Author Topic: Bush's redemption  (Read 3863 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #50 on: August 27, 2013, 09:40:26 AM »
perfect example of why I'm not interested in anything you have to say

maybe Ron can start a "padded room" board for you



Obama and Kerry are lying us into a war and the liberal cult of psychosis is perfectly fine w it

bears

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2195
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #51 on: August 27, 2013, 09:41:51 AM »
Wild guess.....I ended up on Bagdad Airport in 2003...where were you? Atleast my rumors are based on what we saw and heard. Plus thats what boards like this are for.



the fact that you're a soldier doesn't make my statement any less true.  i know plenty of soldiers.  in fact i lift with one every week.  so i don't know much but i do know that you're guessing.


bears

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2195
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #52 on: August 27, 2013, 12:31:16 PM »
and i do remember all my liberal friends saying that Syria was next on GWB's list because of their oil.  But now none of them remember saying that.  so weird.

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #53 on: August 27, 2013, 01:43:17 PM »
Straw man would literally suck obamas penis

And yea the liberals are silent as a mouse now. Fucking hypocrites

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #54 on: August 27, 2013, 02:07:32 PM »
Straw man would literally suck obamas penis

And yea the liberals are silent as a mouse now. Fucking hypocrites

you're the one that brought it up so it sounds more like your fantasy

and assuming you're a Repub, that would just make it even more likely

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #55 on: August 27, 2013, 02:20:14 PM »
the fact that you're a soldier doesn't make my statement any less true.  i know plenty of soldiers.  in fact i lift with one every week.  so i don't know much but i do know that you're guessing.



I'm not "guessing"......I'm stating what we heard and what many saw. A guess would be that they're on the moon. If anything its an educated guess based on the fact that on the 5th of April 2003 my ass was parked on Bagdad Airport, black on ammo and fuel wondering where the nukes where. We heard day bafter day that they were either finding shit or that the Marines were chasing convoys into syria...that and the fact that Saddam had a history of hiding his shit with folks who he wasn't the best of friends with leads me to believe that whatever chem capacity he had ended up in Syria with former Iraqi army generals. Call it an educated guess if that makes u happy....
L

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #56 on: August 27, 2013, 02:27:31 PM »
I'm not "guessing"......I'm stating what we heard and what many saw. A guess would be that they're on the moon. If anything its an educated guess based on the fact that on the 5th of April 2003 my ass was parked on Bagdad Airport, black on ammo and fuel wondering where the nukes where. We heard day bafter day that they were either finding shit or that the Marines were chasing convoys into syria...that and the fact that Saddam had a history of hiding his shit with folks who he wasn't the best of friends with leads me to believe that whatever chem capacity he had ended up in Syria with former Iraqi army generals. Call it an educated guess if that makes u happy....

You are guessing. 

You don't know what was in those convoys, how many vehicles, when, who etc.

Did anyone see WMD's on these convoys?

Was there any pics taken of WMD's?

Its an assumption based on little evidence, fueled by the need to justify the invasion and catapulted by the Army rumor machine.  But NOT an educated guess.  An educated guess would have some evidence; even a little to go from.  You have nothing but conjecture based solely on circumstance with out actual evidence.


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #57 on: August 27, 2013, 03:58:01 PM »
I'm not "guessing"......I'm stating what we heard and what many saw. A guess would be that they're on the moon. If anything its an educated guess based on the fact that on the 5th of April 2003 my ass was parked on Bagdad Airport, black on ammo and fuel wondering where the nukes where. We heard day bafter day that they were either finding shit or that the Marines were chasing convoys into syria...that and the fact that Saddam had a history of hiding his shit with folks who he wasn't the best of friends with leads me to believe that whatever chem capacity he had ended up in Syria with former Iraqi army generals. Call it an educated guess if that makes u happy....

yet none of that made it back to a White House which was desperate for any little thing they could hang their hat on to justify the invasion (both prior and during the ongoing occupation)

Again, after being captured Hussein admitted he had no WMD's and lamented not having permitted the United Nations to witness the destruction of Iraq's weapons stockpile after the 1991 Persian Gulf War

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #58 on: August 27, 2013, 04:39:11 PM »
We're derailing the thread but I'll say this. They found shit...stuff that would help make the case...chem alarms went off..the DOE teams recovered crap and none of it was ever mentioned and I have no clue why.
L

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #59 on: August 27, 2013, 04:41:06 PM »
We're derailing the thread but I'll say this. They found shit...stuff that would help make the case...chem alarms went off..the DOE teams recovered crap and none of it was ever mentioned and I have no clue why.

That doesn't make sense.  Why during the BUSH's big move, would evidence of Chems be suppressed?????

bears

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2195
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #60 on: August 28, 2013, 07:19:51 AM »
That doesn't make sense.  Why during the BUSH's big move, would evidence of Chems be suppressed?????

maybe not suppressed but just not reported on because no iron clad evidence.  so now we invaded Iraq and also want to invade Syria.  the "war for oil" accusations would have run rampant.  because now GWB is starting a war with Syria and you know...he's from oil.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Bush's redemption
« Reply #61 on: August 28, 2013, 11:21:55 AM »
maybe not suppressed but just not reported on because no iron clad evidence.  so now we invaded Iraq and also want to invade Syria.  the "war for oil" accusations would have run rampant.  because now GWB is starting a war with Syria and you know...he's from oil.

Evidence is evidence.  If they had paper trails from the logistics of manufacturing, transportation, storage and deployment that would be hard evidence.  And a case might have been made that they went to Syria.

Further more, during the 2004 election while many were questioning the reasoning for the invasion and the subsequent mishandling of the occupation, showing we invaded for "legitimate reasons" would have been golden for the GOP and Bush.

Additionally, reporting that kind of news  would have been a boom for a news station.

So i don't think this stuff was simply "not reported or suppressed".  Instead the story is probably false or simply rumor.  Until actual verified evidence is brought forth, which we have had 10 years of nothing except a few shells (which in itself discredits your theory because that story should have not been reported too) its safe so say, based on present evidence or lack there of there were no WMD's in Iraq.