« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Lee Haney  (Read 11269 times)

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #50 on: January 28, 2010, 06:08:22 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 28, 2010, 05:56:03 PM
First and only

Yeah Haney looks way off there - but I think everyone was that Olympia
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83618
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #51 on: January 28, 2010, 06:18:28 PM »
Quote from: gcb on January 28, 2010, 06:08:22 PM
Yeah Haney looks way off there - but I think everyone was that Olympia

Labada and Christian were better than most
Logged

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #52 on: January 28, 2010, 06:27:52 PM »
no way they were natural - they would still have been using to some extent - I wonder what they used to bypass the drug testing
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83618
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #53 on: January 28, 2010, 06:33:54 PM »
Quote from: gcb on January 28, 2010, 06:27:52 PM
no way they were natural - they would still have been using to some extent - I wonder what they used to bypass the drug testing

They were off , way off from the previous year so I doubt they were on a precontest stack probably stopped with enough time to ' past ' the test but one thing is for sure they weren't business as usual.
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #54 on: January 28, 2010, 11:36:47 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 28, 2010, 05:28:45 PM
1990  :-\

still was better than labrada's back and the others on that day!..
Logged

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #55 on: January 28, 2010, 11:41:16 PM »
he certainly wasn't no nasser el sonbaty!
Logged
No doubt about it...

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #56 on: January 29, 2010, 12:08:55 AM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 28, 2010, 06:33:54 PM
They were off , way off from the previous year so I doubt they were on a precontest stack probably stopped with enough time to ' past ' the test but one thing is for sure they weren't business as usual.

Yep
Logged

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #57 on: January 29, 2010, 02:32:21 AM »
They weren't fucking off the drugs completely.  Some of you are clueless.  You know how fucking easy it was to pass drug tests, especially ones for steroids in the early 1990s?  Drug testing was a joke back then. 
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #58 on: January 29, 2010, 03:26:31 AM »
Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on January 29, 2010, 02:32:21 AM
They weren't fucking off the drugs completely.  Some of you are clueless.  You know how fucking easy it was to pass drug tests, especially ones for steroids in the early 1990s?  Drug testing was a joke back then. 

as far as i know it was not a drug FREE contest but there was a maximum accepted limit according to the test.. because i remember reading that in an interview after the contest with haney they mentioned that his test results were better than all the others!!.. so this clearly means it was not a totally drug free contest!..
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Lee Haney
« Reply #59 on: January 29, 2010, 04:28:43 AM »
Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on January 29, 2010, 03:26:31 AM
as far as i know it was not a drug FREE contest but there was a maximum accepted limit according to the test.. because i remember reading that in an interview after the contest with haney they mentioned that his test results were better than all the others!!.. so this clearly means it was not a totally drug free contest!..
X2 testing was a joke.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »