel off a private server, deleted over 30,000 emails with BleachBit that were under subpoena, and smashed cell phones with hammers? Yes I'm sure that impacted a number of voters.
But that obviously isn't the same as suppressing a legitimate story with a fake narrative.
How was she never arrested - surely those are serious crimes ? or they not.
-
Yes, I don't get that point.
One was influencing by telling the truth.
The other was influencing by hiding it.
Completely opposite behavior, the former being proper, the latter being criminal.
Correct. Definitely a moral equivalency fail by Agnostic.
-
How was she never arrested - surely those are serious crimes ? or they not.
They literally put people in jail for doing a fraction of what she did. Did you know she had her staff strip classified markings off documents and/or retyped them so she could send on her private server?
She was also emailing Obama from her private server, so he knew. Bunch of corrupt mofos.
-
What about the Hillary Email release right before the election. Do you feel the same? Do you think that might have impacted the results?
Solid statement. I was going to ask the same question.
-
They literally put people in jail for doing a fraction of what she did. Did you know she had her staff strip classified markings off documents and/or retyped them so she could send on her private server?
She was also emailing Obama from her private server, so he knew. Bunch of corrupt mofos.
Corruption is off the charts never have seen anything like it in America. Banana Republic!
-
Solid statement. I was going to ask the same question.
It was answered a couple posts above.
-
And no one is surprised a right winger said something false and got called on it.
Ae you that retarded, thinking only Pubtards lie?? All humans lie, all politicians lie, in fact, Biden cant stop...
One-sided retard cant see reality...
-
They literally put people in jail for doing a fraction of what she did. Did you know she had her staff strip classified markings off documents and/or retyped them so she could send on her private server?
She was also emailing Obama from her private server, so he knew. Bunch of corrupt mofos.
Thats what I thought - yet she got away with it no problem - How ?
Perhaps our Ex detective LEO Agnostic can join in & offer an explanation also
-
Thats what I thought - yet she got away with it no problem - How ?
Perhaps our Ex detective LEO Agnostic can join in & offer an explanation also
First, I would have to spend some time verifying Dos' spin on what happened. Often times when that happens, we find it wasn't exactly as he makes it sound. But the thing is,
1. Those allegations are from some time back.
2. As you raised yourself, IF all that happened as he says, and Republicans didn't just come into existence in the last 3 years, what were the results of the investigations that must have transpired as those are all serious allegations.
3. That Dos is convinced Trump is immune to charges because of a President Act that the majority of experts say isn't true, Dos' credibility on those type of things isn't all that great.
4. I would have to care enough to spend the effort. I'm leaving tomorrow to Colombia for a couple weeks (never been) so I don't think it will be at the top of my list.
-
It was answered a couple posts above.
I stopped reading immediately on page 3 after reading it, quoted it and then came back to see where it landed. Maybe reading the thread all the way through would help, but then I’d be less likely to go back and quote it to show my agreement with his post. I’ll try and do better moving forward.
-
First, I would have to spend some time verifying Dos' spin on what happened. Often times when that happens, we find it wasn't exactly as he makes it sound. But the thing is,
1. Those allegations are from some time back.
2. As you raised yourself, IF all that happened as he says, and Republicans didn't just come into existence in the last 3 years, what were the results of the investigations that must have transpired as those are all serious allegations.
3. That Dos is convinced Trump is immune to charges because of a President Act that the majority of experts say isn't true, Dos' credibility on those type of things isn't all that great.
4. I would have to care enough to spend the effort. I'm leaving tomorrow to Colombia for a couple weeks (never been) so I don't think it will be at the top of my list.
Do you not know anything about what she did & didn't do ?
I did hear something about emails on her computer & smashing phones !!
Was it all made up or any truth to it.
Fair enough - enjoy your trip.
-
So that means you reviewed the Pennsylvania case where the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits and granted an injunction, only to be overruled by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a technical basis (i.e., not on the merits)? What is your take on that case?
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/11/fact-check-judge-did-not-give-pennsylvania-legislators-power-to-choose-electors.html
you're point?
"The decision noted that the plaintiffs only challenged the law a year after it was passed and only after the election didn't go their way. The justices ruled they violated the "doctrine of laches" by not filing their peition in "a timely manner":
The want of due diligence demonstrated in this matter is unmistakable. Petitioners filed this facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory provisions more than one year after the enactment of Act 77. At the time this action was filed on November 21, 2020, millions of Pennsylvania voters had already expressed their will in both the June 2020 Primary Election and the November 2020 General Election and the final ballots in the 2020 General Election were being tallied, with the results becoming seemingly apparent. Nevertheless, Petitioners waited to commence this litigation until days before the county boards of election were required to certify the election results to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Thus, it is beyond cavil that Petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim. Equally clear is the substantial prejudice arising from Petitioners' failure to institute promptly a facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory scheme, as such inaction would result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters."
Something told me if I looked into your allegation I would find something like this.,..
-
You lying sonofabeech, Agnostic!
:D
-
Thats what I thought - yet she got away with it no problem - How ?
Perhaps our Ex detective LEO Agnostic can join in & offer an explanation also
Because he rewrote the statute to remove "gross negligence" and replace it with actual intent, then said no reasonable prosecutor would pursue this. Absolute garbage.
-
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/11/fact-check-judge-did-not-give-pennsylvania-legislators-power-to-choose-electors.html
you're point?
"The decision noted that the plaintiffs only challenged the law a year after it was passed and only after the election didn't go their way. The justices ruled they violated the "doctrine of laches" by not filing their peition in "a timely manner":
The want of due diligence demonstrated in this matter is unmistakable. Petitioners filed this facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory provisions more than one year after the enactment of Act 77. At the time this action was filed on November 21, 2020, millions of Pennsylvania voters had already expressed their will in both the June 2020 Primary Election and the November 2020 General Election and the final ballots in the 2020 General Election were being tallied, with the results becoming seemingly apparent. Nevertheless, Petitioners waited to commence this litigation until days before the county boards of election were required to certify the election results to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Thus, it is beyond cavil that Petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim. Equally clear is the substantial prejudice arising from Petitioners' failure to institute promptly a facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory scheme, as such inaction would result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters."
Something told me if I looked into your allegation I would find something like this.,..
I said the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits and the appellate court reversed on a technical basis, i.e., not on the merits. So you go find a blurb that confirms exactly what I said. lol *Channeling Forrest Gump* Are you stupid or something?
-
You lying sonofabeech, Agnostic!
:D
Certainly appears to be.
-
I said the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits and the appellate court reversed on a technical basis, i.e., not on the merits. So you go find a blurb that confirms exactly what I said. lol *Channeling Forrest Gump* Are you stupid or something?
No, the judge made a bad decision and that's exactly what higher courts are for... If you don't like the system that is one thing but this does NOT equate to any proof of voter fraud. Nice try
-
You lying sonofabeech, Agnostic!
:D
:)
-
We see that hourly with Trumpturds and idiots.
I thought about going through your first page of post history to see how many times per day you mention Trump but then I realized I'm not nearly as interested in that as you are what the headlines told you Trump did, Tom.
-
Certainly appears to be.
\
"But data for some of the largest counties were reported in lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign after the 2020 election challenging the validity of certain ballots. They included 8,329 ballots in Philadelphia County, some of which were undated; 2,349 undated ballots in Allegheny County and 1,196 undated or partially dated ballots in Bucks County.
Marc Meredith, an associate professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, told the AP that it is highly unlikely Trump’s margin in Pennsylvania could have been negated by undated or incorrectly dated ballots, as they are now defined, based on the overall number of absentee or mail-in ballots cast in these counties.
“Given that almost 1/3 of the mail ballots counted in the 2020 presidential race in Pennsylvania were cast in these three counties, there is no way Trump would have netted anywhere close to 80,000 votes had these ballots not been counted,” he wrote in an email.
___
This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP."
-
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/11/fact-check-judge-did-not-give-pennsylvania-legislators-power-to-choose-electors.html
you're point?
"The decision noted that the plaintiffs only challenged the law a year after it was passed and only after the election didn't go their way. The justices ruled they violated the "doctrine of laches" by not filing their peition in "a timely manner":
The want of due diligence demonstrated in this matter is unmistakable. Petitioners filed this facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory provisions more than one year after the enactment of Act 77. At the time this action was filed on November 21, 2020, millions of Pennsylvania voters had already expressed their will in both the June 2020 Primary Election and the November 2020 General Election and the final ballots in the 2020 General Election were being tallied, with the results becoming seemingly apparent. Nevertheless, Petitioners waited to commence this litigation until days before the county boards of election were required to certify the election results to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Thus, it is beyond cavil that Petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim. Equally clear is the substantial prejudice arising from Petitioners' failure to institute promptly a facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory scheme, as such inaction would result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters."
Something told me if I looked into your allegation I would find something like this.,..
Jesus Christ, Agnostic. “Lead stories”? No wonder why you’re completely out of the loop. Even Zuckerberg said that third party “fact checks” is opinion. “Lead stories” is one of Facebook’s so called “fact checks”
-
I said the judge found a likelihood of success on the merits and the appellate court reversed on a technical basis, i.e., not on the merits. So you go find a blurb that confirms exactly what I said. lol *Channeling Forrest Gump* Are you stupid or something?
Anything else you want me to look into? Didn't think so... ;)
-
Jesus Christ, Agnostic. “Lead stories”? No wonder why you’re completely out of the loop. Even Zuckerberg said that third party “fact checks” is opinion. “Lead stories” is one of Facebook’s so called “fact checks”
So, no apology on calling me a liar Coach? That how you roll?
-
No, the judge made a bad decision and that's exactly what higher courts are for... If you don't like the system that is one thing but this does NOT equate to any proof of voter fraud. Nice try
No, the "higher court" did not rule on the merits. Which is exactly what I said. I don't care if you agree with the decisions, but the fact is a judge found a likelihood of success on the merits. So saying you reviewed the cases and they were all frivolous is a lie. But lying is apparently what you do.
-
No, the "higher court" did not rule on the merits. Which is exactly what I said. I don't care if you agree with the decisions, but the fact is a judge found a likelihood of success on the merits. So saying you reviewed the cases and they were all frivolous is a lie. But lying is apparently what you do.
You are misleading... but that is what you do..
-
Anything else you want me to look into? Didn't think so... ;)
I'm starting to think you have some kind of mental handicap.
-
I'm starting to think you have some kind of mental handicap.
Cool.. tell you what. Post a link stating the Judge said the case had merit and what the merits were
-
So, no apology on calling me a liar Coach? That how you roll?
You haven’t proved it and I still think you’re politically inept but I will apologize only because Chaos told me. For the record, I have none of your personal information. I just personally know Chaos and know he wouldn’t lie.
Just do better when researching evidence
-
I'm starting to think you have some kind of mental handicap.
It's taken you a long time, you're far too forgiving. :)
-
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/ballot-curing-in-pennsylvania/
Bottom line, no matter how you cut it, it's pretty clear, nothing would have changed in the outcome. Biden won, Trump lost. Which your initial post was an attempt to throw a "but maybe...." into the pot.. sorry. The election wasn't stolen. Biden one. End of story.
-
Cool.. tell you what. Post a link stating the Judge said the case had merit and what the merits were
Here is a link that took about ten seconds to find. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/12/pennsylvania-judge-rules-in-favor-of-trump-campaign-orders-state-cant-count-some-ballots/?sh=14bf678c6c12
In terms of the analysis, do it yourself.
-
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/ballot-curing-in-pennsylvania/
Bottom line, no matter how you cut it, it's pretty clear, nothing would have changed in the outcome. Biden won, Trump lost. Which your initial post was an attempt to throw a "but maybe...." into the pot.. sorry. The election wasn't stolen. Biden one. End of story.
Bruh. Seriously? The only point was that not every judge said the claims were frivolous.
Yes Biden won. Yes there was some amount of rigging of the election, particularly regarding the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. But you're too big of a partisan tool to care that "51 former intelligence officials" outright lied to you, and that big tech conspired to suppress the story. Any freedom loving American should be concerned about that. Biden nut huggers with Trump Derangement Syndrome, not so much.
-
It's taken you a long time, you're far too forgiving. :)
Yeah I try and give everyone the benefit of the doubt. :-\
-
Bruh. Seriously? The only point was that not every judge said the claims were frivolous.
Yes Biden won. Yes there was some amount of rigging of the election, particularly regarding the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. But you're too big of a partisan tool to care that "51 former intelligence officials" outright lied to you, and that big tech conspired to suppress the story. Any freedom loving American should be concerned about that. Biden nut huggers with Trump Derangement Syndrome, not so much.
You are so disingenuous. You posted the original "did you know about the Pennsylvania judge that ...... " as if it was some evidence that the election was stolen. It turns out to be a big nothing burger as usual. The judge was focused on a new act passed. But since no one bothered to complain in the prior elections and until their candidate lost (Republicans) that judge was overruled and rightly so. BUT... and here is the kicker you are wanting everyone else to not see. EVEN IF THE judges injunction held, it wouldn't have changed the outcome. Hence, my position, the election was not stolen is still correct. You're smoke screen meant nothing. That you are having trouble comprehending that is hilarious
-
It's taken you a long time, you're far too forgiving. :)
Thanks for your valued contribution to the discussion. That post may go down in Gebig history..
-
I thought about going through your first page of post history to see how many times per day you mention Trump but then I realized I'm not nearly as interested in that as you are what the headlines told you Trump did, Tom.
Not nearly as many times as you defend and deflect for him Fetter.
-
You are so disingenuous. You posted the original "did you know about the Pennsylvania judge that ...... " as if it was some evidence that the election was stolen. It turns out to be a big nothing burger as usual. The judge was focused on a new act passed. But since no one bothered to complain in the prior elections and until their candidate lost (Republicans) that judge was overruled and rightly so. BUT... and here is the kicker you are wanting everyone else to not see. EVEN IF THE judges injunction held, it wouldn't have changed the outcome. Hence, my position, the election was not stolen is still correct. You're smoke screen meant nothing. That you are having trouble comprehending that is hilarious
Listen you lying terd, I did not say the election was stolen. I have never said the election was stolen. I have always said Biden won. I've always said some improper things happened that helped him win.
You have a reading comprehension problem. And an integrity problem. (Bad combination.) Go back and read what I said, without inserting your asinine implications. The only thing I said was that not every judge determined all claims were frivolous. And that the judge was overturned, not based on the merits. You then went and found some blurb that confirmed exactly what I said. Holy smokes you are a simpleton. lol ;D
-
All the little Trumpturds like to talk about election fraud and rigged elections, but never say a peep about the true fraud and rigging attempts.
Why is that?
-
It's taken you a long time, you're far too forgiving. :)
I'm guessing when you watch Star Wars you are cheering for the Empire
-
Listen you lying terd, I did not say the election was stolen. I have never said the election was stolen. I have always said Biden won. I've always said some improper things happened that helped him win.
You have a reading comprehension problem. And an integrity problem. (Bad combination.) Go back and read what I said, without inserting your asinine implications. The only thing I said was that not every judge determined all claims were frivolous. And that the judge was overturned, not based on the merits. You then went and found some blurb that confirmed exactly what I said. Holy smokes you are a simpleton. lol ;D
Blah blah blah.. Trump... blah blah blah
-
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/ballot-curing-in-pennsylvania/
Bottom line, no matter how you cut it, it's pretty clear, nothing would have changed in the outcome. Biden won, Trump lost. Which your initial post was an attempt to throw a "but maybe...." into the pot.. sorry. The election wasn't stolen. Biden one. End of story.
If you used “fact-check.org” in a court of law, it’s credibly would be immediately challenged then thrown out of court. Try again
-
If you used “fact-check.org” in a court of law, it’s credibly would be immediately challenged then thrown out of court. Try again
Dude, you have lost any right to post about sources with your Gateway Pundit crap.. your lack of self-awareness is legendary..
-
I'm guessing when you watch Star Wars you are cheering for the Empire
What is The Empire's stance on freedom of speech? 8)
-
Dude, you have lost any right to post about sources with your Gateway Pundit crap.. your lack of self-awareness is legendary..
Sometimes a person is too stupid to realize that they are stupid. This is the person(s) you are arguing with.
The disconnection from reality is real.
-
Dude, you have lost any right to post about sources with your Gateway Pundit crap.. your lack of self-awareness is legendary..
You don’t read it so you wouldn’t know. So once again, you refuse to do your homework
-
The disconnection from reality is real.
You said Biden was mentally fine, right? The Emperor has no brain.
-
You said Biden was mentally fine, right? The Emperor has no brain.
God Save The Queen - to That. ;D
-
You said Biden was mentally fine, right? The Emperor has no brain.
Yep.
He can walk and talk just fine. Like everyone doesn’t trip. ::)
-
God Save The Queen - to That. ;D
He said "God save the Queen man." Dementia.
-
You mistake my use of the word weak. If the repubs were worth a shit they would pursue charges for all the things they claim to have proof of. Tired of the talking, I want to see action.
The key phrase in your post is "claim to have proof." So far claiming is all they have. Clearly they don't have proof of shit or they would certainly 'bring it'.
-
You said Biden was mentally fine, right? The Emperor has no brain.
Better capacity than the lying whining orange turd and his supporters. <-- that would be you.
-
Funny how this thread turned from Qoach lying (again) into a Biden whinefest.
But then again, there really was no other course of discussion unless more excuses or lies were crapped out. Which they were.
-
Funny how this thread turned from Qoach lying (again) into a Biden whinefest.
But then again, there really was no other course of discussion unless more excuses or lies were crapped out. Which they were.
coming from a friendless self loathing loser in life ::)
-
Better capacity than the lying whining orange turd and his supporters. <-- that would be you.
No, just no.
Can't take much seriously from somebody who turns a blind eye to the corrupt, falling, gaffe master.
Everybody knows he runs nothing. How could he?
-
No, just no.
Can't take much seriously from somebody who turns a blind eye to the corrupt, falling, gaffe master.
Everybody knows he runs nothing. How could he?
Apparently he is doing better than the lying, whining, indictment collecting infantile cheeto that was there the last four years. I have yet to see any of Biden's administration come out and say how incompetent or clueless he was/is. Unlike like Trumpy's.
No one takes Trumpy supporters seriously anyway.
-
Dam, you are psychic.
I was thinking about her...
(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/22/08/442208137c715383876b1eb53ca519e8.jpg)
Looks suspect.
Is she hiding a sausage underneath that dress?
If so, I'm in.
No homo
-
No, just no.
Can't take much seriously from somebody who turns a blind eye to the corrupt, falling, gaffe master.
Everybody knows he runs nothing. How could he?
Biden couldnt run a lemonade stand without raping kid-customers... Very retarded, corrupt and perverted individual...
Pant-Shitter of the US (POTUS)...
-
Thanks for your valued contribution to the discussion. That post may go down in Gebig history..
You can't have a discussion when party liners like yourself are stuck in the media frenzy instead of common sense and logic. Step back and look at the facts yourself, Detective.
-
You can't have a discussion when party liners like yourself are stuck in the media frenzy instead of common sense and logic. Step back and look at the facts yourself, Detective.
He isn't clueless, he's without honor which is why I coined the term "Law Enfarcement".