Author Topic: lb'age on machines  (Read 1673 times)

texasRUSH

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1324
  • here comes the hotstepper!
lb'age on machines
« on: May 29, 2006, 09:04:13 AM »
is that a true weight? 60lb curls on a machine feel like 40lb dumbbell curls...

and am i really benching 280 easily on a machine press? or are the pulley's removing alot more than i think they are?  ???

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2006, 09:06:14 AM »
It varies by machine-some are more accurate.

Not really important, all that really matters is relative improvement, increasing the number on whatever form of resistance is used.

texasRUSH

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1324
  • here comes the hotstepper!
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2006, 09:14:14 AM »
i use the whole stack on some of this shit....

just more reps!  ;D

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2006, 09:57:04 AM »
If you're using the whole stack, put some DBs on top, pre-exhaust first, or super-set, etc.

texasRUSH

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1324
  • here comes the hotstepper!
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2006, 09:59:12 AM »
i do machines after all my freeweight exercises  :-\

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2006, 10:15:06 AM »
It varies by machine-some are more accurate.

Not really important, all that really matters is relative improvement, increasing the number on whatever form of resistance is used.
yup... whether it's free weight or machine weight, stop looking at the poundages and focus on how it feels.

300

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 483
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2006, 03:28:42 PM »
i use the whole stack on some of this shit....

just more reps!  ;D

Wow! The whole stack?!
Ron Paul 2012

texasRUSH

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1324
  • here comes the hotstepper!
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2006, 04:44:13 PM »
lol what's yoru name again? sarcasm!?  ;) ;D

blondmusclhunk

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 638
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2006, 01:06:39 PM »
As far as machines Hammer strength is probably the best. Not the ones with the weight stack, but the plate loaded ones

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2006, 01:09:14 PM »
Hammer Strength is one of many good ones. Each company has particular ones that it's best at.

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2006, 11:15:45 AM »
Almost ALL machines being made today are not using a 1:1 ratio.

The reason for this is they're trying to maximize the versatility of the weight stack.

Almost every manufacture will provide the percent breakdown of each one of their machines

WOOO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18158
  • Fuck the mods
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2006, 07:17:04 AM »
Almost ALL machines being made today are not using a 1:1 ratio.

The reason for this is they're trying to maximize the versatility of the weight stack.

Almost every manufacture will provide the percent breakdown of each one of their machines
that's news to me... do you have an example?

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: lb'age on machines
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2006, 10:15:33 AM »
that's news to me... do you have an example?

Pick-up a phone & contact any manufacture.

They have systems that run 1:1 & others (mostly cable type machines) that don't.

It's not that hard to believe.

Have you ever got on one machine that did the same exact exercise as another manufacture...but for some reason...you can perform the exercise with more or less weight?