Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on July 04, 2023, 07:12:16 PM
-
Look at this news article from The Daily Caller: New Photos Reportedly Show Hunter Biden Speeding At 172 MPH, Smoking Crack While Driving
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/07/03/new-photos-show-hunter-biden-speeding-at-172-mph-smoking-crack-while-driving-1373978/
-
Look at this news article from The Daily Caller: New Photos Reportedly Show Hunter Biden Speeding At 172 MPH, Smoking Crack While Driving
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/07/03/new-photos-show-hunter-biden-speeding-at-172-mph-smoking-crack-while-driving-1373978/
Yup... a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere.
-
Look at this news article from The Daily Caller: New Photos Reportedly Show Hunter Biden Speeding At 172 MPH, Smoking Crack While Driving
https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/07/03/new-photos-show-hunter-biden-speeding-at-172-mph-smoking-crack-while-driving-1373978/
Fucking Hunter Biden. They should impeach him.
-
Hunter is a very skilled driver.
Takes after his Dad.
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--OYGrDTKg--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/om0yhcvbuganvgtjpfmh.gif)
-
Yup... a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere.
Hunter Biden needs to be in the picture until all questions are answered.
If the media, big tech, and various gov't agencies did their actual job, all this WOULD be in the past already.
-
This will surely lead to Biden's impeachment now. hahahahahaha :D
-
Hunters not the sharpest tool in the shed. (Filming that).
Though Joe says he's the smartest guy he knows.
Shows how braindead poor ole Joe (the Ashley Raper) is...
Probably the most embarrassing family in the USA. (Sniff and rape kids, hardcore drugs, illegal and corrupt deals, Ole Cornpop, daily major gaffe's).
;D ;D ;D ;D
Hilarious stuff...
-
Imagine how many millions NASCAR must have donated to his LLCs after seeing such skill at driving at those speeds.
Good thing he is focusing on his art instead. Bunch of rednecks would be more upset than usual if he started winning those races.
-
It's almost like he knows he can do anything and not get in trouble. ::)
-
This will surely lead to Biden's impeachment now. hahahahahaha :D
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/529/all-actions?overview=closed&q=%7B%22roll-call-vote%22%3A%22all%22%7D
-
Rednecks > Blue-haired kid-raping demturdz...
-
Rednecks > Blue-haired kid-raping demturdz...
And yet no one has posted evidence yet of the kid-raping. Wonder why?
-
And yet no one has posted evidence yet of the kid-raping. Wonder why?
Because you’re too stupid to figure it out?
-
Because you’re too stupid to figure it out?
No, because there is no evidence.
But humor us all with what you have "figured out".
-
No, because there is no evidence.
But humor us all with what you have "figured out".
Tons of evidence. You’re too lazy and stupid to look for it
-
Yup... a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere.
Try saying that in if you're ever in court over a past issue, See how it works out ;D
-
Tons of evidence. You’re too lazy and stupid to look for it
I don't look over bullshit.
And you don't know the difference between that and "evidence". So tell what your little fractured brain has "figured out".
-
I don't look over bullshit.
And you don't know the difference between that and "evidence". So tell what your little fractured brain has "figured out".
Then shut the fuck up. It’s that simple. There’s no evidence in the past 7+ years he’s done what he’s accused of yet you run with it.
-
Try saying that in if you're ever in court over a past issue, See how it works out ;D
Sorry, cannot wrap my head around this. I assume since you used court and issue in the same sentence, you mean accused of some illegal activity. I don't now nor have I ever engaged in illegal activities. So what kind of past issue are you talking about?
-
Then shut the fuck up. It’s that simple. There’s no evidence in the past 7+ years he’s done what he’s accused of yet you run with it.
So again, you don't know the difference between bullshit and evidence. Nothing new to us on here about that.
-
It's almost like he knows he can do anything and not get in trouble. ::)
Truth.
-
Sorry, cannot wrap my head around this. I assume since you used court and issue in the same sentence, you mean accused of some illegal activity. I don't now nor have I ever engaged in illegal activities. So what kind of past issue are you talking about?
I did say IF - and not anything specific.
-
I did say IF - and not anything specific.
Yes, you did. Well don't hold your breath, the chances of my having to go to court are almost nil.
Because I am 'as old as dirt', I do not have to serve on jury duty, although I enjoyed the times that I did. Quite a while back, I was called to serve as a juror on an appeal trial for Oregon serial killer Dayton LeRoy Rogers, (he has brought forth several appeals over the last three plus decades). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton_Leroy_Rogers Unfortunately, they only wanted jurors who had no prior knowledge about his case or the trials. Anyone who lived in Oregon for a couple of decades knows about this case. Not sure how they thought they would find 12 jurors plus alternates that did not.
-
Yes, you did. Well don't hold your breath, the chances of my having to go to court are almost nil.
Because I am 'as old as dirt', I do not have to serve on jury duty, although I enjoyed the times that I did. Quite a while back, I was called to serve as a juror on an appeal trial for Oregon serial killer Dayton LeRoy Rogers, (he has brought forth several appeals over the last three plus decades). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayton_Leroy_Rogers Unfortunately, they only wanted jurors who had no prior knowledge about his case or the trials. Anyone who lived in Oregon for a couple of decades knows about this case. Not sure how they thought they would find 12 jurors plus alternates that did not.
I won't be waiting ;D
How do you think saying ....... "a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere" would it be a wise decision or not as many folk go to court years after crimes
were committed.
-
I won't be waiting ;D
How do you think saying ....... "a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere" would it be a wise decision or not as many folk go to court years after crimes
were committed.
Perhaps for other crimes some folks do end up in court. My guess these are mostly crimes such as murder, rape, and perhaps tax fraud. I seriously doubt a 5 years old, self-incriminating photo of a traffic crime which included speeding and a DUII that he later wrote about in his 2021 memoir 'Beautiful Things'.
But hey, if you and the Daily Caller enjoy being mired in the past... who am I to argue about it. But I still believe suggesting someone not live in the past is good advice. People who cannot let go of negative thoughts and experiences end up with way too much emotional baggage.
-
Perhaps for other crimes some folks do end up in court. My guess these are mostly crimes such as murder, rape, and perhaps tax fraud. I seriously doubt a 5 years old, self-incriminating photo of a traffic crime which included speeding and a DUII that he later wrote about in his 2021 memoir 'Beautiful Things'.
But hey, if you and the Daily Caller enjoy being mired in the past... who am I to argue about it. But I still believe suggesting someone not live in the past is good advice. People who cannot let go of negative thoughts and experiences end up with way too much emotional baggage.
Nicely written & avoiding answering a simple question .
And why shouldn't he be taken to court IF he's admitting what he did
& there's photographic evidence?
-
Why shouldn't fake US citizens be taken to court IF they are bragging about killing "many" people?
Or is getting laughed at by internet strangers for being a lying little bitch punishment enough?
-
Nicely written & avoiding answering a simple question .
And why shouldn't he be taken to court IF he's admitting what he did
& there's photographic evidence?
Thanks for the compliment. Just because you don't like my answer does not mean I avoided doing so. Plus, that question makes no sense because neither Hunter nor anyone else would be tried for those 'crimes' 5 years later.
Maybe ethically he should be taken to court but that would never happen for several reasons.
One reason for this is that neither offence would be taken to court because the courts have more important matters to try, and this would likely have been a misdemeanor - not even a felony.
And, according to Amco Auto Insurance: In legal terms, the statute of limitations for moving violations is typically going to be two years, depending on the nature and severity of the violation. This means that once those two years are up, there's not much that the courts can do to you. 2018 was 5 years ago.
As for the photo he took of himself supposedly smoking a crack pipe while in Arlington Virginia. To prove he was driving under the influence he would have had to have been given a urine test within a maximum of 3 days of the incidence to find cocaine remaining in his system and likely in a much shorter time. Just because you'd like to see his ass fried, doesn't mean it could happen. LOL!
-
Thanks for the compliment. Just because you don't like my answer does not mean I avoided doing so. Plus, that question makes no sense because neither Hunter nor anyone else would be tried for those 'crimes' 5 years later.
Maybe ethically he should be taken to court but that would never happen for several reasons.
One reason for this is that neither offence would be taken to court because the courts have more important matters to try, and this would likely have been a misdemeanor - not even a felony.
And, according to Amco Auto Insurance: In legal terms, the statute of limitations for moving violations is typically going to be two years, depending on the nature and severity of the violation. This means that once those two years are up, there's not much that the courts can do to you. 2018 was 5 years ago.
As for the photo he took of himself supposedly smoking a crack pipe while in Arlington Virginia. To prove he was driving under the influence he would have had to have been given a urine test within a maximum of 3 days of the incidence to find cocaine remaining in his system and likely in a much shorter time. Just because you'd like to see his ass fried, doesn't mean it could happen. LOL!
So you think going 172 mph on a public highway is a simple “moving violation”? It’s a felony, as in “Felony Reckless Endangerment” oh boy, lol
-
So you think going 172 mph on a public highway is a simple “moving violation”? It’s a felony, as in “Felony Reckless Endangerment” oh boy, lol
Hey Coach, you've got mail brother.
-
So you think going 172 mph on a public highway is a simple “moving violation”? It’s a felony, as in “Felony Reckless Endangerment” oh boy, lol
Oh boy Coach, it behooves you to do a little research before posting replies and laughing at people's posts. Not that I am offended, because I am not. But feel free to prove me wrong on this matter.
Really? Remember this incident took place in Nevada. Traffic laws vary by state. I've not read were Hunter killed or injured anyone while speeding at 170 mph. Do you know otherwise?
Nevada law:
If no physical injury or death resulted from the reckless driving, it is considered a misdemeanor. If physical injury or death was caused by the driving, it is considered a felony. Reckless driving may also be offered as an alternative to a DUI charge.
https://thedefenders.net/las-vegas/when-can-i-be-charged-with-reckless-driving-in-nevada/#:~:text=If%20no%20physical%20injury%20or,alternative%20to%20a%20DUI%20charge.
-
So you think going 172 mph on a public highway is a simple “moving violation”? It’s a felony, as in “Felony Reckless Endangerment” oh boy, lol
Actually it is neither unless you are caught. :D He received neither a moving violation or a felony.
172mph is actually quite slow compared to how fast you wake up thinking about him everyday.
-
Yup... a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere.
Says the guy obsessed with stories about a former President in an attempt to deflect from the abortion of an administration we are currently dealing with. ::)
-
Oh boy Coach, it behooves you to do a little research before posting replies and laughing at people's posts. Not that I am offended, because I am not. But feel free to prove me wrong on this matter.
Really? Remember this incident took place in Nevada. Traffic laws vary by state. I've not read were Hunter killed or injured anyone while speeding at 170 mph. Do you know otherwise?
Nevada law:
If no physical injury or death resulted from the reckless driving, it is considered a misdemeanor. If physical injury or death was caused by the driving, it is considered a felony. Reckless driving may also be offered as an alternative to a DUI charge.
https://thedefenders.net/las-vegas/when-can-i-be-charged-with-reckless-driving-in-nevada/#:~:text=If%20no%20physical%20injury%20or,alternative%20to%20a%20DUI%20charge.
Not sure why you posted Nevada when it happened in VA. Proving you in Lurker wrong is like an involuntary reflex. It just happens.
https://www.fightvirginiarecklessdriving.com/is-reckless-driving-a-felony-in-va/
-
Just to be clear, I think Hunter Biden has been a thorn in his father's side for many years...’the prodigal son’, as it were. One hopes Hunter is ashamed of his past behavior, but there is no way for anyone but those closest to him to know this.
I am writing this because it may seem like I approve or am defending Hunter Biden and his past screw-ups. I am not. I have no reason to do that. But, as we know regardless of where we stand on the political spectrum, the media often blows this ‘shit’ out of proportion and lies about it as much as they can possibly get away with.
In the leaked photos from 2018, Hunter, now aged 53, he could be seen holding a crack pipe, then lighting and smoking it as he drove through a road full of houses, which was later recognized as Arlington, Virginia.
Another photo showed Hunter traveling to Vegas, driving a Porsche at high-speed. The report said messages on the discarded laptop suggests there was a hot tub party with multiple women waiting for him.' Yippee!
https://www.wionews.com/world/leaked-photos-hunter-biden-smokes-crack-while-driving-at-high-speed-says-report-611695
This says these are two separate incidents, not that we don’t know whether he was also speeding in Arlington, VA or smoking his crack pipe in Nevada. It would not surprise me at all if he was doing both things at both times. But if he was, it should have been better explained by the media. Arlington, VA is 2500 miles and 36 hours (at the speed limit) away from Las Vegas, NV. He sure was not in the same place at both times.
I almost always obey the speed limit no matter whether I am driving on the Freeway or on city streets. There is no place in Oregon where the speed limit comes close to 170 mph. So understandably, driving at 170 mph seems outrageous and 'reckless' to me.
However, I have also driven on the Autobahn in Germany at what seemed like a reasonable keep up with the flow speed and had Mercedes and BMWs come flying up behind me seemingly out of nowhere, flashing their lights and honking their horns as in telling me to get out of their ‘fucking’ way... which I did as quickly as possible.
Did you know that more than half of the total length of the German autobahn network has no speed limit, about one third has a permanent limit, and the remaining parts have a temporary or conditional limit. Some cars with very powerful engines can reach speeds of well over 300 km/h (190 mph). This is crazy and very disarming for an 'old man' driver from the U.S. who is trying to figure out how fast he is going while attempting to convert km/h to mph. LOL!
Articles I've read say Hunter was driving his Porsche. I do not know the model he was driving. I read it costs $130,000. Did you know a Porsche 911 GTS has a top speed of 193 mph. and a Porsche 919 Evo Hybrid has a top speed of 230 mph. What??? Where do people drive these 'rocket speed' cars in the U.S.? Anyway, this adds a different perspective to someone driving 170 mph. Either way an accident at those speeds usually means someone or everyone involved in it will die.
-
Just to be clear, I think Hunter Biden has been a thorn in his father's side for many years...’the prodigal son’, as it were. One hopes Hunter is ashamed of his past behavior, but there is no way for anyone but those closest to him to know this.
I am writing this because it may seem like I approve or am defending Hunter Biden and his past screw-ups. I am not. I have no reason to do that. But, as we know regardless of where we stand on the political spectrum, the media often blows this ‘shit’ out of proportion and lies about it as much as they can possibly get away with.
In the leaked photos from 2018, Hunter, now aged 53, he could be seen holding a crack pipe, then lighting and smoking it as he drove through a road full of houses, which was later recognized as Arlington, Virginia.
Another photo showed Hunter traveling to Vegas, driving a Porsche at high-speed. The report said messages on the discarded laptop suggests there was a hot tub party with multiple women waiting for him.' Yippee!
https://www.wionews.com/world/leaked-photos-hunter-biden-smokes-crack-while-driving-at-high-speed-says-report-611695
This says these are two separate incidents, not that we don’t know whether he was also speeding in Arlington, VA or smoking his crack pipe in Nevada. It would not surprise me at all if he was doing both things at both times. But if he was, it should have been better explained by the media. Arlington, VA is 2500 miles and 36 hours (at the speed limit) away from Las Vegas, NV. He sure was not in the same place at both times.
I almost always obey the speed limit no matter whether I am driving on the Freeway or on city streets. There is no place in Oregon where the speed limit comes close to 170 mph. So understandably, driving at 170 mph seems outrageous and 'reckless' to me.
However, I have also driven on the Autobahn in Germany at what seemed like a reasonable keep up with the flow speed and had Mercedes and BMWs come flying up behind me seemingly out of nowhere, flashing their lights and honking their horns as in telling me to get out of their ‘fucking’ way... which I did as quickly as possible.
Did you know that more than half of the total length of the German autobahn network has no speed limit, about one third has a permanent limit, and the remaining parts have a temporary or conditional limit. Some cars with very powerful engines can reach speeds of well over 300 km/h (190 mph). This is crazy and very disarming for an 'old man' driver from the U.S. who is trying to figure out how fast he is going while attempting to convert km/h to mph. LOL!
Articles I've read say Hunter was driving his Porsche. I do not know the model he was driving. I read it costs $130,000. Did you know a Porsche 911 GTS has a top speed of 193 mph. and a Porsche 919 Evo Hybrid has a top speed of 230 mph. What??? Where do people drive these 'rocket speed' cars in the U.S.? Anyway, this adds a different perspective to someone driving 170 mph. Either way an accident at those speeds usually means someone or everyone involved in it will die.
How do you feel about it being proven that Joe Biden lied in the first debate when he said the laptop was proven Russian disinformation when he knew it was real? How do you feel about those in his administration orchestrating to get the 51 folks to claim it had hallmarks of Russian disinformation when they knew it was real? How do you feel about the whistleblowers coming out saying the FBI has been stalwarting the investigation to cover for Biden and help him win the election?
These are not conspiracy theories. It actually happened.
-
How do you feel about it being proven that Joe Biden lied in the first debate when he said the laptop was proven Russian disinformation when he knew it was real? How do you feel about those in his administration orchestrating to get the 51 folks to claim it had hallmarks of Russian disinformation when they knew it was real? How do you feel about the whistleblowers coming out saying the FBI has been stalwarting the investigation to cover for Biden and help him win the election?
These are not conspiracy theories. It actually happened.
I feel that you believe this is how these things came down when they have been and continue to be contrary to what you claim. I feel you unfortunately wear blinders, at least when it comes to your political viewpoint.
-
I feel that you believe this is how these things came down when they have been and continue to be contrary to what you claim. I feel you unfortunately wear blinders, at least when it comes to your political viewpoint.
It’s not even a political viewpoint. These are stone cold facts. Holy shit
-
Just to be clear, I think Hunter Biden has been a thorn in his father's side for many years...’the prodigal son’, as it were. One hopes Hunter is ashamed of his past behavior, but there is no way for anyone but those closest to him to know this.
I am writing this because it may seem like I approve or am defending Hunter Biden and his past screw-ups. I am not. I have no reason to do that. But, as we know regardless of where we stand on the political spectrum, the media often blows this ‘shit’ out of proportion and lies about it as much as they can possibly get away with.
In the leaked photos from 2018, Hunter, now aged 53, he could be seen holding a crack pipe, then lighting and smoking it as he drove through a road full of houses, which was later recognized as Arlington, Virginia.
Another photo showed Hunter traveling to Vegas, driving a Porsche at high-speed. The report said messages on the discarded laptop suggests there was a hot tub party with multiple women waiting for him.' Yippee!
https://www.wionews.com/world/leaked-photos-hunter-biden-smokes-crack-while-driving-at-high-speed-says-report-611695
This says these are two separate incidents, not that we don’t know whether he was also speeding in Arlington, VA or smoking his crack pipe in Nevada. It would not surprise me at all if he was doing both things at both times. But if he was, it should have been better explained by the media. Arlington, VA is 2500 miles and 36 hours (at the speed limit) away from Las Vegas, NV. He sure was not in the same place at both times.
I almost always obey the speed limit no matter whether I am driving on the Freeway or on city streets. There is no place in Oregon where the speed limit comes close to 170 mph. So understandably, driving at 170 mph seems outrageous and 'reckless' to me.
However, I have also driven on the Autobahn in Germany at what seemed like a reasonable keep up with the flow speed and had Mercedes and BMWs come flying up behind me seemingly out of nowhere, flashing their lights and honking their horns as in telling me to get out of their ‘fucking’ way... which I did as quickly as possible.
Did you know that more than half of the total length of the German autobahn network has no speed limit, about one third has a permanent limit, and the remaining parts have a temporary or conditional limit. Some cars with very powerful engines can reach speeds of well over 300 km/h (190 mph). This is crazy and very disarming for an 'old man' driver from the U.S. who is trying to figure out how fast he is going while attempting to convert km/h to mph. LOL!
Articles I've read say Hunter was driving his Porsche. I do not know the model he was driving. I read it costs $130,000. Did you know a Porsche 911 GTS has a top speed of 193 mph. and a Porsche 919 Evo Hybrid has a top speed of 230 mph. What??? Where do people drive these 'rocket speed' cars in the U.S.? Anyway, this adds a different perspective to someone driving 170 mph. Either way an accident at those speeds usually means someone or everyone involved in it will die.
There is no putting lipstick on this pig. Driving 170 mph while smoking crack is deadly. That crackhead should be in jail.
-
I feel that you believe this is how these things came down when they have been and continue to be contrary to what you claim. I feel you unfortunately wear blinders, at least when it comes to your political viewpoint.
It’s not even a political viewpoint. These are stone cold facts. Holy shit
Coach is right. What Grape Ape cited are facts. But if you don't actually read or listen to news outside of the mainstream media, you may not know. Just pick a random day and evaluate the lead stories on CNN, Huffington Post, Fox News, and Newsmax. Wildly different coverage. If you're not getting outside of the bubble, then you will not have any understanding of just how bad the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop was, the 51 "intelligence officials," the big tech blackout, the impact it had on Democrat and independent voters, etc. Those are not opinions. They are facts.
-
There is no putting lipstick on this pig. Driving 170 mph while smoking crack is deadly. That crackhead should be in jail.
Perhaps, but the reason he isn't in jail is because he cannot be charged with those offenses at this point because of statutes of limitations. Your best hope to see him go to jail is that he screws up again and gets caught. Many people don't permanently change their bad behavior or stay off drugs. I have no idea how many times Hunter has been in rehab, but it would not surprise me if it was more than once. I hope for Hunter and his family that he is and remains sober, just as I would for anyone suffering from addiction.
-
Coach is right. What Grape Ape cited are facts. But if you don't actually read or listen to news outside of the mainstream media, you may not know. Just pick a random day and evaluate the lead stories on CNN, Huffington Post, Fox News, and Newsmax. Wildly different coverage. If you're not getting outside of the bubble, then you will not have any understanding of just how bad the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop was, the 51 "intelligence officials," the big tech blackout, the impact it had on Democrat and independent voters, etc. Those are not opinions. They are facts.
Basically what you are trying to tell me is that Main Stream media, such as CNN lies and the right biased media you listed tells the truth.
-
Perhaps, but the reason he isn't in jail is because he cannot be charged with those offenses at this point because of statutes of limitations. Your best hope to see him go to jail is that he screws up again and gets caught. Many people don't permanently change their bad behavior or stay off drugs. I have no idea how many times Hunter has been in rehab, but it would not surprise me if it was more than once. I hope for Hunter and his family that he is and remains sober, just as I would for anyone suffering from addiction.
The reason Hunter Biden is not in jail is because he is the Democrat son of the POTUS.
-
Basically what you are trying to tell me is that Main Stream media, such as CNN lies and the right biased media you listed tells the truth.
lol. Ok. Whatever.
-
lol. Ok. Whatever.
This looks like a copout. ;)
-
There is no putting lipstick on this pig. Driving 170 mph while smoking crack is deadly. That crackhead should be in jail.
Most definitely he should - only as prime has pointed out time limits have expired
To prosecute the vile scumbag khvnt - hope he snorts himself to death very soon.
-
Actually it is neither unless you are caught. :D He received neither a moving violation or a felony.
172mph is actually quite slow compared to how fast you wake up thinking about him everyday.
Then I guess with that photo , he’s been caught.
-
Then I guess with that photo , he’s been caught.
So where is the ticket then? ::)
-
Then I guess with that photo , he’s been caught.
Once upon a time it was believed that a picture was worth a thousand words. Along came photoshop, selfies and more recently AI. Now pictures, photos and videos are practically worthless.
And before you get your posing thong in a knot, I am not saying that selfie of Hunter is fake. He has copped to his (hopefully) prior addictions, which included alcohol, cocaine and who knows what else. Addicts are very unpredictable; they have been known to do things no one in their right mind would ever think of doing. Note: In my opinion, driving at excessively high speeds on public roads, is crazy. Taking a selfie of oneself while doing this is beyond crazy. Therefore, anyone doing it is not in their right mind. Maybe he was hoping to record his own suicide.
It is unlikely that if there were no statute of limitations that selfie would not get him convicted of reckless driving or any other crime. He might be ticketed for distracted driving which currently is illegal in 24 states, including D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands all of which prohibit all drivers from using hand-held cell phones while driving.
-
There is no putting lipstick on this pig. Driving 170 mph while smoking crack is deadly. That crackhead should be in jail.
driving 170 is deadly
smoking crack is deadly
doing both at the same time is double jeopardy, so that means he's innocent.
office joke
-
driving 170 is deadly
smoking crack is deadly
doing both at the same time is double jeopardy, so that means he's innocent.
office joke
Except no picture shows him doing both at the same time. :'(
-
"Hunter Biden" ::) ::)
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
-
Driving 170+ while smoking crack is not easy.
-
I feel that you believe this is how these things came down when they have been and continue to be contrary to what you claim. I feel you unfortunately wear blinders, at least when it comes to your political viewpoint.
I'm surprised by two things here - your completely dismissive post, then the doubling down about the blinders. When I make statements, I tend to look for things that are factually evident and I've researched (I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but this news is fresh). When I make opinions, I tend to be clear that they are opinions.
What I posted has come out recently in the senate testimonies, not from any network - you can watch them on various sources like youtube. Specifically, ex CIA director Michael Morrell's testimony:
Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell testified before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, and revealed that Blinken was "the impetus" of the public statement signed in October 2020 that implied the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was disinformation.
Couple that with the fact that IRS whistleblowers confirmed the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was real in 2019, it stands that Blinken, and Biden knew it was real at the time of the procurement of the letter, and at the time of the debate.
I never posted sources, so unsure why you went here after coach and dos equis pressed you:
Basically what you are trying to tell me is that Main Stream media, such as CNN lies and the right biased media you listed tells the truth.
I don't go to "right wing" sources. I barely see fox except for a snippet or two weekly. I go to independent journalists mostly, listen to the Breaking Points podcast with Krystal and Sagar, and read or watch the actual testimonies.
So, given that you said specifically what I posted was the opposite of reality, what news source did you see that posts something to the contrary? If there's a lefty site that disproves of what I posted, I will read and re-evaluate.
-
I'm surprised by two things here - your completely dismissive post, then the doubling down about the blinders. When I make statements, I tend to look for things that are factually evident and I've researched (I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but this news is fresh). When I make opinions, I tend to be clear that they are opinions.
What I posted has come out recently in the senate testimonies, not from any network - you can watch them on various sources like youtube. Specifically, ex CIA director Michael Morrell's testimony:
Couple that with the fact that IRS whistleblowers confirmed the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was real in 2019, it stands that Blinken, and Biden knew it was real at the time of the procurement of the letter, and at the time of the debate.
I never posted sources, so unsure why you went here after coach and dos equis pressed you:
I don't go to "right wing" sources. I barely see fox except for a snippet or two weekly. I go to independent journalists mostly, listen to the Breaking Points podcast with Krystal and Sagar, and read or watch the actual testimonies.
So, given that you said specifically what I posted was the opposite of reality, what news source did you see that posts something to the contrary? If there's a lefty site that disproves of what I posted, I will read and re-evaluate.
You’re not going to get the answer you want, I don’t really see why you spend time putting together a well thought out post, unless you really think he’s going to break character and answer one of these times, and do it in a way that he just denies the incident happened at all.
-
You’re not going to get the answer you want, I don’t really see why you spend time putting together a well thought out post, unless you really think he’s going to break character and answer one of these times, and do it in a way that he just denies the incident happened at all.
Dont bother trying to talk facts with Prime Cokk-Sukker.
Biggest retard on the forum... There's 2 sides to everything, this dumb kvnt only see's one and has a very closed (and damaged) mind...
-
Dont bother trying to talk facts with Prime Cokk-Sukker.
Biggest retard on the forum... There's 2 sides to everything, this dumb kvnt only see's one and has a very closed (and damaged) mind...
Nah, he's answered my stuff before much better. I wouldn't normally even care, but I have been pretty into the issue of media manipulation, etc, and genuinely wanted to know how he could be so confident in his dismission of what I posted, to the point where he said the opposite was actually true.
-
I'm surprised by two things here - your completely dismissive post, then the doubling down about the blinders. When I make statements, I tend to look for things that are factually evident and I've researched (I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but this news is fresh). When I make opinions, I tend to be clear that they are opinions.
Sorry if my post was dismissive. Everyone, including me makes mistakes. It is good that you make clear what is an opinion and what is not.
What I posted has come out recently in the senate testimonies, not from any network - you can watch them on various sources like youtube. Specifically, ex CIA director Michael Morrell's testimony:
Thanks for the suggestion to watch the Senate testimonies on YouTube. Previously when I watched congressional investigations it seemed like the congress person spent too much time "grandstanding". They state what happened as fact and doing most of the talking rather than asking the person testifying a question and then letting them answer it. These Congress people like hearing themselves talk so much that they often ignore the testifier's answer or worse cut them off completely. But having said this, I will give this venue another shot.
Couple that with the fact that IRS whistleblowers confirmed the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was real in 2019, it stands that Blinken, and Biden knew it was real at the time of the procurement of the letter, and at the time of the debate.
Just to be clear, I do not believe I ever maintained that Hunter's laptop was not real. It is likely that it is real and that there is some 'interesting' information on it. It a shame that Hunter Biden's drug fueled bad personal behavior gets so much attention. Is it meant to distract folks from other more important information found on laptop or just to 'pile it on'.
I never posted sources, so unsure why you went here after coach and dos equis pressed you:
I don't go to "right wing" sources. I barely see fox except for a snippet or two weekly. I go to independent journalists mostly, listen to the Breaking Points podcast with Krystal and Sagar, and read or watch the actual testimonies.
So, given that you said specifically what I posted was the opposite of reality, what news source did you see that posts something to the contrary? If there's a lefty site that disproves of what I posted, I will read and re-evaluate.
In a nutshell, I believe it is difficult to know what is true and what isn't because so much of what the media on both sides says is sensationalized and overstated, blowing incidents out of proportion. CNN's breaking news is usually not news at all because they have been discussing it for days. Fortunately, as of late when I watch CNN, I noticed they have backed away from calling everything 'breaking news'. The times I watched FOX it seemed to me to be opinions rather than news.
-
Yup... a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere.
In 2023 his treasonous father is still in the WH. Should we stop living in the present, Shithead!
-
In 2023 his treasonous father is still in the WH. Should we stop living in the present, Shithead!
That Biden is treasonous is a matter of your opinion. Can you outline for me the treasonous crimes you think he should be charged with?
-
That Biden is treasonous is a matter of your opinion. Can you outline for me the treasonous crimes you think he should be charged with?
40 million dollars worth of treason. I cannot help that you're deaf, dumb and blind.
-
40 million dollars worth of treason. I cannot help that you're deaf, dumb and blind.
Where is the list of Biden’s treasonous activities? Can't come up with it? Also where did you get the $40 million figure from... your head? ::)
-
Where is the list of Biden’s treasonous activities? Can't come up with it? Also where did you get the $40 million figure from... your head? ::)
You know you’ve won the argument when they attempt to justify one wackadoodle comment with another wackadoodle comment as if it proves anything.
-
Where is the list of Biden’s treasonous activities? Can't come up with it? Also where did you get the $40 million figure from... your head? ::)
There is compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery. I'm sure you want Congress and the DOJ to get to the bottom of this.
-
There is compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery. I'm sure you want Congress and the DOJ to get to the bottom of this.
.
Of course we do. So they can find solid evidence. Which is vastly different than compelling evidence. If it’s there they will find it.
-
.
Of course we do. So they can find solid evidence. Which is vastly different than compelling evidence. If it’s there they will find it.
#MeToo. I was very happy when the GOP controlled Congress investigated Hillary over Benghazi. $50 million later and hours of her taking the stand like a man and they came away with nothing. Except for the fact that their budget that Congress reduced spending on embassy security. That worked out pretty well. 🙄
-
There is compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery. I'm sure you want Congress and the DOJ to get to the bottom of this.
You are correct, I do want Congress to resolve this one way or another with assistance from the DOJ. Not that the resolution will satisfy some people, whether politically liberal or conservative. There will be folks who will cry foul; there always is.
Could you outline the compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery, particularly that which points to President Biden?
-
ust to be clear, I do not believe I ever maintained that Hunter's laptop was not real. It is likely that it is real and that there is some 'interesting' information on it. It a shame that Hunter Biden's drug fueled bad personal behavior gets so much attention. Is it meant to distract folks from other more important information found on laptop or just to 'pile it on'.
Thanks for the response.
To circle back, we agree the laptop is real, and now the whistleblower from the IRS confirmed it was real, and known real since 2019. The first Biden/Trump debate was in 2020, and the letter from the 51 was procured by Blinken in 2020.
Therefore, given that confirmation, Biden lied in the debate on this subject, and Blinken procured the letter knowing it was real as well, which were two of my points.
And it worked.
-
#MeToo. I was very happy when the GOP controlled Congress investigated Hillary over Benghazi. $50 million later and hours of her taking the stand like a man and they came away with nothing. Except for the fact that their budget that Congress reduced spending on embassy security. That worked out pretty well. 🙄
Except the evidence showed she (and Obama) lied about whether the attack was caused by an obscure internet video, when they both knew it was a terrorist attack. This is like saying Hillary Clinton didn't break the law with her private server, deleting emails that were under subpoena, and smashing cell phones with hammers, because she was never prosecuted. The fact there were no consequences is just a symptom of the swamp.
-
You are correct, I do want Congress to resolve this one way or another with assistance from the DOJ. Not that the resolution will satisfy some people, whether politically liberal or conservative. There will be folks who will cry foul; there always is.
Could you outline the compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery, particularly that which points to President Biden?
The DOJ isn't going conduct a fair investigation of itself or its boss.
Regarding evidence of influence peddling and bribery, it's all in plain view.
1. Biden threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden's employer.
2. An audio recording of Biden admitting this, saying he was prepared to hold a public signing after the prosecutor was fired. With the Ukraine leader acknowledging the firing while saying the prosecutor did nothing wrong.
3. Hunter Biden being paid millions by foreign entities and individuals, where the only product or service he provided was his father's name and influence.
4. Over $20M dollars laundered to multiple Biden family members through about 40 different banks.
5. Whistleblower releasing a video statement confirming this influence peddling scheme, only to be indicted days later by the DOJ. Shocking.
You're not going to find much discussion of this on CNN.
-
The DOJ isn't going conduct a fair investigation of itself or its boss.
Regarding evidence of influence peddling and bribery, it's all in plain view.
1. Biden threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden's employer.
2. An audio recording of Biden admitting this, saying he was prepared to hold a public signing after the prosecutor was fired. With the Ukraine leader acknowledging the firing while saying the prosecutor did nothing wrong.
3. Hunter Biden being paid millions by foreign entities and individuals, where the only product or service he provided was his father's name and influence.
4. Over $20M dollars laundered to multiple Biden family members through about 40 different banks.
5. Whistleblower releasing a video statement confirming this influence peddling scheme, only to be indicted days later by the DOJ. Shocking.
You're not going to find much discussion of this on CNN.
Also - what about Bobulinski? He is routinely ignored.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/
This is CBS too. Maybe it's getting to big to hide?
As an American, I really don't want Biden to be guilty of this. But Bobulinski's statement are hard to ignore, but they sure seem to be trying to.
-
Thanks for the response.
To circle back, we agree the laptop is real, and now the whistleblower from the IRS confirmed it was real, and known real since 2019. The first Biden/Trump debate was in 2020, and the letter from the 51 was procured by Blinken in 2020.
Therefore, given that confirmation, Biden lied in the debate on this subject, and Blinken procured the letter knowing it was real as well, which were two of my points.
And it worked.
Yup it worked. Those were your points. Biden lied during that debate. He should be tarred and feathered for lying but then to be fair we should tar and feather every political candidate who lies during their campaigns and in debates.,. and there probably isn't enough tar and feathers in existence to do this.
-
Also - what about Bobulinski? He is routinely ignored.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/
This is CBS too. Maybe it's getting to big to hide?
As an American, I really don't want Biden to be guilty of this. But Bobulinski's statement are hard to ignore, but they sure seem to be trying to.
Oh absolutely. Wasn't making an exhaustive list. I posted the Bobulinski interview with Tucker Carlson back in 2020, but nobody cared, because Democrats, Biden, Big Tech, and "51 former intelligence officials" were busy lying to the public and censoring information.
-
Yup it worked. Those were your points. Biden lied during that debate. He should be tarred and feathered for lying but then to be fair we should tar and feather every political candidate who lies during their campaigns and in debates.,. and there probably isn't enough tar and feathers in existence to do this.
I don't disagree they all lie in debates to an extent.
What's troubling is the lack of accountability of the media investigating and calling it out, because they sure did it to the other guy.
But, lying, having your campaign dredge up 51 signatures to support the lie, and having the lie covered by gov't agencies is a level that should piss off everyone, regardless of political affiliation.
-
#MeToo. I was very happy when the GOP controlled Congress investigated Hillary over Benghazi. $50 million later and hours of her taking the stand like a man and they came away with nothing. Except for the fact that their budget that Congress reduced spending on embassy security. That worked out pretty well. 🙄
Real interesting how she wasn't charged for anything since all of the phones and laptops containing evidence were destroyed. ::)
I have to hand it to liberals, they stick together and cover each others asses no matter how big the crimes.
-
Yup it worked. Those were your points. Biden lied during that debate. He should be tarred and feathered for lying but then to be fair we should tar and feather every political candidate who lies during their campaigns and in debates.,. and there probably isn't enough tar and feathers in existence to do this.
My solace with your posts is that you won't be around much longer to pollute the boards with your absurdity.
-
Yup it worked. Those were your points. Biden lied during that debate. He should be tarred and feathered for lying but then to be fair we should tar and feather every political candidate who lies during their campaigns and in debates.,. and there probably isn't enough tar and feathers in existence to do this.
He is a habitual liar
A crook & a pedophile
-
My solace with your posts is that you won't be around much longer to pollute the boards with your absurdity.
My doctor says I have at least 20 more years in me. Don't know how old you are but my guess is you are older than your juvenile posts suggest. So there is the possibility I will outlive you.
-
My doctor says I have at least 20 more years in me. Don't know how old you are but my guess is you are older than your juvenile posts suggest. So there is the possibility I will outlive you.
Your doctor has a sense of humor I see.
-
Except the evidence showed she (and Obama) lied about whether the attack was caused by an obscure internet video, when they both knew it was a terrorist attack. This is like saying Hillary Clinton didn't break the law with her private server, deleting emails that were under subpoena, and smashing cell phones with hammers, because she was never prosecuted. The fact there were no consequences is just a symptom of the swamp.
And yet the GOP investigation and outcome acquitted her. Vindicated. :D
-
And yet the GOP investigation and outcome acquitted her. Vindicated. :D
Retard..
This was a complete lie…
-
Your doctor has a sense of humor I see.
Would you like me to hook you up with him? My annual wellness check is later this month. While there, I can ask him if he is accepting any new patients. He is really cool. Plus he is a DO, so if you throw something out he can take care of that too. He is like a chiropractor and a GP all in one.
-
Real interesting how she wasn't charged for anything since all of the phones and laptops containing evidence were destroyed. ::)
I have to hand it to liberals, they stick together and cover each others asses no matter how big the crimes.
Truth.
-
Retard..
This was a complete lie…
Hillary = acquitted. That is a FACT. Something you know nothing about. Retard.