You know nothing about questioning, about law, nor did I write anything preposterous, I was going off of experience and knowledge i have gained...You need to get out more...your narrow minded view of things shows thru every post you make. Especially the post you made saying that mulatto children's intelligence is between that of black and white.
Your are a hybrid of a village idiot and xenophobic ignoramus, who prentends that he is intelligent, just to mask his own insecuries of his lack defining himself. Keep pretending, and your world may come crumbling down on you in a very spectacular way.
This thread = a discussion of statistical tendencies.
Your personal "experience" = not relevant because you could never attain enough experience and rational analysis skills to do something with this experience to rival the validity of the sources MattZi = refering to in hundreds of lifetimes.
Mazi = just refering to scientific research, and the findings are just what they are: findings. It Scientific rigour certainly blasts away your "experience" in a heartbeat.
The mulatto IQ thing is found in studies. If you want to question the validity of his claims about this stuff, then attack the studies he bases his opinion on directly with legit data instead of dismising the entire argument because you just "think it's wrong".
If you lived somewhere where people are retarded by western standards
like SOmalia, then you could always dismiss the claim that 2+2=4 because you had no concept of numbers , but it would still make you an idiot, and you'd still be wrong. You are doing something similar here.
Refering to statistical tendencies that are found among many contexts = being "broad minded". REfering to "personal experience" which is certainly context related and colored by your personality attributes = being incredibly narrow minded. It's comparable to doing a research study on a population and blindly picking out 0,001% of them, creating a personal opinion on that micro-group and then claiming that people who argues baed upon data that represents tendencies seen in the entire population as "narrow minded".
Do you see the somewhat questionable contents of your argumentation goofy?
