Author Topic: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question  (Read 8759 times)

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9486
  • .......
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #50 on: January 30, 2017, 09:54:23 AM »
Ronnie had freakier biceps, Sergio had fuller lateral and long head of the triceps. But, he was injured in one of them (correct?) hence the one looking kinda shortened.

Tore his left triceps in an accident.

Also had quite bad arthritis in his elbows and knees, which apparently reduced range of motion and why he used half reps for bench. Squatting also became more difficult and that's one reason why his legs were smaller in the 80's. He later had to have several joint replacements.

He liked test and winstrol, which probably contributed to this as they would dry out his joints.


Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #51 on: January 30, 2017, 01:05:41 PM »
Ronnie coleman 2003 is the greatest combination of size and condition to ever grace a bodybuilding stage and that is what made ronnie the greatest of all time.



2000 is better. Waist was still relatively tight, especially compared to '03.

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #52 on: January 30, 2017, 03:46:52 PM »
2003 ronnie was an abomination

that was when i finally thought to myself for the first time the sport as i always loved it is now gone

E
E

light weight baby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #53 on: January 30, 2017, 03:47:37 PM »
2003 ronnie was an abomination

that was when i finally thought to myself for the first time the sport as i always loved it is now gone

E
fuck off bob paris twink lover

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #54 on: January 30, 2017, 03:50:32 PM »
fuck off bob paris twink lover

fuck off bloated blob lover

E
E

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #55 on: January 30, 2017, 03:51:27 PM »
2000 is better. Waist was still relatively tight, especially compared to '03.

2000 ronnie was awesome, underrated

03 absolutely sucked

E
E

light weight baby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #56 on: January 30, 2017, 03:54:52 PM »
fuck off bloated blob lover

E
why the fuck do you sign your posts with

E

when you already have a signature saying

E

and what is the need for it even when your username is right next to your post

you must have some sort of epic megalomania

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #57 on: January 30, 2017, 03:55:56 PM »
why the fuck do you sign your posts with

E

when you already have a signature saying

E

and what is the need for it even when your username is right next to your post

you must have some sort of epic megalomania

because i want to

E
E

light weight baby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #58 on: January 30, 2017, 03:58:12 PM »
because i want to

E
well obviously you stupid cock sucker

the question remains, why would a person want that?

complete loser with severe delusions of importance, that's also why you moan about "how ronnie destroyed the sport YOU loved"

you are nothing


Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #59 on: January 30, 2017, 04:00:58 PM »
well obviously you stupid cock sucker

the question remains, why would a person want that?

complete loser with severe delusions of importance, that's also why you moan about "how ronnie destroyed the sport YOU loved"

you are nothing





E
E

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #60 on: January 30, 2017, 07:30:44 PM »
Jay has become cocky after his retirement.


Really? He just said that he considers Dex one of the top TWO bbers of all time and that he (Jay) isn't one of them.

That's a far cry from him saying previously that he was the greatest ever.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #61 on: January 30, 2017, 07:32:47 PM »
And if Sergio was using the same drugs?

He was mainly using test and winstrol, according to him his favourites.

Oh brother, here we go.

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9486
  • .......
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #62 on: January 31, 2017, 05:24:08 AM »
Oh brother, here we go.

There were some comparison pictures posted earlier.

I still think Sergio had better structure and balance, especially with his very narrow waist.

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12264
  • Getbig!
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #63 on: January 31, 2017, 01:11:47 PM »

Either scenario, Ronnie wins.... based on Sergio weak rear double bicep pose. Also, Ronnie has more cuts & striations

No a fair comparison.... that was 45 damn years ago !!  Sergio was eating 3 times a day (not watching carbs)  playing pool, domino, pocker,  drinking beer and salsa dancing at night lol !!!!!!!  

Ronnie would have had 13 inch calves, a beer gut and not a single striation under Sergio's drugs and food regimen .



WoooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32202
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #64 on: February 01, 2017, 06:47:09 AM »
No a fair comparison.... that was 45 damn years ago !!  Sergio was eating 3 times a day (not watching carbs)  playing pool, domino, pocker,  drinking beer and salsa dancing at night lol !!!!!!!  

Ronnie would have had 13 inch calves, a beer gut and not a single striation under Sergio's drugs and food regimen .



WoooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
how would this version Sergio have done against haney

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33365
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #65 on: February 01, 2017, 06:49:38 AM »
how would this version Sergio have done against haney

Haney would crush Sergio.... because Sergio was soft. Haney got pretty damn ripped. But Colemen was leaner than both.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83985
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #66 on: February 01, 2017, 09:19:36 AM »
Haney would DID crush Sergio.... because Sergio was soft. Haney got pretty damn ripped. But Colemen was leaner than both.

However Sergio by that time really wasn't Sergio

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32202
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #67 on: February 01, 2017, 09:41:43 AM »
However Sergio by that time really wasn't Sergio
OF COURSE SERGIO 80'S COMEBACK WAS EASY ,I'M TALKING THE BW PICS HERE,,I KNOW HANEY REAR DB POSE ARMS ASIDE WAS BETTER ,BUT CHEST /DELTS,WAIST WAS SIMILAR,,AND SERGIOS LEGS WERE FULLER

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #68 on: February 01, 2017, 11:12:30 AM »
When did Jay become so honest?

light weight baby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #69 on: February 01, 2017, 09:16:20 PM »
When did Jay become so honest?
he has been for a few yrs already as far as i know

like that video where he makes fun of his own t shirt slogan

TO BE A LEGEND YOU HAVE TO TRAIN LIKE ONE

Then he says

TO BE A LEGEND YOU HAVE TO TAKE WHAT A LEGEND TAKES


Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #70 on: February 01, 2017, 11:52:34 PM »
What the hell is wrong with Phil's chest? Horrible, just horrible. Looks like a torn right chest.



Looks like a torn right and left pec and don't get me started on those abs (or lack there of).  :-X

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #71 on: February 01, 2017, 11:55:45 PM »
Case closed

00:55



All bodybuilders lie about their heights also, but as honest as Jay is, I don't think he would admit to that seeing he's also guilty of it.

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19344
  • Buc ee’s is numero uno
Re: Cutler settles the hypothetical "Prime Ronnie VS Prime Phil" question
« Reply #72 on: February 02, 2017, 05:07:49 AM »
No a fair comparison.... that was 45 damn years ago !!  Sergio was eating 3 times a day (not watching carbs)  playing pool, domino, pocker,  drinking beer and salsa dancing at night lol !!!!!!!  

Ronnie would have had 13 inch calves, a beer gut and not a single striation under Sergio's drugs and food regimen .



WoooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

I don't know if that's believable, like jay said all bbers lie....