Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 12:02:25 PM

Title: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 12:02:25 PM
 :D
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on October 04, 2006, 12:06:51 PM
Are you a fan of Cutler because he's a fellow masshole?  ;D

I must admit that's part of the reason I like him. Of course the fact that by all accounts he's a great person doesn't hurt either.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 12:13:24 PM
.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: SquatAss on October 04, 2006, 12:14:56 PM
Damn!
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 12:15:35 PM
I am sure all the Ronnie riders will be in soon to talk trash. But Cutler looked great this year and deserved his win.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: bailey on October 04, 2006, 12:15:56 PM
I'd love to see Ronnie standing right next to Jay in those outsude pics.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 12:17:14 PM
I'm impressed with Jay's hardness in this picture because hardness is something I never really felt was in Jay's genetics to achieve (especially in the arms).  He looks good - but post pictures of Ronnie in similar lighting and as close as those ones and you will see Ronnie looks even more impressive.  Not to downplay Jay's accomplishments, but Ronnie did have him beat in the front poses.

I do not have any pics of Ronnie thic current precontest. Feel free to post some up for comparision tho. Ronnie is a freak no doubt. He was off this past contest and payed the price. He should come back strong next year.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Nordic Superman on October 04, 2006, 12:17:25 PM
That hair has got to be sorted... looks fucking gay.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: knny187 on October 04, 2006, 12:38:49 PM
That hair has got to be sorted... looks fucking gay.


Hitler Youth haircut era 1940's
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Jr. Yates on October 04, 2006, 12:41:17 PM
I do not have any pics of Ronnie thic current precontest. Feel free to post some up for comparision tho. Ronnie is a freak no doubt. He was off this past contest and payed the price. He should come back strong next year.
i agree 88, Ronnie was off this year. people are still not aware that the contest is over, Jay won. who cares if he gets beat in the next upcoming shows, the Mr. O is the top show and Jay won. that is that.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 12:47:27 PM
i agree 88, Ronnie was off this year. people are still not aware that the contest is over, Jay won. who cares if he gets beat in the next upcoming shows, the Mr. O is the top show and Jay won. that is that.

Yah..... I think Ronnie is the owner of the greatest  physique ever in 99. I also am fair when I stick up for Cutler. At 100 percent Ronnie is untouchable. But he was not and Jay looked amazing. Jay won fair and square. As for the "perfect" physique that belongs to this guy.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: raziel on October 04, 2006, 01:00:35 PM
Are you a fan of Cutler because he's a fellow masshole?  ;D

I must admit that's part of the reason I like him. Of course the fact that by all accounts he's a great person doesn't hurt either.
thats mainly why i like him.  i tend to like the smaller, more aesthetic guys myself(as i'm a smaller guy).
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Dnizneer on October 04, 2006, 01:04:02 PM
Why is his left bicep twice as big as his right one?
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 01:07:02 PM
thats mainly why i like him.  i tend to like the smaller, more aesthetic guys myself(as i'm a smaller guy).

Haha I bet your the type of guy who strolls around at 25 percent bodyfat @ 230!!! with your jug of water,fanny pack,neon parachute pants and otomix shoes.

Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: HERACLES on October 04, 2006, 01:07:12 PM
omg, with body88 ever get the hell over it?
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 01:10:10 PM
omg, with body88 ever get the hell over it?

I see your still stalking me.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Playboy on October 04, 2006, 01:23:26 PM
:D
A very well deserved win by Jay Cutler. Ronnie will be back nect year, hopefully un-injured.

PB
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: raziel on October 04, 2006, 01:57:45 PM
Haha I bet your the type of guy who strolls around at 25 percent bodyfat @ 230!!! with your jug of water,fanny pack,neon parachute pants and otomix shoes.


ummm, no.  first off, i'm 24, a little young for the whole fanny pack and neon pants look.  and secondly, when i said small i didn't mean 230.  i'm naturally really scrawny, when i was 18 i was 6' tall and 155 pounds, now i'm around 190 and probably about 10-12% bf.  I have a high metabolism so i have some trouble putting on weight i stay naturally lean.  i am often seen carrying around a jug of water though as i like to stay hydrated.
 thanks
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 02:00:18 PM
ummm, no.  first off, i'm 24, a little young for the whole fanny pack and neon pants look.  and secondly, when i said small i didn't mean 230.  i'm naturally really scrawny, when i was 18 i was 6' tall and 155 pounds, now i'm around 190 and probably about 10-12% bf.  I have a high metabolism so i have some trouble putting on weight i stay naturally lean.  i am often seen carrying around a jug of water though as i like to stay hydrated.
 thanks

You answered a question posed to me with an answer that looked like you where saying your reply was how I was. Basically it looked like you where ripping me. Not stating why you where a fan of cutler personally. which I see now is what you where intending to do... I think?

If that is the case I take back my statement I wrote about you!
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: raziel on October 04, 2006, 02:03:38 PM
You answered a question posed to me with an answer that looked like you where saying your reply was how I was. Basically it looked like you where ripping me. Not stating why you where a fan of cutler personally. which I see now is what you where intending to do... I think?

If that is the case I take back my statement I wrote about you!
i was just saying that i'm from mass so i like cutler 'cause he's a local boy.  it's all good
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 02:07:24 PM
Dont worry about it. What part of Mass? I am from Boston. I wrote that comment because I was under the impression you where ripping me. My appologies!

Good work on your weight gain. I started out at about 160 also!
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: raziel on October 04, 2006, 02:08:42 PM
Dont worry about it. What part of Mass? I am from Boston. I wrote that comment because I was under the impression you where ripping me. My appologies!

Good work on your weight gain. I started out at about 155!
i'm in worcester.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 02:16:54 PM
i'm in worcester.

I see.... Know Tviggs
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: raziel on October 04, 2006, 02:18:35 PM
I see.... Know Tviggs
nah, i know of him.  shop on goldsatr blvd, cop and steroid thing right?
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 02:19:34 PM
nah, i know of him.  shop on goldsatr blvd, cop and steroid thing right?

Yah.. Used to be a good friend of mine. I myself am a natural so never got in to the juice thing. To bad he turned out that way.

Good luck with the training!
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Wiggs on October 04, 2006, 03:02:23 PM
Cutler's frontal lobe is starting to resemble Cormiers. ???
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: slayer on October 04, 2006, 04:44:08 PM
the king on backs! damm his traps could be a water botle holder!
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: chris_mason on October 04, 2006, 04:48:20 PM
Bottom line, Culter played the mass game and looked AWESOME!

Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: getfast81 on October 04, 2006, 04:50:14 PM
Ok I think I got it.  Ronnie lost because................. ....Jay beat him fair and square.  We dont need 500 Cutler pictures to prove it.  Cutler deserved to win absolutely but stop starting a thread dedicated to it when there is probably at least twenty more already. 
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: luv2build on October 04, 2006, 04:56:11 PM
the first picture of Jay looks just like all of the musclehead cartoons in the magazines.  Love it
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:16:57 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=99693.0;attach=107710;image)
sorry, I am unimpressed.

(http://www.thebiguniverse.com/coleman/cap096.jpg)
 8)

Jay looked good because Ronnie was way way off...

Put him next to Ronnie, Dorian, Flex, Haney, Bannout, Robby, Beckles etc etc. and his back becomes mediocre.

No disrerespect to Jay, but the truth is the truth.

Bodybuilding is not for sugar coating the truth.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 04, 2006, 05:24:44 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=99693.0;attach=107710;image)
sorry, I am unimpressed.

(http://www.thebiguniverse.com/coleman/cap096.jpg)
 8)

Jay looked good because Ronnie was way way off...

Put him next to Ronnie, Dorian, Flex, Haney, Bannout, Robby, Beckles etc etc. and his back becomes mediocre.

No disrerespect to Jay, but the truth is the truth.

Bodybuilding is not for sugar coating the truth.

Keep posting old pics lol that Ronnie didn't show up .
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:32:51 PM
oh come on ND, even you have to admit that Jay has never been known for his back.

His win has not changed that.

Sure, it was arguably better than ronnie's - but we all known that ronnie's back had the definition of a marshmellow at that contest.

Put Jay's back up against any number of other great backs...

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/bannout/sb202.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/bannout/sb201.jpg)
and it puts things into perspective.

Its one thing to congratulate Jay on his win

and is another thing to act as if his back is all of a sudden fantastic.

these are two different things.

that is all I am saying.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:36:16 PM
Yeah, way way off.  lol.

well, he was in some key poses.

His biceps and side chest were good, his back, arms (from the front), delts, quads, glutes and hams looked much softer than in 2005.

check out the pics 8)
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Matt C on October 04, 2006, 05:39:21 PM
Yep, definitely soft arms from the front.  ;D
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 04, 2006, 05:42:25 PM
oh come on ND, even you have to admit that Jay has never been known for his back.

His win has not changed that.

Sure, it was arguably better than ronnie's - but we all known that ronnie's back had the definition of a marshmellow at that contest.

Put Jay's back up against any number of other great backs...

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/bannout/sb202.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/bannout/sb201.jpg)
and it puts things into perspective.

Its one thing to congratulate Jay on his win

and is another thing to act as if his back is all of a sudden fantastic.

these are two different things.

that is all I am saying.


Jay's back is very good , wide as fuck , thick , good detail not great , it has improved by leaps & bounds , his back couldn't hold a candle to Yates or Ronnie at their prime , but Jay's back was better than Ronnies this contest and thats sounds very odd typing that .
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 05:42:44 PM
Ok....  Samir weighed like 200 lbs. It is not hard to have extreme detail at that bodyweight. Most all smaller great BB have amazing detail. Zane.. Samir... Ray... That argument is weak. jay holds up very well to Samir in this comparision and he has about 70 lbs more muscle on him. Shorter to boot. Not to mention you post a pic in black and white making the detail that much more dramatic. You are the king of shit like that.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 04, 2006, 05:53:31 PM
Ok....  Samir weighed like 200 lbs. It is not hard to have extreme detail at that bodyweight. Most all smaller great BB have amazing detail. Zane.. Samir... Ray... That argument is weak. jay holds up very well to Samir in this comparision and he has about 70 lbs more muscle on him. Shorter to boot. Not to mention you post a pic in black and white making the detail that much more dramatic. You are the king of shit like that.

Samir was 188lbs in that pic and still has a sick back !! but Jay's back is no longer a liability.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 05:56:50 PM
Samir was 188lbs in that pic and still has a sick back !! but Jay's back is no longer a liability.

That makes my point even more. Samir was like 188. Obv the guy is going to be absolutly shredded. So jay holds up well to a guy with about 90 lbs less muscle detail wise. He obv absolutly dwarfs him.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:57:23 PM
Quote
Not to mention you post a pic in black and white making the detail that much more dramatic. You are the king of shit like that.

ah, no. that would be ND.

there are very few black and white ronnie shots.
Title: Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
Post by: body88 on October 04, 2006, 06:12:51 PM
ah, no. that would be ND.

there are very few black and white ronnie shots.

What I meant was. You tend to post some pristine picture of Ronnie. Or of whoever you are arguing for. Then some crappy shot of the person being campared. Not a flame I agree with some of the things you say / post. Some I do not.