Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on June 12, 2024, 12:33:36 PM
-
https://x.com/stevelovesammo/status/1800939692713464142?s=46
-
Nothing ever happens to these swamp creatures.
-
Nothing ever happens to these swamp creatures.
Exactly.
The Clintons were caught funding the fake Steel Dossier - small fine
Adam Schiff perpetuated a hoax against a sitting President wasting tax payer dollars - will get promotion to Senate
Biden opened the border endangering American safety - nada
Bragg will be in front of Congress this week - will anything happen? Nope (Hopefully get to see Elise Stefanik skewer him though).
So many more to list.
-
What will happen to Garland? Same thing that happened to Eric Holder, i.e. nothing. Meanwhile Bannon is looking at prison time.
But remember kids, "no one is above the law".
-
Hope so the c unt is a POS!
-
They will grill him in Congress and the pols with attack him.
If he stays cool and takes all their shit and answers with the typical "no answer" then eventually they will tire and he will go back to his life with his pension.
-
The vote to hold Merrick Garland in contempt was 216-207, with one Republican, Rep. David Joyce of Ohio, joining all Democrats in voting no. Seven Democrats and one Republican did not vote. Despite the successful contempt vote, it is another idiotic Republican led political exercise at taxpayer’s expense. One House Republicans did not vote and another voted against it. This is likely because they agree it is a total waste of time and money.
-
The vote to hold Merrick Garland in contempt was 216-207, with one Republican, Rep. David Joyce of Ohio, joining all Democrats in voting no. Seven Democrats and one Republican did not vote. Despite the successful contempt vote, it is another idiotic Republican led political exercise at taxpayer’s expense. One House Republicans did not vote and another voted against it. This is likely because they agree it is a total waste of time and money.
Yep, big waste of time and money, just like Clinton, Trump, etc.
-
Arrested? Nah. But hopefully they follow through on getting the audio. I suspect the audio will show very clearly how mentally unstable our president is. And possibly that the transcript was altered to protect him.
-
Republicans have no backbone and will not do this.
Inherent contempt
Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment, imprisonment for coercion, or release from the contempt citation).
Concerned with the time-consuming nature of a contempt proceeding and the inability to extend punishment further than the session of the Congress concerned (under Supreme Court rulings), Congress created a statutory process in 1857. While Congress retains its "inherent contempt" authority and may exercise it at any time, this inherent contempt process was last used by the Senate in 1934, in a Senate investigation of airlines and the U.S. Postmaster.
-
https://x.com/stevelovesammo/status/1800939692713464142?s=46
Unless he arrest himself. That old 1900 age contempt will fail
-
What will happen to Garland? Same thing that happened to Eric Holder, i.e. nothing. Meanwhile Bannon is looking at prison time.
But remember kids, "no one is above the law".
This.
-
Arrested? Nah. But hopefully they follow through on getting the audio. I suspect the audio will show very clearly how mentally unstable our president is. And possibly that the transcript was altered to protect him.
That's the problem, they only want the audio for political purposes only. The transcripts are publicly available. If it was released, they would chop up a selectively edit it
Need to really need to cut out this stupid counterproductive shit
-
That's the problem, they only want the audio for political purposes only. The transcripts are publicly available. If it was released, they would chop up a selectively edit it
Need to really need to cut out this stupid counterproductive shit
If the transcripts are available, it will be very easy to verify if the transcripts match the audio and vice versa. So you might have people releasing edited audio that doesn't match the transcript, or the released transcript is not an accurate transcript that does not convey everything you can hear in the audio version.
For example, this is the text transcript:
PRESIDENT BIDEN: See, that ' s what makes me think just people gathered up whatever they found, and whenever the last thing was being moved. So the stuff moving out of the Vice President ' s residence, at the end of the day, whatever they found, they put - - they didn't separate it out, you know, Speakers Bureau and Penn or whatever the hell it is, or Beau. They just put it in a single box. That ' s the only thing I can think of.
But if you hear audio which might have Biden whispering, forgetting, pausing, freezing, coughing, mumbling or falling asleep it tells a very different story.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: See, that ' s, uhhh, what makes me think just,uhhh, people gathered up whatever they found (10 second pause) and whenever the last thing was being moved. (Coughs 4 times) So the stuff moving out of the Vice President ' s apparesifoodence residence, at the end of the day, whatever they found, they they they they they put - - they didn't separate it out, you know, uhhh, Speakers Bureau and Penn or whatever the hell it is, or Beau. They just put it in a single box. (freezes for 15 seconds) That ' s the only thing I can think of.
Trump's deposition videos are available, why not Biden so they people can have a complete picture?
-
The vote to hold Merrick Garland in contempt was 216-207, with one Republican, Rep. David Joyce of Ohio, joining all Democrats in voting no. Seven Democrats and one Republican did not vote. Despite the successful contempt vote, it is another idiotic Republican led political exercise at taxpayer’s expense. One House Republicans did not vote and another voted against it. This is likely because they agree it is a total waste of time and money.
You're worried about the taxpayer? When did that start?
-
You're worried about the taxpayer? When did that start?
When the law started being applied to democrats.
-
You're worried about the taxpayer? When did that start?
Oh, probably when I started working and earned enough money to be a taxpayer... or about 60 some odd years ago. There is nothing quite like personal experience, right?
-
When the law started being applied to democrats.
Are you saying that being a Democrat, I did not have to pay taxes and there was nothing to worry about? Wow! Who knew? You could have fooled me.
Sometimes, your posts are so totally idiotic. The one in quotes above would be one of those times. ::)
-
Are you saying that being a Democrat, I did not have to pay taxes and there was nothing to worry about? Wow! Who knew? You could have fooled me.
Sometimes, your posts are so totally idiotic. The one in quotes above would be one of those times. ::)
You dumb fuck. You don't care how your tax dollars are spent until they start being used to prosecute democrats. Geez, I can't believe I have to spell that out for you old ass.
-
You dumb fuck. You don't care how your tax dollars are spent until they start being used to prosecute democrats. Geez, I can't believe I have to spell that out for you old ass.
Or so you think. But then, you tend towards wrong headedness.
-
Or so you think. But then, you tend towards wrong headedness.
I know you are but what am I? :P ::)
-
Or so you think. But then, you tend towards wrong headedness.
Your getting as self delusional as Bianca Bhanky is - the utter nonsense that you say
& believe that your so smart & clever 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
-
I'm taking a wild guess and saying no.
-
Well so much for this hope and dream.
-
Held in contempt. Happy to see his already shitty legacy tarnished further. POS c unt!
-
Held in contempt. Happy to see his already shitty legacy tarnished further. POS c unt!
Keeping his corrupt ass off the Supreme Court was the best thing McConnell ever did.
-
What a sad day for the Trumpturds. Another losing effort on their behalf.
Oh well... on to the next failure they can imagine.
---
Justice Department won’t prosecute Garland for contempt, says refusal to provide audio wasn’t crime
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Justice+Department+won%E2%80%99t+prosecute+Garland+for+contempt%2C+says+refusal+to+provide+audio+wasn%E2%80%99t+crime
Attorney General Merrick Garland will not be prosecuted for contempt of Congress because his refusal to turn over audio of President Joe Biden's interview in his classified documents case “did not constitute a crime,” the Justice Department said Friday.
---
-
What a sad day for the Trumpturds. Another losing effort on their behalf.
Oh well... on to the next failure they can imagine.
---
Justice Department won’t prosecute Garland for contempt, says refusal to provide audio wasn’t crime
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Justice+Department+won%E2%80%99t+prosecute+Garland+for+contempt%2C+says+refusal+to+provide+audio+wasn%E2%80%99t+crime
Attorney General Merrick Garland will not be prosecuted for contempt of Congress because his refusal to turn over audio of President Joe Biden's interview in his classified documents case “did not constitute a crime,” the Justice Department said Friday.
---
Corruption runs deep.
-
Corruption runs deep.
Liberals couldn’t care less about corruption….but they will when lose in the end no matter what the end might be
-
Corruption runs deep.
Liberals couldn’t care less about corruption….but they will when lose in the end no matter what the end might be
Absolutely corrupt. And hypocritical. They prosecuted Navarro and Bannon for asserting executive privilege in response to a subpoena and do nothing to Garland. No different than refusing to prosecute Biden for possessing and actually stealing classified documents while prosecuting Trump.
And the spineless GOP is probably going to just bend over and take it.
-
Corruption runs deep.
So does excuses.
-
So does excuses.
For the left side always crying about "equality" you cunts sure do celebrate when your masters get away with crimes.
-
Absolutely corrupt. And hypocritical. They prosecuted Navarro and Bannon for asserting executive privilege in response to a subpoena and do nothing to Garland. No different than refusing to prosecute Biden for possessing and actually stealing classified documents while prosecuting Trump.
And the spineless GOP is probably going to just bend over and take it.
'What's good for the goose is good for the gander.' William Barr set the precedent used by Merit Garland to avoid being charged with contempt of congress.
-
'What's good for the goose is good for the gander.' William Barr set the precedent used by Merit Garland to avoid being charged with contempt of congress.
You conveniently forgot Eric Holder.
-
You conveniently forgot Eric Holder.
The only AG to be held in civil and criminal contempt of Congress. No consequences.
-
The only AG to be held in civil and criminal contempt of Congress. No consequences.
Obama's right hand man.
-
You conveniently forgot Eric Holder.
Well then, thanks for the reminder.
-
For the left side always crying about "equality" you cunts sure do celebrate when your masters get away with crimes.
For the right side always crying about "stolen elections", "fake birth certificates", and "covid assassinations", you fatties sure do celebrate when your orange toddler peddles new lies to support your insecure excuses for losing.
-
For the right side always crying about "stolen elections", "fake birth certificates", and "covid assassinations", you fatties sure do celebrate when your orange toddler peddles new lies to support your insecure excuses for losing.
You are far more interested in Trumps every day life than the rest of us. It shows with you post history, weirdo.
-
Obama's right hand man.
Yep. Holder was Obama's self-proclaimed wingman.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eric-holder-who-once-called-himself-obamas-wingman-calls-out-barr-for-being-controlled-by-trump
-
Yep. Holder was Obama's self-proclaimed wingman.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/eric-holder-who-once-called-himself-obamas-wingman-calls-out-barr-for-being-controlled-by-trump
Probably his wingman to help pick up men as well.
-
If the transcripts are available, it will be very easy to verify if the transcripts match the audio and vice versa. So you might have people releasing edited audio that doesn't match the transcript, or the released transcript is not an accurate transcript that does not convey everything you can hear in the audio version.
For example, this is the text transcript:
PRESIDENT BIDEN: See, that ' s what makes me think just people gathered up whatever they found, and whenever the last thing was being moved. So the stuff moving out of the Vice President ' s residence, at the end of the day, whatever they found, they put - - they didn't separate it out, you know, Speakers Bureau and Penn or whatever the hell it is, or Beau. They just put it in a single box. That ' s the only thing I can think of.
But if you hear audio which might have Biden whispering, forgetting, pausing, freezing, coughing, mumbling or falling asleep it tells a very different story.
PRESIDENT BIDEN: See, that ' s, uhhh, what makes me think just,uhhh, people gathered up whatever they found (10 second pause) and whenever the last thing was being moved. (Coughs 4 times) So the stuff moving out of the Vice President ' s apparesifoodence residence, at the end of the day, whatever they found, they they they they they put - - they didn't separate it out, you know, uhhh, Speakers Bureau and Penn or whatever the hell it is, or Beau. They just put it in a single box. (freezes for 15 seconds) That ' s the only thing I can think of.
Trump's deposition videos are available, why not Biden so they people can have a complete picture?
Transcripts match and there's been no argument about it. You and everyone else knows that an audio deposition would be used for political purposes and that's what's going to make Trump lose with these altered and selectively edited videos.
Fact is that there's no such thing as an undecided voter. Both exhibit the complete opposites of each other. Better to shore up the base and make sure they are at the polls instead of fucking around
-
Transcripts match and there's been no argument about it. You and everyone else knows that an audio deposition would be used for political purposes and that's what's going to make Trump lose with these altered and selectively edited videos.
Fact is that there's no such thing as an undecided voter. Both exhibit the complete opposites of each other. Better to shore up the base and make sure they are at the polls instead of fucking around
Oh for F sake!!! So if the videos are edited and altered - why doesnt Team Pedophile post the actual videos to disprove them?
-
Transcripts match and there's been no argument about it. You and everyone else knows that an audio deposition would be used for political purposes and that's what's going to make Trump lose with these altered and selectively edited videos.
Fact is that there's no such thing as an undecided voter. Both exhibit the complete opposites of each other. Better to shore up the base and make sure they are at the polls instead of fucking around
If one man's tapes are available then why not the other mans tapes ?
that's hardly fair is it.
What are they afraid of or hiding on them tapes is a logical question.
-
Transcripts match and there's been no argument about it. You and everyone else knows that an audio deposition would be used for political purposes and that's what's going to make Trump lose with these altered and selectively edited videos.
Fact is that there's no such thing as an undecided voter. Both exhibit the complete opposites of each other. Better to shore up the base and make sure they are at the polls instead of fucking around
Of course the audio will be used for political purposes. It will help voters hear how incompetent Biden is so they can make a more informed decision in November. You would think everyone would be concerned about the mental fitness of the POTUS.
-
Transcripts match and there's been no argument about it. You and everyone else knows that an audio deposition would be used for political purposes and that's what's going to make Trump lose with these altered and selectively edited videos.
Fact is that there's no such thing as an undecided voter. Both exhibit the complete opposites of each other. Better to shore up the base and make sure they are at the polls instead of fucking around
Releasing or withholding the audio recordings is used for political purposes. But transparency is crucial especially when it comes to the government being transparent. The "altered and selectively edited" videos can be "fact checked" with the transcripts. If they match they match, if they don't point out the inaccuracies. What will happen if the audio/video does not match the transcripts that have been released though? Will this be election interference?
Most media go out of their away to pretend Biden has no senility issues and even now they are admitting they have a hard time keeping up with their coverups "fact checks".
These are videos of Trump's depositions, why are they not releasing Biden's videos?
-
You are far more interested in Trumps every day life than the rest of us. It shows with you post history, weirdo.
You are far more interested in defending Trumpys' every day life than the rest of us. It shows with your post history, fatty.
-
You are far more interested in defending Trumpys' every day life than the rest of us. It shows with your post history, fatty.
I don't care about Trump, weirdo. You on the other hand, have embarrassed yourself for years exposing your obsession with another man that you will never meet or match.
-
I don't care about Trump, weirdo. You on the other hand, have embarrassed yourself for years exposing your obsession with another man that you will never meet or match.
And yet, you are on here everyday embarrassing yourself with deflection, denial, distraction, off topic replies, empty posts, and TV static every time a FACT about the orange turd is posted. Posting facts about Trumpy is like a silent dog whistle for you.
Facts aren't your friend. We get it. Carbs aren't your friend either fat boy. And you run to facts being posted about Trumpy just as fast as you run to carbs.
-
And yet, you are on here everyday embarrassing yourself with deflection, denial, distraction, off topic replies, empty posts, and TV static every time a FACT about the orange turd is posted. Posting facts about Trumpy is like a silent dog whistle for you.
Facts aren't your friend. We get it. Carbs aren't your friend either fat boy. And you run to facts being posted about Trumpy just as fast as you run to carbs.
You LITERALLY come here just to defend a pedo. Same with prime, same with agnostic and that's what you'll all be known for on here. Pedo sympathizers. Fucking disgust me
-
You LITERALLY come here just to defend a pedo. Same with prime, same with agnostic and that's what you'll all be known for on here. Pedo sympathizers. Fucking disgust me
In the scope of things, what I will be known for on Getbig is unimportant as it would be to Agnostic and LurkerNoMore. Does it concern you that you will be forever known as the most gullible person to post utter nonsense on Getbig?
-
You LITERALLY come here just to defend a pedo. Same with prime, same with agnostic and that's what you'll all be known for on here. Pedo sympathizers. Fucking disgust me
You LITERALLY come here just to showcase your pedo projections. Same with the other red hats. And that is all you will ever be known for on here. Pedo Projectors. Fucking disgust the rest of the country.
-
You LITERALLY come here just to showcase your pedo projections. Same with the other red hats. And that is all you will ever be known for on here. Pedo Projectors. Fucking disgust the rest of the country.
It's not a projection. You know he's a pedo, his own daughter verified the authenticity of the contents, something we've known all along even before she authenticated it that you and the fake "detective" called "fake" yet you still support him, you'll still vote him, that makes you an enabler and a sympathizer. I can almost accept knowing how stupid you all are voting for a literal traitor (by it's very definition) and Marxist/Communist because you don't know any better but supporting a fucking known child molester crosses the lines of any kind of human decency.
-
It's not a projection. You know he's a pedo, his own daughter verified the authenticity of the contents, something we've known all along even before she authenticated it that you and the fake "detective" called "fake" yet you still support him, you'll still vote him, that makes you an enabler and a sympathizer. I can almost accept knowing how stupid you all are voting for a literal traitor (by it's very definition) and Marxist/Communist because you don't know any better but supporting a fucking known child molester crosses the lines of any kind of human decency.
Kind of like all the Repubs on here supporting the EXACT same thing that Dr Dobson advocates in his "parenting skills"? ::)
Still don't understand the differences between traitor, communist, Marxist, or fascist do you?
And yet you are supporting a felon, sex abuser, con man. Get a grip dumb ass.
-
It's not a projection. You know he's a pedo, his own daughter verified the authenticity of the contents, something we've known all along even before she authenticated it that you and the fake "detective" called "fake" yet you still support him, you'll still vote him, that makes you an enabler and a sympathizer. I can almost accept knowing how stupid you all are voting for a literal traitor (by it's very definition) and Marxist/Communist because you don't know any better but supporting a fucking known child molester crosses the lines of any kind of human decency.
Something very wrong with politics/ democracy if it can be called that, Both the Biden's are highly
Suspect Pedophiles with a lot of evidence against them.
Yet a few on here feverishly jump to their defence, I have to ask why ? We have all seen the Video's
& the pic's of Pedo Joe & Now the confirmation by his own Daughter !!
And the other young girl stating what we see in the video of Joe tweaking her nipple.
All of the above is freely available to see, so why are folk defending & supporting him, are they of a
Similar inclination ??
Really I'd like to think not, only What other reason is there.
-
And yet, you are on here everyday embarrassing yourself with deflection, denial, distraction, off topic replies, empty posts, and TV static every time a FACT about the orange turd is posted. Posting facts about Trumpy is like a silent dog whistle for you.
Facts aren't your friend. We get it. Carbs aren't your friend either fat boy. And you run to facts being posted about Trumpy just as fast as you run to carbs.
I come to the politics area just to make fun of you and your obsession, weirdo.
-
I come to the politics area just to make fun of you and your obsession, weirdo.
No, you come here because I post facts. Something you can't handle. It's funny how much power I have over you to make you run and post empty off topic replies whenever I wish. Post something factual about a politician on a political forum? Thump thump thump here your fat ass comes running with those cankles as fast as you can to post anything that's not topic related. You wake up thinking about me and my posts on here. They make your life complete. I own that dunce cap you have for a head.
-
Having seen Biden at the debate it is now clear why Garland did not release the audio.
-
Having seen Biden at the debate it is now clear why Garland did not release the audio.
Exactly and remember whe. The scam artists in the media attacked the WSJ when they reported a weeks ago how bad Biden is.
-
No, you come here because I post facts.
Typical liberal, I tell you the exact reason I come to the politics section of getbig and you proceed to tell me I'm wrong and make up some lie about why I come here. Just like in real life, you're wrong, weirdo.
-
Exactly and remember whe. The scam artists in the media attacked the WSJ when they reported a weeks ago how bad Biden is.
Yep. Up until recently the media kept parroting how Biden has no issues and is still sharp. Meanwhile when Hur mentioned Biden's weak recollection, Biden responded angrily with "how the hell dare he raise that".
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
Biden allies say president is ‘sharp,’ special counsel criticism is ‘B.S.’
Feb. 11, 2024
President Joe Biden’s allies on Sunday defended the commander in chief and blasted a special counsel report that questioned the president’s age and mental fitness as containing “gratuitous, unnecessary and inaccurate personal remarks.”
Mitch Landrieu, a former senior adviser to Biden who is now a national co-chair of his re-election campaign, told NBC News' “Meet the Press” that “this kind of sense that he’s not ready for this job is just a bucket of B.S. It’s so deep [that] your boots will get stuck under.”
Landrieu added that as a longtime adviser to Biden, he can testify to his mental acuity.
“I’ve been knowing him for 30 years. I have met with him personally. I’ve met with him with two people, five people, 10 people. I have been on trips with him, crisscrossing the country, rebuilding America based on this incredible infrastructure bill that was passed. And I’m telling you, this guy is tough. He’s smart. He’s on his game,” Landrieu said.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas offered a similar defense, calling Biden “sharp.”
“The most difficult part about a meeting with President Biden is preparing for it because he is sharp, intensely probing and detail-oriented and focused,” Mayorkas told “Meet the Press.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/mayorkas-defends-biden-sharp-intensely-probing-detail-oriented-rcna138192
Republicans who interact with Biden don’t question his sharpness
Many Republicans would have people believe that Joe Biden is old and feeble. Republicans who actually interact with the president know better.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-interact-biden-dont-question-sharpness-rcna119195
Joint Chiefs Chairman says Biden is ‘pretty sharp’
Amid questions raised about President Biden’s mental acuity from Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. CQ Brown tells Lester Holt that the commander-in-chief often asks “pertinent” and pointed questions in the Oval Office.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/joint-chiefs-chairman-says-biden-is-pretty-sharp-204069445504
This is by the loon Oliver Darcy but let's include it as well:
Top news outlets acknowledge Hur’s characterization of Biden’s mental state didn’t match reality
After spending weeks breathlessly questioning President Joe Biden’s mental faculties in the wake of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s explosive report, some of America’s top news organizations on Tuesday effectively stated that Hur’s characterization of the commander-in-chief was off base.
The Wall Street Journal declared that the transcripts of Biden’s deposition with Hur released on Tuesday painted “a more nuanced picture” than the report indicated. The New York Times found that Biden appeared “clearheaded,” despite having fumbled some dates. And The Washington Post concluded Biden “doesn’t come across as being as absent-minded as Hur has made him out to be.”
In other words, the Hur report offered a misleading view of the president’s mental state. That’s a significant problem for news organizations, given that much of their recent coverage about Biden’s age was derived from that very report where Hur offered a wince-inducing depiction of the president as a “sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.”
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/13/media/news-outlets-robert-hur-biden-mental-state/index.html
-
Justice Thomas just bitch slapped Garland and the whole of the DOJ. Calls Jack Smith's appointed position unconstitutional. 8)
-
Typical liberal, I tell you the exact reason I come to the politics section of getbig and you proceed to tell me I'm wrong and make up some lie about why I come here. Just like in real life, you're wrong, weirdo.
Your insecurities compel you to come here, just like the facts I post compel you to post your empty drivel. Just like in real life, it's a dog whistle for idiots. Just because you didn't include the rest of my reply in your little quote doesn't make it false. :)
-
Your insecurities compel you to come here,
If my insecurities include mocking reatarded weirdos like you, then yes.
-
Let's see if these spineless turds follow through.
Republican on powerful House committee says GOP has the votes to hold Garland in inherent contempt
The contempt charges stem from Garland's refusal to comply with a Congressional subpoena to hand over audio recordings of President Joe Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur.
By Misty Severi
Published: July 1, 2024
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/gop-rep-ralph-norman-says-republicans-have-votes-hold-garland-inherent-contempt
-
If my insecurities include mocking reatarded weirdos like you, then yes.
Your insecurities stem from the inability to cope with reality.
Your replies to me stem from the power I hold over that empty pointy head of yours and my silent dog whistle.
-
Let's see if these spineless turds follow through.
Republican on powerful House committee says GOP has the votes to hold Garland in inherent contempt
The contempt charges stem from Garland's refusal to comply with a Congressional subpoena to hand over audio recordings of President Joe Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur.
By Misty Severi
Published: July 1, 2024
https://justthenews.com/government/congress/gop-rep-ralph-norman-says-republicans-have-votes-hold-garland-inherent-contempt
Hope so, Garland is garbage!
-
Hope so, Garland is garbage!
I was just going to post but Dos beat me too it. If it passes the Sargeant at Arms can be ordered to arrest him. I don’t think (although it should) that would happen though