« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Lawler vs. Woodley  (Read 2302 times)

Slapper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4305
  • Vincit qui se vincit
Lawler vs. Woodley
« on: July 31, 2016, 07:09:19 AM »
Talk about a sitting duck.

Did Lawler even train for this fight? He didn't even throw a punch.
Logged

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2016, 07:27:47 AM »
word is woodley toys with him in training

ragging him around

he got caught in the headlights
Logged
T

Slapper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4305
  • Vincit qui se vincit
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2016, 07:39:12 AM »
Quote from: bigmc on July 31, 2016, 07:27:47 AM
word is woodley toys with him in training

ragging him around

he got caught in the headlights

You can tell that it was a matter of time because Woodley kept on keeping the distance and Lawler didn't even try to close the gap or mount some sort of attack.

I've seen hundreds of fights, and even though I'm not an expert... I reckon fighting people like Woodley isn't that complicated: The guy has only but ONE goal, to knock you out in the first round. That's his only goal. This is extremely valuable information, meaning, the other fighter can mount a defensive fight in the first and second rounds and then... SURPRISE! Attack.

All these fighter that fight people like Tyron come out looking scared like chicken shit. Work the body, work the torso, move to the right all the time, et cetera. It's really not that fucking difficult.

Am I the only one who sees it this way? Robbie lost the fight before he even stepped in the octagon.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83658
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2016, 07:52:47 AM »
Logged

Europe

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1976
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2016, 08:14:32 AM »
I was suprised that Lawler didn't took a different approach. Did he think that 'terminator/zombie' style was going to work for everybody?

That's why you have gameplans, I think Nick Diaz in a rematch would've tool Lawler like he did last time.
Logged

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2016, 08:24:45 AM »
Quote from: Europe on July 31, 2016, 08:14:32 AM
I was suprised that Lawler didn't took a different approach. Did he think that 'terminator/zombie' style was going to work for everybody?

That's why you have gameplans, I think Nick Diaz in a rematch would've tool Lawler like he did last time.


robbie is a slow starter

he is a demon in the fourth and fifth rounds

thats where he wins his fights

Logged
T

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17466
  • MAGA
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2016, 08:37:35 AM »
u telling me Woodley is passing drugtests?
Logged

Chadwick The Beta

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4334
  • "Stop calling me by my name."
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2016, 10:51:22 AM »

Strange matchup.





Logged
K

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42550
  • Getbig!
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2016, 11:49:31 AM »
Quote from: Chadwick The Beta on July 31, 2016, 10:51:22 AM
Strange matchup.






we think alike that was my first thought when i saw the title of this thread.. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged
F

honest

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3376
Re: Lawler vs. Woodley
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2016, 04:57:21 PM »
Woodleys is tailor made for Condit in a rematch where is knee doesn't go again or anyone who can take a punch with good cardio, Robbie should have kept his distance and boxed for the first two rounds like hes done previously then he could have just picked him off, I don't think Woodley is a good champion, I even think Lawler beats him in a rematch.  Thompson will get the fight but Condit should be pushing his position forward, was very unlucky to lose to Lawler, I had him edging their fight 3 rounds to 2
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »