Hunter Biden driving 172mph while smoking crack

[LurkerNoMore]

driving 170 is deadly
smoking crack is deadly
doing both at the same time is double jeopardy, so that means he's innocent.


office joke

Except no picture shows him doing both at the same time. 

[Gym Rat]

"Hunter Biden"   

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

[IroNat]

Driving 170+ while smoking crack is not easy.

[Grape Ape]

I feel that you believe this is how these things came down when they have been and continue to be contrary to what you claim. I feel  you unfortunately wear blinders, at least when it comes to your political viewpoint.

I'm surprised by two things here - your completely dismissive post, then the doubling down about the blinders.  When I make statements, I tend to look for things that are factually evident and I've researched (I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but this news is fresh).  When I make opinions, I tend to be clear that they are opinions.

What I posted has come out recently in the senate testimonies, not from any network - you can watch them on various sources like youtube.  Specifically, ex CIA director Michael Morrell's testimony:

Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell testified before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, and revealed that Blinken was "the impetus" of the public statement signed in October 2020 that implied the laptop belonging to Hunter Biden was disinformation.

Couple that with the fact that IRS whistleblowers confirmed the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was real in 2019, it stands that Blinken, and Biden knew it was real at the time of the procurement of the letter, and at the time of the debate.

I never posted sources, so unsure why you went here after coach and dos equis pressed you:

Basically what you are trying to tell me is that Main Stream media, such as CNN lies and the right biased media you listed tells the truth.

I don't go to "right wing" sources.  I barely see fox except for a snippet or two weekly.  I go to independent journalists mostly, listen to the Breaking Points podcast with Krystal and Sagar, and read or watch the actual testimonies.

So, given that you said specifically what I posted was the opposite of reality, what news source did you see that posts something to the contrary?  If there's a lefty site that disproves of what I posted, I will read and re-evaluate.

[Irongrip400]

I'm surprised by two things here - your completely dismissive post, then the doubling down about the blinders.  When I make statements, I tend to look for things that are factually evident and I've researched (I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but this news is fresh).  When I make opinions, I tend to be clear that they are opinions.

What I posted has come out recently in the senate testimonies, not from any network - you can watch them on various sources like youtube.  Specifically, ex CIA director Michael Morrell's testimony:

Couple that with the fact that IRS whistleblowers confirmed the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was real in 2019, it stands that Blinken, and Biden knew it was real at the time of the procurement of the letter, and at the time of the debate.

I never posted sources, so unsure why you went here after coach and dos equis pressed you:

I don't go to "right wing" sources.  I barely see fox except for a snippet or two weekly.  I go to independent journalists mostly, listen to the Breaking Points podcast with Krystal and Sagar, and read or watch the actual testimonies.

So, given that you said specifically what I posted was the opposite of reality, what news source did you see that posts something to the contrary?  If there's a lefty site that disproves of what I posted, I will read and re-evaluate.

You’re not going to get the answer you want, I don’t really see why you spend time putting together a well thought out post, unless you really think he’s going to break character and answer one of these times, and do it in a way that he just denies the incident happened at all.

[Gym Rat]

You’re not going to get the answer you want, I don’t really see why you spend time putting together a well thought out post, unless you really think he’s going to break character and answer one of these times, and do it in a way that he just denies the incident happened at all.

Dont bother trying to talk facts with Prime Cokk-Sukker.
Biggest retard on the forum... There's 2 sides to everything, this dumb kvnt only see's one and has a very closed (and damaged) mind...

[Grape Ape]

Dont bother trying to talk facts with Prime Cokk-Sukker.
Biggest retard on the forum... There's 2 sides to everything, this dumb kvnt only see's one and has a very closed (and damaged) mind...

Nah, he's answered my stuff before much better.  I wouldn't normally even care, but I have been pretty into the issue of media manipulation, etc, and genuinely wanted to know how he could be so confident in his dismission of what I posted, to the point where he said the opposite was actually true.

[Primemuscle]

I'm surprised by two things here - your completely dismissive post, then the doubling down about the blinders.  When I make statements, I tend to look for things that are factually evident and I've researched (I'm sure I've made a few mistakes, but this news is fresh).  When I make opinions, I tend to be clear that they are opinions.

Sorry if my post was dismissive. Everyone, including me makes mistakes. It is good that you make clear what is an opinion and what is not.

What I posted has come out recently in the senate testimonies, not from any network - you can watch them on various sources like youtube.  Specifically, ex CIA director Michael Morrell's testimony:

Thanks for the suggestion to watch the Senate testimonies on YouTube.  Previously when I watched congressional investigations it seemed like the congress person spent too much time "grandstanding". They state what happened as fact and doing most of the talking rather than asking the person testifying a question and then letting them answer it. These Congress people like hearing themselves talk so much that they often ignore the testifier's answer or worse cut them off completely. But having said this, I will give this venue another shot.

Couple that with the fact that IRS whistleblowers confirmed the FBI knew the Hunter laptop was real in 2019, it stands that Blinken, and Biden knew it was real at the time of the procurement of the letter, and at the time of the debate.

Just to be clear, I do not believe I ever maintained that Hunter's laptop was not real. It is likely that it is real and that there is some 'interesting' information on it. It a shame that Hunter Biden's drug fueled bad personal behavior gets so much attention. Is it meant to distract folks from other more important information found on laptop or just to 'pile it on'.     

I never posted sources, so unsure why you went here after coach and dos equis pressed you:

I don't go to "right wing" sources.  I barely see fox except for a snippet or two weekly.  I go to independent journalists mostly, listen to the Breaking Points podcast with Krystal and Sagar, and read or watch the actual testimonies.

So, given that you said specifically what I posted was the opposite of reality, what news source did you see that posts something to the contrary?  If there's a lefty site that disproves of what I posted, I will read and re-evaluate.

In a nutshell, I believe it is difficult to know what is true and what isn't because so much of what the media on both sides says is sensationalized and overstated, blowing incidents out of proportion. CNN's breaking news is usually not news at all because they have been discussing it for days. Fortunately, as of late when I watch CNN, I noticed they have backed away from calling everything 'breaking news'. The times I watched FOX it seemed to me to be opinions rather than news.

[deadz]

Yup... a lot has happened since 2018. Stop living in the past... it will get you nowhere.

In 2023 his treasonous father is still in the WH. Should we stop living in the present, Shithead!

[Primemuscle]

In 2023 his treasonous father is still in the WH. Should we stop living in the present, Shithead!

That Biden is treasonous is a matter of your opinion. Can you outline for me the treasonous crimes you think he should be charged with?

[deadz]

That Biden is treasonous is a matter of your opinion. Can you outline for me the treasonous crimes you think he should be charged with?

40 million dollars worth of treason. I cannot help that you're deaf, dumb and blind.

[Primemuscle]

40 million dollars worth of treason. I cannot help that you're deaf, dumb and blind.

Where is the list of Biden’s treasonous activities? Can't come up with it? Also where did you get the $40 million figure from... your head? 

[LurkerNoMore]

Where is the list of Biden’s treasonous activities? Can't come up with it? Also where did you get the $40 million figure from... your head? 

You know you’ve won the argument when they attempt to justify one wackadoodle comment with another wackadoodle comment as if it proves anything.

[Dos Equis]

Where is the list of Biden’s treasonous activities? Can't come up with it? Also where did you get the $40 million figure from... your head? 

There is compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery.  I'm sure you want Congress and the DOJ to get to the bottom of this. 

[LurkerNoMore]

There is compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery.  I'm sure you want Congress and the DOJ to get to the bottom of this.

.   

Of course we do.  So they can find solid evidence. Which is vastly different than compelling evidence. If it’s there they will find it.

[AbrahamG]

.   

Of course we do.  So they can find solid evidence. Which is vastly different than compelling evidence. If it’s there they will find it.

#MeToo. I was very happy when the GOP controlled Congress investigated Hillary over Benghazi. $50 million later and hours of her taking the stand like a man and they came away with nothing. Except for the fact that their budget that Congress reduced spending on embassy security. That worked out pretty well. 🙄

[Primemuscle]

There is compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery.  I'm sure you want Congress and the DOJ to get to the bottom of this.

You are correct, I do want Congress to resolve this one way or another with assistance from the DOJ. Not that the resolution will satisfy some people, whether politically liberal or conservative. There will be folks who will cry foul; there always is.

Could you outline the compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery, particularly that which points to President Biden?

[Grape Ape]

ust to be clear, I do not believe I ever maintained that Hunter's laptop was not real. It is likely that it is real and that there is some 'interesting' information on it. It a shame that Hunter Biden's drug fueled bad personal behavior gets so much attention. Is it meant to distract folks from other more important information found on laptop or just to 'pile it on'.

Thanks for the response.

To circle back, we agree the laptop is real, and  now the whistleblower from the IRS confirmed it was real, and known real since 2019. The first Biden/Trump debate was in 2020, and the letter from the 51 was procured by Blinken in 2020.

Therefore, given that confirmation, Biden lied in the debate on this subject, and Blinken procured the letter knowing it was real as well, which were two of my points.

And it worked.

[Dos Equis]

#MeToo. I was very happy when the GOP controlled Congress investigated Hillary over Benghazi. $50 million later and hours of her taking the stand like a man and they came away with nothing. Except for the fact that their budget that Congress reduced spending on embassy security. That worked out pretty well. 🙄

Except the evidence showed she (and Obama) lied about whether the attack was caused by an obscure internet video, when they both knew it was a terrorist attack.  This is like saying Hillary Clinton didn't break the law with her private server, deleting emails that were under subpoena, and smashing cell phones with hammers, because she was never prosecuted.  The fact there were no consequences is just a symptom of the swamp. 

[Dos Equis]

You are correct, I do want Congress to resolve this one way or another with assistance from the DOJ. Not that the resolution will satisfy some people, whether politically liberal or conservative. There will be folks who will cry foul; there always is.

Could you outline the compelling evidence of influence peddling and bribery, particularly that which points to President Biden?

The DOJ isn't going conduct a fair investigation of itself or its boss.

Regarding evidence of influence peddling and bribery, it's all in plain view.

1.  Biden threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden's employer.
2.  An audio recording of Biden admitting this, saying he was prepared to hold a public signing after the prosecutor was fired.  With the Ukraine leader acknowledging the firing while saying the prosecutor did nothing wrong. 
3.  Hunter Biden being paid millions by foreign entities and individuals, where the only product or service he provided was his father's name and influence. 
4.  Over $20M dollars laundered to multiple Biden family members through about 40 different banks. 
5.  Whistleblower releasing a video statement confirming this influence peddling scheme, only to be indicted days later by the DOJ.  Shocking.

You're not going to find much discussion of this on CNN. 

[Grape Ape]

The DOJ isn't going conduct a fair investigation of itself or its boss.

Regarding evidence of influence peddling and bribery, it's all in plain view.

1.  Biden threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden's employer.
2.  An audio recording of Biden admitting this, saying he was prepared to hold a public signing after the prosecutor was fired.  With the Ukraine leader acknowledging the firing while saying the prosecutor did nothing wrong. 
3.  Hunter Biden being paid millions by foreign entities and individuals, where the only product or service he provided was his father's name and influence. 
4.  Over $20M dollars laundered to multiple Biden family members through about 40 different banks. 
5.  Whistleblower releasing a video statement confirming this influence peddling scheme, only to be indicted days later by the DOJ.  Shocking.

You're not going to find much discussion of this on CNN.

Also - what about Bobulinski?  He is routinely ignored.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/

This is CBS too.  Maybe it's getting to big to hide?

As an American, I really don't want Biden to be guilty of this.  But Bobulinski's statement are hard to ignore, but they sure seem to be trying to.

[Primemuscle]

Thanks for the response.

To circle back, we agree the laptop is real, and  now the whistleblower from the IRS confirmed it was real, and known real since 2019. The first Biden/Trump debate was in 2020, and the letter from the 51 was procured by Blinken in 2020.

Therefore, given that confirmation, Biden lied in the debate on this subject, and Blinken procured the letter knowing it was real as well, which were two of my points.

And it worked.

Yup it worked. Those were your points. Biden lied during that debate. He should be tarred and feathered for lying but then to be fair we should tar and feather every political candidate who lies during their campaigns and in debates.,. and there probably isn't enough tar and feathers in existence to do this.

[Dos Equis]

Also - what about Bobulinski?  He is routinely ignored.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/

This is CBS too.  Maybe it's getting to big to hide?

As an American, I really don't want Biden to be guilty of this.  But Bobulinski's statement are hard to ignore, but they sure seem to be trying to.

Oh absolutely.  Wasn't making an exhaustive list.  I posted the Bobulinski interview with Tucker Carlson back in 2020, but nobody cared, because Democrats, Biden, Big Tech, and "51 former intelligence officials" were busy lying to the public and censoring information. 

[Grape Ape]

Yup it worked. Those were your points. Biden lied during that debate. He should be tarred and feathered for lying but then to be fair we should tar and feather every political candidate who lies during their campaigns and in debates.,. and there probably isn't enough tar and feathers in existence to do this.

I don't disagree they all lie in debates to an extent.

What's troubling is the lack of accountability of the media investigating and calling it out, because they sure did it to the other guy.

But, lying, having your campaign dredge up 51 signatures to support the lie, and having the lie covered by gov't agencies is a level that should piss off everyone, regardless of political affiliation.

[chaos]

#MeToo. I was very happy when the GOP controlled Congress investigated Hillary over Benghazi. $50 million later and hours of her taking the stand like a man and they came away with nothing. Except for the fact that their budget that Congress reduced spending on embassy security. That worked out pretty well. 🙄

Real interesting how she wasn't charged for anything since all of the phones and laptops containing evidence were destroyed.
I have to hand it to liberals, they stick together and cover each others asses no matter how big the crimes.