Author Topic: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?  (Read 7024 times)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #50 on: June 10, 2012, 12:20:03 AM »
WTF??I turned the fight off after the 10th round and I had Manny up all 10 rounds, at absolute worst 9 rounds up, I come here assuming Manny won by at least 10 rounds, read the posts and assumed you were all being sarcastic as he won it so easily,and find out he fucking lost, are you kidding me?!!?!Biggest fix of any sport of all time!

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #51 on: June 10, 2012, 12:23:31 AM »
WTF??I turned the fight off after the 10th round and I had Manny up all 10 rounds, at absolute worst 9 rounds up, I come here assuming Manny won by at least 10 rounds, read the posts and assumed you were all being sarcastic as he won it so easily,and find out he fucking lost, are you kidding me?!!?!Biggest fix of any sport of all time!

It's certainly up there but I gotta disagree and say that Roy Jones Jr in the 88 Olympics was the poorest decision I ever witnessed.

maxkane69

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
  • PALUMBOISM DESTROYED BODYBUILDING!
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #52 on: June 10, 2012, 12:38:27 AM »

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #53 on: June 10, 2012, 12:59:40 AM »
boxing is dead

the money always talks
T

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18775
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #54 on: June 10, 2012, 01:05:06 AM »
Don't worry GH15 is already on the phone with the judges to overturn the ruling and have pacquiao retain his belt 8)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #55 on: June 10, 2012, 01:11:14 AM »
lol, even Arum thinks its a fix


"Can you believe that?" promoter Bob Arum said. "I had it 10-2! After I got into the ring after the fight, I went over to Bradley and said 'You did very well.' He said, 'I tried hard, but I couldn't beat the guy.' This is crazy. You talk about killing boxing? All three scorecards you throw out."

"This is a death knell for boxing, and I'm going to make a ton of money on the rematch," Arum said.

Bam-bam

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4501
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #56 on: June 10, 2012, 11:11:23 AM »
assbruise

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #57 on: June 10, 2012, 04:46:49 PM »
Congress goes after baseball but doesn't touch the NBA and Boxing. People should look into the connections between sports gambling and politicians/family.

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36458
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #58 on: June 10, 2012, 06:40:41 PM »
great white southern heritage rules over the yung african americans fighting to the death!
A

james72766

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #59 on: June 10, 2012, 07:19:42 PM »
There was a boxing/gambling reporter from Vegas on ESPN Radio this morning. He had the most realistic reason I've heard as to why this fight could have been fixed.

It all boils down with Arum making almost as much money from a Paq vs. Bradley rematch compared to a Paq vs. Mayweather fight, but without nearly as much at risk.

Since Arum promotes both Paq and Bradley, even though the gate will be much smaller, since he gets a cut of both and controls everything, he still stands to make a ton. Plus, regardless of the outcome, Arum still has the champion.

With Mayweather, Mayweather would control half of the promotions and, of course, Arum gets nothing from Mayweather other than headaches during contract negotiations. And of course, if Paq loses to Mayweather, there goes Arum's meal ticket.

Seems to make sense. In a scenario like this, I would imagine Paq was in on it. He didn't look like he was going for the kill. Even Max Kellerman, during the fight, said he sensed Paq had more in him and would have fought tougher if Bradley was providing a tougher fight. And Paq didn't look the least bit angered about the decision after the fight. Took it a bit too calm. Went a little overboard with his whole "I respect the decision of the judges" spiel as well I think.

He'll get a nice payday with a Bradley rematch. The reporter on ESPN said that the Vegas books will have Paq as a higher favorite than he was this fight due to the way he dominated.

asbrus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #60 on: June 10, 2012, 07:40:00 PM »
There was a boxing/gambling reporter from Vegas on ESPN Radio this morning. He had the most realistic reason I've heard as to why this fight could have been fixed.

It all boils down with Arum making almost as much money from a Paq vs. Bradley rematch compared to a Paq vs. Mayweather fight, but without nearly as much at risk.

Since Arum promotes both Paq and Bradley, even though the gate will be much smaller, since he gets a cut of both and controls everything, he still stands to make a ton. Plus, regardless of the outcome, Arum still has the champion.

With Mayweather, Mayweather would control half of the promotions and, of course, Arum gets nothing from Mayweather other than headaches during contract negotiations. And of course, if Paq loses to Mayweather, there goes Arum's meal ticket.

Seems to make sense. In a scenario like this, I would imagine Paq was in on it. He didn't look like he was going for the kill. Even Max Kellerman, during the fight, said he sensed Paq had more in him and would have fought tougher if Bradley was providing a tougher fight. And Paq didn't look the least bit angered about the decision after the fight. Took it a bit too calm. Went a little overboard with his whole "I respect the decision of the judges" spiel as well I think.

He'll get a nice payday with a Bradley rematch. The reporter on ESPN said that the Vegas books will have Paq as a higher favorite than he was this fight due to the way he dominated.

WHY W0ULD PAC BE IN 0N IT?

james72766

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #61 on: June 10, 2012, 07:54:14 PM »
A couple of reasons, there are rumors Paq owes Arum a ton of money. Arum may just control him.

Also, if Paq was holding back this fight, he would get an extra payday for the rematch against someone he knows he can beat, as opposed to being tested by Mayweather. To me, it just looked like Paq wasn't going all out, especially the few times he had him hurt. Looked like he was holding back.

Also, after obviously winning the fight, wouldn't you think he'd be more pissed about the decision? Paq was just too calm. Something doesn't add up.

Just my two cents.

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8835
  • .......
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #62 on: June 11, 2012, 02:05:06 AM »
In pro bodybuilding:

 1. Apartheid + Joe Weider + Arnold = 2nd place for Serge Nubret at 1975 IFBB Mr.Olympia
 2. 1980 Ifbb Mr.Olympia
 3. 1981 Ifbb Mr.Olympia

So you saying Serge Nubret got gifted the second place?

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #63 on: June 11, 2012, 04:15:21 AM »
The Montreal Screwjob

James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #64 on: June 11, 2012, 04:21:15 AM »
They do it because they evoke passion from you lot. They know you'll also pay for the next fight. The next fix. Stop watching it. Stop discussing it.
*

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8835
  • .......
Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
« Reply #65 on: June 11, 2012, 07:18:48 AM »