« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 64=65??  (Read 1264 times)

blinky

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12930
64=65??
« on: December 11, 2006, 01:47:21 PM »
found this and thought it was interesting


anybody have an explanation....im no math wizard

Logged
4

Migs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14487
  • THERE WAS A FIRE FIGHT!!!!
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2006, 03:04:57 PM »
It actually doesn't equal 65.  If you rearrange the triangles you get a parallelogram.  when you actually put it together there is a gap between the triangles with an area of 1.  this deviation is the cause for the 65. 
Logged

body88

  • Guest
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2006, 03:06:47 PM »
Quote from: blinky on December 11, 2006, 01:47:21 PM
found this and thought it was interesting


anybody have an explanation....im no math wizard



Blinky, do you have a link to the video from your avatar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??
Logged

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2006, 05:49:16 PM »
Logged

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2006, 05:50:19 PM »
8x8=64....5x13=65

8x8=64....plus the one giant square that holds all of the squares, total 65.
Logged

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2006, 07:30:44 PM »
i discovered this during math time in elementary school and it blew my mind.
Logged

blinky

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12930
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2006, 12:00:36 AM »
Quote from: Migs on December 11, 2006, 03:04:57 PM
It actually doesn't equal 65.  If you rearrange the triangles you get a parallelogram.  when you actually put it together there is a gap between the triangles with an area of 1.  this deviation is the cause for the 65. 

i dont see a gap
Logged
4

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2006, 12:14:46 AM »
Quote from: blinky on December 12, 2006, 12:00:36 AM
i dont see a gap


nice lil tight gap on those tittays in your avatar.
Logged

blinky

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12930
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2006, 01:31:36 AM »
Quote from: 240 is Back on December 12, 2006, 12:14:46 AM

nice lil tight gap on those tittays in your avatar.


 ;D
lol
Logged
4

Migs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14487
  • THERE WAS A FIRE FIGHT!!!!
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2006, 07:15:08 AM »
the gap lies in the borders inside the parralelagram.  If you actually redraw ti or better make cut out and rearrange them there is a gap.  The illusion works becuase the fact that the lineed interior borders are in place and hide the gap.  It can be disproven mathematicaly
Logged

sandycoosworth

  • Guest
Re: 64=65??
« Reply #10 on: December 12, 2006, 07:23:06 AM »
at the very top of the second rectangle former(the 65 one) you can see its missing a couple of pixels (ie the right side corner is higher than hte left side corner) ... this is where the missing 1 went
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »