Seems hes fucked off for a while.
Guys argument seems to be that he can justify spending ludicrous amounts of money on bullshit supplements to look slightly better than natty but he has a problem with someone having a shot of test a week to look ten times better than a natty.
His argument then proceeds to make the assumption that when you stop having that shot a week you look worse then when you started taking the gear.
My point is, so fucking what?
We all look good for a period of time, then we lose it, its called reality.
So you have a choice, its spend thousands of dollars on useless supps and look 5% better, or have a shot a week at around £3 and look 50% better.
You then both stop what you were doing and you both regress back to where you started.
I think thats his point.