You are so disingenuous. You posted the original "did you know about the Pennsylvania judge that ...... " as if it was some evidence that the election was stolen. It turns out to be a big nothing burger as usual. The judge was focused on a new act passed. But since no one bothered to complain in the prior elections and until their candidate lost (Republicans) that judge was overruled and rightly so. BUT... and here is the kicker you are wanting everyone else to not see. EVEN IF THE judges injunction held, it wouldn't have changed the outcome. Hence, my position, the election was not stolen is still correct. You're smoke screen meant nothing. That you are having trouble comprehending that is hilarious
Listen you lying terd, I did not say the election was stolen. I have never said the election was stolen. I have always said Biden won. I've always said some improper things happened that helped him win.
You have a reading comprehension problem. And an integrity problem. (Bad combination.) Go back and read what I said, without inserting your asinine implications. The only thing I said was that not every judge determined all claims were frivolous. And that the judge was overturned, not based on the merits. You then went and found some blurb that confirmed exactly what I said. Holy smokes you are a simpleton. lol
