SF why you defending that professor so hard they should fire that guy.
Fallacious logic. Where did I defend the professor? Defending university policy about recording has ZERO to do with whether or not I agree with the professor. If the student broke university policy then he/she deserves to be held responsible for his/her action, independent of what the professor spoke about. I know many professors who NEVER speak about politics or religion and still don't want their lectures recorded, even when they stick exactly to course content. Again, if there was explicit policies about recording lectures, and the student disobeyed such policies, then he/she needs to be held accountable. Personal responsibility, right?
So, I don't see where I was defending the professor.
Maybe you can point that out.
Enlighten me. What I did say was that in terms of a LAWSUIT, the professor can always lie and say the course was about the intersection between politics and human sexuality, in order to justify her case. However, that could easily be proven wrong by just viewing the syllabus of that day, which I explicitly stated.
