Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Raymondo on March 29, 2025, 08:33:48 PM

Title: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Raymondo on March 29, 2025, 08:33:48 PM
And I think I am being rather generous with the threshold.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Irongrip400 on March 29, 2025, 08:51:33 PM
Why would that need to be a thing?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Zillotch on March 29, 2025, 08:55:54 PM
viable humans are a well proportioned 5’10 - 6’2
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Coach is Back! on March 29, 2025, 09:21:05 PM
You’re welcome to try..🤷‍♂️
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: delon on March 29, 2025, 10:26:39 PM
Morning or evening height?  Asking for a friend

"I am between 5'8.5" and 5'9" depending on the time of day, but with the shoes and the big hair, I look closer to being about 5'9" to 5'10" barefoot. I might be something like 5'10.5" in SHOES, and appear 5'9.5" barefoot. Something like that."

https://www.instagram.com/matthew_thunderbay/

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Tennisballz on March 29, 2025, 10:51:06 PM
Maybe just start with white males who are democrat....when the dust settles we'll reevaluate.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: BlackMetallic on March 30, 2025, 12:55:11 AM
Mass immigration from Central & South American & Asia has lowered the American average height for males from 5’10 to 5’9
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Humble Narcissist on March 30, 2025, 01:37:09 AM
Why do people think height is an accomplishment?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: falco on March 30, 2025, 03:05:57 AM
Lying height is all that matters.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: rocket on March 30, 2025, 03:06:52 AM
And I think I am being rather generous with the threshold.

Thanks mate, I'll sneak through, just by your generousness.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Kwon on March 30, 2025, 03:12:29 AM
And I think I am being rather generous with the threshold.

What about those that are 5.8 and three quarters in the morning but become 5'9 and a half in the Evening?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: funk51 on March 30, 2025, 03:57:30 AM
Break out the inversion boots esp. for those marginal guys. Coach will be 6 foot tall before you know it. :D
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 30, 2025, 06:25:51 AM
What about those that are 5.8 and three quarters in the morning but become 5'9 and a half in the Evening?
you go shorter during the day
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 30, 2025, 06:29:36 AM
And I think I am being rather generous with the threshold.

do you have a small penis?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 30, 2025, 06:32:02 AM
do you have a small penis?
only for his height.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Grape Ape on March 30, 2025, 06:57:31 AM
Maybe just start with white males who are democrat....when the dust settles we'll reevaluate.

Astute point.

Weed out the weak and lazy.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: 1Patrick on March 30, 2025, 10:37:51 AM
Someone woke  up cranky with black eye due to lost fight to midget.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Kwon on March 30, 2025, 12:55:32 PM
you go shorter during the day

Ok, what if someone is 5.10 in the morning and 5.8 and three quarters in the evening then?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 30, 2025, 01:01:55 PM
Ok, what if someone is 5.10 in the morning and 5.8 and three quarters in the evening then?
they should work night shift................... I think....
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Kwon on March 30, 2025, 01:10:57 PM
they should work night shift................... I think....

Would Raymondo let them live during Morning though?

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 30, 2025, 01:12:10 PM
Would Raymondo let them live during Morning though?
I think they could get into bed and stretch out before he got to their house, I sense Raymondo isnt an early riser...
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Kwon on March 30, 2025, 01:16:22 PM
I think they could get into bed and stretch out before he got to their house, I sense Raymondo isnt an early riser...

Im thinking Raymondo is as diligent at chasing "Short Kings and Bunk Kigs" as Hans Landa was chasing Jews in Inglorious Basterds
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: IroNat on March 30, 2025, 01:29:58 PM
Smaller people live longer.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: funk51 on March 30, 2025, 01:31:53 PM
Smaller people live longer.
   
    ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: illuminati on March 30, 2025, 02:30:19 PM
Oh well thats me gone 🤷🏻‍♂️
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Marvin Martian on March 30, 2025, 08:24:31 PM
You’re welcome to try..🤷‍♂️

lol  it’s pretty obvious the OP (and many others it seems) have t spent much time around dangerous dudes. They come in all sizes and there are some deadly mthrfckrs that are under 5’9” (many inches in some cases). Not just in the military or other operators - hell there are some coonasses that will fck up your world. I’ve never understood the hang up on size. Obviously most of us are sick fcks that at some point chased being a freak and / or despise having bodyfat - but in the normal world it’s not really important.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Royalty on March 30, 2025, 10:06:34 PM
And I think I am being rather generous with the threshold.


lol  it’s pretty obvious the OP (and many others it seems) have t spent much time around dangerous dudes. They come in all sizes and there are some deadly mthrfckrs that are under 5’9” (many inches in some cases). Not just in the military or other operators - hell there are some coonasses that will fck up your world. I’ve never understood the hang up on size. Obviously most of us are sick fcks that at some point chased being a freak and / or despise having bodyfat - but in the normal world it’s not really important.


What the fuck are you talking about?

Your post doesn’t even make sense.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 01:30:04 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: rocket on March 31, 2025, 02:44:00 AM
What the fuck are you talking about?

Your post doesn’t even make sense.

Yes it does. He is short.  The words get garbled from the distance they have to travel.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Van_Bilderass on March 31, 2025, 03:11:27 AM
but in the normal world it’s not really important.

... depends on what you mean. Taller people get more "respect," whatever you want to call it, better job opportunities and promotions, bigger pool of women to choose from, you are probably even considered more intelligent, better everything, there's very few pluses to being short. So I'd say it's important. I'm on the short side, barely make this cut, so that's not why I'm saying it. I have noticed that almost all cops here seem to be 6'1'', so I've wondered if I could even have become a cop, haven't checked it out... for me 6'1'' seems like the perfect height, wouldn't want to be much taller I think 8)
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 03:23:06 AM
... depends on what you mean. Taller people get more "respect," whatever you want to call it, better job opportunities and promotions, bigger pool of women to choose from, you are probably even considered more intelligent, better everything, there's very few pluses to being short. So I'd say it's important. I'm on the short side, barely make this cut, so that's not why I'm saying it. I have noticed that almost all cops here seem to be 6'1'', so I've wondered if I could even have become a cop, haven't checked it out... for me 6'1'' seems like the perfect height, wouldn't want to be much taller I think 8)

couldn´t be a Tunnel Rat

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: funk51 on March 31, 2025, 04:21:27 AM
 Audie was only 5 ft. 5 inches tall and 112 pounds when he attempted to join the Marines. But on June 30, 1942 young Audie Murphy enlisted into the U.S. Army. Little did the Army know, but this youngster from Texas was to become the most decorated soldier of World War II.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Humble Narcissist on March 31, 2025, 07:43:51 AM
couldn´t be a Tunnel Rat
Another disadvantage of being short.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 07:50:32 AM
Another disadvantage of being short, you can be a hero  ;)

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Humble Narcissist on March 31, 2025, 07:59:52 AM

My dad was a tunnel rat in Vietnam.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 08:04:44 AM
My dad was a tunnel rat in Vietnam.

a very Brave man  :)
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: 1Patrick on March 31, 2025, 08:05:20 AM
Height did not affect richest  actor is the world Zelensky .
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: 1Patrick on March 31, 2025, 08:06:08 AM
a very Brave man  :)
X2
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 31, 2025, 08:07:52 AM
Height did not affect richest  actor is the world Zelensky .
If he was over 6ft Trump wouldnt have ripped him.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: falco on March 31, 2025, 08:15:31 AM
My dad was a tunnel rat in Vietnam.

It took nerves of steel. Imagine being by yourself alone in the dark, surrounded by booby traps and the enemy, in their known ground.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 08:21:32 AM
It took nerves of steel. Imagine being by yourself alone in the dark, surrounded by booby traps and the enemy, in their known ground.

and if they wore a Respirator ( Gas mask ) your vision is diminished & even more closed in
also think of these SEALS or SBS guys who go into a Torpedo tube & they then flood it .. gotta have big balls
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Marvin Martian on March 31, 2025, 08:32:16 AM
Yes it does. He is short.  The words get garbled from the distance they have to travel.


I’m Martian - far superior to mere humans. Evidently you’ve not seen the power of my space modulator.

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Marvin Martian on March 31, 2025, 08:38:47 AM
My dad was a tunnel rat in Vietnam.

Your dad has some fckn balls brother. I had an instructor at Quantico who had been both a sniper and done some tunnel work. His primary MOS was Scout Sniper. Fckn guy was intense - by far the coolest instructor though. Had a cobweb on his trigger arm. This was in 1992 so it had been a little time, so the tattoo was not very sharp. But he has little spiders in the web. Nobody ever asked but we all knew what the spiders represented.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Humble Narcissist on March 31, 2025, 08:38:58 AM
a very Brave man  :)
Yeah, but I don't really think he had much of a choice. ;D
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Raymondo on March 31, 2025, 08:39:25 AM

I’m Martian - far superior to mere humans. Evidently you’ve not seen the power of my space modulator.

I actually liked your posts, you were ripping hanky a new one quite consistently.

But if your replies in this thread mean you are a "de plane de plane" hideous malformed dwarf, I shall have to reconsider.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Humble Narcissist on March 31, 2025, 08:41:53 AM
Your dad has some fckn balls brother. I had an instructor at Quantico who had been both a sniper and done some tunnel work. His primary MOS was Scout Sniper. Fckn guy was intense - by far the coolest instructor though. Had a cobweb on his trigger arm. This was in 1992 so it had been a little time, so the tattoo was not very sharp. But he has little spiders in the web. Nobody ever asked but we all knew what the spiders represented.
Snipers are probably the baddest asses with little fanfare which is the way they like it.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: 1Patrick on March 31, 2025, 09:11:14 AM
If he was over 6ft Trump wouldnt have ripped him.
Trump's ego is 7’8” he would .
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Coach is Back! on March 31, 2025, 09:47:40 AM
lol  it’s pretty obvious the OP (and many others it seems) have t spent much time around dangerous dudes. They come in all sizes and there are some deadly mthrfckrs that are under 5’9” (many inches in some cases). Not just in the military or other operators - hell there are some coonasses that will fck up your world. I’ve never understood the hang up on size. Obviously most of us are sick fcks that at some point chased being a freak and / or despise having bodyfat - but in the normal world it’s not really important.

Yeah…I’ve never had a problem..ever. Maybe he’s feeling a bit insecure.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 09:58:09 AM
Yeah…I’ve never had a problem..ever. Maybe he’s feeling a bit insecure.

well i´m 5´7" & never had a problem against a bigger guy. I just let them come in then i do my thing  ;)
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 31, 2025, 10:01:36 AM
well i´m 5´7" & never had a problem against a bigger guy. I just let them come in then i do my thing  ;)


how would you do against killer Hankins?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Donny on March 31, 2025, 10:03:07 AM
how would you do against killer Hankins?

he would bore me
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Kwon on March 31, 2025, 11:26:53 AM
I actually liked your posts, you were ripping hanky a new one quite consistently.

But if your replies in this thread mean you are a "de plane de plane" hideous malformed dwarf, I shall have to reconsider.

HE is not that tall but VERY powerful

(https://i.ibb.co/5WDhq1ZN/MARV.jpg)
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Kwon on March 31, 2025, 11:29:31 AM
Marv was my favorite (even more than Daffy) back in the day!

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: joswift on March 31, 2025, 12:30:33 PM
he would boNe me

Fixed
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: falco on March 31, 2025, 12:32:58 PM
how would you do against killer Hankins?
Poorly, because his height varies 3 to 4 inches at times.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: Humble Narcissist on April 01, 2025, 10:03:19 AM
how would you do against killer Hankins?
I hate to ask but where has he been?
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: illuminati on April 01, 2025, 10:41:31 AM
I hate to ask but where has he been?
[/quote

Finally The Mods got fed up with his stupidity & Legal threats
& banned the Fucking idiotic Khvnt.  ;D
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: IroNat on April 01, 2025, 11:08:21 AM
lol  it’s pretty obvious the OP (and many others it seems) have t spent much time around dangerous dudes. They come in all sizes and there are some deadly mthrfckrs that are under 5’9” (many inches in some cases). Not just in the military or other operators - hell there are some coonasses that will fck up your world. I’ve never understood the hang up on size. Obviously most of us are sick fcks that at some point chased being a freak and / or despise having bodyfat - but in the normal world it’s not really important.

Agreed.

Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: IroNat on April 01, 2025, 11:11:10 AM
My dad was a tunnel rat in Vietnam.

Absolutely huge balls on your dad.
Title: Re: Any male under 5'9 should be removed from the gene pool
Post by: IroNat on April 01, 2025, 11:13:08 AM
how would you do against killer Hankins?

Unreasonable to compare anyone to Bhanky.