Don't know, Flex had a smaller waist, bigger arms legs, had a better taper due to his small waist, which made his lats flare out in the front double bi giving the illusion of width. Flex was also more of a Freak. But that one pic of Flex in some white trunks lying down with one arm up , has to be hands the most aesthetic pic ever taken of a bodybuilder. Mits O. took it. I have posted it before.
Perfection not even Michelangelo would have been capable to portray. (no homo)
Who would win an aesthetic-off between Flex and Paris?
Great physique... perfection? no V-taper , calves are a bit funny (oil?).
here i am talking about ceratin facts that already happened and not what should have happened!!.. if we talk about what should have happened so let me add to what i said about nasser: 2x mr. olympia (96 and 97) also it was close in 98 between him and ronnie.. let me add NOC 94 where he was much better than francois.. let me add AC 97 and may be 98..
I think Paris was slightly more aesthetic. Better skeletal structure and proportions.
Michelangelo DID NOT HAVE SYNTHOL FO RBICEPS, TRICEPS, CALVES AND DELTS.THE BEEF
Cmon Bob Paris would get blown off the stage by Flex
all I said was I think Bob Paris was slightly more aesthetic than Flex Wheeler. I don't think Paris could take Wheeler in a bodybuilding contest.
And even Michelangelo would know that this pic is pre-synthol.
ROFL . . . Parker has spoken The Beef
