I just don't get it...
The biggest difference between Bostin and "pro" bodybuilders is not the drug abuse, but the openness about it. To another extent would be a pro caliber physique, but Bostin on stage isn't bad.
If you ever looked back at our beloved Arnold, you'll see he deflated quite a bit between competitions. I didn't want to believe it for a long time, but he was all drugged up back then just like they are today.
Openness? He feed you pure bullshit and you think it is openness? So you are saying that Priest, who has been in this sport from the times of Arnold, doesn't know shit about anything, but this self proclaimed internet guru and wannabe bodybuilder knows it all? Just what Priest says: If this moron would have done what he is preaching, he would be at least twice as big he is. Instead of that this moron look like he has start last week? How come, if he knows what he is doing?
And why pro builders aren't open about these subjects? Have you ever wonder that? 1. Doping is prohibited in IFBB 2. These drugs are illegal most parts of the world. 3. If there would be straight instructions what, when and how much take, there would be exponentially more users than there is, and they would be much younger. Doping at this level shortens your life, so these modern day pro builders die at their sixty something or sooner. If you start sooner, you die sooner, so it is not appropriate to teach children's to use gear.