Author Topic: 70's build. What was so complicated?  (Read 18518 times)

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #125 on: February 15, 2008, 04:06:37 PM »
eh. 

all i know is that 200 mg of test of any ester is equal to 200 mg of test of any other ester...because the ester is just the release time.

i dont know anything abotu all that ester weight non sense...we arent talking about waxy maize and shit; so i dont know what the fuck he means....shit...im eating my ass off an growing big as fuck..leave me alone..   test is test...and ill kick some ass 
let's see a new picture.

thelamefalsehood

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
  • I love lamp
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #126 on: February 15, 2008, 05:08:57 PM »
eh. 

all i know is that 200 mg of test of any ester is equal to 200 mg of test of any other ester...because the ester is just the release time.

i dont know anything abotu all that ester weight non sense...we arent talking about waxy maize and shit; so i dont know what the fuck he means....shit...im eating my ass off an growing big as fuck..leave me alone..   test is test...and ill kick some ass 

You have zero clue on this one. Test is test, BUT use 600mg of prop and use 600mg of cypionate, you will feal FAR more from the prop, thats for sure. I've used 600 of each at different times, Testex Elmu and Virormones, top of the line test IMO, and while they were both strong, the Virormones felt much stronger. Much less bloat and you look and feal better.

candidate2025

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3281
  • chillin out relaxing
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #127 on: February 15, 2008, 05:15:36 PM »
You have zero clue on this one. Test is test, BUT use 600mg of prop and use 600mg of cypionate, you will feal FAR more from the prop, thats for sure. I've used 600 of each at different times, Testex Elmu and Virormones, top of the line test IMO, and while they were both strong, the Virormones felt much stronger. Much less bloat and you look and feal better.
thats because with the prop you have 600 mg being released over the span of two-three days, and with the cypionate its being released over a much longer period of time.   still the same amount of test though
d[-_-]b actin all cool

thelamefalsehood

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
  • I love lamp
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #128 on: February 15, 2008, 05:28:37 PM »
thats because with the prop you have 600 mg being released over the span of two-three days, and with the cypionate its being released over a much longer period of time.   still the same amount of test though

AHH, I should have mentioned because I figured everyone would have figure that part out. This was all well into the cycle, 5-6 weeks, not 5-6 days, both tests had plenty of time to float around and circulate in the system. Granted you always feal prop first, but the cyp had time to build up. I still say you feal prop more, mg for mg.

Red Hook

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4403
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #129 on: February 15, 2008, 05:37:14 PM »
This is why I love getbig...the real uncut truth..


lately we have been getting off track with "team" this and "team" that..

Disgusted, great thread..probably should be a sticky


also more Pros should post in this thread..notice how Chick or Milos hasn't posted
I

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #130 on: February 15, 2008, 05:45:44 PM »
Injection frequency has a lot to do with steady blood levels when it comes to all the different esters. Best to go twice weekly with something like cyp.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31565
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #131 on: February 15, 2008, 07:29:55 PM »
I used to talk to Vic years ago and he was a big fan of high dose anabolics, var, eq ect He did not like test, but he has mentioned in print that he liked tren so guess no harm in mentioning. Also, I know of one other very famous retired bb who recently is making a comeback (sory no names on this one) who hated test. Loved winny though. He had the "ideal" physique to many.
dennis newman.a guess but i could see the sides he didn't want ,but i think gh was his choice.

AllDrugs

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 270
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #132 on: February 15, 2008, 08:00:56 PM »
"BUT IM TELLING YOU HERE THAT NO AMATUER NOR PROFESSIONAL WALK AROUND AT 200LB 210LB 220 LB 250 LB 260 LB WITH OUT THE CONSISTANT USE AND REPEATED USE OF HORMONES"

Nope, just the one's with average to crappy genetics that don't train efficiently.

alejandro_torres

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #133 on: February 16, 2008, 07:37:42 AM »
gh

what do you mean by not eating well while being a teen?

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #134 on: February 16, 2008, 10:18:47 AM »
Hard to know for sure, alot of it seems to be revisionist history propogated by groupies like this guy. Check the Pumping Iron footage and finally take notice that it's guys like Corney and Ferrigno that were training hard and providing most of the inspiring footage, not Schwarzenegger.

Revisionist?  Don't know about that.  You can't base Arnold's training habits on a few reels of footage from a psuedo-documentary where he was hogging for the camera and trying to be clever.  Just ask his friends, and the people that were there during the time----most of them say the same thing, that nobody trained harder than Arnold.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #135 on: February 16, 2008, 10:31:40 AM »
Revisionist?  Don't know about that.  You can't base Arnold's training habits on a few reels of footage from a psuedo-documentary where he was hogging for the camera and trying to be clever.  Just ask his friends, and the people that were there during the time----most of them say the same thing, that nobody trained harder than Arnold.

They say that, but the most tangible evidence the footage says something else, and it was quite frankly inexcusable. If he truly trained as hard as claimed he'd have had no hesitation to do so; that he didn't makes it yet another unsubstantiated Arnold factoid.

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #136 on: February 16, 2008, 10:37:49 AM »
Common sense. Right there in the footage, vs. your hearsay. No viable explanation, and disappointing given all the rhetoric that many like you believe without substantiation.

I think you mean heresay.

It's not rhetoric when it's been said in countless interviews.....just do your homework.  Ken Waller, Ed Corney, Frank Zane, Dave Draper, Reg Park, Franco Columbo, etc....., they've all vouched for his intensity in the gym.  If you don't belive them, take it up with them.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #137 on: February 16, 2008, 10:45:08 AM »
I think you mean heresay.

It's not rhetoric when it's been said in countless interviews.....just do your homework.  Ken Waller, Ed Corney, Frank Zane, Dave Draper, Reg Park, Franco Columbo, etc....., they've all vouched for his intensity in the gym.  If you don't belive them, take it up with them.

No, the word's hearsay.

Unfortunately the tangible evidence is right there, despite your need to believe otherwise and reliance on anecdotes in order to maintain your reverence. Also ask yourself why they edited out the end of his squat set, and focused on Corney's.  ;D

Come back down to earth you'll recover. The homework was concluded long ago. ;D

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #138 on: February 16, 2008, 10:50:37 AM »
No, the word's hearsay.

Unfortunately the tangible evidence is right there, despite your need to believe otherwise and reliance on anecdotes in order to maintain your reverence. Also ask yourself why they edited out the end of his squat set, and focused on Corney's.  ;D

Come back down to earth you'll recover. The homework was concluded long ago. ;D

Whatever, you're wrong, but ok.

I refuse to argue with a guy nearing 15,000 posts.

I think your the one that needs to come back down to earth, son.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #139 on: February 16, 2008, 10:53:19 AM »
Whatever, you're wrong, but ok.

I refuse to argue with a guy nearing 15,000 posts.

I think your the one that needs to come back down to earth, son.

The evidence backs me. All you've got is air and a need to attack me in lieu of substance. Come up with something more solid or STFU deal with it and your fallen hero lol you still haven't explained the edited sequence i mentioned.

BTW learn to spell it's hearsay bwahahaahahahahaha

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #140 on: February 16, 2008, 10:54:12 AM »
Revisionist?  Don't know about that.  You can't base Arnold's training habits on a few reels of footage from a psuedo-documentary where he was hogging for the camera and trying to be clever.  Just ask his friends, and the people that were there during the time----most of them say the same thing, that nobody trained harder than Arnold.
I know someone who trained with those guys, and he tells me Arnold was very focused during training, but Robbie Robinson was crazy. He'd train with a 100+ degree fever...whatever it took Robbie did not miss workouts.
!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #141 on: February 16, 2008, 10:58:15 AM »
Robbie Robinson was crazy. He'd train with a 100+ degree fever...whatever it took Robbie did not miss workouts.

I can believe that, especially there's no solid evidence disproving it as there is with Arnold the BSer.

It's remarkable how only the very top names get credit, not others like Robinson. Just goes to show what self-promotion can do, as proven by this idiot's reliance in hearsay over substance.

SirTraps

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1603
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #142 on: February 16, 2008, 11:00:32 AM »
says the 98 pound rican bottom twink  ::) 

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #143 on: February 16, 2008, 11:04:58 AM »
says the 98 pound rican bottom twink  ::) 
Is this a reference to moi, "Sir Traps"? How's your boy Squadfather's sperm tasting these days? Garlicky?
!

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #144 on: February 16, 2008, 11:10:37 AM »
The evidence backs me. All you've got is air and a need to attack me in lieu of substance. Come up with something more solid or STFU deal with it and your fallen hero lol you still haven't explained the edited sequence i mentioned.

BTW learn to spell it's hearsay bwahahaahahahahaha

I'm at work right now, I don't have the time to go looking for articles, but I promise you, the evidence is there in my favor.  I will post it as soon as I can.  Have a rebuttal ready, fool.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #145 on: February 16, 2008, 11:11:45 AM »
I'm at work right now, I don't have the time to go looking for articles, but I promise you, the evidence is there in my favor.  I will post it as soon as I can.  Have a rebuttal ready, fool.
lol you have nothing but some kinda promise that you know. No substance just crap. And learn how to spell too.

After work go and bow down some more in front of soiled posters of your hero.


Hope this helps

DVSGOD

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 610
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #146 on: February 16, 2008, 02:31:15 PM »
Arnold used to burn out his training partners  ;D

Paul Allen

  • Guest
Re: 70's build. What was so complicated?
« Reply #147 on: February 16, 2008, 02:45:02 PM »
candizzle, you're really getting annoying with your "knowledge". how about this, you don't give out steroid info/advice until you've done a cycle, ok?