Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Necrosis on January 24, 2026, 11:25:21 AM
-
I am pretty sure you can see the one officer taking the guys gun (legal carry) beat him with it then the other guy shoots him in the back while the guy is on his knees.
Trump loving he chaos he is causing in MIN to his political opponent. Go after them all I say!! Get that sweet revenge! give canada 100% tariffs for being mean to you. Threaten allies because they wouldn't give you the peace prize. Get them all!!!!!!
-
I am pretty sure you can see the one officer taking the guys gun (legal carry) beat him with it then the other guy shoots him in the back while the guy is on his knees.
Trump loving he chaos he is causing in MIN to his political opponent. Go after them all I say!! Get that sweet revenge! give canada 100% tariffs for being mean to you. Threaten allies because they wouldn't give you the peace prize. Get them all!!!!!!
Legal carry or not you dont take a fucking gun to a place where armed officers are working and cleaning up the country and not expect consequences when you try and pull it.
He must have pulled the gun or they wouldnt have known he had it.
One less dumb fuck in the world
-
FAFO
-
Legal carry or not you dont take a fucking gun to a place where armed officers are working and cleaning up the country and not expect consequences when you try and pull it.
He must have pulled the gun or they wouldnt have known he had it.
One less dumb fuck in the world
Not sure of the back story, hasn't been released yet. I think if its legal carry, you can go anywhere and shouldn't worry about what is occurring, isn't that the point?
Cleaning up the country is cool but its odd that its dem cities and states isnt it? peculiar.
-
Trump loving he chaos he is causing in MIN to his political opponent.
Pretty sure he's not, and nobody is but the agitators trying to force this.
-
Pretty sure he's not, and nobody is but the agitators trying to force this.
Ice is going around like the gestapo lol. Is the job to remove all illegals regardless of the cost to society in as non-professional way as possible? Do you think citizens having to provide proof of citizenship whilst living there day is a reasonable cost to a remove illegals as rapidly as possible. Does it even need to be rapid? It can't be at all costs.
Dude you will see nothing like this in any red state, it will be all blue, it's intentional obviously.
Trump is vindictive and petty.
-
Did he try to pull out a gun?
-
Did he try to pull out a gun?
It does not look like it from the other videos, it looks like he is body blocking someone being pepper sprayed, his wife maybe? or turning his back to avoid it, they grab him, wrestle him, he has a gun because of open carry and they remove said gun, beat him with it and then one guy shoots him in the back, another opens fire as well (from the looks of the longer video) and they empty like 7 shells into him while he is on the ground.
-
The Red Republican state local and state cops cooperate with the feds. The blue State dont and thus end up with rioters and agitators who know they won’t be controlled
-
Ice is going around like the gestapo lol. Is the job to remove all illegals regardless of the cost to society in as non-professional way as possible? Do you think citizens having to provide proof of citizenship whilst living there day is a reasonable cost to a remove illegals as rapidly as possible. Does it even need to be rapid? It can't be at all costs.
Dude you will see nothing like this in any red state, it will be all blue, it's intentional obviously.
Trump is vindictive and petty.
errr you have 8 million illegals, hes only got 3 more years..
-
errr you have 8 million illegals, hes only got 3 more years..
15-20 million
-
Who would think pulling a gun on federal agents could get you killed?
Maybe he took out the gun because he was scared?
I’m sure there is perfectly good explanation for what he did.
-
15-20 million
8 million crossed the border under Biden.. thanks for the correction..
-
Legal carry or not, fighting with officers then reaching for or pulling your gun out = natural selection.
-
FAFO
x2
-
Ice is going around like the gestapo lol. Is the job to remove all illegals regardless of the cost to society in as non-professional way as possible? Do you think citizens having to provide proof of citizenship whilst living there day is a reasonable cost to a remove illegals as rapidly as possible. Does it even need to be rapid? It can't be at all costs.
Dude you will see nothing like this in any red state, it will be all blue, it's intentional obviously.
Trump is vindictive and petty.
Why is it that all leftist men are such pussys?
-
Why is it that all leftist men are such pussys?
I think its pussy not to resist to be honest.
I am more of a centrist. You think if Biden was doing this you would be fine with it? I fuckign doubt it. You would be claiming infringement on rights, defending yourself, protecting your wife, self-defense everything in the book.
I agree with the general reductionistic stance, don't agitate etc but its simply not reality and there needs to be a sliding scale. There is this over arching belief here that cops are always above board, professional etc, which is simply not reality. If a cop was giving an unlawful order rednecks would like draw on him. You think the cops aren't acting like dickheads, letting political bias seep into there jobs, on a power trip what have you.
So the simplistic black and white thinking that surrounds situations like this simply wont cut it, these situations are not homogenous.
-
I am pretty sure you can see the one officer taking the guys gun (legal carry) beat him with it then the other guy shoots him in the back while the guy is on his knees.
Trump loving he chaos he is causing in MIN to his political opponent. Go after them all I say!! Get that sweet revenge! give canada 100% tariffs for being mean to you. Threaten allies because they wouldn't give you the peace prize. Get them all!!!!!!
GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Legal carry or not you dont take a fucking gun to a place where armed officers are working and cleaning up the country and not expect consequences when you try and pull it.
He must have pulled the gun or they wouldnt have known he had it.
One less dumb fuck in the world
100%
-
Did he try to pull out a gun?
The story is he was waving his gun around.
The idiot was fighting the officers.
There are about 6 officers wrestling this guy to the ground.
He was fighting them.
What a moron.
Darwin's Law in effect.
These people are idiots.
They lack a survival instinct.
BOOM!!!
-
I think its pussy not to resist to be honest.
Stopped reading here. You must enjoy seeing your comrades killed while you encourage them from the safety of the internet.
-
Stopped reading here. You must enjoy seeing your comrades killed while you encourage them from the safety of the internet.
Another lefty imbecile!
-
8 million crossed the border under Biden.. thanks for the correction..
You really think that is all? Sometimes the boarder was overwhelmed with like 10-20K in a day. Also notice the SNAP benefits also increased during the Biden term from 16 million people to 42 million.
-
You really think that is all? Sometimes the boarder was overwhelmed with like 10-20K in a day. Also notice the SNAP benefits also increased during the Biden term from 16 million people to 42 million.
probably a lot more, thats all the Biden admin admitted to
-
Who would think pulling a gun on federal agents could get you killed?
Maybe he took out the gun because he was scared?
I’m sure there is perfectly good explanation for what he did.
He didn’t pull a gun on federal agents. Did you even watch any of the videos of the shooting?
Personally, I think it’s bad when federal agents execute an American who was restrained and subdued. Surprising to see so many here in favor of oppressive government tactics. Well, not really surprising. Disappointing nonetheless.
-
Stopped reading here. You must enjoy seeing your comrades killed while you encourage them from the safety of the internet.
I dont mean resist for the sake of it. He was not waving a ground around he had his phone in his hand and his other hand was free as they attacked him. He was trying to protect a lady they were pepper spraying.
He was a icu nurse at a VA hospital that often did vigils and services for fallen Vets
This is ICE being out of control
-
He didn’t pull a gun on federal agents. Did you even watch any of the videos of the shooting?
Personally, I think it’s bad when federal agents execute an American who was restrained and subdued. Surprising to see so many here in favor of oppressive government tactics. Well, not really surprising. Disappointing nonetheless.
They will believe anything the right tells them to.
They have to tow party lines.
The white posted a doctored video ffs. The admin is authoritarian scum.
This is clear revenge.
-
What do you think of the idea that hiring illegals was made illegal? Wouldn't that get rid of more shitskins? What was the number Trump was going to remove quickly? I've seen him repeatedly say he'll make exceptions for illegals working for his billionaire friends, but that doesn't help the demographics :D
Please Enjoy the Delicious Taste of Boot
Andrew Anglin January 22, 2026
It seems that many are enjoying the delicious taste of boot, which they have a joyful time licking.
Personally, I was concerned that people would not enjoy the fact that the ICE raids are a gigantic performance, and that they could not possibly lead to any significant percentage of immigrants being removed. It seemed that people would prefer to remove the immigrants than to watch a performance that implies immigrant removal. But I was very wrong. In reality, people just wanted to see some fat lesbian shot three times in the face, and then they wanted to line up and lick the boots of cartoonishly evil hired psychopaths.
For me, I just wanted everyone to have a good time, and if licking boot is what people think is a fun time, and actually removing the immigrants was never really something anyone cared about, that is fancy fine.
I would think that people would not enjoy it so much when these badge guy ZOGbot psychopaths are dispatched to clean up the antisemitism that infects this great nation, but from what I’ve seen, with people who I thought knew better spamming 2017 normie memes such as “fuck around and find out” and “play stupid games,” that most will have an orgasmic time when the cops come to kick in their doors for refusing to submit to Israel and the Jews. I have to believe that the same people celebrating the ICE terrorism will be squirting in their panties when their dog gets shot and will simply beg for the stormtroopers to stomp on their testicles before these masked men with no badges throw them in the unmarked van.
I see now I was very confused. I thought this was a political thing. I thought it was about getting rid of these brown people. But all along, it was just a BDSM fantasy, where citizens were embracing a fantasy of big strong men inflicting physical pain on them.
That’s very cool. You are very interesting. I have always found disgusting fetishism like this fascinating, and I appreciate it. Personally, I am not into domination, and actually thought this was supposed to be about removing immigrants, but I see that this was very silly of me to suspect. From the beginning, when people were cheering a plan that couldn’t even deport a fraction of 1% of immigrants, I should have understood it was really domination fetishism.
I just hope everyone enjoys their time.
I advise all of you bootlickers to just keep posting against the Jews online and then in a little while here, your fetish men will come to kill your dog and rough you up before sending you to one of these camps that have been constructed all across the country.
As someone who was naively actually against immigrants and not personally into this BDSM thing that is so popular, I think it is just as well none of the Mexicans are going to be deported. Captain Boot has confirmed he is going to bury the nation in Indians, and therefore, the Mexicans will be a welcome population to dilute the number of Indians I see at Walmart. For example, I would rather see 40% Mexicans and 60% Indians at Walmart, as opposed to 100% Indians.
-
;D. ;D
Not looking good for the Donald and his administration..
https://www.tmz.com/2026/01/24/new-angle-minneapolis-shooting-proves-government-told-false-story/#continued (https://www.tmz.com/2026/01/24/new-angle-minneapolis-shooting-proves-government-told-false-story/#continued)
;D. ;D
-
he was there to massacre law enforcement LOLOLOL
like an unhinged school shooter. The boys executed him.
-
You really think that is all? Sometimes the boarder was overwhelmed with like 10-20K in a day. Also notice the SNAP benefits also increased during the Biden term from 16 million people to 42 million.
Illegals don’t get snap.
-
I am pretty sure you can see the one officer taking the guys gun (legal carry) beat him with it then the other guy shoots him in the back while the guy is on his knees.
Trump loving he chaos he is causing in MIN to his political opponent. Go after them all I say!! Get that sweet revenge! give canada 100% tariffs for being mean to you. Threaten allies because they wouldn't give you the peace prize. Get them all!!!!!!
FUCK OFF PRONOUN BOY
YOU ARE FUCKING MENTALLY DERANGED
-
Ice is going around like the gestapo lol. Is the job to remove all illegals regardless of the cost to society in as non-professional way as possible? Do you think citizens having to provide proof of citizenship whilst living there day is a reasonable cost to a remove illegals as rapidly as possible. Does it even need to be rapid? It can't be at all costs.
Dude you will see nothing like this in any red state, it will be all blue, it's intentional obviously.
Trump is vindictive and petty.
Illegals do not flock to red states.
-
He didn’t pull a gun on federal agents. Did you even watch any of the videos of the shooting?
Personally, I think it’s bad when federal agents execute an American who was restrained and subdued. Surprising to see so many here in favor of oppressive government tactics. Well, not really surprising. Disappointing nonetheless.
Your definition of American and mine are clearly different.
-
Illegals don’t get snap.
Not true.
Illegals are not eligible for SNAP. If the head of a household is an illegal and has a coveted anchor baby that was born in the U.S., then the family can receive SNAP benefits.
The Obama administration had 48,000,000 people on SNAP benefits. Trump lowered the numbers, Biden expanded SNAP back up to 42,000,000 people. I spend the winter in Arizona, every illegal here is on SNAP and selling their SNAP / EBT cards for cash.
-
I think its pussy not to resist to be honest.
I am more of a centrist. You think if Biden was doing this you would be fine with it? I fuckign doubt it. You would be claiming infringement on rights, defending yourself, protecting your wife, self-defense everything in the book.
I agree with the general reductionistic stance, don't agitate etc but its simply not reality and there needs to be a sliding scale. There is this over arching belief here that cops are always above board, professional etc, which is simply not reality. If a cop was giving an unlawful order rednecks would like draw on him. You think the cops aren't acting like dickheads, letting political bias seep into there jobs, on a power trip what have you.
So the simplistic black and white thinking that surrounds situations like this simply wont cut it, these situations are not homogenous.
Look at the average male leftists versus the average male conservative / libertarian. Leftists males are all weak looking fem boys - there isn’t a truly masculine one out there. Who the fck are the leftist going to stand up to? Lol they can’t. They can protest and butch and wine but might makes right
-
Illegals don’t get snap.
You’re missing right???
-
If you violently resist a lawful command with a weapon on your person and you have 5-6 cops on top of you trying to restrain you and you even make a feeble attempt to reach and the cop that sees the weapon and yells “gun” you should expect to get lit up.
Natural selection
-
If you violently resist a lawful command with a weapon on your person and you have 5-6 cops on top of you trying to restrain you and you even make a feeble attempt to reach and the cop that sees the weapon and yells “gun” you should expect to get lit up.
Natural selection
Do you even understand what natural selection is ???
-
FUCK OFF PRONOUN BOY
YOU ARE FUCKING MENTALLY DERANGED
Says the guy cheering on people getting mowed down in the street lol
-
Do you even understand what natural selection is ???
Clearly he doesn't lololol
They took his gun, he didnt reach for his gun, there was no need to assault him, he was not resisting in the videos I can see except when they swarm and beat him with what appears to be his gun, holding the barrell.
He had both hands up and a phone in his hand when they dragged him to the ground, escalating the situation (after pepper spraying them).
then unload 9 rounds into him. They escalated the whole situation.
-
If you violently resist a lawful command with a weapon on your person and you have 5-6 cops on top of you trying to restrain you and you even make a feeble attempt to reach and the cop that sees the weapon and yells “gun” you should expect to get lit up.
Natural selection
so fuck 1a and 2a huh? these dudes are clearly undertrained, they removed his gun dummy, he didnt reach for it and they were beating him with it. So without a gun, on the ground, with 6 officers on him, the best idea was to murder the guy?
This is a bad shooting, the fact that you cant ever be logical is on full display.
He has a right to legal carry, its irrelevant if he had a gun on him, its his right. Your rights don't go out the window because the gestapo are patrolling the city streets shaking down citizens for papers.
There is literally zero evidence right now about anything you are saying. The guy was a well respected member of the community, vet supporter and professional.
Noem claiming he is a domestic terrorist and that he was there to massacre the cops because he had 12 bullets in his legal carry gun is retardation.
-
This was wrong. I don’t agree with this dudes politics but he was killed unnecessarily. I get that some will say something like “he had a gun and how were the ICE agents supposed to know he didn’t have another” or whatever the argument may be, but they killed an unarmed man at the end of the day. They disarmed him, then shot him in what is best case “confusion” or worst case, malice.
-
so fuck 1a and 2a huh? these dudes are clearly undertrained, they removed his gun dummy, he didnt reach for it and they were beating him with it. So without a gun, on the ground, with 6 officers on him, the best idea was to murder the guy?
This is a bad shooting, the fact that you cant ever be logical is on full display.
He has a right to legal carry, its irrelevant if he had a gun on him, its his right. Your rights don't go out the window because the gestapo are patrolling the city streets shaking down citizens for papers.
There is literally zero evidence right now about anything you are saying. The guy was a well respected member of the community, vet supporter and professional.
Noem claiming he is a domestic terrorist and that he was there to massacre the cops because he had 12 bullets in his legal carry gun is retardation.
Bad shootings are going to happen if folks keep putting themselves in situations they have no business being in.
I have not followed this, as I have Minneapolis fatigue, and I know this what those funding this shit want......but given that, is any of this false:
The current information available points to a man with NO PERSONAL ID on him, but he had a fully stocked weapon at a planned morning protest at a ICE Active Aprehension of a violent illegal Alien that should have NEVER been in our nation to begin with.
None of this shit would be happening if the last admin didn't let all these folks in, the media was honest, and if local gov't worked with the feds, not against it.
-
Clearly he doesn't lololol
They took his gun, he didnt reach for his gun, there was no need to assault him, he was not resisting in the videos I can see except when they swarm and beat him with what appears to be his gun, holding the barrell.
He had both hands up and a phone in his hand when they dragged him to the ground, escalating the situation (after pepper spraying them).
then unload 9 rounds into him. They escalated the whole situation.
Imagine for a moment this "family man" had decided to spend time with his family as opposed top going armed in order to hinder law enforcement... Im not an expert but wouldnt him being with his family been a better course of action?
-
Snoooze. This is entirely FAFO and the loony leftists here are trying to agitate but no one cares. Go tell Joe Biden and Kamala
-
Imagine for a moment this "family man" had decided to spend time with his family as opposed top going armed in order to hinder law enforcement... Im not an expert but wouldnt him being with his family been a better course of action?
This would solve most things if folks just cleaned up their own yards before they tried to save the world's.
-
This would solve most things if folks just cleaned up their own yards before they tried to save the world's.
The illegals he died for would rob or kill him soon as look at him.
Judst look after you and your own and fuck everyone else
-
The illegals he died for would rob or kill him soon as look at him.
Judst look after you and your own and fuck everyone else
Yup.
But, if you look after you and your own, it ends up helping everyone else.
Good families create good neighbors, good neighbors create good streets, good streets create good towns, etc.....and all that.
-
Bad shootings are going to happen if folks keep putting themselves in situations they have no business being in.
I have not followed this, as I have Minneapolis fatigue, and I know this what those funding this shit want......but given that, is any of this false:
None of this shit would be happening if the last admin didn't let all these folks in, the media was honest, and if local gov't worked with the feds, not against it.
I agree. It is extremely unwise and dangerous to bring a weapon to a protest. However, if carrying the weapon was legal under state laws then law enforcement must respect his constitutional rights and due process. We should be willing to criticize any administration, including when it is "our side" in power, whenever civil liberties like the fourth or second amendments appear to be violated.
Like you, in this particular Minneapolis case, I don't have the full picture yet. The videos I've seen are grainy and it's hard to judge exactly what is happening moment by moment. Reports of warrantless entries and shootings are troubling and deserve transparent investigation. I also think our nation needs borders and enforcement of immigration policies and cooperation between state and federal agencies. But we can demand both accountability from federal agents and effective border security without excusing abuses on either side.
-
I agree. It is extremely unwise and dangerous to bring a weapon to a protest. However, if carrying the weapon was legal under state laws then law enforcement must respect his constitutional rights and due process. We should be willing to criticize any administration, including when it is "our side" in power, whenever civil liberties like the fourth or second amendments appear to be violated.
Like you, in this particular Minneapolis case, I don't have the full picture yet. The videos I've seen are grainy and it's hard to judge exactly what is happening moment by moment. Reports of warrantless entries and shootings are troubling and deserve transparent investigation. I also think our nation needs borders and enforcement of immigration policies and cooperation between state and federal agencies. But we can demand both accountability from federal agents and effective border security without excusing abuses on either side.
Exactly.
I don't disagree with his right to carry.
And I will wait to see this play out.
However, I would question, why he felt he needed to be there, for one, and be there with a weapon, for two.
I know when I carry, I have the added responsibility to AVOID conflict more than I would if I was not carrying, as any escalation could have higher consequences.
-
Exactly.
I don't disagree with his right to carry.
And I will wait to see this play out.
However, I would question, why he felt he needed to be there, for one, and be there with a weapon, for two.
I know when I carry, I have the added responsibility to AVOID conflict more than I would if I was not carrying, as any escalation could have higher consequences.
great poin grape
i would not bring a gun myself to a hostile protest situation. things can go south real quick
-
Imagine for a moment this "family man" had decided to spend time with his family as opposed top going armed in order to hinder law enforcement... Im not an expert but wouldnt him being with his family been a better course of action?
Right? Or if he would have just stayed on the sidewalk and whined about illegals instead of getting himself killed trying to fight LE.
-
He didn’t pull a gun on federal agents. Did you even watch any of the videos of the shooting?
Personally, I think it’s bad when federal agents execute an American who was restrained and subdued. Surprising to see so many here in favor of oppressive government tactics. Well, not really surprising. Disappointing nonetheless.
LOL @ you trying to change the narrative calling him "restrained and subdued". Pretty typical of you leftists to turn yourselves into victims when consequences come your way.
-
In an interview with his parents, they said yes he had a permit, but he never carried anywhere. Now all of a sudden he’s carrying it to a “protest” and approaching officers, great. People have the right to do many things, and do them very stupidly.
-
Exactly.
I don't disagree with his right to carry.
And I will wait to see this play out.
However, I would question, why he felt he needed to be there, for one, and be there with a weapon, for two.
I know when I carry, I have the added responsibility to AVOID conflict more than I would if I was not carrying, as any escalation could have higher consequences.
Your point is completely moot though, he is a law abiding citizen that is legally allowed to carry, what diffrence does it make. He did not brandish the weapon, threaten the ICE officers, he simply tried to help the lady off the ground and got murdered
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/24/alex-pretti-killing-witness-testimony
In no world is carrying a legal firearm grounds for being shot and killed in the back when seven officers are holding you down. They literally grab him from behind and throw him on the ground.
1a and 2a protects him unless you think US citizens should be murdered for exercising their rights peacefully?
-
Bad shootings are going to happen if folks keep putting themselves in situations they have no business being in.
I have not followed this, as I have Minneapolis fatigue, and I know this what those funding this shit want......but given that, is any of this false:
None of this shit would be happening if the last admin didn't let all these folks in, the media was honest, and if local gov't worked with the feds, not against it.
its such a red herring to claim that people are being funded my guy. You think all those folks are being funded, or do you think that there is targeted revenge from the president on his political and outspoken opponent that is causing havoc in the city and people are acting in a way that any rational actor would.
Min isn't unique in its immigrant problem.Not one red state has been targeted like this, but low and behold blue states are lol
-
In an interview with his parents, they said yes he had a permit, but he never carried anywhere. Now all of a sudden he’s carrying it to a “protest” and approaching officers, great. People have the right to do many things, and do them very stupidly.
Again, he is allowed by the constitution to do both lolol. Or are these rights subject to context?
he showed no aggression, signed affidavits attest to it, he is holding a phone not a gun and was not the source of the scuffle, it was a women.
Saying he planned to protest potentially illegal activity by ICE (like wrongfully detaining us citizens, warrantless entries etc) helps ICE's case for shooting him dead in the street is an insane take.
The way ICE are going about this is retarded, this can't be the most efficient and professional manner in which to do this. It appears to be smash and grab and to hell with the consequences, the end justifies the means.
-
Your point is completely moot though, he is a law abiding citizen that is legally allowed to carry, what diffrence does it make. He did not brandish the weapon, threaten the ICE officers, he simply tried to help the lady off the ground and got murdered
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/24/alex-pretti-killing-witness-testimony
In no world is carrying a legal firearm grounds for being shot and killed in the back when seven officers are holding you down. They literally grab him from behind and throw him on the ground.
1a and 2a protects him unless you think US citizens should be murdered for exercising their rights peacefully?
How did his gun get out of the holster? Why didn't he comply when they tried to take him down?
-
its such a red herring to claim that people are being funded my guy. You think all those folks are being funded, or do you think that there is targeted revenge from the president on his political and outspoken opponent that is causing havoc in the city and people are acting in a way that any rational actor would.
Min isn't unique in its immigrant problem.Not one red state has been targeted like this, but low and behold blue states are lol
I absolutely think these things are funded, because they are.
I don't think every individual is funded. They are, for the most part, useful idiots manipulated by a myriad of methods, who become swept up in it for a myriad of reasons.
-
Your point is completely moot though, he is a law abiding citizen that is legally allowed to carry, what diffrence does it make. He did not brandish the weapon, threaten the ICE officers, he simply tried to help the lady off the ground and got murdered
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/24/alex-pretti-killing-witness-testimony
In no world is carrying a legal firearm grounds for being shot and killed in the back when seven officers are holding you down. They literally grab him from behind and throw him on the ground.
1a and 2a protects him unless you think US citizens should be murdered for exercising their rights peacefully?
My point is not moot.
For example, if I am carrying and someone starts an altercation, my job is to avoid conflict, walk away, etc. Even if I thought I would win without the weapon. It's an additional responsibility a firearm carrier should have.
You avoid situations where something unnecessary could happen.
He did not do this, he put himself right in the middle of one.
-
Necrosis is fuming, but very carefully hewing to the more than three posts in a row is a meltdown rule. Please push him over the edge.
Times like these are why we need JPJ released from lock up.
-
My point is not moot.
For example, if I am carrying and someone starts an altercation, my job is to avoid conflict, walk away, etc. Even if I thought I would win without the weapon. It's an additional responsibility a firearm carrier should have.
You avoid situations where something unnecessary could happen.
He did not do this, he put himself right in the middle of one.
thats a moot point and wouldnt stand in court though. its debatable and at best circumstantial. not that i disagree with you
-
Necrosis is fuming, but very carefully hewing to the more than three posts in a row is a meltdown rule. Please push him over the edge.
Times like these are why we need JPJ released from lock up.
lololol
-
Exactly.
I don't disagree with his right to carry.
And I will wait to see this play out.
However, I would question, why he felt he needed to be there, for one, and be there with a weapon, for two.
I know when I carry, I have the added responsibility to AVOID conflict more than I would if I was not carrying, as any escalation could have higher consequences.
This is why so many people dislike you.
You don't stick to your values.
Which means you don't really believe in them.
Fake, plastic man
-
This is why so many people dislike you.
You don't stick to your values.
Which means you don't really believe in them.
Fake, plastic man
Kyle rittenhouse out here crossing state lines with 30 rounds and rifle, shooting eight times and killing two and he is a hero, this guy, stays at home, legal right to carry, did nothing according to eye witnesses, gets murked in the streets.
Rittenhouse a hero protecting others, this guy, a demon looking to massacre officers in broad daylight.
-
This is why so many people dislike you.
You don't stick to your values.
Which means you don't really believe in them.
Fake, plastic man
what did he say you disagree with?
-
Kyle rittenhouse out here crossing state lines with 30 rounds and rifle, shooting eight times and killing two and he is a hero, this guy, stays at home, legal right to carry, did nothing according to eye witnesses, gets murked in the streets.
Rittenhouse a hero protecting others, this guy, a demon looking to massacre officers in broad daylight.
Might be one of the dumbest comparisons I've seen so far about this situation.
-
Kyle rittenhouse out here crossing state lines with 30 rounds and rifle, shooting eight times and killing two and he is a hero, this guy, stays at home, legal right to carry, did nothing according to eye witnesses, gets murked in the streets.
Rittenhouse a hero protecting others, this guy, a demon looking to massacre officers in broad daylight.
It's a poor analogy, the situations were not the same. I saw it repeated on X today a lot.
Speaking of X here's something I read, I have no idea if it is true or not, honestly I don't care since it's not my debate I just think it was interesting.
One of the cops took the gun, the first gunshot heard was the gun going off, which (according to the X poster is not uncommon to that Sig model), the other cop thought they were under fire, started shooting, the others joined in.
-
Might be one of the dumbest comparisons I've seen so far about this situation.
its pretty apt to point out the hypocrisy of right wingers who pick and choose when to stand behind there values solely based on their political leanings. It also highlights how black and white people see things when to admit nuance threatens their world view. Rittenhouse had all these contextual underpinnings, this situation? plain as day, he was resisting after being assaulted by cops (what exactly did he do, witnesses say nothing) therefore FAFO.
Oh and he had a gun! he should of planned in advance potential futural circumstances that happen to 1 in 10 million folks.
The moving goalposts are hilarious, it shows intellectual dishonesty. Take a page out of my book, re-evaluate the situation as more information comes to light, put down your bias and be objective and stand for something.
If it's true thats my position, you appear to have a sliding scale beholden to variables that appear wholly political.
-
It's a poor analogy, the situations were not the same. I saw it repeated on X today a lot.
Speaking of X here's something I read, I have no idea if it is true or not, honestly I don't care since it's not my debate I just think it was interesting.
One of the cops took the gun, the first gunshot heard was the gun going off, which (according to the X poster is not uncommon to that Sig model), the other cop thought they were under fire, started shooting, the others joined in.
I am not sure of a similar situation that would apply. It's relation is gun laws, rights etc.. in one circumstance they stood in another they do not. Those claiming he shouldn't have put himself there with a gun seem to absolve kyle of the same thing.
There is no perfect analogy but on closer inspection the lines of flight start from common ground.
The video you can see the cop put the gun to the guys back and fire the first shot heard. the guy that took the fellas gun it gun butting him with it lololololol.
Obviously more information needs to come out but its not looking good at all.
What would be a similar situation where cops were held liable? flloyd? i dont know.
-
Personally I'm the type of guy who would never go to any protest and I remove myself from situations when I see things start to heat up etc. But reading this thread I simultaneously saw this somewhere. I remember at the time how crazy I felt the optics were since I don't see weapons here hardly ever. I don't necessarily endorse whatever Glenn is saying, but he might have a point regarding what Noem said, I'm undecided.
I do note that some here have said if the government came for their guns, even if the cops had a "lawful order" (or I guess in their mind it would at that point breach the constitution or whatever) they would light up the cops.
-
what did he say you disagree with?
don't entertain the sub 100 post troll
he's being doing this for years and has to resort to a gimmick because his other accounts get banned
-
Kyle rittenhouse out here crossing state lines with 30 rounds and rifle, shooting eight times and killing two and he is a hero, this guy, stays at home, legal right to carry, did nothing according to eye witnesses, gets murked in the streets.
Rittenhouse a hero protecting others, this guy, a demon looking to massacre officers in broad daylight.
Kyle Rittenhouse, whether or not you believe his intentions right or wrong, was there because local business owners felt the police were NOT doing their jobs, and asked for help during the BLM Riots.
This current case involved police/ice DOING their jobs, so what was that guy doing there with a loaded weapon?
The context is entirely different.
And LOL on the "crossing state lines".......as if it means anything.
-
Kyle Rittenhouse, whether or not you believe his intentions right or wrong, was there because local business owners felt the police were NOT doing their jobs, and asked for help during the BLM Riots.
This current case involved police/Ice DOING their jobs, so what was that guy doing there with a loaded weapon?
The context is entirely different.
And LOL on the "crossing state lines".......as if it means anything.
What the Likes of Pronoun Boy Brain Necrosis totally miss is.....
If the Stupid Leftist idiots just got out the way & let Police / ICE
do there Lawful job & stayed home instead of being a Fucking pain
& hindrance these oh so Innocents wouldn't get themselves into
unwanted Dangerous situations.
Only that's far to sensible & completely beyond the thinking of
Twat that got shot & the likes of Brain Necrosis.
As we keep seeing from Pronoun boy necrosis he's incapable of
thinking normally or that the actions of the Loony leftists are
responsible for there own situation / demise.
-
I think more will die with this attitude.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2015297273035370498?s=46&t=yxGBVkB2vBr9RyCGC4ni6g
-
Might be one of the dumbest comparisons I've seen so far about this situation.
You're deflecting
Out of weakness
Again
Knock it off, see?
-
You're deflecting
Out of weakness
Again
Knock it off, see?
Kyle took his gun to stop rioters, this guy took his gun to stop Ice officers.
-
Kyle Rittenhouse, whether or not you believe his intentions right or wrong, was there because local business owners felt the police were NOT doing their jobs, and asked for help during the BLM Riots.
This current case involved police/ice DOING their jobs, so what was that guy doing there with a loaded weapon?
The context is entirely different.
And LOL on the "crossing state lines".......as if it means anything.
how is him being there to protect businesses- does he even have that ability? differ from going somewhere to protest, which is protected under 1a. One went out of state, meaning he travelled to put himself in that situation vs a guy that lives there and for all we know works right there (I haven't seen any back story). It was in direct relation to your point about not putting yourself in situations like that, rittenhouse went fully out of his way to put himself in a dangerous situation, while we have no idea what this guys intention was. Rittenhouse went to defend (as per you, which is a high risk situation) vs this guy protesting (was he even protesting? or just there at the wrong time), srs question as to what the actual facts are. Peaceful protest is not high risk by the definition.
Of course the context is different, it by definition could never be the same, temporally or spatially, but thats a given with any analogy or relativism, its not an argument against the use of this argument.
-
Kyle took his gun to stop rioters, this guy took his gun to stop Ice officers.
Lol, thats not true. If it was he would have drawn his gun, no?
-
Lol, thats not true. If it was he would have drawn his gun, no?
he took his gun with him knowing he was going to hinder and disrupt officers doing their duty.
-
its pretty apt blah blah blah
It's not. It's a retarded comparison to make. Just dumb as fuck, typical for your kind.
I don't care if he takes his gun, dumb move IMO, but it's his right. Kyle didn't go out there and fight with law enforcement and potentially try to draw his weapon. When Kyle approached LE he had his hands up in the air showing them that he was not a threat. He wasn't fighting them like someone else.
Stupid comparison to make, just dumb. I expect better from you, even as a liberal whackjob.
-
I think more will die with this attitude.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2015297273035370498?s=46&t=yxGBVkB2vBr9RyCGC4ni6g
Probably fake
-
how is him being there to protect businesses- does he even have that ability? differ from going somewhere to protest, which is protected under 1a. One went out of state, meaning he travelled to put himself in that situation vs a guy that lives there and for all we know works right there (I haven't seen any back story). It was in direct relation to your point about not putting yourself in situations like that, rittenhouse went fully out of his way to put himself in a dangerous situation, while we have no idea what this guys intention was. Rittenhouse went to defend (as per you, which is a high risk situation) vs this guy protesting (was he even protesting? or just there at the wrong time), srs question as to what the actual facts are. Peaceful protest is not high risk by the definition.
Of course the context is different, it by definition could never be the same, temporally or spatially, but thats a given with any analogy or relativism, its not an argument against the use of this argument.
Did you review any context at all with respect to Rittenhouse?
He didn't drive somewhere randomly to do this. His friend, Dominic Black lived there, and stored the gun there. The travesty in this is that the police and the government were doing such a shitty job keeping the BLM riots under control, that a 17 year old kid had to feel like he was doing the right thing to go there.
So we know his intentions and why he "traveled across state lines".
All we know of the current situation is that he was there, with a loaded weapon, and didn't have ID. Have to see.
Either way, there's no comparison to Rittenhouse.
-
Probably fake
Apparently O'keffe infiltrated a chat.....saw this yesterday that he was reporting on it. Or Cam Higby....it was one of them.
Wonder why the mainstream can never accomplish this stuff?
-
he took his gun with him knowing he was going to hinder and disrupt officers doing their duty.
thats quite the assumption, maybe he went to peacefully protest, I don't know why he was there. I have yet to read any info out there on the details so far.
-
did he pull out his weapon at any point?
because of the good training of he officers they prevented him from murdering everyone which we determined he would do based on clairvoyance
this guy fits right in. Spewing bullshit. zero evidence he impeded anything, currently.
-
thats quite the assumption, maybe he went to peacefully protest, I don't know why he was there. I have yet to read any info out there on the details so far.
the left dont know how to peacefully protest because most protests get ignored and if you ignore leftists they get aggressive and violent
-
so fuck 1a and 2a huh? these dudes are clearly undertrained, they removed his gun dummy, he didnt reach for it and they were beating him with it. So without a gun, on the ground, with 6 officers on him, the best idea was to murder the guy?
This is a bad shooting, the fact that you cant ever be logical is on full display.
He has a right to legal carry, its irrelevant if he had a gun on him, its his right. Your rights don't go out the window because the gestapo are patrolling the city streets shaking down citizens for papers.
There is literally zero evidence right now about anything you are saying. The guy was a well respected member of the community, vet supporter and professional.
Noem claiming he is a domestic terrorist and that he was there to massacre the cops because he had 12 bullets in his legal carry gun is retardation.
It doesn’t matter what your perception of what you took from a video. Put yourself in the cops mindset. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat.
Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
-
Probably fake
You mean he is making it up or had a friend send it or Elon is posting something fake?
Edit- It seems it’s real, so we can all be unanimous in the fact the Democrats are deranged people who seek a shield to hide their depraved acts.
-
Probably fake
They cause ALL of the violence. From riots to assassinations
https://x.com/the_jefferymead/status/2015229162370347319?s=46
-
Signal chat is interesting.
Let's see where this goes.
-
Signal chat is interesting.
Let's see where this goes.
Yeah….he was by no means innocent
-
thats quite the assumption, maybe he went to peacefully protest, I don't know why he was there. I have yet to read any info out there on the details so far.
Just Fuck off Pronoun Boy - Its not like you don't make a huge amount of assumptions
And 99.9% are totally wrong.
Why don't you go protest there & tell the cops & ICE where & what they're doing wrong.
You stupid leftist Twat.
-
In Iran, the Mossad, CIA and MI6 handed out weapons to "peaceful protesters" so they could kill police officers, or innocent civilians if they couldn't shoot a cop. They also set mosques, hospitals and people on fire. Donald says he will bomb if Iran executes any violent protesters. What, if Iran doesn't hang anyone Donald will turn around the ships? LOL :D
Gotta point out some hypocrisy :D
-
In Iran, the Mossad, CIA and MI6 handed out weapons to "peaceful protesters" so they could kill police officers, or innocent civilians if they couldn't shoot a cop. They also set mosques, hospitals and people on fire. Donald says he will bomb if Iran executes any violent protesters. What, if Iran doesn't hang anyone Donald will turn around the ships? LOL :D
Gotta point out some hypocrisy :D
Where are you getting that information from ??
-
Fear and cowardice to shoot him.
-
It doesn’t matter what your perception of what you took from a video. Put yourself in the cops mindset. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat.
Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
Nice ChatGPT written summary, son. Doesn't change the fact that you're a spineless bootlicker without one single day's service in law enforcement or military and you're making armchair quarterback videos on subjects you know NOTHING about.
a pillar of the community who supported REAL veterans like me and my buddies who served in Vietnam got executed for calmly exercising his 1st and 2nd amendment rights and you bend over backwards to justify the costume-wearing amateur thugs because you're one of them too. If I were 20 years younger I'd kick your ass.
-
Nice ChatGPT written summary, son. Doesn't change the fact that you're a spineless bootlicker without one single day's service in law enforcement or military and you're making armchair quarterback videos on subjects you know NOTHING about.
a pillar of the community who supported REAL veterans like me and my buddies who served in Vietnam got executed for calmly exercising his 1st and 2nd amendment rights and you bend over backwards to justify the costume-wearing amateur thugs because you're one of them too. If I were 20 years younger I'd kick your ass.
So you’re an 83 year old gimmick? 😂
-
so if the bloke had not been carrying would he still have got shot?
-
Nice ChatGPT written summary, son. Doesn't change the fact that you're a spineless bootlicker without one single day's service in law enforcement or military and you're making armchair quarterback videos on subjects you know NOTHING about.
a pillar of the community who supported REAL veterans like me and my buddies who served in Vietnam got executed for calmly exercising his 1st and 2nd amendment rights and you bend over backwards to justify the costume-wearing amateur thugs because you're one of them too. If I were 20 years younger I'd kick your ass.
Haha, I forgot about this guy. Where've you been?
He was there to agitate and impede with a gun, and then did begin impeding. The 4 millionth example of someone who caused their own problem. Walz and Frey and Ellison and the rest are playing so many for fools, wonder why?
-
so if the bloke had not been carrying would he still have got shot?
Doubtful
-
I hope you aren’t supporting rioters Barry.
Is this one of your people?
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/17zGhVuJd1/?mibextid=wwXIfr
-
so if the bloke had not been carrying would he still have got shot?
Unless he tried to reach for another cops gun, no i seriously doubt it
-
It doesn’t matter what your perception of what you took from a video. Put yourself in the cops mindset. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat.
Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
They instigated the altercation, they removed his gun.
This is such an insane take that you think this situations outcome is reasonable. It went from him helping a lady up to getting manhandled from behind to executed.
There was zero threat of deadly force, where was it? if thats the case anyone they try to arrest that legal carries could be shot. Have you not seen the protests against covid? guys screaming in cops faces with guns in their hands.
-
Fear and cowardice to shoot him.
Obviously, he was peacefully protesting, in fact he was back on to them helping a lady they just shoved down. They beat him with his gun lololol, then shoot him in the back. Fucking insane. Anyone justifying this death has zero empathy and might actually be a sociopath.
-
Obviously, he was peacefully protesting, in fact he was back on to them helping a lady they just shoved down. They beat him with his gun lololol, then shoot him in the back. Fucking insane. Anyone justifying this death has zero empathy and might actually be a sociopath.
welcome to Getbig
-
Obviously, he was peacefully protesting, in fact he was back on to them helping a lady they just shoved down. They beat him with his gun lololol, then shoot him in the back. Fucking insane. Anyone justifying this death has zero empathy and might actually be a sociopath.
Why was he there?
Was there a peaceful protest happening and ICE just happened to be in that same spot?
-
Obviously, he was peacefully protesting, in fact he was back on to them helping a lady they just shoved down. They beat him with his gun lololol, then shoot him in the back. Fucking insane. Anyone justifying this death has zero empathy and might actually be a sociopath.
Don’t make stupid choices. Obviously I’m not the only one who said it…
i=s2dFqkm-BHwaIMiX
-
Don’t make stupid choices. Obviously I’m not the only one who said it…
i=s2dFqkm-BHwaIMiX
He didn't. Going to a protest to peacefully protest while carrying (which many do, right and left) is perfectly reasonable in the US. It's his right to do both.
Should he have helped the lady up? if that was his crime and for that he get's immediately gang raped, beaten and shot then something is wrong with ICE. they reacted like a pack of animals and escalated the situation beyond what any reasonable human would say is necessary.
You have lost the plot.
-
This guy nailed it….
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.
I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.
“Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.
We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
https://x.com/schwalm5132/status/2015470661490057540?s=46
-
He didn't. Going to a protest to peacefully protest while carrying (which many do, right and left) is perfectly reasonable in the US. It's his right to do both.
Should he have helped the lady up? if that was his crime and for that he get's immediately gang raped, beaten and shot then something is wrong with ICE. they reacted like a pack of animals and escalated the situation beyond what any reasonable human would say is necessary.
You have lost the plot.
If he was there "peacefully protesting" as you say......how did he end up in a confrontation with ICE officers.....what are the details?
Was he just standing there exercising his lawful right to protest, and ICE officials started messing with him?
-
He didn't. Going to a protest to peacefully protest while carrying (which many do, right and left) is perfectly reasonable in the US. It's his right to do both.
Should he have helped the lady up? if that was his crime and for that he get's immediately gang raped, beaten and shot then something is wrong with ICE. they reacted like a pack of animals and escalated the situation beyond what any reasonable human would say is necessary.
You have lost the plot.
no, any reasonable person wouldnt be in that situation.
Tell me , how many republican protestors were killed by Ice during Obamas run as President when he was removing illegals?
-
He didn't. Going to a protest to peacefully protest while carrying (which many do, right and left) is perfectly reasonable in the US. It's his right to do both.
Should he have helped the lady up? if that was his crime and for that he get's immediately gang raped, beaten and shot then something is wrong with ICE. they reacted like a pack of animals and escalated the situation beyond what any reasonable human would say is necessary.
You have lost the plot.
No, you’re just blind to reality. He did not have the right under the First Amendment resist a lawful order to escalate the situation. That crosses the line between the right to “peaceably assemble” and anarchy
-
This guy nailed it….
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.
I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.
“Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.
We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
https://x.com/schwalm5132/status/2015470661490057540?s=46
Bump
-
Here's another thing that should be addressed. Most of these dipshits don't even know why they're doing what they're doing
-
Here's another thing that should be addressed. Most of these dipshits don't even know why they're doing what they're doing
I've addressed this ad-naseum.
However, the real interesting thing will be when everyone is exposed in the Signal chat, and then nobody gets prosecuted.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
-
I just can't find myself caring about this guy. It's his right to protest, it's his right to carry, it's also his right to follow commands and not get involved with federal agents doing their jobs. It's also not his right to fight federal agents while carrying a gun. Simple. If anyone here knew about qualifying for a CCW or basic common sense for that matter, you would see how simple it is to not put yourself in that position while carrying. If he didn't get involved in the street, he'd be alive, if he didn't fight the feds while carrying, he'd be alive. He made several choices that put himself in the position he found himself in. Same with that broad that hit the fed with her car. All choices they made.
-
I just can't find myself caring about this guy. It's his right to protest, it's his right to carry, it's also his right to follow commands and not get involved with federal agents doing their jobs. It's also not his right to fight federal agents while carrying a gun. Simple. If anyone here knew about qualifying for a CCW or basic common sense for that matter, you would see how simple it is to not put yourself in that position while carrying. If he didn't get involved in the street, he'd be alive, if he didn't fight the feds while carrying, he'd be alive. He made several choices that put himself in the position he found himself in. Same with that broad that hit the fed with her car. All choices they made.
Fight?
Necrosis said he was just peacefully protesting.
Who is telling the truth here?
-
I've addressed this ad-naseum.
However, the real interesting thing will be when everyone is exposed in the Signal chat, and then nobody gets prosecuted.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Are you following Cam Higby's posts? Interesting to say the least
-
Fight?
Necrosis said he was just peacefully protesting.
Who is telling the truth here?
Negrosis is a fucking liar. It's been obvious he's trolling and it really became obvious when he posted a video of that broad hitting the fed with the car in slow motion and said that she didn't hit him. That's when it really confirmed for me that he's just playing devils advocate and trolling.
-
Are you following Cam Higby's posts? Interesting to say the least
Yeah, that's what I saw.
I have been pointing out in the poli forum about how this stuff is organized, coordinated, and executed using useful idiots, but this is on another level if it's all legit.
-
Negrosis is a fucking liar. It's been obvious he's trolling and it really became obvious when he posted a video of that broad hitting the fed with the car in slow motion and said that she didn't hit him. That's when it really confirmed for me that he's just playing devils advocate and trolling.
In his defense, he might be vaccine injured.
-
In his defense, he might be vaccine injured.
lololol
-
lololol
;D ;D
-
If Pretti brandished his gun he was eliminated, if he did not then he was executed
-
If Pretti brandished his gun he was eliminated, if he did not then he was executed
Yeah..not that simple. If you get more more like Pretti you can expect (and should) more shootings
-
More natural selection
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT-wZcKkT44/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
-
Lmao at white liberals laying their lives down for Somalians and beaners. Mental illness and stupidity of peace.
-
Yeah..not that simple. If you get more more like Pretti you can expect (and should) more shootings
More CCW permit holders at protest?
-
Lmao at liberal whites laying their lives down for some Somalian or beaner. Mental illness and stupidity of peace.
the same could be said for conservative whites and the jews, more power to the jews btw
-
Where are you getting that information from ??
You mean foreign intelligence being involved? They admitted it, at least Mossad did, including the supplying of weapons. John Bolton admitted it, Mossad admitted it in Israeli media. And CIA and MI6 have historically funded and supplied weapons to 'terrorist' groups for many, many decades. Such as MEK in Iran, which are active there now too and which they foment to get their revolution and resulting chaos. The kurds too and many others. So it's safe to say they were all involved in some capacity. Elon Musk was involved by supplying an alleged 40K Starlink terminals. On the third day of the originally more organic protests the intelligence agencies put in their assets and told them to get violent. It was all organized from abroad and once Iran blocked Starlink it quickly died down. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy - the same "peaceful organic protests" are of course not acceptable in the UK or the US for example. In the UK they arrest senior citizens holding a pro-Palestine sign FFS LOL. I'm sure Trump understands the Iranian regime very well, what they did there. He wants a heavy hand in putting down violent protests in the US the same way.
-
More CCW permit holders at protest?
More stupid people
-
the same could be said for conservative whites and the jews, more power to the jews btw
Conservative civilians are laying their lives down for the Jews? I can see the argument for US soldiers fighting their endless Middle East wars, but I’m not seeing the comparison to everyday social justice warriors dying for people who don’t give a fuck about them.
-
Lmao at white liberals laying their lives down for Somalians and beaners. Mental illness and stupidity of peace.
;D dumbest motherfuckers on the planet!
-
Conservative civilians are laying their lives down for the Jews? I can see the argument for US soldiers fighting their endless Middle East wars, but I’m not seeing the comparison to everyday social justice warriors dying for people who don’t give a fuck about them.
You didn’t see the video of the white guy and his family shot outside of the synagogue while holding the “JLM” sign?
-
You didn’t see the video of the white guy and his family shot outside of the synagogue while holding the “JLM” sign?
I must’ve missed it while on my 3rd tour of Jewry duty. Protecting the streets of Century Village in Boca Raton as we speak! Jewish lives matter! Say their names!
Morty Finkelstein
Shalom “Shloim” Goldstein
Randy Cohen
Sadie Lefkowitz
Avi “AJ” Schwartzman Jr.
Shecky Bernstein
Chaim Yankel “Hank” Lipschitz
Melvin “Mel” Plotnick-Rothstein
-
https://x.com/realdefender45/status/2015523464715686282?s=20
-
.
-
https://x.com/realdefender45/status/2015523464715686282?s=20
Summary?
-
Summary?
People are manipulated by their emotions and they are reacting to manipulation of the issue and by doing so they keep the system in place never addressing root causes.
-
People are manipulated by their emotions and they are reacting to manipulation of the issue and by doing so they keep the system in place never addressing root causes.
I watched it after, I think that broad misses out on the biggest piece of the puzzle and that is the media/social media and how they can manipulate the narrative.
-
I must’ve missed it while on my 3rd tour of Jewry duty. Protecting the streets of Century Village in Boca Raton as we speak! Jewish lives matter! Say their names!
Morty Finkelsteinberg
Shalom “Shloim” Goldstein
Randy Cohen
Sadie Lefkowitz
Avi “AJ” Schwartzman Jr.
Shecky Bernstein
Chaim Yankel “Hank” Lipschitz
Melvin “Mel” Plotnick-Rothstein
I recently received my first ever jury duty summons, I ignored it.
-
I watched it after, I think that broad misses out on the biggest piece of the puzzle and that is the media/social media and how they can manipulate the narrative.
Agreed. We have a generation that consumes information in 30-45 second clips. It’s to bad the other side can’t figure out how to share the truth in the same manner. That was a 4 minute video that explained the issue. Maybe it could have been cut down to 3 minutes?
But there’s not enough money or virtual signaling in the truth?
-
-
Should be no surprise that FBI isn’t helping the state.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crk8nxg1p4xo
I remember pretty soon after this idiot got killed I sent someone the video of him attacking that car for no reason where he was smashing the rear light.
The person I sent it to had no idea who it was so they googled him and the top story was some article with people saying he was a “kind soul.”
Funny, but scary that the truth is twisted so much.
-
I must’ve missed it while on my 3rd tour of Jewry duty. Protecting the streets of Century Village in Boca Raton as we speak! Jewish lives matter! Say their names!
Morty Finkelstein
Shalom “Shloim” Goldstein
Randy Cohen
Sadie Lefkowitz
Avi “AJ” Schwartzman Jr.
Shecky Bernstein
Chaim Yankel “Hank” Lipschitz
Melvin “Mel” Plotnick-Rothstein
LOL great names
-
Are you ok with putting MAGGOTS in Camps and Reeducating them?