« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: This is why Ronnie lost The O  (Read 6482 times)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41311
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #25 on: October 04, 2006, 03:02:23 PM »
Cutler's frontal lobe is starting to resemble Cormiers. ???
Logged
7

slayer

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2736
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2006, 04:44:08 PM »
the king on backs! damm his traps could be a water botle holder!
Logged

chris_mason

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3216
  • Owner AtLarge Nutrition
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2006, 04:48:20 PM »
Bottom line, Culter played the mass game and looked AWESOME!

Logged
w

getfast81

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 959
  • Borat is for the weak................
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #28 on: October 04, 2006, 04:50:14 PM »
Ok I think I got it.  Ronnie lost because................. ....Jay beat him fair and square.  We dont need 500 Cutler pictures to prove it.  Cutler deserved to win absolutely but stop starting a thread dedicated to it when there is probably at least twenty more already. 
Logged
Truly STOP WHINING

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #29 on: October 04, 2006, 04:56:11 PM »
the first picture of Jay looks just like all of the musclehead cartoons in the magazines.  Love it
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #30 on: October 04, 2006, 05:16:57 PM »

sorry, I am unimpressed.


 8)

Jay looked good because Ronnie was way way off...

Put him next to Ronnie, Dorian, Flex, Haney, Bannout, Robby, Beckles etc etc. and his back becomes mediocre.

No disrerespect to Jay, but the truth is the truth.

Bodybuilding is not for sugar coating the truth.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83377
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #31 on: October 04, 2006, 05:24:44 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:16:57 PM

sorry, I am unimpressed.


 8)

Jay looked good because Ronnie was way way off...

Put him next to Ronnie, Dorian, Flex, Haney, Bannout, Robby, Beckles etc etc. and his back becomes mediocre.

No disrerespect to Jay, but the truth is the truth.

Bodybuilding is not for sugar coating the truth.

Keep posting old pics lol that Ronnie didn't show up .
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #32 on: October 04, 2006, 05:32:51 PM »
oh come on ND, even you have to admit that Jay has never been known for his back.

His win has not changed that.

Sure, it was arguably better than ronnie's - but we all known that ronnie's back had the definition of a marshmellow at that contest.

Put Jay's back up against any number of other great backs...



and it puts things into perspective.

Its one thing to congratulate Jay on his win

and is another thing to act as if his back is all of a sudden fantastic.

these are two different things.

that is all I am saying.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #33 on: October 04, 2006, 05:36:16 PM »
Quote from: Matt C on October 04, 2006, 05:30:14 PM
Yeah, way way off.  lol.

well, he was in some key poses.

His biceps and side chest were good, his back, arms (from the front), delts, quads, glutes and hams looked much softer than in 2005.

check out the pics 8)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #34 on: October 04, 2006, 05:39:21 PM »
Yep, definitely soft arms from the front.  ;D
Logged
Bodybuilding Pro.com

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83377
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #35 on: October 04, 2006, 05:42:25 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:32:51 PM
oh come on ND, even you have to admit that Jay has never been known for his back.

His win has not changed that.

Sure, it was arguably better than ronnie's - but we all known that ronnie's back had the definition of a marshmellow at that contest.

Put Jay's back up against any number of other great backs...



and it puts things into perspective.

Its one thing to congratulate Jay on his win

and is another thing to act as if his back is all of a sudden fantastic.

these are two different things.

that is all I am saying.


Jay's back is very good , wide as fuck , thick , good detail not great , it has improved by leaps & bounds , his back couldn't hold a candle to Yates or Ronnie at their prime , but Jay's back was better than Ronnies this contest and thats sounds very odd typing that .
Logged

body88

  • Guest
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #36 on: October 04, 2006, 05:42:44 PM »
Ok....  Samir weighed like 200 lbs. It is not hard to have extreme detail at that bodyweight. Most all smaller great BB have amazing detail. Zane.. Samir... Ray... That argument is weak. jay holds up very well to Samir in this comparision and he has about 70 lbs more muscle on him. Shorter to boot. Not to mention you post a pic in black and white making the detail that much more dramatic. You are the king of shit like that.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83377
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #37 on: October 04, 2006, 05:53:31 PM »
Quote from: body88 on October 04, 2006, 05:42:44 PM
Ok....  Samir weighed like 200 lbs. It is not hard to have extreme detail at that bodyweight. Most all smaller great BB have amazing detail. Zane.. Samir... Ray... That argument is weak. jay holds up very well to Samir in this comparision and he has about 70 lbs more muscle on him. Shorter to boot. Not to mention you post a pic in black and white making the detail that much more dramatic. You are the king of shit like that.

Samir was 188lbs in that pic and still has a sick back !! but Jay's back is no longer a liability.
Logged

body88

  • Guest
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #38 on: October 04, 2006, 05:56:50 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 04, 2006, 05:53:31 PM
Samir was 188lbs in that pic and still has a sick back !! but Jay's back is no longer a liability.

That makes my point even more. Samir was like 188. Obv the guy is going to be absolutly shredded. So jay holds up well to a guy with about 90 lbs less muscle detail wise. He obv absolutly dwarfs him.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #39 on: October 04, 2006, 05:57:23 PM »
Quote
Not to mention you post a pic in black and white making the detail that much more dramatic. You are the king of shit like that.

ah, no. that would be ND.

there are very few black and white ronnie shots.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

body88

  • Guest
Re: This is why Ronnie lost The O
« Reply #40 on: October 04, 2006, 06:12:51 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on October 04, 2006, 05:57:23 PM
ah, no. that would be ND.

there are very few black and white ronnie shots.

What I meant was. You tend to post some pristine picture of Ronnie. Or of whoever you are arguing for. Then some crappy shot of the person being campared. Not a flame I agree with some of the things you say / post. Some I do not.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »