Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 13, 2025, 07:48:06 PM
-
Go…there is no in between
-
Go…there is no in between
explain marxism
-
explain marxism
Hahahahaa. He has proven he doesn't understand the basic concepts and structure of communism, socialism, marxism, or any other "ism" at all.
-
explain marxism
Hahahahaa. He has proven he doesn't understand the basic concepts and structure of communism, socialism, marxism, or any other "ism" at all.
-
explain marxism
Hahahahaa. He has proven he doesn't understand the basic concepts and structure of communism, socialism, marxism, or any other "ism" at all.
-
explain marxism
Hahahahaa. He has proven he doesn't understand the basic concepts and structure of communism, socialism, marxism, or any other "ism" at all.
-
4 post meltdown. ;D
-
explain marxism
Explained numerous times on here. Not going to keep on doing the work for you. Do a search
-
Hahahahaa. He has proven he doesn't understand the basic concepts and structure of communism, socialism, marxism, or any other "ism" at all.
Why do you run? Is it because you’re the enemy?
https://www.zoom.com/
-
Explained numerous times on here. Not going to keep on doing the work for you. Do a search
have you read das kapital?
The communist manifesto is quite small, its an easy read. Try having a look at see what you think. I honestly do not think you understand any of it.
Communism comes after capitalism according to marx.
He was not against capitalism per se, his text was a critique of it and the pitfalls it could ensnare one in as a system. It has nothing to do with trying to live off the government etc..
Many of his points were spot on, many of the things he predicted did not come to fruition. However, he remains a philosophical giant and his text (he wrote a lot of shit) remains incredibly influential, quite the giant in economics and political philosophy.
I would say if you haven't read any of his work then it would be hard for you to know what marxism is.
-
4 post meltdown. ;D
I'm practicing for when I take over Royalty’s account.
-
have you read das kapital?
The communist manifesto is quite small, its an easy read. Try having a look at see what you think. I honestly do not think you understand any of it.
Communism comes after capitalism according to marx.
He was not against capitalism per se, his text was a critique of it and the pitfalls it could ensnare one in as a system. It has nothing to do with trying to live off the government etc..
Many of his points were spot on, many of the things he predicted did not come to fruition. However, he remains a philosophical giant and his text (he wrote a lot of shit) remains incredibly influential, quite the giant in economics and political philosophy.
I would say if you haven't read any of his work then it would be hard for you to know what marxism is.
I’ve read not just the communist manifesto but Alinski’s rules for radicals as well. There are several things you’re not understanding. You’re referring to Marxism as it was written in the 1800’s. Him (and you) saying that communism comes after capitalism is an obviously failed theory. But regardless of that, we’re in the 21 century, not the 19th.
The left is forcing Marxism/Communism on capitalism, it’s not just a natural progression like it’s being interpreted. The left uses trigger words “Nazi” “Fascist” “dictator” with the noobs that are low level paid rioters not knowing the meaning of it and not understanding that THEY’RE the ones that are the closest to those from Nazi era of fascism.
See Rules for Radicals.
-
I’ve read not just the communist manifesto but Alinski’s rules for radicals as well. There are several things you’re not understanding. You’re referring to Marxism as it was written in the 1800’s. Him (and you) saying that communism comes after capitalism is an obviously failed theory. But regardless of that, we’re in the 21 century, not the 19th.
The left is forcing Marxism/Communism on capitalism, it’s not just a natural progression like it’s being interpreted. The left uses trigger words “Nazi” “Fascist” “dictator” with the noobs that are low level paid rioters not knowing the meaning of it and understanding that THEY’RE the ones that are the closest to those from Nazi era of fascism.
See Rules for Radicals.
Why not use those trigger words when they best describe the idiots we are talking about?
Hmmm, come Saturday, which is the date of the No Kings protests, there are likely to be many millions of these so called "low level paid rioters" protesting all over the country. Expect an increase from the 5 million who protested on the last No Kings protest which was on June 14, 2025.
-
Why not use those trigger words when they best describe the idiots we are talking about?
Hmmm, come Saturday, which is the date of the No Kings protests, there are likely to be many millions of these so called "low level paid rioters" protesting all over the country. Expect an increase from the 5 million who protested on the last No Kings protest which was on June 14, 2025.
Depends on who you're talking about. Who are you talking about?
-
Depends on who you're talking about. Who are you talking about?
The folks you identified using those trigger words. In other words, 'if the shoe fits, wear it.'
-
Karl Marx was an idiot.
-
Why do you run? Is it because you’re the enemy?
https://www.zoom.com/
It's because you are a retard. And as you have been told over and over, no one is wasting their time with a retard.
-
Explained numerous times on here. Not going to keep on doing the work for you. Do a search
Not by you it hasn't. Because you do not know the true definition or how it differs from the other "isms" you love to spout.
-
Karl Marx was an idiot.
Truth be known he was a lazy fuck that couldn’t take care of his own family
-
I’ve read not just the communist manifesto but Alinski’s rules for radicals as well. There are several things you’re not understanding. You’re referring to Marxism as it was written in the 1800’s. Him (and you) saying that communism comes after capitalism is an obviously failed theory. But regardless of that, we’re in the 21 century, not the 19th.
The left is forcing Marxism/Communism on capitalism, it’s not just a natural progression like it’s being interpreted. The left uses trigger words “Nazi” “Fascist” “dictator” with the noobs that are low level paid rioters not knowing the meaning of it and not understanding that THEY’RE the ones that are the closest to those from Nazi era of fascism.
See Rules for Radicals.
sorry what am I not understanding? what you wrote sounds like a kid who didnt read the book and is writing an essay. There has been no instances of communism after capitalism because capitalism is not over, we are tech in late stage capitalism. The idea would be wealth accumulation to meet the needs of the many which can only happen after the generation of such a thing was created, it has not been.
the communist manifesto is pamphlet. Read das kapital if you actually want to understand his critiques. Some are spot on like the increase in inequality that the system will create and the eventual and current commodification of human being. Other things were quite wrong.
Communism simply can't work unless there is enough capital and the means of production are automated enough such that ownership wasn't in the group of an elite few.
Any attempts at actual communism were doomed to failure because it simply isn't ready and maybe never will be.
Capitalism is the best producer of wealth and accumulation we have invented. However, its major downside is that its destruction is built into its machinery. Resources are finite, profit cannot be infinite and inequality will continue to stretch. This will reach a singularity and something new has to be made/done.
I have no idea what that system will be but we are in the endgame now.
-
Truth be known he was a lazy fuck that couldn’t take care of his own family
Absolutely he was a lazy piece of shit.
-
Absolutely he was a lazy piece of shit.
Leave Lurker alone!!! >:(
-
Leave Lurker alone!!! >:(
I'm really deep in that cone shaped head of yours aren't I?
-
I'm really deep in that cone shaped head of yours aren't I?
Not as much as I’m in yours
-
Not as much as I’m in yours
You are not. So there are those examples of your delusions again.
-
You are not. So there are those examples of your delusions again.
Yeah, just today on the main page. You resurrected a thread from yesterday and specifically commented towards me.
-
Yeah, just today on the main page. You resurrected a thread from yesterday and specifically commented towards me.
I posted factual info that revealed your delusions and LARPing fantasies.