good to see that no time was wasted

[tonymctones]

Yep and their absence will speak volumes.

well see, I know you guys philosophy on modding but to me at times a sterner hand needs to be used.

[Hugo Chavez]

just to be clear, personal attacks are fine on political but not on the CT board?

threads started here in political for the sole purpose of personally attacking another usually always get deleted or moved to the Z so it's not ok here either.

[240 is Back]

can we have a yes/no on what is a CT now?

Obama intentionally trying to destroy economy?
Anything about a NWO/secret group?
Obama birth cert?
Any doubt at all, on legitimacy of UE or job loss numbers?

Are those automatic CT threads now?  yes or no

[tonymctones]

can we have a yes/no on what is a CT now?

Obama intentionally trying to destroy economy?
Anything about a NWO/secret group?
Obama birth cert?
Any doubt at all, on legitimacy of UE or job loss numbers?

Are those automatic CT threads now?  yes or no

LOL dont get all butt hurt now 240, you supposedly dont even like talking about 9/11 anymore...

[240 is Back]

LOL dont get all butt hurt now 240, you supposedly dont even like talking about 9/11 anymore...

my point is that we don't even have a clear def of what a CT is.

Just about every new story has an "alternative version", or a CT.


Bush lied about wmd = CT. It counters the official govt story.
Obama's birth cert = CT

Heck, most of what we debate here - nearly every single issue - has a side that COUNTERS THE OFFICIAL GOVT ACCOUNT OF EVENTS.

And I haven't heard a clear definition of what is Ct, what is not, from the mods yet.  hugo? Oz?  Please clarify?

[tonymctones]

my point is that we don't even have a clear def of what a CT is.

Just about every new story has an "alternative version", or a CT.


Bush lied about wmd = CT. It counters the official govt story.
Obama's birth cert = CT

Heck, most of what we debate here - nearly every single issue - has a side that COUNTERS THE OFFICIAL GOVT ACCOUNT OF EVENTS.

And I haven't heard a clear definition of what is Ct, what is not, from the mods yet.  hugo? Oz?  Please clarify?

lol we also dont have clear guidelines as to what constitutes political topics...but that didnt keep you from taking advantage with you avalanche of idiotic palin threads in the election did it?

but now you want a clear cookie cutter rules? lmao get over it...

[Hugo Chavez]

Heck, most of what we debate here - nearly every single issue - has a side that COUNTERS THE OFFICIAL GOVT ACCOUNT OF EVENTS.
And I haven't heard a clear definition of what is Ct, what is not, from the mods yet.  hugo? Oz?  Please clarify?

really no need to clarrify.  We have the same problem with religious topics here in political.  Sometimes it's really hard to judge exactly what point constitutes enough for it to be moved.  Then I have to bug stella to move it back when everyone freaks out about it being moved.  This is even less of a problem, since we have the same mods in both forums.  If people didn't want it moved, one of us will be able to fix that pretty fast.  I'm not going to move every thread that has the slightest hint of a theory.