Author Topic: Zane VS Putnam  (Read 4442 times)

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #25 on: October 24, 2009, 07:40:20 AM »
Zane was a total dream-boat (no homo)

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #26 on: October 24, 2009, 08:27:33 AM »
i wonder if arnold nailed zanes wife?

because lets face it - arnold gets what arnold wants  ;)
175lbs by 31st July

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #27 on: October 24, 2009, 10:42:49 AM »
reg park himself said that zane had the best physique in history

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #28 on: October 24, 2009, 04:03:52 PM »




Anyone who thinks Peter Putnam is a better bodybuilder than Frank Zane needs to get their eyes checked.  These two aren't even in the same league.  To quote Lee Labrada "The bodies have gotten bigger, they have not gotten better."

No I am not Frank Zane.



What did Zane's biceps measure? Arnold was once quoted as saying that without the steroids, Zane was a natural 130-140 pound guy.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31571
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #29 on: October 24, 2009, 04:30:15 PM »
putnam has  good build,good arms.legs,zane had a great build for his era,changed the way a bber should present himself on stage and his conditioning is still a benchmark today for a contest bber.

wordy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 625
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #30 on: October 24, 2009, 04:30:31 PM »

R U sure?



Thats not Rydian off 2007 X Factor!

jtsunami

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7067
  • I support Bigbobs
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #31 on: October 24, 2009, 04:37:04 PM »
What did Zane's biceps measure? Arnold was once quoted as saying that without the steroids, Zane was a natural 130-140 pound guy.

lol zane was a twink natural or not.
TEAM Nasser

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #32 on: October 24, 2009, 04:38:08 PM »
Putnam does not have a terrible physique, only a terrible back and hair style

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #33 on: October 24, 2009, 04:51:55 PM »
What did Zane's biceps measure? Arnold was once quoted as saying that without the steroids, Zane was a natural 130-140 pound guy.

so arnold was a natural 200lb guy then ?
tank u jesus

jtsunami

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7067
  • I support Bigbobs
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #34 on: October 24, 2009, 06:20:51 PM »
so arnold was a natural 200lb guy then ?

haha yeah right it's fuck in Arnold, he probably 215 or 220 natural.

TEAM Nasser

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 60018
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #35 on: October 24, 2009, 06:40:20 PM »
 ;D




garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Zane VS Putnam
« Reply #36 on: October 24, 2009, 06:50:07 PM »
G